DOCSLIB.ORG

State Geological Map of Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Geological Map of Ukraine MINISTRY OF ECOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES OF UKRAINE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE USE SGE “ZAKHIDUKRGEOLOGIYA” STATE GEOLOGICAL MAP OF UKRAINE Scale 1:200 000 CARPATHIAN SERIES MAP SHEETS М-34-ХХIX (Snina), M-34-XXXV (Uzhgorod), L-34-V (Satu Mare) EXPLANATORY NOTES Designed by: B.V.Matskiv, B.D.Pukach, Yu.V.Kovalyov, V.M.Vorobkanych Carpathian Series map sheet Editor-in-Chief: S.S.Kruglov Editor: V.V.Kuzovenko Expert of Scientific-Editorial Council: G.D.Dosyn (Lviv Branch of UkrSGRI) English translation (2008): B.I.Malyuk Kyiv – 2001 (2008) State geological map of Ukraine. Scale 1:200 000. Carpathian Series. Map sheets М-34-ХХІX (Snina), M-34-XXXV (Uzhgorod), L-34-V (Satu Mare). Explanatory notes. – 90 pages, 3 figures, 2 annexes. Authors: B.V.Matskiv, B.D.Pukach, Yu.V.Kovalyov, V.M.Vorobkanych Carpathian Series map sheet Editor-in-Chief: S.S.Kruglov Editor: V.V.Kuzovenko Expert of Scientific-Editorial Council G.D.Dosyn (Lviv Branch of UkrSGRI) English translation (2008) B.I.Malyuk, Doctor of Geological-Mineralogical Sciences, UkrSGRI In the Explanatory notes the data on stratigraphy, magmatism, tectonics, history of geological development, geomorphology, hydrogeology, mineral resources and regularities of their distribution for the map sheets Snina, Uzhgorod and Satu Mare within Ukraine are presented. The perspectives for discovery of the ore and non-ore mineral resources, drinking, mineral and thermal waters are evaluated, brief description of ecologo- geological environment in the area is given, the list of disputable problems is provided. The lists of all discovered deposits and occurrences are presented in the annexes. Key words: Eastern Carpathians, scale 1:200 000, Trans-Carpathian Depression. © B.V.Matskiv et al, 2001 (2008) © UkrSGRI, 2001 (2008) 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations used in the text ................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. STUDY DEGREE............................................................................................................................................... 7 2. STRATIFIED UNITS ......................................................................................................................................... 9 LOWER TECTONIC FLOOR ......................................................................................................................... 12 P a l e o z o i c e r a t h e m e ........................................................................................................................ 12 Devonian-Carboniferous Systems undivided.......................................................................................... 12 M e s o z o i c e r a t h e m e ......................................................................................................................... 12 Triassic System ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Triassic and Jurassic Systems undivided................................................................................................. 12 Jurassic System ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Jurassic and Cretaceous Systems undivided ........................................................................................... 13 Cretaceous System .................................................................................................................................. 14 C e n o z o i c e r a t h e m e ......................................................................................................................... 17 Paleogene System ................................................................................................................................... 17 Paleogene-Neogene Systems undivided.................................................................................................. 22 UPPER (THRUSTED) TECTONIC FLOOR................................................................................................... 23 C e n o z o i c e r a t h e m e ......................................................................................................................... 23 Neogene System...................................................................................................................................... 23 Quaternary System.................................................................................................................................. 28 3. VOLCANISM ................................................................................................................................................... 32 Volcanic complexes of Sarmatian volcano-structures...................................................................................... 32 Volcanic complexes of Pontian volcano-structures.......................................................................................... 33 Volcanic complexes of Dakian-Rumunian volcano-structures......................................................................... 