DOCSLIB.ORG

Roundabouts in Harford County on County Roads

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roundabouts in Harford County on County Roads N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b o o u u t t c & Transportation Planning C C o o n n f f e e r r e e n n c c e e 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 D D R R February 2005 Cheryl Banigan, Chief, Traffi A Local Perspective Jeffrey M. Stratmeyer, P.E., Chief Engineer A A F F T T Roundabouts in Harford County, Maryland Roundabouts in Harford County, By: N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b they are landscaped, a . Currently, there are the center islands are o and is home for over o u u Constant Friendship Blvd. t t C C ve been added on the approach o o rbing around the perimeter and , increase intersection safety, n n roads, and started using f f e e r r e e n n c c e Constant Friendship Business Park, at the e Constant Friendship e e but the signs can not restrict sight distance majority of them have a 15’ wide travel lane, majority communities. Before communities. 2 sight distance and that the root systems of the sight distance and that the root systems 2 with the curbing around the island or with the trances into BJ’s Warehouse, and one access to 0 eter center island that may be landscaped. We 0 ladder trucks. Several of h are located on Harford County controlled h are located on Harford County ads where they are located 0 more Metropolitan region Metropolitan more 0 Future entrance Future entrance 5 5 Truck access e County’s Grounds Maintenance Supervisor to ounty drivers to the concept of roundabouts. drivers to the concept of roundabouts. ounty D D R R A Local Perspective A A F F roads are constructed with cu to control intersection capacity T T eakaway structure. Reflectors ha business or community is permitted to install a sign indicating business or community is permitted y maintains over 1,000 miles of over 1,000 miles y maintains t was constructed in th Roundabouts in Harford County, Maryland Roundabouts in Harford County, BJ’s entrance landscaped and maintained by local businesses or landscaped and maintained and reviewed by th be submitted plan must ensure the proposed landscaping will not restrict plantings will not create a maintenance problem truck apron. Additionally, the that they sponsor the landscaping and maintenance, be constructed as a br and must visibility. sides of the splitter islands to improve have a design speed of fifteen miles per hour. The have a design speed of fifteen miles a 15 foot wide truck apron and a 40’ - 50’ diam changed our signs on the outside edge of the splitter islands to only install flex posts at the request of the fire department to accommodate All of the roundabouts on County Maryland is part of the Balti Harford County, end of a cul-de-sac in 1995. There were two en the adjacent lot proposed from the cul-de-sac. We felt the roundabout would effectively control access to the lots and introduce Harford C The County’s first roundabou 225,000 residents. The Count roundabouts in 1995 as a means the residential integrity of the ro and maintain Harford County, 14 of whic 16 roundabouts in under design. roadways and an additional three N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a interchange and US 1 b b o o u u t t C C respectively. The ADT on o o wn of Bel Air. The population e 24 between I-95 and the Town n decade, and is expected to n f f e a missing segment of the roadway a missing e r r e 24 and Business Route 1, the e e n n c c so connect to MD Route 24 are projected to e e l communities, two elementary schools, a a four-legged intersection that also includes Currently, the ADT on MD 24 just northwest Currently, the 2 2 the corridor) is constructed by a developer and the corridor) is constructed siness becomes a useable commuter route. a useable commuter siness becomes between I-95 and the Town of Bel Air. The was decided to consider using them in other was decided to consider using them MD 924 between the I-95 0 0 a major roadway was on a major collector road, roadway was on a major a major 0 0 5 5 D D R R limited commerciallimited developments concerns regarding Tollgate Road: concerns regarding Tollgate A A road that parallels MD Rout F F ate Road are 22,700 and 10,800 increased by 34% in the past oximately five miles to the To five miles oximately T T and MD 924 veer northward after their intersection with MD 24 is complete between MD Rout is complete new hospital, a new library and new hospital, Tollgate Road is a collector Tollgate Road primarily connects residentia Tollgate Road primarily of Bel Air. have failing levels of service. intersections with other collector roads that al Once