DOCSLIB.ORG

Callback Scenes & Monologues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Callback Scenes & Monologues CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 1 Julius (Romeo & Juliet) SITUATION: Julius, a young man, is finding himself in love with Romeo, a young man who he just met at a party. Now, that young man has appeared outside Julius’ bedroom window. JULIUS Dost thou love me? I know thou wilt say 'Ay,'and I will take thy word. Yet if thou swear'st, thhou mayst prove false. At lovers' perjuries they say, Jove laughs. O gentle Romeo, if thou dost love, pronounce it faithfully. Or if thou think'st I am too quickly won, I'll frown and be perverse and say thee nay, So thou wilt woo. In truth, fair Montague, I am too fond, And therefore thou mayst think my 'havior light. But trust me, gentleman, I'll prove more true Than those that have more cunning to be strange. I should have been more strange, I must confess, But that thou overheard'st, ere I was ware, My true love's passion. Therefore pardon me, And not impute this yielding to light love. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 2 Portia (Julius Caesar) Situation: The speaker is an ailing man who is addressing his wife. She is a powerful political figure, and appears distressed by a secret agitation. You have ungently stole from our bed: and yesternight, at supper, You suddenly arose, and walk'd about, Musing and sighing, with your arms across. And when I ask'd you what the matter was, You too impatiently stamp'd with your foot. And with an angry wafture of your hand, Gave sign for me to leave you. so I did. This affliction will not let you eat, nor talk, nor sleep, And could it work so much upon your shape As it hath much prevail'd on your condition, I should not know you. Dearest wife, make me acquainted with your cause of grief. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 3 Emilia (The Two Noble Kinsmen) SITUATION: A young woman remembers a friend who has died. The love she felt for her friend leaves her unable to love any man. EMILIA: I was acquainted once with a time when I enjoyed a playfellow. She was too young when she the grave enriched, Who made too proud the bed. I and she were things innocent, But we each other loved. What she liked, was then of me approved, what not, condemned. The flower that I would pluck and put between my breasts— O, then but beginning to swell about the blossom— she would seek till she had such another, and commit it to the like innocent cradle, where, Phoenix-like, they died in perfume. Her clothing—pretty, Though haply hers careless were— I followed for my most serious decking. Had mine ear stol’n some new tune, or perhaps hummed one From musical coinage, why, it was a song whereon her spirits would dwell— And sing it in her slumbers. This story has this end, That the true love ’tween maid and maid may be More than this of different sex. I shall never—Love any that’s called man. I am sure I shall not. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 4 Margaret (Henry VI, Part 3) Situation: Margaret has just learned that her husband has made a deal with his enemies. They will allow him to remain king until he dies, but afterwards, his son will not become king. Ah, wretched man! Would I had died a maid and never seen thee, never borne thee son, Seeing thou hast proved so unnatural a father. Hath thy son deserved to lose his birthright thus? Hadst thou but loved him half so well as I, Or felt that pain which I did for him once, Or nourish'd him as I did with my blood, Thou wouldst have left thy dearest heart-blood there, Rather than have disinherited thine only son. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 5 Lord Capulet (Romeo and Juliet) Situation: Lord Capulet has arranged a marriage between his daughter, Juliet, and a rich young man, Paris. Juliet has just informed her father that she does not wish to marry Paris. CAPULET God's bread! it makes me mad: Day, night, hour, tide, time, work, play, Alone, in company, still my care hath been To have you match'd: and having now provided A gentleman of noble parentage, Of fair demesnes, youthful, and nobly train'd, Stuff'd, as they say, with honourable parts, Proportion'd as one's thought would wish a man; And then to have a wretched puling fool, To answer 'I'll not wed; I cannot love; I pray you, pardon me.' But, as you will not wed, I'll pardon you: Graze where you will you shall not house with me: Look to't, think on't, I do not use to jest. Thursday is near; lay hand on heart, advise: An you be mine, I'll give you to my friend; And you be not, hang, beg, starve, die in the streets, For, by my soul, I'll ne'er acknowledge thee, Nor what is mine shall never do thee good: Trust to't, bethink you; I'll not be forsworn. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 6 Decius Brutus (Julius Caesar) Situation: Decius is in on a plot to assassinate Caesar. Decius has just arrived at the home of Caesar to escort Caesar to the Senate where the assassination is to occur. Caesar has decided not to go out today because Calpurnia, Caesar’s wife, has had an ominous dream warning of great danger if Caesar should leave the house. Decius must convince Caesar that the dream is a sign of good things to come. DECIUS. This dream is all amiss interpreted; It was a vision fair and fortunate. Your statue spouting blood in many pipes, In which so many smiling Romans bathed, Signifies that from you great Rome shall suck Reviving blood. This by Calpurnia's dream is signified. And know it now, the Senate have concluded To give this day a crown to mighty Caesar. If you shall send them word you will not come, Their minds may change. Besides, it were a mock Apt to be render'd, for someone to say "Break up the Senate till another time, When Caesar's wife shall meet with better dreams." If Caesar hide, shall they not whisper "Lo, Caesar is afraid"? Pardon me, Caesar, for my dear dear love To your advancement bids me tell you this, And reason to my love is liable. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 7 Narrator William Shakespeare: the most produced playwright in the history of the world. His insights into the human condition have resonated with global audiences for over four centuries. But like most playwrights, Shakespeare’s plays are heavily influenced by the culture of the time in which his plays were written . Words like “homosexual,” “lesbian,” and “bisexual” did not exist in Elizabethan language. And sexual encounters between same-sex couples were illegal and societally scorned. So, although gay love certainly existed in Elizabethan England it was most like camouflaged. So, some of Shakespeare’s plays, such as As You Like It and Twelfth Night, derive amusement from some such flirtations. And most of Shakespeare’s sonnets are written to his “lovely boy,” It is not a great stretch to imagine a sexual yearning in those sonnets. CALLBACK MONOLOGUE 8 Prince Henry (Henry IV, Part 1) PRINCE HENRY I know you all, and will awhile uphold The unyoked humor of your idleness: Yet herein will I imitate the sun, Who doth permit the base contagious clouds To smother up her beauty from the world, That, when she please again to be herself, Being wanted, she may be more wonder'd at, By breaking through the foul and ugly mists Of vapors that did seem to strangle her. If all the year were playing holidays, To sport would be as tedious as to work; But when they seldom come, they wish'd for come, And nothing pleaseth but rare accidents. CALLBACK SCENE A Romeo & Julius (Romeo & Juliet) Situation: Two teenage boys, from feuding families, have met at a party. It was love at first sight. Later the same night, Romeo has shown up in Julius’ backyard to confess his love for Julius. JULIUS: Dost thou love me? ROMEO: By yonder blessed moon I swear-- JULIUS: O, swear not by the moon, the inconstant moon, That monthly changes in her circled orb, Lest that thy love prove likewise variable. ROMEO: What shall I swear by? JULIUS: Do not swear at all; Or, if thou wilt, swear by thy gracious self, Which is the god of my idolatry, And I'll believe thee. ROMEO: If my heart's dear love— JULIUS: Well, do not swear: although I joy in thee, I have no joy of this contract to-night: It is too rash, too unadvised, too sudden; Too like the lightning, which doth cease to be Ere one can say 'It lightens.' Sweet, good night! ROMEO: O, wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied? JULIUS: What satisfaction canst thou have to-night? ROMEO: The exchange of thy love's faithful vow for mine. JULIUS: I gave thee mine before thou didst request it: And yet I would it were to give again. ROMEO: Wouldst thou withdraw it? for what purpose, love? JULIUS: But to be frank, and give it thee again. And yet I wish but for the thing I have: My bounty is as boundless as the sea, My love as deep; the more I give to thee, The more I have, for both are infinite. Nurse calls within I hear some noise within; dear love, adieu! Stay but a little, I will come again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula. Erin Leigh Wotring University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wotring, Erin Leigh, "The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2691. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2691 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Erin Leigh Wotring All rights reserved THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Approved on April 14, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Jennifer Westerfeld, Director Dr. Blake Beattie Dr. Carmen Hardin ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero a Study of Gamesmanship in the Late
    CICERO A STUDY OF GAMESMANSHIP IN THE LATE REPUBLIC A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History by Eugene H. Boyd FALL 2018 © 2018 Eugene H. Boyd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii CICERO A STUDY OF GAMESMAN SHIP IN THE LATE REPUBLIC A Thesis by Eugene H. Boyd Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Nikolaos Lazaridis, PhD. __________________________________, Second Reader Jeffrey Brodd, PhD. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Eugene H. Boyd I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Jeffrey Wilson, PhD Date Department of History iv Abstract of CICERO A STUDY OF GAMESMANSHIP IN THE LATE REPUBLIC by Eugene H. Boyd Roman politics during the final decades of the Late Republic was a vicious process of gamesmanship wherein lives of people, their families and friends were at the mercy of the gamesmen. Cicero’s public and political gamesmanship reflects the politics, class and ethnic biases of Roman society and how random events impacted personal insecurities. ______________________ _, Committee Chair Nikolaos Lazaridis, PhD. ____________________________ Date v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The process of obtaining a Master’s degree, I have found, is not an independent, isolated experience. Citing a contemporary adage, “It takes a village.” Truer words have never by spoken. To that end, I would like to recognize in the most warmly and thankful manner, the people in my “village” who helped me through the graduate study program and eventual master’s degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Milone: the Purposes of Cicero’S Published Defense Of
    PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE (Under the Direction of James C. Anderson, Jr.) ABSTRACT This thesis explores the trial of T. Annius Milo for the murder of P. Clodius Pulcher, which occurred in Rome in 52 BC, and the events leading up to it, as well as Marcus Tullius Cicero’s defense of Milo and his later published version of that defense. The thesis examines the purposes for Cicero’s publication of the speech because Cicero failed to acquit his client, and yet still published his defense. Before specifically examining Cicero’s goals for his publication, this thesis considers relationships between the parties involved in the trial, as well as the conflicting accounts of the murder; it then observes the volatile events and novel procedure surrounding the trial; and it also surveys the unusual topographic setting of the trial. Finally, this thesis considers the differences between the published speech and the speech delivered at trial, the timing of its publication, and possible political and philosophical purposes. INDEX WORDS: Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Milone, Titus Annius Milo, Publius Clodius Pulcher, Pompey, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Roman Courts, Roman Trials, Roman Criminal Procedure, Ancient Criminal Procedure, Roman Rhetoric, Latin Rhetoric, Ancient Rhetoric, Roman Speeches, Roman Defense Speeches, Roman Topography, Roman Forum, Roman Philosophy, Roman Stoicism, Roman Natural Law, Roman Politics PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE B.A. Philosophy, Georgia State University, 1995 J.D., University of Georgia, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Robert Christian Rutledge All Rights Reserved PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T.
    [Show full text]
  • Essa É a TESE
    Constructing Men and Women The Use of Morality in Literary Character Representation During Times of Crisis Larissa Lemos Student Number: 1007524 Supervisor: Dr. Lien Foubert Second Reader: Dr. Cornelis Willem van Galen Word Count: 15.000 Larissa Henrique dos Santos Lemos 15 August 2019 Nijmegen, The Netherlands Table of Contents Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………….……….. i. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….…………….1 1. Status Quaestionis ……………………………………………………..……………………….3 2. Method ……………………………………………………….………………………..6 3. Sources …………………………………………………….…………………………..7 4. Structure ……………………………………………………..………………………..11 1. Roman Men, Roman Women: Reality and Ideal ………………………………..…………12 1.1. Roman Lives: Men and Women ………………………………………….…………12 1.2. Roman Ideals of Femininity and Masculinity ………………………………………18 1.3. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………..….. 25 2. What Lies Behind Mos: Morality and Immorality in the Late Republic…………………27 2.1. The Conception of Morality in Roman Thought …………………………………….27 2.2. Behaviour as Signifiers of Immorality……………………………………..…………31 2.2.1 Mollitia ………………………………………………………..…………..32 2.2.2 Adultery ……………………………………………………………..…….34 2.3. The Consequence of Immorality and Its Advantageous Political Use ………………37 2.4. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………..41 3. Mos and Character Representation ………………………………………………………..42 3.1. Literary Construction of Characters..……………………………………………….42 3.1.1. Cicero’s Mark Antony and Octavian …………………………………….43 3.1.2. Plutarch’s Fulvia, Cleopatra and Octavia……………………………….50 3.2 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………59
    [Show full text]
  • "Teaching Transgressive Roman Women: the Persona of Fulvia in Cicero's Philippics"
    "Teaching Transgressive Roman Women: The Persona of Fulvia in Cicero’s Philippics" Ann R. Raia, The College of New Rochelle The Historical Fulvia: a brief review Fulvia is unique among Republican women for the number of ancient texts in which she appears, both contemporary and those written generations after her death. She played a significant if brief role in the struggle that contributed to the constitutional crisis of the late Republic and in the chaos that followed the assassination of Julius Caesar (March 15, 44 BCE). Nevertheless, the historical Fulvia remains essentially unknowable, even in regard to the basic facts of her life. This is partly a result of her sex: as a woman in Republican Rome, she could participate in few activities that would make her worthy of record until she challenged male prerogatives. In addition, not a single word of her own has survived – not even her letters, of which there is evidence – which could provide insight into her thoughts and motivations for her behavior which others freely construct. Finally, and most importantly, the living Fulvia has been effaced by narratives written by Republicans hostile to Antony, like Cicero, by the victor of the civil wars, Octavian, and by later historians like Appian & Dio who relied on propaganda and Augustus’ lost Memoirs to reconstruct the events of the civil war. Not surprisingly, material evidence is scanty: it consists of possible portrait busts on Victory coins, crude insults on sling bullets from Perugia, and a possible marble head. Those seeking to discover the historical Fulvia behind Paterculus’ charge that there was nothing feminine about her except her body nihil muliebre praeter corpus gerens (Roman History 2.74) must engage feminist strategies for reading between the lines for what is left unsaid about her, set her conduct within the brutality of the civil wars, and question the bias of surviving evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Clodia, Fulvia, Livia, Messalina: What Can We Really Learn About the Elite Women of Rome?
