DOCSLIB.ORG

Mass-Producing B Mesons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

resolved definitively. MACHOs (MAssive Compact Halo quark) has emerged from the detec­ The relative deficit of muon to Objects) have seen nothing so far, tors ARGUS (at the DORIS ring, electron atmospheric neutrinos but only a small fraction of the data DESY, Hamburg) and CLEO (at the observed by the Kamiokande and has been analysed. A new genera­ Cornell CESR ring) as well as from 1MB collaborations is confirmed by tion of cryogenic detectors should CERN's LEP electron-positron recent data from Soudan II experi­ soon be able to probe the region collider and the proton-antiproton ment, albeit with large uncertainties. predicted for a supersymmetric dark colliders at CERN and Fermilab. While the Kamiokande results are matter candidate - the lightest But the mosj challenging goal of consistent with neutrino oscillations, neutralino. this physics is to explore the mystery 1MB collaboration does not make Gravitation sessions concentrated of CP violation, so far only seen in such a claim, due to much larger mainly on current tests of the equiva­ neutral kaon decays. This subtle systematic uncertainties (attributed lence principle, and the theoretical mechanism - a disregard for the mostly to simulations). significance of this effort. A special combined symmetry of particle- An experiment at a test beam at the section reviewed the development of antiparticle switching and left-right Japanese KEK Laboratory is being the STEP project for a satellite test of reflection - possibly moulded the set up in a joint IMB-Kamiokande the principle. Theoretical talks under­ evolution of the Universe after the effort using a 1-kiloton water lined the challenge of measuring the Big Bang, providing a world domi­ Cherenkov detector. This should extremely small effects of any such nated by matter, rather than one provide important information about violation. where matter and antimatter play electron-muon separation at low Covering such a wide range of comparable roles. energies, crucial for correct interpre­ different but interrelated areas of To fully explore CP violation in the tation of the Kamiokande and 1MB physics was a challenge. However in laboratory needs a dedicated ma­ data. the informal Moriond atmosphere chine - a particle 'factory' - to mass The Moscow-Heidelberg group participants could ask even 'elemen­ produce B mesons. Only when this searching for neutrinoless double tary' questions, increasing the scope, full picture of CP violation has been beta decay of germanium-76 using as well as the depth, of their physics revealed will physicists finally be able an enriched sample detector now knowledge. to solve its mysteries. has, as reported by Piepke, a lower The workshop was organized by As well as major proposals in the limit on the isotope lifetime of 1.6 x J. Tran Thanh Van and his col­ US and Japan, several ideas have 1024 yrs, implying an upper limit on a leagues with the financial support been launched in Europe. Over the Majorana mass of the electron from CNRS, CEA, NSF and the years, many working groups have neutrino of 1.2-1.4 eV (a Majorana Observatoire de Paris. accumulated an impressive amount particle is its own antiparticle - a of data and knowledge on the phys­ Dirac particle has a distinct antiparti­ Information from T.J. Bowles and ics as well as on the machine and cle). P.S. Joshi detectors. Although an excess of events below The spearheads of experimental B the endpoint is seen, the shape of physics are the ARGUS and CLEO the electron spectrum rules out Mass-producing B collaborations. Highlights include the Majoron emission for a Majoron- determination of the parameters of neutrino coupling greater than 1.8 x mesons the (Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa, 10~4. This makes it rather unlikely that CKM) quark mixing matrix, testing the excess of events in other experi­ Since the discovery of the upsilon the consistency of the Standard ments is due to Majorons. resonances in 1977 the physics of Model with six quarks and three Dark matter was covered by Larry the fifth quark - beauty - has played a leptons, and giving the first indirect Krauss and David Caldwell. The vital role in establishing and consoli­ hint that the as yet unseen sixth COBE and IRAS satellite data is best dating today's Standard Model of ('top') quark is very heavy, together fitted by a mix of hot and cold dark particle physics. with initial indications of how it should matter containing 30% of 7 eV (tau?) In recent years, a wealth of data on decay. neutrinos. Two groups searching for B particle (containing the beauty Valuable complementary informa- 16 CERN Courier, June 1993 A recent sighting at the Aleph experiment at CERN's LEP electron-positron collider was this beautiful fully reconstructed formation of a Bs meson and its subsequent decay into a psi prime (subsequently giving a muon pair) and a phi meson (giving a kaon pair). The Bs mass is 5.3746 GeV, in accord with theoretical predictions. tion has come