DOCSLIB.ORG

Governmental Decision 747-N on the Primary Program of Shelter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governmental Decision 747-N on the Primary Program of Shelter Unofficial translation. GOVERNMENTAL DECISION #747-N (20/05/2004) ON THE PRIMARY PROGRAM OF SHELTER PROVISION FOR REFUGEES DISPLACED FROM AZERBAIJAN IN 1988-1992 In accordance with the activities program of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, having the purpose of providing the refugees displaced from Azerbaijan in 1988-1992 with permanent shelter and taking into consideration the main directions of the on implementation of the strategic program on poverty reduction of the Government of the Republic of Armenia for 2003-2006, the Government of the Republic of Armenia decides: 1. To approve the primary program of shelter provision for refugees displaced form Azerbaijan in 1988-1992 in accordance with Annex 1. 2. To create and approve a coordination commission on meeting the necessary financial means and implementation of the primary program of shelter provision for refugees displaced from Azerbaijan in 1988-1992 in accordance with Annex 2. Annex 1 to the Governmental Decision #747-N (20/05/2004). PRIMARY PROGRAM OF SHELTER PROVISION FOR REFUGEES DISPLACED FROM AZERBAIJAN IN 1988-1992 I. INTRODUCTION From the issues of the refugees who forcibly migrated from Azerbaijan in consequence of the exacerbated ethnic contradictions and ethnic clashes and settled in the Republic of Armenia the issue of their shelter provision is of especial significance for the reason of its acuteness. With the purpose of dealing with this issue the Department on Migration and Refugees under the Government of the Republic of Armenia worked out a corresponding program which was approved with the Declaration # 56 (14/12/2004) of the Government of the Republic of Armenia. This program included shelter issues of all the refugees – victims of ethnic clashes who were forcibly evicted from Azerbaijan and found asylum in Armenia, however, deprived form the permanent shelter, and with the implementation of the program it was planned to solve totally the issue of shelter provision for refugees. However, during the previous three years the program has not been implemented because of the lack of necessary financial means. Taking into the consideration the difficulties of the implementation of such a general program from the perspective of both the large amount of necessary financial means (more than $50.0 million in dram equivalent) and the implementation deadline, it is more expedient not to solve the issue of shelter provision of refugees within one general program, but to divide it according to vulnerability and levels, working out separate corresponding subprograms, the implementation of which is more realistic. The Government of the Republic of Armenia, signifying the necessity of solution of the issue of shelter provision for refugees and proceeding from the mentioned considerations, included a provision on working out and implementation of a program on shelter provision for refugees displaced from the Republic of Azerbaijan and in need of accommodation in its activity program which was approved by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia on 20/06/2003. The issue of working out the primary program for shelter provision of refugees is already included in the list of the measures providing the implementation of the activity program for the year of 2004 of the Government of the Republic of Armenia and proceeds from the strategic program on poverty reduction approved by the Government of the Republic of Armenia. By the decision # 430-A (10/09/2003) of the Prime-Minister of the Republic of Armenia an interdepartmental working group under the guidance of the head of the Department on Migration and Refugees under the Government of the Republic of Armenia was created, which worked out the primary program of shelter provision for refugees displaced from Azerbaijan in 1988-1992 (hereafter the program). II. THE OBSTACLES IN THE PROCESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY ON REFUGEE INTEGRATION In 1988-1992 in consequence of ethnic conflict more than half million Armenians were evicted from the neighboring Azerbaijan within only four years, from who 360.000 settled in the Republic of Armenia. According to the data of the survey conducted in 1997 the number of refugees residing in Armenia exceeded 310.000. From the very first days of the eviction the Government of Armenia and the local authorities conducted large-scale activities on reception, settlement and solution of other primary issues of the refugees. From the mid-1990s, when it became obvious that the safe and volunteering return of refugees in their previous residences is unrealistic, the Government of the Republic of Armenia adopted an integration policy towards them. Various international and public organizations, states and individual donors made their perceptible contribution to this process by implementation of numerous programs on the relief of troubles of refugees and reduction of socio-economic tension in the Republic. Despite the implemented activities the socio-economic conditions of a considerable group of refugees remain alarming. As the surveys show the level of unemployment among refugees is higher than the locals’ by 1.5, the number of businessmen is lower by 1.7, the number of persons with permanent jobs is lower by 3, in terms of availability of educational, health services refugees also yield the locals. The situation is especially alarming in the sphere of shelter provision. Presently about 10.000 refugee families are not provided with permanent shelter. The existence of the mentioned