DOCSLIB.ORG

Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S Annual Report and Accounts 197 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S Annual Report and Accounts 197 4 Den norske stats oljeselskap a.s Annual Report and Accounts 1974 statoil Den norske stats oljeselskap a.s Statoil was established by a unanimous decision by the Starting on June 14. 1972. The Company's objectives, as stated in its Articles of Association, are as follows: Statoil has as its objective inde­ pendently, or in participation or in co-operation with other companies to carry out explo­ ration and production, transportation, refining and marketing of petroleum and related products and other activities in close relationship with this. The pipelaying barge Choctaw I working on the Norpipe line from Ekofisk to Emden in West-Germany. so far the worlds longest offshore pipeline. 2 Report for 1974 Preface authorities. Statoil may not in offshore oil activity and parti­ The year 1974 has been a year execute projects with significant cipation in pipeline transpor­ of extensive and increasing political or practical implications tation systems (Norpipe), in the activity for Statoil as a result of before they are approved or petrochemical complex at Bam­ the tasks the Company has been cleared by superior political ble and in the marketing of given through d0cisions taken bodies. It is this principle which the State's royalty crude oil. by the authorities. This has made is now clarified and formalized continuous rapid growth of by the new regulations and the The Board's task to a large the Company's organization Articles of Association for extent is to ensure that Statoil necessary so as to enable it Statoil, approved by the Stor­ discharges its duties with proper to handle the State's business ting in June 1974. care in accordance with the interests in the petroleum sector authorities' wishes and in a way in the best possible way. The new Articles of Association best suited to making the best provide that the Board shall put possible use of the State's busi­ Internationally 1974 has been before the General Meeting all ness interests. At the same time, dominated by the new oil price matters "which can be assumed it is quite clear that the Board's structure and the changed situa­ to have important political as­ role should not be a passive one. tion in petroleum supply. Sharp pects or aspects of principle The Articles of Association give inflation has greatly increased and/or can have important social the Board the necessary freedom the cost of a number of the pro­ and socio-economic impli­ to carry on business within the jects in which Statoil is engaged. cations". The Articles also con­ framework prescribed by the At the same time Norwegian oil tain a list of the most important authorities at any given time. and gas reserves have increased cases covered by this rule. The in value. The international energy new Articles must also be seen It is also one of Statoil's tasks supply situation still seems to in the light of the fact that to act as an advisory agency to be less stable than it used to be. the Starting decided that it shall the authorities. In this connec­ This gives Norway a certain have laid before it each year in tion Statoil will be in a position, global responsibility, a respon­ the form of a Government White thanks to its knowledge and sibility which is acknowledged Paper "the main aspects of expertise, to provide factual in­ by the Norwegian authorities. Statoil's plans and projects to­ formation, to put forward view­ The role of the large private oil gether with economic estimates points and evaluations, and to companies seems to have and other items involving impor­ make suggestions to the authori­ changed as a result of the tant questions of principle or ties as to the courses they nationalization of oil production political aspects". Statoil's plan should follow. in most of the large oil-producing for any year will normally be countries and the expansion of decided upon at a regular Gene­ 3. Concession round the state-owned oil companies ral Meeting in the spring of During 1974 the Government in these countries. But in Europe the preceding year. pronounced its decision on the and elsewhere it also seems third concession round. In ac­ likely that state-owned compa­ These decisions have formalized cordance with the rules laid nies will have increasing impor­ the established practical pattern down by the Storting, this was tance as part of the different of the way business is handled a limited allocation, with five countries' national oil policy. between state-owned companies concession areas, partly along In West Germany, the United and their General Meeting i.e. the median line with UK waters, Kingdom, Canada and Australia The Ministry of Industry. Statoil's and partly in deepwater areas steps were taken during 1974 role and importance in Norwe­ extending to 62 degrees north, to create oil companies under gian society had created a desire close to the coast. While 50% state control and ownership. for such formalized rules. state participation had earlier been the maximum, in the new Relationship with the authorities The aim of these Articles is to concessions it is a minimum. 