DOCSLIB.ORG

San Bernardino Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Bernardino Line SAN BERNARDINO LINE 57.94 S. Arrowhead Ave./1.20 42.4 CP ROCHESTER 45 mph t/o 57.82 S. D St./1.10 42.12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATION *DIB 57.76 CP REDLANDS 40.65 Hermosa Ave. 57.67 S. E St./1.00 40.2 CP ARCHIBALD 45 mph t/o 57.58 SAN BERNARDINO TRANSIT CENTER 40.14 Archibald Ave. 57.48 Ped. xing QZ 39.64 Hellman Ave. 57.42 S. G St./0.70 QZ 39.13 Vineyard Ave. 57.4 CP MORRIS 20 mph x/o 38.63 Baker Ave. 57.14 W. Rialto Ave./0.50 QZ SIGNAL 38.1/38.2 56.98 W. 2nd St./0.27 QZ 38.13 Grove Ave. 56.7 CP KENDALL 25 mph c/o 10 mph t/o 37.38 Campus Ave. 56.53 SAN BERNARDINO DEPOT 37.05 UPLAND STATION *DIB E/B Metrolink San Gabriel Sub. 87/87 36.98 2ND Ave. 56.3 CP VERNON 25 mph t/o c/o 36.81 Euclid Ave.* count as 2 str. N & S 55.3 CP RANCHO 53.9 E/B 45 MPH SIGNAL 36.1/36.2 55.24 Rancho Ave. 36.27 San Antonio Ave. 54.9 DETECTOR (talk) HB/DE 35.73 Mountain Ave. 54.54 Rialto Ave. 35.11 Benson Ave. SIGNAL 53.1/53.2 34.61 Central Ave. 53.95 Pepper Ave. 34.6 CP CENTRAL 40 mph t/o 53.70 Eucalyptus Ave. 34.26 MONTCLAIR STATION 53.45 Acacia St. 34.05 CP VISTA 15 mph t/o 53.19 Sycamore Ave. 33.68 Claremont Blvd. 52.94 Riverside Ave. 33.16 College Ave. 52.85 RIALTO STATION 33.12 CLAREMONT STATION 52.69 Willow Ave. 33.08 Ped. Xing 52.44 Lilac Ave. 32.91 Indian Hill Blvd. 52.4 CP LILAC 45 mph t/o 32.9 DETECTOR (talk) HB/DE 32.65 W/B 40 MPH 52.19 Cactus Ave. * Rule 6.21.1 pg.12 32.44 Cambridge Ave. 51.44 Cedar Ave. * Rule 6.21.1 pg.12 32.3 CP CAMBRIDGE - SIGNAL 32.1/32.2 #2 * 50.7 CP LOCUST 45 mph t/o 31.91 Town Ave. 50.69 Locust Ave. 31.23 Garey Ave. 50.19 Alder Ave. 31.03 Pomona Station entrance 49.69 Palmetto Ave. 31.02 Ped. Xing 49.44 Mango Ave. 31.0 POMONA STATION *DIB W/B SIGNAL 49.1/49.2 30.86 Station Ped. Xing W/E 49.19 Sierra Ave. 30.80 Fulton Rd. 49.08 FONTANA STATION 30.3 CP WHITE 40 mph t/o 48.94 Juniper Ave. 30.33 White Ave. 48.8 DETECTOR (talk) HB/DE 30.22 Paper Pak Pvt. xing 48.17 Citrus Ave. 30.15 Arrow Hwy. 47.5 CP BEECH “P” w/b only 15/45 mph t/o 30.1 POMONA FAIR PLEX STATION *DIB E/B 47.16 Beech Ave. “MP 47.1 Bridge” Rule 6.21.1 pg.12 29.98 Fair Plex Dr. 45.6 CP KAISER “P” 15 mph t/o SIGNAL 29.1/29.2 29.10 E/B 40 MPH 45.3 CA. SPEEDWAY STATION* 29.28 Wheeler Ave. 45.40 Calabash Ave. “MP 45.0 Bridge” Rule 6.21.1 pg.12 28.86 Gainey Ceramics 44.5 CP NOLAN “P” 45 mph t/o 28.56 San Dimas Cyn. Rd. 44.14 Etiwanda Ave. “MP 44.2 Bridge” Rule 6.21.1 pg.12 28.05 Walnut Ave. SIGNAL 43.1/43.2 “P” 27.80 San Dimas Ave. 42.88 Rochester Ave. SIGNAL 27.1/27.2 For updated copy POC Vinnie Wiscovitch@ 760-912-2914 *PROTECT THESE STATIONS: EL Monte / Claremont! Rule 6.30 applies Rev. 04/28/2019 Reflects the most recent m.p. changes and updates From Pasadena Jct. To CP Hondo extinguish ditch lites PG.31 *Please be extremely alert during school season heavy Ped. Traffic school children! m.p. 17.60 Cab car radio ch. 1-87 2-47 3-29 4-30 7-27 8-36 10-72 12-83 *Power lite indicators rule 6.32.7 added at 11.1/8.2/4.1 Control Sidings: CP Lilac - CP Locust, CP Rochester - CP Archibald, CP Amar-CP Bassett, CP Watson-CP Hondo, CP Jordan-CP Fremont, CP Marengo-CP Pasadena Jt. *New Museum tracks Hand throw SW @ CP Shortway 10 mph t/o IIATS IN EFFECT *DIB added at the stations that they apply too! *Rule 6.21.2 Water Above Rail *PTC IN EFFECT CP VERNON– CP MORENGO FOR SELECTED TRAINS *PTC SUPPORT– 909-451-2155 / 909 596-3284 *Not an Official Amtrak Document! 27.55 Cataract Ave. 17.59 * Foster St. Ped. xing. BE ALERT CHILDREN! 26.55 Lone Hill Ave. 17.34 Francisquito Ave. SIGNAL 26.1/26.2 16.90 Hamburger Ln. 26.05 Valley Ctr. Ave. 16.77 Pvt. xing 25.53 Sunflower Ave. 16.72 Pvt. xing 25.40 Covina Blvd. 16.6 CP AMAR 30 mph t/o 16.50 W/B 40 MPH 25.00 Bonnie Cove Ave. 16.43 Amar Rd. SIGNAL 24.1/24.2 16.09 Temple Ave. East side 24.73 Cypress St. 15.3 CP BASSETT 30 mph t/o 15.0 E/B 40 MPH 24.46 Glendora Ave. 15.13 Temple Ave. West Side 23.93 Grand Ave. 13.92 Cogswell Rd. 23.42 Barranca Ave. SIGNAL 13.1/13.2 13.15 W/B 25 MPH 23.4 CP BARRANCA 60 mph t/o 12.9 CP WATSON 40 mph t/o 23.0 COVINA STATION 12.70 Tyler st 22.92 Citrus Ave. 12.63 EL MONTE STATION * 22.41 Hollenbeck Ave. 12.5 CP HONDO 20 mph t/o SIGNAL 21.3/21.4/21.1/21.2*reversed! * ditch lites! 