Expansion Association Confrontation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expansion Association Confrontation Jürgen Wagner EUrope‘s Expansion Neighbourhood Policy, Association the Ukraine and No. 11, January 2016 11, No. the New Cold War Confrontation: Against Russia Information and Society on Politics MEP Lösing, Sabine by Edited Parliament European the from Reports Analyses News, and Sabine Lösing, MEP European Parliament Sabine Lösing, MEP Rue Wiertz WIB 03M023 1047 Brussels Phone: +32 2284 7894 Fax: +32 2284 9894 Email: [email protected] Assistants: Ota Jaksch, Anne Labinski Lokal Offices: Europabüro Sabine Lösing Goseriede 8 30159 Hannover Phone: +49 511 4500 8852 Email: [email protected] Assistants: Daniel Josten, Michael Kuhlendahl Europabüro Sabine Lösing Lange Geismarstraße 2 37073 Göttingen Phone: +49 551 5076 6823 Email: [email protected] Assistant: Fritz Hellmer www.sabine-loesing.de Expansion - Association - Confrontation: EUrope‘s Neighbourhood Policy, the Ukraine and the New Cold War Against Russia Cover Photo: Ukrainian army near sloviansk. Source: Sasha Maksymenko/Flickr Editors of the brochure are Sabine Lösing, MEP and the Parliamentary Group GUE/NGL in the European Parliament. Editing by: Informationsstelle Militarisierung e.V., Hechinger Straße 203, 72072 Tübingen, www.imi-online.de English Translation: Agentur punkt.um, übersetzung, dolmetschen, organisation, Göttingen Publication date: February 2016 (Layout: Daniel Josten) Circulation: 400 Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................5 1. The Ukraine and the Cold War 2.0 .............................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Hegemonic Policy and NATO Expansion ..................................................................................................................................................7 1.2 Russia‘s Roll-Back ..................................................................................................................................................................................8 1.3 European Union vs. Eurasian Union ........................................................................................................................................................9 1.4 Ukraine: A Geopolitical Prize Piece .......................................................................................................................................................10 1.5 Geostrategy by Means of Association: Brussels or Moscow? ................................................................................................................11 2. The Ukraine in the Sights of EUropean Ambitions and Strategies ........................................................................................14 2.1 EUrope as a World Power .....................................................................................................................................................................14 2.2 Imperial Greater EUrope and How To Secure It by Military Means ........................................................................................................15 2.3 Expansion, Phase I: the EU‘s Eastern Enlargement ...............................................................................................................................17 2.4 Expansion, Phase II: EUrope‘s Imperial Neighbourhood Policy..............................................................................................................18 2.5 Neoliberal Association Agreement: The Ukraine as a Typical Example .................................................................................................19 3. The Ukraine as a Test Case for Germany‘s Emerging Ambitions ...........................................................................................23 3.1 New Power – New Responsibility ..........................................................................................................................................................23 3.2 Subversion and Regime Change „Made in Germany“ ............................................................................................................................25 3.3 Tensions Within the Western Camp and German Interests ...................................................................................................................27 4. The Ukraine in a War on Multiple Fronts ..................................................................................................................................31 4.1 From Protest to Coup ............................................................................................................................................................................31 4.2 Consensus on Western Integration – While Power Struggle Continues ................................................................................................32 4.3 The Spiral of Escalation and the Role of External Great Powers ............................................................................................................34 4.4 