DOCSLIB.ORG

Torrid Mercury's Icy Poles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Torrid Mercury's Icy Poles Fire and ice The MESSENGER spacecraft reveals water ice lurking in Torrid Mercury’s icy poles deeply shadowed craters near the innermost planet’s poles. by James Oberg Color explodes from Mercury’s surface in this enhanced-color mosaic. The yellow and orange hues signify relatively young volcanic plains, while blue represents older terrain. The planet’s equator runs horizon- he saga of water ice hiding in GEochemistry, and Ranging — started Planetary scientist David Paige of the works best when good observations are tally through the center of this image; the poles lie at top and bottom. NASA/JHUAPL/CIW the shadows on Mercury ranks orbiting Mercury in March 2011 and has University of California, Los Angeles, a guided by theory.” among the most fascinating been returning reams of data ever since. participating scientist on the MESSENGER During the past several decades, scien- chapters in the history of plan- The discovery of ice contains its own sur- project, stresses the wider significance of tists have come to realize that a conspiracy to the planet nearly 40 years ago, could not Untangling Mercury’s web etary exploration. And the prises and new mysteries. the ice story. “The Mercury discoveries of freak accidents involving Mercury’s make the observations necessary to prove It took centuries for astronomers to deci- story didn’t end a year ago Scientists had suspected for decades that demonstrate the power of theory and motion and orientation had created small the case. Still, radar observations from pher Mercury’s physical and dynamic when scientists using NASA’s water ice might survive in corners of the imagination in astronomy and planetary regions on the planet’s surface where it Earth did detect unusually reflective characteristics and to understand their MESSENGER spacecraft con- solar system’s innermost world. Theorists science,” he says. “However, just because ought to be cold enough for ice to form and regions in Mercury’s polar regions that implications. Although the planet lies rea- firmed the existence of ice in craters near realized that cold regions could exist in something might be there doesn’t necessar- survive for billions of years. Unfortunately, seemed to overlap the supercold regions sonably close to Earth, it is a difficult world Tthe planet’s poles. MESSENGER — short certain areas, and observers seemingly ily mean that it is. Careful observations instruments on NASA’s Mariner 10 space- theorists had calculated. This match pro- to observe in detail. As the closest planet to for MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, backed up these theoretical computations. and analysis are required as proof. Science craft, which made the only previous visits vided a tentative hint of what might be. the Sun, Mercury never strays far from our 30 ASTRONOMY • DECEMBER© 2014 Kalmbach 2013 Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any WWW.ASTRONOMY.COM 31 form without permission from the publisher. www.Astronomy.com A chill at the poles But not all coincidences are bad news. With better observations in following years, sci- entists realized that Mercury’s axis tilts 89.99° to its orbital plane — almost pre- cisely perpendicular. Theory suggests that this near-perfect match of axis and orbit is a long-term effect of the planet’s gravita- tional coupling with the Sun, which would mean that Mercury’s rotation axis adjusts to changes in its orbital inclination over time. As a consequence, deep craters near the planet’s poles can remain in permanent shadow and serve as ice traps for a billion years or more. In 1991, researchers beamed radar sig- nals at Mercury. Using the Goldstone radio telescope in California and the Very Large Array in New Mexico, they detected unusu- This oblique view of the inner world’s north polar region shows the surface temperature averaged over ally strong radar returns from the planet’s two Mercury years. Blue and purple represent the coldest areas, where ice can persist. NASA/UCLA/JHUAPL/CIW polar regions. These areas come into view because Mercury’s orbit tilts 7° to Earth’s, NATIONAL ASTRONOMY AND IONOSPHERE CENTER/ARECIBO OBSERVATORY CENTER/ARECIBO IONOSPHERE AND ASTRONOMY NATIONAL NASA/JHUAPL/CIW which allows astronomers to peek over the Deep craters near Mercury’s north pole harbor water ice. The first evidence for A mosaic of MESSENGER images of Mercury’s north polar region appears Maximum temperature (kelvins) these deposits came from Earth-based radar observations in the early 1990s, beneath radar data of the same area seen at left. All of the large deposits sit inner world’s poles. The giant 1,000-foot 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 which revealed bright patches that reflected most of the incoming