A Acoustic Waves, 97–100 Adams–Williamson Equation, 119–124, 126, 127, 219 Adiabatic Conditions/Processes, 85, 160 Advecti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Acoustic Waves, 97–100 Adams–Williamson Equation, 119–124, 126, 127, 219 Adiabatic Conditions/Processes, 85, 160 Advecti Index A Astronomical Almanac, 43, 66, 231, 238 Acoustic waves, 97–100 Astronomical formulae, 6, 66, 231 Adams–Williamson equation, 119–124, 126, Balmer limit, 74 127, 219 Astronomical unit, 6, 66, 232, 258 Adiabatic conditions/processes, 85, 160 Atmospheric refraction, 20, 257 Advection, 153, 193, 277–279 of temperature, 192 Aerobee rockets, 87, 88 B Albedo Berlage, H.P., 5 bolometric, 145, 161, 164 Bickerton, A.W., 5 Bond, 231 Binary Maker software, 40 geometric, 231, 238, 283 Biosphere, 314 mean, 165 Birkeland, K.O.B., 5 visual, 231 Blagg-Richardson formulation, 7, 37 Alfve´n, H.O.G., 5 Blanchard bone, 1 ALH 84001 (Antarctic meteorite), 310, 311 Bolometric correction (solar), 78 Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, 2 Boltzmann’s constant, 75, 315 Andromeda galaxy (M31), 101 Boundary, core-mantle, 117, 118, 129, 130, Angular momentum, 3, 5, 6, 36, 49, 57, 65, 68, 134, 160, 161, 194–196, 216, 219, 108, 223–228 239, 309 Anticline, 286 Bound-free emission, 73 Apollonius of Perga, 2 Brahe, T., 2–4, 282 Ares, 281 Breccia, 202, 208 Argument of perihelion, 29, 38, 43 Brunt-Va¨isa¨la¨ frequency, 100 Aristarchus of Samos, 2 Buddha, 233 Arrhenius, S.A., 5 Buffon, G.-L.L., 3 Aryabhata, 2 Bulk sound velocity, 195 Asteroids (minor planets) Buoyancy, 90, 97, 152, 193, 270, 271, Ceres, 65, 106, 143 273, 274 Eris, 6 Buoyant frequency, 100 Greek and Trojan, 41 Icarus, 238 Kirkwood gaps, 54 C “rubble pile”, 137 Cameron, A.G.W., 5, 225 trans-Neptunian objects, 138 Capella, M., 2 Vesta, 255 Cell, diamond-anvil, 127, 133, 134, 195 E.F. Milone and W.J.F. Wilson, Solar System Astrophysics: Background Science 323 and the Inner Solar System, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8848-4, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 324 Index Chamberlain, T.C., 5 silicate tetrahedron, 177 Chelyabinsk airburst, 140 tetrahedral holes, 176, 177 Chladni, E.F.F., 3, 4 table salt, 184, 187 Circle Crystallization great, 14, 15, 20, 22, 24, 31, 32, 98, equilibrium, 132, 220 221, 296 fractional, 132, 220 small, 14, 15, 98, 179 Curie point, 127 Coefficient absorption, 79, 80 kinematic viscosity, 152 D thermal de Laplace, P.-S., 52 conduction, 157 Density(ies) expansion, 152, 160 compressed, 108, 127, 238, 282 Communications satellite(s), 48 uncompressed, 108, 190, 191, Convection 252, 253 adiabatic, 160, 253 Descartes, R., 3 chemical, 253 Devonian Period, 52 core Differentiation, 65, 126, 135, 148, 194, 223, Earth, 129 249, 254, 276 Venus, 258 Digital Orrery, 49 mantle Discontinuity Earth, 129, 196, 244 Mohorovicˇic´, 190 Venus, 244, 261 seismic solar, 85 Earth, 114–119, 190 Coordinate system Moon, 213 altazimuth, 20–22 D00 layer, 155, 194–196 ecliptic, 21–22 Dwarf planets, 6, 7, 49, 65, 106, 233, 234 equatorial, 22–24 Dyce, R., 236 horizon, 20, 21 Dynamical migrations, 9 terrestrial, 20, 21 Coordinate transformations ecliptic to equatorial, 22, 42 E equatorial to ecliptic, 22 Earth equatorial to horizon (altazimuth), 21 asthenosphere, 127 horizon (altazimuth) to equatorial, atmosphere, 20, 77, 87, 166 23, 31 central temperature, 159, 258 rectilinear (x, y) to polar, 29 Challenger Deep, 241 Copernicus, N., 2, 3, 233 core Crust, Earth, 