34 4. INTRUSIVE ROCKS........................................................................................................................................ 38 Sarmatian intrusive rocks ................................................................................................................................. 38 Pannonian-Pontian intrusive rocks ................................................................................................................... 39 Dakian-Rumunian intrusive rocks .................................................................................................................... 41 5. TECTONICS..................................................................................................................................................... 43 External Carpathians......................................................................................................................................... 43 Internal Carpathians.......................................................................................................................................... 45 6. HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................... 49 7. GEOMORPHOLOGY AND RELIEF-FORMING PROCESSES .................................................................... 54 7.1. Region of Carpathian mountain system..................................................................................................... 54 7.2. Region of polygenic relief in Trans-Carpathian Trough............................................................................ 56 8. HYDROGEOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................... 58 9. MINERAL RESOURCES AND REGULARITIES IN THEIR DISTRIBUTION ........................................... 62 9.1. Combustible minerals ................................................................................................................................ 62 9.2. Metallic mineral resources......................................................................................................................... 62 9.3. Non-metallic mineral resources................................................................................................................. 66 9.4. Underground waters................................................................................................................................... 68 9.5. Regularities in distribution of mineral resources ....................................................................................... 69 10. EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORY PERSPECTIVES............................................................................ 72 11. ECOLOGO-GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS........................................................................................... 74 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................................... 76 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................... 77 Annexes................................................................................................................................................................. 79 Annex 1. List of deposits and occurrences indicated in the maps of mineral resources of map sheets М-34-ХХІX (Snina), M-34-XXXV (Uzhgorod), and L-34-V (Satu Mare). Compiled by B.D.Pukach........... 79 Annex 2. List of deposits and occurrences indicated in the geological map and map of mineral resources in Quaternary units of map sheets М-34-ХХІX (Snina), M-34-XXXV (Uzhgorod), and L-34-V (Satu Mare). Compiled by Yu.V.Kovalyov, V.M.Vorobkanych ........................................................................................... 88 3 Abbreviations used in the text CSF - conventionally-safe factor Derzhgeolkarta-200 - the State Geological Map in the scale 1:200 000 DGM-50 - Deep Geological Mapping in the scale 1:50 000 GM-50 – Geological Mapping in the scale
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carpathian Rus', 1848–1948 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), Esp
    24 Carpathian Rus ' INTERETHNIC COEXISTENCE WITHOUT VIOLENCE P R M!" e phenomenon of borderlands together with the somewhat related concept of marginal- ity are topics that in recent years have become quite popular as subjects of research among humanists and social scientists. At a recent scholarly conference in the United States I was asked to provide the opening remarks for an international project concerned with “exploring the origins and manifestations of ethnic (and related forms of religious and social) violence in the borderland regions of east-central, eastern, and southeastern Europe.” 1 I felt obliged to begin with an apologetic explanation because, while the territory I was asked to speak about is certainly a borderland in the time frame under consideration—1848 to the present—it has been remarkably free of ethnic, religious, and social violence. Has there never been contro- versy in this borderland territory that was provoked by ethnic, religious, and social factors? Yes, there has been. But have these factors led to interethnic violence? e answer is no. e territory in question is Carpathian Rus ', which, as will become clear, is a land of multiple borders. Carpathian Rus ' is not, however, located in an isolated peripheral region; rather, it is located in the center of the European continent as calculated by geographers in- terested in such questions during the second half of the nineteenth century. 2 What, then, is Carpathian Rus ' and where is it located specically? Since it is not, and has never been, an independent state or even an administrative entity, one will be hard pressed to nd Carpathian Rus ' on maps of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology for Participatory GIS Risk Mapping and Citizen Science for Solotvyno Salt Mines
