DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Accessibility Task Force (IATF) Was Formed to Further Develop and Implement Meaningful Accessibility Initiatives (CTA Board Resolution No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Accessibility Task Force (IATF) Was Formed to Further Develop and Implement Meaningful Accessibility Initiatives (CTA Board Resolution No CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY NACTO – Designing Cities October 2, 2018 CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY Created in 1947 Serves Chicago and 35 nearby suburbs 1.5 million rides every weekday Rail System 145 Rail stations 224 miles of Track Bus System 130 Bus Routes <11,000 Bus Stops Fleet <1,800 buses <1,400 rail cars 2 2 AGENDA I. Pre-2010 Approach to Accessibility II. Infrastructure Accessibility Taskforce (IATF) III. What happened after IATF IV. All Stations Accessibility Program (ASAP) V. Next Steps 3 3 CONVENTIONAL WISDOM PRE-2010 Accessibility 63% pre- 2010 90 of 143 stations accessible Had hit our “key stations” goal in 2009 How can we avoid triggering accessibility upgrades here (to save money)? Accessibility is something we do only in the context of major rehabilitation or reconstruction. Accessibility improvements are a luxury we can’t afford. 4 HOW WE CAME TOGETHER July 14, 2010 – Infrastructure Accessibility Task Force (IATF) was formed to further develop and implement meaningful accessibility initiatives (CTA Board Resolution No. R010-6) Working group met monthly September 2010 thru June 2011: External Accessibility Experts: MOPD, CDOT, UIC (Assistive Technology Unit), Chicago ADAPT, Chicago Lighthouse, CTA ADA Advisory Committee, LCM Architects (Universal Design) CTA Internal Staff: ADA Compliance, Infrastructure/Engineering. Planning, Rail Operations Developed: Evaluation Criteria and Methodology; Prioritized Stations List; Station Conceptual Designs & Costs 5 IATF STATION PRIORITIZATION Weight Needs Criteria (%) Ridership and Gaps Station Ridership 15% Persons with Disabilities 5% Ridership Senior Ridership 5% Station Gaps 15% Origins Population 10% Paratransit Address 20% Senior Housing 5% Destinations Employment 7% University 7% Senior Services 7% Points of Interest 4% 6 IATF TOP STATIONS (BY AREA) Loop Northwest (NW) Randolph/Wabash Damen/Milwaukee State/Lake Belmont – O’Hare Adams/Wabash Irving Park – O’Hare Loop – Outer South – Dan Ryan Clark/Division 63rd North/Clybourn Garfield Division/Milwaukee 87th North West Wilson Austin- Lake Lawrence Pulaski – Forest Park Argyle Racine – Forest Park 7 IATF 10% DESIGNS Loop Northwest (NW) Washington/Wabash Damen/Milwaukee State/Lake Belmont – O’Hare Adams/Wabash Irving Park – O’Hare Addison – O’Hare Loop – Outer South – Dan Ryan CTA Quincy Station Rendering Clark/Division 63rd North/Clybourn Garfield Division/Milwaukee 87th North West Wilson Austin- Lake Lawrence Pulaski – Forest Park Argyle Racine – Forest Park Washington/Wabash Station 8 KEY IATF TAKEAWAYS Path of Travel To and Within Station Accessible entrances for main and auxiliary entrances Weather Protection Find ways to reduce elevator outage time Not just vertical access: consider all types of disabilities Phased approach: when funding is constrained, address as many accessibility features as possible Include accessibility at the beginning of project planning Keep it going: Continue to update station prioritization Continue to develop initiatives to reinforce CTA’s commitment to full accessibility 9 STATIONS COMPLETED Loop Northwest (NW) Washington/Wabash Damen/Milwaukee State/Lake Belmont – O’Hare Adams/Wabash Irving Park – O’Hare Quincy Addison – O’Hare Loop – Outer South – Dan Ryan Clark/Division 63rd North/Clybourn Garfield Division/Milwaukee 87th North West Wilson Austin- Lake Lawrence Pulaski – Forest Park Argyle Racine – Forest Park Addison Station Elevator Construction 10 ALL STATIONS ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAM “During Wednesday evening’s ADA 25 Chicago celebration, CTA President Dorval Carter introduced plans for the creation of the new CTA Strategic Accessibility Program – a first-ever, comprehensive plan that will outline both short-term and long-term initiatives to make the CTA’s rail system fully ADA accessible over the next 20 years and plans to either repair and/or replace existing rail system elevators.” – January 7, 2016 Focused on vertical accessibility 42 remaining stations inaccessible (after Quincy) Developed a phased plan Added a wayfinding component Incorporated elevator rehabilitation 11 Why will it take 20 years to make CTA’s rail system fully accessible? Age and Condition - average age of 75 years Station configuration types (subway, elevated, median, at- grade) Platform Widths and Lengths Stationhouse Space