126, 132, 151, 156, 184 inner, 125, 128, 131–136 composition, 171, 178–179, 248 outer, 115, 117, 125, 128, 160 Crystal(s) core-mantle interface, 117, 118, 161 density, 175 crust, composition, 171, 178–179, 248 magnesiowu¨stite, 186 densities, 108, 124, 223 perovskite, 185, 186 D00 layer, 194–196 phase, 178, 183–190 dynamic range, 241 post-perovskite, 187 geotherm(s), 133, 145, 160, 161 structure heat flux, 145, 146, 150, 156, 158, 166 cubic close packing, 174, 175 Himalayas, 241, 261 face-centered packing, 171, 174, 175, impact craters, 240, 263 185, 186 interior, 100, 125–136, 145, 148, 151, 169, hexagonal close packing, 173 196, 216 interstitial holes, 175–177 ionosphere, 70, 231, 314 octahedral holes, 176–177 lithosphere, 127, 146, 272, 273 Index 325 low velocity zone, 273 analogue, 19 magnetic field, 127, 128, 131 four-parts, 19 magnetosphere, 217, 231 Fossa(e), 287, 288, 305 mantle, 108, 127, 147, 187, 190, 191, 211, Free-free emission, 73 223, 226, 309 Frequency Marianas trench, 241 Brunt-Va¨isa¨la¨, 100 moment of inertia, 124–125, 151 buoyant, 100 Mt. Everest, 241 Planck function, 74 preliminary reference model, 137 visual radiation, 73 radiated power, 145 seafloor spreading, 127, 272 secular cooling, 148, 149, 279 G seismic waves, 100 Galileo, G., 197 shadow zone, 115, 117 Gauss, K.F., 42, 218 subduction, 127, 272, 273, 275 Geochemical cycle, 171 superplumes, 194 Geo-synchronous satellite(s), 61 temperature gradient, interior, Giant molecular clouds, 9 155–157, 159 Gradient, temperature, 146, 155–157, 159, tidal heating, 150, 151 160, 253 Ellipse Gravitational potential, 108–114, 137, 212, 282 area, 25, 30, 46 energy, 150, 253, 278 definition, 13, 25, 26 Gravity waves, 97, 99 eccentricity, 27, 30, 38 Greenhouse gases, 165, 299 equation, 27, 28, 30, 59 Gutenberg-Richter earthquake magnitude, 119 hyperbola, 30 parabola, 30 properties, 25–31 H Elongation, 141, 233, 237, 256 Hayashi, C., 5 Emission Heat bound-free, 73 accretional, 147, 219, 275, 279 free-free, 73 advection, 153, 192, 193, 277–279 Energy equation (for orbits), 36, 37 from differentiation, 148 Equilibrium, thermal, 157, 279, 315 gravitational, 148, 150 Eris, 6 latent, 150, 157, 189, 192, 193 Eudoxus of Cnidus, 2 lithospheric conduction, 277–278 Eutectic plate tectonics, 269, 277–279 mix(es), 131, 132 primordial, 146–148, 157 phase diagrams, 132, 133 radiogenic, 128, 147, 149, 150, 279 transfer, 278 conductive, 153, 156–157 F convective, 152–153, 156 Faults and folds radiative, 66, 76–78, 145, 232 anticline, 286 transport, 153, 154, 159, 278, 279, 308 fossa(e), 287 Helioseismology, 68, 70, 95–100 graben, 244, 266, 267, 286, 287 Hellenic and Hellenistic times, 1 monocline, 286 Hesperus, 256 normal fault, 244, 286 H– ion(s), 85 strike-slip fault, 286 Hipparchus, 2, 226 syncline, 286 Holes thrust fault, 222, 245, 286 coronal, 89 Filar micrometry, 106 interstitial, 175–177 Forced librations, 251–253 octahedral, 176–177 Formula(e) tetrahedral, 176, 177 326 Index Horus, 233 third, 39, 44, 52, 61, 66, 282 “Hot Jupiters”, 9, 164 limb-darkening, 83, 84 Hoyle, F., 5 Newton’s, 34 Hydrostatic equilibrium, 114, 121, 143 gravitational, 33–35, 50, 61 laws of motion, 33, 61 first, 33 I second, 34, 35 Impact(s) third, 34, 36 energy per unit mass, 137, 139 sine, 13–15, 19, 22, 23, 31, 141 heating, 128, 147 Snell’s, 116 Inanna, 256 Stefan-Boltzmann, 75, 77 Inertia, moment of, 68, 124–125, 150, thermodynamics, 162 151, 212, 228, 244, 252, 253, first law, 278 308, 309 Titius-Bode, 