The UN Security Council and Climate Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Horasis the Global Visions Community
Horasis The Global Visions Community Horasis Global Meeting 5 - 8 May, 2018, Cascais, Portugal Inspiring our future Under the patronage of the President of the Republic of Portugal Co-hosts: • City of Cascais • Government of Portugal Co-chairs: • José Manuel Barroso, Chairman, Goldman Sachs International, United Kingdom • Vijay Eswaran, Chairman, QI Ltd, Hong Kong • Nobuyuki Idei, Chief Executive Officer, Quantum Leaps Corporation, Japan • Timothy Lane, Deputy Governor, Bank of Canada, Canada • Pedro Duarte Neves, Alternate Chairperson, European Banking Authority , United Kingdom • John D. Negroponte, Vice Chairman, McLarty Associates, USA • Mohan Das Pai, Chairman, Manipal Global Education, India • Lila Tretikov, Chief Executive Officer, Terrawatt Initiative, France • Deborah Wince-Smith, President, United States Council on Competitiveness, USA Knowledge Partners: • Estoril Sol • Hill & Knowlton Strategies • Oxford Analytica Institutional Partners: • CIP - Confederation of Portuguese Business • IE Business School 1 Horasis: The Global Visions Community Switzerland, CH-8280 Kreuzlingen, Burgstrasse 8, www.horasis.org phone +41 79 305 3110, fax +41 71 686 50 59, mail [email protected] Horasis The Global Visions Community Day one – 5 May Day two – 6 May Day three – 7 May Day four – 8 May Congress Centre / Palacio Congress Centre / Casino Congress Centre Congress Centre 07.30-09.15 Breakfasts 07.30-08.45 Breakfasts 08.00-09.30 Breakfasts - Europe - Power of Love - Inspired for Life - Populism - Tell your Story - Rethinking Capitalism - -
Economic Inequality and Social Progress1
Chapter 3: Economic inequality and social progress1 Coordinating Lead Authors: Stephan Klasen, Giovanni Andrea Cornia, Rebeca Grynspan, Luis F. López-Calva, Nora Lustig2 Lead Authors: Augustin Fosu, Sripad Motiram, Flora Myamba, Andreas Peichl, Sanjay Reddy, Eldar Shafir, Ana Sojo, Ingrid Woolard3 Contributing Authors: Shai Davidai, Michael Förster, Rahul Lahoti, Judith Sutz, Rainer Thiele4 Abstract Inequality and its effects on societies have received increasing prominence in debates among economists and social scientists and in policy circles over the past thirty years. There are many, often interacting inequalities and different forms of inequality. Wide income and wealth inequality has harmful consequences for the economic welfare of societies, social cohesion, and other factors that intrinsically and instrumentally diminish social progress. While between- country income inequality has been falling recently, within-country inequality has been rising to varying degrees in most industrialized and many developing countries, though the experience of 1 Acknowledgments: Note that all authors have contributed to this chapter in their personal capacity and any views expressed here should not be attributed to the organizations the authors are affiliated to. 2 Affiliations: University of Florence, Florence; Ibero-American General Secretariat, Madrid; University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; World Bank, Washington, DC; Tulane University, New Orleans. 3 Affiliations: University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana; University of Massachusetts, Boston, and Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai; REPOA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany; The New School, New York; Princeton University, Princeton, NJ; United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile; University of Cape Town, Cape Town. -
Commemoration of the Signing of the Charter of the United Nations Programme
COMMEMORATION OF THE SIGNING OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS Friday, 26 June 2020, 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. (New York time) Virtual meeting, UN Headquarters, New York PROGRAMME 9:00 – 10:00 1. Solemn Charter Commemoration a.m. Video Presentation Milestones and achievements of the UN Charter Opening Statements – Principals organs of the United Nations: ▪ H.E. Prof. Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, President of the seventy-fourth session of the General Assembly ▪ H.E. Mr. António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations ▪ H.E. Mr. Jean-Yves Le Drian, Minister for Foreign Affairs of France, President of the Security Council ▪ H.E. Ms. Mona Juul, President of the Economic and Social Council and Permanent Representative of Norway to the United Nations ▪ H.E. Mr. Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, President of the International Court of Justice Statements from the Chairs of the Regional Groups and from the host country: ▪ H.E. Mr. Collen Vixen Kelapile, Permanent Representative of Botswana to the United Nations and Chair of the Group of African States ▪ H.E. Mr. Zhang Jun, Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations and Chair of the Group of Asia-Pacific States ▪ H.E. Mrs. Marie Chatardová, Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the United Nations and Chair of the Group of Eastern European States ▪ H.E. Mr. Néstor Popolizio, Permanent Representative of Peru to the United Nations and Chair of the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States 1 ▪ H.E. Mr. Jörundur Valtýsson, Permanent Representative of Iceland to the United Nations and Chair of the Group of Western European and other States ▪ H.E. -
