www.DISabroad.org

Neuroscience of and Semester: Spring 2017 Copenhagen Credits: 3 Day: Tuesdays : 14:50-17:45 Classroom: V10-D14 Major Disciplines: , Psychology,

Course Information and Purpose 1. Instructor Information:

Maria Serban, PhD PhD in Philosophy (University of East Anglia UK 2014) and MA in Philosophy and Cognitive (Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, France 2010). Postdoctoral research at the Center for Pittsburgh (2014), at the Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE London (2015), and at the University of Copenhagen (2016-2018). Research focuses on explanation in and cognitive psychology, computational modelling in systems biology and neuroscience and the ethical implications of translational medicine.

Psychology Program Director: Carla Caetano, Ph.D.

DIS Contact: Psychology Program Assistant: Kate Giddens Email: [email protected] Phone: +45 33 76 57 64

2. Course Description Prerequisites: A course in psychology at the university level.

The course offers a biological and neuro-cognitive psychological approach to explore and debate what neuroscience, psychology, and related fields reveal about the brain’s role in spiritual experiences, religiosity and atheism. Main topics include in-depth discussions of the nature of the field of neurotheology; health benefits and risks related to being or not being religious; functional , neurocognition and of

1 and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org religious and spiritual experience; neurochemistry correlated with spiritual experiences, mystical states and religiosity across the lifespan with respect to neuro-cognitive factors.

3. Objectives Students in this class will: By the end of this course you will gain insight into the complexity of researching religion, , and atheism from a neuroscientific perspective. You will be informed about some of the most relevant debates and research directions currently being pursued pertaining to the exploration of the “religious” brain. We explore evolutionary arguments for and against religion, we discuss studies that explore religion and spirituality in the brain and the “where”, “how” and “what” of neurotheology. You will also gain some understanding into atheism – for example, why are some people atheist and what factors influence whether someone might become spiritual or not? You will also have the opportunity to think of an exciting research question, to explore this topic in depth and to come up with your own experimental paradigm.

Course Components 1. Required Texts Canvas: ● Peer-reviewed articles and other readings for each class can be found on Canvas. See syllabus and individual class dates for references.

2. Approach to Teaching The most important component of this course is student participation and discussion. It is thought, that the students should guide the learning directions that this course takes and the facilitator will moderate and provoke thought and discussion. There will be numerous in-class exercises designed to engage students in their own learning experience. Lecture format will be used in order to highlight very important concepts related to the readings and to give extra guidance for discussion and assignment purposes. We will have many engaging articles to read and whenever possible, selected videos will be used as well.

3. Field Studies ● Date/Time: Wednesday, March 29th 13.00-17.00 Location: The National Gallery of Denmark Topic: Sacred art in a secular context ● Date/Time: Wednesday, May 3rd 8.30-12.30 Location: Brahma Kumaris, Vodroffsvej 9b, 1900 Frederiksberg C Topic: A spiritual exploration. Discussion of the relation between mind, intellect and the subconscious and the opportunity to experience focused meditation

4. Guest Lectures 1. Uffe Schødt, Associate Professor in School of Culture and Society - Department of the Study of Religion Date: March 7th Topic: Ways of looking at the religious brain 2. Kamilla Lange, Clinical Psychologist and Mindfulness Instructor 2 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Date: May 11th Topic: Meditation, spirituality and neuroscience

5. Expectations of the Students This course emphasizes collaborative learning. This involves in-class group activities and frequent discussion among peers punctuated by mini-lectures from the instructors for context and direction. The goal of learning collaboratively is to develop skills for how to extend the knowledge acquired during class. You should come to class with (electronic or hardcopy) access to the assigned reading and you should expect to use and refer to the reading during class time. Students will keep a journal throughout the course where they respond to questions related to the readings. All students are expected to contribute their thoughts every day. Participation in class discussions is integral to a rich learning experience and an enjoyable class. You will be graded on the quality of your participation and the depth of your comments and insight as well as the thoughtfulness of your questions. If differences of opinion arise then students are expected to debate openly, but respectfully. Equal contributions of all group members to any group work is expected.

