GUEST EDITORIAL N S87

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GUEST EDITORIAL N S87 GUEST EDITORIAL n S87 Guest editorial Oral rehabilitation of complete edentulism by means of implants to support a fixed dental prosthesis with Wilfried Wagner, Prof Dr Dr of implants is, and has been for decades, a predict- a long-term predictable outcome. The key question University Medical Center able treatment option. It provides an improved qual- is whether a more limited number of implants, than of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, ity of life, clearly superior to what can be achieved by the classical 5 to 6 and more, suffice. A more limited Germany mucosally retained dentures. But when the question number of implants could avoid the invasiveness of is raised of how many implants one needs to properly bone augmentation/grafting procedures. A review deal with the rehabilitation of edentulous patients, of the literature (Nkenke and Neukam) underlined opinions are sometimes country-specific, while sci- that, as an intraoral donor site for autologous bone ence should be borderless. grafting, the mandibular ascending ramus is pref- The Foundation for Oral Rehabilitation (F O R) erable. The symphyseal area leads to the highest took up the challenge. Being a global network of (incidence of) morbidities. The posterior iliac crest experts and clinicians it always refers to scientifically is a good alternative but implies mostly general an- sound and well-proven data, which are universally aesthesia. accepted. A number of reputed researchers and cli- Another meta-analysis (Al-Nawas and Schieg- Daniel van nicians were selected to tackle the question of the nitz) proved that the survival rate of oral implants Steenberghe, MD, PhD, Drhc, number of implants needed, in a thoroughly scien- placed in conjunction with augmentation procedures HFRCS (Irl) tific manner. Their selection was based on exper- is as good with bone substitute material as with au- em. Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic tise, number of publications and their citation index tologous bone grafts. Nevertheless, the bone aug- University Leuven, Belgium related to this theme. Each one received a specific mentation procedure by itself is more invasive and subject to critically review in the literature, and if more prone to postoperative pain and discomfort data were sufficiently available to provide a meta- than the straightforward (flapless) placement of analysis. After exchanging their manuscripts, the implants. Thus, if the treatment is patient-centred, experts met during 2 days at the University of Mainz. avoiding bone augmentation should be considered. Travel and hotel expenses were taken care of by Patient satisfaction with graftless solutions is indeed F O R, but no other compensation was provided. very high and patients’ preference to minimally inva- For any elective surgery, the patient should be sive implant surgery well established (Pommer and involved in opting among the wide range of treat- Watzek). ment alternatives. All participants chose the patient- The key question then becomes what should be centred viewpoint as a starting point. For a remov- the minimal/optimal number of implants to insure a able overdenture, one can choose whether to have reliable long-term outcome for the (fixed) prosthetic it on 2 or 4 implants in the mandible and 4 or more rehabilitation. Two decades ago (Brånemark et al1), implants in the maxilla. Fixed prostheses are gener- it was shown in a large-scale retrospective study that ally placed on 5 or 6 implants and sometimes even the 10-year survival in edentulous patients of fixed more in the maxilla. dental prostheses on either 4 or on 6 implants was When only a limited jawbone volume remains, not significantly different. The tradition to insert at it can be necessary to consider bone augmentation least 5 to 6 implants in edentulous jaws thus became procedures to (optimally) place a sufficient number questionable. Since very high survival rates are pres- Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(Suppl2):S87–S88 S88 n GUEST EDITORIAL The group of experts from left to right: Drs Gerry Raghoebar, Bernhard Pommer, Claudia Dellavia, John Brunski, Wilfried Wagner, Daniel van Steenberghe, Emeka Nkenke, Massimo Del Fabbro, Bilal Al-Nawas, Regina Mericske-Stern, Georg Watzek. ently reached by implants with moderately rough When segmentation of the fixed cross-arch surfaces, the concept of inserting supplementary framework is necessary, more