Provenance Analysis of the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian Nama Group (Namibia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Provenance Analysis of the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian Nama Group (Namibia) PROVENANCE ANALYSIS OF THE NEOPROTEROZOIC-CAMBRIAN NAMA GROUP (NAMIBIA) AND THE ARROYO DEL SOLDA*0 GROUP (URUGUAY): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PALAEOGEOGRAPHIC RECONSTRUCTION OF SW GONDWANA by Gonzalo HomerocBlanco Gaucher) (Gonzalo Blanco4 THESIS presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in GEOLOGY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE of the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG Supervisor Dr. H.M. Rajesh Co-supervisors Dr. U. Zimmermann Prof. G.J.B. Germs October 2008 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own original work, conducted under the supervision of Dr. H.M. Rajesh, and co-supervision of Dr. U. Zimmermann and Prof G.J.B. Germs. It is submitted for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor in Geology to the Faculty of Science at the University of Johannesburg. No part of this research has been submitted in the past, or is being submitted, for a degree or examination at any other University or Institution of higher education. nzalo Blanco 26 P I °°' v-k,61\mle ciSUiter Date Place ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express many thanks, To my supervisor, Dr. H.M. Rajesh, for the support and guidance. To my co-supervisor, Prof. Gerard Germs, who introduced me to the geology of Nama Group and to share his knowledge not only on geology but also on life. To the Faculty of Science at the University of Johannesburg for the financial support in the form of a bursary awarded to me as a post-graduate student. To the staff of the Department of Geology at the University of Johannesburg and post-graduate mates from the University of Johannesburg. To the staff (Dr. Willie Oldewage, Dr. Herman van Niekerk and Mr L.L. Coetzee) at SPECTRAU, the Central Analytical Facility of the University of Johannesburg, for permission and help to use various analytical equipments. To Prof Farid Chemale Jr. of the Laboratorio de Geologia Isotopica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (Brazil), for help with isotope analyses. To the IGCP project 478 "Neoproterozoic to Early-Palaeozoic events in SW Gondwana". To the external reviewers, Dr. David Chew and Dr. Beverly Saylor, for the constructive and encouraging comments, and corrections on the thesis that certainly improved the quality of scientific material as well as the language used to present it. Special thanks to, Dr. Claudio Gaucher for his advice, collaboration and friendship that lead to the realization of this thesis against many complications. Prof. Peter Sprechmann, Gabriela Martinez and Leticia Chiglino for their valuable help and discussions during fieldworks in Uruguay. My parents and all my family in Uruguay and Argentina. This thesis is dedicated to my mother Nora, who is at the time of penning this down, successfully and courageously fighting against illness. My father Homero. My sister Gabriela. Juan Jose and Rosina. All my friends in Uruguay and overseas, with special mention to my unconditional friends, Federico and Leonardo - good friends from Joburg. For the good advises and support to Paul Balayer. Finally, but not least my wife Paulina, for her full support and love. ii ABSTRACT The amalgamation of SW Gondwana after the break-up of Rodinia supercontinent during the Neoproterozoic-early Palaeozic was one of the most active tectonic periods of the earth history and its geological evolution remains controversial. Recently, diverse hypotheses such as mantle plume activity, orthogonal continent-continent and strike-slip collisions according to different models try to explain the complex evolution of the Pan-African Brasiliano orogens and the associated sedimentary basins. In order to get insight of the SW Gondwana reconstruction, provenance analyses were performed on two Neoproterozoic-early Palaeozic sedimentary units: (1) the Arroyo del Soldado Group representing a —5000 meter thick platform succession unconformably overlying the mainly Archaean to Neoproterozoic rocks of the Rio de la Plata Craton in Uruguay and, (2) the Nama Group, a —2000 meter thick shallow marine to fluvial deposit interpreted as a foreland basin in response to tectonism in the adjacent northern Damara and western Gariep Orogenic Belts and unconformably overlying the mainly Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Kalahari Craton in Namibia. Several techniques including petrography, heavy mineral analysis, geochemistry, Sm-Nd isotope analysis and zircon dating were applied to both sedimentary basins. The petrographic, heavy mineral analyses and geochemical results from the Nama Group indicate a recycled upper crust composition characterized by metamorphic and granitic sources and minor mafic rocks. Palaeocurrent analyses of the chromian spinet bearing sandstones of the Nama Basin point to a volcanic island arc source located in the Damara Belt. Detrital zircon dating of the Nama Group display major peaks of Neoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic ages suggesting a provenance from the Damara/Gariep Belts and their basements. Palaeocurrents from the west and the dominance of Neoproterozoic-Cambrian detrital zircon ages (76%) in the "Molasse" stage of the foreland evolution probably indicate exhumation of the felsic volcanic arc root which probably occurred after the time indicated by the younger zircon dated at 531 ±9 Ma. The petrographic and geochemical results from the Arroyo del Soldado Group indicate a recycled upper crust composition characterized by source diversity composed of granite-gneissic and mafic-metamorphic rocks. On average, Nd isotopes account for Abstract iii negative ENd values and TDM ages in a range of variation found elsewhere within SW Gondwana. Detrital zircon dating indicate sources dominated by Palaeoproterozoic (1.7-2.0-2.2 Ga) and subordinate Archaean ages (2.5-2.9-3.5 Ga). The scarcity of Mesoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic zircons and palaeocurrent directions towards the east indicate that the Arroyo del Soldado Group was fed by detritus from the Rio de la Plata Craton favouring a passive margin tectonic setting for their deposition. Deformation of the Arroyo del Soldado Group took place ca. 530 Ma, after strike-slip collision with an African affinity terrane. Finally, based on the palaeogeographic evaluation, the provenance of Nama foreland basin and the passive margin deposit of the Arroyo del Soldado basin suggest that continent-continent collision of the Kalahari/Congo Cratons with the Rio de la Plata Craton and the Cuchilla Dionisio Pelotas Terrane most likely occurred due to strike slip accretion related to a component of N—S shortening in the period between 530 and 495 Ma. Abstract iv CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction and objectives 1.1 Provenance methodology .1 1.2 Objectives .3 1.3 The Arroyo del Soldado Group 6 1.3.1 The Uruguayan Shield .6 1.3.2 Lithostratigraphy and sedimentology of the Arroyo del Soldado Group 9 1.3.3 The Nico Perez Terrane .11 1.3.4 Age and correlations of the Arroyo del Soldado Group 13 1.4 The Nama Group .16 1.4.1 Damara Orogen ..16 Damara Belt 18 Gariep Belt 19 1.4.2 Stratigraphy, sedimentology and age of the Nama Group 20 1.4.3 Geotectonic setting of the Nama Group 23 1.5 Sampling and analytical methods ..25 1.6 Outline of the thesis 25 Chapter 2. Integrated provenance analyses on "Black Sands": A case study from the Lower Cambrian Fish River Subgroup (Nama Group, Namibia) Abstract 26 2.1 Introduction 27 2.2 Geological setting .29 2.2.1 Sedimentology 32 2.3 Sampling and analytical techniques .33 2.4 Sandstone petrography .34 2.5 Geochemistry 40 2.5.1 Major element chemistry ..40 2.5.2 Alteration and weathering .40 v 2.5.3 Trace element composition 41 2.6 Provenance .44 2.6.1 Framework mineral analyses 45 2.6.2 Detrital zircon dating 45 2.6.3 Heavy mineral analyses 47 2.6.4 Whole rock geochemistry 55 2.7 Discussion 59 2.7.1 Geochemistry and heavy mineral composition 59 2.7.2 Tectonic setting and sources .62 2.8 Concluding remarks 66 Chapter 3. Chemical composition and tectonic setting of chromian spinels of the Ediacaran-early Palaeozoic Nama Group, Namibia Abstract 68 3.1 Introduction 68 3.2 Nama Group ...72 3.3 Sampling and analytical techniques 73 3.4 Sedimentology and petrography of the chromian spinel bearing units 73 3.5 Chemistry of the chromian spinels and pyroxenes 78 3.6 Provenance