Constraints Property Impacts Utility Relocation Adjacent Freight Rail Historic Resources Irving Park (Blue) Station 12 ASAP OVERVIEW ASAP Goal: To create a 100% vertically accessible rail system within 20 years 43 of 145 stations are currently inaccessible (Quincy currently in construction) 42 stations will be made accessible as part of the 20 year program Rehabilitate/replace 162 existing elevators at CTA rail stations 13 STATION PRIORITIZATION Weight Complexity Needs Criteria Complexity Variables (%) Penalty Ridership and Gaps Subway Station Ridership 20% Subway station configuration -3 Persons with Disabilities Number of adjacent buildings/properties impacted -1 10% Ridership Presence of a six-corner intersection -1 Senior Ridership 5% Other station configuration challenges -1 or -2 Station Gaps 15% Elevated / Median / At-Grade Connections 5% Station condition (repairs required) -1 Origins Station condition (reconstruction needed) -2 Population 10% Number of adjacent buildings/properties impacted -1 Paratransit 20% Need for land acquisition -1 Destinations Other station configuration challenges (e.g., site -1 or -2 constraints, adjacent to other infrastructure) Employment 7% University 4% Stations with higher complexity scores (5) are less complex and Points of Interest 4% those with lower scores (zero) are more complex. For both the need and complexity assessments, all stations Stations with higher need score (5) were assigned a score between zero and five, with zero reflect a greater need for accessibility. representing the lowest score and five the highest. 14 ASAP PHASE ONE • Includes installing new elevators at 8 CTA rail stations and rehabilitating/replacing 40 existing elevators. • CTA needs to obtain $140.3 Million to fully fund ASAP Phase One. 15 ASAP Phase One – Austin (Green) Proposed conceptual rendering 16 ASAP Phase One – Montrose (Blue) Proposed conceptual rendering 17 ASAP Phase One – California (Blue) Proposed conceptual rendering 18 ASAP Phase One – First Two Years of Elevator Replacement Program 2-Year Elevator Replacement Program Elevator Replacement Program Schedule Criteria Number of Station Station Ridership Line Station Elevators Elevator Age (years) Total Elevator Downtime (hours) Clark/Lake All 4 elevators Loop Washington/Wells 1 of 2 elevators Jackson All 4 elevators Red Loyola Only elevator Forest Park Only elevator Blue Western (O’Hare) 1 of 2 elevators O’Hare Only elevator Orange Midway Both elevators Purple Davis 1 of 2 elevators Jackson Station Elevator 19 20-YEAR ASAP PROGRAM COSTS • The full 20-Year ASAP Program (ASAP Phase One and Future ASAP Phases) includes installing new elevators at 42 CTA rail stations and rehabilitating/replacing 162 existing elevators. • This will achieve 100% vertical accessibility for the CTA rail system. • The 20-year ASAP Program will require $2.1 Billion in total funding. 20 20-YEAR ASAP PHASING PLAN 21 WAYFINDING RECOMMENDATIONS Six wayfinding options identified in the report: • Select pilot station locations for tactile ground surface indicators and additional floor graphics. The CTA will need to analyze both how this works functionally and the materials that could be used. • Coordinate with CDOT on pedestrian routes outside rail stations that connect with bus stops and potential installation of APS. • Explore tactile signage at bus stops to assist with exact location. CTA is currently preparing rail station guides to assist with navigation inside rail stations, which will be available online soon and will serve a similar purpose as tactile maps. • Further enhance directional signage and lighting in stations. • Seek feedback on wayfinding APPs from users in other systems on adaptability and usability of these APPs. The CTA will remain engaged on the topic with the goal of potentially adopting something similar when the technology is more advanced. 22 NEXT STEPS: ADVOCATING FOR ASAP FUNDING • Long-term federal and state funding solutions are needed. • Implementation of ASAP Phase One and Future ASAP Phases will heavily rely on a stable and reliable source of state capital funding as well as a new federal funding program. • A new federal funding program is needed to incentivize accessibility improvements beyond the ADA requirements. • CTA has complied with the core requirements of the ADA and is ready to go beyond requirements to a create a fully inclusive and accessible system. • A new state capital bill is needed to support the $140.3 Million projected cost of ASAP Phase One. • Existing funding sources are not adequate to support ASAP Phase One. 23 ASAP STRATEGIC PLAN RELEASE • The ASAP Strategic Plan was publicly released on July 19th, which coincided with several disability-focused events in Chicago. 24 Appendix ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT PRIORITIZATION To rehabilitate or replace all 155 existing passenger elevators on the CTA rail system and bring to a state of good repair over 20-year period, an average of 8 elevators per year would need to be completed. Elevator Replacement Program Score Ranges Criteria Station Ridership 1 – 5 Needs-Based Elevator Age (years) 1 – 5 Criteria Total Elevator Downtime (hours) 0 – 5 Prefer that two adjacent accessible stations not be under construction in the same year Prefer that no more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilson Transfer Station Consulting Parties Meeting