6. Class Representatives Each semester DIS looks for class representatives to become an official spokesperson for their class group, addressing any concerns that may arise (in academic or related matters), suggesting improvements and coming up with new ideas. Class representatives are a great way for DIS faculty to ensure better and timelier feedback on their courses, assessments and teaching styles, and as such perform an invaluable role in connecting student needs with faculty instruction during term time. Class Representatives will be elected in class at the beginning of the semester.

Assignments and Evaluation

Assignment How evaluated Due Date Percentage of grade Participation and Attendance Individual Ongoing 10%

Journal Entries Individual Ongoing 15% Classroom Activities Group Ongoing 10% Methods Class: Poster Group February 21st 15% Presentation Field Study Assignment Individual April 12th 10% (Museum or Panel Debate) Debate Class Individual or May 2nd 20% group Final Exam Individual TBA 20% Total 100%

3 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Participation & Attendance: 10% The heart of this class is driven by student participation. The primary character of the class will be exploration of ideas, idea generation, inquiry and discussion. Students must bring to class an inquisitive mind, a willingness to share their thoughts, ideas and questions. Grades will be deducted when readings have not been completed and when participatory efforts are lacking. Please see participation rubric on canvas for specifics. Unexcused and frequent absenteeism will result in a loss of grade. Using laptops and cellphones in class for anything but class work will also result in loss of grade.

Journal Entries: 15% In order to ensure that readings have been done, to stimulate discussion and to clarify open questions, students are expected to respond to directed questions related to the readings for 8 classes during the semester. Journal entries are submitted on canvas and are to be around 500 words. The answer format should be short arguments. Students should make clear how your position relates to the readings and what reasons support the point(s) they are defending. Students are advised to choose one of the questions that can be found in the syllabus below and on canvas. The “first day” journal entry is 1% of your final grade, and all other journal entries are worth 2%. Effort, insight, reflection and referring to outside sources as well as the reading itself will be taken into consideration for the grade.

Sample of classroom learning activities: 10% ● Puzzle: each group explains or illustrates a different idea and then the results are discussed and compared in the wider group ● Group Grid: each group extracts ideas from different parts of the lecture and then class shares findings to complete grid ● Think-Pair-Share: individuals work in small groups of specific tasks and then they communicate results, difficulties or questions to the class to improve their answers ● Interview: pairs interview each other for response to specific questions or to summarize responses ● Conceptual maps: students work in small groups to design creative conceptual maps that illustrate their understanding of the ideas presented in class or introduced in the assigned readings, incorporating also their own questions about the links between the notions introduced, the conclusions of the arguments, etc. The maps will be discussed with the rest of the class.

Methods Class: 15% Due: February 21st (9 am) For this class we will simulate a poster session at a conference. The conference is on methods used in the study of neuroscience of religion and atheism. Small groups will present to their peers on their assigned empirical method and its uses. We encourage the presenters to rely also on the material (papers and course material) presented during the class. Preparation will include group work outside of class to develop the poster as well as guidance from the lecturers. During the poster session, the other "research teams" will pose questions about the merits and methodological problems of their method and how it can be used to study our topic best. Both the presentation and the questioning skills will be taken into consideration for the assessment of this task. Please refer to the assignment description and grading rubric for further information (on canvas). 4 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Field Study Assignments: 10% The students can choose to do one of the following essay assignments (both due at the same date)

1. Museum Essay Due: April 12th Art is created, at least in part, to trigger a response in the perceiver. This subjective response is often a complex emotional one. Religion has been an inspiration for many artists throughout time and into the present day. Works of art have also been used as instruments of spiritual attunement; however secular experiences of sacred art involve different modes of appreciation from the spiritual: technical, historical, and aesthetic. At the National Museum, we ask you to reflect on: 1) How aesthetic experiences evoked by art might influence and shape religious beliefs and emotions? 2) Are the emotions triggered by paintings of sacred art different from the emotions triggered by other paintings?, 3) How can one, in the absence of , find sacred art relevant or gripping? 4) Does the context in which sacred art is displayed (museums, galleries) disrupt their function as tools for meditation? and 5) What do these considerations imply for the study of the neurobiological study of religious emotions? For your paper, chose two paintings (one painting with a religious or spiritual theme, the other without) you have viewed in the National Museum (be sure to take a photograph of each and reference it in your paper). Using one of the suggested questions, write a 2-4 page paper about how visual representations influence the transmission of religious ideas and beliefs within a religious and a secular context. You are encouraged to use 1-3 peer-reviewed references to back up your views. For more details see the Assignment page on Canvas under the relevant heading.

