DOCSLIB.ORG

Shell Keep Castle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shell Keep Castle Fantasy Floorplans Shell Keep Castle Sample file Cornelius Clifford Shell Keep Castle Fantasy Floorplans A sound example of an early medieval ‘shell keep’ castle. Loosely based on real extant examples in the west country of England. Traditional medieval layouts and plans, designed for fantasy role playing games, includes floor plans, room descriptions and construction. Page Contents 3 Outer defences 5 Ground Floor 7 First floor 9 Battlements Sample file First published in 2012 by DreamWorlds Text and illustrations copyright © 2012 Cornelius Clifford All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any way or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. www . Dream -Worlds . co. uk Shell Keep Castle ~ Outer defences The Shell Keep is one of the earliest forms of They are large enough to allow the defenders to medieval castle; effectively a development on from shoot any attacker approaching the castle from any the early motte and bailey castles. When these first direction. But The arrow slits on the outside would castles where built a large mound of earth (the motte) be too small for a man to get his hand in. was thrown up, a timber keep (or tower) built upon the summit and then a ditch and wooden palisade Drawbridge (the bailey) created a defended area around the The main road into the shell keep is ramped up to motte, completing the fortification and making two cross over the ditch by way of a drawbridge. Carts lines of defence. The Normans used this type of and wagons with supplies, and mounted troops, all castle to great effect when they conquered England enter the castle via this entrance. The Drawbridge is a and they built an enormous number of them. Motte massive slab of timber (probably oak) hinged on the and bailey castles were quick to build. Local, readily inside and supported by chains going back into the available materials are used (earth and timber) and gatehouse. The chains go around drums which can they make a strong enough form of defence to be wound around, pulling or ‘drawing’ the bridge up. withstand the attacks of the native English (Anglo In the upright position the drawbridge is another line Saxons in the main.) Later on the timber tower could of defence that must be broken down before the be replaced with a stone keep, usually square or castle can be entered by this gate. rectangular. The palisade might also be replaced with a stone wall, possibly re-enforced with towers. East gate However, there was a potentially serious flaw in this This is a small back entrance, a way of escape and development; a man-made pile of earth (the original sallying out to attack an enemy in the rear, perhaps. motte) does not a good foundation make. If the original motte was built to take advantage of a natural Murder Holes promontory (as they often were) then the underlying If an attacking force manages to break down the rock will support the weight of a massive stone keep. drawbridge and portcullis, plus a stout oak door, they However, if the motte was just earth, it will not. A then find themselves in a chamber with a number of solution used in outlying, and relatively unimportant holes in the ceiling. The defenders can then use these locations, was the shell keep. Effectively a fairly light- holes to pour boiling oil, hot sand or tar, or even weight stone wall is built around the top of the shoot arrows, down upon the heads of the luckless motte, enclosing the round and level summit.Sample Lining attackers; file very nasty! the inside of this wall would be the hall, domestic buildings and so forth. Effectively this is a merging Outer defences of the outer wall (the bailey) and the inner keep into The round shell keep stands raised up on an earth one structure. In the centre of the round fortification mound. The banks are steep on all sides and very thus created, there is an open area or court. There are difficult to climb. A ditch is dug around the motte or other reasons for building a round shell ‘keep’ castle mound, in later times this becomes the moat, and is rather than the motte and bailey; maybe because the filled with water. But supplying and retaining water in surrounding land was level, or there are no natural such a situation is not straightforward, so a ditch is promontories to put to use. Most shell keep castles often thought adequate. Earthworks, or dikes, are have disappeared, as have a good number of the thrown up to reinforce the defence of each entrance. motte and bailey castles. As the native population becomes subdued, less and less castles are needed Portcullis and the unimportant ones are abandoned or knocked Behind the drawbridge, the next line of defence is the down. Shell keeps are common in the west country portcullis, this could be made from solid oak and re- of England, and there are several good surviving enforced with iron. But was often made from a grid examples in Devon and Cornwall. of iron bars, riveted together. The portcullis can be raised by another winding mechanism, pulling it up Arrow slits into a void in order to allow access into the castle. All around the ground floor there are a goodly The Portcullis is bedded in a deep stone groove, number of arrow slits, these are splayed inside. making it incredibly difficult to smash down. www . Dream-Worlds . co. uk copyright Cornelius Clifford © 2012 Shell Keep Castle ~ Outer defences Sample file www . Dream-Worlds . co. uk copyright Cornelius Clifford © 2012 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Castle Designs Through History: from Simple Mounds to Strong Towers
