DOCSLIB.ORG

CBD Sixth National Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CBD Sixth National Report SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use. 4. Elimination of the main causes of biodiversity loss through regulation of intersectoral relations and public awareness raising. 5. Enhancement of scientific research, knowledge management and capacity building in the field of biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. In addition, delivering on the country's obligations under the CBD, and taking into account the ongoing international developments and the ecological and nature conservation related issues present in Armenia, RA Government approved "the Strategy and State Program of Conservation and Use of Specially Protected Nature Areas of the Republic of Armenia" (SPNA SAP) in 2014. The document set the following strategic objectives of development of SPNAs of Armenia, including: 1. Ensuring environmental sustainability and healthy and favorable environment for the population of the country through the development and enhancement of the SPNAs system. 2. Protection of ecological, socio-economic, scientific, educational, recreational and spiritual values of SPNAs that must be undertaken through the conservation, restoration and long-term use of ecosystems, genetic resources, biological and landscape diversity. Based on the provisions of the above-mentioned fundamental documents, national targets (NTs) that are in line with the strategic directions of biodiversity will be presented and discussed in the relevant sections. CHACHAPPPPTERTER 111 INFORMATION RELATING TO THE NATIONAL TARGETS IMPLEMENTED AT NATIONAL LEVEL 3 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Armenia has assumed adequate obligations under the Strategic plan for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use 2011-2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. National Target 1: Enshrine the mechanism of monetarymonetary valuation of biobiodiversitydiversity and ecosystem services in the legislation of the Republic of ArmeniaArmenia.... Logical justification of the target In recent years, both in the world and Armenia, the public interest on the role and value of ecosystems and the improvement of the quality of life through services provided by them has increased dramatically. The use of an ecosystem approach in the decision- making concerning natural resources can help governments, communities and other stakeholders provide many benefits for the land users, landowners and the public. However, currently the values of biodiversity and ESs in Armenia are not fully reflected in decision-making processes and are largely ignored during the country's socio-economic development planning. The incorporation of monetary valuation of the biodiversity and ESs into the economic development and poverty reduction strategies will require their adequate evaluation and enhancement of cooperation between the various stakeholders and the government. Realistic valuation of the ESs will allow evaluating the potential environmental losses expected during the implementation of projects in different areas, considering possible alternatives and choosing the options having the least negative impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity. Depending on the country's capacities, biodiversity and ESs can be evaluated step- by-step. Starting with the values, that are easy to evaluate and proceeding to others. It should be noted, that "Armenia Development Strategy for 2014-2025" approved by the RA Government Decree N 442-N from, March 27, 2014 did not define ESs valuation concept as well as the need to establish a legal basis for it. Consequently, the issue relating to the improvement of the environmental legislation is challenging, since it does not provide for the regulation of processes using the ecosystem approach model, such as the complex planning of environmental and natural 4 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity resource conservation and utilization, enhancing the regeneration capacity of natural resources through best available technologies, and implementation of joint monitoring, management of information systems and ensuring interconnected components of the nature. The need for economic valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services must be legally enforced during planning and implementation of any economic project that affects the natural environment, as well as during assessment of ecological deprivations, while the principles of economic evaluation should be approved by the state. It should be noted that the majority of the population of our country is not well informed about the environmental gains. As a result of implementation of this target the awareness of Armenia's population will contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and ESs. The level of application of this target: National X The llinkinginking between thethethe National Target