DOCSLIB.ORG

DTE-SE FY09 Annual Report Title Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DTE-SE FY09 Annual Report Title Page Department of Defense Developmental Test and Evaluation and Systems Engineering FY 2011 Annual Report. Washington, DC: DASD(DT&E) and DASD(SE), 2012. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation 3030 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-3030 [email protected] www.acq.osd.mil/dte Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 3030 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-3030 [email protected] www.acq.osd.mil/se Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Developmental Test and Evaluation ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Systems Engineering ....................................................................................................................... 2 2 DASD(DT&E) ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................5 2.1 Policy and Guidance Summary ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Measurable Performance Criteria .................................................................................................... 5 2.3 T&E Acquisition Workforce Development ..................................................................................... 7 2.4 Program Engagement ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 DASD(DT&E) Focus Areas ............................................................................................................ 8 3 DASD(DT&E) COMPONENT ASSESSMENTS ......................................................................... 21 3.1 Summary of Component Assessments ........................................................................................... 21 3.2 DASD(DT&E) Assessment of the Components’ Reports ............................................................. 22 3.3 T&E Workforce ............................................................................................................................. 25 4 DASD(DT&E) PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................. 31 4.1 DASD(DT&E) Assessments of Army Programs ........................................................................... 33 4.2 DASD(DT&E) Assessments of Navy Programs ........................................................................... 53 4.3 DASD(DT&E) Assessments of Air Force Programs ..................................................................... 77 4.4 DASD(DT&E) Assessments of DoD Programs ............................................................................ 91 5 DASD(SE) ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................... 105 5.1 Policy and Guidance ............................................................................................................... 105 5.2 Program Engagement and Oversight ........................................................................................... 108 5.3 Workforce .................................................................................................................................... 118 6 DASD(SE) ASSESSMENTS OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS .................................................... 123 6.1 Assessment Overview .................................................................................................................. 123 6.2 Systems Engineering .................................................................................................................... 123 6.3 Development Planning and Early Systems Engineering ............................................................. 125 6.4 Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) ....................................................................................... 127 6.5 Workforce Initiatives .................................................................................................................. 128 6.6 Additional Authorities or Resources Needed ............................................................................... 129 6.7 Impact of FY 2012 Budget on Systems Engineering Workforce ................................................ 129 7 DASD(SE) PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ...................................................................................131 7.1 DASD(SE) Assessments of Army Programs ............................................................................... 133 7.2 DASD(SE) Assessments of Navy Programs ................................................................................ 149 7.3 DASD(SE) Assessments of Air Force Programs ......................................................................... 179 7.4 DASD(SE) Assessments of DoD Programs ................................................................................. 205 DoD DT&E and SE FY 2011 Annual Report iii CONTENTS APPENDIX A. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SELF-ASSESSMENT ........... 225 APPENDIX B. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SELF-ASSESSMENT ............ 241 APPENDIX C. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SELF-ASSESSMENT .... 269 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................... 285 Figures Figure 3-1. FY 2011 T&E Personnel Breakdown ...................................................................................... 26 Figure 3-2. Comparison of T&E Workforce Data FY 2009 – FY 2011 .................................................... 27 Figure 5-1. FY 2011 Development Planning Program Support ............................................................... 109 Figure 5-2. FY 2011 DASD(SE) Technical Reviews and Assessments by Domain and Military Department .............................................................................................................. 