1974 saw a clarification of ensure the overall governmental Statoil's participation can be in­ Statoil's situation, especially guidance and control which creased with the volume of with regard to its relationship the Storting had indicated that it eventual production and in cer­ with the political authorities. desired. The Company's special tain cases can reach 75%. It has always been quite clear purpose, which is to carry out Statoil has been given the task, that Statoil's objectives are to the decisions of the superior for the first time, of acting as look after the State's business political authorities, has been operator for one area. This is the interests in the petroleum sector underlined by these new Articles. area covering Blocks 15/11, in accordance with the Articles It is a special characteristic of 15/12 and 6/3. The Company of Association, rules and regu­ Statoil's activities that all the has prepared itself for its role lations laid down by the authori­ tasks of any importance have as operator by, inter alia, leasing ties at any given time. Statoil is been given to the Company a drilling rig, supply ships, etc. thus an instrument for the politi­ through decisions either by the An agreement on principles has cal authorities and carries out the Government or by the Storting. been reached with Esso, which objectives decided upon by the This applies to all participation gives Statoil the opportunity to 4 draw on technical and other assi­ When there is a find, the part­ key blocks, which had been set stance from Essa to the extent ners (including Statoil) must aside for State development, that Statoil wishes. decide within certain agreed after the Ministry of Industry had time limits whether they wish given Statoil this planning task As in the case of Statfjord to take part in the development earlier. For the blocks which in (Blocks 33/9 and 33/12), Statoil of the find and in later produc­ Statoil's jugdment should be may take over at a given time tion development. explored in the course of the as operator of the other areas next few years, Statoil submitted al located, except for the area Statoil shall not pay its share a plan whereby the State through where Norsk Hydro is operator. of the development costs ac­ Statoil on the one hand would crued after the find is declared have control with development The conditions in the standard commercial before it has been and exploitation of possible joint-venture agreements which decided that Statoil shall take finds, and which on the other the Government has negotiated part in the development. hand would ensure the Company are based on the same frame­ the necessary technical and work which the Ministry of Indu­ The State's supervision and other assistance. Through the stry first laid down in the Stat­ control is ensured partly through proposed plan, the State will fjord concession in 1973, general rules about different li­ retain full ownership of any although some parts have been cences and through regulations petroleum which might be found. enlarged. Statoil's share of the from the Government, and partly Possible partners will be ensured exploration costs is met by through Statoil, which through the right to agreed amounts of the other partners and Statoil its participation' percentage has produced petroleum from such does not bear these costs, a large say in decisions in the finds through agreements which whether anything is found or not. different joint ventures. will enable the partners to The costs of development /d recover the invested capital with production are borne .. /'· interest and at the same time in full, in proportion t " will give them a reasonable cipation percentage. profit and a risk premium. In accordance with the wishes of \ "~::~ the Government it is also provi­ \'~. ded that the Norwegian compa­ nies Norsk Hydro and Saga \\ Petroleum s~all be broght into ·.. \ the development in some of the . \ \ key block areas in joint-venture agreements with Statoil. In connection with the announce­ ments of the results of the third concession round, the Ministry of Industry in principle made a decision on Statoil's plan for key block development. The Ministry informed Statoil that the plan­ ning necessary for the Ministry to grant production licences for blocks 24/12 and 1/9 could im­ mediately be proceeded with regard to the tempo of develop­ ment of the other key blocks, the Government would bide their time for the moment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stortingsvalget 1965. Hefte II Oversikt
