DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory of Radiological Methodologies for Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inventory of Radiological Methodologies for Sites A \ Inventory of Radiological Methodologies For Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Materials EPA 402-R-06-007 www.epa.gov October 2006 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies For Sites Contaminated With Radioactive Materials U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory Montgomery, AL 36115 Inventory of Radiological Methodologies This report was prepared for the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory of the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, United States Environmental Protection Agency. It was prepared by Environmental Management Support, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, under contract 68-W-00-084, work assignment 46, and contract 68-W-03-038, work assignments 10 and 26, all managed by David Garman. Mention of trade names or specific applications does not imply endorsement or acceptance by EPA. For further information, contact Dr. John Griggs, U.S. EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory, 540 South Morris Avenue, Montgomery, AL 36115-2601. Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Preface This compendium is part of a continuing effort by the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air and the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation to provide guidance to engineers and scientists responsible for managing the cleanup of sites contaminated with radioactive materials. The document focuses on the radionuclides likely to be found in soil and water at cleanup sites contaminated with radioactive materials. However, its general principles apply also to other media that require analysis to support cleanup activities. It is not a complete catalog of analytical method­ ologies, but rather is intended to assist project managers in understanding the concepts, require­ ments, practices, and limitations of radioanalytical laboratory analyses of environmental samples. As with any technical endeavor, actual radioanalytical projects may require particular methods or techniques to meet specific analytical protocol specifications and data quality objectives. Detailed guidance on recommended radioanalytical practices may be found in current editions of the Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual (MARLAP) and the Multi- Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), both referenced in this document. Comments on this document, or suggestions for future editions, should be addressed to: Dr. John Griggs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory 540 South Morris Avenue Montgomery, AL 36115-2601 (334) 270-3450 [email protected] Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Acknowledgments This manual was developed by the National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) of EPA’s Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA) in collaboration with ORIA’s Radiation Protection Division’s Site Cleanup Center and with support from the Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Dr. John Griggs served as project lead for this document. Several individuals provided valuable support and input to this document throughout its development. Special acknowledgment and appreciation are extended to Mr. Stuart Walker, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation; Mr. Ronald Wilhelm, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air; Ms. Schatzi Fitz-James, Office of Emergency Management, Homeland Security Laboratory Response Center; and Mr. David Garman, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, NAREL. Numerous individuals both inside and outside of EPA provided peer review of this document, and their suggestions contributed greatly to the quality and consistency of the final document. Technical support was provided by Dr. N. Jay Bassin, Dr. Robert Litman, Dr. David McCurdy, and Mr. Robert Shannon of Environmental Management Support, Inc. Inventory of Radiological Methodologies Contents List of Figures .............................................................. vii List of Tables ............................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................... ix Radiometric Unit Conversions .................................................. xii 1 Introduction ...............................................................1 1.1Scope and Purpose .......................................................2 1.2Principles of Radioactivity.................................................3 1.3 Radioactive Decay Chains .................................................5 1.4 Radionuclides Covered in this Document .....................................5 2 Overview of a Cleanup Process and Radiological Methodologies .....................7 2.1 Laboratory and Field Screening Methodologies ................................7 2.1.1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Methods ..................................7 2.1.2 Gamma Analysis ..................................................9 2.2 Routine Methodologies ..................................................10 2.2.1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Methods .................................10 2.2.2 Spectrometric Methods ............................................10 2.3 Specialized Methodologies ...............................................11 2.3.1 Mass Spectrometric Methods ........................................11 2.3.2 Kinetic Phosphorimetry Analysis ....................................11 2.4 Measurement Quality Objectives and Methodologies ...........................12 3 General Analytical Considerations ............................................12 3.1Site Source Term .......................................................13 3.1.1 DOE Site Cleanup ................................................13 3.1.2 Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials Waste .......................14 3.2Sample Preservation and Transport .........................................16 3.2.1 Water ..........................................................17 3.2.2 Soil ............................................................19 3.3 Parameters Affecting Quantification Using Radioactive Decay Counting Techniques . 