2. Panel Debate Paper Due: April 12th The humanities and the natural offer very different perspectives on religious phenomena. The panel debate examines whether these views are complementary or in tension with each other. The panel debate will include presentations from DIS and external scholars illustrating different ways in which religion is approached in different disciplines as an object of investigation. What aspects of religious phenomena can be studied within a broad cognitive scientific perspective? How can historical and anthropological studies be integrated with a broadly biological perspective on human beings? Is religion unique to the human species? What are the psychological capacities involved in ? Use the panel debate as a launchpad to explore the answer to one of these questions. You are encouraged to ask questions during the panel debate but also to use additional references in structuring your essay. Your paper should be no longer than 4 pages and be clearly related to one of the questions discussed in the panel. For more details see the Assignment page on Canvas under the relevant heading.

Debate Class: 20% Due: May 2nd The lecturers will present the rules of a debate session and will provide a list of topics that the debate teams can choose from. There will also be a “practice” debate during which students will be given feedback both on their arguments and debate style but also on procedural rules. This session will be organized before the session that will be graded. (For more information see “Assignments” on Canvas.) 5 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Final Exam: 20% Date: Tuesday May 9th Time: 9:00 - 11:00 There will be a final exam based on the readings and class discussion. It will be a combination of short and long answer questions. There will be a review and more information as the semester progresses.

To be eligible for a passing grade in this class you must complete all of the assigned work.

Policies Attendance: You are expected to attend all DIS classes when scheduled. If you miss a class for any reason, please contact the faculty no later than the day of the missed class. If you miss multiple classes the Director of Teaching and Learning, and the Director of Student Affairs will be notified and they will follow-up with you to make sure that all is well. Absences will jeopardize your grade and your standing at DIS. Allowances will be made in cases of illness, but in the case of multiple absences you will need to provide a doctor’s note.

Academic Honesty, Plagiarism, and Violating the Rules of an Assignment: DIS expects that students abide by the highest standards of intellectual honesty in all academic work. DIS assumes that all students do their own work and credit all work or thought taken from others. Academic dishonesty will result in a final course grade of “F” and can result in dismissal. The students’ home universities will be notified. DIS reserves the right to request that written student assignments be turned in electronic form for submission to plagiarism detection software. See the Academic Handbook for more information, or ask your instructor if you have questions.

Policy on Late Papers: Late papers will not be accepted.

Policy for Students Who Arrive Late to Class: Life happens and we are all late now and then. If a student is consistently late or disruptive when arriving to class then this will affect their participation grade.

Use of Laptops or Phones in Class: Computers and iPhones are allowed in class PURELY for note taking purposes. In case of other uses such as Facebook, emails or internet surfing, it will have a negative impact on your participation grade. Cell phones are to be shut off during class and texting/SMS'ing etc. during class will have a negative impact on your participation grade.

Disability and Resource Statement: Any student who has a need for accommodation based on the impact of a disability should contact the Office of Academic Support ([email protected]) to coordinate this. In order to receive accommodations, students should inform the instructor of approved DIS accommodations within the first two weeks of classes.

6 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Course Schedule Tuesday, Setting the Stage: Scandinavia, definitions and the meaning of religion for the January 24 brain. Welcome! Class 1-2 Today’s class: ● Using Canvas with this course ● Present the cognitive science of religion as a multidisciplinary empirical field and discuss the relationship between neuroscientific studies, cognitive, evolutionary and developmental studies of religion. ● Introduce the course themes ● Answer questions about assignments and expectations ● Explore the cultural differences between Scandinavia and the US concerning the spread and attitude towards religion

Required readings: ● Zuckerman, P. 2009. Why are Danes and Swedes so irreligious? Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 22(I) : 55-69. ● Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2007. Atheists. A psychological profile. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, pp. 300-317.

