Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision of the geologic column................................. 23 Systems....................................................... 23 Formations................................................... 23 Fossils............................................................ 24 Nature and geologic distribution............................... 24 Importance.................................................... 24 Paleontologic units............................................. 25 Geology of the Coastal Plain................................................ 25 General features....................................................... 25 Stratigraphy of the Coastal Plain in eastern Texas....................... 26 Rock systems represented.......................................... 26 Carboniferous rocks................................................ 26 Cretaceous rocks................................................... 26 Tertiary and Quaternary rocks..................................... 27 Tertiary system................................................... 29 Eocene series................................................. 29 Midway formation........................................ 29 Name and correlations................................. 29 Occurrence and character...................... t ....... 31 Relations to adjacent formations........................ 31 Paleontology......................................... 32 Detailed sections....................................... 38 Brazos River section.............................. 88 Falls County,.................................... 35 Limestone County................................. 85 Kaufman County.................................. 36 Van Zandt County................................ 36 3 ' 4 CONTENTS. Geology of the Coastal Plain Continued. Stratigraphy of the Coastal Plain in eastern Texas Continued. Tertiary system Continued. Eocene series Continued. Page. Wilcox formation.......................................... 37 Name and correlation.................................. 37 Occurrence and character.............................. 39 Paleontology......................................... 40 Detailed sections...................................... 41 Brazos Eiver section.............................. 41 North of the Brazos............................... 44 Northeast Texas................................... 44 Sabine Eiver section.............................. 46 Claiborne group............................................ 51 Mount Selman formation............................... 51 Name and correlation.............................. 51 Occurrence and character.......................... 52 Paleontology..................................... 52 Detailed sections.................................. 52 Brazos River section.......................... 52 Trinity River section.......................... 52 Cherokee County section....................... 53 Harrison County section........................ 54 Sabine River section.......................... 55 Cook Mountain formation.............................. 56 Name and correlation.............................. 56 Occurrence and character.......................... 56 Paleontology..................................... 56 Detailed sections.................................. 56 Brazos River section.......................... 56 Trinity River section.......................... 60 Cherokee County section....................... 62 Sabine River section.......................... 64 Yegua formation...................................... 65 Name and correlation. .......................*...... 65 Occurrence and character.......................... 66 Detailed sections.................................. 66 Brazos River section.......................... 66 Sabine River section.......................... 67 Jackson formation.......................................... 67 Name and correlation.................................. 67 Occurrence and character.............................. 67 Paleontology......................................... 67 Detailed sections...................................... 68 Sabine River section.............................. 68 Oligocene series................................................ 68 Catahoula sandstone (including some Eocene)............... 68 Nameand correlation.................................. 68 Occurrence and character...,............--.-...---...- 70 Detailed sections...................................... 70 Sabine River section.............................. 70 San Augustine County.............................. 70 Tyler County...................................... 70 Polk County....................................... 71 Brazos County..................................... 71 CONTENTS. 5 Geology of the Coastal Plain Continued. Stratigraphy of the Coastal Plain in Eastern Texas Continued. Tertiary system Continued. Page. Miocene series................................................. 72 Fleming clay.............................................. 72 Name and correlation.................................. 72 Occurrence and character.............................. 74 Detailed sections...................................... 74 Sabine River section.............................. 74 Neches River section............................... 74 Grimes and Brazos counties......................... 74 Dewitt formation (including some Pliocene).................. 74 Name and correlation.................................. 74 Occurrence and character.............................. 75 Paleontology........................................... 75 Detailed sections....................................... 75 East of Brazos River.............................. 75 West of Brazos River.............................. 75 Marine Miocene (probably including some early Pliocene)... 76 General character..................................... 76 Details of occurrence................................... 76 Pliocene series................................................ 77 Uvalde formation.......................................... 77 Name and correlation.................................. 77 Occurrence and character.............................. .77 Quaternary system................................................. 78 Pleistocene series............................................. 78 Lissie gravel.............................................. 78 Name and correlation.................................. 78 Occurrence and character.............................. 78 Paleontology........................................... 80 Details of occurrence................................... 80 Beaumont clay............................................ 80 Name................................................ 80 Occurrence and character.............................. 81 Paleontology........................................... 81 Pleistocene terrace deposits................................ 81 Highest Pleistocene terrace............................ 81 Middle Pleistocene terrace............................ 82 Lowest Pleistocene terrace............................ 83 Recent series.................................................. 83 Structure............................................................ 84 General features................................................... 84 Domes........................................................... 84 Angelina-Caldwell flexure......................................... 85 Cooks Springs-Caddo fault and flexure............................. 86 Minor flexures..................................................... 86 Sabine uplift..................................................... 86 Hydrology................................................................ 87 Definitions........................................................... 87 Occurrence of ground water............................................ 87 Source of ground water............................................ 87 Zone of saturation................................................ 87 Movement of ground water.......................................