    remote sensing Article Methodology for Participatory GIS Risk Mapping and Citizen Science for Solotvyno Salt Mines Abby Muricho Onencan * , Kenny Meesters and Bartel Van de Walle Policy Analysis Section, Multi-Actor Systems (MAS) Department, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Building 31, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands; [email protected] (K.M.); [email protected] (B.V.d.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-15-27-81-810 Received: 28 September 2018; Accepted: 14 November 2018; Published: 19 November 2018 Abstract: The Horizon 2020 interim evaluation (2017) indicates a steep increase in citizen engagement in European Union Citizen Science (CS) projects, with less than 1% in budgetary terms and minimal influence. Research findings attribute weak CS influence to the restriction of citizen actions to data collection, with minimal or no engagement in co-design, co-creation, data analysis, and elucidation of results. We design a participatory GIS and CS methodology aimed at engaging the citizens in the entire Earth Observation (EO) project cycle. The methodology also seeks to address previous CS project challenges related to data quality, data interoperability, citizen-motivation, and participation. We draw the high-level requirements from the SENDAI framework of action and the three pillars of active citizen engagement, as enshrined in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention. The primary input of the methodology is the Haklay (2018) approach for participatory mapping and CS, and the Reed (2009) stakeholder analysis framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hydrogeological Situation After Salt-Mine Collapses at Solotvyno
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 30 (2020) 100701 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh The hydrogeological situation after salt-mine collapses at Solotvyno, Ukraine T Leonard Stoeckla,*, Vanessa Banksb, Stella Shekhunovac, Yevgeniy Yakovlevc a Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Stilleweg 2, 30655, Hannover, Germany b British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, United Kingdom c National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU), Institute of Geological Sciences, Kyiv, Ukraine ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Study region: The study site is located in the south-western part of the Ukraine, in the area of the Salt mine collapse historical rock-salt mining town Solotvyno. The former mining area is situated in close vicinity to Contamination the River Tisza, the main tributary of the Danube River, the largest river in Europe. Sinkhole formation Study focus: After uncontrolled flooding of several salt mines, a one month advisory mission was variable density flow launched by the European Commission to estimate the impact of the abandoned salt mines (con- Tisza River taining large quantities of salt water) on the environment. As a consequence of the flooding, dozens of sinkholes formed and sinkhole forming processes are ongoing, with sinkhole diameters reaching 250 m. As river contamination by the release of large quantities of saltwater would lead to an international disaster, hydrogeological measurements were taken on-site to study the system. New hydrological insights of the region: At the study site, saturated (hyper-saline) water as well as fresh surface and groundwater were encountered in close vicinity to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geology, Geography And
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 29(3), 512–519. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/112046 Natalia F. Habchak, Lidiya F. Dubis Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 29 (3), 512–519. Prospects for the development of transport network in Transcarpathia within cross-border territories with EU countries Natalia F. Habchak1, Lidiya F. Dubis2,3 1State High Educational Institution «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod, Ukraine [email protected] 2The John Paul II Catholic University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland 3 Lviv National University named by I. Franko, Lviv, Ukraine [email protected] Received: 16.02.2020 Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of the transport network development in Received in revised form: 08.03.2020 Transcarpathia along the border with the EU neighboring