DOCSLIB.ORG

Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Beckman, John Charles. 2015. Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17463966 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem A dissertation presented by John Charles Beckman to The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2015 ©2015 John Charles Beckman All Rights Reserved Dissertation Advisor: Professor John Huehnergard John Charles Beckman Toward the Meaning of the Biblical Hebrew Piel Stem Abstract The biblical Hebrew D stem (piel) seems to be inconsistent from verb to verb, both in its meaning and in its relationship to the G stem (qal). For example, the D stem has a higher valency G ‘to be holy’, D ‘to make holy’), whereas for other קדשׁ ,.than the G stem for some verbs (e.g can be glossed ‘to break’ in שׁבר־verbs, the G and D stems seem to be interchangeable (e.g., 1 both the G and D stems). The dominant explanation for this is by Waltke and O’Connor (1990), who draw upon earlier work by Jenni (1968) and Goetze (1942). They posit that the D stem is factitive/ resultative, meaning that it describes the subject causing a passive undersubject to enter a state ,which means ‘to break’ (process) in the G stem ,שׁבר־without describing the process. Thus 1 means ‘to make broken’ (resultative) in the D stem. By developing criteria to detect this distinction and by examining every occurrence of every verb in the Hebrew Bible, we found that the D stem has a process meaning far more often than a resultative meaning, contrary to Waltke and O’Connor’s hypothesis. Furthermore, their hypothesis cannot explain verbs that lack a direct object in the D stem. As an alternate explanation, Kouwenberg (1997, 2010) argued that the D stem originally expressed verbal intensity but then developed a variety of meanings, including verbal plurality and high semantic transitivity. In addition to having cross-linguistic support, this hypothesis also passed all three tests that we devised regarding its use in the Hebrew Bible: (1) The D stem adds iii an agent only to verbs that have low semantic transitivity in the G stem. (2) For verbs with roughly the same meaning in the D and G stems, the D stem is more likely in contexts that have high verbal plurality or (3) high semantic transitivity. Nevertheless, the difference in likelihood is often slight. Furthermore, the flexibility of Kouwenberg’s explanation makes it difficult to falsify, even in theory. Therefore, the level of support for Kouwenberg’s hypothesis is modest. iv Contents Abstract.....................................................................................................................................iii Tables .....................................................................................................................................viii Figures........................................................................................................................................x Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................xi Glossary, Abbreviations, and Symbols ....................................................................................xii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 1.1. The Problem .................................................................................................................1 1.2. Prior Work on the Semitic D Stem ...............................................................................3 1.2.1. Synchronic Approaches – Intensive/Pluralic........................................................3 1.2.2. Synchronic Approaches – Factitive ......................................................................5 1.2.3. Other Synchronic Approaches..............................................................................9 1.2.4. Can Pluralic and Factitive/Causative be Combined Synchronically? ................10 1.2.5. Diachronic Approaches – Multiple D Stems Fell Together................................11 1.2.6. Diachronic Approaches – The D Stem Changed over Time...............................11 1.3. The Need for Further Work ........................................................................................15 2. Relevant Concepts from Linguistic Theory .........................................................................17 2.1. Syntactic Transitivity..................................................................................................17 2.1.1. Syntactic Transitivity Theory .............................................................................17 2.1.2. Syntactic Transitivity and the D Stem ................................................................18 2.2. Semantic Transitivity..................................................................................................21 2.2.1. Semantic Transitivity According to Hopper and Thompson ..............................23 2.2.2. Semantic Transitivity According to Tsunoda......................................................31 2.2.3. Semantic Transitivity According to Givón .........................................................34 2.2.4. Semantic Transitivity According to Kittilä.........................................................39 2.2.5. Semantic Transitivity According to