MED C-LIVE Transcript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MED C-LIVE Transcript JUNE 2020 Mario Capecchi, Ph.D. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Michael Keel My name is Michael Keel from New Jersey. And it is my honor to introduce Dr. Mario Capecchi. Dr. Capecchi is the Distinguished Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Utah School of Medicine. He is best known for his groundbreaking work in gene targeting, in mass embryo derived stem cells. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for Medicine, for his work in finding ways to manipulate the mammalian genome by changing mammals’ genes. His research interests include analysis of neural development in mammals, gene therapy, and production of murine models of human genetic diseases, from cancer to neuropsychiatric disorders. Dr. Capecchi, welcome to the Congress of Future Medical Leaders. Dr. Capecchi Thank you. First of all, welcome to the Medical Leaders’ Congress. It's a pleasure to be here. My name is Mario. I'm going to be talking about gene targeting. Next slide please. My laboratory has developed a technology called gene targeting that allows you to change any gene in any conceivable manner in a living creature, such as a mouse. Next slide. Why do we do gene targeting? Next slide. There are many reasons, but they boil down to two. One is basic research and the other is applied research. In basic research, you investigate the biology of an animal. For example, how do you make a limb or a heart or a brain? Those are basic research questions. The other is applied research. That is we can use gene targeting to generate mice with human diseases. Next slide please. There are over 5, 000 human diseases that cause, by single gene defects, that are caused by single gene defects. Next slide. Gene targeting allows us to generate mice, for example, with defined cancers, diabetes or neuropsychiatric disorders. Next slide. We can study disease in mice in much greater detail that is possible in humans for ethical reasons. Next slide please. The disease model can be first used to develop the how, the mechanism of disease starts from beginning to end when it shows the full pathology. Then once you understand the disease, you can use it as a platform to develop new therapies, the exact same mouse. Next slide please. In 1980, I submitted a grant to NIH proposing to develop the targeting intraembryonic cells. Next slide. The project was deemed impossible. Next slide. And the reason they gave for refusing the grant was that the newly introduced DNA that's being introduced into the living cell will never find the same sequence in the genome of a living cell. Since this is the very first step of gene targeting that said the project would not work. Next slide please. So I had two choices. One is to drop the project, or two is to continue the project using funds from another grant. Now the second possibility had enormous risk. Next slide, please. If I failed, I would be finished as a scientist. Imagine trying to get a grant after you've used their money for four years, and you have nothing to show for it. The next grant would be very difficult to ever receive. OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF FUTURE PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL SCIENTISTS © 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 JUNE 2020 However, I chose to go by this second route. Next slide, please. And the reason was the second option, if we were successful, the payoff would be enormous. And so we staked everything on that. Next slide, please. Four years later, we were successful. We could do gene targeting in a mirion cells. Next slide. This was fortunate because grants cover five years of work, but renewal occurs every four years. So you have to renew the grant every four years. And four years later, we had results and we could document that we could do gene targeting. Next slide, please. So I submitted a renewal to the same NIH section that refused the first grant, this time increasing the ante and proposing to do gene targeting not in mammalian cells, but in living mice. And their reply was Next slide, please. We're glad you didn't follow our advice. They have a sense of humor. And from then on, we could pursue it. Next slide, please. Now to understand the targeting, we need to appreciate the essence of DNA. Next slides. This shows you the structure. All of you are familiar with the DNA structure. This shows two DNA strands and they're bound together in a double helix. The red strand and a green strand. And what's holding them together is a ribose phosphate