21.91 Azusa Ave. FLY-OVER 25 mph E/E - 40 mph W/E 21.40 Lark Ellen Ave. SIGNAL 11.1/11.2 * 6.32.7 Applies 10.70 E/B 40 MPH 20.90 Vincent Ave. SIGNAL 8.1/8.2 * 6.32.7 Applies 7.01 W/B 55 MPH 20.4 CP IRWIN 60 mph t/o 6.3 CP JORDAN 15 mph t/o 20.40 Irwindale Ave. 6.05 CP FREMONT 15 mph t/o 5.80 W/B 50 MPH 19.89 Azusa Cyn. Rd. 4.63 CAL STATE STATION * DIB BOTH SIGNAL 19.1/19.2 SIGNAL 4.1/4.2 *6.32.7 Applies 18.96 Downing Ave.* 2.4 CP MARENGO 45 mph t/o 3.90 E/B 40.MPH 18.98 Ramona Blvd. * 1.08/482.3 CP PASADENA JCT. 15 mph/10 mph * Downing & Ramona intersect! *ditch lites! 1.75 W/B 25 MPH 18.89 BALDWIN PARK STATION Metrolink River Sub. 47/47 18.71 Pacific Ave. 0.8/140.00 CP WEST DIMAOND 15 mph 18.36 Macdevitt St. 0.7 CP MISSION (12 mph t/o) 25 mph 18.03 Merced Ave. 0.48 CP TERMINAL (12 mph t/o) SIGNAL 18.1/18.2 0.3 CP 31/32/33/34 0.0 LAUPT .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles County – California
    AZUSA CITY LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA, U. S. A. Azusa, California Azusa, California Azusa is a city in the San Gabriel Valley, at the foot of the San Gabriel Azusa es una ciudad en el valle de San Gabriel, al pie de las montañas de Mountains in Los Angeles County, California, United States. San Gabriel en el condado de Los Ángeles, California, Estados Unidos. The A on the San Gabriel Mountains represents the city of Azusa, and La A en las montañas de San Gabriel representa la ciudad de Azusa, y se can be seen within a 30-mile radius. The population was 46,361 at the 2010 puede ver dentro de un radio de 30 millas. La población era de 46,361 census, up from 44,712 at the 2000 census. Azusa is located along historic habitantes en el censo de 2010, frente a 44.712 en el censo de 2000. Azusa se Route 66, which passes through the city on Foothill Boulevard and Alosta encuentra a lo largo de la histórica Ruta 66, que pasa por la ciudad en Foothill Avenue. Boulevard y Alosta Avenue. Contents Contenido 1. History 1. Historia 2. Geography 2. Geografía 2.1 Climate 2.1 Clima 3. Demographics 3. Demografía 3.1 2010 3.1 2010 3.2 2000 3.2 2000 4. Economy 4. economía 5. Superfundsite 5. Superfondo 6. Government and infrastructure 6. Gobierno e infraestructura 7. Education 7. educación 7.1 Public Schools 7.1 Escuelas públicas 7.2 Private Schools. 7.2 Escuelas privadas. 8. Transportation 8. Transporte 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley & Spruce Project Initial Study and Mitigated
    VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: City of Rialto December 2017 VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared For: City of Rialto 150 S. Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 401 B Street, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 December 2017 095894012 Copyright © 2017 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Initial Study ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 2 III. Required Permits ................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 9 V. Determination ........................................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Environmental Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 10 1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................ 10 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • February 2006 Metrolink Matters
    FEB RUA RY ’0 6 Dear Metrolink Riders, January 26 is a sad day for Metrolink. January 26 is the day that an individual, for reasons we do not hope to understand, poured gasoline on his car and then parked it on the Metrolink right-of-way in Glendale triggering events that ended with two of our trains derailed. Ten of our passengers and one of our crew members died on that horrible day. Many others were hurt and still others were wounded by the loss of friends, family members and colleagues. We want to acknowledge that day by recognizing these terrible losses and expressing our gratitude to you, our passengers for your loyalty and