than 4 implants are implants just to avoid a revision surgery should one needed (Mericske-Stern and Worni), which raises implant fail became more or less obsolete. the treatment cost and can render a bone augmenta- Furthermore, biomechanical calculations prove tion procedure indispensable. One may wonder why that with 4 implants to support a complete cross- CAD-CAM technologies, which do reach the neces- arch fixed reconstruction, strains in the bone or at sary precision of fit, are not used in these instances the bone-implant interface remain within the safe to keep the treatment less invasive. range (Brunski). Tilted implants, to insure a proper We both feel privileged to coordinate this first anterior-posterior spread, can even be subject to F O R consensus conference. The multidisciplinary lower forces than axial ones (Del Fabbro and Cere- interactions favoured cross-fertilisation but never- soli). Furthermore, the marginal bone level around theless led to an iteratively written consensus docu- tilted implants does not significantly differ from that ment, which was unanimously approved. around axial implants. The latter offers the possibil- The conclusions of this workshop should lead cli- ity to achieve a good anterior-posterior spread with nicians to also consider, for the benefit of their eden- few implants. tulous patients, less invasive procedures. Established Functional aspects of implant-supported reha- scientific data, which should always prevail on tradi- bilitations have been investigated by different meth- tions, do indeed prove that for complete edentulism, odologies. The number of implants supporting the unless specific aesthetic and/or functional demands prostheses does not appear as a relevant factor in are pressing, 4 implants only can already provide a the functional qualities (Dellavia et al). predictable anchorage for fixed prostheses. Wilfried Wagner Daniel van Steenberghe [email protected] [email protected] Moderators of the Consensus meeting 1. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Ress1995;6:227–231. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(Suppl2):S87–S88 CONTENTS n S89 European Journal of Oral Implantology Supplement 2, Summer 2014 Contents EDITORIAL Marco Exsposito GUEST EDITORIAL 87 Wilfried Wagner, Daniel van Steenberghe REVIEW article Patients’ preferences towards minimally invasive treatment alternatives for implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws 91 Bernhard Pommer, Georg Mailath-Pokorny, Robert Haas, Dieter Busenlechner, Rudolf Fürhauser, Georg Watzek CLINICAL article Biomechanical aspects of the optimal number of implants to carry a cross-arch full restoration 111 John B. Brunski REVIEW articleS Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: A review of the literature 133 Regina Mericske-Stern, Andreas Worni Functional jaw muscle assessment in patients with a full fixed prosthesis on a limited number of implants: A review of the literature 155 Claudia Dellavia, Riccardo Rosati, Massimo Del Fabbro, Gaia Pellegrini CLINICAL article The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: A systematic review 171 Massimo Del Fabbro, Valentina Ceresoli REVIEW article A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: How many implants? 191 Gerry M. Raghoebar, Henny J.A. Meijer, Wim Slot, James J.R. Huddleston Slater, Arjan Vissink CLINICAL article Autogenous bone harvesting and grafting in advanced jaw resorption: Morbidity, resorption and implant survival 203 Emeka Nkenke, Friedrich W. Neukam REVIEW article Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone – a systematic review and meta-analysis 219 Bilal Al-Nawas, Eik Schiegnitz CONSENSUS statements Patient-centred rehabilitation of edentulism with an optimal number of implants 235 Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7(Suppl2):S89 S90 n IMPRINT European Journal of Oral Implantology Subscription information Editors Contact your nearest Quintessence office: Marco Esposito, Arcore, Italy (Editor-in-Chief) Jerome Lindeboom, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, Michele Nieri, Florence, Italy Quintessence House, Grafton Road, Søren Schou, Aarhus, Denmark New Malden, Surrey KT3 3AB, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 8949 6087 Editorial Board Fax: +44 (0)20 8336 1484 Email: [email protected] Carlos Aparicio, Spain Torsten Jemt, Sweden www.quintpub.co.uk Karl Bishop, UK Søren Jepsen, Germany Ian Brook, UK Ronald Jung, Switzerland Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH Jason Buglass, UK Matthias Kern, Germany Ifenpfad 2–4, D-12107, Berlin, Gioacchino Cannizzaro, Italy Fouad Khoury, Germany Germany Matteo Chiapasco, Italy Ye Lin, China Tel: +49-30-761 80-5 Noel Claffey, Ireland Hassan Maghaireh, UK StJohn Crean, UK Chantal Malevez, Belgium Fax: +49-30-761 80-68-0 Rubén Davó, Spain Paulo Maló, Portugal Email: [email protected] Nikolaos Donos, UK Mauro Merli, Italy www.quintessenz.de Pietro Felice, Italy Ken Nicholson, UK Anne-Marie Glenny, UK Alan Payne, New Zealand Quintessence Publishing