Replacement of Oligarchs, Exploitation and Repression .......................................................................................................................36 4.5 The Can of Worms Stays Open: Wear and Tear in the „Pro-Western“ Camp..........................................................................................37 5. Cold War: A Self-Fullfilling Prophecy? ........................................................................................................................................41 5.1 The West to be Extended right up to Russia‘s Doorstep? ......................................................................................................................41 5.2 Playing with Fire – NATO Mobilisation and War Games .........................................................................................................................43 5.3 „A Hazardous Game in Full View of a Catastrophe“ ..............................................................................................................................44 5.4 Germany as a „Swing State“? ...............................................................................................................................................................45 5.5 State Capitalism vs. Neoliberalism ......................................................................................................................................................48 5.6 A Chinese-Russian Alliance? .................................................................................................................................................................51 6. Will the Ice Age become Permafrost? .......................................................................................................................................54 Is It All Russia‘s Fault?.................................................................................................................................................................................10 Evil Model: The USA’s “Grand Area” ............................................................................................................................................................16 Gauckism – Nationalism – Global Power ....................................................................................................................................................26 Russia as a Justification for Arms Build-Up ................................................................................................................................................27 Maidan: Controversy Over Fatal Shots ........................................................................................................................................................32 Ukraine: Fascist Revolution .........................................................................................................................................................................33 EU Police Mission: „Disenchantment, Protest and Social Unrest“ ..............................................................................................................35 MH-17: Zenith of Propaganda! ....................................................................................................................................................................42 General Mobilisation: NATO Manoeuvres ....................................................................................................................................................45 Russia as a Justification for Arms Build-Up ................................................................................................................................................46 3 Foreword Considering the level of hysteria in which seems that in the European Parliament in the relationship towards Russia is cur- particular, many of my colleagues are get- rently being discussed here in the „West“, ting all fidgety in their eagerness to start it is sometimes rather difficult to find the a new Cold War with Russia. But what is right balance. On the one hand it is indeed quite certainly
Recommended publications
  • Kleine Anfrage Der Abgeordneten Dr
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 16/424 16. Wahlperiode 20. 01. 2006 Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Dr. Norman Paech, Alexander Ulrich, Paul Schäfer (Köln), Wolfgang Gehrcke, Monika Knoche, Dr. Kirsten Tackmann, Dr. Gregor Gysi, Oskar Lafontaine und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. Atomwaffen in Deutschland Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat sich mit dem am 2. Mai 1975 erfolgten Beitritt zum Vertrag über die Nichtverbreitung von Kernwaffen (NVV) völker- rechtlich verpflichtet, „Kernwaffen oder sonstige Kernsprengkörper oder die Verfügungsgewalt darüber von niemandem unmittelbar oder mittelbar anzuneh- men“ (Artikel II). Im „Vertrag über die abschließende Regelung in Bezug auf Deutschland“ (2+4-Vertrag) vom 12. September 1990 bekräftigten beide deutsche Regierungen den „Verzicht auf Herstellung und Besitz von und