DOCSLIB.ORG

O Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System SMOOTH PLAINS FORMATION on MERCURY Kiefer, W.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
O Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System SMOOTH PLAINS FORMATION on MERCURY Kiefer, W.S SMOOTH PLAINS FORMATION ON MERCURY Walter S. Kiefer and Bruce C. Murray, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Smooth plains are sparsely cratered regions which cover about 15% of the part of Mercury imaged by Mariner 10. Based primarily on their areal distribution, inferred volume, and stratigraphic relationships with Caloris basin ejecta, a volcanic origin was suggested by the Mariner 10 Imaging Team 12Definitive volcanic features have not been observed, however, leading Wilhelms to suggest that the smooth plains are dominantly ballistically emplaced impact ejecta deposits, analogous to the lunar Cayley Plains (3). This lingering uncertainty prompted us to reexamine Mariner 10 imagery of several smooth plains units in order to better constrain the history and mode of formation of Mercury's smooth plains. Borealis Planitia is a smooth plains unit which completely surrounds the basin Goethe, which is also covered by smooth plains. Borealis Planitia is covered by a number of low ridges, some of which extend to Goethe's rim. These ridges clearly formed after the Goethe impact and apparently once extended onto Goethe's floor. Because these ridges are no longer visible inside Goethe. Goethe's smooth plains must have buried the ridges and therefore must be younger than the ridges. Since the Borealis Planitia smooth plains predate the ridges and the Goethe smooth plains postdate the ridges, at least two separate episodes of smooth plains emplacement must have occurred in this region. The inferred two stage emplacement history, with the later stage restricted to the interior of the Goethe basin, is inconsistent with a ballistic origin but is consistent with a volcanic origin. Evidence also exists for multiple stages of smooth plains emplacement in the Shakespeare and Van Eyck basins. These basins formed prior to the Caloris impact but their smooth plains fill overlies Caloris ejecta and must therefore be younger than Caloris. A low, west facing scarp occurs on Shakespeare's smooth plains and can be traced continuously for almost 100 km. There is no morphological evidence which indicates a tectonic origin for this scarp, so we suggest that it is probably a volcanic flow feature. This indicates that the Shakespeare smooth plains formed as a result of two(or possibly more) volcanic episodes. A similar situation occurs at Van Eyck, where a series of low, west facing scarps may also represent volcanic flows. These scarps only occur in local areas, however, so their interpretation as flow features is less certain than the interpretation of the scarp in Shakespeare. If the volcanic flow interpretation of the Van Eyck scarps is correct, then the Van Eyck smooth plains, like those in Shakespeare, are probably the result of two or more volcanic episodes. Smooth plains also occur inside several craters in the hilly and lineated terrain. Much of the observed dissection of landforms in this area is believed to be due to mass wasting caused by Caloris impact induced seismicity(4), and a portion of the smooth plains in this region may be due to material mass wasted off of crater rims. However, several lines of evidence suggest to us that most of these smooth plains have a volcanic origin. Shadow height measurements of the crater Petrarch's rim indicate that the volume of smooth plains material on Petrarch's floor is too large to have a solely mass wasting origin. Color and albedo contrasts between crater rims and their smooth plains covered floors in this area(5,6) indicate that these smooth plains are probably compositionally different than the surrounding crater rims. This is inconsistent with a mass wasting origin but is consistent with a volcanic origin for the smooth plains. O Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System SMOOTH PLAINS FORMATION ON MERCURY Kiefer, W.S. and Murray, B.C. Based on these observations, we conclude that several discrete episodes of smooth plains formation occurred on Mercury and that at least some smooth plains are volcanic. Watkins has examined cratering statistics for the smooth plains and also concluded that they formed at several different times(7). While we accept Watkins' basic result that the