of the detrital chromian spinels .79 3.7 Geotectonic implications 84 3.8 Concluding remarks 90 Chapter 4. Provenance of the Nama Group (Ediacaran-early Palaeozoic, Namibia): petrography, geochemistry and U-Pb zircon ages Abstract 91 4.1 Introduction 92 4.2 Nama Group 94 4.3 Damara Orogen 99 4.3.1 Damara Belt 99 4.3.2 Gaiep Belt 101 4.4 Sampling and analytical techniques 102 vi 4.5 Petrography 103 4.5.1 Kuibis Subgroup 103 4.5.2 Schwarzrand Subgroup 103 4.5.3 Fish River Subgoup 104 4.6 Geochemistry 105 4.6.1 Major element geochemistry ..105 4.6.2 Alteration 106 4.6.3 Trace elements 109 4.7 U-Pb detrital zircon dating 112 4.8 Discussion .116 4.8.1 Petrography .116 4.8.2 Geochemistry .118 4.8.3 Provenance and basin evolution .122 4.9 Concluding remarks 130 Chapter 5. Provenance of the Arroyo del Soldado Group (Ediacaran-Lower Cambrian, Uruguay): petrography, geochemistry, Nd isotopes and detrital zircon dating Abstract 132 5.1 Introduction 133 5.2 Geological setting 135 5.2.1 Pre- Arroyo del Soldado Group units 135 5.2.2 Lithostratigraphy of the Arroyo del Soldado Group ...137 5.2.3 Age and evolution of the Arroyo del Soldado Group .140 5.3 Sampling and analytical methods 141 5.4 Results ...143 5.4.1 Petrography 143 5.4.2 Geochemistry .144 5.4.3 Nd-isotopes 148 5.4.4 Detrital zircon ages 149 5.5 Discussion 151 5.5.1 Provenance .153 vii 5.5.2 Basin evolution and paleotectonic setting .159 5.6 Concluding remarks .163 Chapter 6.
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Journal, 8 (2): 315-389
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 315–389 MONOGRAPH Revision of the genus Amphiope L. Agassiz, 1840 (Echinoidea Astriclypeidae) with the description of a new species from the Miocene of France Paolo Stara1& Enrico Borghi2 1Centro Studi di Storia Naturale del Mediterraneo - Museo di Storia Naturale Aquilegia and Geomuseo Monte Arci, Masullas, Oristano, Sardinia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 2Società Reggiana di Scienze Naturali, Via Tosti 1, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The taxonomy of Amphiope L. Agassiz, 1840 (Echinoidea, Astriclypeidae), an echinoid dis- tributed in the Oligo-Miocene of Central and Southern Europe, is largely unresolved since the description of most species attributed to this genus was based only on the external mor- phological features, while important characters, such as the oral plating and the internal sup- port system, were poorly illustrated or completely omitted. Additionally, the type material of some species was missing or badly preserved and geographical/stratigraphical information about the type-locality was unclear. This was the case also for Amphiope bioculata (Des Moulins, 1837), the type species of the genus. The poor definition of the earlier described species of Amphiope prevented comparison with fossils from other localities and ages, sub- sequently attributed to this genus. A large part of the earlier species of Amphiope, key-taxa for the resolution of the complex taxonomy of this genus, are herein revised by modern meth- ods. For this purpose, the type material available in public institutions has been re-examined and, when possible, new topo-typic material has been collected. As a result, the morphological description of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Fossil Invertebrates 2 (Pdf)
    FLORIDA FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES Parl2 JANUARY 2OO2 SINGLE ISSUE: $z.OO OLIGOCENE AND MIOCENE ECHINOIDS CRAIG W. OYEN1 and ROGER W. PORTELL, lDeparlment of Geography and Earth Science Shippensburg U niversity 1871 Old Main Drive Shippensburg, PA 17257 -2299 e-mail: cwoyen @ ark.ship.edu 2Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida P. O. Box 117800 Gainesville, FL 32611 -7800 e-mail: portell @flmnh.ufl.edu A PUBLICATTON OF THE FLORTDA PALEONTOLOGTCAL SOCIETY tNC. r,q)-.'^ .o$!oLo"€n)- .l^\ z*- il--'t- ' .,vn\'9t\ x\\I ^".{@^---M'Wa*\/i w*'"'t:.