DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory of Radiological Methodologies for Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inventory of Radiological Methodologies for Sites EPA 402-R-06-007 www.epa.gov October 2006 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies For Sites Contaminated With Radioactive Materials U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory Montgomery, AL 36115 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies This report was prepared for the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory of the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, United States Environmental Protection Agency. It was prepared by Environmental Management Support, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, under contract 68-W-00-084, work assignment 46, and contract 68-W-03-038, work assignments 10 and 26, all managed by David Garman. Mention of trade names or specific applications does not imply endorsement or acceptance by EPA. For further information, contact Dr. John Griggs, U.S. EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory, 540 South Morris Avenue, Montgomery, AL 36115-2601. Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Preface This compendium is part of a continuing effort by the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air and the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation to provide guidance to engineers and scientists responsible for managing the cleanup of sites contaminated with radioactive materials. The document focuses on the radionuclides likely to be found in soil and water at cleanup sites contaminated with radioactive materials. However, its general principles apply also to other media that require analysis to support cleanup activities. It is not a complete catalog of analytical method­ ologies, but rather is intended to assist project managers in understanding the concepts, require­ ments, practices, and limitations of radioanalytical laboratory analyses of environmental samples. As with any technical endeavor, actual radioanalytical projects may require particular methods or techniques to meet specific analytical protocol specifications and data quality objectives. Detailed guidance on recommended radioanalytical practices may be found in current editions of the Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual (MARLAP) and the Multi- Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), both referenced in this document. Comments on this document, or suggestions for future editions, should be addressed to: Dr. John Griggs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory 540 South Morris Avenue Montgomery, AL 36115-2601 (334) 270-3450 [email protected] Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Acknowledgments This manual was developed by the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) of EPA’s Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA) in collaboration with ORIA’s Radiation Protection Division’s Site Cleanup Center and with support from the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Dr. John Griggs served as project lead for this document. Several individuals provided valuable support and input to this document throughout its development. Special acknowledgment and appreciation are extended to Mr. Stuart Walker, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation; Mr. Ronald Wilhelm, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air; Ms. Schatzi Fitz-James, Office of Emergency Management, Homeland Security Laboratory Response Center; and Mr. David Garman, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, NAREL. Numerous individuals both inside and outside of EPA provided peer review of this document, and their suggestions contributed greatly to the quality and consistency of the final document. Technical support was provided by Dr. N. Jay Bassin, Dr. Robert Litman, Dr. David McCurdy, and Mr. Robert Shannon of Environmental Management Support, Inc. Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Contents List of Figures .............................................................. vii List of Tables ............................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................... ix Radiometric Unit Conversions .................................................. xii 1 Introduction ...............................................................1 1.1Scope and Purpose .......................................................2 1.2Principles of Radioactivity.................................................3 1.3 Radioactive Decay Chains .................................................5 1.4 Radionuclides Covered in this Document .....................................5 2 Overview of a Cleanup Process and Radiological Methodologies .....................7 2.1 Laboratory and Field Screening Methodologies ................................7 2.1.1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Methods ..................................7 2.1.2 Gamma Analysis ..................................................9 2.2 Routine Methodologies ..................................................10 2.2.1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Methods .................................10 2.2.2 Spectrometric Methods ............................................10 2.3 Specialized Methodologies ...............................................11 2.3.1 Mass Spectrometric Methods ........................................11 2.3.2 Kinetic Phosphorimetry Analysis ....................................11 2.4 Measurement Quality Objectives and Methodologies ...........................12 3 General Analytical Considerations ............................................12 3.1Site Source Term .......................................................13 3.1.1 DOE Site Cleanup ................................................13 3.1.2 Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials Waste .......................14 3.2Sample Preservation and Transport .........................................16 3.2.1 Water ..........................................................17 3.2.2 Soil ............................................................19 3.3 Parameters Affecting Quantification Using Radioactive Decay Counting Techniques . 