50 Years of Interstate Structures Past, Present, and Future TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

50 Years of Interstate Structures Past, Present, and Future TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C104 September 2006 50 Years of Interstate Structures Past, Present, and Future TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael D. Meyer, Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Vice Chair: Linda S. Watson, Executive Director, LYNX–Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority, Orlando Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2006 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, State Highway Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Christopher P. L. Barkan, Associate Professor and Director, Railroad Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Rail Group Chair Shelly R. Brown, Principal, Shelly Brown Associates, Seattle, Washington, Legal Resources Group Chair Christina S. Casgar, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Office of Intermodalism, Washington, D.C., Freight Systems Group Chair James M. Crites, Executive Vice President, Operations, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, Aviation Group Chair Arlene L. Dietz, C&A Dietz, LLC, Salem, Oregon, Marine Group Chair Robert C. Johns, Director, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Policy and Organization Group Chair Patricia V. McLaughlin, Principal, Moore Iacofano Golstman, Inc., Pasadena, California, Public Transportation Group Chair Marcy S. Schwartz, Senior Vice President, CH2M HILL, Portland, Oregon, Planning and Environment Group Chair Leland D. Smithson, AASHTO SICOP Coordinator, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Operations and Maintenance Group Chair L. David Suits, Executive Director, North American Geosynthetics Society, Albany, New York, Design and Construction Group Chair Barry M. Sweedler, Partner, Safety & Policy Analysis International, Lafayette, California, System Users Group Chair TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CIRCULAR E-C104 Fifty Years of Interstate Structures Past, Present, and Future Transportation Research Board Structures Section September 2006 Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 www.TRB.org TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CIRCULAR E-C104 ISSN 0097-8515 The Transportation Research Board is a division of the National Research Council, which serves as an independent adviser to the federal government on scientific and technical questions of national importance. The National Research Council, jointly administered by the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine, brings the resources of the entire scientific and technical communities to bear on national problems through its volunteer advisory committees. The Transportation Research Board is distributing this Circular to make the information contained herein available for use by individual practitioners in state and local transportation agencies, researchers in academic institutions, and other members of the transportation research community. The information in this Circular was taken directly from the submission of the authors. This document is not a report of the National Research Council or of the National Academy of Sciences. Design and Construction Group L. David Suits, Chair Structures Section Mary Lou Ralls, Chair Alfred H. Brand, Chair, Tunnels and Underground Structures Committee Ian George Buckle, Chair, Seismic Design of Bridges Committee Harry Allen Capers, Jr., Chair, General Structures Committee Barney T. Martin, Jr., Chair, Concrete Bridges Committee Timothy J. McGrath, Chair, Culverts and Hydraulic Structures Committee Mark L. Reno, Chair, Steel Bridges Committee Mohsen A. Shahawy, Chair, Structural Fiber-Reinforced Plastics Committee Richard A. Walther, Chair, Dynamics and Field Testing of Bridges Committee Stephen F. Maher, TRB Engineer of Design Michael DeCarmine, Senior Program Associate Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 www.TRB.org Jennifer Correro, Proofreader and Layout Foreword he 50th Anniversary of the Interstate Highway System marks a milestone for one of T the largest public works projects ever undertaken in the United States—and perhaps in the world. This Circular documents some of the key legislation, specifications development, and advances in research, design, and construction for bridges and other highway structures since the signing of the Federal Highway Act of 1956. The eight papers in this Circular were sponsored by the Structures Section (AFF00) committees: General Structures (AFF10); Steel Bridges (AFF20); Concrete Bridges (AFF30); Dynamics and Field Testing of Bridges (AFF40); Seismic Design of Bridges (AFF50); Tunnels and Underground Structures (AFF60); Culverts and Hydraulic Structures (AFF70); and Structural Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (AFF80). Advancements have been made possible through research, empirical knowledge gained during construction, and hindsight gleaned from failures. The papers also look forward to the future, commenting on the challenges ahead, including possible solutions to accommodate the nation’s ever increasing vehicle loads and numbers. There are numerous possible techniques, methods, and materials on the horizon that may help to manage these challenges. The eight papers were presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) during January 2006 in Washington. D.C. They were presented in two successive podium sessions