DOCSLIB.ORG

Waiohau C26 Ruatoki

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waiohau C26 Ruatoki C'L Waiohau C26 Ruatoki By Sharyn Green Waitangi Tribunal research series 1993/7 This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal for the Waiohau C26 claim, Wai 247. Any conclusions drawn or opinions expressed are those of the author. Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Wellington 1993 This report may be cited as 1993 WTRS/7 ISSN 1172-2509 ISBN 0-908810-25-3 Crown copyright 1993 First published 1993 by the Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice POBox 5022 Wellington New Zealand 1 Introduction My name is Sharyn Green (Ngati Maniapoto) and I am employed by the Waitangi Tribunal Division. I completed my Bachelor of Laws at the Dunedin, in 1991. While at the university I tutored Maori language for the Maori Studies Department and completed part of a Maori Studies degree. I was admitted to the bar as a barrister and solicitor in October 1992. I was commissioned to prepare this exploratory report for the Waitangi Tribunal in May 1992. This claim concerns the acquisition of part Waiohau C26 by the Ministry of Works (MoW) under the provisions of the Public Works Act 1928. Almost all of the information for this report was supplied by Bill Patrick, retired former Registrar of the Maori Land Court for the Waiariki region prior to his retiring. Mr Patrick collated his information from MoW files, Maori Land Court files and Maori Trust Office files. This report is concerned with Waiohau C26 from the time it was acquired by the Crown in 1961. At the time that the block was taken, it was included in the Ruatoki development scheme. Information concerning how the block came to be included in the scheme has largely been omitted. The scheme is mostly discussed in the context of the Department of Maori Affair's conduct at the time that the land was taken for the public work. 2 Location Waiohau C26 consisted of an area of 47 acres prior to the Crown's acquisition for a power supply. 1 The block is in the Bay of Plenty region and is located on the Galatea - Te Teko road, 27 kilometres south of Te Teko. As at 1984 the land still had several scraped out areas from the metal extraction with poor pasture and some gorse and fern. On the northern boundary the land falls slightly down to the Waihua stream. 2 3 The Claim and Claimants A former owner of the block, Kaari Waaka, lodged a claim with the Waitangi Tribunal on 10 August 1987.3 Kaari Waaka was one of ten shareholders listed on Particulars of title issued from the Waiariki District Maori Land Court, 7 July 1961; document bank (db) p13 2 Valuation Department appraisal, 21 February 1984: db p39 3 Correspondence from counsel acting for claimant; appendix 1 1 Waitangi Tribunal Research Series: Waiohau C26 the particulars of title for Waiohau C26 while the land was part of the development scheme. Kaari Waaka's share was lout of a total of 22.45. Ani Heni and Huka Hiki held the majority shareholding between them: 15.15.4 The claim was registered as Wai 247 by a Waitangi Tribunal direction on 11 November 1991.5 The claimant alleges that the taking of the block by proclamation, rather than paying royalties for the metal extracted, was a dishonourable action by the Crown and to the detriment of the owners because: • the Crown should have negotiated with the former owners to extract metal from the land at an agreed price, • the value of the metal taken far exceeded the amount paid in compensation for the acquisition of the land, • the Crown took more land than was necessary, and • the Crown has made no effort to restore the land to its former condition. For the above reasons the former owners (the claimants) ask that the tribunal recommend that the Crown offer back the land without payment by them of any consideration. 6 4 Waiohau C25 The postscript to this report will concern part Waiohau C25, since the Crown's offer to return Waiohau C26 to the former owners for $20, 000 includes a small portion of Waiohau C25 (which lies adjacent to Waiohau C26). Part of Waiohau C25 is being offered as a package deal to the former owners of Waiohau C26 since the stream which runs through both these blocks would form a natural boundary between the two rather than one being land-locked (see block plan in appendix 3).7 4 Particulars of title (see footnote 1) 5 Memorandum - directions of the Waitangi Tribunal; appendix 2 6 ibid 7 MoW memorandum to the Maori Land Court, 24 July 1984; db p31 2 Waitangi Tribunal Research Series: Waiohau C26 5 The Acquisition of Waiohau C26 On 18 May 1933 parts of Waiohau C26 were included in the Ruatoki development scheme. 