374-GLYPHS Syll 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

374-GLYPHS Syll 2013 University of Texas at Austin Spring 2013 Study Abroad in Antigua, Guatemala Ancient Maya Writing and History ANT 324L / ARH 370/ LAS 327 Astrid Runggaldier Office hours: CH Thursdays 2-4 pm or by appointment Syllabus Course Overview. This course introduces students to Maya hieroglyphic writing, and how the decipherment of texts has led to new understandings of ancient Maya culture, society and history. The class aims to provide the student with a good working knowledge of the ancient Maya script, the language(s) in which it was written, and the history and methodology underlying the process of decipherment. No previous knowledge of Maya glyphs is necessary, but I do assume at least a basic awareness of Maya archaeology and its key points. Maya glyphs might well be considered the single most complex writing system ever devised. With its built-in capacity for exhibiting scribal artistry and idiosyncrasy, the Maya writing system’s inherent complexity has no equal among ancient or modern scripts. We will devote much time in the first half of the course describing the basic orthographic rules of the script, and from there slowly enter into more linguistically and historically oriented topics. Each meeting will be devoted to a particular theme or topic (Mayan Linguistics, Calendars, Politics, etc.). We will approach Maya writing through numerous case studies, drawn from texts found throughout the Maya area, and these will naturally progress during the term from the very simple to the moderately complex. In addition to the remarkable ruins at Copan, Honduras, we will focus on Maya writing during in-class study, at Guatemala’s Museo Nacional de Antropología e Historia, and we will have special opportunities to learn about and directly examine Maya art and writing, sometimes in original context. Lectures. Lectures will meet four days of the week (Monday through Thursday 9:00-10:30) and will be heavy on visuals and class exercises, which will form the core intellectual content of the class. Regular attendance is required and assumed. Participation is expected in all classes. Some lectures will include films: these are mandatory and constitute part of the course content. Field Trips This class will involve two field excursions during the second half of the semester, in addition to the excursions for Sacred Landscapes (exact dates to be confirmed). There will be (1) a visit to the Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología; and (2) a visit to the Museo Ixchel del Traje Indígena, both in Guatemala City. Readings. Readings are from two required texts: Reading the Maya Glyphs, by Michael D. Coe and Mark Van Stone. 2nd Edition. Thames and Hudson, 2005. Chronicle of The Maya Kings and Queens, by Simon Martin and Nikolai Grube. 2nd Edition. Thames and Hudson, 2008. In addition, various handouts will be on the Blackboard system. Written assignments. In addition to glyph exercises in class and based on museum visits, one final paper, 5-6 pages in length, will be required for this class. A good grade will result from good clear writing and presentation. The content of your essays will rely heavily on readings as well as the contents of the lectures and the field trips. You are expected to digest the content of readings and lectures and express your thoughts critically and analytically – do not simply regurgitate facts and ideas. Remember that citing your sources is always key. Basic guidelines for written work are included in your reader and apply to all four Study Abroad courses. The library at CIRMA and at the Cooperación Española will be available for you for source materials beyond required course texts. Quiz. A short quiz will focus on the history of decipherment and basic glyph readings covered in class. Grading breakdown. Quiz (15%); Overall class participation (20%); class glyph exercises (40%); Final paper (25%). Schedule of Lecture Topics WEEK I (VII) M: Ancient writing systems and decipherment T: Mesoamerican writing and visual systems W: The history of Maya decipherment I Th: The history of Maya decipherment II (Sa: day trip to Iximche, lecture by Dr. Ernesto Arredondo) WEEK II (VIII) M: The Maya script T: Signs and syllables W: No class (visit to Museo Popol Vuh for Landscapes class) Th: The calendar system I F: The calendar system II (special Friday meeting to make up for Wednesday) (free weekend) WEEK III (IX) M: The process of illustration (visit to Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología) T: Iconography and symbolism, guest speaker Karl Taube W: Iconography and symbolism, guest speaker Karl Taube Th: Cofradía workshop on alfombra making (F-Sa: day trip to Museo Ixchel del Traje Indígena, backstrap loom weaving) WEEK IV (X) SEMANA SANTA alfombra-making M: design workshop for alfombra T: materials preparation for alfombra I W: materials preparation for alfombra II Th: making of the alfombra and participation in processions (F, Sa, Su: Easter processions) WEEK V (XI) M: Visual exercise and personal names (Palenque inscriptions) T: Case studies on verbs and emblem glyphs (Piedras Negras and Yaxchilan) W: Case studies on politics and history (Tikal) Th: Case studies on politics and time (La Corona, lecture by Tomás Barrientos) (free weekend – work on papers) WEEK VI (XII) M: Writing on bones, lecture by Sarah Newman (QUIZ) T: Glyphs and the contemporary Maya W: class discussion and wrap-up Th: FINAL PAPER DUE .
