What Science? Who's Theology?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Science? Who's Theology? What Science? Who’s Theology? A Reformed Theological Response to Andrew Newberg’s Neurotheological Model By Dubois du Toit Student No: 15184323 Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Theology at the University of Stellenbosch Department of Systematic Theology Promoter: Dr. Dion Forster March 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I, the undersigned, Dubois du Toit, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and it has not been submitted previously in its entirety or in part at any university or college for a degree. Signature: Dubois du Toit Date: March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Religious, mystical and spiritual experiences are some of the most important and complex experiential qualities of human life. It has always been our greatest endeavour to make sense of our reality, and these experiences have permeated our theories, analogies and theologies since the beginning. The rise of the modern scientific enterprise has given us access to previously unattainable perspectives and insights into just how significantly these experiences influence us on a psycho-somatic level. In no other field of study has this investigation seen more prominent development than in the neural sciences. Their studies and findings gave us the opportunity to engage our experiences critically, but researchers started asking questions regarding the experiences’ causal nexus as well – where some even dismissed them as an evolutionary by- product of brain function. In reaction to this position, a new field of study emerged that endeavours to reconcile the scientific study and theology of these experiences, namely, neurotheology. Andrew Newberg, a proponent of neurotheology, is currently spearheading an attempt to establish neurotheology as a autonomous discipline. However, his perspectives on the goals, principles and neurological basis of a neurotheology raise some concern from both the scientific and theological communities. Thus, it will be the task of this study to critically evaluate Newberg’s neurotheology from different interactive perspectives, while focussing on the relevance of its contribution and possible relationship with regards to neuroscience and theology. In order to undertake this task it is necessary to provide a few frameworks which will be able to accommodate neurotheology, neuroscience and theology. An argument will be made for the specific use of a cognitive neuroscientific and critical reformed theological model with respect to the unique thrust of this study. ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Opsomming Godsdienstige, mistieke en spirituele ervaringe is van die belangrikste en mees komplekse ervarings-kwaliteite van die mensdom. Dit was nog altyd ons grootste strewe om sin te maak van ons werklikheid. Hierdie ervaringe het van die begin af ons teoretiese, analogiese en teologiese refleksies deurspek. Met die opkoms van die moderne wetenskap het ons toegang verkry tot voorheen verskuilde perspektiewe en insigte, tot hoe noemenswaardig die psigosomatiese impak van hierdie ervaringe op ons is. In geen ander studieveld het hierdie ondersoek meer prominente vooruitgang getoon as in die neurale wetenskappe nie. Hul studies en bevindings het ons die geleentheid gegee om krities om te gaan met ons ervaringe, maar die navorsers het begin vra na die kousaliteit hierin betrokke – dit het sommige gelei om die ervarings bloot te ontslaan as ’n byproduk van die brein se funksie. In reaksie hiertoe het ’n nuwe veld ontluik wat streef om die wetenskaplike studie en die teologie van hierdie ervaringe te versoen, naamlik, neuroteologie. Andrew Newberg, ’n voorstander van neuroteologie, is tans besig met ’n poging om neuroteologie te bevestig as ’n navorsingsveld uit eie reg. Sy perspektiewe op die doelstellings, beginsels en neurale begronding van neuroteologie het egter kommer gewek vanuit die wetenskaplike en teologiese gemeenskappe. Dit sal dus die taak van hierdie studie wees om Newberg se neuroteologie krities te evalueer vanaf verskeie interaktiewe perspektiewe, terwyl daar gefokus word op die relevansie van sy bydrae en die moontlike verhouding ten opsigte van neurowetenskap en die teologie. Met die blik op hierdie onderneming sal dit nodig wees om ’n aantal raamwerke te voorsien wat in staat sal wees om neuroteologie, neurowetenskap en teologie te akkommodeer. ’n Argument sal gemaak word vir die spesifieke gebruik van ’n kognitiewe neurowetenskaplike en ’n kritiese gereformeerde teologiese model, met betrekking tot die unieke invalshoek van hierdie studie. iii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements I am eternally indebted to every person that spoke a word of comfort or encouragement towards me, during the time I was writing this thesis. I specifically want to thank my wife for all the understanding and support – she has definitely been my greatest cheerleader. I would also like to thank my family – biological and in-laws – and friends, for their continued interest, patience and intercessory praying toward the completion of my studies. A special note of thanks for the guidance, patience, motivation and insights I received from Dr. Dion Forster. He is truly an inspiration, and an unmistakable asset for theological scholarship at Stellenbosch University. Lastly, and most importantly, I submit my everlasting gratitude to my Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ; all I am, and have, and could ever hope to be is by His grace and mercy. iv Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Table of Contents Declaration ........................................................................................................................... i Abstract ................................................................................................................................ ii Opsomming......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents................................................................................................................. v Chapter 1 – General Introduction to the Study ............................................................. 