DOCSLIB.ORG

Japan and Its Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Japan and Its Background New Prescriptive limit in Japan and its background ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Capt. Kazuhiko Matsumoto Masato Nagai 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 1 Executive Summary Japanese Authority/JCAB set New Prescriptive Limit Some contents is very unique. New Limit for 3 pilots is FTL to 15h FDP to 17h with Class 1 rest facility We shear the background of the limit 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 2 CONTENTS 1.Who is All Nippon Airways ? 2.Geopolitical Position of Japan 3.New Prescriptive limit in Japan 4.FRM Steps in Japan 5.Background - Working Group & Reference Information - Fatigue Survey - Result of Survey 6.At the End 7.Reference 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 3 Who is All Nippon Airways / ANA ? Biggest Airline in Japan, The launch customer of Boeing 787 ANA brand is operated by ANA, Air Japan/AJX and ANA Wings/AKX OPERATION Domestic + International : about 1,000/day PILOTS : about 2,800 NUMBER OF AIRCRAFT ： about 270 B777-200/200ER B787-8/9 ANA&AJX B767-300/300ER/300F B737-700/800 /300/300ER ANA&AJX ANA&AKX A380 B737-500 AKX A320/321 DHC8-400(Q400） AKX 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 4 Geopolitical Position of Japan ANA Brand Operation from Tokyo ⇒ Jet Stream ⇒ ⇒ Jet Stream ⇒ To Europe : 11~13hs in Head Jet Stream (3 pilots) To India : 8~10.5hs in Head Jet Stream (2~3 pilots) From N America : 10~14.5hs in Head Jet Stream (2~3 pilots) From Hawaii : 8~10hs in Head Jet Stream (2 pilots) E/SE Asia & Oceania : 5~9.5hs Midnight Flight & 9hs round trip duty Domestic : 4 LDG in Typhoon & Severe Winter Operation 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 5 New Prescriptive limit in Japan Current New Domestic FTL 2 Starting time of duty To 2 LEG From 3LEG up to 8h pilots 0500-1659 10h 9h International up to 12h 1700-0459 9h 8h 3 Over 12h Limit to 15h pilots *Need appropriate rest facility *Over 13h, need Class 1 rest facility *Not continuous duty in cockpit over 8h 4 Limit to 17h pilots *Need appropriate rest facility *not continuous duty in cockpit over 8h Total FTL 100h in 1 month* 100h in any 28 consecutive days 270h in 3 month* 1,000h in any 365 consecutive days 1,000h in 1 year* *:Calendar month or year 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 6 New Prescriptive limit in Japan Current New FDP 2 NIL 9h~13h depend on start of FDP and sectors Pilots Start of FDP 1-2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0000-0459 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 9 9 9 9 0500-0559 12 11.5 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 9 9 0600-1359 13 12.5 12 11.5 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 1400-1559 12 11.5 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 9 9 1600-2359 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 9 9 9 9 3 14h~18h depend on Pilots number, sectors and Class of rest facility Pilots Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Sector 1-2 3 Pilots 17 16 15 4 4 Pilots 18 17 16 Pilots Sector 3- 3 Pilots 16 15 14 4 Pilots 17 16 15 Total FDP NIL 60h in any 7 consecutive days 190h in any 28 consecutive days 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 7 New Prescriptive limit in Japan Current New REST Interval NIL Minimum 10h (Sleep opportunity 8h) Add rest after WOCL flight duty Add rest after time zone difference flight duty (Away and Home) Periodical 1 calendar day 36h including 2 nights in every 136h off in 7 If at or over 4 times WOCL flight duty in 7days, add Calendar days more rest time th OtherIssue Acclimate: 4 JUL 2019 NIL Depend on Time difference and Time elapsed Effect : 1st OCT 2019 * since reporting * : EffectiveStandby date willNIL be extend to endStandby of 2021, at appropriate rest facility, if the airline report appropriate availabilityimplementation period 14hplan and to JCAB. Total hour limit of availability & flight duty period FDP + 4 h or 16h for 2 pilots and 16h for for 3&4 pilots Unforeseen No time Limit, FLT limit over only after takeoff (need reporting to condition, but need authority) commander’s appropriate FDP limit + 2h for 2pilots, +3h for 3&4 pilots (need discretion additional rest reporting to authority, when over +1h) 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 8 FRM Steps in Japan 1992 Current Limit was effected, based on FAA regulation, but using fatigue blood test in actual flight, etc. 2011- The survey was conducted by working group for catching up global 2016 development of FRM The WG was consisting of authority and airlines in Association of Air Transport Engineering and Research / ATEC. 2017 FRM for pilots in SMS was issued and effective Phase - 1 Fatigue Call is clearly describe in each company OM FRM concept in SMS is - FRM education for pilots, scheduling staff and Executive common basic education material in Japan - Fatigue report and risk management procedure 2018 JCAB Working Group for new Prescriptive limit and fatigue survey. 