DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Crises, Security and Climate Change with Adam Lammon, Bianca Majumder and Bradley L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Crises, Security and Climate Change with Adam Lammon, Bianca Majumder and Bradley L Water Crises, Security and Climate Change with Adam Lammon, Bianca Majumder and Bradley L. Nelson WATER CRISES, SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Editors: Geoffrey Kemp and Luke Hagberg with Adam Lammon, Bianca Majumder and Bradley L. Nelson Center for the National Interest The Center for the National Interest is a nonpartisan public policy institution established by former President Richard Nixon in 1994. Its current programs focus on American defense and national security, energy and climate security, regional security in the Middle East, and U.S. relations with China, Japan, Europe, and Russia. The Center also publishes the bimonthly foreign affairs magazine The National Interest. The Center is supported by foundation, corporate and individual donors, as well as by an endowment. Copyright 2018. Center for the National Interest. All Rights Reserved. Water Crises, Security and Climate Change Edited by Geoffrey Kemp and Luke Hagberg with Adam Lammon, Bianca Majumder, and Bradley L. Nelson Center for the National Interest 1025 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 887-1000 E-mail: [email protected] www.cftni.org Cover design by Gabriella Turrisi Photographs from Reuters (top to bottom, left to right): Adrees Latif, Carlos Barria, Mohamed Abd El Ghany, Rafiquar Rahman, Nasser Nuri Acknowledgments Over a period of six years, the project has benefitted from the major contributions from a group of talented and dedicated research interns who worked at various times at the Center for the National Interest. These interns worked closely with the editors and provided substantial written contributions to the study. However, as the scope of the project expanded and evolved, the editors decided to restrict the written text to issues related to fresh water scarcity and sea level rise in certain areas of the world. As a consequence, a considerable amount of writing provided by these research interns has not been included in the final text. We owe all who contributed to this study a great debt: Noah Agily, Maram Alomari, Alec Bania, Marzia Borsoi-Kelly, Chelsea Cohen, Michael Crowley, Jacob Eishen, Ian Engel, Ann Gilligan, Mitchell Hailstone, Zachary Jutcovich, Gray Louis, Jack Mulcaire, Nick Palczew, Philip Rossetti, Samira Seraji, May Stearman, and Benjamin Totto. This project was funded by major grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York, for which we owe our sincere thanks for their patient and consistent support over the years. The project has benefitted from insight provided by Caitlin Werrell and Francesco Femia, co-founders and presidents of the Center for Climate and Security. The study also benefitted from the contribution of scholars and practitioners who met on two occasions at the Tufts European Center in Talloires, France on May 8-11, 2014, and May 5-8, 2015. The participants in the two Talloires workshops on climate change and international security were: Deana Arsenian, Bob Barnes, Uday Bhaskar, Tim Boersma, Brahma Chellaney, Daniel Chiu, Shahram Chubin, Francesco Femia, Corey Johnson, Ellen Laipson, Thomas Mahnken, Jeffrey Mazo, Janne Nolan, Christine Parthemore, David Slayton, David Titley, Stacy VanDeveer, Caitlin Werrell, and Dov Zakheim. We also owe a great debt to the Director of the Tufts European Center, Gabriella Goldstein. Without her exceptional support, these workshops would not have been possible. Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Water and National Security ...................................................................................................... 9 Part I: Fresh Water Scarcity and Security Challenges in the Greater Middle East and South-Central Asia...................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 2: Drought and the Syrian Crisis.................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 3: Yemen’s Water Crisis and State Collapse ........................................................................... 35 Chapter 4: Iran and Afghanistan .................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 5: The Indus River Dispute ........................................................................................................... 57 Chapter 6: Fresh Water and the Nile Basin............................................................................................... 65 Chapter 7: Central Asian Water Disputes ................................................................................................. 