THE SULTANATE V1.01

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE SULTANATE V1.01 THE SULTANATE v1.01 THE SULTANATE For many years, the Sultans of Istanbul have laid claim to the holiest lands of the world and defended them against the depredations of the infidel, the raider and the thief. Grown idle and lazy with the wealth of their realm, the Sultanate for a while appeared in danger of collapsing under the pressure of foreign enemies. Now enriched by the font of knowledge unlocked by the New Learning, the Sultanate has been revitalised as a world power. The New Learning has not been the only revelation received by the Sultan and the Sublime Porte – secret friends of the Sultanate have explained that all is not quite what it seems in this Dystopian Age. A greater threat than the petty sabre-rattling great powers exists, and it is the duty of all to oppose this dark curse before it destroys the world. v1.01 THE SULTANATE [Intercepted epistle from Sircan Osman.] THE OTTOMAN ADVANCE My High Sircan, The modern Sultanate owes its existence to the conquests of the Turkish people begun Greetings under the light of the Allshard! in 1299. At first merely a tribal confederacy From the congregation of the Holy Order under Osman I, the Sultanate soon of Man in the Levant; greetings to High expanded into the rest of the Middle East Sircan Abner from Sircan Osman, may the and the Levant. After 1354, the Ottomans Allshard forever bless us with its revelations. conquered much of the Balkans, becoming First, let me beg your indulgence for I felt a transcontinental power. a written report was the most useful way of Under the leadership of one Sultan fully updating you as to our situation here. Mehmed, called the Conqueror, the The man I have entrusted with this packet Sultanate finally ended the existence is amongst my most dutiful Spica here in of the last vestige of the old Roman Istanbul and I have much confidence that Empire, dismantling all that remained of this packet reached you far swifter than it Byzantine power and eventually breaking might otherwise have. their power entirely with the capture of Secondly, may I communicate my thanks Constantinople itself. for your own recent epistle distributed last From this new capital, the Sultanate and month? Our congregation was enthused by its officials have weathered many crises your words concerning the ever increasing through their history. Many wars and threat posed by the Tainted, and we have campaigns were fought against encroaching redoubled our efforts here to secure our European powers in the Mediterranean – as Order’s position and to bring about the well as many Ottoman attempts to expand final victory. into Europe proper. Under the reign of The situation here in the Sultanate several wise Sultans, the Sultanate also continues to be positive, but I fear we will expanded south and west along the Middle soon reach an uncomfortable moment of Sea and east to the shores of the Iranian crisis. As you have so often warned, only Gulf and the Arabian Sea. by being prepared for an event can we ever These Persian and Arabian conquests had hope to control it. I have tried my best to a major impact on Ottoman culture and place our forces in a position to exploit society. A renaissance of Persian literature whatever should happen here. Nonetheless, sparked resurgence in ancient forms I feel that I would benefit from your own and practices amongst the people of the expertise in this situation. Sultanate and its rulers. They adopted the I hope you will forgive the following title Padishah, meaning “Great King” from historical background, but I feel only by the Persian language – and incorporated explaining the context in which the Order Persian styles and forms into their finds itself today can you truly understand government. Even today, the governors the predicament we face… of provinces are referred to as “Satraps”, whilst military generals of sufficient THE SULTANATE v1.01 wealth and influence may claim the title the presence of Hex taint amongst the outcast of “Spahbed” which conveys suitable and oppressed populations of the Sultanate.] authority over all military dealings in an The Ottoman economy likewise faltered entire province. as the other powers began industrialising. The dominance of the Ottoman Sultans Where once the fine artisan crafts of the over all the holy sites of Islam, Christianity Sultanate would have fetched high prices and Judaism has ensured its spiritual as on the international market, they were now well as political hold over its people. tawdry relics in comparison to the mass- Relaxed toleration laws, particularly when produced goods churned from the factories compared to European norms, helped to of the established powers. Much wealth was develop a culture that cut across religious squandered by the Sultans of this time on lines. Not to mention the wealth brought in personal luxuries and excess and Ottoman by trade between East and West