signal. on the floors or walls of impact craters, including Kandinsky and Prokofiev. (305 meters) radio dish at Arecibo Obser- vatory in Puerto Rico later observed these same regions with similar results. star’s glare. The best observing conditions an elliptical orbit. (For the same reason, we First, each Mercury day, from one sun- Photographs taken during the three occur when it lies near one of its greatest see slightly more than half of the Moon’s rise to the next, lasts two Mercury years. Mariner 10 flybys in the mid-1970s showed elongations, which create brief periods when surface during a lunar month.) Astrono- Long phases of heating and cooling are the that, in some cases, the high-return regions the planet climbs well above our earthly mers accepted Mercury as another example rule across the planet’s surface. seemed to coincide with deep polar craters. horizon and appears approximately half-lit. of rotational lock well into the 20th century. Second, despite these long cycles, not all Although water ice seemed the most likely It wasn’t until the late 19th and early But further Earth-based observations longitudes experience the same share of cause, theorists developed several even 20th centuries that astronomers, most suggested that Mercury’s “dark side” was heating. Because the planet has a fairly more exotic explanations, including sulfur notably Giovanni Schiaparelli in Italy and far warmer than it should be. Theorists eccentric orbit, it travels much faster when snow, sodium ions, or an unknown feature Greek-born Eugène Antoniadi in France, proposed various ideas to explain the it lies closer to the Sun. of the supercold surface. (After all, this consistently observed the same markings apparent contradiction, including one Noontime heating in one longitudinal was the coldest surface radar scientists on the planet’s illuminated side. These fea- in which the planet possesses a massive zone can be twice that in another 90° had ever explored.) tures did not move over short periods and atmos phere that away. The 3:2 resonance also means The highest temperature observed over two Mercury years gives a better idea of where ice can survive. The reappeared in the same locations at succes- spawns hurricanes that the same regions experience MESSENGER to the rescue coldest spots in permanently shadowed craters only reached –370° Fahrenheit (50 kelvins). NASA/UCLA/JHUAPL/CIW sive greatest elongations. to carry super- extra heating day after day after Into this uncertainty and mystery, NASA These observations implied that Mer- heated air into day. The two hottest launched the MESSENGER probe in 2004. cury likely is tidally locked with the Sun the perma- zones lie along It was a challenge to get a spacecraft to Ice depth (centimeters) and always keeps the same face pointed nently shad- the equator on Mercury with a speed slow enough that the 0 10 20 30 40 50 toward our star. The Moon suffers a similar owed regions. opposite sides of biggest propulsion module possible could fate, in which Earth’s gravity locks the But none of the MESSENGER the planet. Tem- decelerate the craft into a stable orbit. After NASA/JPL-CALTECH Moon so that it rotates in the same period theories seemed peratures there soar as a seven-year voyage that included three it takes to revolve around our planet. The to fit the obser vations. high as 845° Fahrenheit (725 kelvins). flybys of the inner world, the probe arrived observations of Mercury also suggested Then, in 1965, researchers bounced Third, Mercury’s true rotation period in its planned orbit March 17, 2011. that its rotation axis lines up nearly per- powerful radar beams off Mercury. A sub- relative to the stars (58.8 days) coincidentally After a year of observations and anal- pendicular to its orbital plane. tle shift in the wavelengths of the signals turns out to be approximately half of Mer- ysis, NASA announced the results in In Mercury’s case, being tidally locked returned from the planet’s edges didn’t cury’s 116-day synodic period, the time it November 2012. The ice is real, but it isn’t would create a scorchingly hot Sun-facing match an object rotating at the same rate takes the planet to return to the same orbital what scientists expected. If anything, it hemisphere, a perpetually dark and frigid as it revolved around the Sun — Mercury configuration as seen from our planet. proved even more interesting. region on the opposite side, and a fairly spins faster than anyone had suspected. This means that successive observation MESSENGER Principal Investigator broad twilight zone where the Sun would Even so, the planet is tidally locked, just periods from Earth occur when the same Sean Solomon, director of Columbia Uni- rise and set periodically in response to the not in a 1-to-1 ratio. Mercury rotates three side of Mercury faces the Sun. This dynam- versity’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Obser- planet’s varying orbital speed as it follows times on its axis for every two revolutions ical accident is just bad luck for earthbound vatory, described how the science team it makes around the Sun.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Ices on Mercury: Chemistry of Volatiles in Permanently Cold Areas of Mercury’S North Polar Region