countries. The historical stages Accepted: 15.05.2020 of the Transcarpathian transport network formation are considered. The main criteria for evaluation and conformity of the transport network in Ukraine have been determined in accordance with European standards. A number of legislative, regulatory, strategic and programme documents covering the development of the national transport network and border infrastructure within the study area are analyzed. The main factors proving the foreign economic activity of the Transcarpathian region towards the EU market are considered and highlighted. The capacity of transit through Ukraine and Transcarpathia within the cross-border territories are revealed. The necessity of the transport network construction is considered due to the fact that the number of passengers and cargo flows on the state border is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Potential of the Western Ukrainian Borderland
    Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 2017, 7(2), 17–23 DOI 10.4467/24512249JG.17.011.6627 HUMAN POTENTIAL OF THE WESTERN UKRAINIAN BORDERLAND Iryna Hudzelyak (1), Iryna Vanda (2) (1) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) (2) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] Citation Hudzelyak I., Vanda I., 2017, Human potential of the Western Ukrainian borderland, Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 7(2), 17–23. Abstract This article contains the analysis made with the help of generalized quantative parameters, which shows the tendencies of hu- man potential formation of the Western Ukrainian borderland during 2001–2016. The changes of number of urban and rural population in eighteen borderland rayons in Volyn, Lviv and Zakarpattia oblasts are evaluated. The tendencies of urbanization processes and resettlement of rural population are described. Spatial differences of age structure of urban and rural population are characterized. Key words Western Ukrainian borderland, human potential, population, depopulation, aging of population. 1. Introduction during the period of closed border had more so- cial influence from the West, which formed specific Ukraine has been going through the process of model of demographic behavior and reflected in dif- depopulation for some time; it was caused with ferent features of the human potential. significant reduction in fertility and essential mi- The category of human potential was developed gration losses of reproductive cohorts that lasted in economic science and conceptually was related almost a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Природнi Лiси Українських Карпат Natural Forests Of
    Фонд Всесвітній фонд Міхаеля Зуккова природи Michael Succow World Wide Fund Foundation for Nature ПрироднI лIси Українських карПат NATURAL FORESTS OF UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS карти і атласи львів-2018 УДК 911.2:581.9(477:292.452) Природні ліси Українських Карпат / Ред. А. Смалійчук та У. Гребенер – Львів: Карти і Атласи, 2018. – 104 с. A. Smaliychuk & U. Gräbener (Eds) 2018. Natural forests of Ukrainian Carpathians. Carty i Atlasy, Lviv. 104 p. (in Ukrainian). Автори текстів: Улі Гребенер, Ганс Дітер Кнапп, Богдан Проць, Анатолій Смалійчук, Роман Волосянчук. Автори фотографій: Михайло Богомаз, Гартмут Мюллер, Маттіас Шікгофер, Володимир Савчин, Андрій Юзик, Олександр Ярош, Роман Лазарович, Анатолій Смалійчук, Василь Покиньчереда. Детальніше див. на сторінці 103. Карти: Анатолій Смалійчук Дизайн: Ігор Дикий Редактори: Анатолій Смалійчук, Улі Гребенер Наукові рецензенти: проф., д-р Ганс Дітер Кнапп, к.с.-г.н., доц. Микола Чернявський, к.б.н., с.н.с. Богдан Проць Text authors: Uli Gräbener, Hans Dieter Knapp, Bohdan Prots, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Roman Volosyanchuk. Picture authors: Mykhailo Bogomaz, Hartmut Müller, Matthias Schickhofer, Volodymyr Savchyn, Andriy Yuzyk, Oleksandr Yarosh, Roman Lazarovich, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Vasyl Pokynchereda. For more details see page 103. Maps: Anatoliy Smaliychuk Design: Ihor Dykyi Editors: Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Uli Gräbener Scientific eviewr ers: Prof. Dr. Hans Dieter Knapp, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mykola Chernyavskyi, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bohdan Prots Фінансова підтримка проекту здійснюється Федеральним міністерством навколишнього се- редовища, охорони природи та безпеки ядерних реакторів (BMU) в рамках Програми консуль- таційної допомоги для охорони навколишнього середовища (AAP) в країнах Центральної та Східної Європи, Кавказу та Центральної Азії, а також в інших країнах, розташованих по сусідству з Європейським Союзом.
    [Show full text]
  • Floodsite Project Report D22.3
    Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies Scenario Analysis THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BASIN WIDE SYSTEM OF FLOOD WARNING Date April 2008 Report Number Revision Number 3_2_P28 Task Leader VITUKI, Budapest FLOODsite is co-funded by the European Community Sixth Framework Programme for European Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) FLOODsite is an Integrated Project in the Global Change and Eco-systems Sub-Priority Start date March 2004, duration 5 Years Document Dissemination Level PU Public PU PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co-ordinator: HR Wallingford, UK Project Contract No: GOCE-CT-2004-505420 Project website: www.floodsite.net Tisza Basin Flood Warning M22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Report on the development of the basin wide integrated system of Title monitoring, flood forecasting and warning Authors Péter Bartha Contributors Péter Bakonyi, Gábor Bálint, Balázs Gauzer, Károly Konecsny Distribution Public Document Reference T22-09-02 DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Revision Prepared by Organisation Approved by Notes 10/03/07 1_1_P21 PEB VITUKI Initial draft 10/01/08 2_1_P30 PEB VITUKI Draft 10/04/08 2_2_P28 PEB VITUKI final draft 28/02/09 3_2_P28 GAB VITUKI final 10/06/09 3_2_P28 Paul Samuels HR Formatting and filename Wallingford ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project FLOODsite, Contract GOCE-CT- 2004-505420.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Public Purchasing Announcernº3(77) January 17, 2012
    Bulletin ISSN: 2078–5178 of the public purchasing AnnouncerNº3(77) January 17, 2012 Announcements of conducting procurement procedures . 2 Announcements of procurement procedures results . 66 Urgently for publication . 103 Bulletin No.3(77) January 17, 2012 Annoucements of conducting 01230 Municipal Enterprise “Shostka State Plant “Impuls” procurement procedures of Sumy Oblast 41 Kuibysheva St., 41101 Shostka, Sumy Oblast Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: 01097 SOE “Snizhneantratsyt” www.tender.me.gov.ua 32 Lenina St.,86500 Snizhne, Donetsk Oblast Procurement subject: code 11.10.1 – natural gas – 4570 thousand cubic Antonova Olena Mykhailivna meters, 2 lots: lot 1 – natural gas for production of heat energy for the tel.: (06256) 5–24–34; needs of institutions and organizations which are financed from state tel./fax: (06256)5–55–65; and local budget and other economic entities – 570 thousand cubic e–mail: [email protected] meters; lot 2 – natural gas for the own needs – 4000 thousand cubic Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: meters www.tender.me.gov.ua Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; January – December 2012 Procurement subject: code 29.52.1 machines and equipment for Procurement procedure: procurement from the sole participant mining industry, 10 lots: lot 1 cutter–loader УКД 200.250 in a set or Name, location and contact phone number of the participant: PJSC equivalent – 1 unit; lot 2 – offset feed control system OFCS in a set or “PJSC “Naftogaz
    [Show full text]
  • Transcarpathian Art Institute
    ЕРДЕЛІВСЬКІ ЧИТАННЯ, 2013 р. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE TRANSCARPATHIAN ART INSTITUTE №4 The NEWSLETTER of Transcarpathian Institute of Arts Bulletin of scientific and research works of International scientific‐practical conference Uzhhorod, the 13‐14th of May, 2013 Edition Hrazhda Uzhhorod, 2013 2 The Herald of Transcarpathian Art Institute. № 4 LBC 85.103(4UKR) UDC 7.03(477) N 34 The fourth issue of “The Herald of Transcarpathian Art Institute” contains the materials of international scientific and practical conference “Erdelyi’s Lec‐ tures”, held in Uzhhorod on the 14th ‐16th of May, 2013. The scientific analysis of theoretical and practical researches in the sphere of Fine and Decorative‐ Applied Arts, design and art education in Ukraine was given and the problem of interinfluence of the cultures of the European people and the introduction of art education in artistic establishments were touched upon. It is printed according to the decree of Scientific council of Transcarpathian Art Institute since the 25th of January, 2013, protocol №5 Editorial board: Ivan Nebesnyk, Phd of pedagogical sciences, professor, rector of TAI; Mykola Yakovlev, PhD of technical sciences (technical aesthetics), professor, main scientific secretary of NAAU; Mykola Mushynka, academician of NAAU, PhD of philological sciences, professor; Volodymyr Vasylyev, PhD of culturology, professor of Chuvask state university named after I.M. Ulyanov; Orest Holubets, PhD of art criticism, professor; Halyna Stelmashchuk, PhD of art criticism, professor; Mykhaylo Tyvodar, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Serhiy Fedaka, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Ivan Vovkanych, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Roman Yaciv, candidate of art criticism, associate professor, vice rector of LNAA; Odarka Dolhosh, candidate of art criticism; Attila Kopryva, candidate of art criticism, associate professor; Mykhaylo Pryimych, candidate of art criticism, associate professor; Nataliya Rebryk, candidate of philological sciences, vice rector of TAI.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Guidebook