issues hinders the complete implementation of the policy on refugee integration of the Government of the Republic of Armenia. III. THE STATE OF THE SHELTER PROVISION FOR REFUGEES AND THE BASIS FOR THE PROGRAM The greatest obstacle for refugee integration is the shelter issue for the simple explanation that because of living in temporary dwellings lacking the elementary facilities and not having permanent shelter for 15 years after migration to Armenia the psychological feelings of residing in their native-land and establishing there is scarcely noticed among refugees. The truthfulness of the mentioned statement is proven by the reality that in the places of shelter building the mass naturalization among refugees takes place. Today the refugees not provided with permanent shelter are located in hostels, hotels, health resorts, rest-houses, schools, kinder gardens, hospitals, and administrative buildings of institutions and other places of public usage (hereafter temporary dwellings), live in containers, the apartments of relatives, other convenient accommodation or rent apartments. About 40% of the refugee families not provided with permanent shelter reside in temporary dwellings spread throughout the territory of the Republic, part of which is located in land plots. The temporary dwellings belong to various departments, and these dwellings have not been provided with necessary sums for the technical maintenance and service, in consequence of which presently their technical conditions are miserable and do not satisfy the minimal sanitary-hygienic requirements. Part of there buildings is extremely damaged and dangerous to live. In accordance with the program approved by the Governmental Decision # 682 (25/10/2000) “On solving the shelter issues of the residents of damaged buildings in the territory of the Republic of Armenia (except for the residences included in the primary program of the disaster zone reconstruction) subjected to demolition” 214 refugee families residing for 5 years and more in the buildings subjected to demolition and estimated by the Department on Migration and Refugees under the Government of the Republic of Armenia have to be provided with shelters under the state assistance, and 54 families from that number have already been granted such assistance. Until now the issue of shelter provision for refugees has mainly been solved by two ways: on account of the means provided by the state budget of the Republic of Armenia and with financial aid of international organizations. About 300 refugee families were provided with shelter with the means of the budget, and about 3.500 with the means of UNHCR, Governments of Norway and Germany. Unfortunately, state capital investment for shelter building is not considerably high and the problem becomes further complicated by the fact that there are thousands of local families in the Republic, also not provided with shelter. The presence of the unsolved shelter issue is one of the main reasons for the slow pace of the process for refugee integration in the Armenian society despite the similar ethnic background with the local population. The “passive” attitude of refugees towards naturalization in the Republic of Armenia is predetermined by the same reason. Despite the fact that in comparison with the period until 1999, when only 7.000 refugees were naturalized in the Republic of Armenia, during the last 3-4 years the number of naturalized refugees rose considerably and constitutes today about 65.000, the attitude of refugees towards this process still remains not “active”. This condition proves again the truthfulness of the reality that the main obstacle on the way of the refugee integration into society, which is the policy adopted by the Government of the Republic of Armenia concerning the issue of refugees, remains the presence of shelter issue in the line of other socio-economic challenges, which arises justifiable discontent of refugees and may significantly exacerbate the social tensions taking into consideration the proportion of refugees in the total number of the population. The simplest estimates provide evidence that in case of continuation of the shelter building for refugees with the pace of the previous years the issue may be completely solved in 40-50 years. Proceeding from the above-mentioned and taking into consideration the difficulty of solving the shelter issue for refugees within the framework of one program, as well as taking into consideration the general volumes and cost of the issue the present program has been worked out, according to which within 2.5-3 years the shelter provision issue for the most vulnerable families that live in temporary dwellings and containers will be solved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • General Overview of the Local Self
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN ARMENIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ARPINE VARDANYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA MAY 2014 SIGNATURE PAGE Faculty Advisor: Arthur Drampian Date Dean: Douglas Shumavon Date American University of Armenia May 2014 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT AND METHODOLOGY ............................................ 6 BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 6 HYPOTHESES ........................................................................................................................... 9 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ... 19 3.1. ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL DIVISION AND GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY ........................................................................................ 19 3.2. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ..................... 20 3.3. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN ARMENIA ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Gender-Informed Energy Subsidy Reforms: Findings from Qualitative Studies in Europe and Central Asia