that flowed infrastructure began to crumble and rot through the Ottoman domains. away. Only the Herculean effort of a few reform minded ministers within the Grand THE SICK MAN OF EUROPE Vizierate prevented the Sultanate from collapsing under the weight of its own Such was the strength of the Sultanate that contradictions and being carved up by the many expected her to join the ranks of the other world powers in a feeding frenzy. Great Powers around the dawn of the 19th Century. Yet for all this success in charting THE NEW LEARNING a course amongst the other nations of the world, the Sultanate was not in a strong As with all autocracies, the character of the position after the end of the Prussian Wars. supreme ruler often has a disproportionate effect on the realm that they control. Decades of mismanagement had left the Thus, after decades of weak rulers more Sultanate militarily and economically concerned with their own indulgence than weak. Dissident movements in the Arabian the realm they were supposed to steward, and Persian territories fought on-again off- the Sultanate appeared wracked with again campaigns of politically motivated poverty, crumbling infrastructure and host brigandage. Prussian and Russian to a dissatisfied and fractious populace. expansion threatened to destabilise the Ottoman Balkans, whilst mercenaries took Into this vacuum stepped the late great up the cause of Greek independence. At sea, Sultan Mehmed the Learner, named for Ottoman power waned on both sides of the the conqueror of Istanbul and successor to Dardanelles Straight as both the League perhaps the most dissolute and indulgent of of Italian States and Russia made plays for all the failed Sultans. The previous Sultan, overall dominance in their respective areas. who even now is not named in official The Ottoman military was underfunded histories for his cruelty and debauchery so and poorly equipped, a shadow of the shocked the nation, was Mehmed’s uncle organisation that had once made the walls – and rumours persist that his death was so of Vienna shake. [Postscript: It is likely that decadent as to forbid description for fear much of these disturbances owed something to of embarrassment. With his death, that v1.01 THE SULTANATE line of the family failed, and a new dynasty A SINGLE FLAW was raised to the throne. [Postscript: A Yet Sultan Mehmed did have a flaw; one convenient story. Mehmed was a great man area where he failed to uphold the standards but was not above violence when necessary. In of excellence to which he had striven for truth his uncle likely died at the sharp end of a the duration of his reign. Mehmed the blade travelling at high velocity.] Learner was not a family man, distant from Mehmed the Learner launched himself his children and often by turns spoiling or immediately into a bold reform movement; chastising his progeny to extremes. incorporating many scholars into his Of his many partners during his reign, government. The Sultan himself made Mehmed produced only two children who stringent cuts to the budget allocated for survived to adulthood. The eldest, by his his own personal amusement and ploughed first wife, was Princess Scheherazade – a huge reserves into developing education highly intelligent young woman hardened and technology throughout his realm. The over time by parental neglect. The younger fruits of the “New Learning” were almost of the two, sired from a concubine who immediately felt: rapid modernisation led remains hidden, was Prince Mustafa. to a booming domestic economy, private [Postscript: Ottoman medical science took a incomes soared as wages rose, whilst once while to fully embrace the fruits of the New dwindling support for Ottoman rule Learning – only now can their medical schools rebounded exponentially. truly claim world class.] There were few areas that Mehmed the Scheherazade proved to be as enthusiastic in Learner did not excel in. An accomplished learning as her father, ploughing through scientist, he was at home discussing the rigorous curriculum imposed on her revolutionary new metallurgical methods and demanding more. In her academic as he was discussing theology with the pursuits she sought the attention and praise scholars of Istanbul. His faith in the abilities of her absent father, but in burying herself of his own people was rewarded time and in her studies she made bridging the gulf again, most markedly when Ottoman between the two even harder. The slightest engineers unearthed great petrochemical flaw in her work would bring harsh wealth within the Sultanate’s territory that criticisms that she took to heart, whilst filled the coffers of the government and her greatest successes were damned with permitted further investment. faint praise. [Observation: Forgive the time By the time of Sultan Mehmed’s death in spent sketching her character, but I think such 1858, the Sultanate had experienced a sea- information will be useful in time.] change in its fortunes.