75 Part II: The Threat of Sea Level Rise ....................................................................................... 83 Chapter 8: Low-Lying Countries ................................................................................................................. 87 Chapter 9: Effects of Sea Level Rise on River Basins .......................................................................... 99 Chapter 10: Alaska and the Arctic ............................................................................................................ 105 Chapter 11: Challenges for the U.S. Eastern Seaboard ...................................................................... 111 Chapter 12: The Hurricane Season of 2017 ........................................................................................... 125 Part III: Implications ................................................................................................................ 135 Chapter 13: Future Challenges .................................................................................................................. 137 Appendix .................................................................................................................................... 153 Weather and War: Historical Examples .................................................................................................. 155 Maps Illustrating the Resource Nexus……………………………………………..……..…………….10 Rivers Feeding into the Sistan………………………………………………………..….………47 Indus Water Treaty, 1960……………………………………………………….….…….….......59 Vulnerability of Bangladesh…………………………………………………………..………....95 Impact of 1-Meter Sea Level Rise on the Nile Delta…………….……………….…..…….......101 Shrinking Arctic Ice, 1970-2100……………………………………………………..…………108 Impact of 1.5-Meter Sea Level Rise on Southern Florida………………………………...……115 Hampton Roads Infrastructure: Potential Impact of Sea Level Rise on Military Sites…..…….117 Impact of 1-Meter Sea Level Rise on Louisiana……………………………………………….123 Executive Summary The historically severe drought in Syria from 2006-2011 led to the migration of rural communities to already overburdened urban centers, which concurrent with the state’s mismanagement of freshwater resources, helped foment the social unrest and the uprisings against President Bashar al-Assad. The ongoing conflict has had repercussions around the globe with refugees fleeing to, and having an unmistakable political impact upon, neighboring states and Europe. The war in Yemen was rooted in the Arab Spring, but while the attempts to overthrow President Ali Abdullah Saleh were eventually successful, the political transition was not. The overextraction of Yemen’s groundwater led to an unprecedented water crisis that has been exacerbated by the civil war. Terrorist cells, militant insurgencies, and foreign interventions have undermined efforts to reform the Yemeni government and address this humanitarian catastrophe. Conflict over water does not always result in overt violence, although it often produces complex interstate tensions. Water-sharing agreements in South Asia, often drafted by colonial powers, are outdated and have been further complicated by the impact of rising temperatures on the long-term sustainability of waterways fed by glacial melt. India and Pakistan’s dispute over the Indus River’s allocation is both complicated by their colonial history and the disputed territory of Kashmir through which the river and its tributaries flow. While resolving this particular issue would be one step of many towards mending their bilateral relations, establishing a basis for cooperation would reduce tensions and meet mutual objectives of stable water supplies. The Helmand River, shared between Iran and Afghanistan, has been the subject of repeated negotiations, since the two countries are at different stages in their infrastructural development and neither efficiently utilizes the freshwater capacity currently allotted to them. Iran’s subversive employment of the Taliban against Afghan development projects to prevent losing water resources reveals that non-state actors can be directed by states to exploit issues of water scarcity, or they themselves can target water supplies for their own objectives, as has happened repeatedly in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. 1 Water Crises, Security and Climate Change In the Nile River Delta and the Central Asian Republics, the multilateral nature of disputes over limited freshwater resources only increases the difficulty of negotiations. Upstream states can exert outsized influence over freshwater flows and unilaterally affect downstream flow by building dams for hydropower,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East?