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TOWARD GENDER-INFORMED ENERGY SUBSIDY REFORMS: FINDINGS FROM QUALITATIVE STUDIES IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA THE WORLD BANK | 2015 © 2015 The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved. This paper has not undergone the review accorded to official World Bank publications. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone 978-750-8400; fax 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com. Cover photo: Tomislav Georgiev / World Bank TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a River Basin Management Plan for Hrazdan River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 & 3 DEVELOPMENT OF A RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HRAZDAN RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES Version 1, 28 September 2020 APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF THE HRAZDAN BASIN PUBLIC CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES EUWI+ PROJECT: "COMMUNICATION ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN FOR PARTICIPATIVE RBM PLANNING IN ARMENIA" Within the framework of the European Union Water Initiative Plus (EUWI+) programme, the process of developing Hrazdan and Sevan basin management plans started in 2018. The process of public discussion and consultation of the Hrazdan Basin Management Plan took place from 20 June to 20 August 2020. The Water Basin Management Plan is a guidance document developed as a result of collaboration between different stakeholders, offering common solutions to meet the needs of all water users, taking into account also the needs of the environment. Public participation plays a key role in the management plan development process. Questionnaires were used as a key tool in the public discussion and consulting process, through which expert opinions and information were collected to make additions to the water basin management plan. The questionnaires were disseminated through Gegharkunik Marzpetaran, the official website of the Ministry of Environment of the RA, the official website of EUWI+, the social networks of the CWP, as well as various CSO networks. The questionnaire was filled in by local self-government bodies (LSGB) representing 52 communities (57 questionnaires) and by non-governmental stakeholders in the basin – 134 questionnaires .A total of 191 questionnaires were completed.
    [Show full text]
  • High Voltage Electric Networks Cjsc Armenia
    E4525 V1 HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC NETWORKS CJSC ARMENIA Public Disclosure Authorized REHABILITATION OF CHARENTSAVAN-3 SUBSTATION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report Public Disclosure Authorized April 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CHARENTSAVAN-3 SUBSTATION CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 3 3. LEGISLATION ................................................................................................................................... 5 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS ................................................................................................................ 6 5. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................................... 7 6. RESPONSIBILITIES AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................ 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN............................................................................................. 15 7. MINUTES OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION……………………………………………………………………………………….29 2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CHARENTSAVAN-3 SUBSTATION 1. BACKGROUND Additional Financing for Electricity
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment
    Final Draft ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY Municipal Network for Energy Efficiency Armenian Urban Heating Policy Assessment By Arusyak Ghukasyan and Astghine Pasoyan Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF BOXES .......................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................6 1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................8 2 EVOLUTION AND CURRENT STATUS OF ARMENIA’S DISTRICT HEAT SUPPLY SECTOR.....................................................................................................................................................................8 3 HEAT SUPPLY POLICY REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS .............................11 3.1 ARMENIA’S URBAN HEATING STRATEGY ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • AM 15SC Decisions EN.Pdf