&-.d te\ 3t tu , l ". (. .]tt f-w#wlW,/ \;,6'#,/ FLORIDA FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES tssN 1536-5557 Florida Fossil lnvertebrafes is a publication of the Florida Paleontological Society, Inc., and is intended as a guide for identification of the many, common, invertebrate fossils found around the state. lt will deal solely with named species; no new taxonomic work will be included. Two parts per year will be completed with the first three parts discussing echinoids. Part 1 (published June 2001) covered Eocene echinoids, Parl2 (January 2002 publication) is about Oligocene and Miocene echinoids, and Part 3 (June 2002 publication) will be on Pliocene and Pleistocene echinoids. Each issue will be image-rich and, whenever possible, specimen images will be at natural size (1x). Some of the specimens figured in this series soon will be on display at Powell Hall, the museum's Exhibit and Education Center. Each part of the series will deal with a specific taxonomic group (e.9., echinoids) and contain a brief discussion of that group's life history along with the pertinent geological setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Growth Pattern in the Sand Dollar, Echinarachnius Parma, (Lamarck)
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Summer 1964 VARIATION IN GROWTH PATTERN IN THE SAND DOLLAR, ECHINARACHNIUS PARMA, (LAMARCK) PRASERT LOHAVANIJAYA University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation LOHAVANIJAYA, PRASERT, "VARIATION IN GROWTH PATTERN IN THE SAND DOLLAR, ECHINARACHNIUS PARMA, (LAMARCK)" (1964). Doctoral Dissertations. 2339. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2339 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 65-950 microfilmed exactly as received LOHAVANIJAYA, Prasert, 1935- VARIATION IN GROWTH PATTERN IN THE SAND DOLLAR, ECHJNARACHNIUS PARMA, (LAMARCK). University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1964 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan VARIATION IN GROWTH PATTERN IN THE SAND DOLLAR, EC’HINARACHNIUS PARMA, (LAMARCK) BY PRASERT LOHAVANUAYA B. Sc. , (Honors), Chulalongkorn University, 1959 M.S., University of New Hampshire, 1961 A THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1964 This thesis has been examined and approved. May 2 2, 1 964. Date An Abstract of VARIATION IN GROWTH PATTERN IN THE SAND DOLLAR, ECHINARACHNIUS PARMA, (LAMARCK) This study deals with Echinarachnius parma, the common sand dollar of the New England coast. Some problems concerning taxonomy and classification of this species are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Permian Glossopterid Ovuliferous Reproductive Organs
    Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology ISSN: 0311-5518 (Print) 1752-0754 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/talc20 The architecture of Permian glossopterid ovuliferous reproductive organs Stephen Mcloughlin & Rose Prevec To cite this article: Stephen Mcloughlin & Rose Prevec (2019) The architecture of Permian glossopterid ovuliferous reproductive organs, Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 43:4, 480-510, DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2019.1659852 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2019.1659852 Published online: 01 Oct 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 138 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=talc20 The architecture of Permian glossopterid ovuliferous reproductive organs STEPHEN MCLOUGHLIN and ROSE PREVEC MCLOUGHLIN,S.&PREVEC, R. 20 September 2019. The architecture of Permian glossopterid ovuliferous reproductive organs. Alcheringa 43, 480–510. ISSN 0311-5518 A historical account of research on glossopterid ovuliferous reproductive structures reveals starkly contrasting interpretations of their architecture and homologies from the earliest investigations. The diversity of interpretations has led to the establishment of a multitude of genera for these fossil organs, many of the taxa being synonymous. We identify a need for taxonomic revision of these genera to clearly demarcate taxa before they can be used effectively as palaeobiogeographic or biostratigraphic indices. Our assessment of fructification features based on extensive studies of adpression and permineralized fossils reveals that many of the character states for glossopterids used in previous phylogenetic analyses are erroneous.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Contributions to the Geology of Georgia