1 1.1. Background and Rationale .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem .................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Research Questions ............................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Contribution and Relevance ............................................................................................... 4 1.5. Research Methodology and Goals ...................................................................................... 4 1.6. Structure of the Study ......................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 – A Description of Andrew Newberg’s Model for Neurotheology ............... 10 2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Newberg’s Research Model Systematized ............................................................. 11 2.1.2. Chapter outline ....................................................................................................... 14 2.2. The Foundational Goals of Newberg’s Neurotheology .................................................... 15 2.3. The Foundational Principles of Newberg’s Neurotheology .............................................. 20 2.3.1. Levelling the playing field ....................................................................................... 21 2.3.2. The Rules of Engagement ....................................................................................... 24 2.4. The Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological underpinnings of Newberg’s Model .. 28 2.5. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 3 – Engaging Neurotheology ......................................................................... 35 3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Science and Neurotheology .............................................................................................. 36 3.2.1. Reductionist view .................................................................................................... 36 3.2.2. Religionist view ....................................................................................................... 39 3.2.3. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 39 3.3. Religion and Neurotheology ............................................................................................. 40 v Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 3.3.1. Apologetic view ....................................................................................................... 40 3.3.2. Integrative view .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Approved by Supervisi G Committee
    Copyright by Jane Katherine Arney 2011 The Thesis Committee for Jane Katherine Arney Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Expecting Epiphany: Performative Ritual and Roman Cultural Space APPROVED BY SUPERVISIG COMMITTEE: Supervisor: John R. Clarke Penelope J. E. Davies Expecting Epiphany: Performative Ritual and Roman Cultural Space by Jane Katherine Arney, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2011 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to Professor Kimberly Davis at Miracosta College, who helped me believe that I could do it. Acknowledgements The idea for this project began in Professor John Clarke’s “Seeing Gods” graduate seminar, in which we explored various aspects of epiphany. Dr. Clarke pointed out that there was fertile ground for this topic in Pompeii and guided me to the Twelve Gods mural. He has also pushed me out of my comfort zone and challenged me to explore areas of theory. I am most grateful for his generosity and his encouragement. I would also like to thank Professor Penelope Davies, whose interest, prodding and comments helped me to better understand and, I hope, improve my writing style. I feel extremely fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with these exemplary scholars whose works are of substantial importance to the field of Roman art history. May 6, 2011 v Abstract Expecting Epiphany: Performative Ritual and Roman Cultural Space Jane Katherine Arney, M.A The University of Texas at Austin, 2011 Supervisor: John R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Studying Neuroscience & Behavior
    A GUIDE TO STUDYING NEUROSCIENCE & BEHAVIOR ABROAD It is no secret that the United States boasts some of the finest behavioral neuroscience programs in the world. Why bother going abroad then? How about exploring a new city, working with peers from around the world, and coming to gain a fuller appreciation of how the principles of biology transcend culture by immersing yourself in an entirely new social environment? Studying neuroscience and behavior abroad will take you far beyond the classroom, encompassing a much broader range of lessons by teaching you daily through living in a different culture. LOCATIONS There are a large amount of universities across the world that boasts respectable medical and scientific research departments. These are all highly prestigious institutions with track records, which boast multiple Nobel laureates and a thick resume of cutting edge scientific achievement. There are Universities all over the world, which offer an intriguing blend of scientific study with enriching cultural immersion. It is important to keep in mind that when studying neuroscience and behavior abroad, especially if only for one semester, that location can often prove more rewarding than the prestige of any academic institution. If you want to study abroad in a developing country in South America or Southeast Asia for example, do not let the lack of internationally acclaimed educational institutions deter you. You will learn much more from daily life in these places than you ever could in a classroom. COURSES & PROGRAMS What neuroscience and behavior courses you take abroad will depend heavily on your area of concentration within the broad field of neuroscience and behavioral research, as well as available courses at your host university or program.