112 Tables Table 2-1. DASD(DT&E) AOTR Recommendations .............................................................................. 15 Table 2-2. MIDS JTRS (FY 2010) ........................................................................................................... 15 Table 2-3. Global Hawk Block 20-30 (FY 2010) ..................................................................................... 16 Table 2-4. Stryker NBCRV (FY 2010) ..................................................................................................... 17 Table 2-5. JASSM-ER (FY 2011) ............................................................................................................ 17 Table 2-6. SM-6 (FY 2011) ...................................................................................................................... 18 Table 2-7. JTRS HMS Rifleman Radio (FY 2012) .................................................................................. 18 Table 2-8. C-130 AMP (FY 2012) ............................................................................................................ 19 Table 3-1. T&E Acquisition Workforce Certification Levels .................................................................. 22 Table 3-2. T&E Acquisition Workforce Comparison, FY 2010 and FY 2011 ......................................... 28 Table 3-3. T&E Key Leadership Positions ............................................................................................... 28 Table 5-1. FY 2011 SEP Review and Approval Activity Summary ...................................................... 110 Table 5-2. FY 2011 DASD(SE) Technical Reviews and Assessment Summary ................................... 111 Table 5-3. FY 2011 DASD(SE) Program List and Activity Details ....................................................... 113 Table 5-4. Systems Engineering Workforce Positions in the DoD Reported by Military Department SEs and DASD(SE) ............................................................................................................... 121 iv DoD DT&E and SE FY 2011 Annual Report Index to Program Assessments DASD(DT&E) PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................31 DASD(DT&E) Assessments of Army Programs ........................................................................................ 33 Apache Block III (AB3) ....................................................................................................................... 34 Global Combat Support System–Army (GCSS-A) .............................................................................. 36 Increment 1 Early–Infantry Brigade Combat Team (E-IBCT)............................................................. 37 Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System (JLENS) ......................... 39 M109 Family of Vehicles, Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) .................................................... 40 MQ-1C Increment 1 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Gray Eagle .................................................. 42 Nett Warrior (NW) ............................................................................................................................... 44 PATRIOT ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Stryker Family of Vehicles – Double-V Hull (DVH) .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fy15 Table of Contents Fy16 Table of Contents
    FY15FY16 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOT&E Activity and Oversight FY16 Activity Summary 1 Program Oversight 7 Problem Discovery Affecting OT&E 13 DOD Programs Major Automated Information System (MAIS) Best Practices 23 Defense Agencies Initiative (DAI) 29 Defensive Medical Information Exchange (DMIX) 33 Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S) 37 Department of Defense (DOD) Teleport 41 DOD Healthcare Management System Modernization (DHMSM) 43 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter 47 Global Command and Control System – Joint (GCCS-J) 107 Joint Information Environment (JIE) 111 Joint Warning and Reporting Network (JWARN) 115 Key Management Infrastructure (KMI) Increment 2 117 Next Generation Diagnostic System (NGDS) Increment 1 121 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Increment 2 123 Theater Medical Information Program – Joint (TMIP-J) 127 Army Programs Army Network Modernization 131 Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) 135 Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Program (SEP) Main Battle Tank (MBT) 139 AH-64E Apache 141 Army Integrated Air & Missile Defense (IAMD) 143 Chemical Demilitarization Program – Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives (CHEM DEMIL-ACWA) 145 Command Web 147 Distributed Common Ground System – Army (DCGS-A) 149 HELLFIRE Romeo and Longbow 151 Javelin Close Combat Missile System – Medium 153 Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles (FoV) 155 Joint Tactical Networks (JTN) Joint Enterprise Network Manager (JENM) 157 Logistics Modernization Program (LMP) 161 M109A7 Family of Vehicles (FoV) Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) 165
    [Show full text]
  • Management Perspectives Pertaining to Root Cause Analyses of Nunn-Mccurdy Breaches
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. MARK V. A RENA, IRV BLICKSTEIN, ABBY DOLL, JEFFREY A. DREZNER, JAMES G. KALLIMANI, JENNIFER KAVANAGH, DANIEL F.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Defense Budget