19 3.4Negative Results .......................................................20 3.5Measurement Uncertainty ................................................21 3.6 Sample Analysis Turnaround Time .........................................22 3.6.1 Sample Receipt by the Laboratory ....................................23 3.6.2 Sample Preparation Before Analysis ..................................23 3.6.3 Homogeneity and Adequate Sample Preparation ........................24 3.6.4 Sample Digestion .................................................25 3.6.5 Oxidation State and Speciation of Radionuclides in Environmental Samples . 25 3.6.6 Addition of Radiotracers or Carriers ..................................27 3.7Chemical Separation Process..............................................27 3.8Sample Counting .......................................................28 3.9Data Review and Report Generation ........................................28 v Inventory of Radiological Methodologies 3.10 Units Used in Radioactivity Measurements ................................29 3.11 Measurement Quality Objectives and Performance Testing ...................29 3.12 Selecting a Method ..................................................30 3.12.1 Performance-Based Method Selection .................................30 3.12.2 Sources for Specific Method Information Available to the General Public ....31 4 Radioanalytical Methodologies ...............................................31 4.1 Radioactive Decay Emissions Measurements .................................32 4.1.1 Gas Proportional Counting .........................................32 4.1.2 Liquid Scintillation ...............................................32 4.1.2.1 Routine LSC Analysis ..........................................33 4.1.2.2 Photon-Electron Rejecting Alpha Liquid Scintillation .................33 4.1.2.3 Cerenkov Counting ............................................34 4.1.3 Gamma Spectrometry .............................................34 4.1.4 Alpha Spectrometry ...............................................36 4.2 Atom-Counting Methods .................................................37 4.2.1 Kinetic Phosphorimetry Analysis ....................................37 4.2.2 Mass Spectrometry ...............................................38 4.2.2.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry .....................39 4.2.2.2 Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry .............................40 4.2.2.3 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry ...................................40 4.2.3 Summary of Analytical Methodologies, Minimum Detectable Concentrations, and Instrument Types .................................................41 5 Chemical and Physical Properties for Selected Radionuclides .......................43 5.1Americium ............................................................43 5.2Bismuth ..............................................................44 5.3Carbon ...............................................................44 5.4Cesium ...............................................................45 5.5Cobalt................................................................45 5.6 Hydrogen (Tritium) .....................................................46 5.7Iodine ................................................................47 5.8Iridium ...............................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spectroscopy of Neutron-Rich 34,35,36,37,38 P Populated In
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C 92, 044308 (2015) , , , , Spectroscopy of neutron-rich 34 35 36 37 38P populated in binary grazing reactions R. Chapman,1,* A. Hodsdon,1 M. Bouhelal,2 F. Haas,3 X. Liang,1 F. Azaiez,4 Z. M. Wang,1 B. R. Behera,5 M. Burns,1 E. Caurier,3 L. Corradi,5 D. Curien,3 A. N. Deacon,6 Zs. Dombradi,´ 7 E. Farnea,8 E. Fioretto,5 A. Gadea,5 F. Ibrahim,4 A. Jungclaus,9 K. Keyes,1 V. Kumar, 1 S. Lunardi,8 N. Marginean,˘ 5,10 G. Montagnoli,8 D. R. Napoli,5 F. Nowacki,3 J. Ollier,1,11 D. O’Donnell,1,12 A. Papenberg,1 G. Pollarolo,13 M.-D. Salsac,14 F. Scarlassara,8 J. F. Smith,1 K. M. Spohr,1 M. Stanoiu,10 A. M. Stefanini,5 S. Szilner,5,15 M. Trotta,5 and D. Verney4 1School of Engineering and Computing, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom, and The Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA) 2Laboratoire de Physique Appliquee´ et Theorique,´ Universite´ Larbi Tebessa,´ Tebessa,´ Algerie´ 3IPHC, UMR7178, CNRS-IN2P3, and Universite´ de Strasbourg, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France 4IPN, IN2P3-CNRS and Universite´ Paris-Sud, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France 5INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy 6Schuster Laboratory, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom 7MTA ATOMKI, P.O. Box 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary 8Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN-Sezione di Padova, Universita` di Padova, I35131 Padova, Italy 9Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, E-28006 Madrid, Spain 10Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering-IFIN-HH, Strasse Atomistilor No.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article the Copper Radioisotopes: a Systematic Review with Special Interest to Cu