    WILSON TRANSFER STATION CONSULTING PARTIES MEETING Chicago Transit Authority AGENDA I. Welcome II. What is Section 106? III. Consulting Parties Introduction IV. Community Outreach V. Project Purpose and Need VI. Project Design VII.Amended Area of Potential Effect (APE) VIII.Memorandum of Agreement IX. Consulting Parties Input X. Next Steps 2 II. WHAT IS SECTION 106? In the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Congress established a comprehensive program to preserve the historical and cultural foundation of the Nation. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to consider the effects of projects they carry out, approve, or fund on historic properties. Section 106 review ensures that preservation values are factored into federal agency planning and decisions. Section 106 review requires federal agencies to gather information to decide which properties in the area that may be affected by the project are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places; determine how the historic properties might be affected; explore measures to avoid or reduce harm to historic properties and reach an agreement with the State Historic Preservation Officer on such measures to resolve any adverse effects. 3 II. WHAT IS SECTION 106? (CONTINUED) Wilson Transfer Station Project Section 106 Timeline • January 9, 2012 FTA sends Section 106 project initiation letter to Illinois Historic Preservation Agency (IHPA) • September 4, 2012 FTA sends the Historic Architectural Survey (containing
    [Show full text]
  • Chiflu – Corflu 33
    Progress Report 1 DECEMBER 2015 Chif lu – Corflu 33 Chicago 2016 – May 13-15 Progress Report 2 April 2016 (RIP Art. A trufan and a true friend to us all.) Home Stretch Well here we are one month out from Corflu 2016. This is the "now it gets real" moment for any convention. The list of to-dos gets longer every day, especially as things previously neglected suddenly rear their head ("Can I park your car for $60 a day sir?" and "I'm sorry do your attendees expect chairs in the conference room?"). The last one being a real question asked many years ago as we setup a con venue. It has been a while since I last organized a con, and those are two perfect reasons why that has remained true! But, the end is nigh, and we will have a "great time" - to paraphrase a wannabe contemporary politician, we will also have "the best time." Thank you President, er.. I mean King Trump for those inspiring words to live and plan cons by. This progress report sets the tone for what to expect at "the Chiflu". Conveniently hosted in downtown Chicago, there's a wealth of things to distract you from the actual con, and I implore you to take full advantage of the opportunity to enjoy our fine city. Except of course when there's programming happening. It is hard to walk around Chicago and not be inspired by the amazing architecture, public art, friendly locals, and sheer exuberance of it all. Also, spring has gotten off to a "great" start, and we are fully expecting "great" things in mid-May.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Tour October 20, 2002
    4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour October 20, 2002 Presented By: Chicago-L.org 4th Annual Historic “L” Station Tour Guide Union Loop When the tour begins at Quincy station downtown, you will find yourself on the old Union Elevated Railroad, commonly known as "the Loop." The only man who could accomplish the difficult task of bringing a common downtown terminal to the Chicago elevated rapid transit system, which used to end at a separate terminal for each company, was Charles Tyson Yerkes. He had enough political deftness and power to convince store owners to sign consent forms allowing construction of the overhead structures on their streets (although alley routes were briefly contemplated). Though it was difficult — two segments had to be obtained under the names of existing "L" companies while for the two other legs, two companies, the Union Elevated Railroad and the Union Consolidated Elevated Railroad, had to be created — Yerkes managed to coordinate it all. As can be imagined from its piecemeal The construction of the Loop through downtown, seen here look- method of obtaining of leases, the Union Loop (referred ing west at Lake and Wabash circa 1894, was a major construction to simply as "the Loop" today) opened in pieces, starting project. In spite of the disruption, the project brought innumerous benefits to the central business district. (Photo from the Krambles- in 1895, with the Lake Street "L" making the first full Peterson Archive) circuit in 1897. North Side Main Line/Ravenswood Line After leaving the Loop through Tower 18 (at Lake & Wells), once the busiest railroad junction in the world, you will be on what is today the Brown (Ravenswood) Line.