linkage, and then the basis, the information part, are the steps of that helix. Next slide, please. Now, the information content in DNA is the order of basis. And it's an alphabet four letters ATG and C rather than 26 letters. Next slide, please. And this shows you the essence. On the top, you have one strand of DNA, and then two base pairs, and that opposite strand. Okay, so we're looking at just two base pairs. And if there's a T on one strand, then on the other strand you automatically always have an A. Or if you have a C on one strand, on the other strand, you automatically have a G. And the two base pairs are held together by hydrogen bonds, which is shown in red. It's only this configuration of T and A or C and G, that allows the spacing to be exactly the same. And therefore you can construct a stable helix that's present in DNA. So this is everything that we ever do with DNA is dependent on this base pairing. That's the essence. Next slide, please. And this tells us right away how DNA functions to archive information. You simply have one double strand of DNA; they separate and each forms a template for making the opposite strand. And now you've duplicated with precision going from one molecule to two molecules, one mother cell to two daughter cells or one generation to the next generation. And this allows you to transfer the information from one generation to mother and father down to their siblings. Next slide please. Now, Gene tightening takes advantage of a process called homologous recombination. What is homologous recombination? Next slide. The major role of homologous recombination is to repair DNA damage. Next slide. However, at that time, when we started these experiments, that wasn't known. It only became apparent from our own experiments. And that's a separate story, which I don't have time to go into. Next slide, please. Now, in DNA, there are two major grooves, there are two grooves, a big one and a little one. The big one’s called the major groove, and the second one's called the minor groove. Next slide, please. Now, there's enough surface on, revealed on the major groove, to allow a molecular machine to identify which pair is present at any given position without having to separate the strands. So all you have to do is travel along the major groove, and you know exactly what sequence of DNA is through this machinery. Could I have the next slide please. And this homologous recombination return, it does something quite unexpected and magnificent. OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF FUTURE PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL SCIENTISTS © 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 JUNE 2020 When it finds two very long stretches of identical DNA sequence on homologous pairs of chromosomes. Remember, you always have two chromosomes in it for each for your information. It lines up the sequences, and then literally cuts and exchanges the strands with almost perfect precision. This process is shown in the next slide. Here, the top is a double helix, yellow, and then there's a blue one. They actually represent the exact same sequence, but I've covered one yellow, one blue, so you could distinguish them. So the sequence across that region is identical. Every base pair is identical to the other one, okay? Once they're lined up, and that's what the homologous combination does, then it literally cuts and rejoins them. And since we've made them different colors, you can see that they're now joined together with an opposite partner. But what's important is and in the process, it's done with perfection. So now the sequence is still the same from one end to the other on both strands. So it hasn't changed. It simply exchanged partners. Okay? And it's this machinery that we take advantage of, to generate, to do gene targeting. Now, the next slide, please. Okay, so this is what we're going to do. And then the next slide shows the actual mechanism. So here it is, it's very simple. On the top bar is your favorite gene. Okay. It represents, for example, an average gene would have 40, 000 letters. And in the middle of that, we've created this in a test tube. And in the middle of that we make a change and that's the asterisk, the red asterisk. Okay. And that change can be anything. A single base pair. 10 base pairs. A hundred. Thousands. And now we're working on a technology to make it many millions, so we can transfer enormous amounts of information to a single chosen spot on a chromosome. Okay, now, the asterisk is different. But on the sides of that asterisk is a sequence that is identical to what's present in the genome.
Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Albert Lasker Nomination Form
    albert and mary lasker foundation 110 East 42nd Street Suite 1300 New York, ny 10017 November 3, 2003 tel 212 286-0222 fax 212 286-0924 Greetings: www.laskerfoundation.org james w. fordyce On behalf of the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, I invite you to submit a nomination Chairman neen hunt, ed.d. for the 2004 Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards. President mrs. anne b. fordyce The Awards will be offered in three categories: Basic Medical Research, Clinical Medical Vice President Research, and Special Achievement in Medical Science. This is the 59th year of these christopher w. brody Treasurer awards. Since the program was first established in 1944, 68 Lasker Laureates have later w. michael brown Secretary won Nobel Prizes. Additional information on previous Lasker Laureates can be found jordan u. gutterman, m.d. online at our web site http://www.laskerfoundation.org. Representative Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards Program Nominations that have been made in previous years may be updated and resubmitted in purnell w. choppin, m.d. accordance with the instructions on page 2 of this nomination booklet. daniel e. koshland, jr., ph.d. mrs. william mccormick blair, jr. the honorable mark o. hatfied Nominations should be received by the Foundation no later than February 2, 2004. Directors Emeritus A distinguished panel of jurors will select the scientists to be honored. The 2004 Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards will be presented at a luncheon ceremony given by the Foundation in New York City on Friday, October 1, 2004. Sincerely, Joseph L. Goldstein, M.D. Chairman, Awards Jury Albert Lasker Medical Research Awards ALBERT LASKER MEDICAL2004 RESEARCH AWARDS PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AWARDS The major purpose of these Awards is to recognize and honor individuals who have made signifi- cant contributions in basic or clinical research in diseases that are the main cause of death and disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty Years of Fighting Against Cancer in Serbia Ovarian Cancer Vaccine
    News Eighty years of fighting against cancer Recent study by Kunle Odunsi et al., Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, in Serbia New York, USA, showed an effects of vaccine based on NY-ESO-1, a „cancer This year on December 10th, Serbian society for the fight against cancer has testis“ antigen in preventing the recurrence of ovarian cancer. NY-ESO-1 is a ovarian celebrated the great jubilee - 80 years of its foundation. The celebration took „cancer-testis“ antigen expressed in epithelial cancer (EOC) and is place in Crystal Room of Belgrade’s Hyatt hotel, gathering many distinguished among the most immunogenic tumor antigens defined to date. presence + guests from the country and abroad. This remarkable event has been held Author’s previous study point to the role of of intraepithelial CD8 - under the auspices of the President of Republic of Serbia, Mr. Boris Tadić. infiltrating T lymphocytes in tumors that was associated with improved survival of The whole ceremony was presided by Prof. Dr. Slobodan Čikarić, actual presi- patients with the disease. The NY-ESO-1 peptide epitope, ESO157–170, is recog- + + dent of Society, who greeted guests and wished them a warm welcome. Than nized by HLA-DP4-restricted CD4 T cells and HLA-A2- and A24-restricted CD8 + followed the speech of Serbian health minister, Prof. Dr. Tomica Milosavljević T cells. To test whether providing cognate helper CD4 T cells would enhance who pointed out the importance of preventive measures and public education the antitumor immune response, Odunsi et al., conducted a phase I clinical trial along with timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment in global fight of immunization with ESO157–170 mixed with incomplete Freund's adjuvant + against cancer in Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Hox Genes 2