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History And
    Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths Frédéric Delsuc, Melanie Kuch, Gillian Gibb, Emil Karpinski, Dirk Hackenberger, Paul Szpak, Jorge Martinez, Jim Mead, H. Gregory Mcdonald, Ross Macphee, et al. To cite this version: Frédéric Delsuc, Melanie Kuch, Gillian Gibb, Emil Karpinski, Dirk Hackenberger, et al.. Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths. Current Biology - CB, Elsevier, 2019. hal-02326384 HAL Id: hal-02326384 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02326384 Submitted on 22 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Ancient Mitogenomes Shed Light on the Evolutionary 2 History and Biogeography of Sloths 3 Frédéric Delsuc,1,13,*, Melanie Kuch,2 Gillian C. Gibb,1,3, Emil Karpinski,2,4 Dirk 4 Hackenberger,2 Paul Szpak,5 Jorge G. Martínez,6 Jim I. Mead,7,8 H. Gregory 5 McDonald,9 Ross D. E. MacPhee,10 Guillaume Billet,11 Lionel Hautier,1,12 and 6 Hendrik N. Poinar2,* 7 Author list footnotes 8 1Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geology of Cenozoic Deposits, Gulf Coastal Plain, South-Central United States
    REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY AND _^ SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF CENOZOIC DEPOSITS, GULF COASTAL PLAIN, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES V U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Taphonomy and Significance of Jefferson's Ground Sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 61 Number 1 Article 9 1-29-2001 Taphonomy and significance of Jefferson's ground sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah H. Gregory McDonald Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Hagerman, Idaho Wade E. Miller Thomas H. Morris Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation McDonald, H. Gregory; Miller, Wade E.; and Morris, Thomas H. (2001) "Taphonomy and significance of Jefferson's ground sloth (Xenarthra: Megalonychidae) from Utah," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 61 : No. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol61/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 61(1), © 2001, pp. 64–77 TAPHONOMY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF JEFFERSON’S GROUND SLOTH (XENARTHRA: MEGALONYCHIDAE) FROM UTAH H. Gregory McDonald1, Wade E. Miller2, and Thomas H. Morris2 ABSTRACT.—While a variety of mammalian megafauna have been recovered from sediments associated with Lake Bonneville, Utah, sloths have been notably rare. Three species of ground sloth, Megalonyx jeffersonii, Paramylodon har- lani, and Nothrotheriops shastensis, are known from the western United States during the Pleistocene. Yet all 3 are rare in the Great Basin, and the few existing records are from localities on the basin margin. The recent discovery of a partial skeleton of Megalonyx jeffersonii at Point-of-the-Mountain, Salt Lake County, Utah, fits this pattern and adds to our understanding of the distribution and ecology of this extinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Otoliths from the Late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay (Texas, Usa)
    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 126(2): 395-446. July 2020 FISH OTOLITHS FROM THE LATE MAASTRICHTIAN KEMP CLAY (TEXAS, USA) AND THE EARLY DANIAN CLAYTON FORMATION (ARKANSAS, USA) AND AN ASSESSMENT OF EXTINCTION AND SURVIVAL OF TELEOST LINEAGES ACROSS THE K-PG BOUNDARY BASED ON OTOLITHS WERNER SCHWARZHANS*1 & GARY L. STRINGER2 1Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Ahrensburger Weg 103, D-22359 Hamburg, Germany, [email protected] 2 Museum of Natural History, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana 71209, USA, [email protected] *Corresponding author To cite this article: Schwarzhans W. & Stringer G.L. (2020) - Fish otoliths from the late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay (Texas, USA) and the early Danian Clayton Formation (Arkansas, USA) and an assessment of extinction and survival of teleost lineages across the K-Pg boundary based on otoliths. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 126(2): 395-446. Keywords: K-Pg boundary event; Gadiformes; Heterenchelyidae; otolith; extinction; survival. Abstract. Otolith assemblages have rarely been studied across the K-Pg boundary. The late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay of northeastern Texas and the Fox Hills Formation of North Dakota, and the early Danian Clayton Formation of Arkansas therefore offer new insights into how teleost fishes managed across the K-Pg boundary as reconstructed from their otoliths. The Kemp Clay contains 25 species, with 6 new species and 2 in open nomenclature and the Fox Hills Formation contains 4 species including 1 new species. The two otolith associations constitute the Western Interior Seaway (WIS) community.