    OGES OISIEE SAISIKK II 199 SOIGSAGE 6 EE II OESIK SOIG EECIOS 6 l II Gnrl Srv SAISISK SEAYÅ CEA UEAU O SAISICS O OWAY OSO 66 Tidligere utkommet. Statistik vedkommende Valgmandsvalgene og Stortingsvalgene 1815-1885: NOS III 219, 1888: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 7, 1889, suppl. 2, 1891: Medd. fra det Statist. Centralbureau 10, 1891, suppl. 2, 1894 III 245, 1897 III 306, 1900 IV 25, 1903 IV 109. Stortingsvalget 1906 NOS V 49, 1909 V 128, 1912 V 189, 1915 VI 65, 1918 VI 150, 1921 VII 66, 1924 VII 176, 1927 VIII 69, 1930 VIII 157, 1933 IX 26, 1936 IX 107, 1945 X 132, 1949 XI 13, 1953 XI 180, 1957 XI 299, 1961 XII 68, 1961 A 126. Stortingsvalget 1965 I NOS A 134. MARIENDALS BOKTRYKKERI A/S, GJØVIK Forord I denne publikasjonen er det foretatt en analyse av resultatene fra stortings- valget 1965. Opplegget til analysen er stort sett det samme som for stortings- valget 1961 og bygger på et samarbeid med Chr. Michelsens Institutt og Institutt for Samfunnsforskning. Som tillegg til oversikten er tatt inn de offisielle valglister ved stortingsvalget i 1965. Detaljerte talloppgaver fra stortingsvalget er offentliggjort i Stortingsvalget 1965, hefte I (NOS A 134). Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Oslo, 1. juni 1966. Petter Jakob Bjerve Gerd Skoe Lettenstrom Preface This publication contains a survey of the results of the Storting elections 1965. The survey appears in approximately the same form as the survey of the 1961 elections and has been prepared in co-operation with Chr. Michelsen's Institute and the Institute for Social Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Norge Og Internasjonal Befolkningspolitikk Ca 1945 - 1980 - Med Vekt På Familieplanlegging
    Norge og internasjonal befolkningspolitikk ca 1945 - 1980 - med vekt på familieplanlegging Av Einar Monstad Masteroppgave i historie Institutt for arkeologi, historie, kultur- og religionsvitskap Det humanistiske fakultet Universitetet i Bergen Våren 2018 i Abstract High birth rates in the world's poorest countries combined with falling death rates due to improved nutrition and health resulted in a rapid increase in the population. Food production could not keep up with the increased population wich could lead to social and political unrest and threaten the West's security. As a small state, Norway could contribute to peace in the world by pursuing economic equalization, but a rapid population growth impedes increased prosperity and a sustainable development, hence population control was necessary to reduce birth rates. From the 1970s, the importance of womens participiation in development was acknowledged, and individual reproductive rights and health became the key to reducing population growth. This master thesis discusses how the challenges related to the rapid population growth were met in Norway. The first part of this thesis questions the effect of rapid population growth on the political socity in Norway. The second part focuses on how Norway met the threat as perceived and described in UN reports, conferences and action plans.The third part focuses on the practical policies that were designed to meet the population growth and implementing the chosen solutions. Forord Først og fremst vil jeg rette en stor takk til min veileder Astri Andresen, som har gitt meg inspirasjon, oppmuntring, støtte og fremfor alt faglig veiledning gjennom de siste to årene. Takk til veiledere og medstudenter i seminargruppen Individ, kultur og samfunn i Europa etter 1800 for mange nyttige innspill.
    [Show full text]
  • Hva Skal Vi Gjøre Med Oljerikdommen?
    Hva skal vi gjøre med oljerikdommen? Forvaltningen av Norges petroleumsinntekter fra 1970 til 2001 Vegard Røneid Erikstad Masteroppgave i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie Det humanistiske fakultet UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Våren 2016 i Hva skal vi gjøre med oljerikdommen? Forvaltningen av Norges petroleumsinntekter fra 1970 til 2001 Vegard Røneid Erikstad Masteroppgave i historie Institutt for arkeologi, konservering og historie Det humanistiske fakultet Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2016 ii © Vegard Røneid Erikstad 2016 Hva skal vi gjøre med oljerikdommen? - Forvaltningen av Norges petroleumsinntekter fra 1970 til 2001 Vegard Røneid Erikstad http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Webergs Printshop iii Forord Å skrive en masteroppgave er en lang og ensom reise. Det er en stor oppgave du til syvende og sist må fullføre alene. Jeg var ikke helt forberedt på hva jeg tok fatt på. Valget av tema for oppgaven gjorde det nok ikke mye enklere for meg, men det gjorde reisen interessant og lærerik, kanskje til og med nyttig. Reisen har ikke bare vært ensom. Underveis har jeg blitt kjent med mange på masterprogrammet i historie, som jeg kommer til å ha kontakt med lenge. Jeg vil først og fremst takke Even Lange for uvurderlig veiledning. Han har vært tålmodig, grundig, konstruktiv, ærlig og hyggelig. Jeg kunne ikke bedt om en bedre veileder. Hjelp og støtte har jeg også fått fra andre. Mamma og pappa har lest gjennom og gitt innspill. Kirsti har gjort det samme, og hun har oppmuntret meg hele veien. I tillegg vil jeg trekke frem min tvillingbror, Anders, som også leverer masteroppgave nå. Vi har vært i samme situasjon, og vi har kunnet dele våre gleder og sorger.