    https://www.exploring-castles.com/castle_designs/ Castle Designs Through History: From Simple Mounds to Strong Towers Castle designs have changed over history. This is because of changes in technology over time – as well as changes to the function and purpose of castles. The first castles were simply ‘mounds’ of earth, and medieval castle designs improved on these basics – adding ditches in the Motte & Bailey design. As technology advanced – and as attackers got more sophisticated – elaborate concentric castle designs emerged, creating a fortress almost impregnable to its enemies. Nowadays, castles are designed for prestige, for fantasy, and to embellish a romantic view of the life of kings, queens and nobles from years gone by. This page gives a brief overview of the history of castles, and explains why different castle designs came about. Fundamentally, these changing designs were due to the changes in the purpose and significance of castles. Early Medieval Times From Norman Times: Motte & Bailey Castles – Simple designs that were quick to build The first castles, built in the Early Middle Ages (early Medieval period), were ‘earthworks’ – mounds of earth primarily built for defence, as enemies struggled to climb them. During the 1000s, the Normans developed these into Motte and Bailey castle designs. Effectively, a ‘Motte’ was a large mound of earth, and a ‘Bailey’ was the flattened area beside the mound. The ‘Motte’ could be surrounded with a ditch, and buildings could be placed on the bailey – made of timber or, if time permitted, stone. The key benefit of Motte & Bailey castles was that they were very quick to build, but pretty difficult to attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Keeps-Catalogue1
    Shell-keeps - The Catalogue Fig. 1. Plan of Berkeley Castle prepared for G. T Clark, published in Vol. 1 of Mediaeval Military Architecture, 1884, opposite. p. 229. Berkeley 2. Berkeley er (knocking out an earlier “bastion”) comprising two, Published interpretations of the shell-keep have as- joined rectangular towers which may be an early ex- sumed the following sequence: (a) the motte was part ample of an artillery emplacement and (ii) additions of the castle of William fitzOsbern, documented in and alterations to the forebuilding and (iii) encasement the late 11th century, bearing a structure of which no of the south “bastion” by the new gatehouse to the trace now remains; (b) with the assent and direction inner bailey (e) the siege of 1645 and the slighting of of Henry II in 1154, the new owner, Robert fitzHard- 1646 inflicted damage to the motte and its masonry ing (a rich Bristol merchant, from an English family, structures which were patched up around 1700 (f) who supported the Angevin cause and died in 1170) various 18th- to 20th-century alterations and additions truncated the motte-top, encased the motte in a shell- further masked and/or destroyed the structures, both in keep with battered plinth, a series of pilaster buttress- the domestic ranges (the east range of which is wholly es, (probably) four semi-circular “bastions” and (soon 1920s, as is the rebuilding of the chapel) and in Thor- afterwards) a forebuilding with defended stair rising pe's Tower. from ground level to a doorway on the motte-top, the The castle is unusual in having charter evidence latter being leveled up with the spoil created by relating to its revival under new ownership in the truncating the motte; (c) this shell-keep rose above 1150s, although the authenticity of these charters as the motte, with domestic buildings against its inside contemporary record has been questioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Keeps at Carmarthen Castle and Berkeley Castle
    Fig. 1. A bird's-eye view of Windsor Castle in 1658, by Wenceslaus Hollar (detail). Within the shell-keep are 14th century ranges. From the University of Toronto Wenceslaus Hollar Digital Collection. Reproduced with thanks. Shell-keeps revisited: the bailey on the motte? Robert Higham, BA, PhD, FSA, FRHistS Honorary Fellow, University of Exeter Dedicated to Jo Cox and John Thorp, who revived my interest in this subject at Berkeley Castle Design and illustrations assembled by Neil Guy Published by the Castle Studies Group. © Text: Robert Higham Shell-keeps re-visited: the bailey on the motte? 1 Revision 19 - 05/11/2015 Fig. 2. Lincoln Castle, Lucy Tower, following recent refurbishment. Image: Neil Guy. Abstract Scholarly attention was first paid to the sorts of castle ● that multi-lobed towers built on motte-tops discussed here in the later 18th century. The “shell- should be seen as a separate form; that truly keep” as a particular category has been accepted in circular forms (not on mottes) should be seen as a academic discussion since its promotion as a medieval separate form; design by G.T. Clark in the later 19th century. Major ● that the term “shell-keep” should be reserved for works on castles by Ella Armitage and A. Hamilton mottes with structures built against or integrated Thompson (both in 1912) made interesting observa- with their surrounding wall so as to leave an open, tions on shell-keeps. St John Hope published Windsor central space with inward-looking accommodation; Castle, which has a major example of the type, a year later (1913).