titled “50 Years of Interstate Structures: Successes and Future Developments (Parts 1 and 2).” Immediately following the podium sessions, a brief poster session was held; audience members and other interested persons were able to interact with the authors. The chairs of the TRB Structures Section coordinated the preparation, conducted peer reviews, and some even coauthored the papers presented in this Circular. Great appreciation and thanks are due for their fine leadership throughout this effort. All of the authors made major contributions of time and effort, and without their significant knowledge and dedication, the podium sessions, poster session, and Circular could not have been possible. We thank the chairs and authors for their invaluable service to the industry. Finally, heartfelt thanks are extended to TRB Engineer of Design Stephen Maher for his dedication and continued support and assistance that made this special project possible. —Mary Lou Ralls Newman Chair TRB Structures Section i Contents Evolution of Vehicular Live Load Models During the Interstate Design Era and Beyond ....1 John M. Kulicki and Dennis R. Mertz Steel Bridges in the United States: Past, Present, and Future.................................................27 John Fisher, Dann Hall, Ray McCabe, Ken Price, Chuck Seim, and Stan Woods The Interstate Highway System and the Development of Prestressed Concrete Bridges.....49 Shri Bhide, Michael Culmo, John Ma, Barney Martin, and Henry Russell Condition Assessment of Highway Structures: Past, Present, and Future ............................67 Richard A. Walther and Steven B. Chase Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges Using Load and Resistance Factor Design: Past, Present, and Future............................................................................................................79 Ian G. Buckle, Wen-Huei Phillip Yen, and James E. Roberts 50 Years of Tunnels on the Interstate Highway System...........................................................96 Lee W. Abramson Culverts: Hidden Structures, Critical Infrastructure Elements ...........................................109 Timothy J. McGrath, Josiah Beakley, Dan Edwards, Mike Pluimer, and Robert P. Walker Fiber-Reinforced Polymers for Transportation and Civil Engineering Infrastructure: Reality and Vision............................................................121 S. Rizkalla, M. Dawood, and M. Shahawy ii GENERAL STRUCTURES COMMITTEE Evolution of Vehicular Live Load Models During the Interstate Design Era and Beyond JOHN M. KULICKI Modjeski and Masters, Inc. DENNIS R. MERTZ University of Delaware his paper reviews the evolution of live load design models for bridges and associated design T specification provisions before, during and after the Interstate era, taken as the last 80 years. The types of vehicles on the roads are evaluated and comparisons are made to force effects generated by standard AASHTO design loadings. The introduction of the Federal Bridge Formula is reviewed and a comparison is made to the standard AASHTO HS20 design vehicle used throughout most of the Interstate period. The change in legal loads as well as extra legal loads are reviewed and the implication of the exclusion to the legal load limit made in various states are reviewed and compared to the HS20 loading. The basis for periodic changes to the live load design models, load distribution, and impact is also reviewed. Finally, a brief summary of the development of the post-interstate era live load model, the HL93 loading in the AASHTO LRFD Specifications, is also presented. INTRODUCTION Various editions of the AASHTO (or AASHO) Standard Specification for Highway Bridge Design (1) will be referred to herein as the “Standard Specifications.” Likewise, various editions of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2) will be referred to
Recommended publications
  • Appendix O (PDF)
    APPENDIX P FIRE RESPONSE HAZMAT BOX INCIDENT CODE INCIDENT DATE LOCATION NUMBER FIRE COMPANY DESCRIPTION WATERSHED 001787 M 09‐001 01/05/2009 GEORGE STREET AND ARCHER STREET 0304 03 BODY FLUID CLEAN UP WINTERS RUN 003176 I 09‐002 01/08/2009 MEADOW ROAD ‐ 211 0354 03 INVESTIGATION OF CHEMICAL SMELL IN AREA WINTERS RUN 001749 C 09‐003 01/05/2009 CONSTANT FRIENDSHIP BOULEVARD ‐ 413 0403 04 MIXTURE OF CHEMICALS IN DUMPSTER, VAPOR CLOUD EVIDENT WINTERS RUN 001949 I 09‐004 01/05/2009 LAURENTUM PARKWAY ‐ 1 0409 04 INVESTIGATION OF BOILER DESCALER SPILL ON 12/31/08 BYNUM RUN 005883 I 09‐005 01/12/2009 BROADWAY ‐ 202 0341 03 SMALL FUEL OIL SPILL AT LOCATION BYNUM RUN 009088 I 09‐006 01/17/2009 HOPPERS LANE ‐ 625 0501 05 NOTIFICATION OF HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS MIXED WITH INJURY LOWER SUSQUEHANNA D09‐007 01/17/2009 CITY OF HAVRE DE GRACE 0500 05 STANDBY FOR PRESIDENTIAL SECURITY EVENT LOWER SUSQUEHANNA 008979 C 09‐008 01/17/2009 HARDEES DRIVE ‐ 1100 0215 02 FUEL SPILL FROM TRACTOR TRAILER SWAN CREEK 009857 M 09‐009 0101/19/2009/19/2009 CANDLEWOOD DRIVE0806 08 BODY FLUID CLEAN UP WINTERS RUN 009550 I 09‐010 01/18/2009 BEL AIR PIKE ‐ 615 0304 03 INVESTIGATION OF CONTAINER OF MERCURY FOUND IN LOCKER WINTERS RUN 013648 I 09‐011 01/27/2009 BEL AIR ROAD ‐ 1510 0343 03 INVESTIGATION OF HIGH CO LEVELS IN BUILDING WINTERS RUN 012609 I 09‐012 01/24/2009 ROBIN CIRCLE ‐ 1608 0312 03 PAINT SPILL ON ROADWAY BYNUM RUN 014664 C 09‐013 01/28/2009 I‐95 SB MM 87.5 0195 01 FUEL SPILL AND PUMP OFF OF TRACTOR TRAILER SWAN CREEK 015665 C 09‐014 01/30/2009 I‐95 NB MM 90.5
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701
    Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701 TABLE TO § 100.501—ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 100.501 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983—Continued No. Date Event Sponsor Location 68 .. June 25 and 26, Thunder on the Kent Narrows All waters of Prospect Bay enclosed by the following points: 2011. Narrows. Racing Asso- Latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W., to lati- ciation. tude 38°58′02.0″ N., longitude 076°15′05.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′38.0″ N., longitude 076°15′29.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′28.0″ N., longitude 076°15′23.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W. [USCG–2007–0147, 73 FR 26009, May 8, 2008, as forbid and control the movement of all amended by USCG–2009–0430, 74 FR 30223, vessels in the regulated area(s). When June 25, 2009; 75 FR 750, Jan. 6, 2010; USCG– hailed or signaled by an official patrol 2011–0368, 76 FR 26605, May 9, 2011] vessel, a vessel in these areas shall im- EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: By USCG–2010–1094, mediately comply with the directions at 76 FR 13886, Mar. 15, 2011, the Table to given. Failure to do so may result in § 100.501 was amended by suspending lines No. expulsion from the area, citation for 13, No. 19, No. 21 and No. 23, and adding a new failure to comply, or both. heading and entries 65, 66, 67, and 68, effec- tive Apr. 1, 2011 through Sept. 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No
    RESOLUTION NO. 1154-20 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2019 HARFORD COUNTY ANNUAL GROWTH REPORT WHEREAS, Chapter 759 of the Laws of Maryland: the Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Smart Growth Areas Act of 1997 require municipalities to adopt County standards related to adequate public facilities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, the Development Regulation, Article II, Section 165-21 Annual Growth Report outlines the procedures for complying with the County Adequate Public Facilities requirements for schools; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, requires submittal of the Harford County Growth Report to the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners for acceptance at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, in June, 2020, the Harford County Department of Planning and Zoning submitted the Annual Growth Report attached hereto, indicating that the utilization rates of some public schools serving the Town of Bel Air exceed 110% of rated capacity; and WHEREAS, Homestead-Wakefield Elementary School (currently 112%), Red Pump Elementary School (113% in 2021), Bel Air Elementary School (113% in 2020) and Bel Air Middle School (currently 115%) are projected to be over capacity within the next three years. However, because all of these attendance areas abut schools that are identified as under capacity, no restrictions are mandated by code. All other school service areas will not be affected by adequacy standards established by the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners that the 2019 Harford County Annual Growth Report attached hereto, shall be officially accepted and shall provide the basis for review and approval of residential development per Section 165-21 of the Town of Bel Air Development Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sceniccorridorbroch-Outside (From Pdf)
    Our Story The Florida Keys Scenic Highway (FKSH) corridor runs from Mile Marker 110, north of the spectacular Jewfish Creek Bridge, to Mile Marker 0 in Old Town Key West. The scenic highway corridor also extends five miles on each side of the highway. So, the FKSH truly encompasses all of the Florida Keys, its natural wonders, and its communities. Through efforts beginning in 1996 with numerous public meetings and workshops to create the Corridor Management Plan, the FDOT designated the FKSH a Florida Scenic Highway in 2001. In 2007, the Florida Keys Mission Statement Scenic Corridor Alliance (FKSCA) was To enhance the scenic image, preserve our established as the corridor management entity heritage and diversity, and promote the natural responsible for implementing the goals and beauty of the Florida Keys Scenic Corridor. objectives concerning the FKSH. The FKSCA completed its Corridor Management Plan Five- Year Update in fall of 2008 and applied for designation in the National Scenic Byways Program. The FKSCA proved our highway corridor meets the designation criteria of being considered a “destination unto itself” and “providing an exceptional travel experience.” Our scenic and recreational intrinsic qualities “are those which best represent the nation, are nationally recognized, and contain one-of-a- kind features that do not exist elsewhere.” The Florida Keys Scenic Highway is a natural fit. In October 2009, the Federal Highway Administration designated the Florida Keys Scenic Highway as an All-American Road – Florida Keys Scenic Corridor Alliance the highest status in the National Scenic P.O. Box 501930 Byways System. Marathon, FL 33050-1930 www.ScenicHighwayFlKeys.com GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF INTEREST City of Key West Key West City Limits to 7 Mile Bridge ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP What We Do 7 Mile Bridge to Long Key Bridge The Florida Keys Scenic Corridor Alliance (FKSCA) Individual $25 is the Corridor Management Entity for the Florida Long Key Bridge to Tavernier Creek Keys Scenic Highway (FKSH).