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Writing
    Ancient Writing As early civilizations developed, societies became more complicated. Record keeping and communication demanded something beyond symbols and pictures to represent the spoken word. This resource explores the early writing systems of four ancient civilizations: Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, and Mesoamerica. You'll also learn about the Rosetta Stone, the 19th-century discovery that gave scholars the key that unlocked the language of ancient Egypt. Grade Level: Grades 3-5 Collection: Ancient Art, East Asian Art, Egyptian Art, Pre-Columbian Art Culture/Region: America, China, Egypt Subject Area: History and Social Science, Science, Visual Arts Activity Type: Art in Depth HOW ANCIENT WRITING BEGAN… AND ENDED As early civilizations developed, societies became more complicated. Record keeping and communication demanded something beyond symbols and pictures to represent the spoken word. This gallery explores the early writing systems of four ancient civilizations: Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, and Mesoamerica. Here you’ll also learn about the Rosetta Stone, the 19th-century discovery that gave scholars the key that unlocked the language of ancient Egypt. Why were writing systems developed? Communication – Sounds and speech needed to be visually represented. Correspondence – There was a desire to send notes, letters, and instructions. Recording – Bookkeeping tasks became important for counting crops, paying workers’ rations, and collecting taxes. Preservation – Personal stories, rituals, religious texts, hymns, literature, and history all needed to be recorded. Why did some writing systems disappear? Change – Corresponding cultures died out or were absorbed by others. Innovation – Newer, simpler systems replaced older systems. Conquest – Invaders or new rulers imposed their own writing systems. New Beginnings – New ways of writing developed with new belief systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Hieroglyphic Writing
    MAYA HIEROGLYPHIC WRITING Workbook for a Short Course on Maya Hieroglyphic Writing Second Edition, 201 1 J. Kathryn Josserandt and Nicholas A. Hopkins Jaguar Tours 3007 Windy Hill Lane Tallahassee, 32308-4025 FL (850) 385-4344 [email protected] This material is based on work supported in partby Ihe NationalScience Foundation (NSF) under grants BNS-8305806 and BNS-8520749, administered by Ihe Institute for Cultural Ecology of Ihe Tropics (lCEr), and by Ihe National Endowment for Ihe Humanities (NEH), grants RT-20643-86 and RT-21090-89. Any findingsand conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect Ihe views of NSF, NEH, or ICEr. Workbook © Jaguar Tours 2011 CONTENTS Contents Credits and Sources for Figures iv Introductionand Acknowledgements v Bibliography vi Figure 1-1. Mesoamerican Languages x Figure 1-2. The Maya Area xi Figure 1-3. Chronology Chart for tbe Maya Area xii P ART The Classic Maya Maya Hieroglypbic Writing 1: and Figure 14. A FamilyTree of Mayan Languages 2 Mayan Languages 3 Chronology 3 Maya and Earlier Writing 4 Context and Content S Tbe Writing System 5 Figure 1-5. Logographic Signs 6 Figure 1-6. Phonetic Signs 6 Figure 1-7. Landa's "Alphabet" 6 Figure 1-8. A Maya Syllabary 8 Figure 1-9. Reading Order witbin tbe Glyph Block 10 Figure 1-10. Reading Order of Glypb Blocks 10 HieroglyphicTexts II Word Order II Figure 1-11. Examples of Classic Syntax 12 Figure 1-12. Unmarked and Marked Word Order 12 Figure 1-13. Backgrounding and Foregrounding 12-B Figure 1-14.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Maya Code : Michael D. Coe Interview (Night Fire Films)