    [Show full text]
  • Samvirkebeskatningen I Norge På 1900-Tallet
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen av Harald Espeli Forskningsrapport 2/2003 Handelshøyskolen BI Institutt for innovasjon og økonomisk organisering Senter for samvirkeforskning Harald Espeli: Samvirkebeskatningen i Norge på 1900-tallet. En historisk analyse av den politiske debatten, regelverket og ligningspraksis med hovedvekt på landbrukssamvirke og forbrukerkooperasjonen. Harald Espeli 2003 Forskningsrapport 2/2003 ISSN: 0803-2610 Handelshøyskolen BI P.b. 580 1302 Sandvika Tlf: 67 55 70 00 www.bi.no Rapporten kan bestilles fra: Norli, avd. Sandvika Telefon: +47 67 55 74 51 Fax: +47 67 55 74 50 Mail: [email protected] 2 Sammendrag og forord Utfra en historiefaglig synsvinkel beskriver og analyserer rapporten utvik- lingen av norsk samvirkebeskatning fra slutten av 1800-tallet og frem til en høyesterettsdom i 2001. Skattelovene av 1911 innebar at samvirkeforetak innen jordbrukssektoren og forbruksforeninger (kooperasjonen) ble under- lagt et særskilt skatteregime frem til skattereformen i 1992. Skatteregimet ble utvidet til fiskerisamvirke i 1931 og salgssamvirke i skogbruket i 1949. Skatteregimet innebar at samvirkeforetak innenfor disse sektorer ble prosent- lignet, ikke regnskapslignet som andre foretak. Prosentligningen innebar at skattbar inntekt ble fastsatt til en viss andel av samvirkeforetakets skattbare formue. Den særskilte skattleggingen av samvirke var motivert utfra et politisk ønske om å fremme organisasjonsformen innenfor utvalgte deler av økonomien på begynnelsen av 1900-tallet. Samtidig erkjente politikerne at ordinær regn- skapsligning ikke uten videre kunne benytte i skattleggingen av samvirke- foretak på grunn av organisasjonsformens særpreg.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Doctoral Año 2016
    TESIS DOCTORAL AÑO 2016 EL PREMIO NOBEL DE LA PAZ EN EL CONTEXTO DE LAS RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES 1901-2015 EUGENIO HERNÁNDEZ GARCÍA LICENCIADO EN DERECHO DOCTORADO UNIÓN EUROPEA DIRECTOR: JAVIER ALVARADO PLANAS I TABLA DE CONTENIDO Introducción. ...................................................................................................................... 1 Alfred Nobel: sus relaciones con la física, la química, LA fisiología o la medicina, la literatura y el pacifismo ...................................................................................................... 4 Alfred Nobel: la física y la química .................................................................................................. 6 Nobel y la medicina ........................................................................................................................ 6 Nobel y la literatura ........................................................................................................................ 7 Nobel y la paz .................................................................................................................................. 8 Nobel filántropo ............................................................................................................................. 9 Nobel y España ............................................................................................................................. 10 El testamento y algunas vicisitudes hacía los premios ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NONVIOLENCE NEWS February - April 2017 Issue 3.4 ISSN: 2202-9648
    NONVIOLENCE NEWS February - April 2017 Issue 3.4 ISSN: 2202-9648 Women of Action in Nonviolence I have nothing new to teach the world. Truth and Nonviolence are as old as the hills. All I have done is to try experiments in both on as vast a scale as I could. ‐Mahatma Gandhi February 2016 | Non-Violence News | 1 President’s Page Women and Action in Nonviolence As Mahatma Gandhi said nonviolence is tool of strong not the weak. It requires strong will, self‐restraint and endurance power. Practicing Nonviolence is bravery at its peak. Women for Gandhi were embodiment of virtues like knowledge, humility, tolerance, sacrifice and faith. Mahatma Gandhi says “Woman is the incarnation of ahimsa. Ahimsa means infinite love, which again means infinite capacity for suffering”. And “Woman is more fitted than man to make explorations and take bolder action in ahimsa (nonviolence)”. “Woman is the embodiment of sacrifice and suffering and her advent to public life should, therefore, result in purifying it, in restraining unbridled ambition and accumulation of property”. “I first learned the concepts of non‐violence in my marriage.” In Gandhi’s opinion (as is tenet of the ancient Vedic wisdom) woman is the companion of man, gifted with equal mental capacities; she has right to participate in the very minutest details in the activities of man and she has an equal right of freedom and liberty with him. She is entitled to a supreme place in her sphere of activity as man is in his. Women, Gender, and Nonviolence in Political Movements ‐ Karen Beckwith, The College of Wooster: Although the ties between women’s rights movements and nonviolence have been deep and enduring” (Costain 2000, 175), women’s movements are not the only movements to rely upon nonviolent collective action.