Tollgate Road • • locations. The first location considered along Tollgate Road that parallels Maryland Route 24 Tollgate Road Maryland 24 corridor is part of the designated growth area for Harford County. intersects Maryland Route 24 just north of I-95 at MD 924. Both Tollgate Road and then parallel MD 24 for appr in the MD Route 24 corridor has increase by an additional 19% by the year 2020. of the I-95 interchange is 64,800. The roundabout worked well and, as a result, it The ADT’s on MD 924 and Tollg Tollgate Road is expected to increase to over 18,000 when of (approximately 1,500’ long and in the middle the entire roadway between MD 24 and US 1 Bu There are 8 traffic signals on MD 24 and 10 on Business, which raised the following N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d rketplace Drive, in a a nd at least one more nd at least one more s estimated at about b b o o vehicle accidents; one u u of roundabouts was t t C C effort, five roundabouts have Residential development Residential development o o e roundabout was constructed as e roundabout n n f f e e 24 and MD 924 may consider r r e e n n c c o more are in design a o more velopment to the east and also connects to velopment Road corridor was at Ma e e the roundabout and wa s or to construct a roundabout for his access ketplace Drive s, including the relocation of several large s, including the 2 2 0 0 void impacts to the existing residents on the right void impacts cation. Two were single got stuck in the island in the middle of the middle in the island in the got stuck 0 0 r intersections…a series 5 5 acter of Tollgate Road, while reducing speeding and ly $220,000. The roundabout option actually D D R R A A eeding down Tollgate Road. ying attention, hit the curb of the splitter island and blew out ad corridor. As a result of that F at delayed traffic on MD F T T ite was given the option of installing a signal with additional ite was given the option of installing a signal with additional Tollgate Road/Mar the less expensive option and th Commercial development development Commercial bypassing those delays by sp Concerns were expressed th • In an effort to maintain the residential char controlling the volumes of traffic at the majo proposed for the entire Tollgate Ro driver was under the influence of alcohol and roundabout and the other wasn’t pa a tire. There have been 3 reported accidents at this lo The first roundabout constructed along the Tollgate The first roundabout been constructed along Tollgate Road since 1996, tw is proposed. 1996. Marketplace Drive accesses a commercial de MD 24. The developer for the s road widening to accommodate turning movement onto Tollgate Road. The signal and improvement would have cost approximate utility poles roadway on the approach to narrowing the involved $92,000. The developer chose photo below. Note the offset to a shown in the side of the picture. N N a a t t i i o o n n a a l l R R o o u u n n d d a a b b complete between MD complete o o veloper who was adding u u t t C C ve been a factor in several o o ted by the County to ted by the County to about at Tollgate Road and n n 3,000 on Singer Road. The ADT 3,000 on Singer f f e e r r e e n n c c e and to eliminate the concerns associated e ad. The vertical curve contributed to reduced ad. The vertical curve contributed is expected to increase with additional 2 2 e Road when the road is Tollgate Road for approximately ½ mile to the Tollgate Road ½ mile for approximately 0 0 l traffic flows warranted the inclusion of more l traffic flows warranted the inclusion of more also constructed by a de road in the County and there have been no with the Marketplace Drive roundabout, the 0 0 5 5 D D R R e roundabout was sugges e roundabout A A F F r approximately 12 - 18 months before deciding that the r approximately 12 - 18 months T T itional installations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix O (PDF)
    APPENDIX P FIRE RESPONSE HAZMAT BOX INCIDENT CODE INCIDENT DATE LOCATION NUMBER FIRE COMPANY DESCRIPTION WATERSHED 001787 M 09‐001 01/05/2009 GEORGE STREET AND ARCHER STREET 0304 03 BODY FLUID CLEAN UP WINTERS RUN 003176 I 09‐002 01/08/2009 MEADOW ROAD ‐ 211 0354 03 INVESTIGATION OF CHEMICAL SMELL IN AREA WINTERS RUN 001749 C 09‐003 01/05/2009 CONSTANT FRIENDSHIP BOULEVARD ‐ 413 0403 04 MIXTURE OF CHEMICALS IN DUMPSTER, VAPOR CLOUD EVIDENT WINTERS RUN 001949 I 09‐004 01/05/2009 LAURENTUM PARKWAY ‐ 1 0409 04 INVESTIGATION OF BOILER DESCALER SPILL ON 12/31/08 BYNUM RUN 005883 I 09‐005 01/12/2009 BROADWAY ‐ 202 0341 03 SMALL FUEL OIL SPILL AT LOCATION BYNUM RUN 009088 I 09‐006 01/17/2009 HOPPERS LANE ‐ 625 0501 05 NOTIFICATION OF HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS MIXED WITH INJURY