    BREAKING THE MAYA CODE Transcript of filmed interview Complete interview transcripts at www.nightfirefilms.org MICHAEL D. COE Interviewed April 6 and 7, 2005 at his home in New Haven, Connecticut In the 1950s archaeologist Michael Coe was one of the pioneering investigators of the Olmec Civilization. He later made major contributions to Maya epigraphy and iconography. In more recent years he has studied the Khmer civilization of Cambodia. He is the Charles J. MacCurdy Professor of Anthropology, Emeritus at Yale University, and Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection of Yale’s Peabody Museum of Natural History. He is the author of Breaking the Maya Code and numerous other books including The Maya Scribe and His World, The Maya and Angkor and the Khmer Civilization. In this interview he discusses: The nature of writing systems The origin of Maya writing The role of writing and scribes in Maya culture The status of Maya writing at the time of the Spanish conquest The impact for good and ill of Bishop Landa The persistence of scribal activity in the books of Chilam Balam and the Caste War Letters Early exploration in the Maya region and early publication of Maya texts The work of Constantine Rafinesque, Stephens and Catherwood, de Bourbourg, Ernst Förstemann, and Alfred Maudslay The Maya Corpus Project Cyrus Thomas Sylvanus Morley and the Carnegie Projects Eric Thompson Hermann Beyer Yuri Knorosov Tania Proskouriakoff His own early involvement with study of the Maya and the Olmec His personal relationship with Yuri
    [Show full text]
  • The Writing Revolution
    9781405154062_1_pre.qxd 8/8/08 4:42 PM Page iii The Writing Revolution Cuneiform to the Internet Amalia E. Gnanadesikan A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication 9781405154062_1_pre.qxd 8/8/08 4:42 PM Page iv This edition first published 2009 © 2009 Amalia E. Gnanadesikan Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing program has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical, and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell. Registered Office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services, and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Amalia E. Gnanadesikan to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Writing and Preliterate Societies
    The development of writing and preliterate societies Author: Cynthia Tung Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107209 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2015 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. The development of writing and preliterate societies Cynthia Tung Advisor: MJ Connolly Program in Linguistics Slavic and Eastern Languages Department Boston College April 2015 Abstract This paper explores the question of script choice for a preliterate society deciding to write their language down for the first time through an exposition on types of writing systems and a brief history of a few writing systems throughout the world. Societies sometimes invented new scripts, sometimes adapted existing ones, and other times used a combination of both these techniques. Based on the covered scripts ranging from Mesopotamia to Asia to Europe to the Americas, I identify factors that influence the script decision including neighboring scripts, access to technology, and the circumstances of their introduction to writing. Much of the world uses the Roman alphabet and I present the argument that almost all preliterate societies beginning to write will choose to use a version of the Roman alphabet. However, the alphabet does not fit all languages equally well, and the paper closes out withan investigation into some of these inadequacies and how languages might resolve these issues. Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 What is writing? 6 2.1 Definition . 6 2.2 Types of writing . 6 2.2.1 Pictograms, logograms, and ideograms .