    Icarus 281 (2017) 19–31 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Ices on Mercury: Chemistry of volatiles in permanently cold areas of Mercury’s north polar region ∗ M.L. Delitsky a, , D.A. Paige b, M.A. Siegler c, E.R. Harju b,f, D. Schriver b, R.E. Johnson d, P. Travnicek e a California Specialty Engineering, Pasadena, CA b Dept of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA c Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ d Dept of Engineering Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA e Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA f Pasadena City College, Pasadena, CA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Observations by the MESSENGER spacecraft during its flyby and orbital observations of Mercury in 2008– Received 3 January 2016 2015 indicated the presence of cold icy materials hiding in permanently-shadowed craters in Mercury’s Revised 29 July 2016 north polar region. These icy condensed volatiles are thought to be composed of water ice and frozen Accepted 2 August 2016 organics that can persist over long geologic timescales and evolve under the influence of the Mercury Available online 4 August 2016 space environment. Polar ices never see solar photons because at such high latitudes, sunlight cannot Keywords: reach over the crater rims. The craters maintain a permanently cold environment for the ices to persist. Mercury surface ices magnetospheres However, the magnetosphere will supply a beam of ions and electrons that can reach the frozen volatiles radiolysis and induce ice chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Redux
    FEATURE Mercury redux In January 2008, 33 years after Mariner 10 fl ew past the solar system’s innermost planet, MESSENGER crossed Mercury’s magnetosphere. Ancient volcanoes, contractional faults, and a rich soup of exospheric ions give clues to Mercury’s structure and dynamical evolution. Th e Mercury fl yby of the MESSENGER two have not been ruled out, but for those (Mercury surface, space environment, mechanisms shorter-wavelength magnetic geochemistry and ranging) probe was the features would be expected, which were not fi rst of three braking manoeuvres for the observed during the MESSENGER fl yby1. spacecraft , in preparation for its insertion Recent libration observations that require into a polar orbit in 2011. Th e probe a partially molten core11, and the limited achieved the closest approach (201 km) of contraction of Mercury, which implies a Mercury’s surface yet, and took a variety largely molten core, favour a convective of measurements in the magnetosphere, dynamo origin for Mercury’s magnetic fi eld. exosphere and on Mercury’s surface. Some Although Mercury’s magnetosphere of the fi rst results of the MESSENGER looks like a miniature version of Earth’s, mission1–6 reveal Mercury as a planet with Mercury’s relatively weak magnetic richly interconnected dynamics, from fi eld implies that its dynamo must work the dynamo in its molten outer core, a diff erently from that of the Earth. Th e crust and surface with great lobate faults geodynamo, which gives the Earth its and relatively young volcanoes, to a strong magnetic fi eld, is thought to operate magnetosphere that interacts with the core in a magnetostrophic regime in which the dynamo and the interplanetary solar wind.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Planetary Exploration
    **EU5 Chap 2(263-300) 2/20/03 1:16 PM Page 263 Chapter Two NASA and Planetary Exploration by Amy Paige Snyder Prelude to NASA’s Planetary Exploration Program Four and a half billion years ago, a rotating cloud of gaseous and dusty material on the fringes of the Milky Way galaxy flattened into a disk, forming a star from the inner- most matter. Collisions among dust particles orbiting the newly-formed star, which humans call the Sun, formed kilometer-sized bodies called planetesimals which in turn aggregated to form the present-day planets.1 On the third planet from the Sun, several billions of years of evolution gave rise to a species of living beings equipped with the intel- lectual capacity to speculate about the nature of the heavens above them. Long before the era of interplanetary travel using robotic spacecraft, Greeks observing the night skies with their eyes alone noticed that five objects above failed to move with the other pinpoints of light, and thus named them planets, for “wan- derers.”2 For the next six thousand years, humans living in regions of