The Secretary-General Message to the Solemn
THE SECRETARY-GENERAL MESSAGE TO THE SOLEMN MEETING ON THE THIRTY-EIGHTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY (To be read on his behalf by Mr. Ibrahim Gambari, Under-Secretary- General' and Special Adviser on Africa) New York, 24 May 2001 I send my congratulations and best wishes to the Organisation of African Unity, which for 38 years has been the voice of Africa in the concert of nations, and has helped Africa to play its part on the international stage. More than that, the OAU has provided African states with a clear goal and a collective vision. In the years since 1963 steady progress has been made in forging closer links between the peoples of Africa - at regional and sub-regional levels - and in strengthening co-operation among them. Just as we remember with gratitude the OAU's role as a rally ing-point during the liberation struggle, so today we applaud its efforts to mobilise the collective will of the continent against mankind's ancient enemies - war, want, and disease - even when they take on new and hideous forms such as HIV/AIDS. Just last month, we saw a clear illustration of the OAU's continuing relevance in the successful convening and outcome of the Abuja summit on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and other infectious diseases. Today, as Africa takes on the challenges and seizes the opportunities of globalisation, we see the OAU providing once again an indispensable forum and structure where its member states can consult and plan how best to further their shared interests. We also see African leaders planning to transform the OAU into a deeper "African Union" - a bold endeavour which deserves the fullest support from the international community. -
Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation Garret Brouwer
Arbitration Law Review Volume 3 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 37 7-1-2011 The Go-Between: Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation Garret Brouwer Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/arbitrationlawreview Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Garret Brouwer, The Go-Between: Jan Eliasson and the Styles of Mediation, 3 464 (2011). This Student Submission - Book and Literature Review is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arbitration Law Review by an authorized editor of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GO-BETWEEN: JAN ELIASSON AND THE STYLES OF MEDIATION By Garret Brouwer* War and conflict have existed as long as humanity. Sometimes these conflicts can be solved with words. Unfortunately, many others are solved with weapons. With the rise of modern technology in the 20th century, the world has become smaller than ever. Humans can instantaneously communicate with one another across the planet. Economies are increasingly dependent on international trade and cooperation. Nation states have vested political interests in their neighbors and trading partners. Interconnectivity has made it more important than ever for conflicts to be resolved as quickly and painlessly as possible. The less a conflict costs, both economically and socially, the better for everyone involved. One method to limit these costs is international mediation. International powers and organizations have increasingly been using mediation as a means to resolve a wide range of disputes. One individual who has become synonymous with these efforts is Jan Eliasson. -
Y O U T H F L A
YOUTHFLASH Youth at the United Nations www.un.org/youth October 2005 WELCOME to the UN Youth Flash, News from UN Headquarters a service of the UN Programme on Youth, keeping you up-to-date Youth in the spotlight at the United Nations on the youth agenda of the UN During the week of 3 to 7 October 2005, youth stood in the spotlight of and partnering youth organiza- the United Nations. On 6 October, the General Assembly devoted two tions around the world. We plenary meetings to review the achievements made in the implementa- encourage you to forward this tion of the World Programme of Action on Youth. Youth Flash to people in your network. Among the participants were a record number of 47 youth delegates representing 29 countries, some 150 representatives of youth organiza- tions, several Youth Ministers, and representatives of almost all UN Agencies. The meetings were opened the President of the General World Youth Report 2005, Assembly, Mr. Jan Eliasson of Sweden. Deputy Secretary-General, Ms Young people today and Louise Fréchette addressed the General Assembly and 22 youth dele- in 2015 gates spoke on behalf of their country. Following the statements, the Assembly adopted a resolution on youth. More info can be found at: On 4 October, the World Youth http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unyin/ga60.htm See also the feature in Report 2005 was launched. this Youth Flash. The report takes an in-depth look at the fifteen priority areas affecting young people that were identified by the General Assembly. It also provides a review of three relatively under- researched topics: young people in poverty; the emergence of a media-driven global youth cul- General Assembly adopts progressive resolution on youth ture; and gender dimensions of youth affected by armed conflict. -
