Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — a Review and Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — a Review and Perspective Special Report Segmental Bridge Construction in Florida — A Review and Perspective by Alan J. Moreton, P.E. State Structures Engineer Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, Florida 36 SYNOPSIS This paper offers an overview of the precast concrete segmental bridges designed and built in the state of Florida during the last ten years. The article summarizes various statistical structural parameters, segment manufacturing and erection methods, construction times, costs, and reviews problems typically encountered. Also included is a discussion of current industry and nationwide design and construction practices and some suggestions for possible improvements. CONTENTS Synopsis............................................37 1. Introduction ......................................38 2. Precast Segmental Bridges ........................38 3. Florida's Segmental Bridges .......................44 4. Structural Parametrics .............................44 5. Casting Yard Operations ...........................48 6. Rejected Segments .............................. 49 7. Erection Operations ...............................50 8. Some Typical Problems ...........................52 9. Time ............................................55 10. Costs ...........................................57 11. Administration Processes — Design, Construction andShop Drawings ...............................60 12. Actions by the Florida Department of Transportation ...63 13. Benefits of Segmental Bridges ......................64 14. Summary ........................................65 15. Conclusions .....................................66 References..........................................66 Acknowledgments....................................67 Appendix............................................68 PCI JOURNAUMay-June 1989 37 1. INTRODUCTION ode 01 concrete segmental bridges Precast segmental bridges were a nat- M were made possible as a result of ural development for efficiency, stan- postwar developments in post-tension- dardized mass production, speed of ing systems and materials technology. erection, the elimination of expensive This was spurred on by the need for formwork in deep valleys and over much reconstruction and new infra- navigable waterways and, particularly, structure in Europe following World to afford solutions for restricted con- War 11. After some initial development strnction access in congested urban or in J urope, these systems were intro- environmentall y sensitive areas. The duced into North America in the '60s most notable example of the latter is the and '70s and have now become quite Linn Cove Viaduct' on Grandfather commonplace. 17ountain in North Carolina. This Early post-tensioned concrete seg- bridge was constructed entirely From the mental bridges were cast-in-place in top, including piers and foundations, in cantilever using traveling formwork order to preserve the delicate environ- with spans of up to 400 ft (122 m.). This ment of this scenic region. It is the "pre- remains the preferred method for large cast type of segmental bridge that has spans such as the Houston Ship Channel found many applications in Florida over [at 750 ft (229 in)] and the planned con- the last 10 years. So far, 31 major struc- crete alternate for the Acosta Bridge in tures have been built, including the Jacksonville [at 630 ft (192 m)1. Sunshine Skyway Bridge. 2. PRECAST SEGMENTAL BRIDGES Precast segmental bridges are so Bridge over '1 ampa Bay.'.s called because they are made of indi- (h) Balanced Cantilever — Where vidual precast units or "segments" segments are erected sequentially in carefully manufactured in a precast con- cantilever on each side of an initial seg- crete plant, either on or off the site. The ment placed on top of the pier. Stability segments are later erected and secured is provided by a temporary tower or together by longitudinal post-tensioning other support near the permanent pier. to form each span or cantilever. Cantilevers are joined by cast-in-place They fall into the following general closures at niidspan. There are many categories according to their method of examples of this throughout the state, construction: including Ramp I at the Florida "l urn- (a) Span-by-Span — Where all the pike/1-75 Interchange (Fig. 3).8 segments of'one span between piers are (c) Progressive Cantilever - Where erected on a special supporting truss or segments are erected in cantilever in gantry and are longitudinally post-ten- one direction, starting at one end of the sioned together after making small bridge and progressing overall the piers cast-in-place closure joints at one or in sequence. Additional intermediate both ends next to the pier segments. temporary piers or towers with cable Examples include the Long Key and stays