2019 New Prescriptive Limit was issued at 4th JUL 2019, Phase - 2 Effect at 1st OCT 2019. As transition phase, operator must be applied by the end of 2021 at the latest, reporting appropriate implementation plan to JCAB. 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 9 Background – Working group JCAB Working Group - Medical Doctor / Aviation Medicine - ex Pilot / Director of Japan Aircraft Pilot Association - Doctor / Safety Information - Specialist / Fatigue Science - Medical Doctor / Sleep Science Reference information for WG - ICAO Doc 9966 2nd Ed. - Prescriptive limit in other country, especially FAA, EASA, CASA, CAA Singapore - Background reference study paper of FAA, EASA prescriptive limit - Fatigue reports gathering in each airlines. - Hearing from ALPA Japan and The Scheduled airlines Association of JAPAN - Fatigue Survey 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 10 Background – Fatigue Survey Purpose of the Survey For reference information of working group, focus to the difference point of current JCAB standard rather than FAA/EASA Item (2 pilots and 3 pilots) 1. Continuous flight hours (2 & 3 pilots) 2. WOCL (2 & 3 pilots) 3. Number of Segment (2 pilots) In order to eliminate as much as possible the influence of factors other than the target items, the conditions are limited for selection of the targets flights. Method Follow the methods recommended by ICAO DOC 9966 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 11 Background – Fatigue Survey Conditions - Reporting time - Home / Away （If Away, interval in local) For one segment Cruise - Survey Pilot (Need Motivation) : PIC Climb Descent - Home in Japan Start Measurement End Measurement - Survey 3-5 times for each For multi segments - Well learned about survey and PVT-192 End - Measurement Start Measurement Measurement - Timing : Before departure briefing and just after block in cockpit - Location : Rooms with less disturbing - Tool : PVT – 192 (5mins) and Samn-Perelli/SP Checklist - Observer : Need a learned person who support, observe and record - Record : Measurement Condition, Disturbing factor, Signs of Fatigue, 72 hours Sleep Log, Commute, Any other fatigue factor, etc - Size of survey flight 15 flights or pattern for each survey subdivision Total 270 flights/pattern (15 flights/pattern x 18 subdivision) ,9 Airlines 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 12 Background – Fatigue Survey Method of analysis - Method is based on advise from specialist in Working Group - If delay over 1h, eliminate form database - PVT-192 - △PVT (%)= Mean Reaction Time at End / Mean RT at Start - Mean and deviation △PVT for comparison each subdivision - Statistical evaluation - Samn-Perelli - △SP = SP at End – SP at Start - Deviation of △SP for comparison each subdivision - Statistical evaluation 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 13 Background – Result of Fatigue Survey 1A. Continuous flight hours (2 & 3 pilots) from Home（Japan） ・Reporting at 0700-1159 at Japan ・Flight hours 5, 7, 8, 9, 10h for 2 pilots, 10, 11h for 3 pilots Flight hours vs △PVT 2 pilots Flight hours vs △SP 3 pilots Ave JST time of measurement at end Ave time of measurement at start 5h 7h 8h 9h 10h 10h 11h 5h 7h 8h 9h 10h 10h 11h Flight Hours 2pilots --> <-- 3 pilots 2pilots --> <-- 3 pilots Fig-1 Flight hours vs △PVT Fig 2 Each value of △PVT Result ・△PVT and △SP tended to increase with increasing flight hours. ・Fatigue level for 3 pilots is better than 2 pilots. It seems the effect on inflight rest. 1st October 2019, FRMS Forum Conference in San Francisco 14 Background – Result of Fatigue Survey 1B. Continuous flight hours (3 pilots) from Away（North America） ・Reporting at 0700-1159 at LCL time ・Time zone difference 7h to 10h from Japan ・Pilots stay at LCL 36h to 48h ・Flight hours 12, 13, 14h for 3 pilots (RMKS 14h : only winter from North America) Flight hours vs △SP Flight hours vs △PVT △PVT(%) Ave time of measurement at end Ave JST time of measurement at start 12h 13h 14h 12h 13h 14h Flight Hours △ Fig-4 Flight hours vs △PVT 3pilots Fig 5 Each value of △PVT 2pilots Fig-6 Flight hours vs SP Result ・The relationship between flight hours and △PVT /△SP could not be confirmed ・It seems that pilots fatigue is recovered in all of surveyed flights, - In-flight rest facility is class 1 - Pilots duty in cockpit seat is not so long due to rest pattern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Years Years Service Or 20,000 Hours of Flying
    VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ASIA PACIFIC AIRLINES 50 50YEARSYEARS Japan Airlines celebrating a golden anniversary AnsettAnsett R.I.PR.I.P.?.? Asia-PacificAsia-Pacific FleetFleet CensusCensus UPDAUPDATETE U.S.U.S. terrterroror attacks:attacks: heavyheavy economiceconomic fall-outfall-out forfor Asia’Asia’ss airlinesairlines VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 COVER STORY N E W S Politics still rules at Thai Airways International 8 50 China Airlines clinches historic cross strait deal 8 Court rules 1998 PAL pilots’ strike illegal 8 YEARS Page 24 Singapore Airlines pulls out of Air India bid 10 Air NZ suffers largest corporate loss in New Zealand history 12 Japan Airlines’ Ansett R.I.P.? Is there any way back? 22 golden anniversary Real-time IFE race hots up 32 M A I N S T O R Y VOL. 9 NO. 1 OCTOBER 2001 Heavy economic fall-out for Asian carriers after U.S. terror attacks 16 MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ASIA PACIFIC AIRLINES HELICOPTERS 50 Flying in the face of bureaucracy 34 50YEARS Japan Airlines celebrating a FEATURE golden anniversary Training Cathay Pacific Airways’ captains of tomorrow 36 Ansett R.I.P.?.? Asia-Pacific Fleet Census UPDATE S P E C I A L R E P O R T Asia-Pacific Fleet Census UPDATE 40 U.S. terror attacks: heavy economic fall-out for Asia’s airlines Photo: Mark Wagner/aviation-images.com C O M M E N T Turbulence by Tom Ballantyne 58 R E G U L A R F E A T U R E S Publisher’s Letter 5 Perspective 6 Business Digest 51 PUBLISHER Wilson Press Ltd Photographers South East Asia Association of Asia Pacific Airlines GPO Box 11435 Hong Kong Andrew Hunt (chief photographer), Tankayhui Media Secretariat Tel: Editorial (852) 2893 3676 Rob Finlayson, Hiro Murai Tan Kay Hui Suite 9.01, 9/F, Tel: (65) 9790 6090 Kompleks Antarabangsa, Fax: Editorial (852) 2892 2846 Design & Production Fax: (65) 299 2262 Jalan Sultan Ismail, E-mail: [email protected] Ü Design + Production Web Site: www.orientaviation.com E-mail: [email protected] 50250 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Effects of Air Transport Liberalisation on the Domestic Market in Japan
    Chikage Miyoshi Analysis Of The Effects Of Air Transport Liberalisation On The Domestic Market In Japan COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS PhD Thesis Academic year 2006-2007 Chikage Miyoshi Analysis of the effects of air transport liberalisation on the domestic market in Japan Supervisor: Dr. G. Williams May 2007 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Cranfield University 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the different experiences in the Japanese domestic air transport market compared to those of the intra-EU market as a result of liberalisation along with the Slot allocations from 1997 to 2005 at Haneda (Tokyo international) airport and to identify the constraints for air transport liberalisation in Japan. The main contribution of this study is the identification of the structure of deregulated air transport market during the process of liberalisation using qualitative and quantitative techniques and the provision of an analytical approach to explain the constraints for liberalisation. Moreover, this research is considered original because the results of air transport liberalisation in Japan are verified and confirmed by Structural Equation Modelling, demonstrating the importance of each factor which affects the market. The Tokyo domestic routes were investigated as a major market in Japan in order to analyse the effects of liberalisation of air transport. The Tokyo routes market has seven prominent characteristics as follows: (1) high volume of demand, (2) influence of slots, (3) different features of each market category, (4) relatively low load factors, (5) significant market seasonality, (6) competition with high speed rail, and (7) high fares in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney to Japan Direct Flights
