Interim Report Q2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report | 2018
Annual Report | 2018 A word from the CEO | This is Norconsult | Strategy 2019–2021 | Heads for tomorrow | Selected projects 2018 | Our market areas | Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 | Consolidated financial statements 5 326 Turnover (NOK, millions) Contents 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 A word from the CEO . 4 1 000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 This is Norconsult Our business . 7 Corporate governance . 10 402 Strategy 2019–2021 . 12 Operating profit (NOK, millions) Heads for tomorrow #headsforrecruitment . 16 400 #headsforcareer . 18 #headsforsustainability . 21 300 #headsforresponsibility . 22 #headsforenvironment . 25 200 The little big differences 100 Selected projects 2018 . 28 Our market areas . 38 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 . 46 Consolidated financial statements . 62 3 800 Forretningsidé Employees 2018 3 800 2017 3 200 2016 3 050 2015 2 970 2014 2 900 Front page photos Photo 1: Havøygavlen Wind Power Plant . Photo 2: City Bridge in Flekkefjord . Photo: Southern Region of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration 2 Photo 3: Norconsult’s employees working at the VEAS facility . Photo: Johnny Syversen 3 A word from the CEO | This is Norconsult | Strategy 2019–2021 | Heads for tomorrow | Selected projects 2018 | Our market areas | Board of Directors’ Report for 2018 | Consolidated financial statements As “Norconsultants”, everything we do must contribute to little big differences A word from the CEO that create added value for our clients. Photo: Erik Burås 2018 was a hectic and good year for the acquisition of Arkitekthuset joint Ringerike Railway Line and E16 In addition, we have been selected as main topics for the 2019–2021 strategy must sharpen our ability to be in the Norconsult . -
Railway Power Supply System Models for Static Calculations in a Modular Design Implementation
Railway power supply system models for static calculations in a modular design implementation Usability illustrated by case-studies of northern Malmbanan RONNY SKOGBERG Master’s Degree Project Stockholm, Sweden 2013 XR-EE-ES 2013:006 Railway power supply system models for static calculations in a modular design implementation Usability illustrated by case-studies of northern Malmbanan RONNY SKOGBERG Master of Science Thesis Royal Institute of Technology School of Electrical Engineering Electric Power Systems Stockholm, Sweden, 2013 Supervisors: Lars Abrahamsson, KTH Mario Lagos, Transrail AB Examiner: Lennart Söder XR-EE-ES 2013:006 Abstract Several previous theses and reports have shown that voltage variations, and other types of supply changes, can influence the performance and movements of trains. As part of a modular software package for railway focused calculations, the need to take into account for the electrical behavior of the system was needed, to be used for both planning and operational uses. In this thesis, different static models are presented and used for train related power flow calculations. A previous model used for converter stations is also extended to handle different configurations of multiple converters. A special interest in the train type IORE, which is used for iron ore transports along Malmbanan, and the power systems influence to its performance, as available modules, for mechanical calculations, in the software uses the same train type. A part of this project was to examine changes in the power systems performance if the control of the train converters were changed, both during motoring and regenerative braking. A proposed node model, for the static parts of a railway power system, has been used to simplify the building of the power system model and implementation of the simulation environment. -
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic ......................................................................................................... -
Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies
Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76 -
Representing the SPANISH RAILWAY INDUSTRY