    [Show full text]
  • Fkeys-CMP.Pdf
    Florida KEYS Scenic Highway corridor management plan Submitted to Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Scenic Highways Coordinator 602 South Miami Avenue Miami, FL 33130 Submitted by The Florida Keys Scenic Highway CAG June Helbling and Kathy Toribio, Co-Chairs c/o Clean Florida Keys, Inc. PO Box 1528 Key West, FL 33041-1528 Prepared by The Florida Keys Scenic Highway CAG Peggy Fowler, Planning Consultant Patricia Fontova, Graphic Designer Carter and Burgess, Inc., Planning Consultants May, 2001 This document was prepared in part with funding from the Florida Department of Transportation. This document is formatted for 2-sided printing. Some pages were left intentionally blank for that reason. Table of Contents Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION .....................................................1 Chapter 2: CORRIDOR VISION ..................................................5 Chapter 3: CORRIDOR STORY ..................................................7 Chapter 4: DESIGNATION CRITERIA .......................................13 Chapter 5: BACKGROUND CONDITONS ANALYSIS ...............27 Chapter 6: RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN .......59 Chapter 7: PROTECTION TECHNIQUES................................ .63 Chapter 8: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ..............................69 Chapter 9: PARTNERSHIPS AND AGREEMENTS.................... .79 Chapter 10: FUNDING AND PROMOTION ...............................85 Chapter 11: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES ................93 Chapter 12: ACTION PLAN .........................................................97
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Annual Operating & Capital Budget Summary
    YEAR FISCAL 2021 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET SUMMARY MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Monroe County Florida Fiscal Year 2021 Adopted Annual Operating & Capital Budget Board of County Commissioners Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Roman Gastesi County Administrator and Chief Budget Officer Tina Boan Sr. Director of Budget & Finance Christina Brickell, Budget Administrator Krista Ramstad, Sr. Budget Analyst 1 Table of Contents Adopted Monroe County Organizational Chart ........................................................................................... i Introduction to County Budgeting ............................................................................................................... 1 Fund Structure .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Fund Description ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Fund/Departmental Relationship ............................................................................................................. 5 FY 2021 Adopted Revenue Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 6 FY 2021 Adopted Fund Summary ................................................................................................................ 8 FY 2021 Adopted Fiscal Plan .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 9.44 Monroe County
    January 30, 2020 9.44 MONROE COUNTY 9.44.1 SYSTEM SUMMARY Monroe County has a VIPER 4.1, 9-1-1 system consisting of 2 Primary PSAPs, one Secondary PSAP and one Backup PSAP. Each Primary PSAP is a PS/ALI system receiving calls from a specified portion of the Florida Keys. These are as follows: 9.44.1.1 SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT-KEY VACA PRIMARY PSAP Services the Upper Florida Keys from the Dade County line South to the Long Key Bridge, including the City of Layton and the Middle Florida Keys from the Long Key Bridge west to the Seven Mile Bridge, including the City of Key Colony, lower Florida Keys, from the Seven Mile Bridge to and including Stock Island and all of unincorporated Monroe County and is located at 2967 Overseas Hwy., Marathon, Florida, 33050. All law enforcement, EM’S and fire call are direct dispatcher. 9.44.1.2 MONROE COUNTY-KEY WEST POLICE DEPT-KEY WEST PRIMARY PSAP Services the City of Key West. It is serviced by a Primary PSAP located at the Key West Police Department’s primary location at 1604 North Roosevelt Blvd, Key West, Fl, 33040. Direct dispatch of law enforcement, EMS, and fire emergency vehicles are accomplished at this center. 9.44.1.3 MONROE COUNTY-OCEAN REEF SECONDARY PSAP Services the Ocean Reef Resort Community. Calls requiring EMS or fire services within the Ocean Reef Resort are transferred or relayed to the Ocean Reef Public Safety Dispatch Center. 9.44.1.4 MONROE COUNTY- SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT-KEY VACA BACKUP PSAP Services the Upper Florida Keys from the Dade County line South to the Long Key Bridge, including the City of Layton and the Middle Florida Keys from the Long Key Bridge west to the Seven Mile Bridge, including the City of Key Colony, lower Florida Keys, from the Seven Mile Bridge to and including Stock Island and all of unincorporated Monroe County and is located at 2798 Overseas Hwy., Marathon, Florida, 33050.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Agenda Monroe County