and Aichi Targets: X 1 6 11 16 X 2 7 12 17 3 8 13 18 4 9 14 19 5 10 15 20 Other Important Information In order to contribute to the implementation of this national target, the following action was included in the BSAP: "1.1 Identify the ecosystem services cost estimation methodology and test it in specially protected nature areas "and in the SPNA -SAP" 5 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity Evaluating the benefits received from services provided by the ecosystems of the SPNAs and raising awareness about ESS within the local population’’. This will create prerequisites for a realistic assessment of the value of the ESs, as well as enhancing the role and significance of SPNAs through the improvement of natural resources use management mechanisms. Relevant web sites, links and files www.arlis.am ; www.mnp.am National Target 22: Define the mechanisms for the assessassessinging biological resources and determining thetheiriririr use quantities; improveimprovementment of the bioresources management systemsystem.... Logical justification of the target In Armenia, biological resources are widely exploited (use of subalpine and alpine meadows as natural pastures, harvesting of edible and medicinal herbs, berries, hunting and etc.) and in some cases overexploited (forest resources, fishing). At the same time, the use of bio resources has essentially been carried out spontaneously without taking into consideration the natural reproduction potential of the resources and the necessary preconditions for ensuring it. A vivid example of overexploitation is the drastic reduction of fish stocks in the Lake Sevan, particularly the whitefish stock, which is in fact a result of mismanagement and ignoration of scientific justifications. The collapse of the whitefish population in the lake is explained by the unprecedented scales of poaching and breach of hunting rules, due to which, despite the ban on hunting of that fish, the individuals that have not yet reached maturity were captured. The improvement of the living conditions of the population are to be ensured through the use of such renewable natural resources in the economic activities that exclude their depletion and guarantee their recovery for the benefit of future generations. Non-wood forest use by the local population often occurs irregularly, disturbing the natural state of forest biodiversity, reducing the number of beneficial plant populations and the ecosystem integrity. Forest management plans developed for the forestry 6 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity enterprises do not contain planned activities on ensuring the migration of animals, determination of the amount of bio-resources subject to inventory and use, as well as on sustainable non-wood forest use. Forest inventory, maintenance of forest cadastre and biodiversity monitoring, as well as special forestry studies are inadequately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Benedict XVI on Christian Love Represents The
    Caritas Armenia Benevolent Non-Govermental Organization of the Armenian Catholic Church & its 9 CENTERS §When you did it to these my brothers you were doing it to me¦ (Mt. 25:40) Gyumri 2016 The following passage from the Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate ( §Charity in Truth¦) of Benedict XVI on Christian love represents the basis of the Mission of Armenian Caritas, which states: §Serve different vulnerable groups with love and compassion, respecting 1995-2015 the dignity of each individual.¦ 20 YEARS IN ARMENIA §Love- caritas- will always prove necessary. Love is therefore A SHIELD FROM THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES AN ANNUAL JOURNEY WITH 3,000 BENEFICIARIES THROUGH ITS the service that the Church carries out in order to attend constantly 9 CENTERS to man°s sufferings and his material needs. We contribute to a better GYUMRI DAY CARE CENTER FOR THE OLDER PEOPLE world by personally doing the good with full commitment. We are an immense service of charity towards neighbor. Love is the light that can “EMILI AREGAK” DAY CARE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH WITH MULTIPLE DISABILITIES always illuminate a world grown dim and give us the courage needed to GYUMRI “LITTLE PRINCE” SOCIAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN keep living and working.¦ GYUMRI PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER GYUMRI HANDICRAFT WORKSHOP FOR WOMEN VANADZOR “LITTLE PRINCE” SOCIAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ENCYCLICAL LETTER CARITAS IN VERITATE TASHIR DAY CARE CENTER FOR THE OLDER PEOPLE OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF BENEDICT XVI ON INTEGRAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHARITY AND TRUTH TASHIR “LITTLE PRINCE” SOCIAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN GAVAR “LITTLE PRINCE” SOCIAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN FROM CARITAS ARMENIA WITH WISDOM, LOVE AND COMPASSION Dear Faithful Sisters and Brothers: God called us, and we said YES.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan
    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan Capital: Yerevan Population: 3.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$8,140 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Civil Society 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Independent Media 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 National Democratic Governance 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Local Democratic Governance 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 5.25 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Corruption 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Democracy Score 5.18 5.14 5.21 5.21 5.39 5.39 5.43 5.39 5.36 5.36 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Vayots Dzor Marzma
    RA VAYOTS DZOR MARZMA RA VAYOTS DZOR MARZ Marz centre - Eghegnadzor town Territories -Vayk and Eghegnadzor Towns - Eghegnadzor, Jermuk and Vayk RA Vayots Dzor marz is situated in Southern part of the Republic. In the South borders with Nakhijevan, in the North it borders with RA Grgharkunik marz, in the East – RA Syunik marz and in the West – RA Ararat marz. Territory 2308 square km Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 7.8 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 41 Towns 3 Villages 52 Population number as of January 1, 2006 55.8 ths. persons including urban 19.4 ths. persons rural 36.4 ths. persons Share of urban population size 34.8% Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 1.7% Agricultural land 209262 ha including - arable land 16287 ha Vayots dzor is surrounded with high mountains, water-separately mountain ranges, that being original natural banks between its and neighbouring territories, turn that into a geographical single whole. Vayots dzor marz has varied fauna and flora. Natural forests comprise 6.7% or 13240.1 ha of territory. Voyots dzor surface is extraordinary variegated. Volcanic forces, earthquakes, waters of Arpa river and its tributaries raised numerous mountain ranges stretching by different directions with big and small tops, mysterious canyons, mountain passes, plateaus, concavities, fields, meadows and natural varied buildings, the most bright example of which is Jermuk wonderful waterfall (60 m). Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in Figures, 2002-2006 269 The Vayots dzor climate on the whole is continental with cold or moderate cold winters and hot or warm summers.
    [Show full text]
  • ARISC Newsletter No 6
    MEMBER NEWSLETTER ISSUE No. 6 2014-2015 A mer i c a n R e s e a r c h Ins t i t u t e o f t h e Sou t h C a u c a s u s Welcome! book and LinkedIn, reaching a much broader audience. Keep us in the loop Talin Lindsay, Executive Director about any developments on your re- search, from grants, to publications, to It is with great pleasure that I share breakthroughs, and beyond. with you ARISC’s 2014-15 accomplish- I invite you to read our “Notes From ments and programming in this newslet- ter! Since ARISC started as a nonprofit Abroad” section starting on page 5 to learn more about the most recent schol- organization in 2006, we have steadily grown in our activities, funding opportu- arship being conducted in the region by nities, and reach. This third year of our the next generation of scholars of the South Caucasus. We have made several four-year grant through the US Depart- ment of Education has seen our overseas awards to graduate students and junior scholars working in a variety of disci- IN THIS ISSUE: offices flourish, and our support of schol- plines. We have a steady stream of ar- ars’ research in the region continue to chaeologists reporting on recent finds, as make an impact for junior academics. Welcome Note 1 well as reports from the disciplines of art The 2014-15 year started with the history, anthropology, theology, history, ARISC Resident Directors 2 opening of the Georgia Branch in fall political science, geography, as well as 2014, and was celebrated with a joint ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • “National Capacity Self Assessment for Global Environmental Management”