8 Waiohau C25 was also included in this development scheme at this time. The MoW wrote to the Maori Land Court inquiring as to the status and ownership of the block. The court replied on 7 July 1962. At this time the block was in the Ruatoki development scheme and therefore subject to Part XXIV of the Maori Affairs Act 1953. Since the land had not been developed however, the deputy registrar of the court said that the Department of Maori Affairs was prepared to release the land from inclusion in the scheme.9 The MoW replied to the Maori Land Court on 12 July 1961 asking if royalties should be paid since concrete aggregate was required from Waiohau C25. The deputy registrar was also asked to advise whether the MoW would have to back fill the area "taken".l0 The Maori Land Court advised the ministry that it should either negotiate with the owners for a licence, or take the part of the land where the metal was situatedY It appears that the ministry was given this advice based on the premise that the land would be released from Part XXIV, (the development scheme provisions), since the Maori Land Board would normally represent owners while their land is subject to Part XXIV. The deputy registrar did advise the ministry that in the event that the ministry wished to negotiate for a licence, there would need to be a meeting of owners called, and if a resolution passed at the meeting, the Maori Land Court would still need to confirm it. It was said that "the owners and the court would determine the terms of the licence. ,,12 The District Commissioner of Works instructed the project engineer at Te Mahoe on 18 August 1961 to serve notice under s17 of the Public Works Act 1928. s17 is 8 New Zealand Gazette, 18 May 1933, No.37 p1373; db p32. By this notice, 65a Or Op and 560a 1r 30p of Waiohau 1A1D1 and 1A1D2 respectively were included in the scheme. A consolidation order issued by the Maori Land Court on 1 October 1936 named the former Waiohau 1A1D1 and 1A1D2, Waiohau C26 and named the 10 owners of the block in a schedule of owners, see db p75 9 Letter from the Deputy Registrar of the Maori Land Court, Rotorua, to the MoW, Matahina, 7 July 1961; db p12 10 Letter from the MoW to the Maori Land Court, Rotorua, 12 July 1961; db p14 11 Letter from the Deputy Registrar of the Maori Land Court, Rotorua, to the MoW, Te Mahoe, 21 July 1961; db p15 12 ibid 3 Waitangi Tribunal Research Series: Waiohau C26 discussed below but briefly it provided the Crown with two powers where natural material existed in land and that material was desired by the Crown for public works. The Crown could either take land which had material existing in it or it could serve notice upon the owners/occupiers of the block stating that the land will be entered upon after 24 hours for the extraction of the material. It is unclear from the district commissioner's instructions which option the ministry intended at that time. It was instructed however that there be no mention of an award of royalties to the owners. 13 It can be shown that the acquisition of the land, rather than the paying of royalties, was a cheaper option for the Crown. A letter from the project engineer to the district commissioner gives an estimated royalty of one pound per hundred cubic yards. The same letter says 140,000 cubic yards of concrete aggregate was required for the Matahina power project. Based on this assumption, approximately 1,400 pounds in royalties would have been due to the owners. 14 The Crown paid 420 pounds for the acquisition of Waiohau C26. On 15 November 1961 Maori Affairs authorised the MoW to enter upon Waiohau C26 in anticipation of the MOW taking it by proclamation.15 On 16 August 1962, 46a 3r lOp of Waiohau C26 and 2a 3r 3p of Waiohau C25 were taken by proclamation for the Rangitaiki river power scheme, (the Matahina dam).16 The Maori Land Court sat on 16 October 1962 to determine the award of compensation to the owners. The court awarded £440 compensation.17 No owners were present at the court sitting. 18 A valuation of those parts of Waiohau C26 and Waiohau C25 that were taken valued the C26 area at £420. 19 Waiohau C26 had been occupied for most of the year so the court awarded £20 compensation for loss 13 Letter form the District Commissioner of Works, Hamilton to the project engineer, Te Mahoe, 18 August 1961; db p16 14 Letter from the project engineer at Te Mahoe to the District Commissioner of Works, Hamilton, 21 August 1961; db p17 15 Copy of letter from the Department of Maori Affairs to the Ministry of Works 15 November 1961; db p20 16 New Zealand Gazette, 23 August 1962 No.53 p1370; db p34 17 Whakatane minute book, 16 October 1962, vol 36 p287; db p35 18 ibid 19 Valuation Department appraisal,12 September 1962; db p36 4 Waitangi Tribunal Research Series: Waiohau C26 of occupation and £420 for the taking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Direction Identification of Influences on the Whakatane District
    IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENCES ON THE WHAKATANE DISTRICT SECTION 1 - STRATEGIC DIRECTION IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENCES ON THE WHAKATANE DISTRICT BACKGROUND on decisions made in a global environment, the Council additional compliance costs associated with meeting has a responsibility to ensure we retain the ongoing higher drinking water standards. Government policy will The Council’s plans and work programmes over the sustainability of our communities. Internet access impact on the Council, what it does, and the relative cost next ten years are targeted to meet the future needs enables increased visibility of the Whakatane District of the provision of services. These impacts need to be of the District. To do this successfully, it is important to to the rest of the world and to enable those who live managed. understand what will influence change in our district and here, access to increased knowledge, people in other In a country that is increasingly urbanised, the “one the elements of change that can be influenced by the countries, lifestyle choices and to goods and services. Council so that our communities can achieve their aims size fits all” approach does not necessarily benefit and aspirations for the future. NATIONAL IMPACTS our communities which make up some of the most socio-economically deprived areas of New Zealand. While the LTCCP 2009-2019 has a 10 year time horizon, A three-year electoral system leads to uncertainty around Our Council needs to be well placed and resourced many of the programmes and budgets have a longer the stability of policy decisions and the continuation to advocate for our communities and to ensure that it term focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Nan's Stories
    BYRON RANGIWAI Nan’s Stories Introduction This paper explores some of the many stories that my grandmother, Rēpora Marion Brown—Nan, told me when growing up and throughout my adult life. Nan was born at Waiōhau in 1940 and died at her home at Murupara in 2017. Nan was married to Papa— Edward Tapuirikawa Brown. Nan and Papa lived on Kōwhai Avenue in Murupara. Nan’s parents were Koro Ted (Hāpurona Edward (Ted) Maki Nātana) and Nanny Pare (Pare Koekoeā Rikiriki). Koro Ted and Nanny Pare lived around the corner from her on Miro Drive. My sister and I were raised on the same street as my great-grandparents, just six or seven houses away. I could see Koro Ted’s house— located on a slight hill—from my bedroom window. Byron Rangiwai is a Lecturer in the Master of Applied Indigenous Knowledge programme in Māngere. 2 Nan’s Stories Figure 1. Koro Ted and Nanny Pare (see Figure 2; B. Rangiwai, personal collection) Koura and Patuheuheu Nan often talked about her Patuheuheu hapū and her ancestor, Koura (see Figure 2). In a battle between Ngāti Rongo and Ngāti Awa, Koura’s mokopuna was killed. (Rangiwai, 2018). To memorialise this tragedy, a section of Ngāti Rongo was renamed, Patuheuheu (Rangiwai, 2018, 2021b). Te Kaharoa, vol. 14, 2021, ISSN 1178-6035 Nan’s Stories 3 Figure 2. Whakapapa Koura was a Ngāti Rongo and Patuheuheu chief who resided at Horomanga in the 1830s and was closely connected with Ngāti Manawa (Mead & Phillis, 1982; Waitangi Tribunal, 2002). Local history maintains that Koura was responsible for upholding and retaining the mana of Tūhoe in the Te Whaiti, Murupara, Horomanga, Te Houhi and Waiōhau areas (Rangiwai, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the TUARARANGAIA BLOCKS Wai894 #A3 Wai36 #A22 Wai 726 #A4
    A HISTORY OF THE TUARARANGAIA BLOCKS Wai894 #A3 Wai36 #A22 Wai 726 #A4 PETER CLAYWORTH A REPORT COMMISSIONED BY THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL MAY 2001 CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS ....................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 8 i.i Claims relating to the Tuararangaia blocks ...................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1: THE TUARARANGAIA BLOCK: TE WHENUA, TE TANGATA ....... 16 1.1 Te Whenua, Te Ngahere ................................................................................................. 16 1.2 Early occupation and resource uses ................................................................................ 19 1.3 Hapu and iwi associated with Tuararangaia ................................................................... 22 1.3.1 Ngati Awa ................................................................................................................. 22 1.3.2 Ngati Pukeko ............................................................................................................. 23 1.3.3 Warahoe .................................................................................................................... 24 1.3.4 Ngati Hamua ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part B: Community Property 12 MARCH 2018
    ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Part B: Community Property 12 MARCH 2018 whakatane.govt.nz Community Property - Asset Management Plan Part B – Community Property 2018 Draft Asset Management Plan Part B – Community Property 2018-28 Part B provides the specific Asset Management information for Community Property, for the period 2018-2028. X[A1228573] 2018-2028 Asset management Plan Page 1 of 66 Community Property - Contents Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1 Asset Management Plan – Part A ................................................................................................ 7 2 Asset Management Plan – Part B ................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1 The Assets This Plan Covers ........................................................................................................ 8 Business Overview .................................................................................................................................. 9 1 Why we do it ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki
    Bay of Plenty Regional Council Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki Bay of Plenty Regional Council Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki Prepared By Opus International Consultants Ltd Peter Askey Whakatane Office Principal Environmental Engineer Level 1, Opus House, 13 Louvain Street PO Box 800, Whakatane 3158 New Zealand Reviewed By Telephone: +64 7 308 0139 Jack McConchie Facsimile: +64 7 308 4757 Principal Hydrologist Date: 30rd November 2017 Reference: 2-34346.00 Status: Issue 2 © Opus International Consultants Ltd 2017 Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki i Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Key Issues .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Land ownership ................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Resource Consents ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Lake Aniwaniwa and the Rangitaiki River .......................................................... 5 2.1 Lake Accretion Rates ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6118 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 228
    6118 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 228 2. The Whakatane District Council's proposed classification of The Road Classification (New Plymouth City) the roads as set out in the Schedule is approved. Notice No. 1, 1987 3. The Road Classification (Whakatane District) Notice No. 1, Pursuant to Regulation 3 (8) of the Heavy Motor Vehicle 1987, signed the 9th day of November 1987*, issued pursuant Regulations 197 4 and a delegation from the Secretary for to Regulation 3 of the Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1974, Transport, I, Carne Maurice Clissold, Chief Traffic Engineer, which relates to the roads described in the Schedule, is give the following notice: revoked. Notice Schedule 1. This notice may be cited as the Road Classification (New Whakatane District Plymouth City) Notice No. 1, 1987. Roads Classified in Class One. 2. The New Plymouth City Council's proposed classification of the roads as set out in the Schedule is approved. All roads within the urban areas of Whakatane, Edgecumbe, Matata, Ohope, Taneatua, Te Teko and Waimana. Schedule Arawa Road. Roads Classified in Class One Awaiti South Road: from Hallet Road to Matata Road. All roads or parts of roads under the control of New Plymouth City. Awakeri Road: from Awakeri to Edgecumbe. Signed at Wellington this 9th day of December 1987. East Bank Road: from No. 2 State Highway (Pokeno to Wellington via Gisborne) to Edgecumbe. C. M. CLISSOLD, Chief Traffic Engineer. Foster Road: from White Pine Bush Road to Grace Road. (MOT. 28/8/New Plymouth City) lnl940 Galatea Road: from No. 30 State Highway (Te Kuiti to Whakatane via Atiamuri) to Whirinaki Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Kawerau Geothermal System Management Plan
    KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN February 2018 Prepared in Collaboration with Executive Summary The Kawerau Geothermal System is located to the north-east of Kawerau within the Bay of Plenty Region, and partially underlies the township of Kawerau. It has been substantially developed for industrial purposes pursuant to resource consents granted by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council (BOPRC) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). This includes geothermal energy being used for electricity generation, industrial processes (direct heat) and cultural purposes. Bay of Plenty Regional Council has functions under Section 30 of the RMA for the management of geothermal resources. The Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement (RPS) requires the preparation of a System Management Plan (SMP) for the Kawerau Geothermal System as a key part of the way in which BOPRC intends to manage the Kawerau Geothermal System. This SMP has been prepared in collaboration with the four consent holders authorised to take more than 1,000 tonnes per day of geothermal fluid from the Kawerau Geothermal System, being: Mercury NZ Limited, Ngāti Tūwharetoa Geothermal Assets Limited, Geothermal Developments Ltd, and Te Ahi O Māui Partnership. Engagement has also been undertaken with tangata whenua and interested and potentially affected parties, including industrial operators using the geothermal resource. The purpose of this SMP is to ensure that the Kawerau Geothermal System is managed in a sustainable manner in accordance with the requirements of the RMA and the relevant policy and planning documents prepared under the RMA. The content anticipated in an SMP is set out in Policy GR7B of the RPS and includes objectives for its overall management and strategies to achieve the objectives The SMP is a non-statutory document and will be periodically reviewed and updated to ensure that it remains relevant and fit for purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Hau Ora O Nga Kaumatua O Tuhoe
    Te Hau Ora o Nga Kaumatua o Tuhoe A Study of Tuhoe Kaumatua Mental Wellness Hinematau McNeill (2005) A thesis submitted to the Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Karakia TURUKI WHAKATAHA E Io Matua Kore Heke iho koe Pou ki te whenua Ko Papatuanuku Te aitanga a Maui-tikitiki a Taranga Ka puta ko te uwha Ka puta nga kaupapa katoa O tona Ao He Mauri He Mana He Ihi He Tapu Ka puta ko te ira tangata Ka whakamaua kia tina! Ui e Taiki e! 2 Mihi Tena koutou hai nga mahuetanga iho Mai i nga tihi tapu o o koutou maunga koawaawa Waihoki e heke ana ki tena ngutu awa ki tena ngutu awa Koutou nga kanohi ora o o koutou matua Ka heke ki te taheke-roa e kore e hokia He kohikohinga mahara ki nga tikanga taonga a kui a koro ma Ratau ka whakangangaiore ki te whakaata ake i roto o te mahara Hai morimori ma nga whakatipu reanga Kai te haere ake e kore ai e ngaro E memeha ano i te tirohanga kanohi Waiho i konei te kai-ngakau Ki te tangata mate Kia purua ko te moko Kia whakamaua kia tina Haumi e Ui e Taiki e! 3 Table of Contents Karakia ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Mihi ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Attestation of Authorship .......................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Chronology, Structure and Thermal History of the Kawerau Geothermal Field
    Aspects of the Chronology, Structure and Thermal History of the Kawerau Geothermal Field By Sarah Dawn Milicich A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology Victoria University of Wellington School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences Wellington, New Zealand 2013 ii „It is what it is‟ id est quod est J.L. Wooden (pers. comm. 2010) iii iv ABSTRACT The development and management of high-temperature geothermal resources for electrical power generation requires accurate knowledge of the local geological conditions, particularly where they impact on the hydrology of the resource. This study is an integrated programme of work designed to develop new perspectives on the geological and structural framework of the Kawerau geothermal resource as a sound basis for field management. Although the geological approaches and techniques utilised in this study have previously been used, their application to an integrated study of a geothermal system in New Zealand has not been previously undertaken. Correlating volcanic and sedimentary stratigraphy in geothermal areas in New Zealand can be challenging due to similarities in lithology and the destruction of distinctive chemical, mineralogical and textural characteristic by hydrothermal alteration. A means to overcoming these issues is to utilise dating to correlate the stratigraphy. Zircons are resistant to the effects of typical hydrothermal conditions and were dated using SIMS techniques (SHRIMP-RG) to retrieve U–Pb ages on zircons. These age data were then used to correlate units across the field, in part aided by correlations to material that had previously been dated from fresh rock by 40Ar/39Ar techniques, and used to redefine the stratigraphic framework for the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustpower-Soe-Greg-Ryder.Pdf