    UNIDIR/98/23 UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East? Bjørn Møller Gustav Däniker Shmuel Limone Ioannis A. Stivachtis UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1998 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. UNIDIR/98/23 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.98.0.27 ISBN 92-9045-129-7 Table of Contents Page Preface—Ioannis A. Stivachtis .................................. vii List of Acronyms............................................ xv Part I Chapter 1 Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East Bjørn Møller ............................................. 3 I. The Basic Idea of NOD ................................ 3 II. The Middle East and Europe Compared................... 34 III. Common Security and NOD for the Middle East? ........... 49 IV. The Role of External Powers ........................... 80 V. Perspectives ........................................ 87 Part II Chapter 1 Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East: Necessity versus Feasibility Ioannis A. Stivachtis ...................................... 93 I. NOD and Related Concepts ............................ 93 II. NOD in the Middle East: Is it Feasible? .................. 106 III. Conclusion ........................................ 113 v vi Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East? Chapter 2 Cooperative Security and Non-Offensive Defence in the Middle East Gustav Däniker ......................................... 115 I. NOD and the Middle East Challenge ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and Iraq: the Perils (And Prospects) of Proximity
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT I RAQ AND I TS N EIGHBORS Iraq’s neighbors are playing a major role—both positive and negative—in the stabilization and reconstruction of “the new Iraq.” As part of the Institute’s “Iraq and Henri J. Barkey Its Neighbors” project, a group of leading specialists on the geopolitics of the region and on the domestic politics of the individual countries is assessing the interests and influence of the countries surrounding Iraq. In addition, these specialists are examining how Turkey and Iraq the situation in Iraq is impacting U.S. bilateral relations with these countries. Henri Barkey’s report on Turkey is the first in a series of USIP special reports on “Iraq The Perils (and Prospects) of Proximity and Its Neighbors” to be published over the next few months. Next in the series will be a study on Iran by Geoffrey Kemp of the Nixon Center. The “Iraq and Its Neighbors” project is directed by Scott Lasensky of the Institute’s Research and Studies Program. For an overview of the topic, see Phebe Marr and Scott Lasensky, “An Opening at Sharm el-Sheikh,” Beirut Daily Star, November 20, 2004. Henri J. Barkey is the Bernard L. and Bertha F. Cohen Professor of international relations at Lehigh University. He served as a member of the U.S. State Department Policy Planning Staff (1998–2000), working primarily on issues related to the Middle East, the eastern Mediterranean, and intelligence matters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania
    The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania Prepared for the US Department of Defense’s Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance May 2020 Written by: Jonah Bhide Grace Frazor Charlotte Gorman Claire Huitt Christopher Zimmer Under the supervision of Dr. Joshua Busby 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 United States 8 Oceania 22 China 30 Australia 41 New Zealand 48 France 53 Japan 61 Policy Recommendations for US Government 66 3 Executive Summary Research Question The current strategic landscape in Oceania comprises a variety of complex and cross-cutting themes. The most salient of which is climate change and its impact on multilateral political networks, the security and resilience of governments, sustainable development, and geopolitical competition. These challenges pose both opportunities and threats to each regionally-invested government, including the United States — a power present in the region since the Second World War. This report sets out to answer the following questions: what are the current state of international affairs, complexities, risks, and potential opportunities regarding climate security ​ issues and geostrategic competition in Oceania? And, what policy recommendations and approaches should the US government explore to improve its regional standing and secure its national interests? The report serves as a primer to explain and analyze the region’s state of affairs, and to discuss possible ways forward for the US government. Given that we conducted research from August 2019 through May 2020, the global health crisis caused by the novel coronavirus added additional challenges like cancelling fieldwork travel. However, the pandemic has factored into some of the analysis in this report to offer a first look at what new opportunities and perils the United States will face in this space.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate
    Order Code RL31607 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate October 16, 2002 name redacted, Meaghan Marshall, name redacted Research Associates Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division name redacted Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate Summary The debate over whether, when, and how to prosecute a major U.S. military intervention in Iraq and depose Saddam Hussein is complex, despite a general consensus in Washington that the world would be much better off if Hussein were not in power. Although most U.S. observers, for a variety of reasons, would prefer some degree of allied or U.N. support for military intervention in Iraq, some observers believe that the United States should act unilaterally even without such multilateral support. Some commentators argue for a stronger, more committed version of the current policy approach toward Iraq and leave war as a decision to reach later, only after exhausting additional means of dealing with Hussein’s regime. A number of key questions are raised in this debate, such as: 1) is war on Iraq linked to the war on terrorism and to the Arab-Israeli dispute; 2) what effect will a war against Iraq have on the war against terrorism; 3) are there unintended consequences of warfare, especially in this region of the world; 4) what is the long- term political and financial commitment likely to accompany regime change and possible democratization in this highly divided, ethnically diverse country; 5) what are the international consequences (e.g., to European allies, Russia, and the world community) of any U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Internal Conflict: the Emergent Practice of Climate Security
    Journal of Peace Research 2021, Vol. 58(1) 186–194 Beyond internal conflict: The emergent ª The Author(s) 2020 Article reuse guidelines: practice of climate security sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0022343320971019 journals.sagepub.com/home/jpr Joshua W Busby LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Austin-Texas Abstract The field of climate and security has matured over the past 15 years, moving from the margins of academic research and policy discussion to become a more prominent concern for the international community. The practice of climate and security has a broad set of concerns extending beyond climate change and armed conflict. Different national governments, international organizations, and forums have sought to mainstream climate security concerns empha- sizing a variety of challenges, including the risks to military bases, existential risks to low-lying island countries, resource competition, humanitarian emergencies, shocks to food security, migration, transboundary water manage- ment, and the risks of unintended consequences from climate policies. Despite greater awareness of these risks, the field still lacks good insights about what to do with these concerns, particularly in ‘fragile’ states with low capacity and exclusive political institutions. Keywords climate change, climate security, environmental security, human security During a visit to the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu in security; and third, how policy can be made more effec- 2019, UN Secretary-General Anto´nio Guterres wrote on tive going forward. Twitter: ‘We must stop Tuvalu from sinking and the world from sinking with Tuvalu’ (United Nations, The challenges 2019). Guterres underscored the existential risks of cli- mate change for low-lying island countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The UN Security Council and Climate Change
    Research Report The UN Security Council and Climate Change Dead trees form an eerie tableau Introduction on the shores of Maubara Lake in Timor-Leste. UN Photo/Martine Perret At the outset of the Security Council’s 23 Feb- particular the major carbon-emitting states, will ruary 2021 open debate on climate and security, show the level of commitment needed to reduce world-renowned naturalist David Attenborough carbon emissions enough to stave off the more dire delivered a video message urging global coopera- predictions of climate modellers. tion to tackle the climate crisis. “If we continue on While climate mitigation and adaptation 2021, No. #2 21 June 2021 our current path, we will face the collapse of every- measures are within the purview of the UN thing that gives us our security—food production; Framework Convention on Climate Change This report is available online at securitycouncilreport.org. access to fresh water; habitable, ambient tempera- (UNFCCC) and contributions to such measures tures; and ocean food chains”, he said. Later, he are outlined in the Paris Agreement, many Secu- For daily insights by SCR on evolving Security Council actions please added, “Please make no mistake. Climate change rity Council members view climate change as a subscribe to our “What’s In Blue” series at securitycouncilreport.org is the biggest threat to security that humans have security threat worthy of the Council’s attention. or follow @SCRtweets on Twitter. ever faced.” Such warnings have become common. Other members do not. One of the difficulties in And while the magnitude of this challenge is widely considering whether or not the Council should accepted, it is not clear if the global community, in play a role (and a theme of this report) is that Security Council Report Research Report June 2021 securitycouncilreport.org 1 1 Introduction Introduction 2 The Climate-Security Conundrum 4 The UN Charter and Security there are different interpretations of what is on Climate and Security, among other initia- Council Practice appropriate for the Security Council to do tives.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Climate Change and Human Security
