DEVELOPMENTS of TREASON and the ROLE of the JURY Legal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DEVELOPMENTS of TREASON and the ROLE of the JURY Legal UNITED STATES V. HODGES: DEVELOPMENTS OF TREASON AND THE ROLE OF THE JURY JENNIFER ELISA CHAPMAN† ABSTRACT Legal history is an important element in understanding current legal and political debates. What can a long-forgotten treason trial from the War of 1812 teach us about present-day discussions of treason and the devel- opment of the jury trial in America? In August 1814, the toWn of Upper Marlboro, in Prince Georges County, Maryland, arrested a number of Brit- ish soldiers as stragglers or deserters. Upon learning of the soldiers’ ab- sence, the British military took into custody the local physician, Dr. Wil- liam Beanes, and tWo other Upper Marlboro residents, and threatened to burn Upper Marlboro if the toWn did not return the soldiers to the British military. John Hodges, a local attorney, arranged for the soldiers’ return to the British military and was charged with high treason for “adhering to [the] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” The resulting jury trial— presided over by Justice Gabriel Duvall, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice and Prince Georges County native—highlights: (1) how the crime of treason was viewed in early American culture, and (2) the role of the jury as de- ciders of the facts and law in early American jurisprudence. Hodges’s trial proceeded against the backdrop of the War of 1812 and Was informed by the 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 118 I. CONTEXTUALIZING UNITED STATES V. HODGES —TREASON, JURIES, AND THE WAR OF 1812 ......................................................... 119 A. Treason in Early America ........................................................... 119 1. Early Treason Trials and the Trial of Aaron Burr .................. 122 B. Jury Trials in Early America ....................................................... 124 C. The War of 1812 .......................................................................... 126 II. THE CRIME ........................................................................................ 129 A. Before the Crime ......................................................................... 129 B. The Crime .................................................................................... 131 III. THE TRIAL ....................................................................................... 132 A. The Trial Report of John Hodges ................................................ 132 B. The Trial: Actors, Actions, and an Instantaneous Verdict .......... 133 † Jennifer Elisa Chapman, Ryan H. Easley Research FelloW, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Thurgood Marshall Law Library. The Author wishes to thank Garett PoWer, Frederick Leiner, and Dr. EdWard Papenfuse for their insightful comments. 117 118 DENVER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 97:1 1. Witnesses and Witness Testimony ......................................... 134 2. Deserters, Stragglers, and/or Prisoners ................................... 136 3. The Prosecution and the Defense: What is Treason? ............. 137 4. Justice Duvall’s Opinion and the Jury .................................... 139 C. Analysis.......................................................................................140 1. Why Did the Jury Find John Hodges Not Guilty? ................. 140 2. Why Was John Hodges Tried for Treason? ............................ 142 IV. IMPACTS OF THE CASE .................................................................... 144 A. Changing Concepts of Treason in America ................................ 144 B. Changing Concepts of the Role of the Jury in American Jurisprudence ............................................................. 146 1. Sparf and Hansen v. United States ......................................... 147 2. Maryland: The Unger Cases ................................................... 148 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 150 INTRODUCTION Legal history is important to understanding present-day legal and po- litical issues. What, then, can a long-forgotten treason trial from the War of 1812 teach us about present-day debates around the doctrine of treason and the development of the jury trial in America? This Article starts by examining the context of John Hodges’s treason trial and begins the com- plex examination of how history impacts current views of treason and jury trials in America. In August 1814, as British forces left a burned and ravaged Washing- ton, D.C., the Maryland toWn of Upper Marlboro, in Prince Georges County, arrested a number of British soldiers as stragglers or deserters.1 Upon learning of the soldiers’ absence, the British military took into cus- tody Dr. William Beanes, and tWo additional Upper Marlboro residents, and threatened to burn Upper Marlboro if the toWn did not return the Brit- ish soldiers.2 John Hodges, a local attorney, arranged for the soldiers’ re- turn to the British military3 and Was later charged With high treason for “adhering to [the] [e]nemies, giving them [a]id and [c]omfort.”4 The re- sulting jury trial—presided over by Justice Gabriel Duvall, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice and Prince Georges County native—highlights how the crime of treason Was viewed in early American culture and the role of the jury as deciders of the facts and the laW in early American jurisprudence.5 1. 