Recommended publications
  • Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
    CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
    [Show full text]
  • The Killing Game: a Theory of Non-Democratic Succession
    Research in Economics 69 (2015) 398–411 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research in Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rie The killing game: A theory of non-democratic succession Georgy Egorov a,n, Konstantin Sonin b,c a Northwestern University, United States b University of Chicago, United States c Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia article info abstract Article history: The winner of a battle for a throne can either execute or spare the loser; if the loser is Received 13 April 2015 spared, he contends the throne in the next period. Executing the losing contender gives Accepted 26 May 2015 the winner a chance to rule uncontested for a while, but then his life is at risk if he loses to Available online 16 July 2015 some future contender who might be, in equilibrium, too frightened to spare him. The Keywords: trade-off is analyzed within a dynamic complete information game, with, potentially, an Non-democracy infinite number of long-term players. In an equilibrium, decisions to execute predecessors Succession depend on the predecessors’ history of executions. With a dynastic rule in place, Execution incentives to kill the predecessor are much higher than in non-hereditary dictatorships. Reputation The historical illustration for our analysis contains a discussion of post-World War II Markov perfect equilibrium politics of execution of deposed leaders and detailed discussion of non-hereditary military dictatorships in Venezuela in 1830–1964, which witnessed dozens of comebacks and no single political execution. & 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of University of Venice. “Who disagrees with our leadership, will get a spit into his face, a blow onto his chin, and, if necessary, a bullet into his head”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Muslim Economic Thinking in the 11Th A.H
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A study of Muslim economic thinking in the 11th A.H. / 17th C.E. century Islahi, Abdul Azim Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75431/ MPRA Paper No. 75431, posted 06 Dec 2016 02:55 UTC Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Research Center King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publising Centre King Abdulaziz University P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia FOREWORD There are numerous works on the history of Islamic economic thought. But almost all researches come to an end in 9th AH/15th CE century. We hardly find a reference to the economic ideas of Muslim scholars who lived in the 16th or 17th century, in works dealing with the history of Islamic economic thought. The period after the 9th/15th century remained largely unexplored. Dr. Islahi has ventured to investigate the periods after the 9th/15th century. He has already completed a study on Muslim economic thinking and institutions in the 10th/16th century (2009). In the mean time, he carried out the study on Muslim economic thinking during the 11th/17th century, which is now in your hand. As the author would like to note, it is only a sketch of the economic ideas in the period under study and a research initiative. It covers the sources available in Arabic, with a focus on the heartland of Islam. There is a need to explore Muslim economic ideas in works written in Persian, Turkish and other languages, as the importance of these languages increased in later periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Musa Çelebi'nin Rumeli'ye Geçişinde Hıristiyan Aktörlerin Rolü
    Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Yıl: 2011/1, Sayı:13 Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences Year: 2011/1, Number:13 MUSA ÇELEBİ’NİN RUMELİ’YE GEÇİŞİNDE HIRİSTİYAN AKTÖRLERİN ROLÜ (1403-1410) Nilgün ELAM ÖZET Musa Çelebi’nin Rumeli’ye geçiş öyküsü Osmanlı kaynaklarında çok kısa ve önemsiz bir olay olarak sunulur. Bu olay Mehmed’in İsfendiyaroğlu ve Mircea ile yaptığı ittifakla gerçekleşmiş kabul ediliyor. Modern araştırmacılar da Osmanlı vakanüvislerinin anlatılarının etkisinde kalmış görünüyorlar. Oysa yeni keşfedilen Bizans ve Latin kaynakları durumun böyle olmadığını ve Musa’nın Rumeli’ye geçirilmesinin çok daha fazla sayıda bir müttefik grubunun ortak operasyonu olduğunu gösteriyor. Bu müttefikler, Bayezid’in şehzadeleri arasındaki mücadele dönemini kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda uzatmayı ve bu statükodan avantaj sağlamak isteyen Hıristiyan ve Müslüman unsurlardı. Balkanlar ve Anadolu’daki aynı aktörler bu ortak girişimlerini Osmanlı tarihinin başka dönemlerinde de tekrarladılar ve başka Osmanlı taht-müddeilerini desteklediler. Bu bağlamda, Musa’nın Rumeli macerası, Osmanlı vak’anüvistlerince(sanki)kasıtlı olarak ‘gizlenen’ daha geniş cepheli Anadolu-Balkan ittifakının ortak eseridir. Anahtar kelimeler: Musa Çelebi, Hıristiyan Aktörler, Osmanlı Devleti, Osmanlı Şehzade Mücadeleleri, Bizans, Balkan, Rumeli MOUSA TSCHELEBI’S REVOLT AND THE ROLE OF CHRISTIAN ACTORS (1403-1410) ABSTRACT The history of Mousa Tschelebi’ transportation to Rumelia is considered as insignificant event in Ottoman sources in very short accounts. In addition, this event has been connected with the alliances which had been made among Mehmed, the rulers of Karaman and Sinope and Vlachian prince. Modern scholars seems to have been following the accounts of Ottoman chroniclers. However, the newly discovered Byzantine, Ottoman and Latin sources say otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanli Devleti'nde Veliahtlik Kurumu
    Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NDE VELİAHTLIK KURUMU (1908-1922) RUHAT ALP Doktora Tezi Ankara, 2018 OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NDE VELİAHTLIK KURUMU (1908-1922) Ruhat Alp Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi Ankara, 2018 v TEŞEKKÜR Uzun ve yorucu bir araştırma süreci ve arşiv mesaisi neticesinde ortaya çıkan bu çalışmada danışmanım Prof. Dr. Mehmet Öz ‘ün katkı, destek ve emeği büyüktür. Haliyle ilminden, sabrından ve birikimiden istifade ettiğim danışmanıma müteşekkirim. Munzur Üniversitesi’nde araştırma görevliliğime denk gelen tezimin yazım sürecinde benden hiçbir desteği esirgemeyen ve kaynakların temininde bana önemli yardımlar sağlayan dostlarım Dr. Öğretim Üyesi Harun Danışmaz’a, Öğretim Görevlisi Tahsin Hazırbulan’a, Araştırma Görevlisi Salih Başkutlu’ya ve Araştırma Görevlisi Harun Korunur’a teşekkür ederim. Ayrıca çalışmamda ailemin yakın ilgi ve desteğini gördüm. Annem, ablam, eşim ve varlığıyla ruhumu aydınlatan kızıma minnet ve şükranla… vi ÖZET ALP, Ruhat. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Veliahtlık Kurumu (1908-1922), Doktora Tezi, Ankara 2018. Altı yüzyılı aşkın bir süre boyunca tarih sahnesinde yerini alan Osmanlılar, tedrici olarak bürokratik karakteri baskın, merkeziyetçi, pratik, reel politik ve akılcı bir monarşi inşa etmede büyük bir maharet göstermişlerdir. Osmanlıların bu başarıyı yakalamalarının ardında yatan sebeplerden birisi de değişen koşulların gerektirdiği kurumsal düzenleme ve yenilikleri yapabilme becerisini gösterebilmeleridir.