Recommended readings: ● Smart, J. J. C., Atheism and Agnosticism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = ● Gould, S. J. Nonoverlapping Magisteria

Questions discussed in class: ● Can we define religion and spirituality? ● Is there such a thing as religion? ● How to understand atheism cross-culturally? Is atheism non-religious?

Journal Entry “First Day”:

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca 300 up to 500 words long:

7 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

● Why is it important to study the psychology of religious behaviour and ? How does the psychological study of religion differ from religious studies? ● What is the object of a psychological study of religion? Does it differ from the object of a neuroscientific study? ● What are the main hypotheses used for explaining the differences in religiosity between different countries? Which argument do you find to be the strongest? Why? ● What is the difference between atheism and agnosticism? Can you give concrete examples to illustrate this difference?

Tuesday, Evolutionary theories of religion January 31 Class 3-4 Today’s class ● Introduce the key concepts in evolutionary psychology ● Understand the structure of evolutionary arguments in psychology ● Discuss why the theory of is relevant for the scientific study of religion ● Present adaptive and by-product theories of the evolution of religion and discuss the difference between them

Required readings ● Sosis. R. 2009. The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Culture and Cognition 9: 315-322.

Recommended readings ● Downes, Stephen M., Evolutionary Psychology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . ● Day, M. 2008. Godless savages and superstitious dogs: Charles Darwin, imperial ethnography, and the problem of human uniqueness. Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (1): 49-70.

Questions discussed in class ● What is evolutionary theory? ● Why is evolutionary theory relevant for the study of the psychological and neurobiological underpinnings of religion? ● How do adaptationist theories of religion differ from by-product theories of religion?

Journal entry: “Evolutionary Origins of Religion”

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

8 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

● Identify two points on which adaptationist and by-product theories of religion differ. Why are these differences important for the scientific study of religion? ● Do other animals exhibit forms of religious organization and behaviour? Give examples to support your point. ● Are there characteristic (distinctive) features of religion? Give examples of beliefs, emotions, practices that make religion a special human characteristic.

Core Course Week February 6 - 11 No Class Tuesday, Functional neuroanatomy of religious belief and disbelief February 14 Today’s class ● Determine a general understanding of the functional neuroanatomy of the brain Class 5-6 ● Discuss hypotheses about brain function that would be involved in religious and spiritual experience and locate these areas in the brain.

Required readings: ● Semrud-Clikeman, M. et al. (2009). Child . Assessment and Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Functional Neuroanatomy. Chapter 2. (focus on pages 35 – 44). Springer US ● Schjoedt, U. et al. (2009). Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal . Social Cognitive and , 4(2), 199-207.

Recommended readings: ● Examples of tools for investigating the functional neuroanatomy of the brain: ○ http://fn.med.utoronto.ca/index.html, ○ http://www.atlasbrain.com/enx/atlas_main.html ○ https://quizlet.com/13885870/neuropsychology-flashcards-flash-cards/

Questions discussed in class: ● How do we map the brain? ● How can functional neuroanatomy help us explain psychological capacities and behavior? ● Is there a specialized functional module for religion or is the whole brain involved?

Journal Entry: ● No journal entry for today

9 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Long Tour 1/ Break February 25-March 5 No Class

Tuesday, Methods for the study of religious belief and disbelief February 21 Today’s class: Class 7-8 ● You will present a group poster on a particular neuroscientific method. There will be short presentations of your posters as in the context of a conference where you have to present your results and those of your team. Note: The lecturers will provide timely guidance for your choice of poster topic and questions. ● The “conference” will be followed by a discussion of the main types of methods used in the cognitive neuroscience of religion, their advantages, and limitations. ● Guidelines for understanding the Methods and Discussion sections of scientific papers.