LOWER SUSQUEHANNA D09‐007 01/17/2009 CITY OF HAVRE DE GRACE 0500 05 STANDBY FOR PRESIDENTIAL SECURITY EVENT LOWER SUSQUEHANNA 008979 C 09‐008 01/17/2009 HARDEES DRIVE ‐ 1100 0215 02 FUEL SPILL FROM TRACTOR TRAILER SWAN CREEK 009857 M 09‐009 0101/19/2009/19/2009 CANDLEWOOD DRIVE0806 08 BODY FLUID CLEAN UP WINTERS RUN 009550 I 09‐010 01/18/2009 BEL AIR PIKE ‐ 615 0304 03 INVESTIGATION OF CONTAINER OF MERCURY FOUND IN LOCKER WINTERS RUN 013648 I 09‐011 01/27/2009 BEL AIR ROAD ‐ 1510 0343 03 INVESTIGATION OF HIGH CO LEVELS IN BUILDING WINTERS RUN 012609 I 09‐012 01/24/2009 ROBIN CIRCLE ‐ 1608 0312 03 PAINT SPILL ON ROADWAY BYNUM RUN 014664 C 09‐013 01/28/2009 I‐95 SB MM 87.5 0195 01 FUEL SPILL AND PUMP OFF OF TRACTOR TRAILER SWAN CREEK 015665 C 09‐014 01/30/2009 I‐95 NB MM 90.5
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No
    RESOLUTION NO. 1154-20 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2019 HARFORD COUNTY ANNUAL GROWTH REPORT WHEREAS, Chapter 759 of the Laws of Maryland: the Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Smart Growth Areas Act of 1997 require municipalities to adopt County standards related to adequate public facilities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, the Development Regulation, Article II, Section 165-21 Annual Growth Report outlines the procedures for complying with the County Adequate Public Facilities requirements for schools; and WHEREAS, Chapter 165 of the Bel Air Town Code, requires submittal of the Harford County Growth Report to the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners for acceptance at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, in June, 2020, the Harford County Department of Planning and Zoning submitted the Annual Growth Report attached hereto, indicating that the utilization rates of some public schools serving the Town of Bel Air exceed 110% of rated capacity; and WHEREAS, Homestead-Wakefield Elementary School (currently 112%), Red Pump Elementary School (113% in 2021), Bel Air Elementary School (113% in 2020) and Bel Air Middle School (currently 115%) are projected to be over capacity within the next three years. However, because all of these attendance areas abut schools that are identified as under capacity, no restrictions are mandated by code. All other school service areas will not be affected by adequacy standards established by the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bel Air Board of Town Commissioners that the 2019 Harford County Annual Growth Report attached hereto, shall be officially accepted and shall provide the basis for review and approval of residential development per Section 165-21 of the Town of Bel Air Development Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • US 34 Business Access Control Plan
    BUSINESS Access Control Plan 34 State Highway 257 to 35th Avenue 52nd Ave. Ct. 45th Ave. 34 BUSINESS Promontory Pkwy. 54th Ave. 34 101st Ave. 95th Ave. Ave. 83rd 77th Ave. 71st Ave. 35th Ave. BUSINESS 59th Ave. 47th Ave. Promontory Cir. 34 Prepared by: In cooperation with: COLORADO DOT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION November 2012 US 34 Business Route Access Control Plan (West 10th Street) State Highway 257 to 35th Avenue Greeley Prepared by: North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization In cooperation with: Colorado Department of Transportation, Region 4 City of Greeley Weld County November 2012 Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Reference No. 10-045-06 Greeley: Access Control Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES Page Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Figure 2.1 Mobility vs. Access ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1.1 Project Background and Goal --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Figure 2.2 State Highway Access Category Assignments in Greeley and the Surrounding Area ---------- 9 1.2 Access Control Benefits ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Figure 2.3 City of Greeley Official 2012 Zoning Map ----------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.3 Coordination with Local and Regional Transportation Planning Efforts ---------------------------- 2 Figure 2.4 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Update