    [Show full text]
  • B-50 Geology of the Coastal Plain of East Central Georgia
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN NUMBER 50- PART 1 GEOLOGY OF THE COASTAL PLAIN OF EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA By PHILIP E. LA MOREAUX Geologist United States Geological Survey Published in cooperation with United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey, Washing.ton, D. C. ATLANTA 1946 I LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY ATLANTA, February 15, 1946. His Excellency, Ellis Arnall, Governor Commissioner Ex-Officio, State Division of Conservation Through The Honorable Nelson M. Shipp, Assistant Commissioner SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin No. 50, Part I, "Geology of the Coastal Plain of East-Central Georgia." This is the first in a series of bulletins under this title. Others will be published from time to time until all of the Cretaceous area in the State has been mapped. The geology of east central Georgia, the area covered in this report, influences in three essential ways the economy of the State: The Tuscaloosa formation consists of thick beds of sand and gravel that are excellent aquifers. These water-bearing beds will furnish large additional quantities of water of good quality for industrial and municipal uses throughout a belt of 10 to 30 miles in width along the northern mar­ gin of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. Georgia produces approximately 80 per cent of the national output of kaolin. The major portion of this production is from deposits described in this report in Washington, Wilkinson a:nd Twiggs counties. Other com­ mercial minerals mined in this area include bauxite, fuller's earth, lime­ stone, and sand and gravel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignite and the Midway-Wilcox Stratigraphic Boundary, Alabama and Mississippi By
    Lignite and the Midway-WIlcox Stratigraphic Boundary, Alabama and Mississippi By C. R. Meissner, Jr. and S. E. Heermann 1982 Open-file Report 82-673 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and Stratigraphic nomenclature. Introduction The boundary between the Midway Group of Paleocene age and the overlying Wilcox Group of Paleocene - Lower Eocene age needs clarification in the border area along east-central Mississippi and west-central Alabama. A lignite bed described in the Oak Hill Member of the Naheola Formation, upper Midway Group, in Alabama (Daniels, 1973) appears to be the same bed as that described in the Fearn Springs Member of the Nanafalia Formation, lower Wilcox Group, just across the border in Mississippi (Foster, 1940). If the lignite bed actually is continuous from Alabama into Mississippi, then it is Impossible for it to cross a major stratigraphic boundary such as that between the Midway and Wilcox Groups, especially since this boundary has been described as a major unconformity (Hughes, 1958). The U.S. Geological Survey Lexicon of Geologic Names of the United States from 1936-1960 (Keroher and others, 1966) cites eight authors, none of whom completely agree on the definition of the Fearn Springs Member and its stratigraphic position. MacNeil (1946) gives the option of three different positions for the Midway-Wilcox boundary, one at the base of the Naheola Formation (upper Midway), one at the base of the Coal Bluff member of the Naheola, and one at the base of the Fearn Springs Member of the Nanafalia Formation (lower Wilcox) (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Late Paleocene Early Eocene Wilcox Group, East-Central Texas