    FDOT District Six Work Program 2013 Public Hearing Agenda Monroe County 6:00 – 6:30 p.m. Welcome & Introduction Projects Overview (Please visit the following project tables to speak with FDOT project managers) • North Roosevelt Boulevard from Eisenhower Drive to US 1 in Key West • Bahia Honda Channel Bridge Repair • Long Key Bridge Repair/Rehabilitation • Overseas Highway - MM 77 to MM 81.43 • Overseas Highway in Key Largo (Construction Projects) between mile markers 90.74 and 97 Note: the following project overview videos for Monroe County and Miami- Dade County projects are also available online at fdotmonroe.com/work- program Miami-Dade County Projects • NW 36 Street Bridge from LeJeune Road to Okeechobee Road Bridge Replacement Project • NW 47 Avenue from Miami Gardens Drive to Premier Parkway • NW 57 Avenue Reconstruction (Daniel Iglesias) • Collins Avenue from Bayview Drive to 192 Street • Alton Road • Krome Avenue • W Flagler Street/SW 1 Street Final Design • Collins Avenue from 5 Street to Lincoln Road • NW 7 Avenue from NW 8 Street to NW 36 Street • Miami Intermodal Center • Port of Miami Tunnel • Golden Glades Interchange from SR 826/Palmetto Expressway Eastbound to I-95 Northbound • SR 826/Palmetto Expressway from I-75 to Golden Glades Interchange • SR 826/Palmetto Express Lanes • SR 826 & SR 836 Interchange Reconstruction • NW 25 Street Viaduct • SR 836/I-395 from west of I-95 to the MacArthur Causeway Bridge 6:30 – 6:50 p.m. 2014/15 – 2018/19 Work Program Overview Presentation & FDOT Pipeline Video Presenter, Harold Desdunes, P.E. Director of Transportation Development 6:50 – 7:50 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — a Review and Perspective
    Special Report Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — A Review and Perspective by Alan J. Moreton, P.E. State Structures Engineer Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, Florida 36 SYNOPSIS This paper offers an overview of the precast concrete segmental bridges designed and built in the state of Florida during the last ten years. The article summarizes various statistical structural parameters, segment manufacturing and erection methods, construction times, costs, and reviews problems typically encountered. Also included is a discussion of current industry and nationwide design and construction practices and some suggestions for possible improvements. CONTENTS Synopsis............................................37 1. Introduction ......................................38 2. Precast Segmental Bridges ........................38 3. Florida's Segmental Bridges .......................44 4. Structural Parametrics .............................44 5. Casting Yard Operations ...........................48 6. Rejected Segments .............................. 49 7. Erection Operations ...............................50 8. Some Typical Problems ...........................52 9. Time ............................................55 10. Costs ...........................................57 11. Administration Processes — Design, Construction andShop Drawings ...............................60 12. Actions by the Florida Department of Transportation ...63 13. Benefits of Segmental Bridges ......................64 14. Summary ........................................65
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Gets New Life With