the Mediterranean and Europe strove to make sense of the physical characteristics of the enigmatic planets.3 Building on the work of the Babylonians, Chaldeans, and Hellenistic Greeks who had developed mathematical methods to predict planetary motion, Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria put forth a theory in the second century A.D. that the planets moved in small circles, or epicycles, around a larger circle centered on Earth.4 Only partially explaining the planets’ motions, this theory dominated until Nicolaus Copernicus of present-day Poland became dissatisfied with the inadequacies of epicycle theory in the mid-sixteenth century; a more logical explanation of the observed motions, he found, was to consider the Sun the pivot of planetary orbits.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Impact Basins on Mercury: Global Distribution, Characteristics, and Modification History from MESSENGER Orbital Data Caleb I
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117, E00L08, doi:10.1029/2012JE004154, 2012 Large impact basins on Mercury: Global distribution, characteristics, and modification history from MESSENGER orbital data Caleb I. Fassett,1 James W. Head,2 David M. H. Baker,2 Maria T. Zuber,3 David E. Smith,3,4 Gregory A. Neumann,4 Sean C. Solomon,5,6 Christian Klimczak,5 Robert G. Strom,7 Clark R. Chapman,8 Louise M. Prockter,9 Roger J. Phillips,8 Jürgen Oberst,10 and Frank Preusker10 Received 6 June 2012; revised 31 August 2012; accepted 5 September 2012; published 27 October 2012. [1] The formation of large impact basins (diameter D ≥ 300 km) was an important process in the early geological evolution of Mercury and influenced the planet’s topography, stratigraphy, and crustal structure. We catalog and characterize this basin population on Mercury from global observations by the MESSENGER spacecraft, and we use the new data to evaluate basins suggested on the basis of the Mariner 10 flybys. Forty-six certain or probable impact basins are recognized; a few additional basins that may have been degraded to the point of ambiguity are plausible on the basis of new data but are classified as uncertain. The spatial density of large basins (D ≥ 500 km) on Mercury is lower than that on the Moon. Morphological characteristics of basins on Mercury suggest that on average they are more degraded than lunar basins. These observations are consistent with more efficient modification, degradation, and obliteration of the largest basins on Mercury than on the Moon. This distinction may be a result of differences in the basin formation process (producing fewer rings), relaxation of topography after basin formation (subduing relief), or rates of volcanism (burying basin rings and interiors) during the period of heavy bombardment on Mercury from those on the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • First Look at Mercury
    PLANETARY SCIENCE Mariner 10 was launched to Mercury by way of Venus on November 3, 1973. It was not the first probe to visit Venus. Both the United States and the Soviet Union previously have sent probes to that mysterious, cloud-shrouded planet. However, Mariner 10 was the first to photographically explore the close-up appearance of the planet, and did so both in visibIe and in ultraviolet light. And Mariner 10 was the first probe of any kind to penetrate interplanetary space beyond the orbit of Venus and to achieve a close look at the planet Mercury. First Look Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? There basically are two kinds of reasons. The first is simple and profound and at Mercury difficult to quantify: The very act of exploration is a positive, cultural activity. No one knows what is going to be found. Finding out what Mercury, what Mars, or BRUCE C. MURRAY what the moon is really like, enlarges the consciousness of all the people who partake of that new reality. TV pictures are of special importance because they provide a way both for the scientist to discover features and concepts he could not have imagined and for the public to directly appreciate and participate in the exploration of a new world. Why go to Mercury? Who needs it? But there are more specific scientific objectives as well. For Mercury, the basic-and anomalous-scientific fact is A planetary scientist that it is a very dense planet: It contains a great amount of tells what the voyage mass for its size.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner 10 Observations of Field-Aligned Currents at Mercury