Assignment for class: ● Prior to class you will decide in small groups on which cognitive neuroscientific method your group would like to work and you will ask for advice about resources and applicability of methods in the study of religious cognition and behaviour. More info on canvas.

Journal Entry: ● No journal entry for today

10 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday Bridging the Gap: From the Cognitive Science to the Neuroscience of Religion March 7 Today’s class: Classes 9-10 ● Explain the cognitive advantages that make religion appealing ● Compare cognitive and neuroscientific methods for studying religion Guest Lecture: ● Discuss the differences between studying religious , beliefs, and emotions Uffe Schødt Required readings: ● Schjoedt, Uffe (2009). The religious brain: A general introduction to the experimental neuroscience of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 21: 310–339. ● McCauley, R. & Cohen, E. 2010. Cognitive science and the naturalness of religion. Philosophy Compass 5 (9): 779-792.

Recommended readings: ● Block, N. (2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 481-498.

Questions discussed in class: ● What does integration mean in the context of the cognitive science of religion? ● What are the main experimental methods used to investigate the religious brain? ● Why the psychology and neuroscience of religion need each other?

Journal entry:

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● What are the possible explanations of the cross-cultural recurrence and historical persistence of religion? ● What altered states of consciousness are relevant for the study of religion? ● What is the key idea behind the “ Helmet”? ● How do cognitive scientists distinguish the cognitive and emotional elements of ? Are there different methodological challenges in studying each of these elements?

11 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, Developmental Approaches to Religion March 14 Today’s class Classes 11-12 ● Discuss the differences between beliefs in agents and religious beliefs and identify whether empirical studies privilege investigation of a particular class of beliefs

● Explain the links between the theory of mind hypothesis and studies of religious cognition in children ● Assess the evidence for the hypothesis that there are developmental stages in the acquisition of religious cognition

Required readings: ● Lane, J.D. et al. (2015). Approaching an understanding of omniscience from the preschool years to early adulthood. Developmental Psychology DOI: 10.1037/a0037715

Recommended readings: ● Bloom, Paul (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental science 10: 147–151 ● Koenig, L. et al. (2008). Stability and change in religiousness during emerging adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 532-543.

Questions discussed in class: ● How do developmental psychologists investigate religious behaviour and belief? ● Are there specific developmental stages in religious cognition? ● How is the development of theory of mind studied in young children? What is its link to religious development? ● Which neuroscientific methods could be applied to study the development of religion?

Journal entry: “Developmental approaches” In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● What is the difference between the Anthropomorphic and the Preparedness Hypotheses discussed in the Lane et al. 2015 study? ● Explain in your own words the difference between the reality bias and theory of mind. Which experiments are used to investigate these psychological capacities? ● Does the study support the idea that children are “intuitive theists”? Long Tour 2 Break March 18-March 26 No Class

12 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, The mystical brain March 28 Today’s class:

Classes 13-14 ● Discuss how mystical experiences are measured in neuropsychological studies ● Compare two studies of mystical experiences ● Understand the link between religion and mystical experience

Required readings: ● Beauregard, M. & Paquette, V. 2006. Neural correlates of mystical experiences in Carmelite nuns. Neuroscience Letters, 405, pgs 186-190 ● Cristofori et al. 2015. Neural correlates of mystical experience. Neuropsychologia. 80: 212- 220. Recommended Readings: ● Hill, J. (2014). Finding God in a seizure: the link between epilepsy and . ● Blanke O. and Castillo V. (2007). Clinical in epileptic patients with autoscopic hallucinations and out-of-body experiences. Epileptologie, 24, 90-95

Questions discussed in class: ● Can empirical studies identify a neurobiological marker for the mystical experience? ● What are the main methodological limitations and challenges of studying the neural basis of mystical experience? ● What are the neural networks thought to be involved in mystical experiences?

Journal Entry: “Mystical Brain”

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● What is the Frontal Inhibition Hypothesis? ● How does inform the neurobiological study of mystical experience? ● What are the main features of mystical experience and how are they measured in neuropsychological studies?