Næss ..........................................................41 2.2.6. Semantic Transitivity and the D Stem ................................................................44 2.3. Semantic Categories of Verbs.....................................................................................46 2.3.1. Action vs. Alternating-Valency and Agentive vs. Patientive..............................46 2.3.2. Fientive vs. Stative .............................................................................................49 2.3.3. Active vs. Middle................................................................................................52 2.4. Verbal Plurality ...........................................................................................................55 2.4.1. Verbal Plurality Theory.......................................................................................55 2.4.2. Verbal Plurality and the D Stem .........................................................................58 v 2.5. Grammaticalization ....................................................................................................62 2.5.1. Grammaticalization Theory................................................................................62 2.5.2. Grammaticalization and the Semitic D Stem .....................................................65 2.5.3. A Cross-Linguistic Grammaticalization Path .....................................................67 2.6. Lexicalization .............................................................................................................71 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................74 3.1. Data Source.................................................................................................................74 3.2. Sampling.....................................................................................................................76 4. Causation with a Passive Undersubject?..............................................................................78 4.1. Waltke & O’Connor’s Hypothesis..............................................................................78 4.2. Criteria and Plan to Test Waltke and O’Connor’s Hypothesis ...................................80 4.3. Looking for a Passive Undersubject in Waltke and O’Connor’s Examples...............83 4.3.1. Factitive Examples .............................................................................................84 85.............................................................................................................. למד .4.3.1a 89.....................................חלה, קדשׁ, קרב, ישׁב, ילד, גדל, חסר :4.3.1b. Real Factitives 99............... קלל, אשׁר־2, טהר, צדק, כבד :4.3.1c. Psychological/Linguistic Factitives 4.3.2. Resultative Examples .......................................................................................104 105...........................שׁבר־1 ,חלק ,בתר ,פרשׂ ,פשׂק ,שׁטח :4.3.2a. Simple Resultatives 116............................................ זרה, דלה :(4.3.2b. Irreal Resultatives (Metaphorical 120.....................................שׁבר־1, בקע :(4.3.2c. Irreal Resultatives (Indirect Action 122......................................נשׁך, נשׁק :(4.3.2d. Other Resultatives (Multiple Objects 4.3.3. Denominal Examples........................................................................................125
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clark, H.H. Clark, E.V. When Nouns Surface As Verbs 1979.Pdf
    WHEN NOUNS SURFACE AS VERBS EVEV. CLARKand HERBERTH. CLARK Stanford University People readily create and understand denominal verbs they have never heard before, as in to porch a newspaper and to Houdini one's way out of a closet. The meanings are best accounted for by a theory of interpretation that specifies what the verbs mean on particular occasions of their use. Our proposal is that their use is regulated by a con- vention: in using such a verb, the speaker means to denote the kind of state, event, or process that, he has good reason to believe, the listener can readily and uniquely com- pute on this occasion, on the basis of their mutual knowledge, in such a way that the parent noun (e.g. porch or Houdini) denotes one role in the state, event, or process, and the remaining surface arguments of the denominal verb denote others of its roles. This convention accounts for the meaning and acceptability of innovative verbs in various contexts; similar conventions may be needed to account for other innovative uses of language.* One remarkable aspect of our capacity to use language is our ability to create and understand expressions we have never heard before; we will call these INNOVA- TIONS. In the right contexts, we readily understand He enfant terrible'd gracefully (said of a workshop participant), or Ruling in death of Ferrari woman (newspaper headline referring to a woman whose will stipulated that she be buried in her Ferrari), or Never ask two China trips to the same dinner party (cartoon caption referring to people who had taken trips to China)-even though we have never before heard enfant terrible used as a verb, Ferrari woman used as a compound noun, or China trips used as a shorthand expression.