    “NATIONAL CAPACITY SELF ASSESSMENT FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT” UNDP/GEF/ARM/02/G31/A/1G/99 YEREVAN 2004 The current report has been prepared under UNDP/GEF “National Capacity Self- Assessment for Global Environmental Management” project, executed by the Ministry of Nature Protection and implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) under financial assistance of Global Environment Facility (GEF). The project is aimed at assessment of capacity needs for fulfilment of commitments of Armenia under the United Nations Conventions on Biological Diversity, Climate Change and to Combat Desertification. The ultimate goal of the project is to develop a National Action Plan for capacity building in the cross-cutting areas which can ensure the synergistic effect. Project Coordinator - Diana Harutyunyan Project Assistant - Gayane Simonyan Editor – Mikhail Vermishev Consultants – Simon Papyan, First Deputy Minister of Nature Protection, Aram Gabrielyan UNFCCC Focal Point, Tatyana Danielyan UNCBD Focal Point, Ashot Vardevanyan UNCCD Focal Point The project expresses its special gratitude to Aram Ter-Zakaryan and Georgi Arzumanyan, project National Directors, and Anahit Simonyan, UNDP Environment and Energy Portfolio Manager, for support and professional advice in guiding NCSA process. Project also acknowledges substantive contribution of all organizations and individuals in preparation of the current study. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. Commitments Towards Convention Objectives and Implementation Issues in Armenia ...... 13 1.2. Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia an Open Air Museum
    TOURISM GUIDE ARMENIA AN OPEN AIR MUSEUM Gavar - 2018 A R M E N I A Armenia Brief Information Where is Armenia? Armenia is in South Caucasus. In north the country borders with Georgia, in south – with Iran, in east – with Azerbaijan, in west – with Turkey. The current territory of the Republic of Armenia is 29800 square km and is situated about 1800 m above sea level. The highest point is mount Aragats (4090 m), the lowest – canyon of the river Debet (400 m). Yerevan is the capital of the country. According to the 2003 census data population is 3, 2 million people, 1, 1 of which lives in Yerevan. When is the best time to visit Armenia? Armenia is equally wonderful in all the seasons of year. In comparatively small territory you can meet amazingly diverse nature and weather; spring, summer, autumn and winter are full and brightly expressed. Season of tours to Armenia starts in April and lasts until November, though nature gets the peak blossom in the end of May, but autumn is plentiful until the end of September. During the tourist season our guests can enjoy dishes, made of ecologically pure, natural and extremely tasty ingredients. July is the very full of tourist season. From December to the end of March doors of resort Tsakhkadzor are open to all the winter rest and winter sport fans. The best destination for the therapeutic recreation is hydropathical resort Jermuk, which you can visit any time of the year. How to get to Armenia? Armenia does not have outlet to sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Kotayk Province – Under2 Coalition-Appendix
    Kotayk Province – Under2 Coalition-Appendix PROFILE The Province situated at the central part of Armenia and covers an area of 2,089 km2 (807 sq mi) (7% of total area of Armenia). Kotayk is bordered by Lori Province from the north, Tavush Province from the northeast, Gegharkunik Province from the east, Aragatsotn Province from the west, and Ararat Province and the capital Yerevan from the south. Kotayk is the only province in Armenia that has no borders with foreign countries. Demographic and economic profile: Country: Republic of Armenia Province’s Population: 254,397, 8.4% of the entire population of Armenia Country GDP (PPP): Total: $ 26.560 billion (2016) Per Capita: $ 8,881 (2016) TARGETS The Republic of Armenia ratified the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in May 1993 and as a developing country not included in Annex I to the Convention. In December 2002, Armenia ratified the UNFCCC Kyoto Protocol. On September 2016, Armenia signed the Paris Agreement. According to Armenia’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC) submitted to the UNFCCC in 2015, the country (respectively the Kotayk Province) intends to limit aggregate GHG emissions to 633 million tCO2e for the period between 2015 and 2050. An annual average of GHG emission per capita aims to be limited to 5.4tCO2e for the period of 2015-2050, while Armenia’s GHG emissions comprised 2.14tCO2e per capita in 2010. TOOLS Armenia (respectively the Kotayk Province) outlines some of the priority sectors in mitigation and adaptation which are as follows. Energy supply Transport Land use and forestry Water resource management Energy supply The energy sector in Armenia has achieved a range of reforms over the past decades, which have led to a strong payment discipline with collections for electricity (100% of sales), reforms for the energy subsidies and a competent regulatory agency put in place for the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021-02