The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania
The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania Prepared for the US Department of Defense’s Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance May 2020 Written by: Jonah Bhide Grace Frazor Charlotte Gorman Claire Huitt Christopher Zimmer Under the supervision of Dr. Joshua Busby 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 United States 8 Oceania 22 China 30 Australia 41 New Zealand 48 France 53 Japan 61 Policy Recommendations for US Government 66 3 Executive Summary Research Question The current strategic landscape in Oceania comprises a variety of complex and cross-cutting themes. The most salient of which is climate change and its impact on multilateral political networks, the security and resilience of governments, sustainable development, and geopolitical competition. These challenges pose both opportunities and threats to each regionally-invested government, including the United States — a power present in the region since the Second World War. This report sets out to answer the following questions: what are the current state of international affairs, complexities, risks, and potential opportunities regarding climate security issues and geostrategic competition in Oceania? And, what policy recommendations and approaches should the US government explore to improve its regional standing and secure its national interests? The report serves as a primer to explain and analyze the region’s state of affairs, and to discuss possible ways forward for the US government. Given that we conducted research from August 2019 through May 2020, the global health crisis caused by the novel coronavirus added additional challenges like cancelling fieldwork travel. However, the pandemic has factored into some of the analysis in this report to offer a first look at what new opportunities and perils the United States will face in this space. -
Keesep Starts Sunday, Right on Time
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2020 KEESEP STARTS SUNDAY, BREEDERS= CUP BACK TO KEENELAND IN 2022, PURSES MAINTAINED IN 2020 RIGHT ON TIME The Breeders= Cup will return to Keeneland Race Course in Lexington, Ky. as the host site for the 2022 Breeders= Cup World Championships, the Breeders= Cup announced Saturday. Keeneland, which is also scheduled to host this year=s World Championships Nov. 6-7, will hold the 39th Breeders= Cup Nov. 4-5, 2022. It will be the third time the Breeders= Cup has been held at Keeneland since 2015. Del Mar will remain the host of the 2021 event. The announcement of Keeneland as host of the 2022 championships was made in conjunction with two other pieces of news: first, attendance at this year=s event will be limited to the connections of race participants and essential staff, and without fans on-site, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Cont. p6 Keeneland sales grounds | Keeneland photo IN TDN EUROPE TODAY by Jessica Martini MAGICAL TAKES CHAMPION THRILLER LEXINGTON, KY - While the coronavirus pandemic wreaked Magical (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) turned the tables on Ghaiyyath havoc with sales across the globe from March through August, (Ire) (Dubawi {Ire}) to record back-to-back wins in the G1 Irish the calendar will return to some semblance of normalcy when Champion S. the Keeneland September Yearling Sale kicks off right on Click or tap here to go straight to TDN Europe. schedule in Lexington Sunday at noon. ASo many sales companies in the Northern Hemisphere have had to rearrange some things, but we have been very fortunate that the September sale is taking place in September at Keeneland,@ said Keeneland=s Director of Sales Operations Geoffrey Russell. -
The United Nations Human Rights Council: Background and Policy Issues
The United Nations Human Rights Council: Background and Policy Issues Luisa Blanchfield Specialist in International Relations Michael A. Weber Analyst in Foreign Affairs Updated April 20, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33608 SUMMARY RL33608 The United Nations Human Rights Council: April 20, 2020 Background and Policy Issues Luisa Blanchfield Over the years, many Members of Congress have demonstrated an ongoing interest in the role Specialist in International and effectiveness of the United Nations (U.N.) Human Rights Council (the Council). The Relations Council is the primary intergovernmental body mandated with addressing human rights on a [email protected] global level. The United States was a member of the Council for two three-year terms during the Michael A. Weber Obama Administration, and a third term during the first