    U-PB DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE LATE PALEOCENE EARLY EOCENE WILCOX GROUP, EAST-CENTRAL TEXAS A Thesis by PRESTON JAMES WAHL Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Thomas E. Yancey Co-Chair of Committee, Mike Pope Committee Members, Brent V. Miller Walter Ayers Head of Department, Rick Giardino August 2015 Major Subject: Geology Copyright 2015 Preston James Wahl ABSTRACT Sediment delivery to Texas and the northwestern Gulf of Mexico during the Early Paleogene represents an initial cycle of tectonic-influenced deposition that corresponds with the timing of late Laramide uplift. Sediments shed from Laramide uplifts to east- central Texas and the northwestern Gulf of Mexico during this time are preserved in strata of the Wilcox Group and lower Claiborne Group. U-Pb dating of detrital zircons from closely spaced stratigraphic units within these groups and the underlying Midway Group by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) reveals the relative arrival time of late Laramide-age detrital zircons to east-central Texas and distinct detrital zircon age assemblages. Comparison of zircon age assemblages from this study with data from potential source regions and additional Wilcox and Claiborne Group samples along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coastal Plain provides insight into paleodrainage during the Early Paleogene. The relative arrival time of late Laramide-age detrital zircons to east-central Texas corresponds with deposition of the Hooper Formation of the Wilcox Group, although the presence of these detrital zircons fluctuates within younger samples.
    [Show full text]
  • A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 90 Number Article 6 1983 A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa H. Gregory McDonald Idaho State University Duane C. Anderson University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1983 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation McDonald, H. Gregory and Anderson, Duane C. (1983) "A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 90(4), 134-140. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol90/iss4/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. McDonald and Anderson: A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Megalonyx) Cranium from Turin, Mon Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 90(4): 134-140. 1983 A Well-Preserved Ground Sloth (Mega/onyx) Cranium from Turin, Monona County, Iowa H. GREGORY McDONALD 1 Idaho Museum of Natural History, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209 DUANE C. ANDERSON State Archaeologist, Univeristy of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 A well-preserved cranium of a large Pleistocene ground sloth (Mega/onyx jeffersonii) is described in detail and compared with six other North American Mega/onyx crania. Although the morphology of the Iowa specimen compares favorably with all others, the descending flange of the zygomatic arch is unusual in that it is sharply deflected to the posterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Exposures
    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Journal, 8 (2): 315-389
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 315–389 MONOGRAPH Revision of the genus Amphiope L. Agassiz, 1840 (Echinoidea Astriclypeidae) with the description of a new species from the Miocene of France Paolo Stara1& Enrico Borghi2 1Centro Studi di Storia Naturale del Mediterraneo - Museo di Storia Naturale Aquilegia and Geomuseo Monte Arci, Masullas, Oristano, Sardinia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] 2Società Reggiana di Scienze Naturali, Via Tosti 1, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The taxonomy of Amphiope L. Agassiz, 1840 (Echinoidea, Astriclypeidae), an echinoid dis- tributed in the Oligo-Miocene of Central and Southern Europe, is largely unresolved since the description of most species attributed to this genus was based only on the external mor- phological features, while important characters, such as the oral plating and the internal sup- port system, were poorly illustrated or completely omitted. Additionally, the type material of some species was missing or badly preserved and geographical/stratigraphical information about the type-locality was unclear. This was the case also for Amphiope bioculata (Des Moulins, 1837), the type species of the genus. The poor definition of the earlier described species of Amphiope prevented comparison with fossils from other localities and ages, sub- sequently attributed to this genus. A large part of the earlier species of Amphiope, key-taxa for the resolution of the complex taxonomy of this genus, are herein revised by modern meth- ods. For this purpose, the type material available in public institutions has been re-examined and, when possible, new topo-typic material has been collected. As a result, the morphological description of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoproteomics Resolves Sloth Relationships