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2014, Article ID 786463, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/786463 Review Article The Copper Radioisotopes: A Systematic Review with Special Interest to 64Cu Artor Niccoli Asabella,1 Giuseppe Lucio Cascini,2 Corinna Altini,1 Domenico Paparella,1 Antonio Notaristefano,1 and Giuseppe Rubini1 1 NuclearMedicine,UniversityofBariAldoMoro,PiazzaG.Cesare11,70124Bari,Italy 2 Nuclear Medicine, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Viale Europa, Localita´ Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy Correspondence should be addressed to Artor Niccoli Asabella; [email protected] Received 23 December 2013; Accepted 18 April 2014; Published 7 May 2014 Academic Editor: Gianluca Valentini Copyright © 2014 Artor Niccoli Asabella et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copper (Cu) is an important trace element in humans; it plays a role as a cofactor for numerous enzymes and other proteins crucial 63 for respiration, iron transport, metabolism, cell growth, and hemostasis. Natural copper comprises two stable isotopes, Cu and 65 60 61 62 64 Cu, and 5 principal radioisotopes for molecular imaging applications ( Cu, Cu, Cu, and Cu) and in vivo targeted radiation 64 67 therapy ( Cu and Cu). The two potential ways to produce Cu radioisotopes concern the use of the cyclotron or the reactor. A noncopper target is used to produce noncarrier-added Cu thanks to a chemical separation from the target material using ion exchange chromatography achieving a high amount of radioactivity with the lowest possible amount of nonradioactive isotopes.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY of the BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' Iosfery)
    XA04N2887 INIS-XA-N--259 L.A. Pertsov TRANSLATED FROM RUSSIAN Published for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations L. A. PERTSOV THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE (Prirodnaya Radioaktivnost' iosfery) Atomizdat NMoskva 1964 Translated from Russian Israel Program for Scientific Translations Jerusalem 1967 18 02 AEC-tr- 6714 Published Pursuant to an Agreement with THE U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON, D. C. Copyright (D 1967 Israel Program for scientific Translations Ltd. IPST Cat. No. 1802 Translated and Edited by IPST Staff Printed in Jerusalem by S. Monison Available from the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Va. 22151 VI/ Table of Contents Introduction .1..................... Bibliography ...................................... 5 Chapter 1. GENESIS OF THE NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY OF THE BIOSPHERE ......................... 6 § Some historical problems...................... 6 § 2. Formation of natural radioactive isotopes of the earth ..... 7 §3. Radioactive isotope creation by cosmic radiation. ....... 11 §4. Distribution of radioactive isotopes in the earth ........ 12 § 5. The spread of radioactive isotopes over the earth's surface. ................................. 16 § 6. The cycle of natural radioactive isotopes in the biosphere. ................................ 18 Bibliography ................ .................. 22 Chapter 2. PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES. ........... 24 § 1. The contribution of individual radioactive isotopes to the total radioactivity of the biosphere. ............... 24 § 2. Properties of radioactive isotopes not belonging to radio- active families . ............ I............ 27 § 3. Properties of radioactive isotopes of the radioactive families. ................................ 38 § 4. Properties of radioactive isotopes of rare-earth elements .
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Transmutation of Nickel in Glow Discharge
    International Journal of Materials Science ISSN 0973-4589 Volume 12, Number 3 (2017), pp. 405-409 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com Hydrogen Transmutation of Nickel in Glow Discharge Vladimir K. Nevolin National Research University of Electronic Technology (MIET), Moscow, Russia. Abstract Background: The possibility of the existence of subatomic hydrogen states was theoretically predicted previously. Objectives: Prove that the transmutation of elements is possible in specially prepared conditions for hydrogen. Methodology: By comparing the mass spectra of deposits on silicon substrates and target electrodes, it is shown that a change in the composition is observed in a magnetron Argon. Results: An increase in the concentration of 62 60 the nickel isotope 28 Ni and a decrease in the isotope concentration 28 Ni are shown. Conclusion: These results confirm the results obtained earlier in the heat generator Rossi, who worked more than a year, found an increase in the 62 isotope 28 Ni due to a decrease in the proportion of other isotopes. Keywords: transmutation, isotopes of nickel, glow discharge, argon, hydrogen INTRODUCION It is considered that the cold transmutation of elements (cold nuclear reactions) has been experimentally demonstrated [1]. On the basis of this phenomenon, energy generators are created in which long-term release of thermal energy in excess of expended energy is observed [2]. From many experimental studies it can be seen that hydrogen, which plays a pivotal role in the reaction zone, may be delivered through a variety of chemical compounds; for example, using lithium aluminium hydride LiAlH4. An analysis of the products of nuclear reactions suggests the possibility of many simultaneous nuclear fusion and decomposition reactions [3].
