DOCSLIB.ORG

U-Pb Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Late Paleocene Early Eocene Wilcox Group, East-Central Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U-Pb Detrital Zircon Geochronology of the Late Paleocene Early Eocene Wilcox Group, East-Central Texas U-PB DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE LATE PALEOCENE EARLY EOCENE WILCOX GROUP, EAST-CENTRAL TEXAS A Thesis by PRESTON JAMES WAHL Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Thomas E. Yancey Co-Chair of Committee, Mike Pope Committee Members, Brent V. Miller Walter Ayers Head of Department, Rick Giardino August 2015 Major Subject: Geology Copyright 2015 Preston James Wahl ABSTRACT Sediment delivery to Texas and the northwestern Gulf of Mexico during the Early Paleogene represents an initial cycle of tectonic-influenced deposition that corresponds with the timing of late Laramide uplift. Sediments shed from Laramide uplifts to east- central Texas and the northwestern Gulf of Mexico during this time are preserved in strata of the Wilcox Group and lower Claiborne Group. U-Pb dating of detrital zircons from closely spaced stratigraphic units within these groups and the underlying Midway Group by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) reveals the relative arrival time of late Laramide-age detrital zircons to east-central Texas and distinct detrital zircon age assemblages. Comparison of zircon age assemblages from this study with data from potential source regions and additional Wilcox and Claiborne Group samples along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coastal Plain provides insight into paleodrainage during the Early Paleogene. The relative arrival time of late Laramide-age detrital zircons to east-central Texas corresponds with deposition of the Hooper Formation of the Wilcox Group, although the presence of these detrital zircons fluctuates within younger samples. Comparison of composite detrital zircon age spectra from sediment source regions and from locations along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coastal Plain shows that source regions contain unique distributions of ages, with age components that are similar to Gulf Coastal Plain data. Detrital zircon age data may support relatively similar sediment sources or a similar paleodrainage area for the majority of observed ages within the Midway Group, Wilcox ii Group, and Carrizo Formation in east-central Texas. Louisiana Wilcox Group and east- central Texas (Tehuacana Member through Carrizo Formation) data are similar and contrast with data of the south Texas Wilcox Group. This may support similar paleodrainage for Louisiana and east-central Texas and a different paleodrainage to the south Texas area. Data may also support the introduction of a new sediment source or a greater contribution of detrital zircons from an already existing source by the time of Queen City Formation (lower Claiborne Group) deposition in east-central Texas. Comparison of Louisiana Claiborne Group data with east-central Texas Queen City Formation data indicates that this source was also available during deposition of younger Claiborne Group strata in Louisiana. iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents, Dwayne and Sharon Wahl, and my brothers, Billy and Michael. Sharon, thank you for seeing the geologist in me at an early age and never giving up on me. Thank you for all the music lessons and trips to the bookstore, for teaching me to play chess, and for letting me dig through rock piles outside the grocery store in Bismarck. Dwayne, thank you for passing on to me a work ethic that knows no end, and for teaching me that dedication and passion for your work truly pays off. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chairs, Drs. Thomas Yancey and Mike Pope, and my committee members, Drs. Brent Miller and Walt Ayers, for their support during my time at Texas A&M University. Thanks are also due to Dr. Ray Guillemette for assistance with cathodoluminescence and backscatter electron imaging, and to Luz Romero for her help during the data collection and processing stages of this study. I also would like to extend my gratitude to ConocoPhillips, Marathon Oil, and the South Texas Geological Society for providing fellowship support for my education and research. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 CHAPTER II GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ................................................................6 CHAPTER III METHODS .........................................................................................10 CHAPTER IV DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY ........................................ 18 Fractionation and Secondary Zircon Standards .......................................... 18 East-Central Texas Data .............................................................................21 East-Central Texas Results and Discussion ............................................... 29 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test ..........................................................................35 CHAPTER V SOURCE REGIONS AND GULF COASTAL PLAIN LOCATIONS ...... 