are needed to facilitate construc- Seven Mile Bridges in the Florida Keys tion in cantilever from one pier to the (Figs. 1 and 2) 2.3 and the high level ap- next. Examples include the Linn Cove proaches to the new Sunshine Skyway Viaduct in North Carolina and the Fon- 38 Fig. 1. Long Key Bridge — A precast segmental, post-tensioned, span-by-span structure. (Courtesy of Figg and Muller Engineers Inc., Designer) PC i JOURNAL/May-June 1989 39 M Fig. 2. Seven Mile Bridge — A precast segmental, post-tensioned, span-by-span structure. (Courtesy of Figg and Muller Engineers Inc.. Designer) tenoy Bridge in France.7 Temporary post-tensioning bars are In all these systems, the precast seg- used to secure each segment tightly to ments are usually made in a special form its neighbor prior to installing and or "casting cell" where a new segment stressing the permanent longitudinal is cast against its older neighbor to post-tensioning tendons which provide achieve a perfectly mating or "snatch the structural capacity and continuity of cast" joint. To date, only the "short line" the superstructure. Schematic illustra- or "single cell" casting machine has tions of typical span-by-span and bal- been used (as opposed to the "long line anced cantilever construction are bed" system) in Florida. In the long line shown iii Figs. 4 through 8. bed system, the entire soffit of the Other types of bridge construction bridge is laid out in the casting yard and systems are sometimes referred to as each segment is made in turn in its "segmental." These include: proper place. • Incremental launching When erected in the bridge, the joints • Partial precast and cast-in-place between segments are coated with cousin iction epoxy to fill any surface imperfections • Post-tensioned segmental I-girders and provide a tightly bedded joint. This • Cast-in-place post-tensioned also helps to seal and protect internal bridges post-tensioning tendons. Because exter- • Precast wet joint segmental nal post-tensioning tendons were used These systems share many common in the first span-by-span bridges in the features, especially post-tensioning and Florida Keys, the segments were not special erection systems of falsework, jointed with epoxy but were left dry. towers or travelers, etc. However, they However, all subsequent structures, in- are different in techniques from precast chiding the similar span-by-span ap- segmental bridges and, with the excep- proaches to the Skyway, have epoxy fil- tion of post-tensioned I-girders, have led joints between segments. found few applications in Florida. 40 Fig. 3. Ramp I — A precast segmental, post-tensioned, balanced cantilever viaduct. (Courtesy of Beiswenger Hoch and Associates, Designer) continuous deck P.T. at pier ,_ P.T. at midspan Section Fig. 4. Typical span-by-span superstructure. PCI JOURNALMay-June 1989 41 o - :-r-- L.driiied Shafts C.I.P. footer V-pier column pier = =_ - 4 drilled shafts- precast box pier Fig. 5. Typical span-by-span substructures. P.T.at pier T. at midspan Section Fig. 6. Typical balanced cantilever superstructure. 42 r C.I.P. joint ^caat-In-place piers ( __ pler with features - driven piles or spread footings II Fig. 7. Typical balanced cantilever substructures. Span-by-Span anchorage external P.T. deviation saddle Balanced Cantilever cantilever P.T. Ifl nsrI ii /1 mldspan closure ) continuity P.T. top and btm. Fig. 8. Typical post-tensioning. PCI JOURNALMay-June 1989 43 3. FLORIDAS SEGMENTAL BRIDGES The Long Key Bridge was the first used only on straight structures, over precast segmental bridge constructed in water with spans between 118 and 143 ft Florida; since then, a total of 31 bridges (36 and 44 m). For larger spans up to 225 have been built, including the cable ft (69 m) and especially for curved inter- stayed Sunshine Skyway Bridge over change viaducts on land sites, balanced Tampa Bay (Fig. 9). Several more have cantilever has been used. been and are being designed. (The Sun- Substructure and foundation types shine Skyway is an exceptional structure follow a similar trend, with lighter pre- in its own right and will not be dis- cast and cast-in-place substructures in cussed in detail here. However, certain span-by-span applications, as opposed information and experience from the to more massive cast-in-place substruc- Skyway project have been incor- tures required by balanced cantilever porated — particularly that which per- construction. The difference arises from tains to the high level span-by-span ap- the span lengths and the fact that proaches which are typical of other cantilever construction usually requires segmental, rather than cable stayed, significant out-of-balance erection ef- construction. Also, the Sunshine Sky- fects be carried into the foundations. way
Recommended publications