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Project Management Oversight Report
    REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2019 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, “Invest in Transit,” highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. After nearly a decade without a State of Illinois capital program, transit in the RTA region will get a much‐needed infusion from the Rebuild Illinois bill passed on June 1, 2019 by the General Assembly. The RTA is looking forward to the implementation of this new state capital plan however there is a concern that the proposed funding for transit does not meet the current needs as identified in “Invest in Transit.” The 55 projects detailed in this report together represent $5,712,260,030 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed toward compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. All of the state funded projects are within budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheridan Park Sheridan Park
    invest in uptown's sheridan park Sheridan Park The Loop Packed with Local Flavor Sheridan Park is a district within the Uptown neighborhood, centered along Wilson Avenue and known for its historic homes and many small businesses. The area is adjacent to Truman College and its 23,000 faculty and students and is near large-scale events such as Chicago’s Pride Parade and the Windy City RibFest that attracts over 20,000 annually, plus the concerts and shows in Uptown’s many venues. Tap Into $600 Million of Public & Private Investment Sheridan Park is conveniently located to the tremendous public investment that is rebuilding Uptown’s transit and streets. The Wilson El station is undergoing a $205 million reconstruction, a $6 million Lawrence-Broadway streetscaping will add a plaza and stage to Broadway in 2017, plus the Red Line viaducts will soon be rebuilt. Additionally, 2,300 new residential units are proposed or under construction in the Uptown area, along with 150,000+ new square feet of retail space that includes Treasure Island Foods, Ross, and others. These public and private investments ensure continued vibrancy and Average household income: growth in the neighborhood for years to come. $71,905 Annual food spending: Sheridan Park $28.3 Million at a Glance: Millenials: Total annual spending: 49% 151 Million Median age: Total spending within 20-minute drive: 34.8 $22.3 Billion 2016 population: College educated: Uptown employees’ weekly spending: 7,379 61.7% $195,000+ Daytime population: Transit commuters: Uptown annual spending: 6,372 43% $1.2 Billion Uptown United provides technical assistance to property and business owners, developers, entrepreneurs, and non-profits with financing, city licensing and permitting, and site selection.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2018 Project Management Oversight Report
    June 2018 Project Management Oversight Prepared by the Department of Finance, Innovation & Technology REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2018 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The State of Good Repair backlog for the region currently stands at $19.4 billion, and the 10‐ year capital need for normal reinvestment is $18.3 billion, which results in total 10‐year capital need of $37.7 billion. The 60 projects detailed in this report together represent $3,861,547,183 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects will address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed to compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. The majority of state funded projects are within budget, one project is under budget. 80% of the state funded projects are on schedule. Regarding change orders, some of the added budget came from decisions by the Service Boards to add value to projects or comply with federal requirements. Other change orders were mostly for unforeseen conditions, and a minimal amount was due to errors and omissions. There were also change orders that provided credit for value engineering and for unused allowance and deleted work. Although the progress being made on these projects is significant, current capital funding will not support much needed renewal of the region’s aging transit infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Hastalis Committee Members