    University of Texas at El Paso ScholarWorks@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2020-01-01 Understanding the Connections: An Analysis of Climate Change and Human Security Erica Martinez University of Texas at El Paso Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Martinez, Erica, "Understanding the Connections: An Analysis of Climate Change and Human Security" (2020). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 3002. https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/3002 This is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING THE CONNECTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN SECURITY ERICA MARTINEZ Master’s Program in Political Science APPROVED: _______________________________________________ Charles R. Boehmer, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________________________ Irasema Coronado, Ph.D., Co-Chair ________________________________________________ William L. Hargrove, Ph.D. _________________________________________ Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Erica Martinez 2020 DEDICATION To Sophie, the light of my life. UNDERSTANDING THE CONNECTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN SECURITY by ERICA MARTINEZ, B.A. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I consider myself tremendously fortunate to be surrounded by intelligent, kind, and motivating people who inspire me daily.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field of Climate and Security: a Scan of the Literature
    THE FIELD OF CLIMATE AND SECURITY: A SCAN OF THE LITERATURE APRIL 2019 JOSHUA BUSBY LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin This work carries a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. This license permits you to copy, distribute, and display this work as long as you mention and link back to the Social Science Research Council, attribute the work appropriately (including both author and title), and do not adapt the content or use it commercially. For details, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/. 1 About the SSRC Introduction The Social Science Research Council The SSRC Academic Network on Peace, Security, and the United (SSRC) is an independent, international, Nations is a new Council initiative that emerged out of a request nonprofit organization founded in 1923. from the UN Secretariat to provide UN entities and departments It fosters innovative research, nurtures charged with responsibility for peace and security with better, more new generations of social scientists, systematic access to new and emerging research from the field deepens how inquiry is practiced within and from within the academy. The Network also aims to facilitate and across disciplines, and mobilizes collaborative engagements between various institutions, research necessary knowledge on important networks, and professional associations on conflict-management public issues. relevant research, and between the UN and these academic institutions. The first meeting of the Academic Network examined the frameworks and methodologies used by academics to study the nexus between climate change and risks to sustaining peace, as well as the ways in which climate factors might affect the UN prevention agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change, Migration, and Resiliency in South Asia: Cooperation for Climate Security
    THE U.S. ASIA-PACIFIC REBALANCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE A Climate and Security Correlations Series Edited by Caitlin E. Werrell and Francesco Femia November 2015 in partnership with CLIMATE CHANGE, MIGRATION, AND RESILIENCY IN SOUTH ASIA: COOPERATION FOR CLIMATE SECURITY Arpita Bhattacharyya and Michael Werz Center for American Progress Climate change is not a future challenge ‒ it is happening today. Tis March, U.S. Ambassador to India Rich Verma underlined this point in a speech in Kolkata. Verma warned that India and Bangladesh are already feeling the impacts of climate change, mentioning the 2014 fooding in Jammu and Kashmir, along with foods in Uttarakhand in 2013 and Assam in 2012, which displaced 1.5 million people. “Tis intersection of climate change, human migration, and governance will present novel challenges for South Asia in the decades to come,” he argued.1 Last year, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on “Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability” made clear that the impacts of a warmer climate will intensify in the coming decades. Asia is experiencing more extreme temperatures and shifs in precipitation due to climate change, contributing to water scarcity and declining food production in many areas. Te IPCC report also projects that climate change will exacerbate existing pressure on natural resources and environmental degradation occurring in Asian cities already straining to accommodate rapid urbanization, industrialization, and economic development.2 A recent report by the Asian Development Bank estimates that South Asia risks losing almost 2 percent from annual gross domestic product by 2050 if fossil-fuel intensive energy consumption goes unchecked.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantis 2.0: How Climate Change Could Make States Disappear – and What That Means for Global Security Andrew Holland1 and Esther Babson2