6–8, 65 Ishtar, 256, 265, 267, 268 Blagg-Richardson formulation, 10 Wien’s, 75 Legendre polynomials, 112, J 142–143, 231 Jeans, J.H., 5 associated, 109 Jeffreys, H., 5 Leverrier, Urbain, 234 Jupiter, 6, 9, 39–41, 53, 54, 65, 105, 138, 143, Life forms 164, 227, 233, 277, 281 autotrophs, 313 Jupiter-Saturn long-period inequality, 53 chemolithotrophs, 313 chemoorganotrophs, 313 chemotrophs, 313 K extremophiles, 313 Kant, I., 3, 4 heterotrophs, 313 Kepler, J., 2, 3, 258, 284 phototrophs, 313 Kepler’s equation, 39, 43–48, 60 Light curves, 84 Kepler’s laws, 33, 38 Lomonosov, Mikhail, 259 first, 29, 38 LONGSTOP, 49 second, 36 Lowell, Percival, 259, 281 third, 39, 44, 52, 61, 66, 282 Lyttleton, R.A., 5 Kirkwood gaps, 54 Kuiper Belt, 138 Kuiper, G., 5 M Macroturbulence, 69 Magnetograms, 70 L Magnitude Lagrangian points, 40, 41 absolute, 78, 101 Laplace, P.-S. de, 3, 4, 52 bolometric, 78, 101 Latent heat, 150, 157, 189, 192, 193 visual, 78, 101, 231 Law(s) Mars analogue formula, 19 Alba Patera, 285 angular momentum conservation, 226 albedo, 283 cosine, 13–19, 22, 23, 25, 31 ALH 84001, 310, 311 exponential growth, 126 Amazonis Planitia, 283 Faraday’s, 218 Apsus Valley, 290 Fourier’s, 157 Ares, 281 four-parts formula, 19 Ares Vallis, 289 Kepler’s, 38 Argyre impact basin, 295, 296 first, 29, 38 Arsia Mons, 284 second, 36 Ascraeus Mons, 284 Index 327 Aureum Chaos, 287, 289 Maja Vallis, 289 “blueberries”, blueberry concretions, mass, 306, 308, 309, 314, 315 301, 302 meanders, 289, 290, 293 Borealis basin, 295, 297 Medusa Fossae, 305 brightness, 281 Melas Chasma, 287 canali, 281 Meridiani Planum, 301, 302, 308 “canals”, 106, 281 Metabolic processes canyons and channels, 286, 287, 304 aerobic, 313 Cerberus Fossae, 288 anaerobic, 313 chaotic terrain, 287, 289 endolithic, 314 Chasma Boreale, 304 methanogenic, 314 Chryse impact basin, 295, 300 Newton crater, 307 Chryse Plain, 295, 300 Nix Olympica, 285 Claritas Rupes, 288 Noachis Terra, 283 climate change, 291, 299–306 north celestial pole (NCP), 282 Coprates Chasma, 287 North Pole impact basin, 295, 297 craters, 200, 281, 283, 284, 287, olivine, 301 301–303, 306 Olympus Mons, 241, 283, 285, 305 dendritic channels, 289, 299 Pavonis Mons, 284 dunes, 290, 292, 293, 294, 295, 303 physical and orbital properties, 62 dynamic range, 241 polar cap(s), 293 eccentricity, 282 quadrupole moment, 282 Echus Chasma, 289 rotation, 282 Endurance Crater, 301, 302 Sabis Vallis, 290 etched plains, 289 sandstone, 301 festoons, 301 satellites, 41, 114 flattening, 282 spiders, 293, 294 Gale crater, 303 surface features, 106, 283–296 geologic epochs, 283 Syria Planum, 288 Amazonian, 283, 313 tear-drop shaped islands, 289, 290, 300 Hesperian, 283, 289, 291, 296, 298, 313 Terby Crater, 305 Noachian, 283, 285, 296, 298, 299, 301, Tharsis bulge (Ridge), 284–286, 310, 311 296, 297, 310 Pre-Noachian, 283 tholus, 284 global dichotomy, 285, 296–298 Tithonium Chasma, 287 gravitational acceleration,
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Abulfeda crater chain (Moon), 97 Aphrodite Terra (Venus), 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 Acheron Fossae (Mars), 165 Apohele asteroids, 353–354 Achilles asteroids, 351 Apollinaris Patera (Mars), 168 achondrite meteorites, 360 Apollo asteroids, 346, 353, 354, 361, 371 Acidalia Planitia (Mars), 164 Apollo program, 86, 96, 97, 101, 102, 108–109, 110, 361 Adams, John Couch, 298 Apollo 8, 96 Adonis, 371 Apollo 11, 94, 110 Adrastea, 238, 241 Apollo 12, 96, 110 