39 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................53 Recommendations for Future Study ............................................................54 REFERENCES CITED .............................................................................................55 APPENDIX A ...........................................................................................................78 APPENDIX B .........................................................................................................117 APPENDIX C .........................................................................................................126 APPENDIX D .........................................................................................................139 APPENDIX E .........................................................................................................185 APPENDIX F .........................................................................................................198 APPENDIX G .........................................................................................................213 APPENDIX H .........................................................................................................215 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page 1 Generalized stratigraphic column for east-central Texas showing stratigraphic levels of sampling .....................................................................4 2 Location of samples collected between the Trinity and Colorado Rivers in east-central Texas..........................................................................5 3 Stylized average thickness column for lithostratigraphic units in east-central Texas between the Trinity and Colorado Rivers ........................ 9 4 Arrangement of detrital zircon samples, primary standards, secondary standards, and NIST glass standards in an epoxy puck ............ 12 5 Detrital zircon grain map example ...............................................................14 6 Fractionation factor and secondary zircon standard 206Pb/238U ages ........... 18 7 Normalized probability density plots and associated histograms for east-central Texas detrital zircon samples ............................................. 23 8 GTS (2012) timescale overlain on normalized probability density plots for east-central Texas detrital zircon samples ..................................... 24 9 Normalized probability density plots and associated histograms for east-central Texas detrital zircon samples with ages younger than 300 Ma .......................................................................................................25 10 GTS (2012) timescale overlain on normalized probability density Plots for east-central Texas detrital zircon samples with ages younger than 300 Ma ..................................................................................26 11 Normalized composite probability density plot for QC detrital zircon ages, positioned above a similar style plot and associated histogram for east-central Texas (Teh-CZ) samples .................................................... 28 12 Composite probability density plot for east-central Texas samples with ages younger than 300 Ma ..................................................................28 13 Composite probability density plot with age groups and age labels for detrital zircon ages in east-central Texas ............................................... 30 vii FIGURE Page 14 Normalized probability density plots for each sample with age groups and age labels.................................................................................31 15 Composite probability density plot with associated histograms, age groups, and age labels for all samples in east-central Texas with ages younger than 300 Ma .........................................................................33 16 Normalized probability density plots for each sample with age groups and age labels for ages younger than 300 Ma................................. 34 17 One-sigma absolute error vs. age for all detrital zircon ages within 10% discordance. ......................................................................................38 18 North American basement terranes ............................................................39 19 Paleogeographic reconstructions with inferred paleodrainage pathways during the Late Paleocene and Early Eocene ............................ 41 20 Locations of compiled studies for source regions and Texas and Louisiana Gulf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subsurface Geology of Cenozoic Deposits, Gulf Coastal Plain, South-Central United States
    REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY AND _^ SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF CENOZOIC DEPOSITS, GULF COASTAL PLAIN, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES V U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene–Early Miocene Paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano Based on Widespread Ash-Flow Tuffs and P
    Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane themed issue Eocene–Early Miocene paleotopography of the Sierra Nevada–Great Basin–Nevadaplano based on widespread ash-fl ow tuffs and paleovalleys Christopher D. Henry1, Nicholas H. Hinz1, James E. Faulds1, Joseph P. Colgan2, David A. John2, Elwood R. Brooks3, Elizabeth J. Cassel4, Larry J. Garside1, David A. Davis1, and Steven B. Castor1 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA 3California State University, Hayward, California 94542, USA 4Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604, USA ABSTRACT the great volume of erupted tuff and its erup- eruption fl owed similar distances as the mid- tion after ~3 Ma of nearly continuous, major Cenozoic tuffs at average gradients of ~2.5–8 The distribution of Cenozoic ash-fl ow tuffs pyroclastic eruptions near its caldera that m/km. Extrapolated 200–300 km (pre-exten- in the Great Basin and the Sierra Nevada of probably fi lled in nearby topography. sion) from the Pacifi c Ocean to the central eastern California (United States) demon- Distribution of the tuff of Campbell Creek Nevada caldera belt, the lower gradient strates that the region, commonly referred and other ash-fl ow tuffs and continuity of would require elevations of only 0.5 km for to as the Nevadaplano, was an erosional paleovalleys demonstrates that (1) the Basin valley fl oors and 1.5 km for interfl uves. The highland that was drained by major west- and Range–Sierra Nevada structural and great eastward, upvalley fl ow is consistent and east-trending rivers, with a north-south topographic boundary did not exist before with recent stable isotope data that indicate paleodivide through eastern Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Arundo Donax on Southern California River Processes
    EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER PROCESSES PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY FINAL DRAFT Submitted to: California Invasive Plant Council 14442-A Walnut Street, #462 Berkeley, CA 94709 Prepared by: northwest hydraulic consultants inc 3950 Industrial Blvd. #100C West Sacramento, CA 95691 Contact: Robert C. MacArthur, Principal Phone: (916) 371-7400 [email protected] Submitted on: January 26, 2011 File 50615 nhc Report Prepared by: ______________________________ Robert C. MacArthur, Ph.D., P.E., Project Manager ______________________________ René Leclerc, Geomorphologist ______________________________ Ken Rood, P.Geo, Geomorphologist _______________________________ Ed Wallace, P.E., Principal Engineer DISCLAIMER This document has been prepared by northwest hydraulic consultants in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and is intended for the exclusive use and benefit of the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and their authorized representatives for specific application to their Southern California Arundo Donax Project. The contents of this document are not to be relied upon or used, in whole or in part, by or for the benefit of others without specific written authorization from northwest hydraulic consultants. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. northwest hydraulic consultants and its officers, directors, employees, and agents assume no responsibility for the reliance upon this document or any of its contents by any parties other
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Otoliths from the Late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay (Texas, Usa)
    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 126(2): 395-446. July 2020 FISH OTOLITHS FROM THE LATE MAASTRICHTIAN KEMP CLAY (TEXAS, USA) AND THE EARLY DANIAN CLAYTON FORMATION (ARKANSAS, USA) AND AN ASSESSMENT OF EXTINCTION AND SURVIVAL OF TELEOST LINEAGES ACROSS THE K-PG BOUNDARY BASED ON OTOLITHS WERNER SCHWARZHANS*1 & GARY L. STRINGER2 1Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Ahrensburger Weg 103, D-22359 Hamburg, Germany, [email protected] 2 Museum of Natural History, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana 71209, USA, [email protected] *Corresponding author To cite this article: Schwarzhans W. & Stringer G.L. (2020) - Fish otoliths from the late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay (Texas, USA) and the early Danian Clayton Formation (Arkansas, USA) and an assessment of extinction and survival of teleost lineages across the K-Pg boundary based on otoliths. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 126(2): 395-446. Keywords: K-Pg boundary event; Gadiformes; Heterenchelyidae; otolith; extinction; survival. Abstract. Otolith assemblages have rarely been studied across the K-Pg boundary. The late Maastrichtian Kemp Clay of northeastern Texas and the Fox Hills Formation of North Dakota, and the early Danian Clayton Formation of Arkansas therefore offer new insights into how teleost fishes managed across the K-Pg boundary as reconstructed from their otoliths. The Kemp Clay contains 25 species, with 6 new species and 2 in open nomenclature and the Fox Hills Formation contains 4 species including 1 new species. The two otolith associations constitute the Western Interior Seaway (WIS) community.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Source-To-Sink Analysis of the Provenance of the California Paleoriver: Implications for the Early Eocene Paleog
    PROBABILISTIC SOURCE-TO-SINK ANALYSIS OF THE PROVENANCE OF THE CALIFORNIA PALEORIVER: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EARLY EOCENE PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA by Evan Rhys Jones A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: _____________________________ Evan Jones Signed: _____________________________ Dr. Piret Plink-Björklund Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: _____________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Interim Department Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Latest Paleocene to Early Eocene Colton and Wasatch Formations exposed in the Roan Cliffs on the southern margin of the Uinta Basin, UT make up a genetically related lobate wedge of dominantly fluvial deposits. Estimates of the size of the river that deposited this wedge of sediment vary by more than an order of magnitude. Some authors suggest the sediments are locally derived from Laramide Uplifts that define the southern margin of the Uinta Basin, the local recycling hypotheses. Other authors suggest the sediments were transported by a river system with headwaters 750 km south of the Uinta Basin, the California paleoriver hypothesis. This study uses source-to-sink analysis to constrain the size of the river system that deposited the Colton-Wasatch Fm. We pay particular attention to the what magnitude and recurrence interval of riverine discharge is preserved in the Colton-Wasatch Fm. stratigraphy, and consider the effects this has on scaling discharge to the paleo-catchment area of the system. We develop new scaling relationships between discharge and catchment area using daily gauging data from 415 rivers worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignite and the Midway-Wilcox Stratigraphic Boundary, Alabama and Mississippi By