    Սուրբ Երրորդութիւն Հայաստանեայց Առաքելական Եկեղեցի Holy Trinity Armenian Apostolic Church LOOYS Cheltenham, PA Rev. Fr. Hakob Gevorgyan, Pastor Spring 2021-02 Church School Graduation Day Upcoming Events Hours of Worship - Morning Service: 10:00 AM Read what’s been happening at our - Divine Liturgy: 10:30 AM church and be a part of what’s Church School coming up! - Language Instruction: 10:15-11:15 - Christian Education: 11:20-12:15 Pray Until Something Happens www.holytrinity-pa.org Contact Information Holy Trinity Armenian Church 101 Ashmead Road, Cheltenham, PA 19012 www.holytrinity-pa.org Items for inclusion in the Sunday Messenger or requests for Requiem Services or Special Prayers should be sent to the church office by Wednesday for the upcoming Sunday. For all emergencies, please contact Rev. Fr. Hakob Gevorgyan at the church 215-663-1600 (cell 917-213-8658). CHURCH INFORMATION ACYOA Jrs. Office Telephone: 215-663-1600 Margarita Badalyan (Chair) Kitchen: 267-282-4594 Mariana Majian (Parent Advisor) 215-758-2664 Pastor: Rev. Fr. Hakob Gevorgyan [email protected] LADIES of HOLY TRINITY Church Secretary: Maggie Miller Elizabeth Barone (Coordinator) 610-449-2236 [email protected] Lorraine Damerjian (Treasurer) 215-572-8465 REGULAR SUNDAY HOURS OF WORSHIP INTERCOMMUNAL Morning Service: 10:00 AM Ara Shakarjian 215-886-1904 Divine Liturgy (Soorp Badarak): 10:30 AM Tanya Paretchan 215-947-4394 Emily Movsesian 734-277-2753 Church School: 10:15 AM PARISH COUNCIL MEMBERS COFFEE HOUR COORDINATOR Jeanette Der Hagopian 215-672-4188 John Hanamirian (Chair) 215-431-0589 Larry D. Der Hagopian (Vice Chair) 215-489-7116 ADULT CHRISTIAN EDUCATION Don Paretchan (Treasurer) 610-608-1866 Nancy Basmajian (Coordinator) 215-722-3369 Mike Santerian (Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPOR
    Annex to the Protocol Decision of the Sitting of the Government of the Republic of Armenia No 32 of 9 August 2012 THIRD REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH POINT 1 OF ARTICLE 15 OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Yerevan 2012 Content Introduction Part 1 Analysis of the situation Part 2 Practical steps taken at national level summarising results of the 2nd stage of monitoring of implementation of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 3 Measures taken and projects implemented after the second report submitted by the Republic of Armenia aimed at application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages Part 4 Steps taken – according to articles Part 5 Implementation of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Armenia Annexes Annex 1 Distribution of permanent population of the Republic of Armenia by cities and villages Annex 2 The list of mixed rural settlements or settlements populated predominantly by national minorities Annex 3 The list of settlements, where Yezidi or Kurdish language is taught at state general education schools Annex 4 The list of settlements, where Assyrian language is taught at state general education schools Annex 5 The list of state general education schools which have classes with Russian language instruction INTRODUCTION 1. According to point 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, the Republic of Armenia submits the third report on the course of measures aimed at application of the principles of the Charter and of provisions of the Charter, as well as on results of the second stage of observations of the Committee of Experts on application of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages in Armenia, on practical steps implemented at national level in the framework of the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-Fifth Session Seventy-Fifth Year Agenda Items 34, 71 and 135
    United Nations A/75/495–S/2020/981 General Assembly Distr.: General 16 October 2020 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-fifth session Seventy-fifth year Agenda items 34, 71 and 135 Prevention of armed conflict Right of peoples to self-determination The responsibility to protect and the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity Letter dated 5 October 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose herewith the ad hoc report of the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia on fact-finding activities in villages of the Gegharkunik region (marz) of Armenia (see annex). The report testifies to the indiscriminate and targeted artillery and air attacks by Azerbaijani armed forc es from 27 September to 1 October 2020 on the villages of Sotk, Shatvan and Kut, which have resulted in the killing of one civilian and damage to civilian infrastructure. I kindly request that the present letter and its annex be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 34, 71 and 135, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Mher Margaryan Ambassador Permanent Representative 20-13759 (E) 201020 *2013759* A/75/495 S/2020/981 Annex to the letter dated 5 October 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Ad hoc report on fact-finding activities in villages of Gegharkunik province of Armenia damaged by Azerbaijani military attacks, 30 September–1 October Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia Yerevan, 2020 On September 30, the Human Rights Defender visited Gegharkunik province of Armenia to conduct a fact-finding mission related to the Azerbaijani air and artillery attacks towards civilian settlements.
    [Show full text]