support throughout this past year. We have worked fi ercely throughout this last year to implement a variety of changes to our rights-of-way and our equipment to ensure, to the best of our abilities, that nothing like January 26 ever happens to Metrolink passengers again. All transportation has risks, and Metrolink is already 20 times safer than riding in any automobile. However, if the opportunity exists to even incrementally increase our level of safety – we will absolutely pursue it. Forty percent of the Metrolink staff commutes every day by train. We work at Metrolink. We ride Metrolink. And even on days like January 26 when our hearts are completely broken, we believe in what we do. Thank you for being a part of the Metrolink family. David Solow Art Brown Metrolink CEO Metrolink Board Chairman ((800)8 0 0 ) 3371-LINK7 1 - www.metrolinktrains.com Metrolink Matters February ’06 Inside Metrolink Metrolink considers the safety of our passengers our number-one priority, n Environment—Metrolink is studying an innovative approach involving and we’re proud to provide our almost 42,000 weekly riders with a secure and sealed corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Gold Line Report
    STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDY REPORT FOR METRO GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION TO LA/ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority Funded By San Bernardino Associated Governments and The Southern California Association of Governments December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority Southern California Association of Governments San Bernardino Associated Governments San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors Los Angeles World Airports PREPARED BY: KOA Corporation In Association with: STV Incorporated J.L. Patterson & Associates, INC. Consensus Planning Group, Inc. CITYWORKS DESIGN Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension to LA/Ontario International Airport Strategic Planning Study Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... E-1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................................. E-1 PLANNING TEAM APPROACH AND PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................................................................................................... E-1 THE ALIGNMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................ E-2 ADDITIONAL STUDY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Agenda Item No. 34
    Supplemental Agenda Item No. 34 Board of Directors Meeting January 9, 2019 10:30 a.m. Location: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority First Floor Lobby Board Room Santa Fe Depot, 1170 W. 3rd Street San Bernardino CA. 92410 DISCUSSION CALENDAR Transit 34. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project Update That the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: A. Receive and file an update on the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project. B. Provide direction to staff on the need to work with the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority to develop Diesel Multiple Unit Service to meet the transit and transit-oriented development needs in Montclair in case the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B terminates west of the San Bernardino County/Los Angeles County line. This agenda item was made available after the posting of the agenda. Minute Action SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEM: 34 Date: January 9, 2019 Subject: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project Update Recommendation: That the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: A. Receive and file an update on the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B Project. B. Provide direction to staff on the need to work with the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority to develop Diesel Multiple Unit Service to meet the transit and transit-oriented development needs in Montclair in case the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B terminates west of the San Bernardino County/Los Angeles County line.
