Precast Concrete Segmental Bridges America's Beautiful and Affordable
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W
Policy Study 401 February 2012 Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and pro- moting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Acknowledgement This project was supported by a grant to Reason Foundation from Associated Industries of Florida. The analysis, findings and recommendations in this report are entirely those of the authors. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? By Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Executive Summary The 2011 Florida legislative session saw several proposals that would have consolidated some or all of the local toll authorities into the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE). -
Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701
Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701 TABLE TO § 100.501—ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 100.501 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983—Continued No. Date Event Sponsor Location 68 .. June 25 and 26, Thunder on the Kent Narrows All waters of Prospect Bay enclosed by the following points: 2011. Narrows. Racing Asso- Latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W., to lati- ciation. tude 38°58′02.0″ N., longitude 076°15′05.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′38.0″ N., longitude 076°15′29.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′28.0″ N., longitude 076°15′23.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W. [USCG–2007–0147, 73 FR 26009, May 8, 2008, as forbid and control the movement of all amended by USCG–2009–0430, 74 FR 30223, vessels in the regulated area(s). When June 25, 2009; 75 FR 750, Jan. 6, 2010; USCG– hailed or signaled by an official patrol 2011–0368, 76 FR 26605, May 9, 2011] vessel, a vessel in these areas shall im- EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: By USCG–2010–1094, mediately comply with the directions at 76 FR 13886, Mar. 15, 2011, the Table to given. Failure to do so may result in § 100.501 was amended by suspending lines No. expulsion from the area, citation for 13, No. 19, No. 21 and No. 23, and adding a new failure to comply, or both. heading and entries 65, 66, 67, and 68, effec- tive Apr. 1, 2011 through Sept. 1, 2011. -
An Overview of Precast Prestressed Segmental Bridges
An Overview of Precast Prestressed ♦ Segmental Bridges Walter Podolny, Jr. Bridge Division Office of Engineering Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. he seventies will be recorded by Construction in this manner may T engineering historians as the de- also have a serious impact upon envi- cade in which prestressed concrete ronment and ecology. Prestressed segmental bridge construction came of segmental construction has extended age in North America. Segmental box the practical span of concrete bridges girder bridges have attracted the at- to approximately 800 ft (244 m). tention and captured the imagination Where segmental construction is used of bridge engineers and designers in conjunction with the cable-stay across the continent. bridge concept, the span range can be Because of practical limitations of extended to 1300 ft (400 m) and handling and shipping, the precast perhaps longer.' prestressed I-girder type of bridge Because construction of the super- construction is limited to an approxi- structure is executed from above, i.e., mate range of 120 to 150-ft (37 to 46 at deck level, the use of extensive m) spans. Beyond this range of span, falsework is avoided. Thus, there is no post-tensioned cast-in-place box gir- effect upon navigation clearance from ders on falsework are more attractive. falsework during construction and the However, in certain instances the ex- cost of extensive formwork is elimi- tensive use of falsework can prove to nated. Segmental viaduct type bridges be an economic disadvantage. Where provide a method whereby the impact deep ravines or navigable waterways of highway construction through en- must be crossed, extensive formwork vironmentally sensitive areas can be may be impractical. -
Florida's Turnpike System
3/15/2016 Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Nicola Liquori, CPA Deputy Executive Director / Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2016 Florida’s Turnpike System Largest toll system in Florida Customer Characteristics Operational Characteristics • 2.5M customers / day • 768M transactions • 61% of population • $866M Revenue • 96% FL Plates • 138 interchanges • 81% SunPass participation • 25 mainline plazas • 8% TOLL‐BY‐PLATE • 600 toll lanes • 2,300 lane miles Florida Department of Transportation 1 3/15/2016 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise GARCON POINT FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY BRIDGE MID-BAY BRIDGE and SPENCE PARKWAY WESTERN BELTWAY, PART C NORTHERN COIN SYSTEM 483 miles SUNCOAST PARKWAY 2 SEMINOLE EXPRESSWAY 28 miles SUNCOAST PARKWAY BEACHLINE EAST EXPESSWAY BEACHLINE WEST EXPESSWAY 511 miles VETERANS EXPRESSWAY TICKET SYSTEM 127 miles I-4 CONNECTOR 18 miles SOUTHERN COIN PINELLAS BAYWAY SYSTEM SYSTEM 656 miles SAWGRASS SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE EXPRESSWAY POLK PARKWAY Florida’s Turnpike 595 EXPRESS Florida’s Turnpike (Future) SOUTHERN CONNECTOR 95 EXPRESS EXTENSION Other FDOT Owned HOMESTEAD EXTENSION Other FDOT Operated ALLIGATOR ALLEY (SR 821) Florida Department of Transportation AET Schedule Open to Traffic: 97 miles already converted Suncoast Parkway 228 miles will be converted Veterans Expressway Ticket System Sawgrass Expressway Southern Coin SR 821 (HEFT) Florida Department of Transportation 2 3/15/2016 Why All‐Electronic Tolling Conversion? • Customer acceptance: Transponder/image based • Video technology • Convenience: No one stops • -
Opponents Blast Report Favoring New Bridge by Caren Herman Tesllmony by So-Called Experts