    SHORT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF GEORGIA ATLANTA 1978 BULLITIN 93 For convenience in selecting our reports from your bookshelves, they will be color-keyed across the spine by subject as follows: Red Valley & Ridge mapping and structural geology Dk. Purple Piedmont & Blue Ridge mapping and struc- tural geology Maroon Coastal Plain mapping and stratigraphy Lt. Green Paleontology Lt. Blue Coastal Zone studies Dk. Green Geochemical and Geophysical studies Dk. Blue Hydrology Olive Economic geology Mining directory Yellow Environmental studies Engineering studies Dk. Orange Bibliographies and lists of publications Brown Petroleum and natural gas Black Field trip guidebooks Dk. Brown Collections of papers Colors have been selected at random, and will be augmented as new subjects are published. ---- -·-- ------·- -~-~-·-·--· ·- .. SHORT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF GEORGIA STATE OF GEORGIA Department of Natural Resources Joe D. Tanner. Commissioner Environmental Protection Division J. leonard Ledbetter. Director Georgia Geologic Survey John R. George, Acting State Geologist ATLANTA 1978 CONTENTS Page The Huber Formation of Eastern Central Georgia by B. F. BUIE . 1 Figure 1. Contact of Huber Formation overlain unconformably by Clinchfield Sand . 2 Figure 2. Close-up view of fossil zone in clayey sand, near top of Huber Formation . 2 Figure 3. Schematic diagram of Cretaceous and Tertiary strata, Macon-Gordon area, Georgia . 3 Table 1. Detailed stratigraphic section of Huber Formation 4 Figure 4. Road cut exposure of updip Huber Formation 5 Figure 5. Photograph of measured section (Table 1) . 5 Table 2. Characteristics of kaolins of the Cretaceous beds undifferentiated and Huber Formation . 6 Figure 6. Contrast of fracture form in Tertiary and Cretaceous kaolin 6 Figure 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Echinoid Assemblages As a Tool for Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction ^ an Example from the Early Miocene of Egypt
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 201 (2003) 157^177 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Echinoid assemblages as a tool for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction ^ an example from the Early Miocene of Egypt Andreas Kroh a;Ã, James H. Nebelsick b a Institut fu«r Geologie und Pala«ontologie, Heinrichstrasse 26, 8010 Graz, Austria b Institut und Museum fu«r Geologie und Pala«ontologie, Sigwartstrasse 10, 72076 Tu«bingen, Germany Received 3 October 2002; received in revised form 11 June 2003; accepted 31 July 2003 Abstract A rich Lower Miocene echinoid fauna has been investigated from Gebel Gharra, NW of Suez, Egypt. The ca 140 m long section consists of a siliciclastic lower part and a carbonate-dominated upper part. This corresponds to a general transgression/regression cycle. In all, 27 different echinoid taxa were recognised. The level of taxonomic identification varies depending on test completeness and preservation of specific morphological characters. The palaeoecology of the echinoids was inferred using a functional morphological approach and actualistic comparisons. A wide variety of ecological habitats are represented with the presence of regular as well as irregular sea urchins; epibenthic as well as endobenthic forms, as well as a wide range of interpreted burrowing depths for different irregular echinoids. Seven different echinoid assemblages were distinguished, which differ with respect to the species diversity, skeletal taphonomy and sedimentary environment: (1) the Parascutella Assemblage displays spectacular mass
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Scutellina (Echinoidea) from the Northern Part of the Western Desert, Egypt
    Cainozoic Research, 14(2), pp. 119-134, December 2014 119 Miocene Scutellina (Echinoidea) from the northern part of the Western Desert, Egypt Mohamed Said M. Ali Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Minia University, Minia, Egypt; email: [email protected] Received 12 August 2014, revised version accepted 10 October 2014 Six Scutella, one Parascutella and three Amphiope species are recorded from four Miocene (Burdigalian and Langhian-Serravallian) sections: Gebel West El Migahhiz, Gebel El Takrur (Siwa Oasis), Wadi Um El Ashtan (Mersa Matruh) and Wadi Aqrab (El Salum), all in the northern part of the Western Desert of Egypt. These species are Scutella aegyptiaca Ali, S. ammonis Fuchs, S. checchiae Desio, S. conica Ali, S. robecchibricchettii Desio, S. rostrata