    [Show full text]
  • Paths Into Script Formation in the Ancient Mediterranean Edited by Silvia Ferrara and Miguel Valério
    STUDI MICENEI ED EGEO-ANATOLICI NUOVA SERIE SUPPLEMENTO 1 Paths into Script Formation in the Ancient Mediterranean edited by Silvia Ferrara and Miguel Valério Edizioni Quasar STUDI MICENEI ED EGEO-ANATOLICI NUOVA SERIE SUPPLEMENTO 1 è una pubblicazione del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma ISBN 978-88-7140-898-9 Direttore / Editor-in-chief Anna D’Agata (CNR, Roma) Undertaken with the assistance of Institute for Aegean Prehistory (INSTAP), Philadelphia * Printed with the support of Gerda Henkel Stiftung, Düsseldorf * The editors are grateful to Judith Weingarten for revising the English of the original manuscript Immagine di copertina / Cover illustration Writing Travels the Sea, drawing by Miguel Valério based on signs from the Cretan Hieroglyphic, Byblos and Anatolian Hieroglyphic scripts Stampa e distribuzione / Printing and distribution Edizioni Quasar di Severino Tognon s.r.l. Via Ajaccio 41-43 – 00198 Roma tel. +39 0685358444, fax +39 0685833591 email: [email protected] www.edizioniquasar.it © 2018 CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Autorizzazione Tribunale di Roma nr. 288/2014 del 31.12.2014 SOMMARIO Anna Lucia D’Agata Preface 7 Silvia Ferrara, Miguel Valério Introduction 9 Image-Bound Scripts at the Inception of Writing 1. Roeland P.-J.E. Decorte The Origins of Bronze Age Aegean Writing: Linear A, Cretan Hieroglyphic and a New Proposed Pathway of Script Formation 13 2. Mark Weeden Hieroglyphic Writing on Old Hittite Seals and Sealings? Towards a Material Basis for Further Research 51 Adaptations: Between Pictorialism and Schematism 3. Juan Pablo Vita, José Ángel Zamora The Byblos Script 75 4. Miguel Valério Cypro-Minoan: An Aegean-derived Syllabary on Cyprus (and Elsewhere) 103 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of the World's Major Writing Systems to 1492
    Copyrighted Material 75° the1492 spread of the world’s major writing systems to 1492 Runic inscription Arctic Circle from Sweden, early The adoption of writing marks the end of a society’s 11th century ad. prehistory. Writing has been invented independently many times during world history and is a natural expression of the human capacity for abstract and symbolic thought. Roman inscription from the emperor Trajan’s reign in the Latin alphabet. Writing was a response to growing social and economic complexity and as such it is often considered one of the Ogam defining characteristics of civilization. Runic The earliest known writing system was the Sumerian Mongol pictographic script which developed c. 3400 bc. In the 45° 3rd millennium the pictographs were gradually refined Etruscan Chinese pictographic and simplified, developing into the cuneiform script. Latin Cyrillic alphabet Luvian Proto-Canaanite alphabet Chinese logographic The Sumerian scripts were adopted widely. Sumerian Phoenician-Canaanite alphabet hieroglyphic Korean Mycenaean Linear B Japanese pictographic was adopted by the Elamites and perhaps Sumerian pictographic alphabet Greek alphabet Aramaic script inspired the Indus valley pictographic script. Cuneiform Minoan hieroglyphic Cuneiform Indus was adopted by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Elamites Valley Tibetan Egyptian Elamite script Hittites and Persians among others. pictographic hieroglyphic Nabataean Despite its superficial similarity, the Egyptian Olmec Kufic Brahmic hieroglyphic script, which developed c. 3100 bc, was Epi-Olmec Tropic of Cancer Chinese cursive probably invented independently of Sumerian pictographic. Mixtec Egyptian hieroglyphic inscription script, used from from the 4th century bc. Its influence was limited to Nubia, Minoan Crete and the Zapotec Maya Sabaean Han dynasty times Hittite empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hieroglyphic Decipherment Guide
    Table of Contents Chronological Periods ...........................................................................................1 Classic Period Maya Sites .....................................................................................2 Classic Period & Modern Maya Languages Map ..................................................3 Evolution of Mayan Languages Dendrogram .......................................................4 Reading Order .......................................................................................................6 Phonetic Syllables .................................................................................................7 Numbers ..............................................................................................................13 Dates — Sacred Almanac of 260 Days ...............................................................14 Dates — Solar Calendar of 365 Days .................................................................15 Dates — Long Count ...........................................................................................16 Dates — Supplementary Series: Lords of the Night ............................................17 Dates — Supplementary Series: Lunar Series ....................................................18 Correlation of Maya & Christian Dates ................................................................19 Verbs — Inflectional Endings ..............................................................................21 Verbs — Accession .............................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing and Visualizing Maya Glyphs with Cnns
    1 How to Tell Ancient Signs Apart? Recognizing and Visualizing Maya Glyphs with CNNs GÜLCAN CAN, Idiap Research Institute and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland JEAN-MARC ODOBEZ, Idiap Research Institute and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland DANIEL GATICA-PEREZ, Idiap Research Institute and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland Thanks to the digital preservation of cultural heritage material, multimedia tools, e.g. based on automatic visual processing, enable to considerably ease the work of scholars in the humanities and help them to perform quantitative analysis of their data. In this context, this paper assesses three different Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures along with three learning approaches to train them for hieroglyph classification, which is a very challenging task due to the limited availability of segmented ancient Maya glyphs. More precisely, the first approach, the baseline, relies on pretrained networks as feature extractor. The second one investigates a transfer learning method by fine-tuning a pretrained network for our glyph classification task. The third approach considers directly training networks from scratch with our glyph data. Themerits of three different network architectures are compared: a generic sequential model (i.e. LeNet), a sketch-specific sequential network (i.e. Sketch-a-Net), and the recent Residual Networks. The sketch-specific model trained from scratch outperforms other models and training strategies. Even for a challenging 150-class classification task, this model achieves 70:3% average accuracy and proves itself promising in case of small amount of cultural heritage shape data. Furthermore, we visualize the discriminative parts of glyphs with the recent Grad-CAM method, and demonstrate that the discriminative parts learned by the model agrees in general with the expert annotation of the glyph specificity (diagnostic features).