    [Show full text]
  • A Construction Approach to Innovative Verbs in Japanese*
    A construction approach to innovative verbs in Japanese* NATSUKO TSUJIMURA and STUART DAVIS Abstract Innovative verbs in Japanese are formed from nouns of various sources includ- ing loanwords, Sino-Japanese nouns, mimetics, and proper names. Regardless of their different origin, these innovative denominal verbs exhibit a collection of intriguing properties, ranging from phonological, morphological, to seman- tic and pragmatic. These properties are not strictly predictable from the com- ponent parts including the nature of the parent noun and verbal morphology. Such an unpredictable nature is suggestive of a constructional analysis. The form-meaning-function complex takes a templatic representation, which ex- presses the phonological and morphological characteristics, and associated with it are semantic and pragmatic properties. These phonological, morpho- logical, semantic, and pragmatic properties combine to capture the nature of innovative denominal verbs as a construction. The analysis supports the idea of applying construction grammar to morphology along the lines of the devel- oping field of construction morphology (e.g., Booij 2005, 2007, 2009a, 2009b). We further show how insights from templatic (or prosodic) morphology (e.g., McCarthy and Prince 1986, 1990) can be conceptualized in terms of construc- tion grammar. * Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Adam Albright, Adele Goldberg, and Satoshi Ue- hara for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Aspects of the current work were presented at Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, in May 2008, at the 5th International Con- ference on Construction Grammar at the University of Texas at Austin in September 2008, at a workshop on the lexicon held at the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics, Tokyo, Japan, in March 2010, and at the 14th International Morphology Meeting held in Buda- pest, Hungary, in May 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Noun-To-Verb Conversion in English*
    Reflections on Noun-to-Verb Conversion In English* HEIKE BAESKOW Abstract English denominal verbs formed by conversion adopt complex morpho- syntactic and semantic information in a rather mysterious way. For exam- ple, the lexical item bottle is unambiguously interpreted as a referential expression in a sentence like John bought a bottle of wine, but how do we account for the event-reading of the same lexical item in a sentence like John bottled the wine? In this study it will be argued that the lexical information of converted denominal verbs is not provided by an unspecified zero-affix, but by conceptual qualia structures, i. e. by modes of explana- tion, and that these make explicit the implicit knowledge speakers of Eng- lish have about the referents of nominal bases and determine the interpreta- tion and formation of the corresponding verbs. Moreover, qualia structures yield not only the basic meanings of denominal verbs, but also allow for context-dependent interpretations, which are a result of coercion (e. g. John bottled the spectators). A mapping relation between qualia struc- tures and argument structures, the latter of which are part of the lexical representation of the denominal verbs, will be established by meaning pos- tulates. Keywords: word-formation, conversion, lexicon, qualia structures, coercion, proto-roles * I would like to thank Gisa Rauh, Thilo Tappe, Stefan Engelberg, Colin Foskett, Patrick Deegan, the participants of the linguistic colloquium held at the University of Wupper- tal and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this study. Remaining mis- takes are however my responsibility. I am particularly indebted to the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung (Cologne), whose financial support enabled me to complete the work on this study, which is part of the project on “Word-Formation and the Lexicon” supervised by Gisa Rauh.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Problems in the Translation of Converted Denominal Verbs from Nouns Denoting Animate Beings'
    M. I. BAL1EIRO FERNPNDEZ-PROBLEMS IN TilE TRANSLATION OF CONVERTED DENOMINAL VERBS SOME PROBLEMS IN THE TRANSLATION OF CONVERTED DENOMINAL VERBS FROM NOUNS DENOTING ANIMATE BEINGS'. M' ISABEL BALTEIRO FERNANDEZ U niversidad de Santiago 1. INTRODUCTION As the title indicates, this paper is primarily concerned with translation problems, those of converted denominal verbs from nouns denoting animate beings. But what do I mean by converted denominal verbs? Converted denominal verbs are those verbs which are the resut of conversion processes in which a noun has undergone a change in grammatical category (from noun to verb), no change in form being acknowledged. As Quirk et al. (1985: 1558) have defmed it, conversion is then "the derivational process whereby an item is adapted or converted to a new class without the addition of an affix". This seems to be a quite productive (and therefore important) word-formation process as far as English language is concerned. And this is so for several reasons: a) it allows the creation of new items by using words already existing in the language; b) it allows language users to effectively communicate what they have in mind; c) it allows economy of expression, coherence, and precision. In Spanish, however, this tendency to form new words from already existing ones without the addition of an affix does not seem to be so marked. Having explained the object of study, it seems necessary to explain at this point why the study of these verbs in translation is interesting: Firsdy. as we have just said, since the tendency to form converted verbs in Spanish is apparently less pronounced than in English, and, as Baker (1992: 11) argues, there is no one-to-one correspondence between orthographic words and elements of meaning within or across languages, it seems interesting to look at the ways in which these items should be translated.