    Preface The Overview Book has been published as part of the President’s Annual Defense Budget for the past few years. From FY 1969 to FY 2005, OSD published the “Annual Defense Report” (ADR) to meet 10 USC section 113 requirements. Subsequently, the Overview began to fill this role. The Overview is one part of an extensive set of materials that constitute the presentation and justification of the President’s Budget for FY 2020. This document and all other publications for this and previous DoD budgets are available from the public web site of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller): http://comptroller.defense.gov. The Press Release and Budget Briefing, often referred to as the “Budget Rollout,” and the Program Acquisition Costs by Weapons System book, which includes summary details on major DoD acquisition programs (i.e., aircraft, ground forces programs, shipbuilding, space systems, etc.) are especially relevant. The website for Performance Improvement tables and charts is http://dcmo.defense.gov/Publications/AnnualPerformancePlanandPerformanceReport.aspx. Other background information can be accessed at www.defense.gov. The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $27,000 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses and $14,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019Mar05 RefID: E-DE33FD3 i This Page Intentionally Left Blank. ii Overview – FY 2020 Defense Budget Table of Contents 1. FY 2020 Budget Summary – A Strategy Driven Budget 1-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2018 National Defense Strategy ......................................................................................... 1-2 FY 2020 Budget Request Overview .................................................................................... 1-3 Building a More Lethal Force .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Research: Creating Synergy for Informed Change
    SYM-AM-16-019 Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Wednesday Sessions Volume I Acquisition Research: Creating Synergy for Informed Change May 4–5, 2016 Published April 30, 2016 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943. Acquisition Research Program Graduate School of Business & Public Policy Naval Postgraduate School The research presented in this report was supported by the Acquisition Research Program of the Graduate School of Business & Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School. To request defense acquisition research, to become a research sponsor, or to print additional copies of reports, please contact any of the staff listed on the Acquisition Research Program website (www.acquisitionresearch.net). Acquisition Research Program Graduate School of Business & Public Policy Naval Postgraduate School Table of Contents Keynote: The Honorable Sean Stackley, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, & Acquisition ............................................................... vii Plenary Panel: Weapon Acquisition Program Outcomes and Efforts to Reform DoD’s Acquisition Process ..................................................................................... 1 Panel 2. Applications of Real Options Analysis in Defense Acquisition ............ 3 Acquiring Technical Data With Renewable Real Options ....................................... 5 Incorporation of Outcome-Based Contract Requirements in a Real Options
    [Show full text]
  • Radar and Phased-Arrays: Advances, Breakthroughs and Future
    RADAR AND PHASED-ARRAYS: ADVANCES, BREAKTHROUGHS AND FUTURE Dr. Eli Brookner Raytheon Company (retired); 282 Marrett Rd., Lexington, MA 02421 [email protected], Tel and Fax: +1-781-862-7014 Radar-2018, August, 27-30, 2018, Brisbane, Australia Keywords: Radar, AESA, phased arrays, metamaterial, radar for horizon search; adaptive digital beam forming; MIMO, Extreme MMIC, PATRIOT, JLENS, AMDR, SPY-3, handles 30 times more targets and has more than 30 times graphene, car radar, signal processing, Moore’s law. FPGA, Dig- sensitivity of SPY-1D(V).; uses GaN which is 34% less ital Beam Forming, carbon nanotubes, transistors, synaptic tran- costly than GaAs; GaN has 108 hour MTBF; antenna com- sistors, cloaking, stealth, COSMOS, ACT, DAHI. posed of 2x2x2 ft3 radar module assembly (RMA) building blocks; 4 line replaceable units (LRU) per RMA; each LRU Abstract: replaced in less than 6 minutes; fully programmable, 37 Moore’s Law is slowing down but still has a way to go. Potential RMAs produce a system that is equivalent to the SPY- further major advances of Moore’s Law via: Spintronics, Memris- 1D(V)+15dB, back-end radar controller built out of com- tors, Graphene, and Quantum Computing. Advances made in met- mercial off-the-shelf (COTS) x86 processors which allows amaterials include low cost electronically scanned arrays (ESAs), adapting to future threats by easy upgrading with future stealth, cloaking (invisibility), low profile VHF/UHF antennas, COTS processors eliminating obsolescence; S-band an- λ focusing < /2. PATRIOT upgraded to GaN active electronically tenna is scalable. Another development is the Zumwalt scanned arrays (AESAs) having 360o coverage without mechani- DDG-1000 stealth ship launched Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Laboratory Lands on Red Ink