    [Show full text]
  • Norsk-Kinesiske Diplomatiske Relasjoner Diplomatiske Norsk-Kinesiske Joakim Dragstmo Andersen Dragstmo Joakim
    Norsk-kinesiske diplomatiske relasjoner diplomatiske Norsk-kinesiske Joakim Dragstmo Andersen Dragstmo Joakim NTNU Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet Det humanistiske fakultet Masteroppgave Institutt for historiske studier Trondheim, november 2014 november Trondheim, ihistorie Masteroppgave 1988 og1991 krisen mellom Tiananmen ogDalaiLama, relasjoner diplomatiske Norsk-kinesiske Andersen Joakim Dragstmo Norsk-kinesiske diplomatiske relasjoner: Tiananmen og Dalai Lama, krisen mellom 1988 og 1991. HIST3000 (60 studiepoeng ECTS) Masteroppgave i historie Institutt for historiske studier Norges teknisk-naturvitenskaplige universitet Trondheim, Norge November 2014 Joakim Dragstmo Andersen 1 Introduksjon Norge anerkjente den nye kinesiske staten i 1950, bare noen måneder etter at Mao Zedong proklamerte kommunistenes seier og opprettelsen av Folkerepublikken fra Tiananmen. Norge og Kina har hatt et uavbrutt forhold siden den tiden til nå.1 En av grunnpilarene i forholdet, sett fra kinesisk side, er hvordan Norge forholder seg til Taiwan (Republikken Kina)2, Tibet3, og andre regioner 4 av særlig sensitiv interesse for Kina, men Norges krav til menneskerettigheter kommer ofte i veien. Det er nå litt over tre år siden Nobels fredspris ble gitt til den kinesiske dissidenten5 Liu Xiaobo. Det finnes mange delte meninger om denne prisen, og andre priser utgitt de senere årene av Nobelinstituttet. Det er kanskje ikke så mange som husker Nobel fredsprisen fra 1989, som ble gitt til den kinesiske dissidenten Dalai Lama, men hvordan reagerte den kinesiske regjeringen da? Hva var forskjellene på reaksjonene i 1989 og 2010, og hvordan håndterte den norske regjeringen Kinas reaksjon? Eller hvordan påvirket Tiananmen hendelsene situasjonen mellom Norge og Kina i 1989? 1 Det har til nå vært to stans i de diplomatiske forbindelsene, men ingen fullstendige brudd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates · Econ Journal Watch
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5811 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 10(3) September 2013: 255-682 Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates LINK TO ABSTRACT This document contains ideological profiles of the 71 Nobel laureates in economics, 1969–2012. It is the chief part of the project called “Ideological Migration of the Economics Laureates,” presented in the September 2013 issue of Econ Journal Watch. A formal table of contents for this document begins on the next page. The document can also be navigated by clicking on a laureate’s name in the table below to jump to his or her profile (and at the bottom of every page there is a link back to this navigation table). Navigation Table Akerlof Allais Arrow Aumann Becker Buchanan Coase Debreu Diamond Engle Fogel Friedman Frisch Granger Haavelmo Harsanyi Hayek Heckman Hicks Hurwicz Kahneman Kantorovich Klein Koopmans Krugman Kuznets Kydland Leontief Lewis Lucas Markowitz Maskin McFadden Meade Merton Miller Mirrlees Modigliani Mortensen Mundell Myerson Myrdal Nash North Ohlin Ostrom Phelps Pissarides Prescott Roth Samuelson Sargent Schelling Scholes Schultz Selten Sen Shapley Sharpe Simon Sims Smith Solow Spence Stigler Stiglitz Stone Tinbergen Tobin Vickrey Williamson jump to navigation table 255 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2013 ECON JOURNAL WATCH George A. Akerlof by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 258-264 Maurice Allais by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 264-267 Kenneth J. Arrow by Daniel B. Klein 268-281 Robert J. Aumann by Daniel B. Klein, Ryan Daza, and Hannah Mead 281-284 Gary S. Becker by Daniel B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ragnar Frisch and the Postwar Norwegian Economy · Econ Journal Watch: History of Economic Thought,Ragnar Frisch,Norway,Scandina