    [Show full text]
  • 22.101 Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Problem Set No. 1 Due: Sept
    22.101 Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Problem Set No. 1 Due: Sept. 13, 2006 Problem 1 Before getting into the concepts of nuclear physics, every student should have some feeling for the numerical values of properties of nuclear radiations, such as energy and speed, wavelength, and frequency, etc. This involves some back of the envelope calculations using appropriate universal constants. (i) A thermal neutron in a nuclear reactor is a neutron with kinetic energy equal to kBT, where kB is the Boltzmann’s constant and T is the temperature of the reactor. Explain briefly the physical basis of this statement. Taking T to be the room temperature, 20C, calculate the energy of the thermal neutron (in units of ev), and then find its speed v (in cm/sec), the de Broglie wavelength λ (in A) and circular frequency ω (radian/sec). Compare these values with the energy, speed, and interatomic distance of atoms that make up the materials in the reactor. What is the point of comparing the neutron wavelength with typical atomic separations in a solid? (ii) Consider a 2 Kev x-ray, calculate the frequency and wavelength of this photon. What would be the point of comparing the x-ray wavelength with that of the thermal neutron? For an electron with wavelength equal to that of the thermal neutron, what energy would it have? 2 2 (iii) The classical radius of the electron, defined as e / mec , with e being the electron charge, me the electron rest mass, and c the speed of light, has the value of 2.818 x 10-13 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Set 3 Solutions
    22.01 Fall 2016, Problem Set 3 Solutions October 9, 2016 Complete all the assigned problems, and do make sure to show your intermediate work. 1 Activity and Half Lives 1. Given the half lives and modern-day abundances of the three natural isotopes of uranium, calculate the isotopic fractions of uranium when the Earth first formed 4.5 billion years ago. Today, uranium consists of 0.72% 235U, 99.2745% 238U, and 0.0055% 234U. However, it is clear that the half life of 234U (245,500 years) is so short compared to the lifetime of the Earth (4,500,000,000 years) that it would have all decayed away had there been some during the birth of the Earth. Therefore, we look a little closer, and find that 234U is an indirect decay product of 238U, by tracing it back from its parent nuclides on the KAERI table: α β− β− 238U −! 234T h −! 234P a −! 234U (1) Therefore we won’t consider there being any more 234U than would normally be in equi­ librium with the 238U around at the time. We set up the two remaining equations as follows: −t t ;235 −t t ;238 = 1=2 = 1=2 N235 = N0235 e N238 = N0238 e (2) Using the current isotopic abundances from above as N235 and N238 , the half lives from n 9 t 1 1 the KAERI Table of Nuclides t =2;235 = 703800000 y; t =2;238 = 4:468 · 10 y , and the lifetime of the earth in years (keeping everything in the same units), we arrive at the following expressions for N0235 and N0238 : N235 0:0072 N238 0:992745 N0235 =−t = 9 = 4:307N0238 =−t = 9 = 2:718 (3) =t1 ;235 −4:5·10 =7:038·108 =t1 ;238 −4:5·10 =4:468·109 e =2 e e =2 e Finally, taking the ratios of these two relative abundances gives us absolute abundances: 4:307 2:718 f235 = = 0:613 f238 = = 0:387 (4) 4:307 + 2:718 4:307 + 2:718 235U was 61.3% abundant, and 238U was 38.7% abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION By
    CYCLOTRON BOMBARDMENTS WITH HE3 a n d r 3 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philisophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas William Donaven, 3.S., M.A The Ohio State University 1952 Approved by Adviser ( fe/\J TABLE OF CONTENTS Cyclotron Bombardments with He^ or H3 Acknowledgements Page Introduction 1 Description of Apparatus 3 Method of Operation 13 Purification of He^ or 17 Results 20 Conclusions 30 References 32 Miscellaneous Photographs 36 Autobiography 1*0 i 918254 Acknowledgements It is with deep appreciation that I extend thanks to Professor M. L. Pool for his guidance in this work. Special thanks is also due to Dr. D. N. Kundu for his advice, help, and cooperation in this project. Acknowledgement is also made to Mr. Paul Weiler and Mr. Donald Moore of the cyclotron staff, and to the machine shop under Mr. Carl McWhirt, for their aid in completing this work. The support given me through fellowships by The Ohio State University Physics Department and by the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies is gratefully acknowledged. ii INTRODUCTION The naturally occurring elements whose atoms are heavier than Bismuth, i.e. Po, At, Rn, Fr, Th, Pa, U, etc. are all radioactive. The remainder of the elements may be made radioactive by hitting them with high speed nuclei of other elements. The elements whose nuclei are normally used to create radioactivity are hydrogen and helium. In order to give a nucleus a high speed with the minimum of equipment, it is necessary to strip all of the electrons from the atom, leaving its bare nucleus to be accelerated.