auf Verfügungsgewalt über atomare, biologische und chemische Waffen“ (Artikel 3 Abs. 1). Laut einer Studie des Washingtoner Rüstungskontrollexperten Hans M. Kris- tensen, die im Februar 2005 vom „Natural Resources Defense Council“ (NRDC) unter dem Titel „U. S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe“ veröffentlicht wurde und auf freigegebenen US-Regierungsdokumenten sowie der Auswer- tung von Satellitenaufnahmen basiert, lagern auf dem rheinland-pfälzischen Bundeswehr-Standort in Büchel 20 Atombomben, die für den Einsatz durch Piloten und Flugzeuge der Bundeswehr bestimmt sind. Weitere 90 Atomwaffen waren, der NRDC-Studie zufolge, Anfang 2005 in Ramstein stationiert. Unbe- stätigten Medienberichten zufolge sollen diese in Ramstein gelagerten Atom- waffen im Frühjahr 2005 wegen dort stattfindender Bauarbeiten an einen unbe- kannten Ort gebracht worden sein (DER SPIEGEL vom 6. Juni 2005, die tageszeitung vom 9. Juni 2005). Wir fragen die Bundesregierung: 1. Kann die Bundesregierung bestätigen, dass auf dem Bundeswehr-Standort Büchel in Rheinlad-Pfalz mehr als 15 Jahre nach Ende des Kalten Krieges weiterhin Atomwaffen gelagert werden, und wenn ja, wie viele? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Study (In English)
    The Long Shadow of Donbas Reintegrating Veterans and Fostering Social Cohesion in Ukraine By JULIA FRIEDRICH and THERESA LÜTKEFEND Almost 400,000 veterans who fought on the Ukrainian side in Donbas have since STUDY returned to communities all over the country. They are one of the most visible May 2021 representations of the societal changes in Ukraine following the violent conflict in the east of the country. Ukrainian society faces the challenge of making room for these former soldiers and their experiences. At the same time, the Ukrainian government should recognize veterans as an important political stakeholder group. Even though Ukraine is simultaneously struggling with internal reforms and Russian destabilization efforts, political actors in Ukraine need to step up their efforts to formulate and implement a coherent policy on veteran reintegration. The societal stakes are too high to leave the issue unaddressed. gppi.net This study was funded by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Ukraine. The views expressed therein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. The authors would like to thank several experts and colleagues who shaped this project and supported us along the way. We are indebted to Kateryna Malofieieva for her invaluable expertise, Ukraine-language research and support during the interviews. The team from Razumkov Centre conducted the focus group interviews that added tremendous value to our work. Further, we would like to thank Tobias Schneider for his guidance and support throughout the process. This project would not exist without him. Mathieu Boulègue, Cristina Gherasimov, Andreas Heinemann-Grüder, and Katharine Quinn-Judge took the time to provide their unique insights and offered helpful suggestions on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 16/220
    Plenarprotokoll 16/220 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 220. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, den 7. Mai 2009 Inhalt: Glückwünsche zum Geburtstag der Abgeord- ter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE: neten Walter Kolbow, Dr. Hermann Scheer, Bundesverantwortung für den Steu- Dr. h. c. Gernot Erler, Dr. h. c. Hans ervollzug wahrnehmen Michelbach und Rüdiger Veit . 23969 A – zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Erweiterung und Abwicklung der Tagesord- Barbara Höll, Dr. Axel Troost, nung . 23969 B Dr. Gregor Gysi, Oskar Lafontaine und der Fraktion DIE LINKE: Steuermiss- Absetzung des Tagesordnungspunktes 38 f . 23971 A brauch wirksam bekämpfen – Vor- handene Steuerquellen erschließen Tagesordnungspunkt 15: – zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. a) Erste Beratung des von den Fraktionen der Barbara Höll, Wolfgang Nešković, CDU/CSU und der SPD eingebrachten Ulla Lötzer, weiterer Abgeordneter Entwurfs eines Gesetzes zur Bekämp- und der Fraktion DIE LINKE: Steuer- fung der Steuerhinterziehung (Steuer- hinterziehung bekämpfen – Steuer- hinterziehungsbekämpfungsgesetz) oasen austrocknen (Drucksache 16/12852) . 23971 A – zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten b) Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Fi- Christine Scheel, Kerstin Andreae, nanzausschusses Birgitt Bender, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE – zu dem Antrag der Fraktionen der GRÜNEN: Keine Hintertür für Steu- CDU/CSU und der SPD: Steuerhin- erhinterzieher terziehung bekämpfen (Drucksachen 16/11389, 16/11734, 16/9836, – zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. 16/9479, 16/9166, 16/9168, 16/9421, Volker Wissing, Dr. Hermann Otto 16/12826) . 23971 B Solms, Carl-Ludwig Thiele, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der Lothar Binding (Heidelberg) (SPD) . 23971 D FDP: Steuervollzug effektiver ma- Dr. Hermann Otto Solms (FDP) . 23973 A chen Eduard Oswald (CDU/CSU) .
