DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2019 European Parliament Elections in the Baltic States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 2019 European Parliament Elections in the Baltic States ANALYSIS Riga The 2019 European Parliament elections in the Baltic states DR DAUNIS AUERS, UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA May 2019 The three Baltic states showed a mixed profi le in the European Parliament elections. While Estonia and Lithuania were largely occupied with domestic events, Latvia expe- rienced a long, high-profi le campaign. At the same time all three countries showed that the European and the national level are closely interlinked and do interplay with each other. Due to a preferential voting logic in a proportional representation system all estab- lished political parties put forward lists containing candidates with either extensive political experience, current MEPs or high-profi le personalities. In this way they bene- fi ted from a pronounced experience/competence versus fresh-faces/innovation di- vide. The political cleavages present in many older Western European democracies were largely absent. The campaigning focused on economy, immigration and security is- sues as well as relations with Russia. With this the mainstream parties were the big- gest winners in the region, with the centrist European Peoples Party (EPP), the Social- ists and Democrats (S&D) and The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) winning 17 of the 25 seats in the region. The Greens/European Free Alliance (G/EFA) and the European Conservatives and reformists (ECR) each won three seats. Like in prior EP-elections rightwing populist and Eurosceptic parties did not manage to achieve a decisive electoral turnout but the issue may potentially grow with more vigour in the years to come. DAUNIS AUERS | THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES Riga Content Introduction . 3 1. Parties and candidates . 4 2. Issues and Policies . 9 3. Euroscepticism and National Populism . 10 4. Results and impact . 12 2 DAUNIS AUERS | THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES Riga Introduction politicians and the public were more concerned with debating who would follow President Da- The 25-26 May 2019 European Parliament elec- lia Grybauskaitė, who had held the office for a tions were the fourth in the Baltic states since ac- decade, than debating Lithuania’s place in the cession to the European Union fi fteen years ago. European Parliament. Estonia was similarly still As was the case in the European Union (EU) as dealing with the political fallout from an unex- a whole, turnout increased in all three states, al- pected and controversial new three-party coali- though only Lithuania saw a turnout above the EU tion government that saw the national populist average and this was largely down to the Europe- Conservative People’s Party of Estonia (EKRE) an poll coinciding with the second round of voting enter government office for the first time. Only on the next Lithuanian president. in Latvia did the European Parliament election receive a similar depth of coverage and public European Parliament elections are broadly un- interest to previous years. derstood as “second order elections” in nation- al electoral cycles. Voters use the election as The elections were framed by a generally positive a forum to express their opinions on national economic outlook. In Spring 2019 unemployment parties, politicians and policy issues rather than in the Baltic states was low (7.6% in Latvia, 5.8% to vote on European-level issues or policy alter- in Lithuania and just 4.2% in Estonia1) and annual natives. GDP was forecast to grow briskly at rates of 2.8% in Estonia, 3.1% in Latvia and 2.7% in Lithuania This was certainly the case with the May 2019 following even higher rates of growth in 2018.2 European Parliament elections in the Baltic This economic optimism was also refl ected in states, which followed Estonia’s March 2019 generally positive attitudes to the EU. Eurostat parliamentary vote as well as Lithuania’s munic- data revealed that Lithuania and Estonia were the ipal elections in March and the first and second second and fourth most positive states in seeing round of presidential voting in May (with the EU membership as a “good thing” while all three second round taking place on the same day as states were above the EU27 average in believing the European Parliament election). While having the presidential vote coincided with the Euro- pean Parliament elections allowed Lithuania to 1. Eurostat. 2019. Unemployment rates, seasonally adjusted, March 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/ avoid the ignominy of having a catastrophically Unemployment_statistics low turnout – as was the case in 2009 when just 2. GDP in 2018 grew by 3.9% in Estonia, 4.8% in Latvia and 3.4% in 21% of the electorate voted which was second Lithuania. European Commission. May 2019. European Economic Forecast Spring 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/ lowest in the EU – it did mean that journalists, economy-fi nance/ip102_en.pdf Table 1. European Parliament electoral rules in the Baltic States Estonia Latvia Lithuania Minimum age of candidates 21 21 21 Electoral threshold (%) None 5% 5% Election day Sunday 26 May Saturday 25 May Sunday 26 May Number of MEPs (after Brexit) 6 (7) 8 (8) 11 (11) Voting system Preferential PR Preferential PR Preferential PR Formula for seat allocation D’Hondt Sainte-Laguë Hare quota Source: Central Election Committees in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 3 DAUNIS AUERS | THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES Riga Table 2. Attitudes to the European Union. Baltic states and EU27 average Estonia Latvia Lithuania EU27 Generally speaking, do you think that (our country’s) membership of the EU is a good thing? 