Recommended publications
  • Pg 131 Chondroblast -> Chondrocyte (Lacunae) Firm Ground Substance
    Figure 4.8g Connective tissues. Chondroblast ‐> Chondrocyte (Lacunae) Firm ground substance (chondroitin sulfate and water) Collagenous and elastic fibers (g) Cartilage: hyaline No BV or nerves Description: Amorphous but firm Perichondrium (dense irregular) matrix; collagen fibers form an imperceptible network; chondroblasts produce the matrix and when mature (chondrocytes) lie in lacunae. Function: Supports and reinforces; has resilient cushioning properties; resists compressive stress. Location: Forms most of the embryonic skeleton; covers the ends Chondrocyte of long bones in joint cavities; forms in lacuna costal cartilages of the ribs; cartilages of the nose, trachea, and larynx. Matrix Costal Photomicrograph: Hyaline cartilage from the cartilages trachea (750x). Thickness? Metabolism? Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Pg 131 Figure 6.1 The bones and cartilages of the human skeleton. Epiglottis Support Thyroid Larynx Smooth Cartilage in Cartilages in cartilage external ear nose surface Cricoid Trachea Articular Lung Cushions cartilage Cartilage of a joint Cartilage in Costal Intervertebral cartilage disc Respiratory tube cartilages in neck and thorax Pubic Bones of skeleton symphysis Meniscus (padlike Axial skeleton cartilage in Appendicular skeleton knee joint) Cartilages Articular cartilage of a joint Hyaline cartilages Elastic cartilages Fibrocartilages Pg 174 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 4.8g Connective tissues. (g) Cartilage: hyaline Description: Amorphous but firm matrix; collagen fibers form an imperceptible network; chondroblasts produce the matrix and when mature (chondrocytes) lie in lacunae. Function: Supports and reinforces; has resilient cushioning properties; resists compressive stress. Location: Forms most of the embryonic skeleton; covers the ends Chondrocyte of long bones in joint cavities; forms in lacuna costal cartilages of the ribs; cartilages of the nose, trachea, and larynx.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomina Histologica Veterinaria, First Edition
    NOMINA HISTOLOGICA VETERINARIA Submitted by the International Committee on Veterinary Histological Nomenclature (ICVHN) to the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists Published on the website of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists www.wava-amav.org 2017 CONTENTS Introduction i Principles of term construction in N.H.V. iii Cytologia – Cytology 1 Textus epithelialis – Epithelial tissue 10 Textus connectivus – Connective tissue 13 Sanguis et Lympha – Blood and Lymph 17 Textus muscularis – Muscle tissue 19 Textus nervosus – Nerve tissue 20 Splanchnologia – Viscera 23 Systema digestorium – Digestive system 24 Systema respiratorium – Respiratory system 32 Systema urinarium – Urinary system 35 Organa genitalia masculina – Male genital system 38 Organa genitalia feminina – Female genital system 42 Systema endocrinum – Endocrine system 45 Systema cardiovasculare et lymphaticum [Angiologia] – Cardiovascular and lymphatic system 47 Systema nervosum – Nervous system 52 Receptores sensorii et Organa sensuum – Sensory receptors and Sense organs 58 Integumentum – Integument 64 INTRODUCTION The preparations leading to the publication of the present first edition of the Nomina Histologica Veterinaria has a long history spanning more than 50 years. Under the auspices of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists (W.A.V.A.), the International Committee on Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature (I.C.V.A.N.) appointed in Giessen, 1965, a Subcommittee on Histology and Embryology which started a working relation with the Subcommittee on Histology of the former International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee. In Mexico City, 1971, this Subcommittee presented a document entitled Nomina Histologica Veterinaria: A Working Draft as a basis for the continued work of the newly-appointed Subcommittee on Histological Nomenclature. This resulted in the editing of the Nomina Histologica Veterinaria: A Working Draft II (Toulouse, 1974), followed by preparations for publication of a Nomina Histologica Veterinaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Bone Repair