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-8-2020 "The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812 Joseph R. Miller University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Joseph R., ""The Men Were Sick of the Place" : Soldier Illness and Environment in the War of 1812" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3208. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3208 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE MEN WERE SICK OF THE PLACE”: SOLDIER ILLNESS AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE WAR OF 1812 By Joseph R. Miller B.A. North Georgia University, 2003 M.A. University of Maine, 2012 A DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Liam Riordan, Professor of History Kathryn Shively, Associate Professor of History, Virginia Commonwealth University James Campbell, Professor of Joint, Air War College, Brigadier General (ret) Michael Robbins, Associate Research Professor of Psychology Copyright 2020 Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norman Conquest Learning Objective: to Understand Chronology, Sources and Factors Through the History of the Norman Conquest of England
    Year 7) Term 2A: The Norman Conquest Learning objective: To understand chronology, sources and factors through the history of the Norman Conquest of England. What do I need to know about William and his coronation as king? KEYWORDS: • The coronation of William of Normandy on Christmas Day 1066. Chronology = events put in the • How Anglo-Saxon people reacted to the new Norman king. order that they happened. • What William wanted to do next. Sources = evidence from the past. What do I need to know about the Norman Conquest? Interpretations = a persons • How William created a Feudal System hierarchy. opinion on a historical event. • How William used the Domesday Book to collect information. Key events/people: • How William created Motte & Bailey Castles to scare the English. William the Conqueror/William • How the Bayeux Tapestry controlled history. of Normandy The Feudal System What do I need to know about the Harrying of the North? The Domesday Book • Why William decided to launch an attack on the North. Motte & Bailey Castles • What tactics William used when attacking the North. The Bayeux Tapestry • How England changed under the reign of William of Normandy. The Harrying of the North 25 December 1066 AD 1067-86 AD 1069 AD William is coroneted as Motte & Bailey castles are created and William launches an assault on the Northern rebels: The King of England. the Domesday Book is completed. Harrying of the North begins and ends. What first-order concepts do I need to learn below? Hint: remember! A first-order concept is a word historians use to describe facts related to events.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reappraisal of the Date, Architectural Context and Significance of the Great Tower of Dudley Castle Hislop, Malcolm
    University of Birmingham A missing link: a reappraisal of the date, architectural context and significance of the great tower of Dudley Castle Hislop, Malcolm DOI: 10.1017/S000358150999045X Citation for published version (Harvard): Hislop, M 2010, 'A missing link: a reappraisal of the date, architectural context and significance of the great tower of Dudley Castle', The Antiquaries Journal, vol. 90, pp. 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000358150999045X Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Symbols: Royal and Lordly Residence
    Royal and Lordly Residence in Scotland c.1050 to c.1250: an Historiographical Review and Critical Revision1 Richard D Oram Abstract Academic study of eleventh to thirteenth century high status residence in Scotland has been largely bypassed by the English debates over origin, function and symbolism. Archaeologists have also been slow to engage with three decades of historical revision of traditional socio- economic, cultural and political models upon which their interpretations of royal and lordly residence have drawn. Scottish castle-studies of the pre-1250 era continue to be framed by a ‘military architecture’ historiographical tradition and a view of the castle as an alien artefact imposed on the land by foreign adventurers and a ‘modernising’ monarchy and native Gaelic nobility. Knowledge and understanding of pre-twelfth century native high status sites is rudimentary and derived primarily from often inappropriate analogy with English examples. Discussion of native responses to the imported castle-building culture is founded upon retrospective projection of inappropriate later medieval social and economic models and anachronistic perceptions of military colonialism. Cultural and socio-economic difference is rarely recognised in archaeological modelling and cultural determinism has distorted perceptions of structural form, social status and material values. A programme of interdisciplinary studies focused on specific sites is necessary to provide a corrective to this current situation. One of the central themes in the traditional historiography of medieval Scotland is that in parallel with the emergence from the late 1000s of an identifiable noble stratum comparable to the aristocratic hierarchies of Norman England and Frankish Europe there was an attendant development of new forms in the physical expression of lordship.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Keeps-Catalogue1
    Shell-keeps - The Catalogue Fig. 1. Arundel Castle. The shell-keep, well tower and forebuilding from the south-east (lower bailey). The original Norman door is half-hidden by the later forebuilding. Arundel 1. Arundel The shell-keep, with pilaster buttresses, occupies a bore some similarity to Gisors, in Normandy. All large motte (with two baileys) of a castle established commentators have noted the broad similarity - mottes before 1086 by Roger de Montgomery. It had both a with two baileys - of the plans of Arundel and Windsor. defensive character (forebuilding with portcullis; wing The site poses major issues of interpretation. walls with approaching stairs; battlemented wall- Restoration work of circa 1900 (and later) involved walk) and residential character (chapel in forebuilding; rebuilding the wall-walk and battlements (are the deep well in adjoining tower; upper floor fireplace; shutters based on fixings found in original masonry ground-floor oven; vaulted store undercroft within or simply fantasy?); adding much new face-work; motte; garderobe on wall-walk). External views were renovating the forebuilding and well-tower; and from the wall-walk only (no windows in outer wall). possibly re-fixing details in wrong places (e.g. internal Published comments often assume that (a) the motte corbels). It is not certain that the present forebuilding is eleventh century (b) the shell-keep was built by chapel represents a medieval predecessor. There is a William d’Albini in around 1140 (c ) the forebuilding band of ashlar at first-floor level and the assumption was added later (suggestions range from late 12th of two-storey ranges (reconstruction drawing in -14th century).