    School ofMedicine Oregon Health Sciences University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This is certify that the Ph.D. thesis of WendyKnosp has been approved Mentor/ Advisor ~ Member Member QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF HOXA13 FUNCTION IN THE DEVELOPING LIMB By Wendy M. lt<nosp A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS X ABSTRACT xii CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 I. Hox genes 2 A. Discovery of Hox genes in Drosophila melanogaster 2 B. Hox cluster colinearity and conservation 7 C. Human Hox mutations 9 D. Hoxa13: HFGS and Guttmacher syndromes 10 II. The Homeodomain 12 A. Homeodomain structure 12 B. DNA binding 14 Ill. Limb development 16 A. Patterning of the limb axes 16 B. Digit formation 20 C. lnterdigital programmed cell death 21 IV. BMPs and limb development 23 A. BMP signaling in the limb 23 B. BMP target genes 27 V. Hoxa13 and embryonic development 30 A. The Hoxa13-GFP mouse model 30 B. Hoxa13 mutant phenotypes 34 C. HOXA 13 homeodomain 35 D. HOXA 13 protein-protein interactions 36 E. HOXA 13 target genes 37 VI. Hypothesis and Rationale 39 CHAPTER 2: HOXA13 regulates Bmp2 and Bmp7 40 I. Abstract 42 II. Introduction 43 Ill. Results 46 IV. Discussion 69 v. Materials and Methods 75 VI. Acknowledgements 83 11 CHAPTER 3: Quantitative analysis of HOXA13 function 84 HOXA 13 regulation of Sostdc1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2, 2001, NIH Record, Vol. LIII, No. 20
    R Still The Second Best Thing About Payday Translating the Histone Code: A H G H L 1,G H T, S Tale of Tails at Stetten Talk Attacks on U.S. Change Life at NIH By Rich McManus By Alison Davis Security Beefed Up News stories appearing over the last year he transition from peacetime's reliable routine to wartime On Campus would have everyone believe that scientists anxiety took place in only minutes as NTH employees came have-once and for all~racked the human Tto work on an otherwise spectacular late summer morning genetic code. Indeed, two teams of 50th Anniversary Sept. 11 and scientists have already published a draft For NINOS, NIMH discovered by 9:45- sequence of our 3-billion-unit jumble of via office televisions, DNA "letters." But t he task of thoroughly radio, the web, deciphering the code's protein-making phone calls and Grantees Win hallway conversa­ instructions-something our bodies do Lasker Award SEE STETTEN LECTURE, PAGE 2 tions-that terror­ ism on an almost unimaginable scale Kolb To Give was taking place in Pittman Lecture New York City and in the heart of Washington, D.C. Fall Computer The workday froze Courses Offered as workers tuned in to the news-the World Trade Center towers in flames, Flag flies at half-mast in tragedy's wake. Outdoor Film and smoke rising from behind the Old Executive Office buiJding Dr. C. David Allis to give Stetten Lecture. Festival a Big Hit near the White House. Summer Jobs into Permanent Posts In the OD Office of Communications and Public Liaison in Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Prize in Physiology Or Medicine 2007
    PRESS RELEASE 2007-10-08 The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided to award The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2007 jointly to Mario R. Capecchi, Martin J. Evans and Oliver Smithies for their discoveries of “principles for introducing specific gene modifications in mice by the use of embryonic stem cells” SUMMARY This year’s Nobel Laureates have made a series of ground-breaking discoveries concerning embryonic stem cells and DNA recombination in mammals. Their discoveries led to the creation of an immensely powerful technology referred to as gene targeting in mice. It is now being applied to virtually all areas of biomedicine – from basic research to the development of new therapies. Gene targeting is often used to inactivate single genes. Such gene “knockout” experiments have elucidated the roles of numerous genes in embryonic development, adult physiology, aging and disease. To date, more than ten thousand mouse genes (approximately half of the genes in the mammalian genome) have been knocked out. Ongoing international efforts will make “knockout mice” for all genes available within the near future. With gene targeting it is now possible to produce almost any type of DNA modification in the mouse genome, allowing scientists to establish the roles of individual genes in health and disease. Gene targeting has already produced more than five hundred different mouse models of human disorders, including cardiovascular and neuro-degenerative diseases, diabetes and cancer. Modification of genes by homologous recombination Information about the development and function of our bodies throughout life is carried within the DNA. Our DNA is packaged in chromosomes, which occur in pairs – one inherited from the father and one from the mother.