    AA CoverOctFinal.qxd:AA Template 9/15/09 2:49 PM Page 1 9 AEROSPACE AMERICA JanuaryOctober 20092009 OCTOBER 2009 Mars laboratory lands on red ink Space debris: A growing challenge A conversation with Graham Love APUBLICATIONOFTHEAMERICANINSTITUTEOFAERONAUTICSANDASTRONAUTICS toc.OCT2009.qxd:AA Template 10/7/09 11:23 AM Page 1 October 2009 DEPARTMENTS Page 4 EDITORIAL 3 Our future in space. INTERNATIONAL BEAT 4 Europe looks for UCAV synergies. ASIA UPDATE 8 Southeast Asia reaches toward space. Page 8 WASHINGTON WATCH 10 Page 10 Aviation and spaceflight under scrutiny. HONORS & AWARDS 14 CONVERSATIONS 16 With Graham Love. VIEW FROM HERE 18 Is human spaceflight “optional”? ENGINEERING NOTEBOOK 22 NASA coating helps keep hearts beating. Page 18 OUT OF THE PAST 44 CAREER OPPORTUNITIES 46 FEATURES MARS LABORATORY LANDS ON RED INK 24 With the Mars Science Laboratory’s launch window soon closing and important Page 24 challenges remaining, NASA has acted to safeguard the troubled program. by Frank Sietzen Jr. SPACE DEBRIS:A GROWING CHALLENGE 30 As space debris proliferates, experts say portions of near-Earth orbit could become unusable if mitigating steps are not taken soon. by Leonard David CLOUDY FORECAST FOR NPOESS 38 Working hand in hand with both manufacturers and airlines, EASA’s goal is to make flying Europe’s skies as safe as possible. by James W.Canan BULLETIN Page 30 AIAA Meeting Schedule B2 AIAA Courses and Training Program B4 AIAA News B5 Meeting Program B13 Call for Papers B22 Page 38 COVER The Mars Science Laboratory is NASA’s most complex Mars effort to date.Its large rover will be housed in an aeroshell with a heat shield.For more on this ambitious program,turn to the story beginning on page 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Anti-Access/Area Denial Measures on Space Systems: Issues and Implications for Army and Joint Forces
    The United States Army War College The United States Army War College educates and develops leaders for service at the strategic level while advancing knowledge in the global application of Landpower. The purpose of the United States Army War College is to produce graduates who are skilled critical thinkers and complex problem solvers. Concurrently, it is our duty to the U.S. Army to also act as a “think factory” for commanders and civilian leaders at the strategic level worldwide and routinely engage in discourse and debate concerning the role of ground forces in achieving national security objectives. The Strategic Studies Institute publishes national security and strategic research and analysis to influence policy debate and bridge the gap between military and academia. The Center for Strategic Leadership contributes to the education of world class senior leaders, CENTER for STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP develops expert knowledge, and provides solutions to strategic Army issues affecting the national U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE security community. The Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute provides subject matter expertise, technical review, and writing expertise to agencies that develop stability operations concepts and doctrines. The School of Strategic Landpower develops strategic leaders by providing a strong foundation of wisdom grounded in mastery of the profession of arms, and by serving as a crucible for educating future leaders in the analysis, evaluation, and refinement of professional expertise in war, strategy, operations, national security, resource management, and responsible command. The U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center acquires, conserves, and exhibits historical materials for use to support the U.S. Army, educate an international audience, and honor Soldiers—past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • VISION for PEACE Emerging Networks to Secure Land, Sea, Air, Cyber and Space
    VOLUME 42, ISSUE 1, 2017 VISION FOR PEACE Emerging Networks to Secure Land, Sea, Air, Cyber and Space PLUS Polar Pursuits and Mangudai Warrior Challenge IAPDF TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 42, ISSUE 1 features 10 Changing Climates and Polar Pursuits Indo-Asia-Pacific states take an increased interest in the Arctic and Antarctica as their governments create plans to manage climate change. 16 Seeding Food Security Emerging technologies, family farms and regional cooperation will reduce resource competition and threats to stability. 22 China’s Cloned Weapons Beijing’s use of “techno-cloning” arms its military with other countries’ technology. 28 Rebalancing With India India and U.S. relations strengthen in the face of Chinese aggression. 36 Peninsula Provocations South Korea vows to “strongly retaliate” against threats from the North. 40 Keeping the Peace in Space As the number of nations capable of launching satellites grows, so does the need for cooperation and partnership. 46 Securing the Cybersphere Collective action needed to provide legal protection for the domain. 50 Data Sharing Singapore’s Information Fusion Centre is becoming a regional hub. 54 Maritime Synergy Littoral nations use the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium to cooperate on regional seafaring challenges and to maintain secure waterways. 58 Ancient Warrior Challenge Mangudai event tests endurance, 16 teamwork of Republic of Korea, U.S. forces. departments 4 Indo-Asia-Pacific View 5 Contributors 6 Across the Region News from the Indo-Asia-Pacific. 8 Terrorist Update Indonesia attempts to retrain militants. 60 Voice Resolving conflict in a tricky environment. 62 Culture & Custom Reviving Burma’s ancient chess.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Navy – U.S. Air Force Relationships 1970-2010