    [Show full text]
  • An Event-Related Brain Potential Study on Syntax and Semantics
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE PSICOLOGÍA TESIS DOCTORAL The influence of facial information on language comprehension: an event-related brain potential study on syntax and semantics La influencia de la información facial en la comprensión del lenguaje: estudio con potenciales cerebrales evento-relacionados sobre sintaxis y semántica MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR David Hernández Gutiérrez Directores Manuel Martín-Loeches Garrido Francisco Muñoz Muñoz Madrid © David Hernández Gutiérrez, 2019 FACULTAD DE PSICOLOGÍA Dept. Psicobiología y Metodología en Ciencias del Comportamiento The influence of facial information on language comprehension: an event-related brain potential study on syntax and semantics La influencia de la información facial en la comprensión del lenguaje: estudio con potenciales cerebrales evento-relacionados sobre sintaxis y semántica Directores: Prof. Dr. Manuel Martín-Loeches Garrido Prof. Dr. Francisco Muñoz Muñoz David Hernández Gutiérrez TESIS DOCTORAL Madrid, 2019 DECLARACIÓN DE AUTORÍA Y ORIGINALIDAD DE LA TESIS PRESENTADA PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE DOCTOR D./Dña.________________________________________________________________, estudiante en el Programa de Doctorado _____________________________________, de la Facultad de _____________________________ de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, como autor/a de la tesis presentada para la obtención del título de Doctor y titulada: y dirigida por: DECLARO QUE: La tesis es una obra original que no infringe los derechos de propiedad intelectual ni los derechos de propiedad industrial u otros, de acuerdo con el ordenamiento jurídico vigente, en particular, la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (R.D. legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de abril, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, modificado por la Ley 2/2019, de 1 de marzo, regularizando, aclarando y armonizando las disposiciones legales vigentes sobre la materia), en particular, las disposiciones referidas al derecho de cita.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism
    www.DISabroad.org Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism Semester: Spring 2017 Copenhagen Credits: 3 Day: Tuesdays Time: 14:50-17:45 Classroom: V10-D14 Major Disciplines: Neuroscience, Psychology, Religious Studies Course Information and Purpose 1. Instructor Information: Maria Serban, PhD PhD in Philosophy (University of East Anglia UK 2014) and MA in Philosophy and Cognitive Science (Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, France 2010). Postdoctoral research at the Center for Philosophy of Science Pittsburgh (2014), at the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE London (2015), and at the University of Copenhagen (2016-2018). Research focuses on explanation in cognitive neuroscience and cognitive psychology, computational modelling in systems biology and neuroscience and the ethical implications of translational medicine. Psychology Program Director: Carla Caetano, Ph.D. DIS Contact: Psychology Program Assistant: Kate Giddens Email: [email protected] Phone: +45 33 76 57 64 2. Course Description Prerequisites: A course in psychology at the university level. The course offers a biological and neuro-cognitive psychological approach to explore and debate what neuroscience, psychology, and related fields reveal about the brain’s role in spiritual experiences, religiosity and atheism. Main topics include in-depth discussions of the nature of the field of neurotheology; health benefits and risks related to being or not being religious; functional neuroanatomy, neurocognition and neurochemistry of 1 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org religious and spiritual experience; neurochemistry correlated with spiritual experiences, mystical states and religiosity across the lifespan with respect to neuro-cognitive factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Mechanisms in Religion and Spirituality: an Integrative Predictive Processing Framework