    Clodia, Fulvia, Livia, Messalina: what can we really learn about the elite women of Rome? ‘A dissertation submitted to the University of Wales Trinity Saint David in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts’ 29001652 Jacqueline Margaret Meredith 2014 Master’s Degrees by Examination and Dissertation Declaration Form. 1. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 2. This dissertation is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 3. This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 4. I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying, inter-library loan, and for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 Supervisor’s Declaration. I am satisfied that this work is the result of the student’s own efforts. Name: …………………………………………………………………………... Date: ……………………………………………………………………………... Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................... 5 Introduction and literature review ........................................................... 6 Women in the Late Republic .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Background
    APPENDIX THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND All dates are B. C. I 06 Birth of Pompey and Cicero. 100 Sixth consulate of Marius. Birth of Julius Caesar. Ca. 100: publication of Meleager's Garland. ca. 97 Birth of Lucretius. 91-89 Social or Marsic War: Rome v. Italian Allies. 89-85 First Mithridatic War. 88 Sulla's march on Rome. Flight of Marius. 88-83 Sulla in the east. 86 Seventh consulate and death of Marius. Athens sacked by Sulla. Mithridates defeated. ca. 84 Birth of Catullus. 83-82 Civil War. 82-79 Dictatorship of Sulla. 73-71 Slave-revolt of Spartacus. Crushed by Crassus and Pompey. 70 First consulate of Pompey and Crassus. Birth of Virgil (Oct. 15) at Andes near Mantua. Ca. 70: arrival at Rome of the Callimachean Parthenius of Nicaea. ca. 69 Birth of Gallus. 67 Defeat of pirates by Pompey. 66 Lex Manilia confers on Pompey the command against Mithridates. 66-63 Pompey in the east. 65 Birth of Horace at Venusia. 63 Consulate of Cicero. Catilinarian conspiracy. Pompey's settlement of the east. Birth of Octavian, later Augustus (63 B.C.-A.D. 14). 60 Formation of first triumvirate: Caesar, Pompey, Crassus. 59 First consulate of Caesar. Birth of Livy at Padua. 58-49 Caesar in Gaul. 56 Conference at Luca: triumvirate renewed. 55 Second consulate of Pompey and Crassus. Ca. 55: birth of Tibullus. 54 Crassus sets out for Parthia. Death of Julia, Caesar's daughter and Pompey's wife. Ca. 54: deaths of Catullus and Lucretius; publication of De Rerum Natura. Birth of Livy.
    [Show full text]
  • Octavia Minor and the Transition from Republic to Empire Katrina Moore Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2017 Octavia Minor and the Transition from Republic to Empire Katrina Moore Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Moore, Katrina, "Octavia Minor and the Transition from Republic to Empire" (2017). All Theses. 2738. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2738 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OCTAVIA MINOR AND THE TRANSITION FROM REPUBLIC TO EMPIRE A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Katrina Moore August 2017 Accepted by: Dr. Elizabeth Carney, Committee Chair Dr. Stephanie Barczewski Dr. Caroline Dunn Dr. Thomas Kuehn ABSTRACT As a “good girl,” Octavia Minor, older sister to Octavian née Augustus, has been understudied as a historical figure of the Late Roman Republic. Her portrayal as a “good” exempla in the written classical sources obscures Octavia’s agency. This thesis seeks to divest Octavia of her “good girl” reputation, as has been done by other scholars for many “bad girls” of antiquity, such as Cleopatra and Livia. Removing this “good” stereotype will allow for an examination of Octavia’s role in transforming the moral example of a Roman woman from the Republic to the Empire. Through attentive handling of androcentric classical sources, this study will carefully seek to rehabilitate Octavia as an astute, rather than “good” woman.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Fulvia