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5819 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 11(1) January 2014: 46-80 Ragnar Frisch and the Postwar Norwegian Economy Arild Sæther1 and Ib E. Eriksen2 LINK TO ABSTRACT In Norwegian academic life the memorial Nobel Prize winner Ragnar Frisch (1895–1973) is still a major figure, and he is universally recognized as a great economist. Here the story will be told how he built up the Oslo School of economic teaching and research, and how the Oslo School influenced economic policy in the small, homogeneous, and relatively culturally insular country of Norway. That influence moved the Norwegian economy toward economic planning. During the postwar decades the Norwegian economy achieved economic growth rates similar to other OECD countries, but with significantly higher investment ratios. The Norwegian economy was getting less ‘bang for its buck,’ with the result being lower rates of consumption. At the end of the 1970s the lagging economic performance impelled a change. Much of the present article is a reworking of materials that we have published previously, some with our late colleague Tore Jørgen Hanisch, particularly articles in the Nordic Journal of Political Economy (Eriksen, Hanisch, and Sæther 2007; Eriksen and Sæther 2010a). This article hopes to bring the story and its lessons to a wider audience.3 Translations from Norwegian sources are our own, unless otherwise noted. 1. Agder Academy of Sciences and Letters, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway. 2. School of Business and Law, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway. 3. The present article incorporates some material also used in our ideological profile of Frisch (Sæther and Eriksen 2013) that appeared in the previous issue of Econ Journal Watch.
    [Show full text]
  • Statoil-Annual-Report-1983.Pdf
    Den norske stats oljeselskap a.s Annual report and accounts 1983 - t~ .! —— ~ ~ ~ ~-: ~ - — • — •~~•-•~~ • ~-—~~----- A - - - -~t•- - - -~.. - . ~ ~:~• - . .4 • -- — StOtOil ~k~: E~ - -~--~ ~ - ..,~- ,~. .$•. •- 4~•. ~ .. 4-- Den norske stats oljeselskap a.s Contents The Board of Directors Company Assembly 3 Transfer from Chairman: Chairman: the Statoil Group to Finn Lied, Director Egil Aarvik, Editor the Norwegian society Vice-Chairman: Vice-Chairman: 4 The Statoil Group Fredrik Thoresen, Managing Director Evy Buverud Pedersen, 5 Highlights Thor Andreassen, Managing Director Trade Union Secretary 7 Report of the Board of Benedicte Berg Schilbred, Odd Bakkejord, Trade Union Secretary Directors for 1983 Managing Director Grethe Westergaard-Bjørlo, Teacher 19 Profit and loss statement for Finn T. Isaksen, Managing Director, Bodil Finsveen, Adviser 1983 to 8 June 1983 Egil Flaatin, Director 20 Balance sheet as of 31 Erling Haug, Licence Manager Johan Nordvik, Mayor December 1983 Atle A. Thunes, GBS Manager Martha S~eter, Clerk 22 Comments Bjørn Lian, Section Manager 31 Statoil’s purchase of goods Alternate members: Ama Jørgensen, Economic Coordinator and services Jan Skaar, Director Vidar Thomassen, Systems Engineer 35 Reserves in some important Gerd Schanche, Housewife Lars Bakka, Legal Counsel fields and areas Margaret B. L. Sanner, 36 Exploration and delineation Senior Secretary Alternate members wells in 1983 Hans Jacob Fevang, Planner Alv Jacob Fostervoll, County Governor 37 Survey of Statoil’s interests in Gunnar Langvik, Department