    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 73 (2017) 359–378 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev Review article Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework a,∗ b Michiel van Elk , André Aleman a Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands b University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience, The Netherlands a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We present the theory of predictive processing as a unifying framework to account for the neurocognitive Received 12 June 2016 basis of religion and spirituality. Our model is substantiated by discussing four different brain mechanisms Received in revised form that play a key role in religion and spirituality: temporal brain areas are associated with religious visions 10 November 2016 and ecstatic experiences; multisensory brain areas and the default mode network are involved in self- Accepted 26 December 2016 transcendent experiences; the Theory of Mind-network is associated with prayer experiences and over Available online 29 December 2016 attribution of intentionality; top-down mechanisms instantiated in the anterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex could be involved in acquiring and maintaining intuitive supernatural beliefs. Keywords: We compare the predictive processing model with two-systems accounts of religion and spirituality, by Religious experiences highlighting the central role of prediction error monitoring. We conclude by presenting novel predictions Supernatural beliefs Prayer for future research and by discussing the philosophical and theological implications of neuroscientific Spiritual experiences research on religion and spirituality.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurotheology: Challenges and Opportunities
    Review article Neurotheology: challenges and opportunities Pierre-Yves Brandta,Fabrice Clémentb,Russell Re Manningc a University of Lausanne, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, Lausanne, Switzerland b University of Neuchâtel, Faculty of Humanities, Neuchâtel, Switzerland c University of Cambridge, Faculty of Divinity,Cambridge, UK Funding /conflict of interest: No funding. No conflict of interest. Summary are. In order of emergence, these synthetic or subdisciplines include neuropsychology, neurophysiology and neurophi- During the last decades of the twentieth century scholars have proposed losophy, to which list has recently been added “neurotheol- “neurotheology” as a new subdiscipline of the neurosciences. This article ogy”. The present article will concern itself with this emer- presents a review and discussion of different interpretations placed on neu- gent discipline, presenting first a review of the different in- rotheology, and attempts to estimate the extent to which neuroscience is a terpretations placed on it, followed by a discussion of these challenge and/or an opportunity for theology and (for the study of) religion. interpretations from the viewpoints of philosophy and the- On the neuroscientific side, neurotheology can be split into a reductionist ology, cognitive science and the psychology of religion and and a religionist neuroscience of religion. On the theological side, it can be religious studies. split into apologetic and integrative approaches. The appraisal of these differ- ent interpretations and of the relevance of neuroscience for the study of re- ligion is conducted from three points of view: philosophy and theology, cog- Neuroscience: achallenge and/or opportunity nitive science, psychology of religion and sciences of religions. for religion and theology Key words: neurotheology; neurosciences; scientific study of religion; philosophy of religion; cognitive sciences; psychology of religion The rise of neuroscience is both a significant challenge and an exciting opportunity for religion and theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis (Complete)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) In brains we trust: How neuroeconomists stylize trust, the brain, and the social world Klaassen, P. Publication date 2014 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Klaassen, P. (2014). In brains we trust: How neuroeconomists stylize trust, the brain, and the social world. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 204069-os-Klaassen.indd 1 11-09-14 13:48 In Brains We Trust How neuroeconomists stylize trust, the brain, and the social world Pim Klaassen ISBN: 978-94-6259-337-4 c Pim Klaassen Printed and bound by Ipskamp drukkers, Amsterdam 2014. Publication of this dissertation was supported by the the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis and the Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • – the Neuroscience of Religious & Spiritual