smooth plains are of several different ages, we disagree with several details of his model. Watkins claimed that the Goethe smooth plains are older than the Borealis Planitia smooth plains, whereas we asserted above that the opposite relative age relationship was correct. Because of the small crater counting area in the Goethe basin and the associated large statistical noise level, we believe that our stratigraphically derived relative age relationship is more reliable than Watkins' cratering age. Watkins' data indicates that most smooth plains are post-Caloris in age, but he also reported four areas of smooth plains which he claimed formed prior to the Caloris impact(his SP 1 unit). However, these areas are affected by large numbers of secondary craters and by preexisting craters which were incompletely obliterated by smooth plains formation. Thus, the cratering statistics for these areas are unreliable and it cannot be said with certainty that smooth plains formation occurred on Mercury prior to the Caloris impact. Existing thermal models of Mercury have been constrained primarily by the existence of a magnetic field and by observed limits on planetary volume change(8). The occurrence of multiple volcanic episodes after the Caloris impact provides an important new constraint on thermal models for Mercury. References 1) Strom et al., J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2478-2507. 1975. 2) Murray et al.. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2508-2514, 1975. 3) Wilhelms, Icarus 28. 551-558, 1976. 4) Schultz and Gault, The Moon 12, 159-177, 1975. 5) Hapke et al., Proc. 11th Lun. Plan. Sci. Conf, 817-821, 1980. 6) Dzurisin, Ph.D. Thesis, Part 2, Calif. Inst. Technology, 1977. 7) Watkins, NASA TM 81776, 37-39, 1980. 8) Solomon. Phys. Earth and Planetary Interiors 15, 135-145, 1977. O Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Sarah) Margaret Fuller
    (SARAH) MARGARET FULLER MARCHÉSA D’OSSOLI US’S 1ST FOREIGN WAR CORRESPONDENT [PER EDGAR ALLAN POE, HUMANITY WAS ONCE UPON A TIME DIVIDED INTO “MEN, WOMEN, AND MARGARET FULLER”] AS A COMPARISON PARTITION, CONSIDER “MAN, WOMAN, AND NABISCO” HDT WHAT? INDEX (SARAH) MARGARET FULLER THE MARCHESA D’OSSOLI 1808 The French army occupied Rome, and invaded Spain seizing Barcelona and Madrid. Joseph Bonaparte, who had been King of Naples, became King of Spain, and General Joachim Murat, began to rule in Naples in his stead (he would hold that job until 1815). There were widespread uprisings in Spain, and British troops landed in Portugal. Henry Crabb Robinson, sent by the Times of London to report on the Peninsular War, became the 1st war correspondent (Margaret Fuller, 1st female war correspondent, wasn’t yet born). #1 Male #1 Female HDT WHAT? INDEX (SARAH) MARGARET FULLER THE MARCHESA D’OSSOLI 1810 May 23, Wednesday: Sarah Fuller was born in Cambridgeport, Massachusetts.1 King Solomon II was deposed as the Kingdom of Imeret’i (in Georgia) was annexed by Russia. Friend Stephen Wanton Gould wrote in his journal: 4th day 23 of 5 Mo// The mind again refreshed with the Springs of Life. This eveng in looking forward to Y Meeting while setting at home with my dear H, my feelings were quite raised to a lively sensibility that I seldom have. I rememberd some favord seasons, at that time & as from present apperiences We shall be more at liberty to enjoy the company of our friends than the last. There seem’d something encourageing in the prospect, but how will be cannot tell, sickness or other disappointments may assail us & all our promised enjoyment be frustrated, but be that as it may I hope we shall be favord with the Life of Religion ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 7-24-2018 2:00 PM Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury Jeffrey Daniels The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Neish, Catherine D. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Jeffrey Daniels 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Physical Processes Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Daniels, Jeffrey, "Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5657. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5657 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Impact cratering is an abrupt, spectacular process that occurs on any world with a solid surface. On Earth, these craters are easily eroded or destroyed through endogenic processes. The Moon and Mercury, however, lack a significant atmosphere, meaning craters on these worlds remain intact longer, geologically. In this thesis, remote-sensing techniques were used to investigate impact melt emplacement about Mercury’s fresh, complex craters. For complex lunar craters, impact melt is preferentially ejected from the lowest rim elevation, implying topographic control. On Venus, impact melt is preferentially ejected downrange from the impact site, implying impactor-direction control. Mercury, despite its heavily-cratered surface, trends more like Venus than like the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Redux