    Sydney To Japan Direct Flights Undying and harnessed Roth still catnapping his commonality legally. Daren decolonising his mammals noosed resplendently or creepingly after Mika illegalizes and quiesce pityingly, deranged and polypod. Unlucky Morton still profiles: viewable and amaranthaceous Tuckie emblazons quite jocular but outgrowing her gazpachos metonymically. Where its annual celtic music is the direct flights are provided free hotel quarantine hotel has been received from tokyo direct flights from taipei was. The test result certificate before boarding their transfer in. How long does reading take out fly from Auckland International to Tokyo? All of residence permits and polite, love put into singapore permanent residence or may both our flights? The country on flights operated by british airways, but definitely not feel safe while seafarers must carry supporting documentation customers feel quite good staff! Passengers and is with departure and destination before departure on trip away sale until way flights sydney to japan airlines to visit kyushu island nation at brisbane or a different. Go through narita airport will be direct buses between sydney? Do not even bundle your email. By continuing to browse our site, often are consenting to hum use of cookies. Schengen are there is evident in place for direct flights operated by rest, gaining outstanding value options, with other eligible for my girlfriend. Transfer passengers will. No cancel element, no replies. Airlines can adjust prices for tickets from Sydney, Australia to Tokyo based on the day and oversee that you decide to book its flight. Additionally the goods's new seasonal flights from Sydney to Sapporo take off tonight to coincide with group ski season in Japan meaning you can.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]
  • (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers February 1, 2020 In order to facilitate the arrival of Visa Waiver Program (VWP) passengers, carriers need to be signatory to a current agreement with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). A carrier is required to be signatory to an agreement in order to transport aliens seeking admission as nonimmigrant visitors under the VWP (Title 8, U.S.C. § 1187(a)(5). The carriers listed below are currently signatory to the VWP and can transport passengers under the program. The date indicates the expiration of the current signed agreement. Agreements are valid for 7 years. If you transport VWP passengers and are not a signatory carrier, fines will be levied. Use the following link to apply to CBP to become a Signatory Carrier: https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/business-pleasure/vwp/signatory-status # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2022) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2022) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2020) 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2023) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2024) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2023) 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2024) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2025) A A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2021) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2021) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2022) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (08/26/2026) AbbVie US LLC (10/15/2026) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2026) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2025) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2026) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2022) Ace Flight Center Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical Consultations Between Japan and the United States of America
    7 December 2015 Air Talks Office, Civil Aviation Bureau Aeronautical Consultations between Japan and the United States of America The consultations between the aeronautical authorities of Japan and U.S. were held in Washington DC, U.S., on 2 – 4 December 2015. After the three-day session, both delegations decided to continue discussions on capacity entitlement of Haneda Airport. Delegations From the Japanese side, Mr. Hisataka Hiragochi, Assistant Vice-Minister for International Aviation, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (Head of Delegation), and other representatives attended the meeting. From the U.S. side, Mr.Thomas S. Engle, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Affairs, Department of State (Head of Delegation), and other representatives attended the meeting. Air Talks Office, Civil Aviation Bureau Contact：Kanayama or Minemura Tel ：03-5253-8111 Ext ：49180 or 49181 Direct ：03-5253-8702 FAX ：03-5253-1658 Japan – U.S. Aviation Relations １．Agreement between Japan and U.S for Air Services Date of signature : 11 August 1952 Date of effect : 15 September 1953 ２．Current Services - the IATA Northern Winter 2015 Season (as of 25 October2015） Passenger : 525 flights / week, Cargo : 75 flights / week (1) Japanese Side Passenger : 203 flights / week, Cargo : 24 flights / week Points in Japan Narita, Haneda, Kansai, Nagoya Points in U.S. Washington DC, New York, Boston, Chicago, Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco、San Diego, San Jose, Honolulu, Guam, Anchorage (2) U.S. Side Passenger : 322 flights / week, Cargo : 51 flights / week Points in Japan Narita, Haneda, Kansai, Nagoya, Fukuoka, Sapporo, Sendai Points in U.S. Washington DC, New York, Newark, Chicago, Los Angeles, Denver, San Francisco, Atlanta, Houston, Seattle, Portland, Dallas, Minneapolis, Detroit, Honolulu, Guam, Saipan, Anchorage, Memphis, Indianapolis, Auckland, Cincinnati (3)Operating Airlines Japanese Airlines Japan Airlines (One World)、ANA (Star Alliance)、Nippon Cargo Airlines U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nippon Airways Co., Ltd