    FEATURE “NEUROTHEOLOGY” – THE NEUROSCIENCE OF RELIGIOUS & SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES Ian Westmore This article is based on a presentation given by Dr Westmore at the Sanofi In- Focus academic weekend in Somerset West on 8th March 2019. ost psychiatrists would have been trained which people live,” incorporating to work with their patients according to personal growth or transformation, the biopsychosocial model that was first usually in a context separate proposed by George Engel in 1977. This from organized religious Mmodel was an important step in acknowledging the institutions, such as a belief in a fact that in any illness there are in addition to the supernatural (beyond the known biological, also psychosocial determinants. and observable) realm, personal growth, a quest for an ultimate As psychiatrists however, we have come to appreciate or sacred meaning, religious that there is probably another dimension that should experience, or an encounter with Ian Westmore be added to this model – the spiritual. So for many one’s own “inner dimension”.2 nowadays, the model has changed to a “bio-psycho- social-spiritual” model. NEUROTHEOLOGY FEW OF US NOWADAYS WOULD DISPUTE THIS COULD BE SIMPLY DEFINED AS THE FACT THAT THE ABILITY TO EXPERIENCE “THE NEUROSCIENCE OF THEOLOGICAL A SPIRITUAL DIMENSION AND PRACTICE BELIEF”3, BUT OVER THE YEARS THE RELIGION IS A BRAIN FUNCTION. THESE UNDERSTANDING OF NEUROTHEOLOGY ALSO SEEM TO BE EXPERIENCES THAT HAS EVOLVED AND ONE COULD ARE UNIQUELY HUMAN. SO, WE MIGHT NOW SAY THAT, “NEUROTHEOLOGY IS ASK, WHAT IS IT IN, OR ABOUT OUR MULTIDISCIPLINARY IN NATURE AND BRAINS THAT ENABLES US TO EXPERIENCE INCLUDES THE FIELDS OF THEOLOGY, SPIRITUALITY AND PRACTICE RELIGION? RELIGIOUS STUDIES, RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND PRACTICE, PHILOSOPHY, [It needs mentioning that whilst the terms “religion” and “spirituality” are often used interchangeably, COGNITIVE SCIENCE, NEUROSCIENCE, they are not the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Psychiatry in the Age of Neuroscience
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Religion and Psychiatry in the Age of Neuroscience James Phillips, MD,* Fayez El-Gabalawi, MD,† Brian A. Fallon, MD,‡ Salman Majeed, MD,§ Joseph P.Merlino, MD, MPA,|| Jenifer A. Nields, MD,* David Saunders, MD, PhD,¶ and Michael A. Norko, MD, MAR# Abstract: Descartes. Copernican sun-centered astronomy ushered in the begin- In recent decades, an evolving conversation among religion, psychi- ning of conflict with religion because Earth had lost its special status atry, and neuroscience has been taking place, transforming how we conceptualize as the center of the universe. In the 19th century, Darwin's theory of religion and how that conceptualization affects its relation to psychiatry. In this evolution, followed by his book, The Descent of Man, delivered the article, we review several dimensions of the dialogue, beginning with its history most significant challenge to religion, countering the story of creation and the phenomenology of religious experience. We then turn to neuroscientific in Genesis and threatening human uniqueness in the order of nature. studies to see how they explain religious experience, and we follow that with two The 20th and 21st centuries have witnessed the advent of neuroscience, 02/28/2020 on BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVG+tKk+L7/T7CNkNYPmQeYzl/bf33a+3cZUxvdLcgBvl by http://journals.lww.com/jonmd from Downloaded related areas: the benefits of religious beliefs and practices, and the evolutionary including the ability to quantify, measure, and analyze mental processes Downloaded foundation of those benefits. A final section addresses neuroscientific and evolu- such as cognition and emotions in increasingly sophisticated and previ- tionary accounts of the transcendent, that is, what these fields make of the claim ously unforeseen ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neuroscience Account of Religion As a Motivated Process Michael Inzlicht a , Alexa M