Field Study Wednesday, March 29 13:00-17:00 Location: National Gallery of Denmark Topic: Sacred art in a secular context Objective: Explore the role of visual representations within and outside religious contexts 13 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, Religion and Psychedelic Therapy April 4 Today’s class Class 15-16 ● Analyze the contributions that can make to our understanding of the neural basis of religious cognition ● Understand the neural basis for the therapeutic effect of psychedelic treatments ● Discuss the link between psychedelic experiences and mystical experiences

Required readings: ● Griffiths, R. R. et al. 2008. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22(6), 621-632.

Recommended readings: ● Liechti et al. 2016. Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology. DOI 10.1007/s00213-016- 4453-0

Questions discussed in class: ● What is the relationship between psilocybin and serotonin? ● What do we know about neural activity under hallucinogens? ● How is mystical experience related to psychedelic induced experience and to the treatment of depression?

Journal Entry: “Religion and Psychedelics”

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● What are the main sensory and emotional effects of psychedelic drugs? What do we know about the neural mechanisms underpinning these effects? ● Are there any relevant differences between psilocybin induced experiences and LSD induced experience? What is their link to mystical experience? ● What are the main challenges facing psychedelic assisted treatments of mental disorders? What seem to be their benefits or advantages?

Panel discussion: Cognitive Science meets Religious Studies Evening Event April 5 17.30-19.00 Topic: Humanistic and scientific perspectives on religion -- Complementary or clashing? Objective: Debate different views on the relations between science and religion 14 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, Meditation, Mindfulness and Spirituality April 11 Today’s class ● Discuss different types of meditation practices Class 17-18 ● Explore the link between meditation and religious experience ● Identify different types of non-religious spirituality that are involved in meditation practices

Guest Lecturer Required readings Kamilla Lange ● Esch, T. 2013. The neurobiology of meditation and mindfulness. Meditation: Neuroscientific Approaches and Philosophical Implications. 153-173. Springer.

Recommended readings: ● Rubia, K. 2009. The neurobiology of meditation and its clinical effectiveness in psychiatric disorders. Biological Philosophy 82 (1): 1-11. ● Zeidan, et al. 2012. Mindfulness meditation-related relief: evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain. Neuroscienc Letters 520 (2): 165-173.

Questions discussed in class: ● What are the psychological functions of meditation practices in religion? ● Can meditation practices be non-religious? ● Are there specific neural signatures of meditation practices? ● What are the therapeutic benefits of meditation? How do they differ across types of meditation practices?

Journal Entry: “Meditation”

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● When and how meditation intervene with religious experience and well-being? ● Are there types of non-religious spirituality one can identify with meditation practices? How can one pin down the distinction? ● How have the specific neural signatures of meditation practices being investigated so far? ● What are the main challenges facing the methods used to study the neurobiology of meditation? Travel Break April 12 – April 17 No Class

15 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, Spirituality and Atheism: Can we live without belief? April 18 Today’s Class Class 19-20 ● Discuss the meaning of “atheism” across different cultures ● Analyze the link between atheism and specific features of religious behaviour and experience ● Present data about the psychological, social and political implications of atheism ● Discuss how different types of atheism are accounted by the evolutionary and neurocognitive theories discussed in the course

Required readings: ● Singer, P. & M. Hauser 2016. Godless morality. In Ethics in the Real World. Princeton University Press. ● Norenzayan, A. & Gervais, W.M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 20-25.

Recommended readings:

● Massimo Pigliucci (2013). New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):142-153. ● McCauley, R. N. (2013). Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Or Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying about Reductionism, Mental Culture: Towards a Cognitive Science of Religion. D. Xyglatas and W. W. McCorkle, Jr. (eds.). London: Equinox.

Questions discussed in class: ● Can atheism satisfy the main social and psychological functions of religion? ● What is the relationship between morality and religion? ● Are evolutionary debunking argument fallacious?