  • Review on Applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 05 | May-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Review on applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof. P. J. Salunke2 1Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India 2Head, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - This paper gives a brief introduction to the 1874. Use of steel led to the development of cantilever cantilever bridges and its evolution. Further in cantilever bridges. The world’s longest span cantilever bridge was built bridges it focuses on system and construction of balanced in 1917 at Quebec over St. Lawrence River with main span of cantilever bridges. The superstructure forms the dynamic 549 m. India can boast of one such long bridge, the Howrah element as a load carrying capacity. As box girders are widely bridge, over river Hooghly with main span of 457 m which is used in forming the superstructure of balanced cantilever fourth largest of its kind. bridges, its advantages are discussed and a detailed review is carried out. Concrete cantilever construction was first introduced in Europe in early 1950’s and it has since been broadly used in design and construction of several bridges. Unlike various Key Words: Bridge, Balanced Cantilever, Superstructure, bridges built in Germany using cast-in-situ method, Box Girder, Pre-stressing cantilever construction in France took a different direction, emphasizing the use of precast segments. The various advantages of precast segments over cast-in-situ are: 1. INTRODUCTION i. Precast segment construction method is a faster method compared to cast-in-situ construction method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2016 The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics Teddy Mulamba University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Mulamba, Teddy, "The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics" (2016). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 714. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/714 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2016 All Rights Reserved THE INFLUENCE OF SEA-LEVEL RISE ON SALINITY IN THE LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER AND THE ASSOCIATED PHYSICS by Teddy Mulamba A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION December, 2016 Unpublished work c Teddy Mulamba The Thesis titled "Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in The Lower St Johns River and The Associated Physics" is approved: ___________________________ _______________________ Dr. Don T. Resio, PhD ______________________________ _______________________ Dr. Peter Bacopoulos, PhD __________________________ _______________________ Dr. William Dally, PhD, PE Accepted for the School of Engineering: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W
    Policy Study 401 February 2012 Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and pro- moting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Acknowledgement This project was supported by a grant to Reason Foundation from Associated Industries of Florida. The analysis, findings and recommendations in this report are entirely those of the authors. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? By Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Executive Summary The 2011 Florida legislative session saw several proposals that would have consolidated some or all of the local toll authorities into the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE).
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee Michael Maurino Monday, October 19, 2020 @ 1:30 PM Planning Commission
    Commissioner The County Center and Plan Hillsborough offices are closed to the public in response Lesley “Les” Miller, Jr. Hillsborough County to the COVID-19 pandemic. Members of the public may access this meeting and MPO Chairman participate via the GoToMeeting link above, or by phoning in and visiting the Plan Commissioner Pat Kemp Hillsborough website for the agenda packet and presentation slides. Please mute Hillsborough County MPO Vice Chair yourself upon joining the meeting. For technical support during the meeting, please Paul Anderson contact Jason Krzyzanowski at (813) 273-3774 ext. 327. Port Tampa Bay Councilman Joseph Citro City of Tampa Virtual Meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee Michael Maurino Monday, October 19, 2020 @ 1:30 PM Planning Commission Commissioner Ken Hagan Hillsborough County To view presentations and participate your computer, table or smartphone: Mayor Andrew Ross City of Temple Terrace https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4217036520846369549 Joe Lopano Hillsborough County Aviation Authority Register in advance to receive your personalized link, which can be saved to your Mayor Rick A. Lott calendar. City of Plant City Councilman Guido Maniscalco Dial in LISTEN-ONLY MODE: 1-914-614-3221 Access Code: 505-461-299 City of Tampa Adam Harden Agenda packet, presentations, and supplemental materials posted here. HART Commissioner Please mute yourself after joining the conference call to minimize background noise. Kimberly Overman Hillsborough County Commissioner I. Committee Soundcheck 15 minutes prior to meeting Mariella Smith Hillsborough County II. Call to Order Public Comment - 3 minutes per speaker, please Cindy Stuart Hillsborough County Public comments are welcome, and may be given in person at this School Board teleconference meeting, by logging into the website above and clicking the “raise Councilman John Dingfelder City of Tampa hand” button.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges Key Stage 2 Thematic Unit