part of the Trump Administration. In Analyst in Foreign Affairs June 2018, the Trump Administration withdrew from the Council, noting concerns with the [email protected] Council’s focus on Israel, overall ineffectiveness in addressing human rights issues, and lack of reform. Some of the Council’s activities are suspended or being implemented remotely due to For a copy of the full report, concerns about COVID-19. please call 7-.... or visit www.crs.gov. Background The U.N. General Assembly established the Human Rights Council in 2006 to replace the Commission on Human Rights, which was criticized for its ineffectiveness in addressing human rights abuses and for the number of widely perceived human rights abusers that served as its members. Since 2006, many governments and observers have expressed serious concerns with the Council’s disproportionate attention to Israel and apparent lack of attention to other pressing human rights situations. -
The Levy Institute Generates Effective Public Policy Responses to Economic Problems That Profoundly Affect the Quality of Life in the United States and Abroad
Biennial Report 2004–2005 The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College was founded in 1986, through the generous support of Bard College Trustee Leon Levy, as a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public policy research organization. It is independent of any political or other affiliation and encourages diversity of opinion in the examination of economic issues. The purpose of all Levy Institute research and activities is to enable scholars and leaders in business, labor, and government to work together on problems of common interest. Levy Institute findings are disseminated—via publications, conferences, workshops, seminars, congressional testimony, and other activities—to an international audience of public officials, private sector executives, academics, and the general public. Through this process of scholarship, analysis, and informed debate, the Levy Institute generates effective public policy responses to economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. The Levy Institute’s main conference and research facility is Blithewood Manor, on the campus of Bard College, located 90 miles north of New York City. The Levy Institute is housed in Blithewood Manor at Bard College. 2 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT 4 NEW INITIATIVE 6 RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS : .. , : , - () : : : , , 26 CONFERENCES 36 THE LEVY INSTITUTE BOOK SERIES 37 BIOGRAPHIES OF INSTITUTE SCHOLARS 44 BOARD, ADMINISTRATION, AND RESEARCH STAFF MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT In the biennial reports of previous years, I described how the Levy Institute draws inspiration and guid- ance not only from its founders and scholars but from a world facing many new and daunting chal- lenges. Our efforts to redefine economics and public policy continue to attract notice and exert influ- ence, nationally and internationally. -
Towards the Third Cycle of the Upr: Stick Or Twist?
POLICY REPORT TOWARDS THE THIRD CYCLE OF THE UPR: STICK OR TWIST? Lessons learnt from the first ten years of the Universal Periodic Review Subhas Gujadhur and Marc Limon July 2016 PREFACE This report on the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism is the result of a two-year project led by Subhas Gujadhur and Marc Limon. It reflects primary and secondary desk research, data analysis covering reports and recommendations from the first two UPR cycles, three policy dialogues in Geneva and over fifty interviews with key policymakers, including State delegates, capital-based experts, NGOs, UN officials and academics. The authors would like to extend particular thanks to Nicholas Alexander for his help with the statistical analysis that underpins many of the key findings of this report. Notwithstanding, the analysis, conclusions and recommendations presented in the report are entirely the authors' own responsibility. Authors Subhas Gujadhur Marc Limon Research assistants Nicholas Alexander Giovanna Voltolina Courtney Tran © Universal Rights Group 2016 ISBN: 978-2-9700961-6-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Part I: Promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights 8 Part II: Lessons learnt from the UPR's first ten years 18 1. State reporting 22 2. Peer review in the UPR Working Group 23 3. Adoption of the review outcome 35 4. Implementation of accepted recommendations 35 5. Implementation: structures, reporting, patterns 39 Recommendations 42 _ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW hoped for). States also agreed that the Council would ‘undertake a universal periodic review, based on objective and reliable infor- In 2005, Heads of State meeting at the UN’s World Summit re- mation, of the fulfilment by each State of its human rights obliga- solved to create the Human Rights Council (the Council) to re- tions and commitments in a manner which ensures universality place the Commission on Human Rights (the Commission). -
LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years.