    [Show full text]
  • ILAE Historical Wall02.Indd 10 6/12/09 12:04:44 PM
    2000–2009 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 Tim Hunt Robert Horvitz Sir Peter Mansfi eld Barry Marshall Craig Mello Oliver Smithies Luc Montagnier 2000 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2007 2008 Arvid Carlsson Eric Kandel Sir Paul Nurse John Sulston Richard Axel Robin Warren Mario Capecchi Harald zur Hauser Nobel Prizes 2000000 2001001 2002002 2003003 200404 2006006 2007007 2008008 Paul Greengard Leland Hartwell Sydney Brenner Paul Lauterbur Linda Buck Andrew Fire Sir Martin Evans Françoise Barré-Sinoussi in Medicine and Physiology 2000 1st Congress of the Latin American Region – in Santiago 2005 ILAE archives moved to Zurich to become publicly available 2000 Zonismide licensed for epilepsy in the US and indexed 2001 Epilepsia changes publishers – to Blackwell 2005 26th International Epilepsy Congress – 2001 Epilepsia introduces on–line submission and reviewing in Paris with 5060 delegates 2001 24th International Epilepsy Congress – in Buenos Aires 2005 Bangladesh, China, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Kazakhstan, Nicaragua, Pakistan, 2001 Launch of phase 2 of the Global Campaign Against Epilepsy Singapore and the United Arab Emirates join the ILAE in Geneva 2005 Epilepsy Atlas published under the auspices of the Global 2001 Albania, Armenia, Arzerbaijan, Estonia, Honduras, Jamaica, Campaign Against Epilepsy Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, Lebanon, Malta, Malaysia, Nepal , Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Senegal, Syria, South Korea and Zimbabwe 2006 1st regional vice–president is elected – from the Asian and join the ILAE, making a total of 81 chapters Oceanian Region
    [Show full text]
  • Lasker Interactive Research Nom'18.Indd
    THE 2018 LASKER MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARDS Nomination Packet albert and mary lasker foundation November 1, 2017 Greetings: On behalf of the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, I invite you to submit a nomination for the 2018 Lasker Medical Research Awards. Since 1945, the Lasker Awards have recognized the contributions of scientists, physicians, and public citizens who have made major advances in the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of disease. The Medical Research Awards will be offered in three categories in 2018: Basic Research, Clinical Research, and Special Achievement. The Lasker Foundation seeks nominations of outstanding scientists; nominations of women and minorities are encouraged. Nominations that have been made in previous years are not automatically reconsidered. Please see the Nomination Requirements section of this booklet for instructions on updating and resubmitting a nomination. The Foundation accepts electronic submissions. For information on submitting an electronic nomination, please visit www.laskerfoundation.org. Lasker Awards often presage future recognition of the Nobel committee, and they have become known popularly as “America’s Nobels.” Eighty-seven Lasker laureates have received the Nobel Prize, including 40 in the last three decades. Additional information on the Awards Program and on Lasker laureates can be found on our website, www.laskerfoundation.org. A distinguished panel of jurors will select the scientists to be honored with Lasker Medical Research Awards. The 2018 Awards will
    [Show full text]
  • Dna Learning Center
    DNA LEARNING CENTER DNA LEARNING CENTER ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTION MULTIMEDIA David Micklos Scott Bronson Susan Lauter Judy Cumella-Korabik Amanda McBrien Shirley Chan Nancy Daidola Danielle Sixsmith Chun-hua Yang Vin Torti Veronique Bourdeau Susan Conova Elna Carrasco Uwe Hilgert Maureen Cowan We stand at the threshold of a new century with the whole human genome stretched out before us. Messages from science and the popular media suggest a world of seemingly limitless opportunities to improve human health and productivity. Yet, at the turn of the last century, science and society faced a similar rush to exploit human genetics. The story of eugenics—humankind’s first venture into a “gene age”—holds a cautionary lesson for our current preoccupation with genes. Eugenics was the effort to apply principles of genetics to improve the human race. Most people equate eugenics with the atrocities committed for the sake of racial purity in Nazi Germany. Most are unaware of the “positive” eugenics movement, exemplified in England, which advocated voluntary efforts by families to improve their own heredity. Fewer still realize that a coercive, “negative” eugenics movement flourished in the United States, that it involved numerous prominent scientists and civic lead- ers, and that it made its intellectual home at the forerunner of the now prestigious Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. During the first decade of the 20th century, eugenics was organized as a scientific field by the con- fluence of Mendelian genetics and experimental breeding. This synthesis was embodied by Charles Benedict Davenport, who is considered the father of the American eugenics movement. When Charles Da v e n p o r t arrived at Cold Spring Harbor in 1898, he assumed the directorship of The Biological La b o r a t o r y, a prog r essive, if somewhat sleepy, “summer camp” for the study of evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Close to the Edge: Co-Authorship Proximity of Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to Cross-Disciplinary Brokers