    Bridges Key Stage 2 Thematic Unit Supporting the Areas of Learning and STEM Contents Section 1 Activity 1 Planning Together 3 Do We Need Activity 2 Do We Really Need Bridges? 4 Bridges? Activity 3 Bridges in the Locality 6 Activity 4 Decision Making: Cantilever City 8 Section 2 Activity 5 Bridge Fact-File 13 Let’s Investigate Activity 6 Classifying Bridges 14 Bridges! Activity 7 Forces: Tension and Compression 16 Activity 8 How Can Shapes Make a Bridge Strong? 18 Section 3 Activity 9 Construction Time! 23 Working with Activity 10 Who Builds Bridges? 25 Bridges Activity 11 Gustave Eiffel: A Famous Engineer 26 Activity 12 Building a Bridge and Thinking Like an Engineer 28 Resources 33 Suggested Additional Resources 60 This Thematic Unit is for teachers of Key Stage 2 children. Schools can decide which year group will use this unit and it should be presented in a manner relevant to the age, ability and interests of the pupils. This Thematic Units sets out a range of teaching and learning activities to support teachers in delivering the objectives of the Northern Ireland Curriculum. It also supports the STEM initiative. Acknowledgement CCEA would like to thank The Institution of Civil Engineers Northern Ireland (ICE NI) for their advice and guidance in the writing of this book. Cover image © Thinkstock Do We Need Bridges? Planning together for the theme. Discovering the reasons for having, and the impact of not having, bridges. Writing a newspaper report about the impact of a missing bridge. Researching bridges in the locality. Grouping and classifying bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701
    Coast Guard, DHS § 100.701 TABLE TO § 100.501—ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 100.501 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983—Continued No. Date Event Sponsor Location 68 .. June 25 and 26, Thunder on the Kent Narrows All waters of Prospect Bay enclosed by the following points: 2011. Narrows. Racing Asso- Latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W., to lati- ciation. tude 38°58′02.0″ N., longitude 076°15′05.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′38.0″ N., longitude 076°15′29.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′28.0″ N., longitude 076°15′23.0″ W., to latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W. [USCG–2007–0147, 73 FR 26009, May 8, 2008, as forbid and control the movement of all amended by USCG–2009–0430, 74 FR 30223, vessels in the regulated area(s). When June 25, 2009; 75 FR 750, Jan. 6, 2010; USCG– hailed or signaled by an official patrol 2011–0368, 76 FR 26605, May 9, 2011] vessel, a vessel in these areas shall im- EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: By USCG–2010–1094, mediately comply with the directions at 76 FR 13886, Mar. 15, 2011, the Table to given. Failure to do so may result in § 100.501 was amended by suspending lines No. expulsion from the area, citation for 13, No. 19, No. 21 and No. 23, and adding a new failure to comply, or both. heading and entries 65, 66, 67, and 68, effec- tive Apr. 1, 2011 through Sept. 1, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Precast Prestressed Segmental Bridges
    An Overview of Precast Prestressed ♦ Segmental Bridges Walter Podolny, Jr. Bridge Division Office of Engineering Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. he seventies will be recorded by Construction in this manner may T engineering historians as the de- also have a serious impact upon envi- cade in which prestressed concrete ronment and ecology. Prestressed segmental bridge construction came of segmental construction has extended age in North America. Segmental box the practical span of concrete bridges girder bridges have attracted the at- to approximately 800 ft (244 m). tention and captured the imagination Where segmental construction is used of bridge engineers and designers in conjunction with the cable-stay across the continent. bridge concept, the span range can be Because of practical limitations of extended to 1300 ft (400 m) and handling and shipping, the precast perhaps longer.' prestressed I-girder type of bridge Because construction of the super- construction is limited to an approxi- structure is executed from above, i.e., mate range of 120 to 150-ft (37 to 46 at deck level, the use of extensive m) spans. Beyond this range of span, falsework is avoided. Thus, there is no post-tensioned cast-in-place box gir- effect upon navigation clearance from ders on falsework are more attractive. falsework during construction and the However, in certain instances the ex- cost of extensive formwork is elimi- tensive use of falsework can prove to nated. Segmental viaduct type bridges be an economic disadvantage. Where provide a method whereby the impact deep ravines or navigable waterways of highway construction through en- must be crossed, extensive formwork vironmentally sensitive areas can be may be impractical.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Turnpike System