    EPICENTERS OF CLIMATE AND SECURITY: THE NEW GEOSTRATEGIC LANDSCAPE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE June 2017 Edited by: Caitlin E. Werrell and Francesco Femia Sponsored by: In partnership with: DISAPPEARING ISLANDS ATLANTIS 2.0: HOW CLIMATE ChaNGE COULD MAKE STATES DISAPPEAR – AND WhaT ThaT MEANS FOR GLOBAL SECURITY Andrew Holland1 and Esther Babson2 INTRODUCTION In the Fourth Century B.C., Plato wrote of how the great city of Atlantis was submerged beneath the ocean as punishment by the gods for becoming corrupt and greedy. In Plato’s telling, an advanced civilization was lost forever in a single day because its people had strayed from the will of the gods. Since then, the story – whether based in historical truth or only a lesson in morality – has captivated generations. Now, 2300 years later, the world may be facing a new Atlantis, as sea level rise – caused by climate change – is threatening to inundate civilizations again. The threat is global, but it is not shared equally. Like most of the effects of climate change, those most harmed by it are the populations with the fewest resources. At first, the greatest impacts will be felt by those living on low-lying islands like Kiribati and the Marshall Islands in the Pacific or the Maldives in the Indian Ocean. Life is difficult enough on these small islands, surrounded by the vastness of the ocean, without adding the challenges of sea level rise, more dangerous extreme weather, and the loss of food and fresh water resources. Unlike Plato’s Atlantis, however, the threat to small islands is easily predictable, if not preventable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Dilemma Challenges for German and American Foreign Policy
    THE IRANIAN DILEMMA t CHALLENGES FOR GERMAN AND AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Washington, D.C. 21 April 1997 Conference Repor American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University Conference Report THE IRANIAN DILEMMA CHALLENGES FOR GERMAN AND AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Peter Rudolf Geoffrey Kemp Washington, D.C. 21 April 1997 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (AICGS) is a center for advanced research, study, and discussion on the politics, culture, and society of the Federal Republic of Germany. Established in 1983 and affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University but governed by its own Board of Trustees, AICGS is a privately incorporated institute dedicated to independent, critical, and comprehensive analysis and assessment of current German issues. Its goals are to help develop a new generation of American scholars with a thorough understanding of contemporary Germany, deepen American knowledge and understanding of current German developments, contribute to American policy analysis of problems relating to Germany, and promote interdisciplinary and comparative research on Germany. Executive Director: Jackson Janes Research Director: Carl Lankowski Director of Development: William S. Stokes IV Board of Trustees, Cochair: Steven Muller Board of Trustees, Cochair: Harry J. Gray The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©1997 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-21-0 Additional copies are available from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • American Policy and Changing Alignments in the Middle East
    American Policy and Changing Alignments in the Middle East Adam Lammon American Policy and Changing Alignments in the Middle East Geoffrey Kemp, John Allen Gay, Adam Lammon Center for the National Interest The Center for the National Interest is a nonpartisan public policy institution established by former President Richard Nixon in 1994. Its current programs focus on American defense and national security, energy and climate security, regional security in the Middle East, and U.S. relations with China, Japan, Europe, and Russia. The Center also publishes the bimonthly foreign affairs magazine The National Interest. The Center is supported by foundation, corporate and individual donors, as well as by an endowment. Copyright 2018. Center for the National Interest. All Rights Reserved. American Policy and Changing Alignments in the Middle East By Geoffrey Kemp, John Allen Gay, Adam Lammon Center for the National Interest 1025 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 887-1000 E-mail: [email protected] www.cftni.org Cover design by Gabriella Turrisi Photographs from Reuters: From top (front to back): Yannis Behrakis, Reuters, Erik de Castro, Azad Lashkari Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation and with encouragement from the Center for the National Interest’s Executive Director, Paul J. Saunders. The Center for the National Interest would like to thank Henri Barkey, Fiona Hill, Dennis Ross, James Dobbins, Steven Szabo, and Charles W. Freeman for their participation in a series of seminars that were invaluable in structuring the research and argumentation, as well as the Center’s former Program Assistant, Luke Hagberg, and interns Bradley L.
    [Show full text]