    Construction Update West Rutland Paving/Intersection Project [Business Route 4 and VT 4A] DATE: Thursday, 6/4/20 PROJECT TYPE: Roadway LOCATION: This project begins at the US-4 and BUS-4 intersection in West Rutland and heads east along BUS-4 to the Class 1 Town Highway limit in front of the Rutland Town Clerk's Office (MM 0.997). The total project length is 3.094 miles. The intersection project is located in the town of West Rutland at the intersection of Business Route 4 and Vermont Route 4A (near the Price Chopper Plaza). SCOPE OF WORK: Construction activities include coarse milling (grinding) of the roadway, paving with a leveling and wearing (final) course, intersection reconfiguration (removal of the jughandle), traffic signal improvements, reconstruction of an at-grade railroad crossing, guardrail, pavement markings, signs, drainage rehabilitation and other highway related items. As part of Governor Scott’s “Work Smart, Stay Safe” order, all construction crews are currently subject to safety restrictions and precautions. ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, WEEK of 6/8: Work at the signalized intersection of Route 4 and Route 4A will continue next week. A trench crossing at the intersection with associated signal work is tentatively scheduled for next week. If this work occurs, it will take approximately three days to complete, and motorists can expect lane closures and delays at the intersection. Work at the railroad crossing is almost complete. On Monday and Tuesday next week crews will be milling and paving the approaches at the railroad crossing. Traffic diversions will be in place. Minor track work will occur next week as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Signs—Conventional Roads
    2011 Edition - Revision 2 Page 143 CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS—CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard: 01 The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any road or street other than low-volume roads (as defined in Section 5A.01), expressways, and freeways. Section 2D.02 Application Support: 01 Guide signs are essential to direct road users along streets and highways, to inform them of intersecting routes, to direct them to cities, towns, villages, or other important destinations, to identify nearby rivers and streams, parks, forests, and historical sites, and generally to give such information as will help them along their way in the most simple, direct manner possible. 02 Chapter 2A addresses placement, location, and other general criteria for signs. Section 2D.03 Color, Retroreflection, and Illumination Support: 01 Requirements for illumination, retroreflection, and color are stated under the specific headings for individual guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard: 02 Except where otherwise provided in this Manual for individual signs or groups of signs, guide signs on streets and highways shall have a white message and border on a green background. All messages, borders, and legends shall be retroreflective and all backgrounds shall be retroreflective or illuminated. Support: 03 Color coding is sometimes used to help road users distinguish between multiple potentially confusing destinations. Examples of valuable uses of color coding include guide signs for roadways approaching or inside an airport property with multiple terminals serving multiple airlines, and community wayfinding guide signs for various traffic generator destinations within a community or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Assessment of the Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives
    Appendix D – Engineering Assessment of the Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives: By Sub-Segment Milwaukee-Twin Cities High-Speed Rail Corridor Program Appendix D Technical Report Engineering Assessment of the Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Quandel Consultants, LLC Version: March 10, 2011 Appendix D: Engineering Assessment Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 TRACK SUB-SEGMENTS: ................................................................................................................. 5 Track Sub-Segment 1 (Segment A) ............................................................................................. 5 Track Sub-Segment 2 (Segments B & C) .................................................................................... 9 Track Sub-Segment 3 (Segment D) ........................................................................................... 13 Track Sub-Segment 4 (Segment II)............................................................................................ 16 Track Sub-Segment 5 (Segment II)............................................................................................ 20 Track Sub-Segment 6 (Segment F) ........................................................................................... 23 Track Sub-Segment 7 (Segment II)...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Click on Directory to Download