    1 ADA Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, April 14, 2014 Members Present Chairperson: Steve Hastalis Committee Members: Garland Armstrong Rhychell Barnes Dorrell Perry Doreen Bogus Mary Anne Cappelleri Bryen Yunashko Grace Kaminkowitz Excused: Maurice Fantus Tim Fischer Laura Miller Facilitator: Amy Serpe, CTA Manager, ADA Compliance Programs Steve Hastalis, Committee Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Roll Call • Members of the Committee introduced themselves. • Maurice Fantus, Tim Fischer, and Laura Miller had excused absences from the meeting. Announcement • There was an announcement that Yochai Eisenberg has resigned from the Committee. Approval of Minutes from January 13, 2014 Meeting • There were a couple of changes to the January 14, 2014 minutes. Rosemary Gerty pointed out the correct spelling of Anne LeFevre’s name. Ms. Gerty clarified that the RTA Appeals Board for Paratransit certification does not reevaluate, but rather discusses the terms of appeals in order to gain additional information. Ms. Gerty also updated the number of appeals in 2013 to 112. Ms. Kaminkowitz withdrew her motion and moved to accept the minutes as corrected. Mr. Armstrong seconded the motion. Mr. Hastalis asked for a vote to approve the minutes as amended. The Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the Committee’s January 14, 2014 meeting. Rail Car Information • Mr. Robert Kielba, Chief Rail Equipment Engineer, stated that there are about 432, 5,000 Series rail cars in service. There are 14 cars running with the new door opening chime activated primarily on the Red, Yellow, and Purple Lines. • There are 58 cars loaded with the software at a rate of four to six cars completed in a week.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-By-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021
    Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-by-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021 The CTA held station-by-station meetings to provide the public with an update of upcoming construction activities for the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project, which is a part of the Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Phase One project. Below is a summary of the questions and answers discussed in each of the meetings. Bryn Mawr station Q. How long will Bryn Mawr station be under construction and will it be closed at any point? A. The Bryn Mawr station will close on May 16, 2021, but you will still be able to access the Red Line from the new Bryn Mawr temporary station entrances. During Stage A construction (2021-late 2022), there will be a separate entrance for Howard, or northbound, service located on Bryn Mawr. 95th-bound, or southbound, service will use the entrance on Broadway. During Stage B (late 2022- 2024), there will be southbound-only access via a temporary entrance on Bryn Mawr. The new station will open by the end of 2024. Q. When will the temporary station open and will the temporary stations be ADA accessible? The temporary station will open May 16, 2021. It will not be ADA accessible but the new permanent station, opening in 2024, will have both elevator and escalator access. Q. Given the tracks are expanding and getting wider, are there plans for some type of sound barrier? A. Yes, the new track structure will have noise barriers. Q. Is construction working from north to south? A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Budget Recommendations
    MODERNIZING TRANSIT FOR THE FUTURE PRESIDENT’S 2014 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) CTA FY14 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CTA Organizational Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2013 Operating Budget Performance 2012 Operating Budget Performance Summary ........................................................................................ 25 2012 Operating Budget Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 34 President’s 2014 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ....................................................................... 35 President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Schedule ......................................................................... 42 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Summary ............................................. 43 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Schedule .............................................. 47 2014-2018 Capital
    [Show full text]