    [Show full text]
  • MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map
    MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map N SIDE Gates 1-29 Level 1 Gates 100-129 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (8A) Level 2 Baggage Claim Gates 10-19 Gates Ticketing Locations 20-29 Gates 100-111 A-1 A-2 Level 3 A-3 A-4 2 1 Gates Gates 1-9 112-129 Hyatt Regency - Lvl.4 - Lvl.4 Regency Hyatt Security Checkpoint To Gates 70 - 129 70 Gates To Food Court To Gates 1-59 1-59 Gates To Security Checkpoint Gates 70-79 Gates 50-59 To Parking “C” Gates 3 90-99 4 B-1 B-2 Level 3 B-3 B-4 Gates Gates 30-39 Ticketing Locations Gates 80-89 40-49 Gates 70-99 Level 2 Gates 30-59 Baggage Claim Level 1 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (28B) SIDE C Check-in and baggage claim locations subject to change. Please check signage on arrival. *Map not to scale Find it ALL in One Place Welcome to Orlando Download the Orlando MCO App Available for International Airport (MCO) OrlandoAirports.net /flymco @MCO @flymco Flight Arrival Guide 03/18 To reach the Main Terminal, The journey to the To retrieve checked baggage, take follow directions on the overhead Main Terminal (A-Side or B-Side) the stairs, escalator or elevator down signage to the shuttle station 2 takes just over one minute. As the 4 6 to the Arrivals/Baggage Claim on which is located in the center train transports you, observe the Level 2. Check the monitors to of the Airside Terminal. signage and listen to the instructions determine the correct carousel directing you to either Baggage Claim A for your flight.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOGLE LLC V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GOOGLE LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT No. 18–956. Argued October 7, 2020—Decided April 5, 2021 Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. In 2005, Google acquired Android and sought to build a new software platform for mobile devices. To allow the millions of programmers familiar with the Java programming language to work with its new Android plat- form, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the Java SE pro- gram. The copied lines are part of a tool called an Application Pro- gramming Interface (API). An API allows programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks for use in their own programs. Over the course of protracted litigation, the lower courts have considered (1) whether Java SE’s owner could copyright the copied lines from the API, and (2) if so, whether Google’s copying constituted a permissible “fair use” of that material freeing Google from copyright liability. In the proceedings below, the Federal Circuit held that the copied lines are copyrightable.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Train 111 Dear Readers
    METROLINK NEWS & EVENTS • OCT./NOV. 2008 (800) 371-LINK • www.metroLINKtraINs.com n Schedule changeS n Improv Ing TraIn SafeTy— n m eTrolInk holIday INSIDE 2 3 WhaT’S nexT? 4 Toy expreSSTm n c loSer look: n T he annual juleS 6 cell-phone uSage 7 verne feSTIval Metrolink Train 111 Dear Readers, We have all been touched in some way by the contract-oversight process and emergency-response plans. devastating collision of Metrolink Train 111 and a Union All together, the agency’s continued focus on safety will Pacific freight train the afternoon of September 12 in help improve the safety of our rail service—and, ideally, will Chatsworth. Because you are valued members of the encourage other railway systems nationwide to adopt new Metrolink family, we want to share with you some of the critical safety programs. many actions Metrolink, its Board of Directors, and member Metrolink staff and Board members have also been agencies have enacted to help ensure your continued safety working diligently with our Congressional representatives in and security. California and Washington, D.C., to accelerate legislative Our actions went first to the families and passengers support for rail safety and to encourage much-needed directly affected by this tragedy. Metrolink’s