    2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:45 AM Page 5 We hope you find this edion of the Directory of Maryland Community Colleges useful. The Maryland Associaon of Community Colleges (MACC) staff makes every effort to keep this informaon accurate and up­to­date. Please help us maintain this valuable resource; if your college’s informaon changes during the year, please send your updates to Jane Thomas at: [email protected] or contact her at 410­974­8117. Throughout the year, your changes will be made to the online PDF version of the directory that is posted on the MACC website at www.mdacc.org. We appreciate your support and look forward to a successful year ahead for our colleges and the students we serve. i 2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:45 AM Page 6 ii 2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:46 AM Page 7 Foreword..................................................................................................................... i Purpose, Philosophy, and Mission ............................................................................1 Staff of the Maryland Associaon of Community Colleges.....................................3 Direcons to the MACC office ...................................................................................4 Execuve Commiee .................................................................................................5 Board of Directors ......................................................................................................6 Affinity Groups and Chief Officers.............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Mini Roundabouts Back-In Angle Parking the Two Mini-Roundabouts Will Be Constructed at the Is Surrounded by a Continuous Travel Lane
    Project Purpose & Description Project Purpose The purpose of the Highway 4 project is to achieve a smooth ride, To/From Sleepy Eye Legend replace poor utilities beneath the highway, and to enhance pedestrian Project Area Business Route accommodations. Hwy 4 Detour Proposed Mini-Roundabout Project Description Highway 4 through the City of St. James is in poor condition and in St. James1 Northside2 disrepair. The city utility infrastructure is also in poor condition and is Secondary Elementary currently experiencing multiple breaks each winter. MnDOT received School School municipal consent for the proposed project in December 2014. The 3 project includes reconstruction of approximately 1.6 miles of Highway 4, Armour Eckrich Meats including two new mini-roundabouts. 4 Project elements include: Nelson5 Furniture Reconstruct Highway 4 from approximately National Guard • Training & 6 200 feet south of 10th Avenue S. to 11th Ave N. Community Center • Realign 7th Avenue S. to address the skew and increase safety • Construct mini-roundabouts at the two existing signals on 1st Ave S. 8 • Provide back-in angle parking on 1st Ave S. • Replace existing sidewalks and install new sidewalks 10County Courthouse Library9 • Bring all pedestrian accommodations up to American’s with 11St. Paul’s Lutheran School Disability Act (ADA) standards 13 • Improve boulevard aesthetics and safety • Upgrade storm sewer throughout the corridor • Update lighting standards and fixtures 12 To/From Hwy 60 Armstrong Preschool/14 Community Education Project Schedule: County Apr. – Sept. 2015 .......................Project design Fair Grounds Oct. 2015 – Jan. 2016 ..............Agency approvals Feb. – Apr. 2016 .........................Project bidding May – Nov. 2016 ........................Planned construction To/From Hwy 60/Hwy 4 To/From Hwy 60 Highway 4 at 1st Avenue South Mini Roundabouts Back-In Angle Parking The two mini-roundabouts will be constructed at the is surrounded by a continuous travel lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011
    Arizona State Rail Plan March 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements The State Rail Plan was made possible by the cooperative efforts of the following individuals and organizations who contributed significantly to the successful completion of the project: Rail Technical Advisory Team Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Chris Watson, Arizona Corporation Commission Bonnie Allin, Tucson Airport Authority Reuben Teran, Arizona Game and Fish Department Zoe Richmond, Union Pacific Railroad David Jacobs, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Jane Morris, City of Phoenix – Sky Harbor Airport Gordon Taylor, Arizona State Land Department Patrick Loftus, TTX Company Cathy Norris, BNSF Railway Angela Mogel, Bureau of Land Management ADOT Project Team Jack Tomasik, Central Arizona Association of Governments Sara Allred, Project Manager Paul Johnson, City of Yuma Kristen Keener Busby, Sustainability Program Manager Jermaine Hannon, Federal Highway Administration John Halikowski, Director Katai Nakosha, Governor’s Office John McGee, Executive Director for Planning and Policy James Chessum, Greater Yuma Port Authority Mike Normand, Director of Transit Programs Kevin Wallace, Maricopa Association of Governments Shannon Scutari, Esq. Director, Rail & Sustainability Marc Pearsall, Maricopa Association of Governments Services Gabe Thum, Pima Association of Governments Jennifer Toth, Director, Multi-Modal Planning Division Robert Bohannan, RH Bohannan & Associates Robert Travis, State Railroad Liaison Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Roundabout Solutions for Complex Traffic Environments