    [Show full text]
  • SAT Online Practice Test 2 Edition 1.0
    Ivy Global SAT Online Practice Test 2 Edition 1.0 PDF downloads are for single print use only: • To license this file for multiple prints, please email [email protected]. • Downloaded files may include a digital signature to track illegal distribution. • Report suspected piracy to [email protected] and earn a reward. Learn more about our new SAT products at: sat.ivyglobal.com SAT Online Practice Test 2 This publication was written and edited by the team at Ivy Global. Editor-in-Chief: Sarah Pike Producers: Lloyd Min and Junho Suh Editors: Sacha Azor, Corwin Henville, and Nathan Létourneau Contributors: Rebecca Anderson, Thea Bélanger-Polak, Grace Bueler, Alexandra Candib, Alex Dunne, Alex Emond, Bessie Fan, Ian Greig, Elizabeth Hilts, Mark Mendola, Geoffrey Morrison, Ward Pettibone, Arden Rogow-Bales, Kristin Rose, Rachel Schloss, Yolanda Song, and Nathan Tebokkel About the Publisher Ivy Global is a pioneering education company that delivers a wide range of educational services. E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.ivyglobal.com Edition 3.0 – Copyright 2017 by Ivy Global. All rights reserved. SAT is a registered trademark of the College Board, which is not affiliated with this book. Contents How to Use this Booklet ..................................................................................................................... 5 Practice Test ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Answers and Scoring ....................................................................................................................... 79 How to Use this Booklet How to Use this Booklet Welcome, students and parents! This booklet is intended to help students prepare for the SAT, a test administered by the College Board. It contains an overview of the SAT, a few basic test-taking tips, a full-length practice test, and an answer key with scoring directions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alphabet Tree Dren’S Puzzles
    TUGboat, Volume 26 (2005), No. 3 199 A major intellectual step was the invention of Philology the rebus device. This is where the sounds cor- responding to pictograms are combined to form a word. We have all come across these, often as chil- The alphabet tree dren’s puzzles. For example, a picture of a bee Peter Wilson plus a picture of a tray can represent the word ‘be- tray’, or more obscurely a picture of a bee plus a 1 Introduction picure of a female deer can stand for the word ‘be- We got from via Akn and ’ k n to hind’. Even a single pictogram can suffice; for in- XPD stance a pictogram of the sun can be used for both ` k p A K N, and and @ ¼ à in only about 2000 the words ‘sun’ and ‘son’. Consequently symbols years. This is a short story of how that happened can be created that just stand for sounds and then and how we know what the strange symbols mean, they can be combined to form words. This can a k n a k n e.g., and . The fonts in all the markedly reduce the number of symbols required for examples were designed for use with TEX, especially a full writing system. Symbols representing sounds by humanities scholars, and are freely available. are called phonograms. Phonetic writing requires 1.1 Writing systems few glyphs. In these writing systems, the glyphs represent sounds. All writing systems are a com- The earliest known writing is from Sumeria dating bination of phonetic and logographic elements but from about 3400 bc.
    [Show full text]