Board of investment in our transportation infrastructure. With strong Directors quickly and unanimously approved several leadership from Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara actions in the immediate days after September 12, Boxer, important new legislation has been signed by the including creation of an ongoing Assistance Fund to President, which mandates the installation of new train- provide an opportunity for the general public, businesses, stopping technology—known as Positive Train Control—on and community members to offer their financial support all major railroads and passenger and commuter railroads to those affected by the collision and creation of an by 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • REDLANDS PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT (ARROW) Plan. Build
    REDLANDS PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT (ARROW) Arrow connects to • Mountain Transit San Bernardino – 210 • Omnitrans to CSUSB to Downtown Station • Pass Transit • Victor Valley Transit Overview San Bernardino Santa Fe Depot The Redlands Passenger Rail Project is an innovative nine-mile regional Tippecanoe Metrolink connects to Station N • Los Angeles INTERSTATE rail project that provides additional transportation choices through the CALIFORNIA • Orange County 10 University introduction of a new rail service, known as the Arrow, which integrates • San Diego Station • Riverside INTERSTATE • Ventura CALIFORNIA conveniently with other modes of transportation such as auto, bus and 215 Esri to Loma Linda University Station bicycle. Medical Center Redlands – N Downtown Station The Arrow will connect San Bernardino and Redlands and will offer residents, businesses and visitors a new commuting option to travel to a variety of leisure, education, healthcare and other destinations. Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs) have been identified as the preferred vehicle to provide primary service for the project. The DMUs are powered by an on-board low-emission, Clean Diesel engine which are smaller, quieter, more Funding efficient, and cheaper to operate than standard locomotive haul coaches, similar to Metrolink. DMUs work interoperably on the same track as Metrolink FEDERAL $86.0 Million and freight train services which allows for all three train services to use the STATE $164.6 Million same track in the existing corridor. LOCAL $109.1 Million (Includes Measure I) In addition to local commuter service, a Metrolink locomotive hauled coach train will also provide round trip express service from Redlands-to-Los TOTAL $359.7 Million Angeles each morning with return trip from Los Angeles-to-Redlands each evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No
    Submitted by the expert from OICA Informal document GRSG-110-08-Rev.1 (110th GRSG, 26-29 April 2016, agenda item 2(a)) Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No. 100 (Electric Power Train Vehicle) vs. UN Regulation No. 107 Annex 12 (Construction of M2/M3 Vehicles) for Electrical Safety 1. At 110th session of GRSG Belgium proposes to amend UN R107 annex 12 by deleting the requirements for trolleybuses (see GRSG/2016/05) and transfer the requirements into UN R100 (see GRSP/2016/07), which will be on the agenda of upcoming GRSP session in May 2016. 2. Due to the design of a trolleybus and stated in UN Regulation No. 107, trolleybuses are dual- mode vehicles. They can operate either: (a) in trolley mode, when connected to the overhead contact line (OCL), or (b) in bus mode when not connected to the OCL. When not connected to the OCL, they can also be (c) in charging mode, where they are stationary and plugged into the power grid for battery charging. 3. The basic principles of the design of the electric powertrain of the trolleybus and the connection to the OCL is based on international standards developed for trams and trains and is implemented and well accepted in the market worldwide. 4. Due to the fact that the trolleybus is used on public roads the trolleybus has to fulfil the regulations under the umbrella of the UNECE regulatory framework due to the existing national regulations (e.g. European frame work directive). 5. Therefore the annex 12 in UN R107 was amended to align the additional safety prescriptions for trolleybuses with the corresponding electrical standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Cost Estimate Memo Technical Note Project: Hybrid Rail Study