    Biology of Bone Repair J. Scott Broderick, MD Original Author: Timothy McHenry, MD; March 2004 New Author: J. Scott Broderick, MD; Revised November 2005 Types of Bone • Lamellar Bone – Collagen fibers arranged in parallel layers – Normal adult bone • Woven Bone (non-lamellar) – Randomly oriented collagen fibers – In adults, seen at sites of fracture healing, tendon or ligament attachment and in pathological conditions Lamellar Bone • Cortical bone – Comprised of osteons (Haversian systems) – Osteons communicate with medullary cavity by Volkmann’s canals Picture courtesy Gwen Childs, PhD. Haversian System osteocyte osteon Picture courtesy Gwen Childs, PhD. Haversian Volkmann’s canal canal Lamellar Bone • Cancellous bone (trabecular or spongy bone) – Bony struts (trabeculae) that are oriented in direction of the greatest stress Woven Bone • Coarse with random orientation • Weaker than lamellar bone • Normally remodeled to lamellar bone Figure from Rockwood and Green’s: Fractures in Adults, 4th ed Bone Composition • Cells – Osteocytes – Osteoblasts – Osteoclasts • Extracellular Matrix – Organic (35%) • Collagen (type I) 90% • Osteocalcin, osteonectin, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, lipids (ground substance) – Inorganic (65%) • Primarily hydroxyapatite Ca5(PO4)3(OH)2 Osteoblasts • Derived from mesenchymal stem cells • Line the surface of the bone and produce osteoid • Immediate precursor is fibroblast-like Picture courtesy Gwen Childs, PhD. preosteoblasts Osteocytes • Osteoblasts surrounded by bone matrix – trapped in lacunae • Function
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Cartilage Dense Fibrous CT (Tendons & Nonelastic Ligaments) Dense Elastic CT (Elastic Ligaments)
    Chapter 6 Content Review Questions 1-8 1. The skeletal system consists of what connective tissues? Bone Cartilage Dense fibrous CT (tendons & nonelastic ligaments) Dense elastic CT (elastic ligaments) List the functions of these tissues. Bone: supports the body, protects internal organs, provides levers on which muscles act, store minerals, and produce blood cells. Cartilage provides a model for bone formation and growth, provides a smooth cushion between adjacent bones, and provides firm, flexible support. Tendons attach muscles to bones and ligaments attach bone to bone. 2. Name the major types of fibers and molecules found in the extracellular matrix of the skeletal system. Collagen Proteoglycans Hydroxyapatite Water Minerals How do they contribute to the functions of tendons, ligaments, cartilage and bones? The collagen fibers of tendons and ligaments make these structures very tough, like ropes or cables. Collagen makes cartilage tough, whereas the water-filled proteoglycans make it smooth and resistant. As a result, cartilage is relatively rigid, but springs back to its original shape if it is bent or slightly compressed, and it is an excellent shock absorber. The extracellular matrix of bone contains collagen and minerals, including calcium and phosphate. Collagen is a tough, ropelike protein, which lends flexible strength to the bone. The mineral component gives the bone compression (weight-bearing) strength. Most of the mineral in the bone is in the form of hydroxyapatite. 3. Define the terms diaphysis, epiphysis, epiphyseal plate, medullary cavity, articular cartilage, periosteum, and endosteum. Diaphysis – the central shaft of a long bone. Epiphysis – the ends of a long bone. Epiphyseal plate – the site of growth in bone length, found between each epiphysis and diaphysis of a long bone and composed of cartilage.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Salts Provide Vital Minerals -Lipids Are in Stored Yellow Marrow