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0909-z Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships Samantha Presslee1,2,3,24, Graham J. Slater4,24, François Pujos5, Analía M. Forasiepi5, Roman Fischer 6, Kelly Molloy7, Meaghan Mackie3,8, Jesper V. Olsen 8, Alejandro Kramarz9, Matías Taglioretti10, Fernando Scaglia10, Maximiliano Lezcano11, José Luis Lanata 11, John Southon12, Robert Feranec13, Jonathan Bloch14, Adam Hajduk15, Fabiana M. Martin16, Rodolfo Salas Gismondi 17, Marcelo Reguero18, Christian de Muizon19, Alex Greenwood20,21, Brian T. Chait 7, Kirsty Penkman22, Matthew Collins3,23 and Ross D. E. MacPhee2* The living tree sloths Choloepus and Bradypus are the only remaining members of Folivora, a major xenarthran radiation that occupied a wide range of habitats in many parts of the western hemisphere during the Cenozoic, including both continents and the West Indies. Ancient DNA evidence has played only a minor role in folivoran systematics, as most sloths lived in places not conducive to genomic preservation. Here we utilize collagen sequence information, both separately and in combination with published mitochondrial DNA evidence, to assess the relationships of tree sloths and their extinct relatives. Results from phylo- genetic analysis of these datasets differ substantially from morphology-based concepts: Choloepus groups with Mylodontidae, not Megalonychidae; Bradypus and Megalonyx pair together as megatherioids, while monophyletic Antillean sloths may be sister to all other folivorans. Divergence estimates are consistent with fossil evidence for mid-Cenozoic presence of sloths in the West Indies and an early Miocene radiation in South America. he sloths (Xenarthra, Folivora), nowadays a taxonomically consensus8–10,16,17 in morphology-based phylogenetic treatments is narrow (six species in two genera) component of the fauna of to place the three-toed sloth as sister to all other folivorans (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Fossil Invertebrates 2 (Pdf)
    FLORIDA FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES Parl2 JANUARY 2OO2 SINGLE ISSUE: $z.OO OLIGOCENE AND MIOCENE ECHINOIDS CRAIG W. OYEN1 and ROGER W. PORTELL, lDeparlment of Geography and Earth Science Shippensburg U niversity 1871 Old Main Drive Shippensburg, PA 17257 -2299 e-mail: cwoyen @ ark.ship.edu 2Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida P. O. Box 117800 Gainesville, FL 32611 -7800 e-mail: portell @flmnh.ufl.edu A PUBLICATTON OF THE FLORTDA PALEONTOLOGTCAL SOCIETY tNC. r,q)-.'^ .o$!oLo"€n)- .l^\ z*- il--'t- ' .,vn\'9t\ x\\I ^".{@^---M'Wa*\/i w*'"'t:.&-.d te\ 3t tu , l ". (. .]tt f-w#wlW,/ \;,6'#,/ FLORIDA FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES tssN 1536-5557 Florida Fossil lnvertebrafes is a publication of the Florida Paleontological Society, Inc., and is intended as a guide for identification of the many, common, invertebrate fossils found around the state. lt will deal solely with named species; no new taxonomic work will be included. Two parts per year will be completed with the first three parts discussing echinoids. Part 1 (published June 2001) covered Eocene echinoids, Parl2 (January 2002 publication) is about Oligocene and Miocene echinoids, and Part 3 (June 2002 publication) will be on Pliocene and Pleistocene echinoids. Each issue will be image-rich and, whenever possible, specimen images will be at natural size (1x). Some of the specimens figured in this series soon will be on display at Powell Hall, the museum's Exhibit and Education Center. Each part of the series will deal with a specific taxonomic group (e.9., echinoids) and contain a brief discussion of that group's life history along with the pertinent geological setting.
    [Show full text]