    Appendix F: Capital Cost Estimate Memo Technical Note Project: Hybrid Rail Study Prepared by: Amjad Hussain Date: 4/30/18 Approved by: Eric Banghart Checked by: Darlene Gonzalez Subject: Capital Cost Estimate Memo 1 Background and Purpose The Double tracking cost estimate is a based on the preliminary 5% level of design. The following describes the methodology used to develop this cost estimate. This report describes the development of capital cost estimates for infrastructure increase to accompany the Hybrid DMU vehicles. Rough order-of-magnitude capital cost estimates were developed for the following scenarios: ● Supplementing Existing Service between Pomona North and University of Redlands ● Limited bi-directional blended scenarios between El Monte and University of Redlands – 30-Minute service – 15-Minute service ● Limited bi-directional blended scenarios between Pomona North and University of Redlands – 30-Minute service – 15-Minute service ● Unconstrained scenarios between terminus station (El Monte, Pomona North, or Montclair) and University of Redlands – 30-minute service – 20-minute service – 15-minute service ● Ontario Airport Total (Escalated to 2018) Prepare from previous capital cost estimates Each scenario includes an estimate of the probable cost of construction with appropriate increase in vehicles and new/modifications to the existing platforms. The cost estimate addresses double tracking route alignment, existing track shifts, infrastructure improvements and other system costs. The cost estimates will include appropriate design allowances, allocated and unallocated contingency mark-ups as individual line items. A Basis of Estimate Report explaining the scope, assumptions and limitations of the estimating process will accompany the cost estimate. 2 Estimate Definition In order to estimate project capital cost quantities, further conceptual engineering design development double tracking improvements and station modifications where necessary as part of the 15, 20 and 30- minute route planning scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Electric Trail
    Pacific Electric Trail Fontana, Seven Year Budget California 2009/2010 A City of Action 2015/2016 ABOUT THE COVER For the City of Fontana’s Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Adopted Capital Improvement Program, a cover highlighting “the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail” is featured. The Pacific Electric Trail (PE Trail) is proposed as a 20 mile, regional, multi-purpose trail extending from Claremont, through Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto. The trail was adopted by all the cities it traverses to promote non-motorized travel and other clean air programs. The Master Plan has been completed, and the individual cities have been implementing their respective portions of the PE Trail. Approximately 6.5 miles of the PE Trail traverses through Fontana. As shown on the map below, the City has divided the PE Trail Segment 5B 6.5 miles of PE Trail into six major segments. The existing abandoned railroad right-of-way, on which the PE Trail is located, is 80 feet wide and is consistent throughout each segment. The southerly 35 feet is dedicated to the multi-purpose trail which will consist of a 15 foot wide concrete paved walking/jogging/bike path and landscaping. The northerly 45 feet of that right-of-way is reserved for future rail considerations however, the area may also be landscaped. Four years ago Segment 1 of the PE Trail, a .75 mile segment through the downtown and Civic Center area, was completed. Segment 5A, a .43 mile segment in the Village of Heritage, was completed shortly thereafter. In January 2009 Segment 2, approximately .94 of a mile running from Juniper Ave to Tokay Ave, was completed.
    [Show full text]