Aegaeon, 263 Apollo 14, 93, 110 Africa, 63, 73, 143 Apollo 15, 100, 103, 104, 110 Akatsuki spacecraft (see Venus Climate Orbiter) Apollo 16, 59, 96, 102, 103, 110 Akna Montes (Venus), 142 Apollo 17, 95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 110 Alabama, 62 Apollodorus crater (Mercury), 127 Alba Patera (Mars), 167 Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), 110 Aldrin, Edwin (Buzz), 94 Apophis, 354, 355 Alexandria, 69 Appalachian mountains (Earth), 74, 270 Alfvén, Hannes, 35 Aqua, 56 Alfvén waves, 35–36, 43, 49 Arabia Terra (Mars), 177, 191, 200 Algeria, 358 arachnoids (see Venus) ALH 84001, 201, 204–205 Archimedes crater (Moon), 93, 106 Allan Hills, 109, 201 Arctic, 62, 67, 84, 186, 229 Allende meteorite, 359, 360 Arden Corona (Miranda), 291 Allen Telescope Array, 409 Arecibo Observatory, 114, 144, 341, 379, 380, 408, 409 Alpha Regio (Venus), 144, 148, 149 Ares Vallis (Mars), 179, 180, 199 Alphonsus crater (Moon), 99, 102 Argentina, 408 Alps (Moon), 93 Argyre Basin (Mars), 161, 162, 163, 166, 186 Amalthea, 236–237, 238, 239, 241 Ariadaeus Rille (Moon), 100, 102 Amazonis Planitia (Mars), 161 COPYRIGHTED
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience and a Lunar Base
    " t N_iSA Conference Pubhcatmn 3070 " i J Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Explora, tion unclas HI/VI 02907_4 at ,unar | !' / | .... ._-.;} / [ | -- --_,,,_-_ |,, |, • • |,_nrrr|l , .l -- - -- - ....... = F _: .......... s_ dd]T_- ! JL --_ - - _ '- "_r: °-__.......... / _r NASA Conference Publication 3070 Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Exploration Edited by G. Jeffrey Taylor Institute of Meteoritics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Paul D. Spudis U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Astrogeology Flagstaff, Arizona Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., and held at the Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas August 25-26, 1988 IW_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division 1990 PREFACE This report was produced at the request of Dr. Michael B. Duke, Director of the Solar System Exploration Division of the NASA Johnson Space Center. At a meeting of the Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST), Dr. Duke (at the time also Science Director of the Office of Exploration, NASA Headquarters) suggested that future lunar geoscience activities had not been planned systematically and that geoscience goals for the lunar base program were not articulated well. LAPST is a panel that advises NASA on lunar sample allocations and also serves as an advocate for lunar science within the planetary science community. LAPST took it upon itself to organize some formal geoscience planning for a lunar base by creating a document that outlines the types of missions and activities that are needed to understand the Moon and its geologic history.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surfaces