19 3.4Negative Results .......................................................20 3.5Measurement Uncertainty ................................................21 3.6 Sample Analysis Turnaround Time .........................................22 3.6.1 Sample Receipt by the Laboratory ....................................23 3.6.2 Sample Preparation Before Analysis ..................................23 3.6.3 Homogeneity and Adequate Sample Preparation ........................24 3.6.4 Sample Digestion .................................................25 3.6.5 Oxidation State and Speciation of Radionuclides in Environmental Samples . 25 3.6.6 Addition of Radiotracers or Carriers ..................................27 3.7Chemical Separation Process..............................................27 3.8Sample Counting .......................................................28 3.9Data Review and Report Generation ........................................28 v Inventory of Radiological Methodologies 3.10 Units Used in Radioactivity Measurements ................................29 3.11 Measurement Quality Objectives and Performance Testing ...................29 3.12 Selecting a Method ..................................................30 3.12.1 Performance-Based Method Selection .................................30 3.12.2 Sources for Specific Method Information Available to the General Public ....31 4 Radioanalytical Methodologies ...............................................31 4.1 Radioactive Decay Emissions Measurements .................................32 4.1.1 Gas Proportional Counting .........................................32 4.1.2 Liquid Scintillation ...............................................32 4.1.2.1 Routine LSC Analysis ..........................................33 4.1.2.2 Photon-Electron Rejecting Alpha Liquid Scintillation .................33 4.1.2.3 Cerenkov Counting ............................................34 4.1.3 Gamma Spectrometry .............................................34 4.1.4 Alpha Spectrometry ...............................................36 4.2 Atom-Counting Methods .................................................37 4.2.1 Kinetic Phosphorimetry Analysis ....................................37 4.2.2 Mass Spectrometry ...............................................38 4.2.2.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry .....................39 4.2.2.2 Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry .............................40 4.2.2.3 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry ...................................40 4.2.3 Summary of Analytical Methodologies, Minimum Detectable Concentrations, and Instrument Types .................................................41 5 Chemical and Physical Properties for Selected Radionuclides .......................43 5.1Americium ............................................................43 5.2Bismuth ..............................................................44 5.3Carbon ...............................................................44 5.4Cesium ...............................................................45 5.5Cobalt................................................................45 5.6 Hydrogen (Tritium) .....................................................46 5.7Iodine ................................................................47 5.8Iridium ...............................................................47 5.9Lead .................................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spectroscopy of Neutron-Rich 34,35,36,37,38 P Populated In
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C 92, 044308 (2015) , , , , Spectroscopy of neutron-rich 34 35 36 37 38P populated in binary grazing reactions R. Chapman,1,* A. Hodsdon,1 M. Bouhelal,2 F. Haas,3 X. Liang,1 F. Azaiez,4 Z. M. Wang,1 B. R. Behera,5 M. Burns,1 E. Caurier,3 L. Corradi,5 D. Curien,3 A. N. Deacon,6 Zs. Dombradi,´ 7 E. Farnea,8 E. Fioretto,5 A. Gadea,5 F. Ibrahim,4 A. Jungclaus,9 K. Keyes,1 V. Kumar, 1 S. Lunardi,8 N. Marginean,˘ 5,10 G. Montagnoli,8 D. R. Napoli,5 F. Nowacki,3 J. Ollier,1,11 D. O’Donnell,1,12 A. Papenberg,1 G. Pollarolo,13 M.-D. Salsac,14 F. Scarlassara,8 J. F. Smith,1 K. M. Spohr,1 M. Stanoiu,10 A. M. Stefanini,5 S. Szilner,5,15 M. Trotta,5 and D. Verney4 1School of Engineering and Computing, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom, and The Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA) 2Laboratoire de Physique Appliquee´ et Theorique,´ Universite´ Larbi Tebessa,´ Tebessa,´ Algerie´ 3IPHC, UMR7178, CNRS-IN2P3, and Universite´ de Strasbourg, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France 4IPN, IN2P3-CNRS and Universite´ Paris-Sud, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France 5INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy 6Schuster Laboratory, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom 7MTA ATOMKI, P.O. Box 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary 8Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN-Sezione di Padova, Universita` di Padova, I35131 Padova, Italy 9Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, E-28006 Madrid, Spain 10Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering-IFIN-HH, Strasse Atomistilor No.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides
    OAK RIDGE ORNL/TM-2006/583 NATIONAL LABORATORY MANAGED BY UT-BATTELLE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides An Uncertainty Analysis for Risk Coefficients Reported in Federal Guidance Report No. 13 January 2007 Prepared by D. J. Pawela R. W. Leggettb K. F. Eckermanb C. B. Nelsona aOffice of Radiation and Indoor Air U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 bOak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge: Web site: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD: 703-487-4639 Fax: 703-605-6900 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: 865-576-8401 Fax: 865-576-5728 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDICAL RADIOISOTOPES PRODUCTION WITHOUT a NUCLEAR REACTOR the Vast Majority of the Public Thinks That Research Reactors, Such 1 Introduction 2
    june 4, 2010 | No. 710/711 MEDICAL RADIOISOTOPES PRODUCTION WITHOUT A NUCLEAR REACTOR The vast majority of the public thinks that research reactors, such 1 Introduction 2 as the High Flux Reactor (HFR) in Petten, the Netherlands, are 2 The Emergence and essential for the supply of medical radioisotopes. And indeed Development of these nuclear reactors are currently producing the vast majority of Nuclear Medicine 3 the isotopes. The nuclear industries like to maintain this widespread 3 Medical Radioisotopes & misunderstanding to justify their right to exist. A brief look in the Applications 8 history of nuclear medicine learns that all medical radioisotopes 4 Reactor-based were originally manufactured by another type of production. Radioisotopes Produced by (710/1.) Laka Foundation – On May 22, agriculture, industry and fundamental Cyclotrons? 12 a research report was published on the research. Though most isotopes have no alternatives for reactor-based production practical value, dozens of isotopes have 5 Recent Developments of medical isotopes: "Medical valuable applications. At present there and Prospects in Radioisotopes Production 17 Radioisotopes Production Without A are up to 200 radioisotopes used on a Nuclear Reactor", written by Henk van regular basis, and most of them are 6 Discussion, Conclusions and der Keur of the Laka Foundation. The produced artificially. Recommendations 19 report tries to find an answer to the key question: Is it possible to ban the use of Until 2007 there was an almost research reactors for the production of uninterrupted supply of cheap subsidized medical radioisotopes? It will make clear reactor-produced isotopes, there was no that the nuclear industry is using the need to search for alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table of Elements
    The origin of the elements – Dr. Ille C. Gebeshuber, www.ille.com – Vienna, March 2007 The origin of the elements Univ.-Ass. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. techn. Ille C. Gebeshuber Institut für Allgemeine Physik Technische Universität Wien Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/134 1040 Wien Tel. +43 1 58801 13436 FAX: +43 1 58801 13499 Internet: http://www.ille.com/ © 2007 © Photographs of the elements: Mag. Jürgen Bauer, http://www.smart-elements.com 1 The origin of the elements – Dr. Ille C. Gebeshuber, www.ille.com – Vienna, March 2007 I. The Periodic table............................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement........................................................................................................................... 5 Periodicity of chemical properties.......................................................................................... 6 Groups and periods............................................................................................................. 6 Periodic trends of groups.................................................................................................... 6 Periodic trends of periods................................................................................................... 7 Examples ................................................................................................................................ 7 Noble gases .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.54
    PHOSPHORUS EXCHANGE IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON BY THEODORE R. RICE FISHERY BULLETIN 80 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Douglas McKay, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, John L. Farley, Director ABSTRACT Phosphorus exchange in Nitzschia· clostai'iu.In, isoiated and grown in pure culture, was demunstrated by using rudioactive phosphorus find was ~h()\\"n to "IlI'Y with changes in the phosphorus concentration of the medium amI with the ph~'sioiogical conditions of t,he cells. A modification of MiCluel's nutrient solutions was made to prevent the formation of precil)itates when autoclavecl, since it was necessary that'the radioactive phusphorus he eithel' in solution or within the ('elll>, Complete recovery of cells fur radioactive l\SSll~' was accomplished b~' using n harium-sulfate filter pad in a detachable tiltel'iug apparatus. The gl'entest exchange occurred when cells gl'own in high concentrntions (If phosphorus were tilter-washed. Also exchange between ('ells and medium wus determined while the cells were photo­ synthesizing, and when they wei'€' kept in the dark. A redistribution of intra­ cellular phosphorus between the inorganic and organir fractions occul'l"ed when cells wel'e placed in the light in medium .containing only a tmce of phosphorus.. Little phosphorus was converted into ~he organic state by cells kept in the dal'k. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Douglas McKay, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, John L. Farley, Director PHOSPHORUS EXCHANGE IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON BY THEODORE R. RICE FISHERY BULLETIN 80 From Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service VOLUME S4 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE • WASHINGTON: 1953 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Lattices, Mass and Stability