74% 54% 71% 61% (% agree) Taking everything into account, would you say that (our country) has on balance benefi tted from 88% 72% 90% 68% being a member of the EU (% agree) Would you personally like to see the European Parliament play a more important or less 34% 56% 66% 54% important role? (% more important) My voice counts in the EU. (% agree) 22% 27% 32% 51% Our country’s voice counts in the EU (% agree) 58% 50% 57% 63% Source: Eurobarometer 91.1 of the European Parliament (2019) that their countries had benefi tted from EU mem- tered in Estonia for the 2019 election, including bership (see Table 2). Indeed, more than half of Raimond Kaljulaid, President Kersti Kaljulaid’s all Latvians and Lithuanians favoured giving the brother. He had left the Estonian Centre Party (EK) European parliament a greater role. While all just weeks after being elected to parliament in three states are below the EU27 average in terms protest at the new government coalition formed of agreeing that their personal or national voices with the national populist Estonian Conservative count in the EU, this may well refl ect the reality People’s Party (EKRE). In 2015 Lithuania created of being small states rather than being a sign of a form of public election committee that allows Euroscepticism. Indeed, only one out of the twen- groups of citizens to run for offi ce without hav- ty-fi ve European Parliament seats contested in ing to join or create new political parties. They do, the Baltic states in 2019 was won by an openly however, need to collect the signatures of 10,000 Eurosceptic party. citizens in order to run. Five such public election committees ran for the European Parliament, in- cluding one led by the impeached ex-president 1. Parties and candidates and serving MEP, Rolandas Paksas and another named the “Train of Aušra Maldeikienė”, formed A total of 41 parties, alliances, electoral commit- by an independent deputy in the Lithuanian par- tees and individual candidates were registered liament. to compete in the election (see Table 3). Political parties have the right to submit candidate lists in European elections in the region have tended to all three Baltic states. Additionally, in Latvia and be quite personalised with the character of can- Lithuania parties can also form electoral allianc- didates being a key campaigning element. There es and present joint lists of candidates. Estoni- are three major reasons for this. First, all three an electoral law allows individual candidates to Baltic states utilise preferential voting proportion- stand for election. Indeed, in both 2009 and 2014 al representation systems in single national con- Indrek Tarand, a radio and television personality, stituencies in European Parliament elections. This was elected to the European Parliament with a open-list system gives voters the opportunity to personal mandate. In the 2019 election Tarand rank candidates according to their own personal stood on the Estonian Social Democratic Party’s preference and tends to encourage active individ- (SDE) list. Five individual candidates were regis- ual campaigning. Second, a MEP’s remuneration 4 DAUNIS AUERS | THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES Riga Table 3. Political parties, alliances, election committee and individual candidates standing for election to the European Parliament in the Baltic states in 2019 Estonia Latvia Lithuania Homeland Union – Lithuanian Estonian Reform Party (ERP) New Unity (JV) Social Democrats (TS-LKD) Social Democratic Party of Estonian Centre Party (EK) National Alliance (NA) Lithuania (LSDP) Social Democratic party Liberals Movement of the Isamaa Harmony (SDPS) Republic of Lithuania (LRLS) Estonian Social Democratic Green/Farmers Union (ZZS) Order and Justice (TT) Party (SDE) Estonian Conservative People’s Latvia’s Russian Union (LKS) Labour party (DP) Party (EKRE) Lithuanian Peasant and Green Estonian Green Party
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Research Agreement a Social Agreement to Ensure the Further Development of Estonian Research and Innovation
    Estonian Research Agreement A social agreement to ensure the further development of Estonian research and innovation Sharing the common belief that research, development and innovation are strategically important for the well-being of the Estonian people and sustainability of society, the parties to this agreement confirm the need to guarantee the performance of the objectives agreed upon in the Estonian Research and Development and Innovation Strategy 2014–2020 “Knowledge-Based Estonia” and undertake to commit to the achievement of these objectives. For this purpose, they agree upon the following: 1. the undersigned political parties, represented by their Chairpersons, are in favour of increasing the public funding of research, development and innovation to 1% of the gross domestic product and maintaining it at least on the same level in the future. To this end, the parties agree that it will be specified in the 2019 state budget strategy that the target level is to be reached within three years with the addition of equal funding amounts; 2. Estonian research institutions, represented by the President of the Board of Universities Estonia, an association uniting Estonian public universities, affirm that research institutions will establish the institutional arrangements required for conducting and providing further incentive for performing high quality research and cooperation between researchers and entrepreneurs; 3. Estonian researchers, represented by the President of the Estonian Academy of Sciences and the President of the Estonian Young Academy of Sciences, affirm that Estonian researchers will do their best to ensure that the resources at their disposal are used for research and development in a way that guarantees a balance between basic and applied research, with the primary focus on developing fields aimed at the advancement of the Estonian economy and society; 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia by Vello Pettai and Martin Mölder