    Chapter 4 PLANETARY SURFACES 4.1 The Absence of Bedrock A striking and obvious observation is that at full Moon, the lunar surface is bright from limb to limb, with only limited darkening toward the edges. Since this effect is not consistent with the intensity of light reflected from a smooth sphere, pre-Apollo observers concluded that the upper surface was porous on a centimeter scale and had the properties of dust. The thickness of the dust layer was a critical question for landing on the surface. The general view was that a layer a few meters thick of rubble and dust from the meteorite bombardment covered the surface. Alternative views called for kilometer thicknesses of fine dust, filling the maria. The unmanned missions, notably Surveyor, resolved questions about the nature and bearing strength of the surface. However, a somewhat surprising feature of the lunar surface was the completeness of the mantle or blanket of debris. Bedrock exposures are extremely rare, the occurrence in the wall of Hadley Rille (Fig. 6.6) being the only one which was observed closely during the Apollo missions. Fragments of rock excavated during meteorite impact are, of course, common, and provided both samples and evidence of co,mpetent rock layers at shallow levels in the mare basins. Freshly exposed surface material (e.g., bright rays from craters such as Tycho) darken with time due mainly to the production of glass during micro- meteorite impacts. Since some magnetic anomalies correlate with unusually bright regions, the solar wind bombardment (which is strongly deflected by the magnetic anomalies) may also be responsible for darkening the surface [I].
    [Show full text]
  • Warren and Taylor-2014-In Tog-The Moon-'Author's Personal Copy'.Pdf
    This article was originally published in Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edition published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non- commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Warren P.H., and Taylor G.J. (2014) The Moon. In: Holland H.D. and Turekian K.K. (eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edition, vol. 2, pp. 213-250. Oxford: Elsevier. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy 2.9 The Moon PH Warren, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA GJ Taylor, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI, USA ã 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This article is a revision of the previous edition article by P. H. Warren, volume 1, pp. 559–599, © 2003, Elsevier Ltd. 2.9.1 Introduction: The Lunar Context 213 2.9.2 The Lunar Geochemical Database 214 2.9.2.1 Artificially Acquired Samples 214 2.9.2.2 Lunar Meteorites 214 2.9.2.3 Remote-Sensing Data 215 2.9.3 Mare Volcanism
    [Show full text]
  • Feature of the Month – January 2016 Galilaei
    A PUBLICATION OF THE LUNAR SECTION OF THE A.L.P.O. EDITED BY: Wayne Bailey [email protected] 17 Autumn Lane, Sewell, NJ 08080 RECENT BACK ISSUES: http://moon.scopesandscapes.com/tlo_back.html FEATURE OF THE MONTH – JANUARY 2016 GALILAEI Sketch and text by Robert H. Hays, Jr. - Worth, Illinois, USA October 26, 2015 03:32-03:58 UT, 15 cm refl, 170x, seeing 8-9/10 I sketched this crater and vicinity on the evening of Oct. 25/26, 2015 after the moon hid ZC 109. This was about 32 hours before full. Galilaei is a modest but very crisp crater in far western Oceanus Procellarum. It appears very symmetrical, but there is a faint strip of shadow protruding from its southern end. Galilaei A is the very similar but smaller crater north of Galilaei. The bright spot to the south is labeled Galilaei D on the Lunar Quadrant map. A tiny bit of shadow was glimpsed in this spot indicating a craterlet. Two more moderately bright spots are east of Galilaei. The western one of this pair showed a bit of shadow, much like Galilaei D, but the other one did not. Galilaei B is the shadow-filled crater to the west. This shadowing gave this crater a ring shape. This ring was thicker on its west side. Galilaei H is the small pit just west of B. A wide, low ridge extends to the southwest from Galilaei B, and a crisper peak is south of H. Galilaei B must be more recent than its attendant ridge since the crater's exterior shadow falls upon the ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Review Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2 Thresholds