    This article was downloaded by: [Mr Richard Sosis] On: 25 February 2012, At: 22:50 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Religion, Brain & Behavior Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrbb20 The need to believe: a neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process Michael Inzlicht a , Alexa M. Tullett a & Marie Good a a Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Available online: 24 Feb 2012 To cite this article: Michael Inzlicht, Alexa M. Tullett & Marie Good (2011): The need to believe: a neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1:3, 192-212 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2011.647849 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Religionum
    HISTORIA RELIGIONUM AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 2 · 2010 PISA · ROMA FABRIZIO SERRA EDITORE MMX Amministrazione ed abbonamenti Fabrizio Serra editore® Casella postale n. 1, succursale n. 8, i 56123 Pisa, tel. +39 050 542332, fax +39 050 574888, [email protected] www.libraweb.net I prezzi ufficiali di abbonamento cartaceo e/o Online sono consultabili presso il sito Internet della casa editrice www.libraweb.net Print and/or Online official subscription rates are available at Publisher’s website www.libraweb.net I pagamenti possono essere effettuati tramite versamento su c.c.p. n. 17154550 o tramite carta di credito (American Express, Visa, Eurocard, Mastercard). * Sono rigorosamente vietati la riproduzione, la traduzione, l’adattamento, anche parziale o per estratti, per qualsiasi uso e con qualsiasi mezzo effettuati, compresi la copia fotostatica, il microfilm, la memorizzazione elettronica, ecc., senza la preventiva autorizzazione scritta della Fabrizio Serra editore®, Pisa · Roma. Ogni abuso sarà perseguito a norma di legge. Proprietà riservata · All rights reserved © Copyright 2010 by Fabrizio Serra editore®, Pisa · Roma. * Direttore responsabile: Fabrizio Serra. Autorizzazione del Tribunale di Pisa n. 36 del 30/10/2007. * issn 2035-5572 issn elettronico 2035-6455 SOMMARIO Religion in the History of European Culture. 9th easr (European Association for the Study of Religions) Annual Conference and iahr (Italian Society for the History of Religions) Special Conference, 14-18 September 2009, University of Messina, Italy Giulia Sfameni Gasparro, Historia Religionum 2011 : easr Conference. Intro- duction 13 Armin W. Geertz, Too much Mind and not enough Brain, Body and Culture. On what needs to be done in the Cognitive Science of Religion 21 Enrico Montanari, Il concetto di ‘fede laica’ in Raffaele Pettazzoni 39 Tim Jensen, The easr within (the world scenario of) the iahr.
    [Show full text]
  • Katja Guenther, MD
    KATJA GUENTHER Department of History 129 Dickinson Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544-1174 [email protected] APPOINTMENT Princeton University, Princeton, NJ Associate Professor, Department of History, Program in the History of Science, 2017- Assistant Professor, Department of History, Program in the History of Science, 2009-2017 Johanna and Alfred Hurley *61 P76 P82 P86 University Preceptor in History, 2012-15 Associate Faculty Member, Department of German, 2014- EDUCATION Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Ph.D. in the History of Science, 2009 Cologne University, Cologne, Germany M.D. (Medical Doctor), 2003 Oxford University, Oxford, UK M.Sc. (Master of Science) in Neuroscience, 2000 PUBLICATIONS Books: Localization and Its Discontents – A Genealogy of Psychoanalysis and the Neuro Disciplines (University of Chicago Press, December 2015). Reviewed in American Historical Review, Modern Intellectual History, Isis, Psychoanalysis and History, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Medical History, British Journal of the History of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Times Higher Education, The British Society for Literature and Science. Shortlisted for the John Pickstone Prize for the best scholarly book in the History of Science (BSHS), 2014-15 The Mirror and the Mind: A History of Self-Recognition in the Sciences of Mind and Brain, book manuscript in preparation. Special issue: “Soul Catchers: A Material History of the Mind Sciences,” co-edited with Volker Hess, Special Issue Medical History 60.3 (2016). Articles and essays in academic journals and edited volumes: “Psychoanalysis,” chapter in The Cambridge History of Modern European Thought, ed. Peter Gordon & Warren Breckman (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming, 2018).
    [Show full text]