    [Show full text]
  • Samfunnsøkonomen Nr 5
    SAMFUNNSØKONOMEN Returadresse: Samfunnsøkonomene, NR. 5 • 2019 • 133. årgang Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo NR. 5 2019 • 133. årgang SAMFUNNSØKONOMEN Vidar Christiansen, Victor Norman AGNAR SANDMO TEMA: NASJONALBUDSJETTET 2020 • Erling Steigum NASJONALBUDSJETTET 2020: BEDRE RAMMEVERK • Jan Ludvig Andreassen LAVRENTE-ÆRAEN • Fredrik Wulfsberg AKTUELL KOMMENTAR TIL NASJONALBUDSJETTET 2020 • Erling Holmøy KOMMENTARER TIL NASJONALBUDSJETTET 2020 • Kjell Erik Lommerud BLÅGRÅTT BUDSJETT Øystein Foros, Hans Jarle Kind STØRRELSESBASERT PRISDISKRIMINERING Rolf Golombek, Mads Greaker, Snorre Kverndokk FREMTIDEN FOR CCS SAMFUNNSØKONOMEN Innhold • REDAKTØRER NR. 5 • 2019 • 133. ÅRG. Rune Jansen Hagen • UiB Jan Yngve Sand • UiT Gaute Torsvik • UiO TEMA: Manus, annonsebestilling og generell korrespondanse til NASJONALBUDSJETTET 2020 Samfunnsøkonomens redaksjon kan sendes til: [email protected] • LEDER 3 • PROSJEKTLEDER Marianne Rustand • MINNEORD [email protected] Agnar Sandmo 4 Vidar Christiansen og Victor D. Norman • UTGIVER Samfunnsøkonomene Leder: Jan Inge Eidem • AKTUELL KOMMENTAR Nasjonalbudsjettet 2020: Mot et bedre Generalsekretær: Sigurd Løkholm rammeverk for den økonomiske politikken 10 • ADRESSE Erling Steigum Samfunnsøkonomene Lavrente-æraens siste viking 15 Kristian Augusts gate 9 Jan Ludvig Andreassen 0164 Oslo Telefon: 90 86 75 20 Aktuell kommentar til [email protected] Nasjonalbudsjettet 2020 24 www.samfunnsokonomene.no Fredrik Wulfsberg Bankgiro: 8101 48 08221 Kommentarer til Nasjonalbudsjettet 2020 32 Erling Holmøy Mediaplan 2019 • MANUS PUBLISERINGSDATO ANNONSEFRIST Blågrått budsjett for et rikt land 38 Nr. 5 28. okt 15. nov 05. nov Kjell Erik Lommerud Nr. 6 28. nov 18. des 06. des Abonnentene i Norge må beregne 1–3 dager ekstra til postgang •EL ARTIKK Størrelsesbasert prisdiskriminering i det • PRISER norske dagligvaremarkedet: Teori og terreng 42 Abonnement kr. 1100.- Øystein Foros og Hans Jarle Kind Enkeltnr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fame Or Shame? Norway and the Nobel Peace Prize
    Fame or shame? Norway and the Nobel Peace Prize Fredrik S. Heffermehl If a system does not work, don’t work hard to improve it, perhaps a different system is needed. Tony Blair, British Prime Minister I’ll never tire of repeating: we need to demilitarize world affairs, international politics and political thinking. Mikhail S. Gorbachev, Russian statesman Time, April 15, 2020 Table of content Part I In search of the vision lost Behind the flamboyance lurks the flop Oslo, July 2019 Armed but defenseless The testament and its custodians - facts 2007: After 107 years, high time to check Nobel’s intention? Xx10 The mandatory background check 2020: A more proper name: The Nobel disarmament prize «... to see a miracle happen between the nations» Concluding interpretation: Who are the Nobel «champions of peace»? 20 Can the passing of time have changed Nobel’s will? Nobel’s will in Norwegian pockets? Norwegian trustees behaving as owners One hundred years of unused possibilities 27 Part II Who won, and who should have won, 1901–2019? The prize was meant for Nobel’s champions of peace A. Until 1970 - what the Nobel Archives hid B. After 1971 - the hidden popular movement 70-132 Part III With a potential to change the world? 2007: The state of affairs – or affairs of the state? Norway’s parliament – election committee of a Swedish foundation The Norwegian Nobel Committee The Nobel Committee - shielded by national consensus Untidy management of entrusted funds The Norwegian Nobel Institute – the committee’s secretariat Defending Nobel – with the law
    [Show full text]