    Open Access Library Journal Nuclear Lattices, Mass and Stability Henry Gu Cao, Zhiliang Cao, Wenan Qiang Northwestern University, Evanston, USA Email: [email protected] Received 20 April 2015; accepted 7 May 2015; published 13 May 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and OALib. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract A nucleus has a lattice configuration, a mass, and a half-life. There are many nuclear theories: BCS formalism focuses on Neutron-proton (np) pairing; AB initio calculation uses NCFC model; SEMF uses water drop model. However, the accepted theories give neither précised lattices of lower mass nuclei, nor an accurate calculation of nuclear mass. This paper uses the results of the latest Unified Field Theory (UFT) to derive a lattice configuration for each isotope. We found that a sim- plified BCS formalism can be used to calculate energies of the predicted lattice structure. Fur- thermore, mass calculation results and NMR data can be used to determine the right lattice struc- ture. Our results demonstrate the inseparable relationship among nuclear lattices, mass, and sta- bility. We anticipate that our essay will provide a new method that can predict the lattice of each isotope without the use of advanced mathematics. For example, the lattice of an unknown nucleus can be predicted using trial and error. The mass of the nuclear lattice can be calculated. If the cal- culation result matches the experimental data and NMR pattern supports the lattice as well, then the predicted nuclear lattice configuration is valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Radionuclide Production
    African School of Physics 2010 Radionuclide production Marco Silari CERN, Geneva, Switzerland M. Silari – Radionuclide production ASP2010 - Stellenbosh (SA) 1 Radionuclide production The use of radionuclides in the physical and biological sciences can be broken down into three general categories: Radiotracers Imaging (95% of medical uses) SPECT (99mTc, 201Tl, 123I) PET (11C, 13N, 15O, 18F) Therapy (5% of medical uses) Brachytherapy (103Pd) Targeted therapy (211At, 213Bi) Relevant physical parameters (function of the application) Type of emission (α, β+, β–, γ) Energy of emission Half-life Radiation dose (essentially determined by the parameters above) Radionuclides can be produced by Nuclear reactors Particle accelerators (mainly cyclotrons) M. Silari – Radionuclide production ASP2010 - Stellenbosh (SA) 2 First practical application (as radiotracer) The first practical application of a radioisotope (as radiotracer) was made by G. de Hevesy (a young Hungarian student working with naturally radioactive materials) in Manchester in 1911 (99 years ago!) In 1924 de Hevesy, who had become a physician, used radioactive isotopes of lead as tracers in bone studies. M. Silari – Radionuclide production ASP2010 - Stellenbosh (SA) 3 Brief historical development • 1932: the invention of the cyclotron by E. Lawrence makes it possible to produce radioactive isotopes of a number of biologically important elements • 1937: Hamilton and Stone use radioactive sodium clinically • 1938: Hertz, Roberts and Evans use radioactive iodine in the study of thyroid physiology • 1939: J.H. Lawrence, Scott and Tuttle study leukemia with radioactive phosphorus • 1940: Hamilton and Soley perform studies of iodine metabolism by the thyroid gland in situ by using radioiodine • 1941: first medical cyclotron installed at Washington University, St Louis, for the production of radioactive isotopes of phosphorus, iron, arsenic and sulphur • After WWII: following the development of the fission process, most radioisotopes of medical interest begin to be produced in nuclear reactors • 1951: Cassen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Isotopes of Phosphorus
    Stable Isotopes of Phosphorus Isotope Z(p) N(n) Atomic Mass Natural Abundance Half-life Nuclear Spin P-31 15 16 30.9737620 100.00% Stable 1/2+ Phosphorus was discovered in 1669 by Hennig Brand. Its name originates from the Greek word phosphoros, which means “bringer of light.” Elemental phosphorus in its solid phase exists in three major allotropic forms: White or yellow phosphorus is a white, soft, wax-like, transparent mass which often acquires a yellow appearance due to impurities, especially traces of red phosphorus. It has a garlic-like odor. It is made up of cubic crystals, has a density of 1.82 g/cm3, and melts at 44.10 ºC to a colorless or yellowish liquid. When cooled below -76.90 ºC, the cubic alpha form converts to a hexagonal beta modification with a density of 1.88 g/cm3. Red phosphorus is obtained from white phosphorus by heating it to 230-240 ºC, allowing complete conversion to occur in about 48 hours. Conversion is catalyzed by sulfur, iodine and selenium. Red phosphorus exhibits three important modifications: an amorphous form at ordinary temperatures, a triclinic crystalline form (probably most stable), and a hexagonal or tetragonal form that may prevail at higher temperatures. Red phosphorus has a density of 2.00-2.31 g/cm3 and melts at 590 ºC. Black phosphorus occurs in two forms: an amorphous modification having a laminar structure similar to graphite, and an orthorhombic crystalline form. The density of black phosphorus may vary between 2.20 and 2.69 g/cm3. Black phosphorus is obtained from white phosphorus by heating the latter to 220 ºC under an extremely high pressure of about 10,000 atm.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,707,352 Stavrianpoulos 45 Date of Patent: Nov