    ROUNDABOUT SOLUTIONS FOR COMPLEX TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENTS Author/Presenter’s Name: Mike Bittner Mailing Address: 728 East Beaton Drive, West Fargo, ND 58078 Telephone Number: 701 271 4879 E-Mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Roundabouts have many distinct features the engineering community can employ to solve complex or unique traffic scenarios. This paper illustrates how to capitalize on many of the features through three real- world project examples. In the first example, a roundabout is used to combine two closely spaced skewed intersections into one five legged intersection. This example is located in the heart of a city exploding with population and traffic growth. Under existing conditions, the two closely spaced intersections experience spillback across one another resulting in poor intersection operations and frequent conflicts. This is further exacerbated by the 7 uncontrolled driveways within 215 feet of the major intersection. The proposed five-legged roundabout mitigates the negative effect of the skewed intersections, consolidates the two closely spaced intersections and provides access management for the uncontrolled driveways. Not only does this improvement provide an anticipated reduction in crash potential and improved intersection operations, the alternative also provides significant aesthetic benefits, leading to a revitalized city center. In the second example, roundabouts are employed upstream of a central intersection that is oversaturated and experiencing safety issues specific to permitted left-turn movements. The proposed bowtie intersection configuration converts left-turn movements at the central intersection to U-turn maneuvers at the upstream roundabouts. Eliminating left-turn maneuvers at the central intersection resolves safety issues corresponding to the movement. Eliminating left-turn maneuvers also prioritizes high volume through movements at the central intersection, reducing motorist delays and queues that block upstream intersections and business driveways.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Growth Report
    2012 Annual Growth Report Harford County Government Department of Planning and Zoning David R. Craig Harford County Executive Preserving Harford’s Past; Promoting Harford’s Future Mary F. Chance Director of Administration C. Pete Gutwald Director of Planning and Zoning This document is available in alternative format upon request. The 2012 Annual Growth Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 Growth Trends ............................................................................................................ 6 Population Projection Methodology .................................................................. 6 Regional Data ................................................................................................... 6 Harford County Development Activity ............................................................... 6 New Subdivisions ................................................................................ 12 New Building Permits Issued ............................................................... 12 Development Capacity ........................................................................ 12 Zoning Map Amendments .................................................................... 12 Planning Document Updates ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HA-799 Carter Farm Bridge (Crowl Farm Bridge)
    HA-799 Carter Farm Bridge (Crowl Farm Bridge) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 09-12-2018 MARYLAND IDSTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM no ~ Property Name: Carter Farm Bridge Inventory Number: HA-799 Address: 3301 Rocks Road (_MD 24) 101 Cherry Hill Road Historic district: yes X no City: Street Zip Code: 21154 County: Harford USGS Quadrangle(s): Jarrettsville Property Owner: Garden Fence Farm LLC Tax Account TD Number: 05-008743 Tax Map Parcel Number(s): 0117 Tax Map Number: 0025 Project: MD 24 Rocks Road Section
    [Show full text]