    10/12/2011 Primary Functions of Skeletal System 1. support 2. storage of minerals & lipids -calcium salts provide vital minerals -lipids are in stored yellow marrow 3. blood cell production -RBC’s, WBC’s, and other constituents produced 4. protection ribs: heart & lungs skull: brain vertebrae: spinal chord etc. 5. leverage: w/o bone contracting muscles just get short & fat Classification of Bones 3. Flat bones (thin roughly parallel surfaces) • Every adult skeleton contains 206 bones which can be arranged into six broad categories • Roof of skull, ribs, the sternum, scapula according to shape • Provide great protection 1. Long bones (relatively long and slender) • Provide lots of surface area for muscle • Found in arm, forearm, leg, palm, soles, attachment fingers, toes 4. Irregular bones (complex shapes with short, • The femur is the largest and heaviest bone in flat, notched or ridged surfaces) the body • Spinal vertebrae and several skull bones 2. Short Bones (box-like) • Carpal bones in wrist, tarsal bones in ankle 5. Sesamoid bones (generally small, flat, and shaped like sesame seed) • Develop inside tendons, commonly near joints i.e.- the patellae 6. Sutural bones (wormian bones) • Small, flat, irregularly shaped bones, form between flat bones of skull 1 10/12/2011 Each bone contains two types of Osseous Long bones (bone) tissue •Spaces in the joints are filled with synovial fluid 1. Compact (dense) tissue: •The epiphysis in the joint is covered by a layer of •Tightly packed hyaline cartilage called articular cartilage. •Occurs on outside surface of bone for strength •The me du llary cav ity an d the open spaces o f the & protection epiphysis are filled with marrow: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone and Bone Tissue Skeletal System = , , Bones Are Main Organs
    61 Chapter 6: Bone and Bone Tissue Skeletal system = , , Bones are main organs: - osseous tissue - dense regular and irregular CT, plus bone marrow Module 6.1: Introduction to Bones as Organs FunctionsFUNCTIONS of OF the THE Skeletal SKELETAL SYSTEM System • Functions: 1. Protection 2. Mineral storage and 3. Blood cell formation: involved in formation of blood cells (hematopoiesis or hemopoiesis) 4. Fat storage: in yellow bone marrow of 5. Movement: bones are sites for skeletal muscle attachment 6. Support: supports weight and provides BONE STRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION (based on shape) 1. Long bones - longer than they are wide; - include most bones in arms and legs 2. Short bones – roughly cube-shaped - include carpals and 62 3. Flat bones – thin and broad bones - ribs, pelvis, sternum and 4. Irregular bones – include and certain skull bones 5. Sesamoid bones – located within BONE STRUCTURE Structure of long bone: • Periosteum – membrane surrounds outer surface • Perforating fibers (Sharpey’s fibers) - anchors periosteum firmly to bone surface • Diaphysis – • Epiphysis - of long bone (proximal & distal) • Articular cartilage – hyaline cartilage • Marrow cavity – contains bone marrow (red or yellow) • Endosteum – thin membrane lining marrow cavity Compact bone - hard, dense outer region - allows bone to resist stresses (compression & twisting) • Spongy bone ( bone) - found inside cortical bone - honeycomb-like framework of bony struts; - resist forces from many directions • EpiphySeal lines – separates epiphyses from diaphysis - remnants of
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Development Histology Fundamentals > Musculoskeletal System > Musculoskeletal System
    Bone Development Histology Fundamentals > Musculoskeletal System > Musculoskeletal System BONE DEVELOPMENT: OSTEOGENESIS (OSSIFICATION)  Endochondral ossification • An INDIRECT form of ossification, wherein a hyaline cartilaginous model (template) is replaced with bone, such as occurs with long bones (eg, the femur). Intramembranous ossification • A DIRECT form of ossification mesenchymal cells directly differentiate to osteoblasts (no cartilaginous model is first formed), such as occurs with flat bones (the skull bones). INTRAMEMBRANOUS OSSIFICATION  • Embryologically, skeletal tissues typically derive from mesoderm: the midline (axial) skeleton derives from the somites and the appendicular (the limb) skeleton derives from the lateral plate. • Mesenchymal cells migrate to vascularized gelatinous extracellular collagen fiber matrix (a primary spongiosa). • They differentiate directly into osteoblasts. • Osteoblasts form bone in a loosely arranged (disorganized), immature initial form of bone, called woven bone. • Osteoblasts become trapped within their own bony matrix and become osteocytes; these bony matrices are referred to as trabeculae (aka fused spicules). • Woven bone later matures to form lamellar bone, a much tougher form of bone that constitutes both compact bone and spongy bone. Compact Bone • The outer layer: the periosteum. - Comprises columns of compact bone, called osteons. - Centrally, within each osteon, lies a longitudinally-oriented canal, the Haversian (aka central) canal. - Each osteon comprises concentric rings of lamellae. - Osteocytes are a mature form of osteoblast (the bone-producing cells) within the bony matrix. - Internal to the compact bone, lies the endosteum, which comprises in inner circumferential lamellae and the 1 / 7 osteoprogenitor cells, internal to it. Spongy bone* Lies internal to the endosteum and comprises a network of lamellae that do NOT form the Haversian channels and osteons found in compact bone.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 April 2010 TE Prepublication Page 1 Nomina Generalia General Terms