1 JOHN HODGES REPORT OF THE TRIAL OF JOHN HODGES ESQ. A CHARGE OF HIGH TREASON, TRIED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MARYLAND DISTRICT AT THE MAY TERM, 1815, 5 (1815) (hereinafter HODGES). Upper Marlboro is located in Prince Georges County, Maryland, approximately tWenty miles from Washington, D.C. 2. HODGES, supra note 1; John Hodges (of Thomas) (b. 1763 – d. 1825), ARCHIVES OF MARYLAND (BIOGRAPHICAL SERIES), http://msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/spec- col/sc5400/sc5496/002800/002849/html/002849bio.html (last visited Oct. 8, 2019) [hereinafter John Hodges (of Thomas)]. 3. HODGES, supra note 1, at 9–10; John Hodges (of Thomas), supra note 2. 4. U.S. CONST. art. III, § 3; HODGES, supra note 1; John Hodges (of Thomas), supra note 2. 5. HODGES, supra note 1, at 27; Duvall, Gabriel, FED. JUD. CTR., https://WWW.fjc.gov/his- tory/judges/duvall-gabriel (last visited Oct. 8, 2019). 2019] DEVELOPMENTS OF TREASON 119 Hodges’s trial took place during a tumultuous time, against the backdrop of the War of 1812, While the 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr was still fresh in American minds.6 This Article: (1) examines the historical context of Hodges’s treason trial; (2) describes and analyzes the facts of the alleged crime and resulting jury trial; (3) analyzes the historical developments in America of treason as a crime; and (4) assesses the changing conceptions of the jury’s role as deciders of the facts and the laW. Specifically, Part I examines the histori- cal context of Hodges’s trial by analyzing treason and jury trials in early America and the impact of the War of 1812.7 Part II recounts the facts of the alleged crime including: the persons involved and events leading up to the crime.8 Part III describes and analyzes the trial including: the persons involved; witness statements; attorney arguments; and Justice Duvall’s statement to the jury.9 Part IV examines: the impacts of the case; the changing conceptions of the crime of treason during times of strife in American history; and the evolving role of the jury in American jurispru- dence.10 I. CONTEXTUALIZING UNITED STATES V. HODGES —TREASON, JURIES, AND THE WAR OF 1812 This Article examines the 1815 treason trial of John Hodges Within the context of the development of the crime of treason, the role of the jury in American jurisprudence, and the effects of the War of 1812. A. Treason in Early America A number of sources11 influenced the development of the American treason doctrine.12 These sources included: English laws; the effects of the tumultuous revolutionary period; and the nation’s founders balancing a desire to safeguard America While ensuring charges of treason Would not be “used as an instrument of political prosecution.”13 Early treason trials— specifically, the 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr—informed how the na- tion perceived treason at the time of John Hodges’s trial in 1815.14 6. See, e.g, MARK R. KILLENBECK, M’CULLOCH V. MARYLAND: SECURING A NATION 192 (2006); The War of 1812, SMITHSONIAN NAT’L MUSEUM OF AM. HIST., http://amhis- tory.si.edu/starspangledbanner/the-war-of-1812.aspx (last visited Oct. 8, 2019). 7. See infra Part I. 8. See infra Part II. 9. See infra Part III. 10. See infra Part IV. 11. See Willard Hurst, Treason in the United States, 58 HARV. L. REV. 395, 395–417 (1945). 12. See generally Treason Act of 1351, 25 EdW. 3 St. 5 c. 2 (1350) (defining treason in English laW); Charles Warren, What is Giving Aid and Comfort to the Enemy?, 27 YALE L.J. 331 (1918) (fo- cusing on the development of the elements of treason). 13. See PETER CHARLES HOFFER, THE TREASON TRIALS OF AARON BURR 58, 63–70 (Peter Charles Hoffer & N.E.H. Hull eds., 2008); JEAN EDWARD SMITH, JOHN MARSHALL: DEFINER OF A NATION 370 (Henry Holt & Co. ed., 1998). 14. See United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 55, 186 (C.C.D. Va. 1807). 120 DENVER LAW REVIEW [Vol. 97:1 English treason law influenced America’s founding fathers as they crafted the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, America’s founders Wished to develop a treason doctrine that—unlike English treason doctrine—could not be used to suppress political adversaries. The
Recommended publications
  • United States V. Hodges: Treason, Jury Trials, and the War of 1812