    [Show full text]
  • Halkomelem Denominal Verbs' 1 Denominal Verbs
    Halkomelem denominal verbs' Donna B. Gerdts and Thomas E. Hukari Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria Halkomelem has four denominal verb prefixes: c- 'have, get, make, do', I-'ingest, partake', txW- 'buy', i- 'go to'. These prefixes attach to nominal bases to form intransitive verbs. The noun to which the prefix attaches is usually unspecified, generic, or non-individuated and can be doubled with a free­ standing nominal of more specific meaning. Syntactically, this nominal is an oblique object, parallel to patients of antipassive or applicative constructions. Denominal verb constructions are widely used, especially for denoting possession. As in the case of denominal verbs in other languages, they can be formed­ quite freely, as long as the situation allows for an interpretation. 1 Denominal verbs Some intransitive verbs in Halkomelem are composed of a noun base, such as stiqiw 'horse', 8X wimel 'store', or sqew8 'potato', together with a verbalizing prefix.2 These forms appear in a denominal verb construction, where the derived form serves as an intransitive verb.3 I We would like to express our appreciation to the speakers of Island Halkomelem who have provide data for this paper, especially Arnold Guerin, Ruby Peter, and Theresa Thome. We appreciate editorial assistance from Kaoru Kiyosawa, Todd Peterson, and Charles Ulrich. Thanks to audiences at BLS, CLA, and WSCLA for comments on earlier versions of this paper. Funding for our research comes from a Jacobs Fund Grant and SSHRC Standard Research Grants #410-2001-1335 and #410-96-1247. 2 The nominal prefix s- disappears after c- and /- but not after tx w_ and i-.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Study of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Diglossic Speech in Cairene Arabic
    CORPUS STUDY OF TENSE, ASPECT, AND MODALITY IN DIGLOSSIC SPEECH IN CAIRENE ARABIC BY OLA AHMED MOSHREF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Elabbas Benmamoun, Chair Professor Eyamba Bokamba Professor Rakesh M. Bhatt Assistant Professor Marina Terkourafi ABSTRACT Morpho-syntactic features of Modern Standard Arabic mix intricately with those of Egyptian Colloquial Arabic in ordinary speech. I study the lexical, phonological and syntactic features of verb phrase morphemes and constituents in different tenses, aspects, moods. A corpus of over 3000 phrases was collected from religious, political/economic and sports interviews on four Egyptian satellite TV channels. The computational analysis of the data shows that systematic and content morphemes from both varieties of Arabic combine in principled ways. Syntactic considerations play a critical role with regard to the frequency and direction of code-switching between the negative marker, subject, or complement on one hand and the verb on the other. Morph-syntactic constraints regulate different types of discourse but more formal topics may exhibit more mixing between Colloquial aspect or future markers and Standard verbs. ii To the One Arab Dream that will come true inshaa’ Allah! عربية أنا.. أميت دمها خري الدماء.. كما يقول أيب الشاعر العراقي: بدر شاكر السياب Arab I am.. My nation’s blood is the finest.. As my father says Iraqi Poet: Badr Shaker Elsayyab iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’m sincerely thankful to my advisor Prof. Elabbas Benmamoun, who during the six years of my study at UIUC was always kind, caring and supportive on the personal and academic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic Verbs Made Easy with Effort
    Arabic online for English Speakers Basic Arabic أسس by practice العربـيـةبالتطبيق Arabic Verbs Made Easy with Effort Ghalib Al-Hakkak Singular Dual Plural Past Present Past Present Past Present نـ ـــــــ ـــــــ نا نـ ـــــــ ـــــــ نا أ ـــــــ ـــــــت تـ ـــــــ ون ـــــــ تم تـ ـــــــ ان ـــــــ تـام تـ ـــــــ ـــــــت تـ ـــــــ ن ـــــــ تـن تـ ـــــــ ان ـــــــ تـام تـ ـــــــ يـن ـــــــت يـ ـــــــ ون ـــــــ وا يـ ـــــــ ان ـــــــ ا يـ ـــــــ ـــــــَ يـ ـــــــ ن ـــــــ ن تـ ـــــــ ان ـــــــ تا تـ ـــــــ ـــــــت Singular Dual Plural مجزوم منصوب مرفوع مجزوم منصوب مرفوع مجزوم منصوب مرفوع Same spelling Same spelling نكتب Same spelling Same spelling نكتب Same spelling Same spelling أكتب تكتبوا تكتبوا تكتبون تكتبا تكتبا تكتبان Same spelling Same spelling تكتب Same spelling Same spelling تكتبـن تكتبا تكتبا تكتبان تكتبي تكتبي تكتبيـن يكتبوا يكتبوا يكتبون يكتبا يكتبا يكتبان Same spelling Same spelling يكتب Same spelling Same spelling يكتبـن تكتبا تكتبا تكتبان Same spelling Same spelling تكتب Partial - for personnal use Arabic online for English Speakers http://www.al-hakkak.fr