DOCSLIB.ORG

Mercury Redux

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mercury Redux FEATURE Mercury redux In January 2008, 33 years after Mariner 10 fl ew past the solar system’s innermost planet, MESSENGER crossed Mercury’s magnetosphere. Ancient volcanoes, contractional faults, and a rich soup of exospheric ions give clues to Mercury’s structure and dynamical evolution. Th e Mercury fl yby of the MESSENGER two have not been ruled out, but for those (Mercury surface, space environment, mechanisms shorter-wavelength magnetic geochemistry and ranging) probe was the features would be expected, which were not fi rst of three braking manoeuvres for the observed during the MESSENGER fl yby1. spacecraft , in preparation for its insertion Recent libration observations that require into a polar orbit in 2011. Th e probe a partially molten core11, and the limited achieved the closest approach (201 km) of contraction of Mercury, which implies a Mercury’s surface yet, and took a variety largely molten core, favour a convective of measurements in the magnetosphere, dynamo origin for Mercury’s magnetic fi eld. exosphere and on Mercury’s surface. Some Although Mercury’s magnetosphere of the fi rst results of the MESSENGER looks like a miniature version of Earth’s, mission1–6 reveal Mercury as a planet with Mercury’s relatively weak magnetic richly interconnected dynamics, from fi eld implies that its dynamo must work the dynamo in its molten outer core, a diff erently from that of the Earth. Th e crust and surface with great lobate faults geodynamo, which gives the Earth its and relatively young volcanoes, to a strong magnetic fi eld, is thought to operate magnetosphere that interacts with the core in a magnetostrophic regime in which the dynamo and the interplanetary solar wind. Figure 1 Four images of Mercury. The more colourful Coriolis force, due to the Earth’s rotation, Until the mid-1970s, it was thought image in the northeast shows the Caloris basin, a large roughly balances the magnetic Lorentz that Earth was the only planet inside the impact crater. Bright gold-coloured features near the force. Such a balance may also operate asteroid belt with an internally generated Caloris basin’s rim are interpreted to be volcanos6. Red in Mercury’s core. Indeed, several recent global magnetosphere. Scientists boxes: One volcano with a central vent is surrounded modelling eff orts have shown that there are were astonished when the Mariner 10 by a smooth dome. Green boxes: A major lobate many ways for dynamos, even ones with spacecraft sent evidence of a global contractional fault about 650 km long called Beagle strong internal fi elds, to produce relatively magnetic fi eld enveloping Mercury. Rupes, in a region of Mercury imaged for the fi rst time weak external (that is, measurable) Space missions to the outer planets have by MESSENGER’s Mercury Dual Imaging System, is magnetic fi elds12–16. revealed global magnetism on Jupiter, shown in the equatorial West near the terminator. Images One way to produce a weak external Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, and even a courtesy of NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied magnetic fi eld is with a slow planetary few planetary satellites. Of the terrestrial Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington. rotation rate. Numerical simulations have bodies, only Mercury and Earth have shown that when rotational forces are too signifi cant internally generated magnetic weak to maintain large scale convection fi elds. It is not known whether Venus and vortices, the magnetic fi eld structure, which the Moon had intrinsic fi elds in the past. January 2008 was equatorial, and new tends to follow the fl ow fi eld, becomes Th e Moon has patches of magnetized information about the high latitudes must small-scale. Th is eff ect leads to a multipolar crust, and evidence of a past venusian therefore wait until orbital insertion in dynamo with a sharply reduced dipolar dynamo may have been wiped out because 2011. Nevertheless, MESSENGER largely component. Assuming that the dynamos its surface temperature of 730 Kelvin confi rmed the Mariner 10 observations and of Earth and Mercury have driving forces is near the Curie point, above which provided additional constraints on the fi eld that scale similarly, Mercury’s slow rotation