    FOREWORD: Title United States v. Hodges: Treason, Jury Trials, and the War of 1812 Author Jennifer Elisa Smith Document Type Article Publication Date 2016 Keywords Legal history, treason, jury, Justice Gabriel Duvall, War of 1812 Abstract In August 1814 a number of British soldiers were arrested as stragglers or deserters in the town of Upper Marlboro, Maryland. Upon learning of the soldiers’ absences the British military took local physician, Dr. William Beanes, and two other residents into custody and threatened to burn Upper Marlboro if the British soldiers were not returned. John Hodges, a local attorney, arranged the soldiers’ return to the British military. For this, Hodges was charged with high treason for “adhering to [the] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” The resulting jury trial was presided over by Justice Gabriel Duvall, a Supreme Court Justice and Prince Georges County native, and highlights how the crime of treason was viewed in early American culture and the role of the jury as deciders of the facts and the law in early American jurisprudence. Contextually, Hodges’ trial took place against the backdrop of the War of 1812 and was informed by the 1807 treason trial of Aaron Burr. Disciplines Law, constitutional history, legal history 1 UNITED STATES V. HODGES:1 TREASON, JURY TRIALS, AND THE WAR OF 1812 Jennifer Elisa Smith INTRODUCTION In August 1814 as British forces left a burned and ravaged Washington, D.C. a number of British soldiers were arrested as stragglers or deserters in the town of Upper Marlboro in Prince Georges County Maryland.2 Upon learning of the soldiers’ absences the British military took local physician, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the War of 1812 and the Star-Spangled Banner
    t t c c A History of the War of 1812 and The Star-Spangled e e j j Banner o o r r Objectives: Students will be able to cite the origins and outcome of the War of 1812 P P and be able to place the creation of the Star-Spangled Banner in a chronological framework. r r e e Time: 3 to 5 class periods, depending on extension activities n n Skills: Reading, chronological thinking, map-making. n Content Areas: Language Arts- Vocabulary, Language Arts- Reading, Social Studies- n a a Geography, Social Studies- United States history Materials: B B ♦ Poster board or oak tag d d ♦ Colored markers e e l l ♦ Pencils g g ♦ Copies of reading material n n a a Standards: p p NCHS History Standards S S K-4 Historical Thinking Standards - - 1A: Identify the temporal structure of a historical narrative or story. r r 1F: Create timelines. a a t t 5A: Identify problems and dilemmas confronting people in historical S S stories, myths, legends, and fables, and in the history of their school, community, state, nation, and the world. e e 5B: Analyze the interests, values, and points of view of those h h involved in the dilemma or problem situation. T T K-4 Historical Content Standards 4D: The student understands events that celebrate and exemplify fundamental values and principles of American democracy. 4E: The student understands national symbols through which American values and principles are expressed. 5-12 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of a historical narrative or story.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf
    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Resource Handbook
    GRADE 4 THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE HANDBOOK Program of The American Flag Foundation, Inc. P. O. Box 435 Riderwood, Maryland 21139 443-243-3437 www.americanflagfoundation.org How does the American Flag inspire patriotism and citizenship among people in America? TO THE EDUCATOR: The purpose of the Educational Resource Handbooks is to develop and enhance the students’ knowledge and understanding of leadership, citizenship and character. Through the study of people, their values, and the events that led to the development of the United States Flag and its symbols, students will develop an understanding of their American heritage and of the need to continue strong leadership, citizenship and character. FEATURES OF THE HANDBOOKS 1. Aligned to the Common Core Standards in the area of… a. Reading – Literature b. Reading – Informational Text c. Foundational Skills d. Writing e. Speaking and Listening f. Language 2. Interdisciplinary approach 3. Adaptable across grade levels 4. Adaptable to all levels of learning 5. Teacher friendly 6. Format includes: Lesson Objectives a. Motivation b. Discussion c. Activities d. Culminating Activities 7. Resource Guide & Resource Pages 8. Blackline masters 9. Lesson rubrics The material in these handbooks is appropriate for activities during National Flag Week (PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – June 14) and also other historical events observed throughout the school year. The range of activities included in the lesson format can be tailored to meet the needs of the students. These suggested activities cover a broad spectrum of educational disciplines. If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to contact The American Flag Foundation at 443-243-3437.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form
    Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No. PG: 79-019-22 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form 1. Name of Property (indicate preferred name) historic Doctor William and Sarah Beanes Cemetery other 2. Location street and number 14554 Elm Street not for publication city, town Upper Marlboro vicinity county Prince George's 3. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of all owners) name Prince George's County street and number 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive telephone city, town Upper Marlboro state MD zip code 20772 4. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Prince George's County Courthouse liber 4411 folio 183 city, town Upper Marlboro tax map 101 tax parcel 25 tax ID number 03-0192302 5. Primary Location of Additional Data Contributing Resource in National Register District Contributing Resource in Local Historic District Determined Eligible for the National Register/Maryland Register Determined Ineligible for the National Register/Maryland Register Recorded by HABS/HAER Historic Structure Report or Research Report at MHT X Other: Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Prince George's County Planning Department 6. Classification Category Ownership Current Function Resource Count district X public agriculture landscape Contributing Noncontributing building(s) private commerce/trade recreation/culture buildings structure both defense religion 1 sites X site domestic social structures object education transportation objects X funerary work in progress 1 0 Total government unknown health care vacant/not in use Number of Contributing Resources industry other: previously listed in the Inventory 1 7. Description Inventory No. PG: 79-019-22 Condition excellent deteriorated X good ruins fair altered Prepare both a one paragraph summary and a comprehensive description of the resource and its various elements as it exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Milestones Milestonesones War of 1812 & the Battle of Bladensburg
    42503 AT_WalkingTour7/8/13.qxp 10/11/13 11:53 AM Page 1 MARARRYYLANDYLAND MARYLAND MILESTONES MILESTOONESNES WAR OF 1812 & THE BATTLE OF BLADENSBURG On June 18, 1812, the United States declared war on Great Britain. The War of 1812–also known as the “second war for American independence”–threatened every border of our young Nation. In August of 1814, the War was brought to the Chesapeake Bay and at Noon on August 24, the War came here to Prince George’s County. Bladensburg, a colonial tobacco trading port, was where British military leaders crossed on their way to burn the Capitol. While the bridge no longer exists, the modern ped1estrian bridge at Waterfront Park approximates the size, while the location is just to the south of the modern President James Madison Commodore Joshua Barney highway bridge. State James Monroe, General Walter Smith and his aide Francis Scott Key, all on the field at the opening British troops, having marched across the County of the battle, second-guessed other leaders and from Nottingham and through Upper Marlbrough, retreated as well – eventually leading to the term entered Bladensburg near Benjamin Stoddert’s “Bladensburg Races.” Cannons which were Bostwick along the “river road.” Bostwick, at the intended to provide su3pport to the troops arrived late time, was home to the British Prisoner Exchange as they were moved into place along Bladensburg Commissioner and was used as a temporary camp for Road near 40th Avenue. The first one became stuck the officers. The British troops took position, setting in the road, while the other lost a wheel and both up Congreve rockets behind homes and shops were abandoned in the face of the advancing British.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Bladensburg Battlefield Tour
    MARYLAND BATTLE OF BLADENSBURG MILESTONES BATTLEFIELD TOUR “The enemy are in full march to Washington, Have the materials prepared to destroy the bridges... PS – You had better remove the records.” - Secretary of State James Monroe in a letter to President Madison, August 23, 1814 During the War of 1812, — 50 miles south of Bladensburg. The British forces had control of the goal was to burn Capitol and federal Chesapeake Bay for over a year by buildings. the summer of 1814. A U.S. military command was created under Brigadier Secretary of State James Monroe General William Winder for the defense was sent to spy on the British troops. of Washington, D.C., Maryland, and He reported them “in full march.” eastern Virginia. Secretary of War John President Madison ordered two bridges Armstrong believed these forces would across the Eastern Branch of the be enough to protect the Capitol and Potomac (Anacostia River) destroyed to the region. protect the Capitol, leaving the bridge at Bladensburg as the only crossing. On August 20, 1814, under the American troops were sent toward command of Major General Robert Upper Marlborough to meet the British, but quickly retreated upon seeing the Ross over 4,500 seasoned British President James Madison Secretary of State James Monroe Brigadier General William Winder troops landed at Benedict, Maryland superior size of the British forces. by James Vanderlyn by Samuel Morse by Charles Saint-Mémin White House Historical Association White House Historical Association Library of Congress The British Attack 1 (NUMBERS DENOTE LOCATIONS ON MAP ON REAR.) At noon, British August 23, 1814 - Overnight in Bladensburg, General Winder forces entered Bladensburg.