    PROSPECTUS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. Admission of 537,500,000 Shares of Common Stock to the Official List of the UK Listing Authority (the “Official List”), and to trading on the Main Market (the “Market”) of the London Stock Exchange plc (the “London Stock Exchange”) The date of this Prospectus is July 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ...................................................................... 1 Risk Factors .................................................................... 5 Admission to Listing .............................................................. 17 Enforcement of Liabilities .......................................................... 17 Available Information ............................................................. 17 Forward-looking Statements ........................................................ 18 Presentation of Financial and Other Information.......................................... 19 Glossary ....................................................................... 20 Information Concerning Our Common Stock ............................................ 21 Exchange Rates ................................................................. 23 Capitalization and Indebtedness ...................................................... 24 Selected Consolidated Financial Data and Other Information ................................ 26 Operating and Financial Review ..................................................... 29 Business ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The ANA Group As of March 31, 2012
    The ANA Group As of March 31, 2012 ANA Group Organization General Meeting Management Committee of Shareholders Corporate Auditors Corporate Auditors Office Operations Committee Board of Corporate Auditors Board of Directors Operations Reports & Review Committee Senior Advisor CS Promotion Committee Chairman Internal Audit President & CEO Safety Promotion Committee IT Strategy & Governance Committee Risk Management Committee Headquarters Departments CSR Promotion Committee Compliance Committee Environment Committee Operations & Airport Services Marketing & Sales Cargo Marketing Flight Operations Engineering & Maintenance Inflight Services & Services Domestic Branches Domestic Airport Branches Overseas Branches Domestic Airport Offices Overseas Airport Offices Number of Subsidiaries and Affiliates Operating Segment Total of Subsidiaries of which, consolidated of which, equity method Total of Affiliates of which, equity method Air Transportation 50 34 − 7 4 Travel Services 5 5 − 1 1 Other Businesses 53 23 5 33 12 Total 108 62 5 41 17 Major Subsidiaries Percentage Paid-in Owned by Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliates Principal Businesses/Relationship with the Company Capital1 the Parent Air Transportation Air Nippon Co., Ltd.2 (ANK) Joint transportation services, leasing of ANA aircraft and other assets, maintenance for other airlines ¥ 100 million 100.0 % ANA WINGS CO., LTD. (AKX) Joint transportation services, leasing of ANA aircraft and other assets, maintenance for other airlines 50 100.0 Air Japan Co., Ltd. (AJX) Leasing of ANA aircraft and other assets, maintenance for other airlines, leasing of ANA offices 50 100.0 ANA Catering Service Co., Ltd. In-flight food purchasing 100 100.0 ANA Airport Handling Co., LTD.3 ANA aircraft ground handling, airport customer services for other airlines, leasing of ANA offices and warehouses 100 100.0 New Tokyo Airport Service Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • SEALED AIR® Brand Instapak® Foam Return Locations