Journal entry: “Atheism”

In light of your readings, discuss one of the following question topics. Your answer should be cca. 300 up to 500 words long:

● How does the acquisition of atheist beliefs differs from the acquisition of religious beliefs? Elaborate your answer in light of the cognitive theories discussed in class. ● What are the main arguments for a “godless morality”? ● What are the main psychological functions of religion? How do they differ from those of atheism? ● Does science (and in particular the cognitive neuroscience of religion) imply a reductivist view of human nature? 16 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

Tuesday, Summary and Review of the semester April 25 Review for Final Exam Preparation for Debate Class Class 21-22

Journal Entry: no journal entry for today

Tuesday, May 2 Debate Class Topic: How neuroscience can participate in debates about atheism? Class 23

Journal entry: no journal entry for today Final Exam Week May 8-11 No Class

Final Exam Time: Tuesday, May 9th 9.00-11.00 Location: V10-D14

References:

A. Required Readings:

1. Beauregard, M. & Paquette, V. 2006. Neural correlates of mystical experiences in Carmelite nuns. Neuroscience Letters, 405, pgs 186-190. 2. Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2007. Atheists. A psychological profile. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, pp. 300-317. 3. Cristofori et al. 2015. Neural correlates of mystical experience. Neuropsychologia. 80: 212- 220. 4. Esch, T. 2013. The neurobiology of meditation and mindfulness. Meditation: Neuroscientific Approaches and Philosophical Implications. 153-173. Springer. 5. Griffiths, R. R. et al. 2008. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22(6), 621-632. 6. Lane, J.D. et al. (2015). Approaching an understanding of omniscience from the preschool years to early adulthood. Developmental Psychology DOI: 10.1037/a0037715 7. McCauley, R. & Cohen, E. 2010. Cognitive science and the naturalness of religion. Philosophy Compass 5 (9): 779-792. 8. Norenzayan, A. & Gervais, W.M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 20-25. 17 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology www.DISabroad.org

9. Schjoedt, U. et al. (2009). Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 199-207. 10. Schjoedt, Uffe (2009). The religious brain: A general introduction to the experimental neuroscience of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 21: 310–339. 11. Semrud-Clikeman, M. et al. (2009). Child Neuropsychology. Assessment and Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Functional Neuroanatomy. Chapter 2. (focus on pages 35 – 44). Springer US. 12. Singer, P. & M. Hauser 2016. Godless morality. In Ethics in the Real World. Princeton University Press. 13. Sosis. R. 2009. The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Culture and Cognition 9: 315-322. 14. Zuckerman, P. 2009. Why are Danes and Swedes so irreligious? Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 22(I) : 55-69.

B. Recommended Readings:

1. Blanke O. and Castillo V. (2007). Clinical neuroimaging in epileptic patients with autoscopic hallucinations and out-of-body experiences. Epileptologie, 24, 90-95 2. Block, N. (2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 481-498. 3. Bloom, Paul (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental science 10: 147–151 4. Day, M. 2008. Godless savages and superstitious dogs: Charles Darwin, imperial ethnography, and the problem of human uniqueness. Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (1): 49-70. 5. Downes, Stephen M., Evolutionary Psychology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . 6. Gould, S. J. Nonoverlapping Magisteria 7. Hill, J. (2014). Finding God in a seizure: the link between temporal lobe epilepsy and mysticism. 8. Koenig, L. et al. (2008). Stability and change in religiousness during emerging adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 532-543. 9. Liechti et al. 2016. Alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences after acute LSD in humans. Psychopharmacology. DOI 10.1007/s00213-016-4453-0 10. Massimo Pigliucci (2013). New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):142-153. 11. McCauley, R. N. (2013). Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Or Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying about Reductionism, Mental Culture: Towards a Cognitive Science of Religion. D. Xyglatas and W. W. McCorkle, Jr. (eds.). London: Equinox. 12. Rubia, K. 2009. The neurobiology of meditation and its clinical effectiveness in psychiatric disorders. Biological Philosophy 82 (1): 1-11. 13. Smart, J. J. C., Atheism and Agnosticism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = 14. Zeidan, et al. 2012. Mindfulness meditation-related pain relief: evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain. Neuroscienc Letters 520 (2): 165-173.

18 Neuroscience of Religion and Atheism l DIS – Study Abroad in Scandinavia Related Majors: Religion, Neuroscience, Psychology