Thinking About Religion: Scientific Progress and the Cognitive Science of Religion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Thinking about Religion: Scientific Progress and the Cognitive Science of Religion Aaron Colin Thomas Smith Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2012 Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne Produced on archival quality paper Abstract My interest lies with a collection of scholarship labelled the ‘Standard Model’, which I propose constitutes an emerging explanatory framework for theoretical and empirical work on religious cognition. I map the features of the Standard Model and assess the strength of its claims to offer a program for understanding religious cognition. My conclusion dilutes the Standard Model in that I suggest it overstates the mind’s susceptibility to religious content and sidesteps other culturally prolific activities that also engage emotion, memory, belonging and belief. While I acknowledge some convergence pressures upon cultural activities, I argue that these pressures lead towards more generic tendencies such as the ability to hold belief sets, rather than the predisposition to hold religious beliefs. While I do agree that the evidence suggests that religious content will be attractive to human minds, it is neither inevitable, nor possible, without the structure of cultural reinforcement. On this view, religion is not a unique domain, but operates within the more general domain of social agency. I also note that the mind is adept at learning; we can change our minds, discard ideas we acquired in the past, and choose to become or remain an atheist. On the basis of this case study, I argue that an explanatory framework in cognitive science demonstrates progress (towards becoming a research program) when it reveals hitherto unforeseen connections between analytical levels. Boundary-breaking, inter- level connections represent markers of progress. The Standard Model is an overconfident but nevertheless progressive explanatory research framework guiding work on religious cognition because it has revealed previously unforeseen connections between theories and observations derived at different analytical levels. A progressive framework exposes previously unconnected propositions or theories and stimulates new empirical work around them. The Standard Model case illustrates how progress can come about through unforseen connections as well as through predictions. Progressive frameworks make both new and more links. I suggest that a progressive framework encourages the tensions that arise when inter-level connections become messy. Tension leads to sharper empirical questions where progress is served by a framework that stimulates empirical work in trying to find resolutions. In reaching this conclusion, I also recommend a suite of seven analytical 2 criteria for assessing an explanatory framework in cognitive science, building on Thagard (2005a). The Standard Model case suggests that progress in an inter-disciplinary area can be achieved without a unifying or reducing model, and may even be best seen through a complex set of relations that facilitate the development of novel predictions and the specification of inter-level connections. I argue that the lessons in the case of the Standard Model of Religious Cognition underscore the importance of a working framework—a principles-driven, neo-Lakosian ‘soft’ core—in facilitating unforeseen connections between theories and observations arising from different analytical strata. 3 Declaration This is to certify that: (i) the thesis comprises only my original work towards the PhD except where indicated in the Preface, (ii) due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used, (iii) the thesis is fewer than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Aaron Smith May, 2012 4 Acknowledgments I remain indebted to my supervisor, Associate Professor Howard Sankey, for his intellectual rigour, thoughtful guidance, and wry humour. The time Associate Professor Sankey invested into reading and discussing my work has been greatly appreciated. Our conversations have proven some of the most stimulating and enjoyable I have ever experienced. In addition, I am grateful to Dr Neil Thomason for his advice and encouragement. 5 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion ....................................... 12 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 12 Cognitive Science: An Approach to Cognition .......................................................... 20 The Cognitive Science of Religion ............................................................................. 23 The Standard Model of Religious Cognition .............................................................. 27 1. Ordinary, domain-specific cognitive functions support religious representations ................................................................................................................................ 34 2. Intuitive domain inferences are violated with minimally counterintuitive concepts .................................................................................................................. 35 3. Agency detection leads to suppositions about the presence of supernatural agents ................................................................................................................................ 36 4. Intentionality inferences stimulate judgements about the intentions of supernatural agents ................................................................................................. 37 5. Emotion detection assigns emotional states to supernatural agents along with existential implications ........................................................................................... 38 6. Social exchange inclinations reinforce costly commitments to supernatural agents and ritualised performances ........................................................................ 39 7. Innate moral intuitions generate the conception of supernatural agents’ wishes 39 Method and Structure of the Dissertation ................................................................... 42 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 46 Chapter 2. The Analysis of Scientific Progress and the Cognitive Science of Religion 47 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 47 Making Progress in the Standard Model of Religious Cognition ............................... 47 Theories and Research Programs as Units of Analyses ............................................. 56 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 59 Chapter 3. Approaches to Theoretic and Scientific Progress: Paradigms and Unification ........................................................................................................................................ 61 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 61 Progress and Paradigms .............................................................................................. 63 Paradigmatic Incommensurability .............................................................................. 66 Unification and Reduction .......................................................................................... 68 6 Disunity of Science ..................................................................................................... 70 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 72 Chapter 4. Approaches to Theoretic and Scientific Progress: Inter-theoretical Connections .................................................................................................................... 74 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 74 Local Connections: Inter-field Theories as Scientific Progress ................................. 75 Interpretations of Progress .......................................................................................... 81 Inter-theoretic Relations and Progress ........................................................................ 82 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 86 Chapter 5. Representative Power of the Standard Model ............................................... 88 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 88 Establishing the Boundaries ....................................................................................... 90 Explanations for Religious Representations ............................................................... 92 The Composition of Religious Representations ......................................................... 94 What is a Religious Representation? ...................................................................... 94 Minimally Counterintuitive Concepts ...................................................................