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan Change 9 to the Bay of Plenty Regional Natural Resources Plan AND submissions and further submissions by Trustpower Limited STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF GREGORY IAN RYDER Evidence of G. I. Ryder 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 My full name is Gregory Ian Ryder. 1.2 I hold BSc. (First Class Honours) (1984) and PhD. (1989) degrees in Zoology from the University of Otago. For both my honours dissertation and PhD. thesis I studied stream ecology with particular emphasis on sedimentation and benthic macroinvertebrates. 1.3 I am a member of the following professional societies: (a) New Zealand Freshwater Society; (b) Royal Society of New Zealand; (c) Society for Freshwater Science (North America). 1.4 I am a Director and Environmental Scientist at Ryder Environmental Limited (Ryder) and have worked as a consultant for approximately 25 years. I work largely in the field of surface water quality and aquatic ecology. I also fulfil the role of an independent commissioner and have sat on over 25 resource consent hearings. 1.5 I have undertaken or been associated with a large number of investigations that have assessed the effects of abstractions and discharges on surface water ecosystems, the effects of existing and proposed impoundments, and the effects of land use activities that produce point source and non-point source discharges. 1.6 My work covers the whole of New Zealand. Private industries, utility companies, local and regional councils and government departments engage me to provide advice on a wide range of issues affecting surface waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Wairua Kōmingomingo O Te Māori = the Spiritual Whirlwind of the Māori
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. TE WAIRUA KŌMINGOMINGO O TE MĀORI THE SPIRITUAL WHIRLWIND OF THE MĀORI A thesis presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Māori Studies Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand Te Waaka Melbourne 2011 Abstract This thesis examines Māori spirituality reflected in the customary words Te Wairua Kōmingomingo o te Maori. Within these words Te Wairua Kōmingomingo o te Māori; the past and present creates the dialogue sources of Māori understandings of its spirituality formed as it were to the intellect of Māori land, language, and the universe. This is especially exemplified within the confinements of the marae, a place to create new ongoing spiritual synergies and evolving dialogues for Māori. The marae is the basis for meaningful cultural epistemological tikanga Māori customs and traditions which is revered. Marae throughout Aotearoa is of course the preservation of the cultural and intellectual rights of what Māori hold as mana (prestige), tapu (sacred), ihi (essence) and wehi (respect) – their tino rangatiratanga (sovereignty). This thesis therefore argues that while Christianity has taken a strong hold on Māori spirituality in the circumstances we find ourselves, never-the-less, the customary, and traditional sources of the marae continue to breath life into Māori. This thesis also points to the arrival of the Church Missionary Society which impacted greatly on Māori society and accelerated the advancement of colonisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Bay of Plenty Primary Schools Athletics Champs Results 2017
    Eastern Bay of Plenty Primary Schools Athletics Champs Results 2017 9 Year Old Boys - 100m First Name Last Name School Place Eruera Kohunui Apanui School 1 Stowers Rico St Joseph's Whakatane 2 Kaio Moses James Street School 3 Ngawai Amoamo St Joseph's Catholic Scho 4 9 Year Old Boys - 200m First Name Last Name School Place Stowers Rico St Joseph's Whakatane 1 CJ Paikea Ashbrook School 2 Ryan Somerville Awakeri School 3 Kirk Dalton Allandale School 4 9 Year Old Boys - 60m First Name Last Name School Place Jacob Law St Joseph's Whakatane 1 Romeo Cross Edgecumbe School 2 Te Hau Paeroa Richmond Edgecumbe School 3 Ngawai Amoamo St Joseph's Catholic Scho 4 9 Year Old Boys - Discus First Name Last Name School Place Tawhio Fox-Kaipara Te Kura o Te Teko 1 Lytral Leach Kawerau Putauaki School 2 Christian Williams Opotiki Primary 3 Daimin Hudson Opotiki Primary 4 9 Year Old Boys - High Jump First Name Last Name School Place Kaio Moses James Street School 1 Zayka Ravenswood Kawerau South School 2 Tyler MacEy Apanui School 3 Kyan Edwards Awakeri School 4 9 Year Old Boys - Long Jump First Name Last Name School Place Romeo Cross Edgecumbe School 1 Ngawai Amoamo St Joseph's Catholic Scho 2 Rico Stowers St Joseph's Whakatane 3 Aydan Hall Otakiri School 4 9 Year Old Boys - Shot Put First Name Last Name School Place Hare Takarangi-Tawhai Kawerau Putauaki School 1 CJ Paikea Ashbrook School 2 Kingstyn Te Naiti Te Kura O Te Paroa 3 Zayka Ravenswood Kawerau South School 4 9 Year Old Boys - Vortex Eastern Bay of Plenty Primary Schools Athletics Champs Results
    [Show full text]