    1 Peer Review Draft 2 Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2 3 Thresholds of Change in Ecosystems 4 Authors: Daniel B. Fagre (lead author), Colleen W. Charles, Craig 5 D. Allen, Charles Birkeland, F. Stuart Chapin, III, Peter M. 6 Groffman, Glenn R. Guntenspergen, Alan K. Knapp, A. David 7 McGuire, Patrick J. Mulholland, Debra P.C. Peters, Daniel D. 8 Roby, and George Sugihara 9 Contributing authors: Brandon T. Bestelmeyer, Julio L. 10 Betancourt, Jeffrey E. Herrick, and Douglas S. Kenney 11 U.S. Climate Change Science Program 12 Draft 5.0 SAP 4.2 9/26/2008 1 1 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 5 3 Introduction................................................................................................................... 5 4 Definitions.....................................................................................................................5 5 Development of Threshold Concepts............................................................................ 6 6 Principles of Thresholds ............................................................................................... 7 7 Case Studies.................................................................................................................. 8 8 Potential Management Responses............................................................................... 10 9 Recommendations......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Winds in the Lower Cloud Level on the Nightside of Venus from VIRTIS-M (Venus Express) 1.74 Μm Images
    atmosphere Article Winds in the Lower Cloud Level on the Nightside of Venus from VIRTIS-M (Venus Express) 1.74 µm Images Dmitry A. Gorinov * , Ludmila V. Zasova, Igor V. Khatuntsev, Marina V. Patsaeva and Alexander V. Turin Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (L.V.Z.); [email protected] (I.V.K.); [email protected] (M.V.P.); [email protected] (A.V.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The horizontal wind velocity vectors at the lower cloud layer were retrieved by tracking the displacement of cloud features using the 1.74 µm images of the full Visible and InfraRed Thermal Imaging Spectrometer (VIRTIS-M) dataset. This layer was found to be in a superrotation mode with a westward mean speed of 60–63 m s−1 in the latitude range of 0–60◦ S, with a 1–5 m s−1 westward deceleration across the nightside. Meridional motion is significantly weaker, at 0–2 m s−1; it is equatorward at latitudes higher than 20◦ S, and changes its direction to poleward in the equatorial region with a simultaneous increase of wind speed. It was assumed that higher levels of the atmosphere are traced in the equatorial region and a fragment of the poleward branch of the direct lower cloud Hadley cell is observed. The fragment of the equatorward branch reveals itself in the middle latitudes. A diurnal variation of the meridional wind speed was found, as east of 21 h local time, the direction changes from equatorward to poleward in latitudes lower than 20◦ S.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]