remanent magnetism cannot persist. morphology. Th e modelled observations (its sidereal day is 58.6 Earth days) means Strong magnetic anomalies indicate an yield a surface fi eld of 230–290 nT that that its dynamo is expected to operate in the ancient global fi eld on Mars, but it is is primarily dipolar. However, additional multipolar regime12. Given the uncertainty thought that the martian dynamo ceased higher multipolar contributions could in the relative contributions of dipolar and to operate early in the planet’s evolution, account for up to half the magnetic fi eld multipolar components, and that the higher perhaps over 4 billion years ago. strength1. Th is magnetic fi eld, although multipolar components decay more rapidly suffi cient to form a global magnetosphere, outward from the outer core source region, MAGNETIC FIELD AND CORE DYNAMICS has a surface strength only roughly 1/100 the MESSENGER observations indicating a that of the Earth. dipolar external fi eld could still be consistent Mercury’s magnetic fi eld, as observed by Th ree types of mechanisms are currently with a multipolar core dynamo. the two fl ybys of the Mariner 10 spacecraft considered plausible candidates for the For a diff erent class of models, that penetrated the magnetosphere generation of Mercury’s intrinsic magnetic Mercury’s weak global fi eld can be (one of which was a polar pass), had fi eld: coherently distributed remanent produced by a dipolar or multipolar a magnitude of roughly 300 nT at the magnetization of the crust8, a thermoelectric dynamo that is constrained to a small surface7. Th e fl yby of MESSENGER in dynamo9 or a convective dynamo10. Th e fi rst volume of its large core. Th is can be 564 nature geoscience | VOL 1 | SEPTEMBER 2008 | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. FEATURE accomplished in several ways, including Magnetotail fl ow in a thick liquid shell, in which strong convection is regionalized near a small inner core13, or alternatively through convection in a thin shell, which tends to Magnetopause generate magnetic fl ux more effi ciently at low latitudes14. Further reductions in Core magnetic fi eld strength occur if the upper part of the liquid outer core is stably stratifi ed. In that case the magnetic fi eld, Mantle Regolith produced by compositional convection and confi ned near the inner-core boundary, is strongly attenuated by the stratifi ed 15 layer above . Finally, if solidifi cation Bow shock Cusp occurs away from the inner-core boundary, convection could be restricted to a thin layer above the horizon of iron precipitation, which ‘snows’ down to the deeper core16. From the available data it is not yet possible to distinguish between MESSENGER orbit these various possibilities. CONTRACTION AND INNER-CORE GROWTH Because Mercury’s contraction places constraints on the fraction of melt in Figure 2 Modelling perspective of dynamical processes of Mercury’s magnetosphere and core. Purple lines its core, the planet’s surface tectonics, are orbit trajectories planned for MESSENGER when it arrives in 2011. Magnetosphere dynamics taken from a cratering and history of volcanism are magnetohydrodynamical simulation of the interaction of the solar wind magnetic fi eld with a dipolar intrinsic intimately related to inferences about the magnetic fi eld19 are visualized. Magnetic fi eld lines are shown in white. Plasma pressure is shown in meridional growth of the inner core, the operation plane through the magnetosphere: red and blue indicate high and low pressure respectively. Core dynamics of the dynamo and the planet’s thermal are taken from a numerical dynamo simulation that produces a dipolar magnetic fi eld12. Isosurfaces of the fl uid evolution. In its January 2008 fl yby, vorticity component parallel to the planetary rotation axis are shown in the outer core. Red and blue vortices MESSENGER imaged 21% of Mercury’s indicate prograde and retrograde convective fl ow. The inner core is shown as a silver sphere. Artistic visualization surface that had never before been and model rendering by Chris Want. observed by a spacecraft . Moreover, in areas previously imaged by Mariner 10, diff erent lighting conditions allowed MESSENGER to reveal new relationships between volcanic fl ows, have been observed in the Given the large uncertainties in core contractional faults and