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli-German Relations in the Years 2000-2006: a Special Relationship Revisited
    Israeli-German Relations in the Years 2000-2006: A Special Relationship Revisited Helene Bartos St. Antony’s College Trinity Term 2007 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Modern Middle Eastern Studies Faculty of Oriental Studies University of Oxford To my mother and Joe Acknowledgements I would like to use the opportunity to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Emanuele Ottolenghi, who generously agreed to oversee my thesis from afar having taken up his post as the Executive Director of the Transatlantic Institute in Brussels in September 2006. Without his full-hearted support and his enduring commitment my research would not have materialised. I am further deeply indebted to Dr. Michael Willis who dedicated his precious time to discuss with me issues pertaining to my research. Special thanks also goes to Dr. Philip Robins, Senior Tutor at St. Antony’s College, for having supported my field work in Germany in the summer vacation of 2006 with a grant from the Carr and Stahl Funds, and to the Hebrew and Jewish Studies Committee and Near and Middle Eastern Studies Committee for having awarded me two research grants to finance my field work in Israel in the winter of 2006. Without listing everyone personally, I would like to thank all my interview partners as well as colleagues and friends who shared with me their thoughts on the nature of the Israeli-German relationship. Having said all this, it is only due to my mother and my boyfriend Joe who have supported me throughout six not always easy years that I have been able to study at Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Freitag, 24. April 2009 Namentliche Abstimmung
    Beginn: 11:32 Ende: 11:35 218. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am: Freitag, 24. April 2009 Namentliche Abstimmung Nr.: 2 zum Thema: Antrag der Abgeordneten Paul Schäfer, Monika Knoche, Hüseyin-Kenan Aydin, Dr. Lothar Bisky, Dr. Diether Dehm, Wolfgang Gehrcke, Heike Hänsel, Inge Höger, Dr. Hakki Keskin, Michael Leutert, Dr. Norman Paech, Alexander Ulrich und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. Keine Atomwaffen in Deutschland; Drs.: 16/12684 Endgültiges Ergebnis: Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 500 nicht abgegebene-Stimmen: 112 Ja-Stimmen: 78 Nein-Stimmen: 421 Enthaltungen: 1 ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 24. Apr. 09 Seite: 1 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Ulrich Adam X Ilse Aigner X Peter Albach X Peter Altmaier X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Dr. Wolf Bauer X Günter Baumann X Ernst-Reinhard Beck (Reutlingen) X Veronika Bellmann X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Otto Bernhardt X Clemens Binninger X Renate Blank X Peter Bleser X Antje Blumenthal X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Jochen Borchert X Wolfgang Börnsen (Bönstrup) X Wolfgang Bosbach X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Monika Brüning X Georg Brunnhuber X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Leo Dautzenberg X Hubert Deittert X Alexander Dobrindt X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Maria Eichhorn X Dr. Stephan Eisel X Anke Eymer (Lübeck) X Ilse Falk X Dr. Hans Georg Faust X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Hartwig Fischer (Göttingen) X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E. Fischer (Karlsruhe-Land) X Dr. Maria Flachsbarth X Klaus-Peter Flosbach X Herbert Frankenhauser X Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • White Book on Violations of Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Ukraine (April 2014 — Mid-June 2014)
    WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) OBL_Belaya kniga2_Eng.indd 1 08.07.2014 16:05:26 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation WHITE BOOK ON VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE (APRIL 2014 — MID-JUNE 2014) Moscow June 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Violations of human rights and the principle of the rule of law in the course of the so-called ‘anti-terrorist operation’ ............................... 7 Violations of the right to freedom of thought and belief, including political beliefs; the intimidation and kidnapping of political opponents .................................................................................29 Restrictions on freedom of the media and journalist activities............................................................................... 41 Tragedy in Odessa ...................................................................................... 51 The Snipers’ Case: a mock investigation, violation of the right to the presumption of innocence and of the right to a fair trial ....................................................................... 61 Ethnic and linguistic discrimination, xenophobia and aggressive nationalism. Instigation of racism ..................................... 67 Manifestations of religious intolerance, including threats to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate .................