    Planet. Space Sci., Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 133-141, 1997 Pergamon #I? 1997 Published bv Elsevier Science Ltd P&ted in Great Brit& All rights reserved 0032-0633/97 $17.00+0.00 PII: S0032-0633(96)00104-3 Mariner 10 observations of field-aligned currents at Mercury J. A. Slavin,’ J. C. J. Owen,’ J. E. P. Connerney’ and S. P. Christon ‘Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A. ‘Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London, U.K. 3Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. Received 5 October 1995; revised 11 April 1996; accepted 13 April 1996 magnetic field at Mercury with a dipole moment of about 300nT R& (see review by Connerney and Ness (1988)). This magnetic field is sufficient to stand-off the average solar wind at an altitude of about 1 RM as depicted in Fig. 1 (see review by Russell et al. (1988)). For the purposes of comparison the diameter of the Earth is indicated at the bottom of the figure (i.e. 1 RE = 6380 km ; 1 RM = 2439 km). Whether or not the solar wind is ever able to compress and/or erode the dayside magnetosphere to the point where solar wind ions could directly impact the surface remains a topic of considerable controversy (Siscoe and Christopher, 1975 ; Slavin and Holzer, 1979 ; Hood and Schubert, 1979; Suess and Goldstein, 1979; Goldstein et al., 1981). Overall, the basic morphology of this small mag- netosphere appears quite similar to that of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysterious Mercury Bepicolumbo Heads for the World of Ice and Fire
    A Digital Supplement to Astronomy Insights Astronomy Magazine © 2018 Kalmbach Media Mysterious Mercury BepiColumbo Heads for the World of Ice and Fire Dcember 2018 • Astronomy.com Voyage to a world Color explodes from Mercury’s surface in this enhanced-color mosaic taken through several filters. The yellow and orange hues signify relatively young plains likely formed when fluid lavas erupted from volcanoes. Medium- and dark-blue regions are older terrain, while the light-blue and white streaks represent fresh material excavated from relatively recent impacts. ALL IMAGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW 2 ASTRONOMY INSIGHTS • DECEMBER 2018 A world of both fire and ice, Mercury excites and confounds scientists. The BepiColombo probe aims to make sense of this mysterious world. by Ben Evans of extremesWWW.ASTRONOMY.COM 3 Mercury is a land of contrasts. The solar system’s smallest planet boasts the largest core relative to its size. Temperatures at noon can soar as high as 800 degrees Fahrenheit (425 degrees Celsius) — hot enough to melt lead — but dip as low as –290 F (–180 C) before dawn. Mercury resides nearest the Sun, and it has the most eccentric orbit. At its closest, the planet lies only 29 mil- lion miles (46 million kilometers) from the Sun — less than one-third Earth’s distance — but swings out as far as 43 million miles (70 million km). Its rapid movement across our sky earned it a reputation among ancient skywatchers as the fleet-footed messenger of the gods: Italian scientist Giuseppe “Bepi” Colombo helped develop a technique for sending a space Hermes to the Greeks and Mercury to the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Orbit Insertion March 18, 2011 UTC (March 17, 2011 EDT)
    Mercury Orbit Insertion March 18, 2011 UTC (March 17, 2011 EDT) A NASA Discovery Mission Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne C. Brown (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Mission Management, Spacecraft Operations Paulette W. Campbell (240) 228-6792 or (443) 778-6792 [email protected] Carnegie Institution of Washington Principal Investigator Institution Tina McDowell (202) 939-1120 [email protected] Mission Overview Key Spacecraft Characteristics MESSENGER is a scientific investigation . Redundant major systems provide critical backup. of the planet Mercury. Understanding . Passive thermal design utilizing ceramic-cloth Mercury, and the forces that have shaped sunshade requires no high-temperature electronics. it, is fundamental to understanding the . Fixed phased-array antennas replace a deployable terrestrial planets and their evolution. high-gain antenna. The MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space . Custom solar arrays produce power at safe operating ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) temperatures near Mercury. spacecraft will orbit Mercury following three flybys of that planet. The orbital phase will MESSENGER is designed to answer six use the flyby data as an initial guide to broad scientific questions: perform a focused scientific investigation of . Why is Mercury so dense? this enigmatic world. What is the geologic history of Mercury? MESSENGER will investigate key . What is the nature of Mercury’s magnetic field? scientific questions regarding Mercury’s . What is the structure of Mercury’s core? characteristics and environment during . What are the unusual materials at Mercury’s poles? these two complementary mission phases. What volatiles are important at Mercury? Data are provided by an optimized set of miniaturized space instruments and the MESSENGER provides: spacecraft tele commun ications system.