Fuchs, Parascutella stefaninii (Desio), Amphiope miocenica Ali, A. arcuata Fuchs, and A. fuchsi Fourtau. Considering Durham’s diagnosis of the genus Scutella: ‘periproct located midway between the peristome and the posterior margin of the test’, all the species described from the Central Paratethys (Vienna Basin, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Austria and Ukraine) and referred to Scutella by earlier authors appear to be congeneric with either Parascutella (periproct submarginal). This means that no occurrences of the genus Scutella in the Central Paratethys during Miocene times are known to date. KEY WORDS: Siwa Oasis, Mersa Matruh, El Salum, Scutella, Parascutella, Amphiope, Paratethys. Introduction Amphiope from the middle Miocene of the Siwa Oasis, Scutella ammonis, S. rostrata, Amphiope truncata and A. The Miocene rocks in the northern part of the Western arcuata. Gregory (1898, p. 153) described Scutella sub- Desert of Egypt have yielded a well-preserved echinoid rotunda var.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Heritage of the Island of Gozo, Malta
    The natural heritage of the Island of Gozo, Malta Dirk De Ketelaere, Anna Spiteri and Josianne Vella Integrated Resources Management (IRM) Co. Ltd. Malta e-mail: [email protected] website: www.environmentalmalta.com The name ‘Gozo’, meaning ‘joy’ in Castilian, was given to this small island by the Aragonese who took over the Maltese Islands in 1282. Over the years the island has inspired many names. In 700 BC the Phoenicians called it “Gwl” or ‘Gaulos’, meaning round ship, a name that was retained by the Greeks and translated by the Romans as ‘Gaudos’ or ‘Gaulum’. The Moors, who ruled the Maltese islands around a thousand years ago, and who strongly influenced its Semitic language, referred to it as ‘Gaudoich’ preceding the current name ‘Għawdex’ (pronounced Aw-desh), which is used today by the local inhabitants. In a legendary context it is often called the ‘Island of Calypso’ referring to the Greek mythological location of Ogygia, home of the beautiful nymph Calypso. In Homer’s epic poem, The Odyssey, Calypso keeps the Greek hero Odysseus as a prisoner of love for 7 long years. Introduction The Maltese Archipelago, located at the centre of the Mediterranean Sea, consists of the islands of Malta, Gozo and Comino as well as a few other uninhabited islets. Gozo is the second largest island with a coastline of 47 km, and a surface area of 66 square kilometres. The Islands have a typical Mediterranean climate, with mild, wet winters and long, dry summers. The average annual rainfall amounts to around 530 millimetres and follows a clearly marked seasonal rhythm.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior United States Geological Survey
    Bulletin No, 244 Series 0, Systematic Geology and Paleontology, 69 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES J). WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 19 OS HENRY SHALER "WILLIAMS AND EDWARD. M. KINDLE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transtnittal ..................................................... 7 Fart I. Fossil faunas of the Devonian andM-ississippinn (" Lower Carbonifer­ ous") of Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky ........................ 9 Part II. Fossil faunas of Devonian sections in central and northern Penn­ sylvania ............................................................... General index .............:.............................................. Index to paleontologic names ............................................. 139 3 ILLUSTRATIONS. ^ / Page. PLATE I. Sections in Indiana and Kentucky near Louisville.............'.... 16 .1.1. Sections in Virginia and West Virginia.fl........................ 28 III. A, Lowest limestone oi Franklindale beds, part oi Gulf Brook sec­ tion, Pennsylvania; B, Oswayo (Pocono) formation, zone 12 of South Mountain section, Pennsylvania......................... 96 IV. Sections in Bradford and Tioga counties, Pa...................... 130 Fu;. 1. Section on Brooks Run, Bullitt County, Ky.......................... 20 2. Section south of Huber, Ky ....................................... 21 ll Sections in Virginia and West Virginia . f'........................... 43 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITBD STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,