    [Show full text]
  • (Self) Fashioning of an Ottoman Christian Prince
    Amanda Danielle Giammanco (SELF) FASHIONING OF AN OTTOMAN CHRISTIAN PRINCE: JACHIA IBN MEHMED IN CONFESSIONAL DIPLOMACY OF THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MA Thesis in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Central European University Budapest CEU eTD Collection May 2015 (SELF) FASHIONING OF AN OTTOMAN CHRISTIAN PRINCE: JACHIA IBN MEHMED IN CONFESSIONAL DIPLOMACY OF THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY by Amanda Danielle Giammanco (United States of America) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner Budapest May 2015 (SELF) FASHIONING OF AN OTTOMAN CHRISTIAN PRINCE: JACHIA IBN MEHMED IN CONFESSIONAL DIPLOMACY OF THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY by Amanda Danielle Giammanco (United States of America) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards
    [Show full text]
  • Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration
    Sultan Ahmed III’s calligraphy of the Basmala: “In the Name of God, the All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate” The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne Note on Transliteration In this work, words in Ottoman Turkish, including the Turkish names of people and their written works, as well as place-names within the boundaries of present-day Turkey, have been transcribed according to official Turkish orthography. Accordingly, c is read as j, ç is ch, and ş is sh. The ğ is silent, but it lengthens the preceding vowel. I is pronounced like the “o” in “atom,” and ö is the same as the German letter in Köln or the French “eu” as in “peu.” Finally, ü is the same as the German letter in Düsseldorf or the French “u” in “lune.” The anglicized forms, however, are used for some well-known Turkish words, such as Turcoman, Seljuk, vizier, sheikh, and pasha as well as place-names, such as Anatolia, Gallipoli, and Rumelia. The Ottoman Sultans Mighty Guests of the Throne SALİH GÜLEN Translated by EMRAH ŞAHİN Copyright © 2010 by Blue Dome Press Originally published in Turkish as Tahtın Kudretli Misafirleri: Osmanlı Padişahları 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Published by Blue Dome Press 535 Fifth Avenue, 6th Fl New York, NY, 10017 www.bluedomepress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Available ISBN 978-1-935295-04-4 Front cover: An 1867 painting of the Ottoman sultans from Osman Gazi to Sultan Abdülaziz by Stanislaw Chlebowski Front flap: Rosewater flask, encrusted with precious stones Title page: Ottoman Coat of Arms Back flap: Sultan Mehmed IV’s edict on the land grants that were deeded to the mosque erected by the Mother Sultan in Bahçekapı, Istanbul (Bottom: 16th century Ottoman parade helmet, encrusted with gems).
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman World ᇹᇺᇹ
    THE OTTOMAN WORLD ᇹᇺᇹ Edited by Christine Woodhead First published by Routledge Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge Third Avenue, New York, NY Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © Christine Woodhead for selection and editorial matter; individual contributions, the contributors. The right of Christine Woodhead to be identified as the author of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections and of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act . All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested. ISBN: –––– (hbk) ISBN: –––– (ebk) Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro by Swales & Willis Ltd, Exeter, Devon CONTENTS ᇹᇺᇹ List of illustrations viii List of maps ix List of tables ix List of contributors X Preface xiv Note on
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Thirty the Ottoman Empire, Judaism, and Eastern Europe to 1648
    Chapter Thirty The Ottoman Empire, Judaism, and Eastern Europe to 1648 In the late fifteenth and the sixteenth centuries, while the Portuguese and Spanish explored the oceans and exploited faraway lands, the eastern Mediterranean was dominated by the Ottomans. Mehmed II had in 1453 taken Constantinople and made it his capital, putting an end to the Byzantine empire. The subsequent Islamizing of Constantinople was abrupt and forceful. Immediately upon taking the city, Mehmed set about to refurbish and enlarge it. The population had evidently declined to fewer than two hundred thousand by the time of the conquest but a century later was approximately half a million, with Muslims constituting a slight majority. Mehmed and his successors offered tax immunity to Muslims, as an incentive for them to resettle in the city. Perhaps two fifths of the population was still Christian in the sixteenth century, and a tenth Jewish (thousands of Jewish families resettled in Constantinople after their expulsion from Spain in 1492). The large and impressive churches of Constantinople were taken over and made into mosques. Most dramatically, Mehmed laid claim to Haghia Sophia, the enormous cathedral that for nine hundred years had been the seat of the patriarch of Constantinople, and ordered its conversion into a mosque. It was reconfigured and rebuilt (it had been in a state of disrepair since an earthquake in 1344), and minarets were erected alongside it. The Orthodox patriarch was eventually placed in the far humbler Church of St. George, in the Phanari or “lighthouse” district of Constantinople. Elsewhere in the city Orthodox Christians were left with relatively small and shabby buildings.1 Expansion of the Ottoman empire: Selim I and Suleiman the Magnificent We have followed - in Chapter 26 - Ottoman military fortunes through the reigns of Mehmed II (1451-81) and Bayezid II (1481-1512).