Mafex corporate magazine Spanish Railway Association Issue 20. September 2019 MAFEX Anniversary years representing the SPANISH RAILWAY INDUSTRY SPECIAL INNOVATION DESTINATION Special feature on the Mafex 7th Mafex will spearhead the European Nordic countries invest in railway International Railway Convention. Project entitled H2020 RailActivation. innovation. IN DEPT MAFEX ◗ Table of Contents MAFEX 15TH ANNIVERSARY / EDITORIAL Mafex reaches 15 years of intense 05 activity as a benchmark association for an innovative, cutting-edge industry 06 / MAFEX INFORMS with an increasingly marked presence ANNUAL PARTNERS’ MEETING: throughout the world. MAFEX EXPANDS THE NUMBER OF ASSOCIATES AND BOLSTERS ITS BALANCE APPRAISAL OF THE 7TH ACTIVITIES FOR 2019 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY CONVENTION The Association informed the Annual Once again, the industry welcomed this Partners’ Meeting of the progress made biennial event in a very positive manner in the previous year, the incorporation which brought together delegates from 30 of new companies and the evolution of countries and more than 120 senior official activities for the 2019-2020 timeframe. from Spanish companies and bodies. MEMBERS NEWS MAFEX UNVEILS THE 26 / RAILACTIVACTION PROJECT The RailActivation project was unveiled at the Kick-Off Meeting of the 38 / DESTINATION European Commission. SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES Denmark, Norway and Sweden have MAFEX PARTICIPTES IN THE investment plans underway to modernise ENTREPRENEURIAL ENCOUNTER the railway network and digitise services. With the Minister of Infrastructure The three countries advance towards an Development of the United Arab innovative transport model. Emirates, Abdullah Belhaif Alnuami held in the office of CEOE. 61 / INTERVIEW Jan Schneider-Tilli, AGREEMENT BETWEEN BCIE AND Programme Director of Banedanmark. MAFEX To promote and support internationalisation in the Spanish railway sector. -
Railway Standard
Railway standard Possible extension of the ScanMed Corridor from the Mälardalen Task 5.3 Catching the goods transport from the northern areas to CNCs’ Responsible partner: Region Örebro County Version: Final draft, 2017-12-14 Lead Partner Content List of figures ........................................................................................................................................ 3 List of tables ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 TENTacle ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Present situation .................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... -
Interim Report Q2
2015 INTERIM REPORT Q2 Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (publ) Corp. ID no. 556001-5835 Financial information from LKAB is available in Swedish and English and can be obtained from: LKAB Communications, Box 952, SE–971 28 Luleå, Sweden. Tel +46 (0)771 76 00 00, Fax +46 (0)771 76 00 01. Financial information is also available on lkab.com APRIL – june JANUARy – june • NET salES TOTALLED MSEK 3,567 (4,957). • NET salES TOTALLED MSEK 7,745 (10,963). • OPERATING LOSS was MSEK -228 (-417). • OPERATING PROFIT was MSEK 147 (1,530). • OPERATING PROFIT BEFORE COSTS FOR URbaN • OPERATING PROFIT BEFORE COSTS FOR URbaN TRANSFORMATION PROVISIONS was MSEK 23 (859). TRANSFORMATION PROVISIONS was MSEK 622 (2,883). • LOSS BEFORE TAX TOTALLED MSEK -548 (-319). • PROFIT BEFORE TAX TOTALLED MSEK 188 (1,707). • LOSS FOR THE PERIOD was MSEK -416 (-247). • PROFIT FOR THE PERIOD was MSEK 190 (1,343). • OPERATING CASH FLOW was MSEK -1,488 (643). • OPERATING CASH FLOW was MSEK -1,195 (2,764). • DELIVERIES OF IRON ORE TOTALLED 5.3 (6.0) MT. • DELIVERIES OF IRON ORE TOTALLED 11.2 (12.6) MT. NET SALES AND OPERATING PROFIT COMMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT AND CEO Net sales Q2 2015 Net sales Operating profit MSEK COSTS IN FOCUS AS PRICE 8000 7000 PRESSURE CONTINUES IN THE 6000 MARKET 5000 4000 3000 Low iron ore prices and fewer deliveries planned to begin as early as the summer of 2015. 2000 are putting pressure on LKAB’s profitability. Full production should be reached in Q2 2016 as 1000 Meanwhile, efforts to reduce costs are having previously announced. -