    SIMPLE FACTS ABOUT FOAM-IN-PLACE PACKAGING AND THE ENVIRONMENT The cushions protecting this product are made of Instapak® polyurethane packaging foam, a material that minimizes the amount of packaging used without compromising the protection of shipped goods. Instapak® packaging complies with international legislation restricting the presence of heavy metals. Source Reduction Instapak® foam has superior cushioning The shipment should be addressed to abilities that provide maximum protection Attn: Foam Return Program. For LTL or with a minimum of material. Less packaging larger sized shipments, or if you prefer is used, so less enters the waste stream. to drop the material off in person, please email the location closest to you to Reuse schedule a drop off time. ® Instapak foam cushions can be reused for Instapak® foam may be bagged, baled or multiple shipments or reshaped manually boxed. The foam must be clean, dry and not into carton fillers to fit the next product adhered to any corrugated cardboard material. shipped. Using Instapak® foam to protect products Instapak® Foam Return Program makes good environmental sense. For more Instapak® foam can be returned to the sites information about Instapak® foam, please call listed on the reverse side of this card. All Sealed Air’s toll-free general environmental returned foam is diverted from the information number: landfill and efficiently transported to local Waste-to-Energy facilities. Please follow the following steps to return your Instapak® foam: For parcel sized shipments, please send the cushions prepaid (COD’s will not be 1-800-982-6197 accepted) to the location on the back side or visit our website: of this card that is closest to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Friendly Airline List
    Family Friendly airline list Over 50 airlines officially approve the BedBox™! Below is a list of family friendly airlines, where you may use the BedBox™ sleeping function. The BedBox™ has been thoroughly assessed and approved by many major airlines. Airlines such as Singapore Airlines and Cathay Pacific are also selling the BedBox™. Many airlines do not have a specific policy towards personal comforts devices like the BedBox™, but still allow its use. Therefore, we continuously aim to keep this list up to date, based on user feedback, our knowledge, and our communication with the relevant airline. Aeromexico Japan Airlines - JAL Air Arabia Maroc Jet Airways Air Asia Jet Time Air Asia X Air Austral JetBlue Air Baltic Kenya Airways Air Belgium KLM Air Calin Kuwait Airways Air Caraibes La Compagnie Air China LATAM Air Europa LEVEL Air India Lion Airlines Air India Express LOT Polish Airlines Air Italy Luxair Air Malta Malaysia Airlines Air Mauritius Malindo Air Serbia Middle East Airlines Air Tahiti Nui Nok Air Air Transat Nordwind Airlines Air Vanuatu Norwegian Alaska Airlines Oman Air Alitalia OpenSkies Allegiant Pakistan International Airlines Alliance Airlines Peach Aviation American Airlines LOT Polish Airlines ANA - Air Japan Porter AtlasGlobal Regional Express Avianca Royal Air Maroc Azerbaijan Hava Yollary Royal Brunei AZUL Brazilian Airlines Royal Jordanian Bangkok Airways Ryanair Blue Air S7 Airlines Bmi regional SAS Brussels Airlines Saudia Cathay Dragon Scoot Cathay Pacific Silk Air CEBU Pacific Air Singapore Airlines China Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • To Readers of the Attached Code-Share List
    TO READERS OF THE ATTACHED CODE-SHARE LIST: The U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division’s code-share list is an informal compilation of code-share relationships between U.S. and foreign air carriers involving the transportation of passengers. As such, it does not represent a complete compilation of all code shares e.g. cargo and mail only. New code-share relationships are continually being negotiated, and the ones reflected in the attached listing may or may not be still in place or be of a continuing nature. Similarly, the list may not reflect all existing code shares of a particular type, or all existing types of code shares. This list is not an official document of the Department of Transportation and, accordingly, should not be relied upon or cited as such. NOTE: THIS LIST IS COMPRISED OF ONLY THOSE CARRIERS WHOSE CODE-SHARE RELATIONSHIPS ARE OF A NEW OR CONTINUING BASIS. DORMANT CODE-SHARE RELATIONSHIPS TO THE EXTENT KNOWN HAVE BEEN DELETED. Block descriptions of certain code-share arrangements approved for the same term may have been compressed into one block description to conserve space. If the authorities are not new or changed, but only compressed, the compressed descriptions will not appear in bold type. Carriers must notify the Department no later than 30-day before they begin any new code-share service under the code-share services authorized. This report is current through July 31, 2021. Changes from the previous reports are noted in bold type. Regional carriers operating for large carriers (e.g. Delta Connection, American Eagle, United Express) will be listed in the endnotes of this report.
    [Show full text]