    Need A Loan? Call Us ! 305-296-8535 KeysBank.com Ani Brian Kurt Brian Lori Madruga Barroso Lewin Kelly Bailey (305) (305) (305) (305) (305) 308-3210 393-4669 304-4187 393-6446 304-6991 NMLS#: 812674 NMLS#: 812460 NMLS#: 812476 NMLS#: 812475 NMLS#: 812459 Member FDICMember Equal Housing Lender WWW.KEYSNET.COM WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 16, 2013 VOLUME 60, NO. 5 ● 25 CENTS UPPER KEYS Aquarius gets new life with FIU By KEVIN WADLOW World’s only underwater research world,” said Mike Heithaus, Senior Staff Writer executive director of FIU’s [email protected] laboratory had faced mothballing School of Environment, Arts and Society. The Aquarius, the world’s completed three saturation- al budget. The University of FIU biology professor Jim only undersea research facility, diving missions aboard North Carolina-Wilmington, Fourqurean, an aquanaut renewed its lease at its Conch Aquarius. “It’s like a space which operated the Aquarius who took part in an Aquarius Reef site off Islamorada. station underwater there in with federal grants for nearly mission, will oversee the Florida International the Florida Keys.” two decades, closed its land facility’s operations. University will take over FIU, a state university in base on the Port Largo canal Several “core members” operations and maintenance Miami, received a NOAA in Key Largo on Jan. 1. of the Aquarius Research of the underwater living grant to maintain the 43-foot- Now, FIU staff will seek Base staff will join the FIU facility, which is owned by long metal structure, additional money to under- staff, including Otto Rutten, the National Oceanic and anchored to the ocean bottom take new multi-day missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchapter G—Regattas and Marine Parades
    SUBCHAPTER G—REGATTAS AND MARINE PARADES PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 100.719 Annual Suncoast Offshore Challenge; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL. NAVIGABLE WATERS 100.720 Annual Suncoast Offshore Grand Prix; Gulf of Mexico, Sarasota, FL. Sec. 100.724 Annual Augusta Invitational Rowing 100.01 Purpose and intent. Regatta; Savannah River, Augusta, GA. 100.05 Definition of terms used in this part. 100.728 Special Local Regulations; Hurri- 100.T07–0110 Special Local Regulations; Low cane Offshore Classic, St. Petersburg, Country Splash, Wando River, Cooper FL. River, and Charleston Harbor, Charles- 100.729 Columbus Day Regatta, Biscayne ton, SC. Bay, Miami, FL. 100.10 Coast Guard-State agreements. 100.732 Annual River Race Augusta; Savan- 100.15 Submission of application. nah River, Augusta, GA. 100.20 Action on application for event as- 100.734 Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade; signed to State regulation by Coast Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL. Guard-State agreement. 100.736 Annual Fort Myers Beach air show; 100.25 Action on application for event not Fort Myers Beach, FL. assigned to State regulation by Coast 100.740 Annual Offshore Super Series Boat Guard-State agreement. Race; Fort Myers Beach, FL. 100.30 Approval required for holding event. 100.801 Annual Marine Events in the Eighth 100.35 Special local regulations. Coast Guard District. 100.35T05–0276 Special Local Regulations for 100.901 Great Lakes annual marine events. Marine Events; Potomac River, National 100.902 Special Local Regulations; Annual Harbor Access Channel, MD. Bayview Mackinac Race. 100.35T05–0482 Special Local Regulations for 100.903 Harborfest Dragon Boat Race; South Marine Events, Wrightsville Channel; Haven, MI.
    [Show full text]
  • FWC Division of Law Enforcement Weekly Report January 13, 2017
    FWC Division of Law Enforcement Weekly Report January 13, 2017 through January 19, 2017 This report represents some events the FWC handled over the past two weeks; however, it does not include all actions taken by the Division of Law Enforcement. Patrol, Protect, Preserve NORTHWEST REGION CASES BAY COUNTY Officers Wicker and N. Basford were on water patrol in East Bay when they heard shooting coming from the Cooks Bayou area. They saw several vessels in the area chasing ducks and shooting while underway. The officers stopped one of the vessels which had two hunters on board. The hunters had three redhead ducks in their possession. Both were issued citations for hunting waterfowl from a moving vessel. Officers Walker and Leonard were on resource patrol when they saw a vehicle parked at the intersection of Crews Lake Road and Environmental Road on the western boundary line of Pine Log State Forest. They waited in the area for the owner to return to the vehicle. Approximately 20 minutes later, a subject walked out of the woods and returned to the vehicle. The subject stated that two of his hunting dogs had gotten loose and that he was looking for them. One of the officers backtracked from where the subject exited the woods and found a loaded .270 caliber rifle 100 yards south of Environmental Road. They also found a tree stand and trail camera within 50 feet of whole corn. The subject admitted to baiting the area and that the gun, tree stand and trail camera were his. The subject was cited accordingly.
    [Show full text]