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Banditry in Ottoman Ayntab (1690-1730)
    TRIBAL BANDITRY IN OTTOMAN AYNTAB (1690-1730) A Master’s Thesis by MUHSİN SOYUDOĞAN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2005 To My Mother TRIBAL BANDITRY IN OTTOMAN AYNTAB (1690-1730) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by MUHSİN SOYUDOĞAN In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2005 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Asst. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Mehmet Öz Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT Tribal Banditry in Ottoman Ayntab (1690-1730) Soyudoğan, Muhsin. M.A., Department of History. Supervisior: Asst. Prof. Oktay Özel. This thesis attempts to understand the tribal banditry through a micro historical analsysis, which focuses on the tribal banditry in Ayntab region during the late seveneteenth and early eighteenth century. Though it focuses on a specific region, it tries to contribute to the discussion on banditry and also tries to develop a model for analyzing banditry in the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc Balikesir Üniversitesi Sosyal
    T.C. BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI 19. YÜZYILDA ŞEHZADE OLMAK: MODERNLEŞME SÜRECİNDE ŞEHZADELER YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Hazırlayan: Füsun Gülsüm GENÇ Balıkesir, 2015 T.C. BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI 19. YÜZYILDA ŞEHZADE OLMAK: MODERNLEŞME SÜRECİNDE ŞEHZADELER YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Hazırlayan: Füsun Gülsüm GENÇ Danışman: Prof. Dr. Bülent ÖZDEMİR Balıkesir, 2015 ÖNSÖZ Osmanlı Devleti’nde tahtın varisleri olmaları nedeniyle çok büyük bir öneme sahip olan şehzadeler aynı zamanda taht için potansiyel bir tehlike oluşturmuştur. Bu nedenle devlet tarihi boyunca sürekli bir denetim altında tutulmuşlardır. Denetimi sağlamak adına yapılan uygulamalar, şehzadelerin hak ve yetkileri ile şehzadelere getirilen kısıtlamalar çağın gereklerine ve yaşanan olaylara göre şekillenmiştir. Çalışmamızda şehzadelerin 19. yüzyıldaki siyasi, sosyal ve ekonomik durumları incelenmiştir. 19. yüzyıl dünyada ve Osmanlı Devleti’nde bir değişim dönemi olduğu için bu çalışma yapılırken Osmanlı Devleti tarihi 19. yüzyıl öncesi ve 19. yüzyıl olarak iki kısımda ele alınmıştır. Kuruluştan 19. yüzyıla kadar olan dönem klasik dönem tabir edilmiş, 19. yüzyıl ise modernleşme süreci olarak kabul edilmiştir. Böyle bir çalışma yapılmasının nedeni modernleşmenin etkisiyle 19. yüzyılda meydana gelen değişimlerin şehzadelik kurumuna da yansımış olması ve şehzadelerin hayatlarında, klasik dönemle kıyaslandığında oldukça büyük farklılıklar meydana gelmesidir. Klasik dönemde şehzadeler ile ilgili çalışmalar yapılmasına
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Muslim Economic Thinking in the 11Th A.H. / 17Th C.E. Century
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Munich Personal RePEc Archive MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive A study of Muslim economic thinking in the 11th A.H. / 17th C.E. century Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75431/ MPRA Paper No. 75431, posted 6 December 2016 02:55 UTC Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Research Center King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publising Centre King Abdulaziz University P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia FOREWORD There are numerous works on the history of Islamic economic thought. But almost all researches come to an end in 9th AH/15th CE century. We hardly find a reference to the economic ideas of Muslim scholars who lived in the 16th or 17th century, in works dealing with the history of Islamic economic thought. The period after the 9th/15th century remained largely unexplored. Dr. Islahi has ventured to investigate the periods after the 9th/15th century. He has already completed a study on Muslim economic thinking and institutions in the 10th/16th century (2009). In the mean time, he carried out the study on Muslim economic thinking during the 11th/17th century, which is now in your hand. As the author would like to note, it is only a sketch of the economic ideas in the period under study and a research initiative. It covers the sources available in Arabic, with a focus on the heartland of Islam.
    [Show full text]