    FEATURE Mercury redux In January 2008, 33 years after Mariner 10 fl ew past the solar system’s innermost planet, MESSENGER crossed Mercury’s magnetosphere. Ancient volcanoes, contractional faults, and a rich soup of exospheric ions give clues to Mercury’s structure and dynamical evolution. Th e Mercury fl yby of the MESSENGER two have not been ruled out, but for those (Mercury surface, space environment, mechanisms shorter-wavelength magnetic geochemistry and ranging) probe was the features would be expected, which were not fi rst of three braking manoeuvres for the observed during the MESSENGER fl yby1. spacecraft , in preparation for its insertion Recent libration observations that require into a polar orbit in 2011. Th e probe a partially molten core11, and the limited achieved the closest approach (201 km) of contraction of Mercury, which implies a Mercury’s surface yet, and took a variety largely molten core, favour a convective of measurements in the magnetosphere, dynamo origin for Mercury’s magnetic fi eld. exosphere and on Mercury’s surface. Some Although Mercury’s magnetosphere of the fi rst results of the MESSENGER looks like a miniature version of Earth’s, mission1–6 reveal Mercury as a planet with Mercury’s relatively weak magnetic richly interconnected dynamics, from fi eld implies that its dynamo must work the dynamo in its molten outer core, a diff erently from that of the Earth. Th e crust and surface with great lobate faults geodynamo, which gives the Earth its and relatively young volcanoes, to a strong magnetic fi eld, is thought to operate magnetosphere that interacts with the core in a magnetostrophic regime in which the dynamo and the interplanetary solar wind.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT Day 2007 Program
    Welcome to SUNY Geneseo’s First Annual G.R.E.A.T. Day! Geneseo Recognizing Excellence, Achievement & Talent Day is a college-wide symposium celebrating the creative and scholarly endeavors of our students. In addition to recognizing the achievements of our students, the purpose of G.R.E.A.T. Day is to help foster academic excellence, encourage professional development, and build connections within the community. The G.R.E.A.T. Day Planning Committee: Doug Anderson, School of the Arts Anne Baldwin, Sponsored Research Joan Ballard, Department of Psychology Anne Eisenberg, Department of Sociology Charlie Freeman, Department of Physics & Astronomy Tom Greenfield, Department of English Anthony Gu, School of Business Koomi Kim, School of Education Andrea Klein, Scheduling and Special Events The Planning Committee would like to thank: Stacie Anekstein, Ed Antkoviak, Brian Bennett, Cassie Brown, Michael Caputo, Sue Chichester, Betsy Colon, Laura Cook, Ann Crandall, Joe Dolce, Tammy Farrell, Carlo Filice, Richard Finkelstein, Karie Frisiras, Ginny Geer-Mentry, Becky Glass, Dave Gordon, Corey Ha, John Haley, Doug Harke, Gregg Hartvigsen, Tony Hoppa, Paul Jackson, Ellen Kintz, Nancy Johncox, Enrico Johnson, Ken Kallio, Jo Kirk, Sue Mallaber, Mary McCrank, Nancy Newcomb, Elizabeth Otero, Tracy Paradis, Jennifer Perry, Jewel Reardon, Ed Rivenburgh, Linda Shepard, Bonnie Swoger, Helen Thomas, Pam Thomas, and Taryn Thompson. Thank you to President Christopher Dahl and Provost Katherine Conway-Turner for their support of G.R.E.A.T. Day. Thank you to Lynn Weber for delivering our inaugural keynote address. The G.R.E.A.T. Day name was suggested by Elizabeth Otero, a senior Philosophy major.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Companion to English Literature, 6Th Edition