    [Show full text]
  • County Executive Prince George's County Launches War of 1812
    County Executive Prince George's County, Maryland Prince George’s County Launches War of 1812 Bicentennial Commemoration Events For Immediate Release: 7/25/2014 6:00 PM Contact: Scott L. Peterson | (240) 619-9400 Events begin this weekend with “Muster the Militia” Open House in Riverdale Park and “Bursting in Air” Arts Happening in Hyattsville and culminating with Undaunted Weekend: The 200th Anniversary of the Battle of Bladensburg, August 23-24 Upper Marlboro, MD – This summer, Prince George’s County, along with the District of Columbia, City of Baltimore, and jurisdictions around the region are commemorating the 200th anniversary of events of the 1814 Chesapeake Campaign during the War of 1812. During the summer of 1814, British ships and soldiers invaded the region, created slave revolts, burned down towns and villages, and ultimately marched on our nation’s young capital by defeating a militia at the Battle of Bladensburg on August 24, 1814 that led to the eventual burning of the White House and U.S. Capitol. Three weeks later on September 12-15, 1814, the nation made a triumphant stand against the British at the Battle of Baltimore that was forever enshrined in our country’s history through the words of Francis Scott Key’s Star Spangled Banner – which later became our national anthem. “It is a very special two months in Prince George’s County, the State of Maryland, and the District of Columbia as we commemorate the 200th anniversary of events that saved this nation’s existence,” said Prince George’s County Executive Rushern L. Baker, III.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 2000, Volume 95, Issue No. 2
    ^5C6gg M'^H HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY Summer 2000 ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND M X R Y L A N D Historical Magazine > > THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Managing Editor Donna Blair Shear, Associate Editor David Prencipe, Photographer Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T. George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Mary Markey, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee/Ghair John S. Bainbridge Jr., Baltimore Gounty Jean H. Baker, Goucher College James H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's City Commission Suzanne E. Ghapelle, Morgan State University Toby L. Ditz, The Johns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland lack G. Goellner, Baltimore Roland C. McConnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Charles W. Mitchell, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins John G. Van Osdell, Towson University Alan R. Walden, WBAL, Baltimore Brian Weese, Bibelot, Inc., Pikesville Members Emeritus John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Charles McC. Mathias, Chevy Chase ISSN 0025-4258 © 2000 by the Maryland Historical Society. Published as a benefit of membership in the Maryland Historical Society in March, June, September, and December. Articles appearing in this journal are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and/or America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendors-And-Contractors-Report.Pdf
    R55PU025 Anne Arundel County 01/21/21 11:36:23 PHPAIG0003 Dollars by Vendor Page - 1 01/01/20 To 12/31/20 Address Amount Alpha Address Postal City ST Number Paid Name Code 415383 6,959.38 A & G MANAGEMENT CO INC SUITE 300 - 20 S CHARLES ST 21201 BALTIMORE MD 511673 164,998.45 A & S UNLIMITED CONSTRUCTION LLC PO BOX 882 20718 BOWIE MD 105045 764,307,617.54 A A CO BOARD OF EDUCATION PO BOX 630836 212630836 BALTIMORE MD 105046 95,199,999.82 A A CO BOARD OF EDUCATION 2644 RIVA ROAD 21401 ANNAPOLIS MD 370281 115,000.00 A A CO FOOD & RESOURCE BANK PO BOX 650 21032 CROWNSVILLE MD 105079 1,018,034.67 A A CO PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2644 RIVA ROAD 21401 ANNAPOLIS MD ATTN: MARVIN CHARLES 270610 15,688.92 A A CO VOL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC PO BOX 1230 21146 SEVERNA PARK MD 507688 109,468.00 A BRIGHT IDEA LLC 210 ARCHER