    Estonia by Vello Pettai and Martin Mölder Capital: Tallinn Population: 1.3 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$19,120 Source: The data above was provided by The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Electoral Process 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 Civil Society 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Governance* 2.25 2.25 2.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Corruption 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.25 Democracy Score 2.00 2.00 1.92 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.93 1.93 1.96 1.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • CIO VIEW Macro Perspectives
    CIO VIEW Macro Perspectives March 12, 2019 ANOTHER POPULIST SHOCK IN EUROPE? Probably not. But elections in May to the European Parliament may well confirm wide-spread discon- tent with the status quo. Financial markets are fearful of a new wave of populist anger, cresting at May's elections to the European Parliament. As far as the European Parliament is concerned, such fears appear highly unlikely to prove justified. There might well be some populist surprises, not yet apparent in the polling. It is far Johannes Müller less clear that such surprises will necessarily strengthen the Eurosceptic camp, Head of Macro Research NUTSHELL IN A however broadly defined. These days, hardly a discussion about markets goes by coming nominations, notably to the European Central Bank without somebody bringing up political risks. Italy's budget (ECB).2 In most policy areas, the EP's influence is now on and Brexit are perennial topics, of course. But at least in our an equal footing with the European Council (consisting of experience, concerns about elections to the European Par- each member state's head of government). To adopt or liament (EP) are also on the rise. We have only just started amend European Union (EU) legislation, the final wording our own analysis, using similar approaches to those we generally has to be approved by both the EP and the Coun- developed to analyze and attempt to predict national elec- cil. (Legislation can only be proposed by the European tion outcomes in recent years. Our initial results suggest Commission.)3 several reasons to feel reassured.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf
    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release 15-01-2019 - 18:28 Reference No: 20190109IPR23015
    Press release 15-01-2019 - 18:28 Reference No: 20190109IPR23015 Romanian Presidency of the Council: debate with Prime Minister Viorica Dăncilă Competitiveness, digitization, protection and the safety of citizens will be the focus of the Romanian presidency of the Council, said Prime Minister Dăncilă. During the next six months, the Romanian presidency will aim for better political and economic cohesion between member states and will commit to work towards reducing development gaps between regions, supporting economic growth and digitization, especially for European industry. Coherent management of migration flows, strengthening the EU’s external borders and a better protection of citizens in virtual space will also be work priorities in the first semester of 2019. Setting up and even extending the mandate of the European Prosecutor’s Office to include terrorist offenses and better cooperation between countries of origin and transit countries on migration issues will also be on the agenda. The Prime Minister underlined the Romanian government’s commitment to move forward on EU enlargement matters, with particular attention paid to the Western Balkans and a focus on common European values. MEPs of all political groups underlined that they stood ready to work hand in hand with the presidency to move forward on European legislative matters in priority areas, pointing out that the Romanian government must do more to promote European values by being more politically stable and consistent. To watch videos of speakers’ statements, click on the
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Latvia: Status Quo for Minorities Remains?
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 9, No 1, 2010, 72-89 Original received: 08.12.2010 Copyright © ECMI 2010 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2010/Latvia_Elections.pdf Elections in Latvia: status quo for minorities remains? Tatyana Bogushevitch and Aleksejs Dimitrovs * This article comments on the results of the recent parliamentary elections in Latvia and related implications for ethnic minorities. The authors examine in detail the pre-election programs, follow the developments before and after the elections, and come to the conclusion that the existing situation in the field of ethnic policy will remain in place for some time. Parliamentary elections took place in Latvia on 2 October 2010. Due to economic crisis and harsh austerity measures including severe public spending cuts, ethnic policy issues have not been very high on the agenda in the pre-election and post- election period, unlike in previous years. Nevertheless, in the country where more than 40% of the population are persons belonging to minorities 1, minority issues are inevitably a part of the national debate. After the elections, five alliances are represented in the Saeima (Parliament): centre-right ‘Unity’ (33 seats out of 100), social democratic ‘Concord Centre’ (29 seats), centre-right Union of Greens and Farmers (22 seats), right-wing nationalistic ‘All for Latvia’ – ‘For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK’ (8 seats) and centrist ‘For a Good Latvia’ (8 seats). Out of the 100 members 15 (13 ethnic Russians, 1 Karelian * Dr Tatyana Bogushevitch is a graduate of the University of Latvia, Riga.
    [Show full text]