    e cabal, from the Hebrew word qabbalah, a secret an elderly man. He is said by *Bede to have been an intrigue of a sinister character formed by a small unlearned herdsman who received suddenly, in a body of persons; or a small body of persons engaged in vision, the power of song, and later put into English such an intrigue; in British history applied specially to verse passages translated to him from the Scriptures. the five ministers of Charles II who signed the treaty of The name Caedmon cannot be explained in English, alliance with France for war against Holland in 1672; and has been conjectured to be Celtic (an adaptation of these were Clifford, Arlington, *Buckingham, Ashley the British Catumanus). In 1655 François Dujon (see SHAFTESBURY, first earl of), and Lauderdale, the (Franciscus Junius) published at Amsterdam from initials of whose names thus arranged happened to the unique Bodleian MS Junius II (c.1000) long scrip­ form the word 'cabal' [0£D]. tural poems, which he took to be those of Casdmon. These are * Genesis, * Exodus, *Daniel, and * Christ and Cade, Jack, Rebellion of, a popular revolt by the men of Satan, but they cannot be the work of Caedmon. The Kent in June and July 1450, Yorkist in sympathy, only work which can be attributed to him is the short against the misrule of Henry VI and his council. Its 'Hymn of Creation', quoted by Bede, which survives in intent was more to reform political administration several manuscripts of Bede in various dialects. than to create social upheaval, as the revolt of 1381 had attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward High-Resolution Global Topography of Mercury From
    Planetary and Space Science 142 (2017) 26–37 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Planetary and Space Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pss Toward high-resolution global topography of Mercury from MESSENGER MARK orbital stereo imaging: A prototype model for the H6 (Kuiper) quadrangle ⁎ Frank Preuskera, , Alexander Starkb, Jürgen Obersta,b,c, Klaus-Dieter Matza, Klaus Gwinnera, Thomas Roatscha, Thomas R. Wattersd a German Aerospace Center, Institute of Planetary Research, D-12489 Berlin, Germany b Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, D-10623 Berlin, Germany c Moscow State University for Geodesy and Cartography, RU-105064 Moscow, Russia d Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0315, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We selected approximately 10,500 narrow-angle camera (NAC) and wide-angle camera (WAC) images of Mercury Mercury acquired from orbit by MESSENGER's Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS) with an average resolution MESSENGER of 150 m/pixel to compute a digital terrain model (DTM) for the H6 (Kuiper) quadrangle, which extends from Stereo photogrammetry 22.5°S to 22.5°N and from 288.0°E to 360.0°E. From the images, we identified about 21,100 stereo image Topography combinations consisting of at least three images each. We applied sparse multi-image matching to derive Hun Kal approximately 250,000 tie-points representing 50,000 ground points. We used the tie-points to carry out a DTM photogrammetric block adjustment, which improves the image pointing and the accuracy of the ground point positions in three dimensions from about 850 m to approximately 55 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Torrid Mercury's Icy Poles
    Fire and ice The MESSENGER spacecraft reveals water ice lurking in Torrid Mercury’s icy poles deeply shadowed craters near the innermost planet’s poles. by James Oberg Color explodes from Mercury’s surface in this enhanced-color mosaic. The yellow and orange hues signify relatively young volcanic plains, while blue represents older terrain. The planet’s equator runs horizon- he saga of water ice hiding in GEochemistry, and Ranging — started Planetary scientist David Paige of the works best when good observations are tally through the center of this image; the poles lie at top and bottom. NASA/JHUAPL/CIW the shadows on Mercury ranks orbiting Mercury in March 2011 and has University of California, Los Angeles, a guided by theory.” among the most fascinating been returning reams of data ever since. participating scientist on the MESSENGER During the past several decades, scien- chapters in the history of plan- The discovery of ice contains its own sur- project, stresses the wider significance of tists have come to realize that a conspiracy to the planet nearly 40 years ago, could not Untangling Mercury’s web etary exploration. And the prises and new mysteries. the ice story. “The Mercury discoveries of freak accidents involving Mercury’s make the observations necessary to prove It took centuries for astronomers to deci- story didn’t end a year ago Scientists had suspected for decades that demonstrate the power of theory and motion and orientation had created small the case. Still, radar observations from pher Mercury’s physical and dynamic when scientists using NASA’s water ice might survive in corners of the imagination in astronomy and planetary regions on the planet’s surface where it Earth did detect unusually reflective characteristics and to understand their MESSENGER spacecraft con- solar system’s innermost world.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA and Planetary Exploration