    Lignite and the Midway-WIlcox Stratigraphic Boundary, Alabama and Mississippi By C. R. Meissner, Jr. and S. E. Heermann 1982 Open-file Report 82-673 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and Stratigraphic nomenclature. Introduction The boundary between the Midway Group of Paleocene age and the overlying Wilcox Group of Paleocene - Lower Eocene age needs clarification in the border area along east-central Mississippi and west-central Alabama. A lignite bed described in the Oak Hill Member of the Naheola Formation, upper Midway Group, in Alabama (Daniels, 1973) appears to be the same bed as that described in the Fearn Springs Member of the Nanafalia Formation, lower Wilcox Group, just across the border in Mississippi (Foster, 1940). If the lignite bed actually is continuous from Alabama into Mississippi, then it is Impossible for it to cross a major stratigraphic boundary such as that between the Midway and Wilcox Groups, especially since this boundary has been described as a major unconformity (Hughes, 1958). The U.S. Geological Survey Lexicon of Geologic Names of the United States from 1936-1960 (Keroher and others, 1966) cites eight authors, none of whom completely agree on the definition of the Fearn Springs Member and its stratigraphic position. MacNeil (1946) gives the option of three different positions for the Midway-Wilcox boundary, one at the base of the Naheola Formation (upper Midway), one at the base of the Coal Bluff member of the Naheola, and one at the base of the Fearn Springs Member of the Nanafalia Formation (lower Wilcox) (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogene: Paleocene) Of
    Cainozoic Research, 8(1-2), pp. 13-28, December2011 Chondrichthyans from the Clayton Limestone Unit of the Midway Group (Paleogene: Paleocene) of Hot Spring County, Arkansas, USA ¹, ² Martin+A. Becker Lauren+C. Smith¹ & John+A. Chamberlain+Jr. 1 Department ofEnvironmentalScience, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey 07470; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department ofGeology, Brooklyn College andDoctoralProgram in Earth and EnvironmentalSciences, City University ofNew YorkGraduate Center, New York 10016; email:[email protected] Received 7 September 2010; revised version accepted 26 June 2011 LimestoneUnit of The Clayton the Midway Group (Paleocene) in southwestern Arkansas preserves one ofthe oldest chondrichthyan Cenozoic from the Gulf Coastal Plainofthe United assemblages yet reported States. Present are at least eight taxa, including; Odontaspis winkleriLeriche, Carcharias cf. whitei Carcharias Anomotodon 1905; (Arambourg, 1952); sp.; novus (Winkler, 1874); Cretalamnasp.; Otodus obliquus Agassiz, 1843; Hypolophodon sylvestris (White, 1931); Myliobatis dixoni Agassiz, 1843; and a chimaeridofindeterminate affiliation.Also present are lamnoid-type and carcharhinoid-type chondrichthyan vertebral centra. The Clayton chondrichthyan assem- blage derives from an outcrop locatedonly a few kilometersfrom a site exposing an assemblage ofMaastrichtianchondrichthyans from Because and the upper Arkadelphia Marl. these assemblages are closely spaced stratigraphically geographically, they provide data on chondrichthyan taxonomic turnover
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) Near Malvern, Arkansas
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-2017 Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas Brenna J. Hart University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hart, Brenna J., "Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas" (2017). Honors Theses. 513. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/513 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi Paleoecological Analysis of the Clayton Formation (Paleocene) near Malvern, Arkansas by Brenna Hart A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Geography and Geology May 2017 II Approved by ________________________________ Franklin Heitmuller, Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of Geography and Geology ________________________________ Mark Puckett, Ph.D., Chair Department of Geography and Geology ________________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College III Abstract The Clayton Formation is a section of the Midway Group immediately above the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary that contains marine fossils from the Paleocene Epoch. The formation is composed of glauconitic sand, clay, marl, and limestone. Fossils within the formation commonly occur in clay or are concentrated in conglomeratic lag lenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision
    [Show full text]
  • New Buccinoid Gastropods from Uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene Strata of California and Baja California, Mexico
    THE NAUTILUS 120(2):66–78, 2006 Page 66 New buccinoid gastropods from uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene strata of California and Baja California, Mexico Richard L. Squires LouElla R. Saul Department of Geological Sciences Invertebrate Paleontology Section California State University, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Northridge, CA 91330–8266 USA County [email protected] 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA [email protected] ABSTRACT better understanding of the relationship between Ornop- sis? n. sp. and “T.” titan. Saul’s Ornopsis? n. sp. is herein Two new genera and three new species of extinct buccinoid assigned to Ornopsis? dysis new species, and its genus gastropods are described and named from the Pacific slope of assignment cannot be made with certainty until more North America. The buccinid? Ornopsis? dysis new species is specimens are found. Ornopsis sensu stricto Wade, 1916, from uppermost Maastrichtian (uppermost Cretaceous) strata heretofore has been reported with certainty only from in the Dip Creek area, San Luis Obispo County, west-central Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian to upper Maas- California. The fasciolarine fasciolarid? Saxituberosa new genus is comprised of the lineage Saxituberosa fons new species, from trichtian) strata of the southeastern United States (Sohl, lower Paleocene (Danian) strata in Los Angeles County, south- 1964). “Trachytriton” titan is herein found to occur in ern California, and Saxituberosa titan (Waring, 1917), from middle Paleocene strata in southern California. Its char- middle Paleocene (Selandian) strata in Ventura and Los Ange- acteristics separate it from the cymatiid Trachytriton les counties, southern California, and northern Baja California, Meek, 1864, and “T.” titan is assigned to Saxituberosa Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Oligocene–Early Miocene Grand Canyon: a Canadian Connection?