    26 April 2010 TE PrePublication Page 1 Nomina generalia General terms E1.0.0.0.0.0.1 Modus reproductionis Reproductive mode E1.0.0.0.0.0.2 Reproductio sexualis Sexual reproduction E1.0.0.0.0.0.3 Viviparitas Viviparity E1.0.0.0.0.0.4 Heterogamia Heterogamy E1.0.0.0.0.0.5 Endogamia Endogamy E1.0.0.0.0.0.6 Sequentia reproductionis Reproductive sequence E1.0.0.0.0.0.7 Ovulatio Ovulation E1.0.0.0.0.0.8 Erectio Erection E1.0.0.0.0.0.9 Coitus Coitus; Sexual intercourse E1.0.0.0.0.0.10 Ejaculatio1 Ejaculation E1.0.0.0.0.0.11 Emissio Emission E1.0.0.0.0.0.12 Ejaculatio vera Ejaculation proper E1.0.0.0.0.0.13 Semen Semen; Ejaculate E1.0.0.0.0.0.14 Inseminatio Insemination E1.0.0.0.0.0.15 Fertilisatio Fertilization E1.0.0.0.0.0.16 Fecundatio Fecundation; Impregnation E1.0.0.0.0.0.17 Superfecundatio Superfecundation E1.0.0.0.0.0.18 Superimpregnatio Superimpregnation E1.0.0.0.0.0.19 Superfetatio Superfetation E1.0.0.0.0.0.20 Ontogenesis Ontogeny E1.0.0.0.0.0.21 Ontogenesis praenatalis Prenatal ontogeny E1.0.0.0.0.0.22 Tempus praenatale; Tempus gestationis Prenatal period; Gestation period E1.0.0.0.0.0.23 Vita praenatalis Prenatal life E1.0.0.0.0.0.24 Vita intrauterina Intra-uterine life E1.0.0.0.0.0.25 Embryogenesis2 Embryogenesis; Embryogeny E1.0.0.0.0.0.26 Fetogenesis3 Fetogenesis E1.0.0.0.0.0.27 Tempus natale Birth period E1.0.0.0.0.0.28 Ontogenesis postnatalis Postnatal ontogeny E1.0.0.0.0.0.29 Vita postnatalis Postnatal life E1.0.1.0.0.0.1 Mensurae embryonicae et fetales4 Embryonic and fetal measurements E1.0.1.0.0.0.2 Aetas a fecundatione5 Fertilization
    [Show full text]
  • Osteon Mimetic Scaffolding Janay Clytus University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected]
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Senior Theses Honors College Spring 2018 Osteon Mimetic Scaffolding Janay Clytus University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses Part of the Biomaterials Commons, and the Other Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Clytus, Janay, "Osteon Mimetic Scaffolding" (2018). Senior Theses. 252. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/252 This Thesis is brought to you by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clytus 1 Table of Contents Thesis Summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Developmental Processes that Govern Recovery ------------------------------------------------------ 6 Osteogenesis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 Chondrogenesis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Vasculogenesis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Techniques to develop in-vitro vasculature ------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Each Bone Is an Organ
    7 Chapter 7 Karen Webb Smith HOMUNCULUS Unit Two SOME AMAZING BONE FACTS *at birth humans have 300 bones; several fuse together = 206 in adults I. Introduction *half of your bones are in your hands and feet *one person in 20 has an extra rib; this is more common in males A. Bones are very physiologically active tissues. *older people often develop a slight curve in the spine, right-handed B. Each bone is made up of several types of tissues: people curve right, and left-handed people curve left bone tissue, cartilage, dense connective *each bone is beautifully fitted and shaped for its own particular place tissue, blood, & nervous tissue *the last bone to close is the collarbone, between the ages of 18 & 25 *bones carry on all life’s function, they do so more slowly *30% of bone is living tissue, cells, & blood vessels Each bone is an organ. *45% is mineral deposits, mostly calcium phosphate, forms layers of crystals on the surface of a bone & gives bone hardness *25% of bone is water II. Bone Structure A. Bone Classification *long bones – long longitudinal axes & expanded ends = forearm & thigh bones *short bones – cubelike = wrists & ankles *flat bones – broad surface = ribs, scapulae, skull bones *irregular bones – different shapes = vertebrae & facial bones *sesamoid bones – round, small, & nodular = tendons & joints; kneecap B. Parts of a Long Bone long bone example = femur *epiphysis – expanded portion of a long bone that forms a joint (articulation) with another bone *articular cartilage – area of hyaline cartilage that covers the articulating surface of the epiphysis *diaphysis – shaft of the bone located between the epiphyses *periosteum – tough, vascular covering of fibrous tissue that covers the length of the diaphysis; attaches to bones & is continuous with tendons & ligaments; also functions in the formation & repair of bone tissue *processes – bony projections provide sites for ligament & tendon attachments *grooves, openings & depressions – allow passageways for blood vessels, nerves and articulations with other bones (continued next slide) C.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEVELOPMENT of a MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL BASED BIPHASIC OSTEOCHONDRAL TISSUE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCT Scott Am Xson Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 1-2010 THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL BASED BIPHASIC OSTEOCHONDRAL TISSUE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCT Scott aM xson Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Commons Recommended Citation Maxson, Scott, "THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL BASED BIPHASIC OSTEOCHONDRAL TISSUE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCT" (2010). All Dissertations. 684. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/684 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL BASED BIPHASIC OSTEOCHONDRAL TISSUE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCT A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Bioengineering by Scott Anthony Maxson May 2010 Accepted by: Dr. Karen J. L. Burg, Committee Chair Dr. Martine LaBerge Dr. Ted Bateman Dr. James Kellam ABSTRACT The ability of human articular cartilage to respond to injury is poor. Once cartilage damage has occurred, an irreversible degenerative process can occur and will often lead to osteoarthritis (OA). An estimated 26.9 million of U.S. adults are affected by OA. Osteochondral grafting is currently used to treat OA and osteochondral defects; however, complications can develop at the donor site and defect area. Osteochondral tissue engineering provides a potential treatment option and alternative to osteochondral grafting. The long term goal of this work is to develop a tissue engineered mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) based osteochondral construct to repair cartilage damage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Microarchitecture of Lower Limb Long Bones Between Some Animal Models and Humans: a Review
    Veterinarni Medicina, 58, 2013 (7): 339–351 Review Article A comparison of the microarchitecture of lower limb long bones between some animal models and humans: a review V.J. Cvetkovic1, S.J. Najman2, J.S. Rajkovic1, A.Lj. Zabar1, P.J. Vasiljevic1, Lj.B. Djordjevic1, M.D. Trajanovic3 1Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia 3Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia ABSTRACT: Animal models are unavoidable and indispensable research tools in the fields of bone tissue engi- neering and experimental orthopaedics. The fact that there is not ideal animal model as well as the differences in the bone microarchitecture and physiology between animals and humans are complicate factors and make model implementation difficult. Therefore, the tendency should be directed towards extrapolation of the results from one animal model to another or from animal model to humans. So far, this is the first paper which provides an overview on the microarchitecture of lower limb long bones and discusses data related to osteon diameter, osteon canal diameter and their orientation, as well as intracortical canals and trabecular tissue microarchitecture in commonly used animal models compared to humans depending on age, gender and anatomical location of the bone. Understanding the differences between animal model and human bone microarchitecture should enable a more accurate extrapolation of experimental results from one animal model to another or from animal models to humans in the fields of bone tissue engineering and experimental orthopaedics. Also, this should be helpful in making decisions on which animal models are the most suitable for particular preclinical testing.
    [Show full text]