A European Standard for Rail Fastenings for Heavy Axle Loads
A European Standard for Rail Fastenings for Heavy Axle Loads. David Rhodes, Technical Director, Pandrol Ltd., Station Road, Addlestone, KT15 2AR, UK (Convenor of CEN Working Group TC256/WG17) Presented at the International Heavy Haul Association Special Technical Session, Kiruna, Sweden, June 2007 Summary: This paper describes the development of European standard EN13481-8, which sets out the performance requirements for rail fastenings which are to be used on tracks carrying trains with heavy axle loads i.e. axle loads greater than 260kN. The standard takes particular account of proposals to run such trains on track aligned for faster lighter trains. The critical loading case arises when heavy freight trains travel at low speeds on curves for which the super-elevation and rail pad resilience have been selected to suit fast passenger trains. Index terms: Rail fastenings, Heavy Haul tracks, assuming typical axle loads of up to 22.5 tonnes 1. NOTATION AND UNITS and maximum axle loads of 26 tonnes, on the basis of a minimum curve radius of 150 metres (or 400 metres where very resilient rail pads were used). α Angle of applied load (deg) M Moment about centre of rail seat (kNm) 3. THE EUROPEAN HEAVY AXLE LOAD CASE P Maximum Load Applied (kN) PL Lateral component of P (kN) At about the time that the technical work on the rail PV Vertical component of P (kN) fastenings standards was completed, discussions were X Position of load application taking place about the possible introduction of freight below centre of gauge corner trains with heavier axle loads in several European radius (mm) countries, most notably in Great Britain, Finland and Sweden. -
LKAB 2019 Annual and Sustainability Report
2019 ANNUAL AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT LKAB aims to create prosperity by being one of the most innovative, resource-efficient and responsible mining and minerals companies in the world. 02 LKAB ANNUAL AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION RESPONSIBILITY AND GOVERNANCE The year in brief 2 Sustainable enterprise 50 Comments by the President and CEO 4 Risks and risk management 51 How we create value 8 Comments by the Chairman of the Board 58 Objectives for sustainable development 10 Corporate governance report 59 Board of Directors 66 BUSINESS CONTEXT AND STRATEGY Executive management team 68 Global context 13 Strategic priorities 16 FINANCIAL RESULTS Group overview 70 PRODUCTS AND MARKETS Financial statements 73 Customer offering 21 Notes 83 Drivers and trends 22 The Board’s attestation 121 Market development 24 Auditor’s report 122 OPERATIONS SUSTAINABILITY NOTES Exploration 27 Notes to the sustainability report 126 Mining 31 Auditor’s Limited Assurance Report Processing 33 on the Sustainability Report 144 Transport 34 OTHER INFORMATION Suppliers 35 Mineral reserves and mineral resources 146 Employees 36 Ten-year overview 150 Social responsibility 40 Terms and definitions 151 Environmental responsibility 44 Annual General Meeting and financial information 153 Impact in the value chain 48 Addresses lkab.com Administration report pages 2–3, 8–14, 35–72 and 121. Sustainability report pages 8–14, 35–41, 44–47, 50–56 and 125–143. RAIL TRANSPORT PORTS ABOUT LKAB’S ANNUAL AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019 The Board of Directors and the President hereby submit the annual and sustainability report for Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (publ), corporate identity number 556001-5835, for the calendar year 2019. -
Høringsliste Jernbane Virksomhet Adresse Postnr/Sted E-Post Org