Basic Arabic أسس by practice العربـيـةبالتطبيق Arabic Verbs Made Easy with Effort Version 1.4 Tables, exercises, corrections and index Textbook with online recordings Ghalib Al-Hakkak © Ghalib Al-Hakkak, Self published author - France ( [email protected] ) 1 Partial - for personnal use © Ghalib Al-Hakkak, August 2016 ISBN-13: 978-1536813913 / ISBN-10: 1536813915 Author : Ghalib AL-HAKKAK, Marmagne 71710, Burgandy, France Publisher : Ghalib AL-HAKKAK, Self published author (auteur auto-édité) Printed by and distributed through : Amazon Website : www.al-hakkak.fr Email : [email protected] 2 Partial - for personnal use Introduction It is important for an English speaker to choose the most suitable way to learn Arabic verbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflectional Morphology in Arabic and English: a Contrastive Study
    International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 5, No. 2; 2015 ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Inflectional Morphology in Arabic and English: A Contrastive Study Muayad Abdul-Halim Ahmad Shamsan1,2 & Abdul-majeed Attayib3 1 College of Science and Arts, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia 2 Faculty of Arts, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan 3 English Language Centre, Umm AlQura University, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Muayad Abdul-Halim Ahmad Shamsan, M. A Lecturer, College of Science and Arts, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 14, 2015 Accepted: February 12, 2015 Online Published: March 29, 2015 doi:10.5539/ijel.v5n2p139 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n2p139 Abstract This paper investigates Arabic and English inflectional morphology with a view to identifying the similarities and differences between them. The differences between the two languages might be the main reason for making errors by Arab EFL learners. Predicting the sources of such errors might help both teachers and learners to overcome these problems. By identifying the morphological differences between the two languages, teachers will determine how and what to teach, on the one hand, and students will know how and what to focus on when learning the target language, on the other. Keywords: inflectional morphology, modern standard Arabic, contrastive analysis 1. Introduction 1.1 Inflectional Morphology Inflectional affixes are those which are affixed to words to indicate grammatical function. Spencer, (1991, p. 21) points out “Inflectional operations leave untouched the syntactic category of the base, but they too add extra elements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lexical Semantics of the Arabic Verb OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, Spi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, SPi The Lexical Semantics of the Arabic Verb OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, SPi The Lexical Semantics of the Arabic Verb PETER JOHN GLANVILLE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/2/2018, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, , United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Peter John Glanville The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in Impression: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press Madison Avenue, New York, NY , United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: ISBN –––– (hbk.) –––– (pbk.) Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Arabic and English Verb Systems Using the Qur’An Arabic Corpus
    A Comparative Analysis of The Arabic and English Verb Systems Using the Qur’an Arabic Corpus A corpus-based study Jawharah Saeed Alasmari Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Languages May, 2020 I The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Jawharah Alasmari to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2020 The University of Leeds and Jawharah Saeed Alasmari II Publication Chapters two, three, and five of this thesis are based on the following jointly-authored publications. The candidate is the principal author of all original contributions presented in these papers, the co-authors acted in an advisory capacity, providing feedback, general guidance and comments. Alasmari, J., Watson, J. C. E., and Atwell E. (2018). A Contrastive Study of the Arabic and English Verb Tense and Aspect A Corpus-Based Approach. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), pp. 1604-1615. Alasmari, J., Watson J. C.E., and Atwell, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of verb tense and aspect in Arabic and English using Google Translate. International Journal on Islamic Applications in Computer Science and Technology, 5(3), pp. 9-14.