volcanic plains. Mariner 10 and MESSENGER images. formation, and additional uncertainties Th e discovery of additional contractional Some images also show younger craters in how much observed contraction was faults, such as the contractional lobate overprinting contractional scarps. Th e due to mantle and lithosphere cooling, it fault called Beagle Rupes (Fig. 1), results new MESSENGER images now reveal is diffi cult to estimate the total amount of in estimates of global surface contraction more detailed features, including the core solidifi cation precisely. Nevertheless, that are about a third higher than those embayment of lobate faults by volcanic the observationally inferred contraction based on the Mariner 10 observations2. fl ows2. Th ese observations show that of less than 3 km is small compared to the At present the total radial contraction contractional faulting commenced before 17 km of contraction estimated to result estimated from lobate faults is less than many of the volcanic plains were emplaced if the entire core were solidifi ed17. Th is 3 km. However, the increased contraction and continued aft er the eruption of the is consistent with a dynamo origin for inferred from MESSENGER’s observations younger volcanics. Mercury’s magnetic fi eld. Furthermore, must be considered a lower bound.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Triton: Topography and Geology of a Probable Ocean World with Comparison to Pluto and Charon
    remote sensing Article Triton: Topography and Geology of a Probable Ocean World with Comparison to Pluto and Charon Paul M. Schenk 1,* , Chloe B. Beddingfield 2,3, Tanguy Bertrand 3, Carver Bierson 4 , Ross Beyer 2,3, Veronica J. Bray 5, Dale Cruikshank 3 , William M. Grundy 6, Candice Hansen 7, Jason Hofgartner 8 , Emily Martin 9, William B. McKinnon 10, Jeffrey M. Moore 3, Stuart Robbins 11 , Kirby D. Runyon 12 , Kelsi N. Singer 11 , John Spencer 11, S. Alan Stern 11 and Ted Stryk 13 1 Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058, USA 2 SETI Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94020, USA; chloe.b.beddingfi[email protected] (C.B.B.); [email protected] (R.B.) 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (T.B.); [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (J.M.M.) 4 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85202, USA; [email protected] 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85641, USA; [email protected] 6 Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA; [email protected] 7 Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85704, USA; [email protected] 8 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91001, USA; [email protected] 9 National Air & Space Museum, Washington, DC 20001, USA; [email protected] 10 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63101, USA; [email protected] 11 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80301, USA; [email protected] (S.R.); [email protected] (K.N.S.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (S.A.S.) Citation: Schenk, P.M.; Beddingfield, 12 Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20707, USA; [email protected] 13 C.B.; Bertrand, T.; Bierson, C.; Beyer, Humanities Division, Roane State Community College, Harriman, TN 37748, USA; [email protected] R.; Bray, V.J.; Cruikshank, D.; Grundy, * Correspondence: [email protected] W.M.; Hansen, C.; Hofgartner, J.; et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Ganiki Planitia Quadrangle (V–14), Venus Eric B
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Faculty Publications and Research Pomona Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2011 Geologic Map of the Ganiki Planitia Quadrangle (V–14), Venus Eric B. Grosfils Pomona College Sylvan M. Long Elizabeth M. Venechuk Debra M. Hurwitz Joseph W. Richards See next page for additional authors Recommended Citation Grosfils, E.B., Long, S.M., Venechuk, E.M., Hurwitz, D.M., Richards, J.W., Kastl, Brian, Drury, D.E., and Hardin, Johanna, 2011, Geologic map of the Ganiki Planitia quadrangle (V-14), Venus: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific nI vestigations Map 3121. This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Eric B. Grosfils, Sylvan M. Long, Elizabeth M. Venechuk, Debra M. Hurwitz, Joseph W. Richards, Brian Kastl, Dorothy E. Drury, and Johanna S. Hardin