ST 21014 BEL AIR MD 105150 406,916.05 A C SCHULTES OF MARYLAND 8221 CLOVERLEAF DR 21108 MILLERSVILLE MD 374179 322,598.57 A C SCHULTES OF MARYLAND INC 8221 CLOVERLEAF DR 21108 MILLERSVILLE MD 454964 44,185.38 A HEART FELT HOME LLC 513 DOGWOOD DR 21061 GLEN BURNIE MD 399277 440,808.83 A MORTON THOMAS & ASSOC INC 800 KING FARM BLVD 4TH FLR 20850 ROCKVILLE MD 532373 45,585.00 A STEP TO WELLNESS LLC 1826 ENCORE TERRACE 21146 SEVERN MD 105262 7,958.80 A T & T PO BOX 5019 60197-5019 CAROL STREAM IL 479341 42,437.02 A T & T PO BOX 5094 60197-5094 CAROL STREAM IL 422674 139,162.81 A T & T MOBILITY LLC 7855 WALKER DR 1ST FLOOR 20770 GREENBELT MD 530051 142,549.06 A T & T MOBILITY LLC DBA FIRST NET 60197-6463 CAROL STREAM IL PO BOX 6463 477143 21,060.00 A TO Z DATABASES 11211 JOHN GALT BLVD 68137 OMAHA NE 105148 1,012,858.54 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Name 6. Representation in Existing Surveys
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_____________ 1. Name historic Compton Bassett and/or common Compton Bassett 2. Location street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike N/A not for publication city, town Upper Marlboro _X_ vicinity of congressional district Fourth state Maryland code county Prince George's code 033 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public _ X. occupied X agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X not applicable X no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Robert B. Sasscer and Henry S. Sasscer street & number 16508 Marlboro Pike city, town Upper Marlboro vicinity of state Maryland 20870 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Prince George's County Courthouse street & number city, town Upper Marlboro state Maryland 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title See Continuation Sheet #1 has this property been determined elegible? __ yes JL_ no date X federal X state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one _ X excellent deteriorated unaltered X original site good ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Compton Bassett is a Georgian mansion built ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Mchenry Lessons Grade 4 – MSDE Voluntary State Curriculum Standards
    Fort McHenry Lessons Grade 4 – MSDE Voluntary State Curriculum Standards Lesson 1. Where in the World is Baltimore? (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 2. Why Baltimore? (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 3. Now Where Do We Place the Fort? (1 Resource Sheet) Lesson 4. The Star Fort (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 5. Defenders of the Fort (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 6. An African American Soldier Defends Fort McHenry (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 7. Fort McHenry Measurements Today (1 Resource Sheet) Lesson 8. The Great Garrison Flag (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 9. Francis Scott Key (3 Resource Sheets) Lesson 10. “The Star-Spangled Banner” (2 Resource Sheets) Lesson 11. The History of Fort McHenry (2 Resource Sheets) Where in the World is Baltimore? Grade: 4 Class Periods/Duration: 1 class period VSC Standards/Indicators: Geography: Students will use geographic concepts and processes to examine the role of culture, technology, and the environment in the location and distribution of human activities and spatial connections throughout time. 3.A.1. Locate places and describe the human and physical characteristics of those places using geographic tools. Social Studies Skills and Processes: Students shall use reading, writing, and thinking processes and skills to gain knowledge and understanding of political, historical and current events using chronological and spatial thinking, economic reasoning, and historical interpretation, by framing and evaluating questions from primary and secondary sources. 6.F.1. Interpret information from primary and secondary sources. a. Interpret information in maps, charts and graphs. Objectives: 1. Students will locate Baltimore in relation to the sailing trade routes of Great Britain.
    [Show full text]