  • CTA Wilson Train Station C E I in N Niz Chicago, Illinois OtI Galva
    lvanizers Ga Ass an oc ic ia r t e io m n A E s x c d e r a ll e w n 2018 A CTA Wilson Train Station c g e i in n H niz Chicago, Illinois ot-Dip Galva he Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) has managed The new $203 million station will have disability Tbus and rail mass transit for the city of Chicago accommodations, artwork, and retail shops. Not Galvanizers since 1947, serving 1.7 million riders per day. In only did the new station help CTA riders, but thanks AZZ Galvanizing - Canton 1900, the Wilson Station, then known as the Uptown to the strength-to-weight ratio, using galvanized AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton Station, opened as a transfer station where two rail steel rather than the previous concrete columns also AZZ Galvanizing - Joliet lines come together. meant the very busy Wilson and Broadway Avenues below now have more lanes for local traffic. Contractor The CTA has a great history of using hot-dip Walsh Group galvanizing on many projects. The Wilson Station On the north side of Chicago, the new CTA Wilson project required strict adherence to a budget, Station now provides a handsome transfer station Fabricators the best available corrosion protection, and little where Red Line and Purple Line commuters Industrial Steel Construction, Inc. maintenance. Hot-dip galvanizing provided the can safely ride to and from their busy business K&K Iron Works LLC answer to all of these requirements. The initial cost, and personal lives. The station will have little Munster Steel Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Historical Calendar Cta 2021 January
    cta 2021 Historical Calendar cta 2021 January Built in 1936 by the St. Louis Car Company, Chicago Surface Lines trolley bus #184 heads eastbound via Diversey to Western. Trolley bus service was first introduced in Chicago on the #76 Diversey route in 1930. Other trolley bus routes were soon added, some as extensions of existing streetcar lines and later as conversions of streetcar lines to trolley bus service. Trolley bus extensions to existing streetcar lines were an economical way to serve new neighborhoods that were established in outlying parts of the city. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ABCDEFG: December 2020 February 2021 B C CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group Days Off 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t Alternate day off if 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 you work on this day 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Central offices closed 27 28 29 30 31 28 1 New Year’s Day 2 C D E F G A B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B C D E F G A 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G Martin Luther King, 17 18 Jr. Day 19 20 21 22 23 G A B C D E F 24 F 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 cta 2021 February Car #1643 was an example of Chicago’s first electric streetcars.
    [Show full text]
  • 125 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2090, Chicago IL 60606
    125 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2090, Chicago IL 60606 The furnished sub-lease space is located on the 20th floor at the corner of Wacker Drive and Adams Street. The space consists of three private offices/conference room, an open office area, and a private kitchen (see floor plan). The building is within 0.2 miles of Union Station, Ogilvie Transportation Center, and CTA (Brown, Purple, Orange, Pink Lines). Space comes complete with furniture and network cabling. • Available October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019 • INCLUDES furniture and network cabling • 1,781 square feet • 14’ x 14’ corner office • 14’ x 14’ conference room • 10’ x 9’ office • Large 28’ x 22’ open office area which holds 7 desks • Kitchen with sink and refrigerator • Rent $15 per square foot per year Amenities • Banking • Conferencing Facility • Fitness Center • On Site Management • Property Manager on Site • Restaurant Public Transportation Commuter Rail Drive Walk Distance Chicago Union Station Commuter Rail (North Central Service, Milwaukee District North Line, Milwaukee District West Line, Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railway 3 min 3 min 0.2 mi Line, Heritage Corridor Line, SouthWest Service) Chicago Ogilvie Transportation Center Commuter Rail (Union Pacific North, Union 3 min 5 min 0.2 mi Pacific Northwest, Union Pacific West Lines) Transit/Subway Drive Walk Distance Quincy Station (Downtown Loop) (Brown, Orange, Pink, Purple Lines) 3 min 3 min 0.2 mi Washington/Wells Station (Downtown Loop) (Brown, Orange, Pink, Purple Lines) 4 min 0.2 mi Clinton Station (Blue Line)
    [Show full text]