    United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 4,707,352 Stavrianpoulos 45 Date of Patent: Nov. 17, 1987 (54) METHOD OF RADIOACTIVELY LABELNG OTHER PUBLICATIONS DAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTICAGENTS CONTAINING ACHELATING GROUP Meares et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 69, 3718-3722 (1972). 75 Inventor: Jannis G. Stavrianpoulos, New York, DeRiemer et al., J. Med. Chem., 22, 1019-1023 (1979). N.Y. Primary Examiner-Christine M. Nucker Attorney, Agent, or Firm-James F. Haley, Jr. (73) Assignee: Enzo Biochem, Inc., New York, N.Y. 57 ABSTRACT A method of forming a therapeutic or diagnostic agent 21 Appl. No.: 575,397 labeled with a radioactive metal ion, which comprises: contacting an unlabeled therapeutic or diagnostic agent, 22) Filed: Jan. 30, 1984 consisting of a substantially non-metal chelating portion and a chelating portion capable of chelating with the (51) Int, C. ...................... A61K 43/00; A61K 49/02 radioactive metal ion, with an ion transfer material (52) U.S. Cl. ......................................... 424/1.1; 424/9; having the radioactive metal ion bound thereto and 424/85; 424/88; 424/89; 424/92; 530/350; having a binding affinity for the radioactive metal less 530/402; 530/403; 530/405; 530/406; 536/1.1; than the binding affinity of the chelating portion for the 536/26; 536/27; 536/28 radioactive metal ion, wherein prior to contacting the (58) Field of Search ........................ 424/1.1, 9, 85, 88, chelating portion is unchelated or is chelated with a 424/89, 92; 530/350, 402, 403, 405, 406; second metal having a binding affinity with the chelat 536/26-28, 1.1 ing portion less than the binding affinity of the radioac tive metal ion, whereby a radiolabeled therapeutic or (56) References Cited diagnostic agent is formed by the contacting, and sepa U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Cyclotrons Used in the Production of Radio-Isotopes For
    Proceedings of CYCLOTRONS 2010, Lanzhou, China FRM2CIO01 REVIEW OF CYCLOTRONS USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF RADIO- ISOTOPES FOR BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS P. W. Schmor, AAPS Inc., TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada Abstract Hammersmith Hospital in London put into operation a Cyclotrons are the primary tool for producing the cyclotron wholly dedicated to radionuclide production. shorter-lived proton-rich radio-isotopes currently used in Scanditronix was founded in 1961 as a private company the biosciences. Although the primary use of the cyclo- to commercialize cyclotrons for use in the medical field. tron produced short-lived radio-isotopes is in PET/CT and Radioactive isotopes have both diagnostic and thera- SPECT diagnostic medical procedures, cyclotrons are peutic applications in Nuclear Medicine. PET (positron also producing longer-lived isotopes for therapeutic pro- emission tomography), PET/CT and SPECT (single pho- cedures. Commercial suppliers are responding by provid- ton emission computed tomography) are the main diag- ing a range of cyclotrons in the energy range of 3 to 70 nostic procedures in nuclear medicine. Radioactive iso- MeV. The cyclotrons generally have multiple beams ser- topes for biomedical applications are produced in reactors vicing multiple targets. This paper provides a comparison and with accelerators. Of particular importance for PET of some of the capabilities of the various current cyclo- are the short-lived positron emitters, 11C, 13N, 15O and trons. The use of nuclear medicine and the number of 18F. Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen represent basic con- cyclotrons providing the needed isotopes is increasing. In stituents of organic matter and this characteristic permits the future it is expected that there will be a new genera- the labelling of a great variety of radio-pharmaceuticals.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Radiological Methodologies for Sites
    A \ Inventory of Radiological Methodologies For Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Materials EPA 402-R-06-007 www.epa.gov October 2006 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies For Sites Contaminated With Radioactive Materials U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory Montgomery, AL 36115 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies This report was prepared for the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory of the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, United States Environmental Protection Agency. It was prepared by Environmental Management Support, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, under contract 68-W-00-084, work assignment 46, and contract 68-W-03-038, work assignments 10 and 26, all managed by David Garman. Mention of trade names or specific applications does not imply endorsement or acceptance by EPA. For further information, contact Dr. John Griggs, U.S. EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory, 540 South Morris Avenue, Montgomery, AL 36115-2601. Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Preface This compendium is part of a continuing effort by the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air and the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation to provide guidance to engineers and scientists responsible for managing the cleanup of sites contaminated with radioactive materials. The document focuses on the radionuclides likely to be found in soil and water at cleanup sites contaminated with radioactive materials. However, its general principles apply also to other media that require analysis to support cleanup activities. It is not a complete catalog of analytical method­ ologies, but rather is intended to assist project managers in understanding the concepts, require­ ments, practices, and limitations of radioanalytical laboratory analyses of environmental samples.
    [Show full text]