    3/15/2016 Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Nicola Liquori, CPA Deputy Executive Director / Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2016 Florida’s Turnpike System Largest toll system in Florida Customer Characteristics Operational Characteristics • 2.5M customers / day • 768M transactions • 61% of population • $866M Revenue • 96% FL Plates • 138 interchanges • 81% SunPass participation • 25 mainline plazas • 8% TOLL‐BY‐PLATE • 600 toll lanes • 2,300 lane miles Florida Department of Transportation 1 3/15/2016 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise GARCON POINT FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY BRIDGE MID-BAY BRIDGE and SPENCE PARKWAY WESTERN BELTWAY, PART C NORTHERN COIN SYSTEM 483 miles SUNCOAST PARKWAY 2 SEMINOLE EXPRESSWAY 28 miles SUNCOAST PARKWAY BEACHLINE EAST EXPESSWAY BEACHLINE WEST EXPESSWAY 511 miles VETERANS EXPRESSWAY TICKET SYSTEM 127 miles I-4 CONNECTOR 18 miles SOUTHERN COIN PINELLAS BAYWAY SYSTEM SYSTEM 656 miles SAWGRASS SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE EXPRESSWAY POLK PARKWAY Florida’s Turnpike 595 EXPRESS Florida’s Turnpike (Future) SOUTHERN CONNECTOR 95 EXPRESS EXTENSION Other FDOT Owned HOMESTEAD EXTENSION Other FDOT Operated ALLIGATOR ALLEY (SR 821) Florida Department of Transportation AET Schedule Open to Traffic: 97 miles already converted Suncoast Parkway 228 miles will be converted Veterans Expressway Ticket System Sawgrass Expressway Southern Coin SR 821 (HEFT) Florida Department of Transportation 2 3/15/2016 Why All‐Electronic Tolling Conversion? • Customer acceptance: Transponder/image based • Video technology • Convenience: No one stops •
    [Show full text]
  • Opponents Blast Report Favoring New Bridge by Caren Herman Tesllmony by So-Called Experts
    > ••&• r So > r Opponents blast report favoring new bridge By Caren Herman tesllmony by so-called experts. It's enough to interest; Staff writer make your hair curl, yei we don't seem to have "All of the testimony that was taken can be Council chambers were packed Tuesday anyone in this city who is knowledgeable looKed at as having some bias. The chairman with residents angry over the city's bridge enough to see through It. It is a sad of the committee is an associate or an~ committee majority report that recommends commentary but unfortunately, that Is the employee of the man who is attempting to immediate ^replacement of the Sanibcl way it is," charged Andy Sclpos. develop.;.the last undeveloped part of the Causeway. .__. island." I-iljequisl said. • " Speaker after speaker said city council See letter from bridge committee 'The person heading the committee is "stacked" the committee with people in favor associated with development and may stand of the bridge; they questioned the integrity of ^ members on Page 40 to gain from further .development," he said, experts who testified and claimed those John Uljequist, who sough! but did not attacking bridge committee chairman Joe experts, and committee members, all had receive an appointment on the committee, Bums. ' " • ~ •' ulterior motives and something to Rain from a said Ihe hearings were not necessarily "above "I am going to Mke that real personally," new bridge. * admonished Mayor Jerry Mucnch, calling board and fair." Both experts and some Liljequist's barrage on Burns a "low blow." 'Never in my -10 years of engineering committee members would benefit from a new experience have I heard so much misleading bridge, providing for Inherent conflicts of •please see page 8A FEBRUARY 23,1990 VOLUME 18 = NUMBER 15 ' • ' 3 SECTIONS, 56 PAGES SANIBEL AND CAPTIVA, FLORIDA Where's the sand? Captiva'sncwjettylsohe " suspect in higher erosion • on Northern Sanibel shore Dr MAX Frledersdorf ABC Sale Capliva Memorial Library and an island starts" scholarship fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Feasibility Study Discussion Interviews