This report is available at Scholarship @ Claremont: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_fac_pub/303 Prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Geologic Map of the Ganiki Planitia Quadrangle (V–14), Venus By Eric B. Grosfils, Sylvan M. Long, Elizabeth M. Venechuk, Debra M. Hurwitz, Joseph W. Richards, Brian Kastl, Dorothy E. Drury, and Johanna Hardin Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3121 75° 75° V–1 V–3 V–6 50° 50° V–4 V–5 V–11 V–16 V–12 V–15 V–13 V–14 25° 25° V–23 V–28 V–24 V–27 V–25 V–26 90° 120° 150° 180° 210° 240° 270° 0° 0° V–37 V–38 V–36 V–39 V–35 V–40 –25° –25° V–49 V–50 V–48 V–51 V–47 V–52 V–58 V–59 –50° –50° V–57 V–60 2011 V–62 –75° –75° U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Late movement of basin-edge lobate scarps on Mercury Journal Item How to cite: Fegan, E. R.; Rothery, D. A.; Marchi, S.; Massironi, M.; Conway, S. J. and Anand, M. (2017). Late movement of basin-edge lobate scarps on Mercury. Icarus, 288 pp. 226–324. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2017 Elsevier Inc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Accepted Manuscript Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.005 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk 1 Late movement of basin-edge lobate scarps on Mercury 2 Fegan E.R.1*, Rothery D.A.1, Marchi S.2, Massironi M.3, Conway S.J.1,4, Anand M.1,5, 3 1Department of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK. 2NASA 4 Lunar Science Institute, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA. 3Dipartimento di 5 Geoscienze, Università di Padova, Via Giotto 1, 35137 Padova, Italy. 4LPG Nantes - UMR CNRS 6112, 2 rue de la 6 Houssinière - BP 92208, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France 5Department of Earth Science, The Natural History 7 Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK. 8 9 *Corresponding author (email: [email protected]) 10 Keywords: Planetary; geology; Mercury; tectonics; model ages; lobate scarps; planetary volcanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Torrid Mercury's Icy Poles
    Fire and ice The MESSENGER spacecraft reveals water ice lurking in Torrid Mercury’s icy poles deeply shadowed craters near the innermost planet’s poles. by James Oberg Color explodes from Mercury’s surface in this enhanced-color mosaic. The yellow and orange hues signify relatively young volcanic plains, while blue represents older terrain. The planet’s equator runs horizon- he saga of water ice hiding in GEochemistry, and Ranging — started Planetary scientist David Paige of the works best when good observations are tally through the center of this image; the poles lie at top and bottom. NASA/JHUAPL/CIW the shadows on Mercury ranks orbiting Mercury in March 2011 and has University of California, Los Angeles, a guided by theory.” among the most fascinating been returning reams of data ever since. participating scientist on the MESSENGER During the past several decades, scien- chapters in the history of plan- The discovery of ice contains its own sur- project, stresses the wider significance of tists have come to realize that a conspiracy to the planet nearly 40 years ago, could not Untangling Mercury’s web etary exploration. And the prises and new mysteries. the ice story. “The Mercury discoveries of freak accidents involving Mercury’s make the observations necessary to prove It took centuries for astronomers to deci- story didn’t end a year ago Scientists had suspected for decades that demonstrate the power of theory and motion and orientation had created small the case. Still, radar observations from pher Mercury’s physical and dynamic when scientists using NASA’s water ice might survive in corners of the imagination in astronomy and planetary regions on the planet’s surface where it Earth did detect unusually reflective characteristics and to understand their MESSENGER spacecraft con- solar system’s innermost world.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Planetary Exploration