Høringsliste jernbane Virksomhet Adresse Postnr/Sted E-post Org. nummer Arbeidstilsynet Postboks 4720 Torgarden 7468 TRONDHEIM [email protected] 974761211 Bane NOR SF Postboks 4350 2308 HAMAR [email protected] 917082308 Bergens Elektriske Sporvei Postboks 812 Sentrum 5807 BERGEN [email protected] 990512469 Boreal Bane AS Postboks 3448 Havstad 7425 TRONDHEIM [email protected] 954653137 Borregaard AS Postboks 162 1701 SARPSBORG [email protected] 895623032 Bybanen AS Kokstadflaten 59 5257 KOKSTAD [email protected] 977511402 CargoNet AS Postboks 1800 Sentrum 0048 OSLO [email protected] 983606598 Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap (DSB) Postboks 2014 3103 TØNSBERG [email protected] 974760983 Etterretningstjenesten Postboks 193 Alnabru bedriftssenter 0614 OSLO 974789221 Flytoget AS Postboks 19 Sentrum 0101 OSLO [email protected] 965694404 Go-Ahead Norge AS v/Yngve Kloster Jernbanetorget 1 0154 OSLO [email protected] 917132577 Green Cargo AB Box 39 17111 Solna, Sverige [email protected] Grenland Rail AS Bølevegen 202 3713 SKIEN [email protected] 988703680 Hector Rail AB Svärdvägen 27 18233 DANDERYD [email protected] Hellik Teigen AS Postboks 2 3301 HOKKSUND [email protected] 941538576 Jernbanedirektoratet Postboks 16 Sentrum 0101 OSLO [email protected] 916810962 Jernbanevirksomhetenes sikkerhetsforening Postboks 7052 Majorstuen 0306 OSLO [email protected] 818315392 Keolis Norge AS Kokstad depot, Kokstadflaten 59 5257 KOKSTAD [email protected] 993050377 LKAB Malmtrafik AB 98186 -
Railml2.4Nor Documentation
railML2.4nor Documentation Subschema Timetable Version: 1.0 Date: 03.07.2020 Content Summary The following documents the railML2.4nor Timetable schema, especially the Norwegian specialties and resulting extensions to railML2.4. It contains information about the application of railML2.4nor Timetable, general modelling rules and an example with corresponding railML2.4nor source code. railML2.4nor IS Documentation 2 General Information Content 1 General Information ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is railML2.4nor....................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Why do we need railML2.4nor? ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 What do we use railML2.4nor Timetable for? ............................................................................... 6 1.4 Reader information ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Syntax guide .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Versioning of railML2.4nor TT documentation .............................................................................. 7 2 railML2.4nor TT content on element level ................................................................................................ -
Annex to 3Rd IRG-Rail Market Monitoring Report
IRG-Rail (15) 02a_rev1 Independent Regulators’ Group – Rail IRG–Rail Annexes to the 3rd IRG-Rail Annual Market Monitoring Report March 2015 IRG-Rail Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report Index 1. Country sheets market structure.................................................................................2 2. Common list of definitions and indicators ...............................................................299 3. Graphs and tables not used in the report................................................................322 1 IRG-Rail Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report 1. Country sheets market structure Regulatory Authority: Schienen-Control GmbH Country: Austria Date of legal liberalisation of : Freight railway market: 9 January 1998. Passenger railway market: 9 January 1998. Date of entry of first new entrant into market: Freight: 1 April 2001. Passenger: 14 December 2003. Ownership structure Freight RCA: 100% public Lokomotion: 30% DB Schenker, 70% various institutions with public ownership LTE: 100% public (was 50% private, new partner to be announced May 2015) Cargoserv, Ecco-Rail, RTS: 100% private TXL: 100% public (Trenitalia) Raaberbahn Cargo: 93.8% public SLB, STB, GKB, MBS, WLC: 100% public RPA: 53% private, 47% public (City of Hamburg: 68% HHLA, HHLA: 85% Metrans, Metrans: 80% RPA) Passenger ÖBB PV 100% public WLB, GKB, StLB, MBS, StH, SLB: 100% public CAT: 49.9% ÖBB PV, 50.1% Vienna Airport (public majority) WESTbahn: 74% private, 26% public (SNCF Voyageurs) Main developments Rail freight traffic once again receded slightly in 2013 on the previous year. The new entrants could raise their market share in traffic frequency (tons) from 23.2 to 24.9 percent, and their share in transport performance (net tons per kilometre) rose from 17.6 to 19.3 percent.