    [Show full text]
  • High Priority Science at Mercury August 14, 2019 Executive Summary
    High Priority Science at Mercury August 14, 2019 Executive Summary In July 2019, in preparation for the next Decadal Survey, NASA Planetary Science Division leadership requested input from the Planetary Science Analysis Groups to help frame the science questions of highest priority to the planetary community. As of August 2019, Mercury remains the only major Solar System body without an Analysis Group. Therefore, an ad hoc group was assembled to engage the Mercury community to ensure that the highest-priority questions for the innermost planet could be identified and communicated to NASA. Via an online survey distributed through email listservs and social media channels, respondents assigned a set of representative Mercury-focused questions a number from 1 (low priority) through 5 (high priority); responders were also able to provide additional feedback for each question and even offer new potential questions. Within one week, the survey had recorded responses from more than 30 individuals beyond the ad hoc committee. The survey indicated that the following Mercury-focused questions are of high priority to the planetary science community: . How did Mercury form? . How did Mercury differentiate and acquire its interior structure? . What is the history of Mercury’s magnetic field and its generation? . How do Mercury’s surface and interior reflect the evolution of the planet? . What is the nature of the complex interactions among Mercury’s external drivers and the planet’s magnetosphere, exosphere, surface, and interior? . What is the origin, history, and inventory of Mercury’s volatiles? Respondents were also asked to consider broader planetary questions that encompass the focus of existing Analysis Groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Basins on Mercury: Evidence of Relaxation?
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 285 (2009) 355–363 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Shallow basins on Mercury: Evidence of relaxation? P. Surdas Mohit a,b,⁎, Catherine L. Johnson a,b, Olivier Barnouin-Jha c, Maria T. Zuber d, Sean C. Solomon e a Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA c The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA d Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA e Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015, USA article info abstract Article history: Stereo-derived topographic models have shown that the impact basins Beethoven and Tolstoj on Mercury are Accepted 15 April 2009 shallow for their size, with depths of 2.5 and 2 (±0.7) km, respectively, while Caloris basin has been Available online 28 May 2009 estimated to be 9 (±3) km deep on the basis of photoclinometric measurements. We evaluate the depths of Editor: T. Spohn Beethoven and Tolstoj in the context of comparable basins on other planets and smaller craters on Mercury, using data from Mariner 10 and the first flyby of the MESSENGER spacecraft. We consider three scenarios that fi Keywords: might explain the anomalous depths of these basins: (1) volcanic in lling, (2) complete crustal excavation, Mercury and (3) viscoelastic relaxation. None of these can be ruled out, but the fill scenario would imply a thick MESSENGER lithosphere early in Mercury's history and the crustal-excavation scenario a pre-impact crustal thickness of Caloris 15–55 km, depending on the density of the crust, in the area of Beethoven and Tolstoj.
    [Show full text]