    Late Oligocene–early Miocene Grand Canyon: A Canadian connection? James W. Sears, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Montana, (Karlstrom et al., 2012); the river did not reach the Gulf of California Missoula, Montana 59812, USA, [email protected] until 5.3 Ma (Dorsey et al., 2005). Several researchers have con- cluded that an early Miocene Colorado River most likely would ABSTRACT have flowed northwest from a proto–Grand Canyon, because geo- logic barriers blocked avenues to the south and east (Lucchitta et Remnants of fluvial sediments and their paleovalleys may map al., 2011; Cather et al., 2012; Dickinson, 2013). out a late Oligocene–early Miocene “super-river” from headwaters Here I propose that a late Oligocene–early Miocene Colorado in the southern Colorado Plateau, through a proto–Grand Canyon River could have turned north in the Lake Mead region to follow to the Labrador Sea, where delta deposits contain microfossils paleovalleys and rift systems through Nevada and Idaho to the that may have been derived from the southwestern United States. upper Missouri River in Montana. The upper Missouri joined the The delta may explain the fate of sediment that was denuded South Saskatchewan River of Canada before Pleistocene continen- from the southern Colorado Plateau during late Oligocene–early tal ice-sheets deflected it to the Mississippi (Howard, 1958). The Miocene time. South Saskatchewan was a branch of the pre-ice age “Bell River” of I propose the following model: Canada (Fig. 1), which discharged into a massive delta in the 1. Uplift of the Rio Grande Rift cut the southern Colorado Saglek basin of the Labrador Sea (McMillan, 1973; Balkwill et al., Plateau out of the Great Plains at 26 Ma and tilted it to the 1990; Duk-Rodkin and Hughes, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • An Uplift History of the Colorado Plateau and Its Surroundings from Inverse Modeling of Longitudinal River Profiles G
    TECTONICS, VOL. 31, TC4022, doi:10.1029/2012TC003107, 2012 An uplift history of the Colorado Plateau and its surroundings from inverse modeling of longitudinal river profiles G. G. Roberts,1 N. J. White,1 G. L. Martin-Brandis,2 and A. G. Crosby3 Received 10 February 2012; revised 22 June 2012; accepted 27 June 2012; published 16 August 2012. [1] It is generally agreed that a region encompassing the Colorado Plateau has been uplifted by sub-crustal processes. Admittance calculations, tomographic studies and receiver function analyses suggest that dynamic support is generated by some combination of convective upwelling and lithospheric thickness changes. Notwithstanding advances in our understanding of present-day setting, uplift rate histories are poorly constrained and debated: an improved history will aid discrimination between proposed models. Here, we show that a regional uplift rate history can be obtained by inverting longitudinal river profiles. We assume that the shape of a river profile is controlled by uplift rate and moderated by erosion. In our model, uplift rate is allowed to vary smoothly as a function of space and time, upstream drainage area is invariant with time. Simultaneous inversion of river profiles from the Colorado, Rio Grande, Columbia and Mississippi catchments shows that three phases of regional uplift occurred. The first phase occurred between 80 and 50 Myrs, when 1 km of uplift was generated at a rate of 0.03 mm/yr. A second phase occurred between 35 and 15 Myrs, when 1.5 km of uplift was generated at a faster rate of 0.06 mm/yr. A final phase of uplift commenced 5 Myrs ago.
    [Show full text]