> ••&• r So > r Opponents blast report favoring new bridge By Caren Herman tesllmony by so-called experts. It's enough to interest; Staff writer make your hair curl, yei we don't seem to have "All of the testimony that was taken can be Council chambers were packed Tuesday anyone in this city who is knowledgeable looKed at as having some bias. The chairman with residents angry over the city's bridge enough to see through It. It is a sad of the committee is an associate or an~ committee majority report that recommends commentary but unfortunately, that Is the employee of the man who is attempting to immediate ^replacement of the Sanibcl way it is," charged Andy Sclpos. develop.;.the last undeveloped part of the Causeway. .__. island." I-iljequisl said. • " Speaker after speaker said city council See letter from bridge committee 'The person heading the committee is "stacked" the committee with people in favor associated with development and may stand of the bridge; they questioned the integrity of ^ members on Page 40 to gain from further .development," he said, experts who testified and claimed those John Uljequist, who sough! but did not attacking bridge committee chairman Joe experts, and committee members, all had receive an appointment on the committee, Bums. ' " • ~ •' ulterior motives and something to Rain from a said Ihe hearings were not necessarily "above "I am going to Mke that real personally," new bridge. * admonished Mayor Jerry Mucnch, calling board and fair." Both experts and some Liljequist's barrage on Burns a "low blow." 'Never in my -10 years of engineering committee members would benefit from a new experience have I heard so much misleading bridge, providing for Inherent conflicts of •please see page 8A FEBRUARY 23,1990 VOLUME 18 = NUMBER 15 ' • ' 3 SECTIONS, 56 PAGES SANIBEL AND CAPTIVA, FLORIDA Where's the sand? Captiva'sncwjettylsohe " suspect in higher erosion • on Northern Sanibel shore Dr MAX Frledersdorf ABC Sale Capliva Memorial Library and an island starts" scholarship fund. -
State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice
State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice The following Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy bonds. It is marked with a dated date and speaks only as of that date, which may be prior to the date the Official Statement was posted on this website. The Division of Bond Finance undertakes no obligation to update any information included therein except for certain annual and periodic reports which may be found on the EMMA website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. This Official Statement may be removed from the website at any time. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion in the Official Statement are subject to change without notice and the posting of the Official Statement on this website does not imply that there has been no change in such information or the affairs of the State of Florida since the dated date of the Official Statement or date of posting such Official Statement. New Issue - Book-Entry Only This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information about the 2019A Bonds. Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the reader. To make an informed decision, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in Appendix A. $86,640,000 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Transportation Sunshine Skyway Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on the inside front cover Bond Ratings -
Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads. -
STATE—Concrete Bridges in Florida a History
STATE Concrete Bridges in Florida A History of Innovation by Lex Collins, Florida Department of Transportation lorida has long been famous for its sunshine Fand beautiful beaches. So it is only natural that most of the state’s population is located along the coastline. Florida is the fourth most populous state in the United States, yet it ranks only 22nd in land area. The Sunshine State is also the top travel destination in the world. Because of all it offers, the state’s population is growing at a significant rate. All this means that Small arch bridge in Mexico Beach large numbers of bridges continue to be required is fitting for the for so many people living in a relatively small site. Photo: PB. area. However, the same warm weather and salt water that bring people to Florida also combine to create a severely corrosive environment for its infrastructure. Thus, concrete has been and remains a natural choice for the state’s bridge designers. Florida has been using concrete for bridge construction for over 90 years. We have a reinforced concrete bridge built in 1915 and a series of precast, prestressed concrete I-beam bridges built in the mid-1950s, all of which are still in service. Because all bridges tend to be a focal point for the landscapes in which they are placed, the state’s citizens demand and deserve attractive structures that enhance their surroundings, instead of dividing and detracting from them. At the same time, public budgets are always tight and owners require bridges that are both affordable and durable. -
Sceniccorridorbroch-Outside (From Pdf)