    [Show full text]
  • W O Rk in G P Aper S E Rie S
    EENeT – Working Paper Series Annual EENeT Conference 2014 in Ávila/ES and EENeT Subgroup Meeting 2015 at CEPOL in Budapest / HU Focussing Radicalisation June 2014 – Mai 2016 EWPS – 003 Aug 2015 EENeT Working Paper Series - 003 Aug 2015 About the European Expert Network on Terrorism Issues The EENeT is an independent, non-partisan consortium of terrorism experts from European law enforcement agencies / relevant authorities and the field of science It is dedicated to a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency analysis and research which is seen as a prerequisite to provide comprehensive insights into the complexity of the phenomenon "terrorism". For more information, visit www.european-enet.org Editorial Mechthild Hellbach – Dr. Uwe Kemmesies Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Germany Editorial Board - EENeT Steering Committee Peter Gridling Federal Agency for State Protection and Counter Terrorism (BVT), Austria Gert Vercauteren Coordination Organ for the Analysis of the Threat (OCAM/OCAD), Belgium Dr. Uwe Kemmesies Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Germany Prof. Dr. Marco Lombardi Catholic University (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Italy Drs. Michael Kowalski National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTV), Netherlands Nigel Inkster United Kingdom, International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) Note The EENeT Working Paper Series is not a peer-reviewed journal. The EWPS contain summaries of conference presentations as well as other findings provided by members or working groups of the EENeT in the periods between the annual meetings, which have been approved for publication by the authors. Responsibility for the content lies with the author/authors. The EENeT does not pursue any (security-) political goals and acts solely as publisher which is why the EENeT may not be identified with the content of the relevant publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Stenografischer Bericht 90. Sitzung
    Plenarprotokoll 16/90 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 90. Sitzung Berlin, Mittwoch, den 28. März 2007 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt 1: Ernst Burgbacher (FDP) . 9071 B Befragung der Bundesregierung: Gesetzent- Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister wurf zur Umsetzung aufenthalts- und asyl- BMI . 9071 B rechtlicher Richtlinien der Europäischen Union; Einführung eines Mindestlohnes . 9065 A Kornelia Möller (DIE LINKE) . 9071 C Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister BMI . 9065 B BMI . 9071 D Josef Philip Winkler (BÜNDNIS 90/ Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 9066 B DIE GRÜNEN) . 9071 D Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister BMI . 9066 C BMI . 9072 A Sevim Dağdelen (DIE LINKE) . 9066 D Dr. Dagmar Enkelmann (DIE LINKE) . 9072 A Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister BMI . 9067 A BMI . 9072 B Ernst Burgbacher (FDP) . 9067 C Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister Tagesordnungspunkt 2: BMI . 9067 D Fragestunde Wolfgang Wieland (BÜNDNIS 90/ (Drucksache 16/4802) . 9072 B DIE GRÜNEN) . 9068 B Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister Mündliche Frage 6 BMI . 9068 C Hans-Kurt Hill (DIE LINKE) Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ Vorlage einer Novelle des Kraft-Wärme- DIE GRÜNEN) . 9068 D Kopplungs-Gesetzes vor dem Hintergrund Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister drängender Investitionsentscheidungen bei BMI . 9068 B kommunalen Energieversorgern und der Ulla Jelpke (DIE LINKE) . 9069 C Erkenntnisse beim Klimawandel sowie Schaffung von Investitionsanreizen in die Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister klimafreundliche Kraft-Wärme-Kopplungs- BMI . 9069 C Technik Josef Philip Winkler (BÜNDNIS 90/ Antwort DIE GRÜNEN) . 9070 B Dagmar Wöhrl, Parl. Staatssekretärin Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble, Bundesminister BMWi . 9072 D BMI . 9070 C Zusatzfragen Sevim Dağdelen (DIE LINKE) .
    [Show full text]
  • Graphika Report Echoes of Fake