    **EU5 Chap 2(263-300) 2/20/03 1:16 PM Page 263 Chapter Two NASA and Planetary Exploration by Amy Paige Snyder Prelude to NASA’s Planetary Exploration Program Four and a half billion years ago, a rotating cloud of gaseous and dusty material on the fringes of the Milky Way galaxy flattened into a disk, forming a star from the inner- most matter. Collisions among dust particles orbiting the newly-formed star, which humans call the Sun, formed kilometer-sized bodies called planetesimals which in turn aggregated to form the present-day planets.1 On the third planet from the Sun, several billions of years of evolution gave rise to a species of living beings equipped with the intel- lectual capacity to speculate about the nature of the heavens above them. Long before the era of interplanetary travel using robotic spacecraft, Greeks observing the night skies with their eyes alone noticed that five objects above failed to move with the other pinpoints of light, and thus named them planets, for “wan- derers.”2 For the next six thousand years, humans living in regions of the Mediterranean and Europe strove to make sense of the physical characteristics of the enigmatic planets.3 Building on the work of the Babylonians, Chaldeans, and Hellenistic Greeks who had developed mathematical methods to predict planetary motion, Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria put forth a theory in the second century A.D. that the planets moved in small circles, or epicycles, around a larger circle centered on Earth.4 Only partially explaining the planets’ motions, this theory dominated until Nicolaus Copernicus of present-day Poland became dissatisfied with the inadequacies of epicycle theory in the mid-sixteenth century; a more logical explanation of the observed motions, he found, was to consider the Sun the pivot of planetary orbits.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Impact Basins on Mercury: Global Distribution, Characteristics, and Modification History from MESSENGER Orbital Data Caleb I
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117, E00L08, doi:10.1029/2012JE004154, 2012 Large impact basins on Mercury: Global distribution, characteristics, and modification history from MESSENGER orbital data Caleb I. Fassett,1 James W. Head,2 David M. H. Baker,2 Maria T. Zuber,3 David E. Smith,3,4 Gregory A. Neumann,4 Sean C. Solomon,5,6 Christian Klimczak,5 Robert G. Strom,7 Clark R. Chapman,8 Louise M. Prockter,9 Roger J. Phillips,8 Jürgen Oberst,10 and Frank Preusker10 Received 6 June 2012; revised 31 August 2012; accepted 5 September 2012; published 27 October 2012. [1] The formation of large impact basins (diameter D ≥ 300 km) was an important process in the early geological evolution of Mercury and influenced the planet’s topography, stratigraphy, and crustal structure. We catalog and characterize this basin population on Mercury from global observations by the MESSENGER spacecraft, and we use the new data to evaluate basins suggested on the basis of the Mariner 10 flybys. Forty-six certain or probable impact basins are recognized; a few additional basins that may have been degraded to the point of ambiguity are plausible on the basis of new data but are classified as uncertain. The spatial density of large basins (D ≥ 500 km) on Mercury is lower than that on the Moon. Morphological characteristics of basins on Mercury suggest that on average they are more degraded than lunar basins. These observations are consistent with more efficient modification, degradation, and obliteration of the largest basins on Mercury than on the Moon. This distinction may be a result of differences in the basin formation process (producing fewer rings), relaxation of topography after basin formation (subduing relief), or rates of volcanism (burying basin rings and interiors) during the period of heavy bombardment on Mercury from those on the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • First Look at Mercury
    PLANETARY SCIENCE Mariner 10 was launched to Mercury by way of Venus on November 3, 1973. It was not the first probe to visit Venus. Both the United States and the Soviet Union previously have sent probes to that mysterious, cloud-shrouded planet. However, Mariner 10 was the first to photographically explore the close-up appearance of the planet, and did so both in visibIe and in ultraviolet light. And Mariner 10 was the first probe of any kind to penetrate interplanetary space beyond the orbit of Venus and to achieve a close look at the planet Mercury. First Look Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? There basically are two kinds of reasons. The first is simple and profound and at Mercury difficult to quantify: The very act of exploration is a positive, cultural activity. No one knows what is going to be found. Finding out what Mercury, what Mars, or BRUCE C. MURRAY what the moon is really like, enlarges the consciousness of all the people who partake of that new reality. TV pictures are of special importance because they provide a way both for the scientist to discover features and concepts he could not have imagined and for the public to directly appreciate and participate in the exploration of a new world. Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? But there are more specific scientific objectives as well. For Mercury, the basic-and anomalous-scientific fact is A planetary scientist that it is a very dense planet: It contains a great amount of tells what the voyage mass for its size.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italic denote Figures. Page numbers in bold denote Tables. ‘a’a lava 15, 82, 86 Belgica Rupes 272, 275 Ahsabkab Vallis 80, 81, 82, 83 Beta Regio, Bouguer gravity anomaly Aino Planitia 11, 14, 78, 79, 83 332, 333 Akna Montes 12, 14 Bhumidevi Corona 78, 83–87 Alba Mons 31, 111 Birt crater 378, 381 Alba Patera, flank terraces 185, 197 Blossom Rupes fold-and-thrust belt 4, 274 Albalonga Catena 435, 436–437 age dating 294–309 amors 423 crater counting 296, 297–300, 301, 302 ‘Ancient Thebit’ 377, 378, 388–389 lobate scarps 291, 292, 294–295 anemone 98, 99, 100, 101 strike-slip kinematics 275–277, 278, 284 Angkor Vallis 4,5,6 Bouguer gravity anomaly, Venus 331–332, Annefrank asteroid 427, 428, 433 333, 335 anorthosite, lunar 19–20, 129 Bransfield Rift 339 Antarctic plate 111, 117 Bransfield Strait 173, 174, 175 Aphrodite Terra simple shear zone 174, 178 Bouguer gravity anomaly 332, 333, 335 Bransfield Trough 174, 175–176 shear zones 335–336 Breksta Linea 87, 88, 89, 90 Apollinaris Mons 26,30 Brumalia Tholus 434–437 apollos 423 Arabia, mantle plumes 337, 338, 339–340, 342 calderas Arabia Terra 30 elastic reservoir models 260 arachnoids, Venus 13, 15 strike-slip tectonics 173 Aramaiti Corona 78, 79–83 Deception Island 176, 178–182 Arsia Mons 111, 118, 228 Mars 28,33 Artemis Corona 10, 11 Caloris basin 4,5,6,7,9,59 Ascraeus Mons 111, 118, 119, 205 rough ejecta 5, 59, 60,62 age determination 206 canali, Venus 82 annular graben 198, 199, 205–206, 207 Canary Islands flank terraces 185, 187, 189, 190, 197, 198, 205 lithospheric flexure
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAPS of the OLYMPUS MONS REGION of MARS by Elliot C. Morris and Kenneth L. Tanaka
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE OLYMPUS MONS REGION OF MARS By Elliot C. Morris and Kenneth L. Tanaka Prepared for the NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ..... t\:) a 0 a0 0 0 )> z 0 ..... ..... MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS SERIES a 0 Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1994 a0 0 0 3: ~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-2327 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE OLYMPUS MONS REGION OF MARS By Elliot C. Morris and Kenneth L. Tanaka INTRODUCTION measurements of relief valuable in determining such factors as Olympus Mons is one of the broadest volcanoes and volcano volume, structural offsets, and lava-flow rheology. certainly the tallest in the Solar System. It has been extensively Except for the difference in extent of the areas mapped, the described and analyzed in scientific publications and frequently topographic information, the cartographic control (latitudes noted in the popular and nontechnical literature of Mars. and longitudes of features may differ by as much as a few tenths However, the first name given to the feature-Nix Olympica of a degree), and the greater detail permitted by the larger scale (Schiaparelli, 1879)-was based on its albedo, not its size, base, the two maps are virtually the same. A comparison of our because early telescopic observations of Mars revealed only map units with those of other Viking-based maps is given in albedo features and not topography (lnge and others, 1971). table 1. After Mariner 9 images acquired in 1971 showed that this Unravellng the geology of the Olympus Mons region is not albedo feature coincides with a giant shield volcano (McCauley limited to a simple exercise in stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]