Our Story The Florida Keys Scenic Highway (FKSH) corridor runs from Mile Marker 110, north of the spectacular Jewfish Creek Bridge, to Mile Marker 0 in Old Town Key West. The scenic highway corridor also extends five miles on each side of the highway. So, the FKSH truly encompasses all of the Florida Keys, its natural wonders, and its communities. Through efforts beginning in 1996 with numerous public meetings and workshops to create the Corridor Management Plan, the FDOT designated the FKSH a Florida Scenic Highway in 2001. In 2007, the Florida Keys Mission Statement Scenic Corridor Alliance (FKSCA) was To enhance the scenic image, preserve our established as the corridor management entity heritage and diversity, and promote the natural responsible for implementing the goals and beauty of the Florida Keys Scenic Corridor. objectives concerning the FKSH. The FKSCA completed its Corridor Management Plan Five- Year Update in fall of 2008 and applied for designation in the National Scenic Byways Program. The FKSCA proved our highway corridor meets the designation criteria of being considered a “destination unto itself” and “providing an exceptional travel experience.” Our scenic and recreational intrinsic qualities “are those which best represent the nation, are nationally recognized, and contain one-of-a- kind features that do not exist elsewhere.” The Florida Keys Scenic Highway is a natural fit. In October 2009, the Federal Highway Administration designated the Florida Keys Scenic Highway as an All-American Road – Florida Keys Scenic Corridor Alliance the highest status in the National Scenic P.O. Box 501930 Byways System. Marathon, FL 33050-1930 www.ScenicHighwayFlKeys.com GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF INTEREST City of Key West Key West City Limits to 7 Mile Bridge ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP What We Do 7 Mile Bridge to Long Key Bridge The Florida Keys Scenic Corridor Alliance (FKSCA) Individual $25 is the Corridor Management Entity for the Florida Long Key Bridge to Tavernier Creek Keys Scenic Highway (FKSH). -
Residence Inn Tierra Verde, Florida
TIERRE VERDE, FLORIDA The Information contained herein, including, without limitation, all photographs, maps and artwork, as well as any other information (whether written, electronic or verbal) furnished by Prime Hospitality Group (PHG) or their affiliates, or any of their respective officers, directors, shareholders, owners, employees, contractors or agents (collectively, the “Information”) is confidential, and is furnished solely for the purpose of a review by parties interested in the property, and is not to be used for any other purpose or made available to any other person without the express written consent of PHG. The Information is based in part upon Information supplied by PHG or their affiliates and in part upon financial Information obtained by PHG from sources that they deem reasonably reliable. Summaries of any documents are not intended to be comprehensive or all-inclusive, but rather only outline some of the provisions contained therein and are qualified in their entirety by the actual document to which they relate. While PHG has no reason to believe that the Information provided herein, or in any other marketing or due diligence materials provided, contains any material inaccuracies, PHG nor their affiliates, nor any of their respective officers, directors, shareholders, owners, employees, contractors or agents make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Information, including, without limitation, Information as to engineering or environmental matters or as to the future performance of the Property. Interested parties should make their own projections and form their own conclusions without reliance upon the material contained herein and should conduct their own due diligence, including engineering and environmental inspections, to determine the condition of the Property and the existence of any potentially hazardous material located at the property or used in the construction or maintenance of the building(s) at the site. -
Fkeys-CMP.Pdf
Florida KEYS Scenic Highway corridor management plan Submitted to Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Scenic Highways Coordinator 602 South Miami Avenue Miami, FL 33130 Submitted by The Florida Keys Scenic Highway CAG June Helbling and Kathy Toribio, Co-Chairs c/o Clean Florida Keys, Inc. PO Box 1528 Key West, FL 33041-1528 Prepared by The Florida Keys Scenic Highway CAG Peggy Fowler, Planning Consultant Patricia Fontova, Graphic Designer Carter and Burgess, Inc., Planning Consultants May, 2001 This document was prepared in part with funding from the Florida Department of Transportation. This document is formatted for 2-sided printing. Some pages were left intentionally blank for that reason. Table of Contents Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION .....................................................1 Chapter 2: CORRIDOR VISION ..................................................5 Chapter 3: CORRIDOR STORY ..................................................7 Chapter 4: DESIGNATION CRITERIA .......................................13 Chapter 5: BACKGROUND CONDITONS ANALYSIS ...............27 Chapter 6: RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN .......59 Chapter 7: PROTECTION TECHNIQUES................................ .63 Chapter 8: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ..............................69 Chapter 9: PARTNERSHIPS AND AGREEMENTS.................... .79 Chapter 10: FUNDING AND PROMOTION ...............................85 Chapter 11: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES ................93 Chapter 12: ACTION PLAN .........................................................97 -
Bridge Engineering Handbook Superstructure Design Segmental
This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 02 Oct 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: CRC Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK Bridge Engineering Handbook Superstructure Design Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan Segmental Concrete Bridges Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b16523-4 Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan Published online on: 24 Jan 2014 How to cite :- Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan. 24 Jan 2014, Segmental Concrete Bridges from: Bridge Engineering Handbook, Superstructure Design CRC Press Accessed on: 02 Oct 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b16523-4 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 Segmental Concrete Bridges 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................91