    Geological Survey of Norway State Geological and Subsurface Survey of Ukraine Best practice and standards on geological mapping, data management and information (NUMIRE) joint project under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway contract UKR-12/0012 FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK 2nd General Workshop and Field Trip Kyiv – Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine May 19-25, 2013 General Workshop on the NUMIRE joint project between geological surveys of Norway and Ukraine Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, May 19-25, 2013 Загальний семінар за спільним проектом NUMIRE між геологічними службами України та Норвегії Дніпропетровськ, Україна, 19-25 травня 2013 року CONTENTS Location sketch ............................................................ 3 Object A. Kryvyj Rig Iron-Ore Mining Camp ............ 4 Object B. Khortytskiy Granite Massif....................... 11 Object C. Nikopol Manganese-Ore Mining Camp.... 13 2 General Workshop on the NUMIRE joint project between geological surveys of Norway and Ukraine Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, May 19-25, 2013 Загальний семінар за спільним проектом NUMIRE між геологічними службами України та Норвегії Дніпропетровськ, Україна, 19-25 травня 2013 року Location sketch Crystalline basement slopes routes access/ leave sections Vo ro nez boarding/ Dn h ip sk overnight sites rov a s ko- D one ts ka Ant Volyno- D icline Podilska Kyiv epr e ss Plate ion F Lvivskiy o r Trough e -C a r UKRAINIAN SHIELD p a Folded Carpathit h Donbas ia n T Tr r an o Dnipropetrovsk s u ca g Tr rpa h ou t gh hi a an ns Kryvyj Rig Khortytskiy Iron-Ore Granite Massif
    [Show full text]
  • Oil & Gas Industry of Ukraine
    Oil & gas industry of Ukraine [email protected] 1/2013 Prospectsor oil and gas bearing capacity in Ukrainian sector of the Sea of Azov by a comprehensive assessment of GPS study data Yevdoshchuk M.I., Halko T.M., Sedlerova O.V., Volkov A.V., Yakubenko G.M. Simulation of filter gravel pack in-wash in a well with a significant deviation from a vertical or in horizontal well E. H. Striukov VOLOSHYN Yu.D. Some ways to improve construction technologies for shale gas wells Mysliuk M. A.,. Khominets Z.D., Salyzhyn Yu.,Bohoslavets V.V., Voloshyn Yu.D. e SEFDR Nezalezhnist started to work in the Black Sea The Nezalezhnist self-elevating floating drilling rig (SEFDR) started drilling its first well in the Black Sea on February 01, 2013. These works are performed in Arkhangelsk gas field within the scope of the production plan of Chornomornaftogaz for 2013, which foresees a 40 % increase in production in the area of Black and Azov Sea shelves – from 1,17 to 1,65 billion m3 of natural gas. With the support of Naftogaz of Ukraine, the Chornomornaftogaz PJSC is performing a large- scale production upgrade, which will give the company an opportunity to reach an output rate of 5 m3 of natural gas starting in 2013, and to triple its annual gas production and open several new hydrocarbon fields during next three years. The Nezalezhnist self-elevating floating drilling rig which is provided with modern equipment and, along with Petro Hodovanets SEFDR, is one of the most hi-tech and high-capacity SEFDR in the Black Sea region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central-European “Spiral Arm-Guard” Notes on the Bronze Age Asymmetrical Arm- and Anklets
    Asymmetrical arm- and anklets 201471 J. Gábor Tarbay THE CENTRAL-EUROPEAN “SPIRAL ARM-GUARD” NOTES ON THE BRONZE AGE ASYMMETRICAL ARM- AND ANKLETS The aim of this study is to evaluate seven, unpublished Late Bronze Age (Br D–Ha A1) “spiral arm-guards” (Germ. Handschutzspiralen) from the Delhaes collection (Hungarian National Museum, Budapest). Despite the fact that their exact finding place and circumstances of discovery are unknown, it was possible to locate their presumable place of origin by the aid of the typo-chronological method. Moreover, with the help of macroscopic observations, we could provide new data and questions on the possible manufacturing tech- niques and usage of this important jewelry group. In relation to the above, it was necessary to offer a new overview on the typo-chronological aspects and functional questions of the earlier published artefacts from the Br A2 to the Ha B1. Jelen tanulmány célja, hogy a Delhaes gyűjtemény (Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum, Budapest) hét, eddig közöletlen, késő bronzkori (Br D–Ha A1) “kézvédő tekercsét” vegye vizsgálat alá. Annak ellenére, hogy a tárgyak lelőhelye és pontos előkerülési körülményei ismeretlenek, a tipokronológiai elemzés alapján meg- tudtuk határozni lehetséges készítési területüket, továbbá a makroszkópikus megfigyelések segítségével új adatokkal tudtunk szolgálni ezen jelentős ékszercsoport lehetséges készítéstechnológiájáról és használa- táról. Mindehhez kapcsolódóan elkerülhetetlen feladat volt, hogy egy újabb áttekintést adjunk a korábban már közölt Br A2 és Ha B1 közé keltezhető tárgyak tipokronológiai és funkcionális kérdéseiről. Keywords: collection of István Delhaes, Bronze Age Carpathian Basin, defensive weapon, wearable jew- elries, symbolic objects Kulcsszavak: Delhaes István gyűjteménye, bronzkori Kárpát-medence, védőfegyverek, hordható ékszerek, szimbolikus tárgyak 1 Introduction 1a–c; KEMENCZEI 1988, 53–56, Taf.
    [Show full text]