    [Show full text]
  • English for Practical Purposes 9
    ENGLISH FOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES 9 CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction of English Grammar Chapter 2: Sentence Chapter 3: Noun Chapter 4: Verb Chapter 5: Pronoun Chapter 6: Adjective Chapter 7: Adverb Chapter 8: Preposition Chapter 9: Conjunction Chapter 10: Punctuation Chapter 11: Tenses Chapter 12: Voice Chapter 1 Introduction to English grammar English grammar is the body of rules that describe the structure of expressions in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses and sentences. There are historical, social, and regional variations of English. Divergences from the grammardescribed here occur in some dialects of English. This article describes a generalized present-dayStandard English, the form of speech found in types of public discourse including broadcasting,education, entertainment, government, and news reporting, including both formal and informal speech. There are certain differences in grammar between the standard forms of British English, American English and Australian English, although these are inconspicuous compared with the lexical andpronunciation differences. Word classes and phrases There are eight word classes, or parts of speech, that are distinguished in English: nouns, determiners, pronouns, verbs, adjectives,adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions. (Determiners, traditionally classified along with adjectives, have not always been regarded as a separate part of speech.) Interjections are another word class, but these are not described here as they do not form part of theclause and sentence structure of the language. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs form open classes – word classes that readily accept new members, such as the nouncelebutante (a celebrity who frequents the fashion circles), similar relatively new words. The others are regarded as closed classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspect-Marking Basic Verbs in Arabic Dana Abdulrahim University of Alberta
    Polyfunctionality: Basic Verbs Monday 24 June / 16:30-16:55 / CCIS L1-140 Aspect-marking Basic Verbs in Arabic Dana Abdulrahim University of Alberta Cognitive approaches to language assert that our earliest, primary bodily experiences with the world play a very crucial role in shaping linguistic structures (Lakoff, 1987). Basic Verbs, or lexical items encoding basic bodily events and states, such as COME, GO, SIT, STAND, LIE, EAT, DRINK, TAKE, GIVE, etc. (Newman, 2004), show a proliferation of uses across languages ranging from polysemous and idiomatic uses to patterns of grammaticalization and collocation. Cross-linguistically, verbs denoting GO, for instance, can assume numerous grammatical functions such as marking future tense, habitual and progressive aspects, purpose and change-of-state, etc. (Heine and Kuteva, 2002). A great deal of research has been dedicated to the investigation of the properties as well as uses of Basic Verbs in several languages, such as GO and COME (e.g. Fillmore, 1966; Radden, 1996; to name but a few), EAT and DRINK (Newman and Rice, 2006), SIT, STAND, and LIE (Newman and Rice, 2004), and GIVE (e.g. Newman, 1996). While the existing body of cross-linguistic research on Basic Verbs is growing, there is relatively little research that has been done on the variations in functions and behavior of Basic Verbs across standard and spoken varieties of Arabic. This paper will discuss the lexico-syntactic properties of certain Basic Verbs in Arabic – more specifically, aspect-marking Basic Verbs – in standard and some non-standard varieties of Arabic. An online MSA corpus (www.arabicorpus.byu.edu) and a spoken corpus constructed by the author will be the main source for contextualized verb uses.
    [Show full text]