    Downtown Feasibility Study Discussion Interviews 2 ¤ Alex Coley – Hallmark Partners ¤ Nathaniel Ford Sr. – Jacksonville Transporta4on ¤ Brad Thoburn – Jacksonville Transporta4on Authority Authority ¤ Paul Astleford – Visit Jacksonville ¤ Burnell Goldman – Omni Hotel ¤ Paul Crawford – City of Jacksonville ¤ Calvin Burney – City of Jacksonville ¤ Peter Rummell – Rummell Company ¤ Dan King – Hya< Regency Hotel ¤ Robert Selton – Colliers Interna4onal ¤ Elaine Spencer – City of Jacksonville ¤ Robert White – Sleiman Enterprises ¤ Ivan Mitchell - Jacksonville Transporta4on ¤ Roger Postlewaite – GreenPointe Communi4es, Authority LLC ¤ Jason Ryals – Colliers Interna4onal ¤ Steve Atkins – SouthEast Group ¤ Jeanne Miller – Jacksonville Civic Council ¤ Ted Carter – City of Jacksonville ¤ Jerry Mallot – Jacksonville Chamber ¤ Tera Meeks – Department of Parks and Recrea4on ¤ Jim Zsebok - Stache Investment Corpora4on ¤ Terry Lorince – Downtown Vision ¤ Keith Brown – Jacksonville Transporta4on ¤ Toney Sleiman – Sleiman Enterprises Authority ¤ Michael Balanky – Chase Properes Overview 3 Downtown Jacksonville 1. Build off of the City of Jacksonville’s strengths 2. Focus on features that cannot be replicated. CompeRRve advantages that only Downtown can offer: a. beauRful historic architecture b. the region’s most prized aracRons and entertainment venues c. the opportunity to create populaon density d. neighborhoods with character and an intown style of living e. The most obvious – the St. Johns River bisecRng the core of the City and creang not one, but two opportuniRes for riverfront development 3. Significant daily counts: a. Mathews Bridge/Arlington Expressway – 66,500 vehicles per day b. Hart Bridge/Route 1 – 42,000 vehicles per day c. Main Street Bridge/Highway 10 – 30,500 vehicles per day d. Acosta Bridge/Acosta Expressway – 28,500 vehicles per day e. Fuller T. Warren Bridge/I-95 – 121,000 vehicles per day Riverfront Activation 4 Riverfront Ac7va7on Jacksonville must create a world-class riverfront to aract the region and naonal visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice
    State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice The following Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy bonds. It is marked with a dated date and speaks only as of that date, which may be prior to the date the Official Statement was posted on this website. The Division of Bond Finance undertakes no obligation to update any information included therein except for certain annual and periodic reports which may be found on the EMMA website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. This Official Statement may be removed from the website at any time. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion in the Official Statement are subject to change without notice and the posting of the Official Statement on this website does not imply that there has been no change in such information or the affairs of the State of Florida since the dated date of the Official Statement or date of posting such Official Statement. New Issue - Book-Entry Only This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information about the 2019A Bonds. Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the reader. To make an informed decision, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in Appendix A. $86,640,000 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Transportation Sunshine Skyway Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on the inside front cover Bond Ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Over Jones Falls. This Bridge Was Originally No
    The same eastbound movement from Rockland crosses Bridge 1.19 (miles west of Hollins) over Jones Falls. This bridge was originally no. 1 on the Green Spring Branch in the Northern Central numbering scheme. PHOTO BY MARTIN K VAN HORN, MARCH 1961 /COLLECTION OF ROBERT L. WILLIAMS. On October 21, 1959, the Interstate Commerce maximum extent. William Gill, later involved in the Commission gave notice in its Finance Docket No. streetcar museum at Lake Roland, worked on the 20678 that the Green Spring track west of Rockland scrapping of the upper branch and said his boss kept would be abandoned on December 18, 1959. This did saying; "Where's all the steel?" Another Baltimore not really affect any operations on the Green Spring railfan, Mark Topper, worked for Phillips on the Branch. Infrequently, a locomotive and a boxcar would removal of the bridge over Park Heights Avenue as a continue to make the trip from Hollins to the Rockland teenager for a summer job. By the autumn of 1960, Team Track and return. the track through the valley was just a sad but fond No train was dispatched to pull the rail from the memory. Green Spring Valley. The steel was sold in place to the The operation between Hollins and Rockland con- scrapper, the Phillips Construction Company of tinued for another 11/2 years and then just faded away. Timonium, and their crews worked from trucks on ad- So far as is known, no formal abandonment procedure jacent roads. Apparently, Phillips based their bid for was carried out, and no permission to abandon was the job on old charts that showed the trackage at its ' obtained.
    [Show full text]