    [Show full text]
  • TRIP A-1 DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY and PALEOECOLOG Y in the CHERRY VALLEY, NEW YORK REGION by Donald W
    TRIP A-1 DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOG Y IN THE CHERRY VALLEY, NEW YORK REGION by Donald W. Fisher State Paleontologist N.Y. Geological Survey-N.Y. State Museum, State Education Department, Albany, N. Y. 12234* PROLOG In the northern parts of Otsego and Schoharie Counties, New York and bordering the southern margin of the Mohawk Lowlands and the northern margin of the Allegheny Uplands, is an exceptionally well exposed Early and Medial Devonian (400-365 million years old) sequence. These flat-lying sed imentary rocks record a broad spectrum of paleoenvironments. It is my intention to introduce you to the physical and organic makeup of these Devonian strata and to show how their combined characteristics enable a reconstruction of past environments and their associated role in the events of geologic history. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Gwyneth Gil lette and John B. Skiba, cartographers with the N.Y. Geological Survey, prepared Figures 1 and 2-3, respectively. For their contribution to the better understanding of Devonian geology in the Cherry Valley region, I am deeply grateful. HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK As early as the 1820's and 1830's, exquisite fossils were co llected by the Gebhards, Jo hn Sr. and Jr., from the Devonian rocks of their native Schoharie Valley- a reference area bordering the Cherry Va lley region to the southeast. The establishment of the Geological and Natural History Survey of New York on April 15, 1836 was a tremendous impetus toward learning more about the State's rocks. William W. Mather's First (eastern) District Report (1843) and Lardner Va nuxem's Third (central) District Report (1842), both classics in early Amer ican geology, covered Schoharie and Otsego Counties, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomorphological and Taphonomic Gradients in Clypeasteroid
    Ecomorphological and taphonomic gradients in clypeasteroid-dominated echinoid assemblages along a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate shelf from the early Miocene of northern Sardinia, Italy ANDREA MANCOSU and JAMES H. NEBELSICK Mancosu, A. and Nebelsick, J.H. 2017. Ecomorphological and taphonomic gradients in clypeasteroid-dominated echi- noid assemblages along a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate shelf from the early Miocene of northern Sardinia, Italy. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 627–646. Clypeasteroid echinoids are widespread and abundant within Miocene sedimentary sequences of the Mediterranean area within both siliciclastic and carbonate deposits. Herein, three clypeasteroid-dominated echinoid assemblages from the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate succession of the Mores Formation (lower Miocene) cropping out within the Porto Torres Basin (northern Sardinia) are described. These assemblages were compared to previously described clypeasteroid-bear- ing deposits from the Miocene of northern Sardinia with the purpose of investigating their palaeoecology and taphon- omy along a shelf gradient. These goals are accomplished by various methods including (i) logging sedimentary facies, (ii) analysing the functional morphology of sea urchin skeletons, (iii) comparing the relative abundance of taxa and taphonomic features, and (iv) studying associated fauna, flora, and trace fossils. The clypeasteroid-bearing deposits differ greatly with respect to echinoid diversity, accompanying fauna and flora, sedimentological signatures, and taphonomic features. They also show variations in depositional environments and the mechanism of formation of the deposits. Three different shelf settings are distinguished: littoral, inner sublittoral, and outer sublittoral environments. Furthermore, an ecomorphological gradient along the shelf is recognized with respect to echinoid taxa and their morphologies. This gradient ranges from shallow water to a moderately deep shelf and is interpreted with respect to both abiotic and biotic factors as well as the taphonomy of the echinoid tests.
    [Show full text]