    **EU5 Chap 2(263-300) 2/20/03 1:16 PM Page 263 Chapter Two NASA and Planetary Exploration by Amy Paige Snyder Prelude to NASA’s Planetary Exploration Program Four and a half billion years ago, a rotating cloud of gaseous and dusty material on the fringes of the Milky Way galaxy flattened into a disk, forming a star from the inner- most matter. Collisions among dust particles orbiting the newly-formed star, which humans call the Sun, formed kilometer-sized bodies called planetesimals which in turn aggregated to form the present-day planets.1 On the third planet from the Sun, several billions of years of evolution gave rise to a species of living beings equipped with the intel- lectual capacity to speculate about the nature of the heavens above them. Long before the era of interplanetary travel using robotic spacecraft, Greeks observing the night skies with their eyes alone noticed that five objects above failed to move with the other pinpoints of light, and thus named them planets, for “wan- derers.”2 For the next six thousand years, humans living in regions of the Mediterranean and Europe strove to make sense of the physical characteristics of the enigmatic planets.3 Building on the work of the Babylonians, Chaldeans, and Hellenistic Greeks who had developed mathematical methods to predict planetary motion, Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria put forth a theory in the second century A.D. that the planets moved in small circles, or epicycles, around a larger circle centered on Earth.4 Only partially explaining the planets’ motions, this theory dominated until Nicolaus Copernicus of present-day Poland became dissatisfied with the inadequacies of epicycle theory in the mid-sixteenth century; a more logical explanation of the observed motions, he found, was to consider the Sun the pivot of planetary orbits.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Impact Basins on Mercury: Global Distribution, Characteristics, and Modification History from MESSENGER Orbital Data Caleb I
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117, E00L08, doi:10.1029/2012JE004154, 2012 Large impact basins on Mercury: Global distribution, characteristics, and modification history from MESSENGER orbital data Caleb I. Fassett,1 James W. Head,2 David M. H. Baker,2 Maria T. Zuber,3 David E. Smith,3,4 Gregory A. Neumann,4 Sean C. Solomon,5,6 Christian Klimczak,5 Robert G. Strom,7 Clark R. Chapman,8 Louise M. Prockter,9 Roger J. Phillips,8 Jürgen Oberst,10 and Frank Preusker10 Received 6 June 2012; revised 31 August 2012; accepted 5 September 2012; published 27 October 2012. [1] The formation of large impact basins (diameter D ≥ 300 km) was an important process in the early geological evolution of Mercury and influenced the planet’s topography, stratigraphy, and crustal structure. We catalog and characterize this basin population on Mercury from global observations by the MESSENGER spacecraft, and we use the new data to evaluate basins suggested on the basis of the Mariner 10 flybys. Forty-six certain or probable impact basins are recognized; a few additional basins that may have been degraded to the point of ambiguity are plausible on the basis of new data but are classified as uncertain. The spatial density of large basins (D ≥ 500 km) on Mercury is lower than that on the Moon. Morphological characteristics of basins on Mercury suggest that on average they are more degraded than lunar basins. These observations are consistent with more efficient modification, degradation, and obliteration of the largest basins on Mercury than on the Moon. This distinction may be a result of differences in the basin formation process (producing fewer rings), relaxation of topography after basin formation (subduing relief), or rates of volcanism (burying basin rings and interiors) during the period of heavy bombardment on Mercury from those on the Moon.
    [Show full text]