    Close to the edge: Co-authorship proximity of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to cross-disciplinary brokers Chris Fields 528 Zinnia Court Sonoma, CA 95476 USA fi[email protected] January 2, 2015 Abstract Between 1991 and 2010, 45 scientists were honored with Nobel prizes in Physiology or Medicine. It is shown that these 45 Nobel laureates are separated, on average, by at most 2.8 co-authorship steps from at least one cross-disciplinary broker, defined as a researcher who has published co-authored papers both in some biomedical discipline and in some non-biomedical discipline. If Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine and their immediate collaborators can be regarded as forming the intuitive “center” of the biomedical sciences, then at least for this 20-year sample of Nobel laureates, the center of the biomedical sciences within the co-authorship graph of all of the sciences is closer to the edges of multiple non-biomedical disciplines than typical biomedical researchers are to each other. Keywords: Biomedicine; Co-authorship graphs; Cross-disciplinary brokerage; Graph cen- trality; Preferential attachment Running head: Proximity of Nobel laureates to cross-disciplinary brokers 1 1 Introduction It is intuitively tempting to visualize scientific disciplines as spheres, with highly produc- tive, well-funded intellectual and political leaders such as Nobel laureates occupying their centers and less productive, less well-funded researchers being increasingly peripheral. As preferential attachment mechanisms as well as the economics of employment tend to give the well-known and well-funded more collaborators than the less well-known and less well- funded (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Retrosight: Understanding the Returns from Cardiovascular And
    WORKING P A P E R Project Retrosight Understanding the returns from cardiovascular and stroke research Case Studies ALEXANDRA POLLITT, STEVEN WOODING, STEPHEN HANNEY, MARTIN BUXTON AND JONATHAN GRANT WR-836-RS March 2011 Prepared on behalf of the Project Retrosight Team Approved for public release, distribution unlimited This product is part of the RAND Europe working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers’ latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND Europe but have not been formally edited or peer reviewed. Unless otherwise indicated, working papers can be quoted and cited without permission of the author, provided the source is clearly referred to as a working paper. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. is a registered trademark. Preface This report presents a set of 29 case studies of cardiovascular and stroke research grants funded in three countries between 1989 and 1993. The case studies focused on the individual grants but considered the development of the investigators and ideas involved in the research projects from initiation to the present day. Basic biomedical and clinical cardiovascular and stroke research grants awarded in Australia, Canada and the UK were selected through a stratified random selection approach that aimed to include both high- and low-impact grants. Case studies were constructed around the Payback Framework1, a research evaluation framework that is both a tool for evaluating a range of potential outputs from research and a logic model that provides a mechanism for conceptualising the process through which outputs are created.
    [Show full text]
  • NCI Budget Fact Book for Fiscal Year 1998
    NCI FACT BOOK National Cancer Institute U.S. DEPARTMENT Public Health Service 1998 OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes Of Health The information set forth in this publication is compiled and amended annually by the financial management staff of the National Cancer Institute and is intended primarily for use by members of the Institute, principal advisory groups to the Institute and others involved in the administration and management of the National Cancer Program. Questions regarding any of the information contained herein may be directed to the Financial Management Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Organization Director's Biography ........................................ 1 Former Directors of the NCI .................................. 2 National Cancer Advisory Board .............................. 3 Division Boards of Scientific Counselors ........................ 5 President's Cancer Panel .................................... 6 Executive Committee Members ............................... 6 Organization Charts: National Cancer Institute ................................... 7 Office of the Director ...................................... 8 Office of Management .................................... 9 Division of Basic Sciences ................................. 10 Division of Clinical Sciences ............................... 11 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics ................. 12 Division of Cancer Prevention .............................. 13
    [Show full text]