    Echoes of Fake News Facebook Downs Assets Linked to Deceptive Websites Run from Separatist-Held Ukraine, First Reported by Die Welt and Netzpolitik Executive Summary On January 12, Facebook ​announced that it had taken down a cluster of accounts, pages and groups that were tied to a network of fake “news” websites across Europe and Central Asia. The websites were routinely pro-Kremlin, anti-Ukraine and anti-Western, and were linked to individuals in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine. As it announced the takedown as part of its ​monthly update on influence operations, Facebook said, “The people behind this deceptive campaign used fake accounts to manage Pages and Groups, drive people to off-platform domains masquerading as independent news entities in countries they targeted, and comment to make their posts seem more popular than they were. Each Page had an accompanying domain and posted content hosted on these websites. It appears that the network accelerated its activity in 2020 and some of its content was re-printed by media organizations in Germany and Russia, including Sputnik Germany … Although the people behind this activity attempted to conceal their identities, our investigation found links to individuals in the Luhansk region in Ukraine and those associated with Borotba, a political group in Ukraine.“ The operation was based around a network of websites; some of these were exposed by a joint report by German outlets ​Netzpolitik.org and ​Die Welt ​in December. That report linked the network to a Crimea-based pro-Kremlin outlet called News-Front, which has already been banned from Facebook and ​YouTube​, but there is insufficient open-source evidence to confirm this attribution with confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf [In Ukrainian] Pratsi
    МІНІСТЕРСТВО ОСВІТИ І НАУКИ УКРАЇНИ ДРОГОБИЦЬКИЙ ДЕРЖАВНИЙ ПЕДАГОГІЧНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ ІМЕНІ ІВАНА ФРАНКА MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE DROHOBYCH IVAN FRANKO STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY ISSN 2519-058X (Print) ISSN 2664-2735 (Online) СХІДНОЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИЙ ІСТОРИЧНИЙ ВІСНИК EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN ВИПУСК 17 ISSUE 17 Дрогобич, 2020 Drohobych, 2020 Рекомендовано до друку Вченою радою Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка (протокол від 30 листопада 2020 року № 17) Наказом Міністерства освіти і науки України збірник включено до КАТЕГОРІЇ «А» Переліку наукових фахових видань України, в яких можуть публікуватися результати дисертаційних робіт на здобуття наукових ступенів доктора і кандидата наук у галузі «ІСТОРИЧНІ НАУКИ» (Наказ МОН України № 358 від 15.03.2019 р., додаток 9). Східноєвропейський історичний вісник / [головний редактор В. Ільницький]. – Дрогобич: Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2020. – Випуск 17. – 286 с. Збірник розрахований на науковців, викладачів історії, аспірантів, докторантів, студентів й усіх, хто цікавиться історичним минулим. Редакційна колегія не обов’язково поділяє позицію, висловлену авторами у статтях, та не несе відповідальності за достовірність наведених даних і посилань. Головний редактор: Ільницький В. І. – д.іст.н., проф. Відповідальний редактор: Галів М. Д. – д.пед.н., доц. Редакційна колегія: Манвідас Віткунас – д.і.н., доц. (Литва); Вацлав Вєжбєнєц – д.габ. з іс- торії, проф. (Польща); Дочка Владімірова-Аладжова – д.філос. з історії (Болгарія); Дюра Гарді – д.філос. з історії, професор (Сербія); Дарко Даровец – д. філос. з історії, проф. (Італія); Дегтярьов С. І. – д.і.н., проф. (Україна); Пол Джозефсон – д. філос. з історії, проф. (США); Сергій Єкельчик – д. філос. з історії, доц. (Канада); Сергій Жук – д.і.н., проф. (США); Саня Златановіч – д.філос.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 37, May-June, 2014
    The Internationalist No. 37 May-June 2014 50¢ Get the Hell Out of Afghanistan and Iraq – And Stay Out! From Ukraine to Middle East: U.S. Imperialism Strikes Out Instigating Ethnic/Religious War in the Name of “Democracy” JUNE 20 – When a right-wing cabal of pro-European Union capitalists, Ukrainian nationalists and fascists seized power in Reuters Kiev in a coup d’état at the end of Febru- ary, their backers in Western capitals hailed this supposed victory for “democracy” and setback for Russia. But the Kremlin’s swift and bloodless takeover of Crimea just days later threw the U.S. and European imperial- ists for a loop. When pro-Russian rebels rose up in eastern Ukraine a month later, quickly gaining popular support, Washington called on its Ukrainian puppets to crack down. But instead of stifling unrest, the military offen- sive provoked massive opposition in the east. A May 2 massacre of dozens of anti-Ki- ev demonstrators by fascists and Ukrainian ethnic nationalists in Odessa (see article, page 12) sealed the division of the country in blood. On May 11, hundreds of thousands turned out in the Russian-speaking eastern oblasts (districts) of Donetsk, Luhansk and Mariupol to vote in a referendum for home rule. The May 25 presidential election (boycotted in the east) solved nothing, and when the new president, Petro Poroshenko, stepped up the “Anti-Terrorist Operation,” indiscriminately shelling residential areas, it only intensified the overwhelming hatred of the Ukrainian nationalist Kiev regime. On top of this disastrous situation in Fascist-led protesters set barricades aflame in Kiev’s Independence Square, 20 February 2014.
    [Show full text]