    [Show full text]
  • I N Dc International Nuclear Data Committee Iaea
    International Atomic Energy Agency INDC(CCP)-335 Distr.: L I N DC INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR DATA COMMITTEE TRANSLATION OF SELECTED PAPERS PUBLISHED IN YADERNYE KONSTANTY (NUCLEAR CONSTANTS 3, 1990) (Original Report in Russian was distributed as INDC(CCP)-328/G) Translated by A. Lorenz for the International Atomic Energy Agency July 1991 IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION, WAG RAMERSTRASSE 5, A-1400 VIENNA INDC(CCP)-335 Distr.: L TRANSLATION OF SELECTED PAPERS PUBLISHED IN YADERNYE KONSTANTY (NUCLEAR CONSTANTS 3, 1990) (Original Report in Russian was distributed as INDC(CCP)-328/G) Translated by A. Lorenz for the International Atomic Energy Agency July 1991 Reproduced by the IAEA in Austria August 1991 91-03116 Contents The Total Neutron Cross-section and Resonance Parameters for the Even 58,60,62,64^ isotopes for Energies Ranging from 2eV to 8000eV (Pages 27-38 of Original) By L.L. Litvinskij, P.N. Vorona, V.G. Krivenko, V.A. Libtnan, A.V. Murzin, G.N. Novosselov, N.A. Trofimova, O.L. Tchervonnaya The 54Fe(n,a)51Cr Thermal Neutron Reaction Cross-section (Pages 39-43 of Original) By S.P. Makarov, G.A. Pik-Pitchak, Yu.F. Rodionov, V.V. Khmyzov, Yu.A. Yashin 19 Isotopic Dependence of Radiative Capture Cross-sections for 30 keV Neutrons (Pages 44-52 of Original) By Yu. N. Trof imov 25 Evaluation of Particle Emission Spectra for Isotopes of Chromium, Iron and Nickel for the BROND Data Library (Pages 53-66 of Original) By A.V. Zelenetskij , A.B. Pashchenko 33 Comparison of Measured and Calculated Cross-sections of a Large Number of Nuclides (Pages 67-79 of Original) By A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickel Isotope Variations in Terrestrial Silicate Rocks and Geological Reference Materials Measured by MC-ICP-MS
    09 Vol. 37 — N° 3 13 P.297 – 317 Nickel Isotope Variations in Terrestrial Silicate Rocks and Geological Reference Materials Measured by MC-ICP-MS Bleuenn Gueguen (1, 2)*,OlivierRouxel (1, 2), Emmanuel Ponzevera (2),AndreyBekker (3) and Yves Fouquet (2) (1) Institut Universitaire Europeen de la Mer, UMR 6538, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, BP 80, F-29280, Plouzane, France (2) IFREMER, Centre de Brest, UniteG eosciences Marines, 29280, Plouzane, France (3) Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, Canada * Corresponding author. e-mail: [email protected] Although initial studies have demonstrated the applica- Bien que les premieres etudes demontrent la pertinence bility of Ni isotopes for cosmochemistry and as a potential des isotopes du nickel en cosmochimie et en tant que biosignature, the Ni isotope composition of terrestrial signature biologique, la composition isotopique du nickel igneous and sedimentary rocks, and ore deposits remains des roches ignees et sedimentaires terrestres ainsi que poorly known. Our contribution is fourfold: (a) to detail an celle des dep ots^ de minerais est encore tres peu connue. analytical procedure for Ni isotope determination, (b) to Notre contribution s’organise en quatre axes, (a) detailler determine the Ni isotope composition of various geo- la procedure analytique pour la determination des logical reference materials, (c) to assess the isotope compositions isotopiques en nickel, (b) determiner la composition of the Bulk Silicate Earth relative to the Ni composition isotopique de materiaux geologiques de isotope reference material NIST SRM 986 and (d) to ref erence varies, (c) estimer la composition isotopique de report the range of mass-dependent Ni isotope fractio- la Terre Silicatee Globale (BSE) par rapport au standard nations in magmatic rocks and ore deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Endf-201 Enof/B-Vi Summary Documentation