    U.S. Navy – U.S. Air Force Relationships 1970-2010 Peter M. Swartz With Karin Duggan MISC D0024022.A4/1Rev June 2011 Strategic Studies is a division of CNA. This directorate conducts strategy and force assessments, analyses of security policy, regional analyses, and studies of political-military issues. CNA Strategic Studies is part of the global commu- nity of strategic studies institutes and in fact collaborates with many of them. Our strategists and military/naval operations experts have either active duty experience or have served as field ana- lysts with operating Navy and Marine Corps commands. They are skilled at anticipating the “problem after next” as well as determining measures of effectiveness to assess ongoing initiatives. A particular strength is bringing empirical methods to the evaluation of peace-time engagement and shaping activities. On the ground experience is a hallmark of our regional work. Our specialists combine in-country experience, lan- guage skills, and the use of local primary-source data to produce empirically based work. All of our analysts have advanced degrees, and virtually all have lived and worked abroad. The Strategic Studies Division’s charter is global. In particular, our analysts have proven expertise in the following areas: • Maritime strategy • Future national security environment and forces • Deterrence, WMD proliferation, missile defense, and arms control. • Insurgency and stabilization • The world’s most important navies • The full range of Asian security issues • The full range of Middle East related security issues, especially Iran and the Arabian Gulf • European security issues, especially the Mediterranean littoral • West Africa, especially the Gulf of Guinea • Latin America The Strategic Studies Division is led by Acting Director, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Developmental Test and Evaluation FY 2012 Annual Report
    Department of Defense Developmental Test and Evaluation FY 2012 Annual Report Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Developmental Test and Evaluation 3090 Defense Pentagon 5A1076 Washington, DC 20301-3090 [email protected] www.acq.osd.mil/dte-trmc Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Developmental Test and Evaluation ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 DoD Test Resource Management Center ......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Adequacy of Resources.................................................................................................................... 2 2 DASD(DT&E) ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................5 2.1 Policy and Guidance Summary ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Measurable Performance Criteria .................................................................................................... 6 2.3 T&E Acquisition Workforce Development ..................................................................................... 8 2.4 Program Engagement .................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 DASD(DT&E) Focus Areas .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Fence Program Manager
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (This section must be signed and returned to [email protected]) Individuals outside your company, including the companies listed above and other third parties, potentially including your competitors and others in your industry, may receive and/or review award submissions. All information submitted should address the program’s management, leadership, and processes in a manner that you are comfortable sharing with third parties freely and without restriction, and may not include any classified or proprietary information or materials. Do not include any materials marked Confidential or Proprietary or bearing any similar legend. All responses and other submissions, whether in whole or in part (“Submissions”), shall be deemed not to be confidential, proprietary, and/or nonpublic information of any sort for any purpose. Without limiting the foregoing, you hereby grant to Aviation Week Network, an Informa business, a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, full paid-up, worldwide license to copy, reproduce, distribute, display, publicly perform, publish, republish, post, transmit, disseminate, edit, modify, and create compilations and/or derivative works of the Submissions (or any portion or excerpt thereof) in connection with its or any of its affiliates’ business(es). Aviation Week Network agrees not to edit the Submissions in any way that materially alters their overall substantive meaning. Aviation Week Network may freely assign, license, transfer, and/or otherwise convey any or all of the rights and licenses
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Efforts to Mitigate the Risks Posed by Orbital Debris
    NASA Office of Inspector General National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Audits NASA’S EFFORTS TO MITIGATE THE RISKS POSED BY ORBITAL DEBRIS January 27, 2021 Report No. IG-21-011 Office of Inspector General To report, fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement, contact the NASA OIG Hotline at 800-424-9183 or 800-535-8134 (TDD) or visit https://oig.nasa.gov/hotline.html. You can also write to NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, D.C. 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. To suggest ideas or request future audits, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Audits at https://oig.nasa.gov/aboutAll.html. RESULTS IN BRIEF NASA’s Efforts to Mitigate the Risks Posed by Orbital Debris NASA Office of Inspector General Office of Audits January 27, 2021 IG-21-011 (A-20-002-00) WHY WE PERFORMED THIS AUDIT Orbital debris is defined as human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful purpose, such as decommissioned satellites and parts of spacecraft. This debris—also known as “space junk”—lingers above the Earth’s atmosphere for years until it decays, deorbits, explodes, or collides with another object thus creating more debris. The amount of orbital debris has increased exponentially over the last 60 years due to (1) accumulating and increasing amounts of satellites and other objects launched into space by public, civil, and private entities from around the globe and (2) intentional and accidental spacecraft explosions and collisions.
    [Show full text]