    A STUDY OF FULVIA by Allison Jean Weir A thesis submitted to the Department of Classics In conformity with the requirements for The degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada December 2007 copyright © Allison Jean Weir 2007 Abstract Who was Fulvia? Was she the politically aggressive and dominating wife of Mark Antony as Cicero and Plutarch describe her? Or was she a loyal mother and wife, as Asconius and Appian suggest? These contrasting accounts in the ancient sources warrant further investigation. This thesis seeks to explore the nature of Fulvia’s role in history to the extent that the evidence permits. Fulvia is most famous for her activities during Antony’s consulship (44 BC) and his brother Lucius Antonius’ struggle against C. Octavian in the Perusine War (41-40 BC). But there is a discrepancy among the authors as to what extent she was actually involved. Cicero, Octavian and Antony, who were all key players in events, provide their own particular versions of what occurred. Later authors, such as Appian and Dio, may have been influenced by these earlier, hostile accounts of Fulvia. This is the first study in English to make use of all the available evidence, both literary and material, pertaining to Fulvia. Modern scholarship has a tendency to concentrate almost exclusively on events towards the end of Fulvia’s life, in particular the Perusine War, about which the evidence is much more abundant in later sources such as Appian and Dio. However, to do this ignores the importance of her earlier activities which, if studied more fully, can help to explain her later actions in the 40’s BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleopatra Was the Last Pharaoh of Egypt, and the Last of the Ptolemy Dynasty of Egyptian Rulers
    CLEOPATRA WAS THE LAST PHARAOH OF EGYPT, AND THE LAST OF THE PTOLEMY DYNASTY OF EGYPTIAN RULERS Cleopatra VII Background: The Ptolemaic dynasty was a Macedonian Greek royal family, which ruled the Ptolemaic Kingdom in Egypt during the Hellenistic period. Their rule lasted for 275 years, from 305 BC to 30 BC. They were the last dynasty of ancient Egypt. Ptolemy, one of the seven somatophylakes (bodyguards) who served as Alexander the Great's generals and deputies, was appointed governor of Egypt after Alexander's death in 323 BC. In 305 BC, he declared himself Ptolemy I. The Egyptians soon accepted the Ptolemy’s as the successors to the pharaohs of independent Egypt. Ptolemy's family ruled Egypt until the Roman conquest of 30 BC. The most famous member of the line was the last queen, Cleopatra VII. The timeline of the life of Cleopatra VII: Cleopatra VII was born in early 69 BC in Alexandria, Egypt. The name Cleopatra symbolises ‘glory of the father’. She was one of the five children of Ptolemy XII and Cleopatra V of Egypt. There is no record of Cleopatra's mother after her birth, leaving her father to be her primary influence. Her sibling’s names included Berenike IV, Arsinoe IV, Ptolemy XIII and Ptolemy XIV. In 58 BC, her father Ptolemy XII was expelled from Egypt and fled to Rome with Cleopatra VII. His other daughter Berenike IV seized the throne in his absence, but by 55 BC, Rome’s leaders reinstalled him, and executed Berenike IV, making Cleopatra VII the next in line for the throne.
    [Show full text]
  • Antony 83-30 BCE 337–283 BC King of Macedon
    Demetrius Poliorchetes Parallel Lives Mark Antony 83-30 BCE 337–283 BC King of Macedon • “We may, I think avail ourselves of• “…two persons who justify the the cases of those who have fallen words of Plato that great natures produce great vices as well as into indiscretions , and have, in great virtues. … Both were high stations, made themselves amorous and intemperate, conspicuous for misconduct….we warlike and munificent, shall be all the more zealous to sumptuous in their ways of living read, observe and imitate the bet- and overbearing in their ter lives if we are not left in manners… their lives a series of ignorance of the blameworthy great successes and disasters, and the bad… mighty acquisitions and tremendous losses of power…” Early Life Genealogy Brilliant Promise; Bad Choices 2 • Curio Clodius Greece • Grandfather killed by Marius • Father married into Julian family • Father Creticus died early • Mother married Cornelius Lentulus, executed by Cicero 63BCE Early Adventures, 3 pp. 273-4* Syria : Commander of Cavalry Egypt: Opportunity Knocks Antony and Hercules, 4 Antony in Rome, 49 BCE • Did Antony begin Civil Wars? *6 • Associated with Curio and Caesar • As tribune and augur • Pompey’s troops sent to Bibulus • Antony entrusted with • Reads out letters from Caesar command of troops and which Senators tried to suppress administration of Italy • Moves that both Caesar and Pompey should dismiss troops which large majority approve Best Soldier Next to Julius Caesar, 7-8 Brundisium • Defeating Pompey 48 BCE Antony as Master of the Horse and Cos, 8-11 Fights with Dolabella, tribune Punishment and Marriage, p.
    [Show full text]