    BNL-NCS—1754Z DE92 010079 ENDF-201 ENOF/B-VI SUMMARY DOCUMENTATION Compiled and Edited by P.F. Rose Brookhaven National Laboratory October 1991 NATIONAL NUCLEAR DATA CENTER BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, INC. UPTON, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11973 ft UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-76CH00016 WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY »'•'—••-.-*>„.,, DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. Printed in the United States of America Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 NTIS price codes:
    [Show full text]
  • Module01 Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory
    Module I Nuclear physics and reactor theory International Atomic Energy Agency, May 2015 v1.0 Background In 1991, the General Conference (GC) in its resolution RES/552 requested the Director General to prepare 'a comprehensive proposal for education and training in both radiation protection and in nuclear safety' for consideration by the following GC in 1992. In 1992, the proposal was made by the Secretariat and after considering this proposal the General Conference requested the Director General to prepare a report on a possible programme of activities on education and training in radiological protection and nuclear safety in its resolution RES1584. In response to this request and as a first step, the Secretariat prepared a Standard Syllabus for the Post- graduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection. Subsequently, planning of specialised training courses and workshops in different areas of Standard Syllabus were also made. A similar approach was taken to develop basic professional training in nuclear safety. In January 1997, Programme Performance Assessment System (PPAS) recommended the preparation of a standard syllabus for nuclear safety based on Agency Safely Standard Series Documents and any other internationally accepted practices. A draft Standard Syllabus for Basic Professional Training Course in Nuclear Safety (BPTC) was prepared by a group of consultants in November 1997 and the syllabus was finalised in July 1998 in the second consultants meeting. The Basic Professional Training Course on Nuclear Safety was offered for the first time at the end of 1999, in English, in Saclay, France, in cooperation with Institut National des Sciences et Techniques Nucleaires/Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (INSTN/CEA).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Nov 03 Physicsandmathstutor.Com
    PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com Nuclear 90 8. Strontium- 90 (38Sr ) is radioactive and emits α-particles. Which equation could represent this nuclear decay? May 02 1. Which set of radioactive emissions corresponds to the descriptions given in the table headings? 9. Protons and neutrons are thought to consist of smaller particles called quarks. The ‘up’ quark has a charge of 2/3 e : a ‘down’ quark has a charge of – 1/3 e, where e is the elementary charge (+1.6 x 10–19 C). How many up quarks and down quarks must a proton contain? 2. The nucleus of one of the isotopes of nickel is represented by 60 28 Ni . Which line in the table correctly describes a neutral atom of this isotope? Nov 03 10. Which are the correct descriptions of a γ-ray and a α-particle? x 3. A nucleus of bohrium yBh decays to mendelevium by a sequence of three α-particle emissions. 11. A certain nuclide, Uranium-235, has nucleon number 235, proton number 92 and neutron number 143. Data on four other nuclides are given below. Which is an isotope of Uranium-235? How many neutrons are there in a nucleus of Bh? A 267 B 261 C 160 D 154 Nov 02 4. The numbers of protons, neutrons and nucleons in three nuclei are shown. 59 12. A nickel nucleus 28Ni can be transformed by a process termed K-capture. In this process the nucleus absorbs an orbital electron. If no other process is involved, what is the resulting nucleus? Which nuclei are isotopes of the same element? June 04 241 A X and Y B X and Z C Y and Z D none of them 13.
    [Show full text]