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE ON WATER SECTOR ISSUES IN ARMENIA April 26, 2016 Yerevan, Armenia The 15th Meeting of the Steering Committee (SC) of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on Water Sector Issues in Armenia was chaired by Mr. Volodya Narimanyan, Deputy Head of the State Committee on Water Systems (SCWS) of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Armenia. 15th Meetings of the Steering Committee of the NPD on Water Sector Issues in Armenia The objective of the meeting was to discuss the status of NPD activities and recent developments in water sector of Armenia, as well as the progress in implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Armenia. The meeting also served as platform for establishing synergies with other international water projects implemented in Armenia. In the opening session Mr. Narimanyan welcomed the participants of the meeting, and presented the main points of the agenda. The SC members adopted the agenda as it was presented. Opening statement were made by Mr. John Barker from the Delegation of the European Union (EU) to Armenia, Ms. Tatiana Efimova from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Environmental Action Programme (EAP) Task Force Secretariat, and Mr. Peep Mardiste from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). In his remarks Mr. Barker welcomed the participants of the meeting, and stressed the importance of the platform, which the NPD is serving for. He also mentioned about the European Investment Bank loan of 30.7 mln Euro for financing the improvement of the quality and reliability of water supply services and the upgrading of wastewater treatment in Armenia, and the planned grant of 15 mln Euro within the EU Neighbourhood Investment Facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Armenia Additional Services
    3.6 Armenia Additional Services Overview Accommodation Electricity and Power Financial Services HSBC Bank Armenia CJSC ArmBusiness Bank Clearing and Forwarding Agents Handling Equipment Postal and Courier Services Printing and Publishing Taxi Companies Vehicle Rental Waste Management and Disposal Services Overview All the services that might be required for operations are available in Armenia and can be easily contracted. For more information on company contact details, please see the following link:4.11 Armenia Additional Services Contact List Accommodation The availability of accommodation / housing in the country is on a high level. There are many hotels/hostels/bed and breakfast facilities/apartments available for rent in all the regions of Armenia, varying in prices from 100 USD to 3000 USD and above per month. There can be found accommodations that meet minimum criteria regarding security for agencies. There are many ongoing constructions throughout the country (mainly in the capital city Yerevan) and the country has the capacity to house and support a large influx of demand.There are hotels in different regions of Armenia that have been assessed and with which there exist common UN Long Term Agreements. Electricity and Power Armenia has no proven reserves of oil or natural gas and currently imports nearly all gas from Russia. The Iran-Armenia Natural Gas Pipeline has the capacity to provide twice the country's 2008 natural gas consumption and has the potential to provide energy security for Armenia as an alternative to the Russian-dominated imports that flow through the Georgian border. Despite a lack of fossil fuel, Armenia has significant domestic electricity generation resources The main source of electricity in Armenia is Hydropower, Nuclear and Thermal generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Ground Survey
    Chapter 3 Ground Survey Chapter 3 Ground Survey 3.1 Drilling, Laboratory Tests The outline of the lithologic structure in Yerevan can be understood by the geological maps and the collected drilling database, which contains 5,094 logs; however, the data concerning the S wave velocity for the amplification analysis and the soil properties for the liquefaction analysis are not enough. To collect these data, 10 drillings were newly conducted in Yerevan and several tests were conducted using these boreholes. The quantities of the tests are shown in Table 3.1-1. Table 3.1-1 Quantities of Tests Category Quantities Drilling 30m x 10 Groundwater Level Measurement 10 Standard Penetration Test 129 Disturbed Soil Sampling 116 Laboratory Test 116 The drilling points are mainly set to the area where the Quaternary deposits cover because it is effective for the amplification of the earthquake motion by the ground and liquefaction potential. The geologic condition of Yerevan was estimated as follows from the existing information. The rock layer may be shallow in the northern area and the soft soils cover the southern area. Therefore, the selected newly boring points locate in the south of Yerevan city (Figure 3.1-1). The surface soils of each drilling points are shown in Table 3.1-1. The drilling logs are shown in Data Book. The example of drilling log is shown in Figure 3.1-1. 3-1 Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Figure 3.1-1 Location of drilling points Table 3.1-2 Surface geology of the drilling points Quaternary layer Symbol Age No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in Accordance with Article 15 of the Charter
    Strasbourg, 28 June 2019 MIN-LANG (2019) PR 5 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Fifth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter ARMENIA FIFTH PERIODICAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 15 OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Yerevan 2019 2 Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1 ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Practical steps taken at national level, summarising results of the fourth monitoring round of implementation of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Analysis of the situation ................................................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Measures taken and programmes implemented after the Fourth Report submitted by the Republic of Armenia on implementation of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages: Steps taken — by articles ................................................................................................................ 7 Annexes ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]