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary
    Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s scheduling selection guides help to define which archaeological sites are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. For archaeological sites and monuments, they are divided into categories ranging from Agriculture to Utilities and complement the listing selection guides for buildings. Scheduling is applied only to sites of national importance, and even then only if it is the best means of protection. Only deliberately created structures, features and remains can be scheduled. The scheduling selection guides are supplemented by the Introductions to Heritage Assets which provide more detailed considerations of specific archaeological sites and monuments. This selection guide offers an overview of archaeological monuments or sites designed to have a military function and likely to be deemed to have national importance, and sets out criteria to establish for which of those scheduling may be appropriate. The guide aims to do two things: to set these sites within their historical context, and to give an introduction to some of the overarching and more specific designation considerations. This document has been prepared by Listing Group. It is one is of a series of 18 documents. This edition published by Historic England July 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Pre-1500 Military Sites: Scheduling Selection Guide. Swindon. Historic England. HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/scheduling-selection/ Front cover The castle at Burton-in-Lonsdale, North Yorkshire was built around 1100 as a ringwork; later it was reconstructed as a motte with two baileys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact Off Crusader Castles Upon European Western Castles
    THE IMPACT OF CRUSADER CASTLES UPON EUROPEAN WESTERN CASTLES IN THE MIDDLE AGES JORDAN HAMPE MAY 2009 A SENIOR PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- LA CROSSE Abstract: During the Middle Ages, the period from roughly AD 1000-1450, the structure of castles changed greatly from wooden motte and bailey to stone keeps and defenses within stone city walls. The reason for the change was largely influenced by the crusades as Europeans went to the Holy Lands to conquer. In addition to conquering, these kings brought back a new way of designing and fortifying their castles in England, Wales and France. Without the influence of the crusades, what we think of as true middle age castles would not exist. For my paper I will analyze the impact the crusades had on forming the middle age castles by evidence surviving in the archaeological record from before and after the crusades as well as modifications done on castles to accommodate crusader changes to show the drastic influence of crusader castle fortifications upon English, Welsh and French castles. 1 Introduction Construction of what is believed to be true middle age castles from A.D. 1000 to 1450 began as kings arrived back from the crusades to the Holy Lands, bringing with them ideas of how to make their castles grander and more easily defensible. Before the crusades William I of England was beginning to develop a new concentric style of castle beginning with the Tower of London. After the crusades many English, Welsh and French kings took the concentric concept and combined it with what they saw on the crusades and developed it to become majestic castles and fortresses like Chateau Gaillard in France, Dover Castle in England, and Caernarvon Castle in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Castle Conservation Report
    A CONSERVATION PLAN for ELIZABETHCASTLE, JERSEY Prepared for the JERSEY HERITAGE TRUST MAY 2006 A CONSERVATION PLAN for ELIZABETH CASTLE, JERSEY CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………. ……. 1 INTRODUCTION ……………………… PART ONE : SIGNIFICANCE 1.0 UNDERSTANDING THE SITE 1.0.1 Historical Development Period 1 : 1594-1603 Period 2 : Seventeenth century Period 3 : Eighteenth century Period 4 : Nineteenth century Period 5 : Twentieth century 1.0.2 Description Upper Ward Lower Ward Charles Fort Outer Ward Hermitage Rock 1.1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 1.2 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 1.2.1 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 1.2.2 ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS PART TWO : CONSERVATION POLICY 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 VULNERABILITY 2.3 ISSUES 2.4 CONSERVATION PLAN POLICIES 2.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW SUPPORTING INFORMATION References and bibliography Appendix 1 : Archival sources in the Jersey Archives Appendix 2 : Archival sources in the library of the Société Jersiaise Appendix 3 : Archival sources in The National Archives Appendix 4 : Archival sources in The British Library Figures 1-19 Prepared for the JERSEY HERITAGE TRUST MAY 2006 PART ONE : SIGNIFICANCE _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 UNDERSTANDING THE SITE n order to obtain a clear understanding of the heritage significance of IElizabeth Castle, Hermitage Rock, and the breakwater linking the two it is proposed to first review their historical development (Section 1.0.1) and then provide a description of the surviving structures in some detail (Section 1.0.2).1 Whilst the primary purpose of the Conservation Plan is to inform and advise discussions and decisions concerning the preservation and use of the standing structures, it is recognised that some buildings have been demolished but their remains, or parts of them, may well survive under the surface.
    [Show full text]