from proton-antiproton violation in kaon decays to constrain on charmed particles, and in the collider data and particularly from the the Standard Model. However, there limiting case of an infinitely heavy LEP experiments at the Z resonance. are still large uncertainties, especially quark system, both of which have Experiments at LEP have measured the top quark mass, which to the best been studied by lattice techniques. average and individual lifetimes of of our knowledge is somewhere These methods are well on their way the various B hadron species as well between 91 and 180 GeV. to providing fully quantitative predic­ as the weak neutral current proper­ Top quark particles will hopefully tions for many aspects of B decays. ties of the b quark, while both elec­ soon be found at Fermilab's Tevatron Awaiting experimental determina­ tron-positron and proton-antiproton collider. However determination of tion of several important quark studies have been able to establish a the various quark couplings and form couplings, recent measurements of significant signal for neutral B mixing. factors needs a reliable theoretical the Ds meson (strange antiquark and The Bs-meson (containing a strange framework. Here lattice gauge theory charmed quark) by the WA75 col­ antiquark and a b quark) and calculations are promising. Although laboration at CERN provide a useful lambda-b baryon have been seen by the present lattice-volumes are not check on a number of theoretical experiments at CERN. sufficient to simulate B physics models and strengthen confidence in B physics information can be directly, reliable methods have been lattice results. combined with results from CP developed in extrapolating the results To match the precision and reach of CERN Courier, June 1993 17 experiments at a B factory needs mesorrs to transform into each other further development of theoretical provide another possibility, while the Physics and tools. A particular goal is to perfect interference of this effect with direct the lattice techniques needed to B decay gives a third. In the Stand­ astrophysics of quark- compute B decays with a precision of ard Model, this latter class might gluon plasma 10% or better. exhibit large CP violating effects, In the same vein, the discovery of much larger than those seen in kaon heavy quark symmetry by Isgur and decays. The quark gluon plasma - matter Wise in 1989 and its subsequent While the bulk of analysis so far too hot or dense for quarks to crystal­ consolidation has opened up reliable uses a Standard Model context, B lize into particles - played a vital role predictions for B decays. This ap­ decays also provide a scenario for in the formation of the Universe. proach exploits the big difference physics beyond the Standard Model. Efforts to recreate and understand between quark masses, revealing With high production rates for tau this type of matter are forefront powerful symmetries in heavy quark leptons, a B factory will allow physics and astrophysics, and systems which facilitate computa­ searches for many decays at levels progress was highlighted in the tions. The approach has already paid at least two orders of magnitude Second International Conference on handsome dividends, but data from B more sensitive than present limits. Physics and Astrophysics of Quark factory experiments would increase The wide diversity of B decay Gluon Plasma (ICPA-QGP 93), held its usefulness. channels needs to be exploited to in Calcutta from 19-23 January. (The Flavour changing neutral current improve our understanding of weak first conference in the series was transitions in B decays creep in as decays. Present measurements and held in Bombay in February 1988). higher order (rare) processes and are theoretical analyses support the Although primarily motivated to­ dominated by virtual top quark Standard Model, but consistency is wards enlightening the Indian physics contributions. Measurements would not yet complete. Experiments at a B community in this new and rapidly provide valuable constraints on the meson factory will pin this down. evolving area, in which India now top quark mass and its inter-quark In particular, the possibility of plays an important role, the confer­ couplings. The recent observation by observing CP violation in B decays is ence also catered for an international the CLEO collaboration at Cornell's an outstanding opportunity to finally audience. Particular emphasis was CESR electron-positron collider of get to grips with a fundamental placed on the role of quark gluon the decay of a B meson into a K* and physical phenomenon vital to our plasma in astrophysics and cosmol­ a photon provides a good check of understanding of the evolution of ogy. the strength of so-called 'penguin' universe. While Charles Alcock of Lawrence processes (see page 1 ) and opens a Last but not least, there is the Livermore looked at a less conven­ new chapter in the study of weak general dissatisfaction with the tional picture giving inhomogeneous decays.
Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles

    The Five Common Particles

    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
  • (Anti)Proton Mass and Magnetic Moment

    (Anti)Proton Mass and Magnetic Moment

    FFK Conference 2019, Tihany, Hungary Precision measurements of the (anti)proton mass and magnetic moment Wolfgang Quint GSI Darmstadt and University of Heidelberg on behalf of the BASE collaboration spokesperson: Stefan Ulmer 2019 / 06 / 12 BASE – Collaboration • Mainz: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton, implementation of new technologies. • CERN Antiproton Decelerator: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton and proton/antiproton q/m ratio • Hannover/PTB: Laser cooling project, new technologies Institutes: RIKEN, MPI-K, CERN, University of Mainz, Tokyo University, GSI Darmstadt, University of Hannover, PTB Braunschweig C. Smorra et al., EPJ-Special Topics, The BASE Experiment, (2015) WE HAVE A PROBLEM mechanism which created the obvious baryon/antibaryon asymmetry in the Universe is not understood One strategy: Compare the fundamental properties of matter / antimatter conjugates with ultra-high precision CPT tests based on particle/antiparticle comparisons R.S. Van Dyck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 26 (1987). Recent B. Schwingenheuer, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4376 (1995). Past CERN H. Dehmelt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 4694 (1999). G. W. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. D 73 , 072003 (2006). Planned M. Hori et al., Nature 475 , 485 (2011). ALICE G. Gabriesle et al., PRL 82 , 3199(1999). J. DiSciacca et al., PRL 110 , 130801 (2013). S. Ulmer et al., Nature 524 , 196-200 (2015). ALICE Collaboration, Nature Physics 11 , 811–814 (2015). M. Hori et al., Science 354 , 610 (2016). H. Nagahama et al., Nat. Comm. 8, 14084 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 541 , 506 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 586 , doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0017 (2018).
  • Fundamentals of Particle Physics

    Fundamentals of Particle Physics

    Fundamentals of Par0cle Physics Particle Physics Masterclass Emmanuel Olaiya 1 The Universe u The universe is 15 billion years old u Around 150 billion galaxies (150,000,000,000) u Each galaxy has around 300 billion stars (300,000,000,000) u 150 billion x 300 billion stars (that is a lot of stars!) u That is a huge amount of material u That is an unimaginable amount of particles u How do we even begin to understand all of matter? 2 How many elementary particles does it take to describe the matter around us? 3 We can describe the material around us using just 3 particles . 3 Matter Particles +2/3 U Point like elementary particles that protons and neutrons are made from. Quarks Hence we can construct all nuclei using these two particles -1/3 d -1 Electrons orbit the nuclei and are help to e form molecules. These are also point like elementary particles Leptons We can build the world around us with these 3 particles. But how do they interact. To understand their interactions we have to introduce forces! Force carriers g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 The gluon, of which there are 8 is the force carrier for nuclear forces Consider 2 forces: nuclear forces, and electromagnetism The photon, ie light is the force carrier when experiencing forces such and electricity and magnetism γ SOME FAMILAR THE ATOM PARTICLES ≈10-10m electron (-) 0.511 MeV A Fundamental (“pointlike”) Particle THE NUCLEUS proton (+) 938.3 MeV neutron (0) 939.6 MeV E=mc2. Einstein’s equation tells us mass and energy are equivalent Wave/Particle Duality (Quantum Mechanics) Einstein E
  • Interactions of Antiprotons with Atoms and Molecules

    Interactions of Antiprotons with Atoms and Molecules

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Department of Energy Publications U.S. Department of Energy 1988 INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES Mitio Inokuti Argonne National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons Inokuti, Mitio, "INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES" (1988). US Department of Energy Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Energy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Department of Energy Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. /'Iud Tracks Radial. Meas., Vol. 16, No. 2/3, pp. 115-123, 1989 0735-245X/89 $3.00 + 0.00 Inl. J. Radial. Appl .. Ins/rum., Part D Pergamon Press pic printed in Great Bntam INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES* Mmo INOKUTI Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A. (Received 14 November 1988) Abstract-Antiproton beams of relatively low energies (below hundreds of MeV) have recently become available. The present article discusses the significance of those beams in the contexts of radiation physics and of atomic and molecular physics. Studies on individual collisions of antiprotons with atoms and molecules are valuable for a better understanding of collisions of protons or electrons, a subject with many applications. An antiproton is unique as' a stable, negative heavy particle without electronic structure, and it provides an excellent opportunity to study atomic collision theory.
  • Lepton Flavor and Number Conservation, and Physics Beyond the Standard Model

    Lepton Flavor and Number Conservation, and Physics Beyond the Standard Model

    Lepton Flavor and Number Conservation, and Physics Beyond the Standard Model Andr´ede Gouv^ea1 and Petr Vogel2 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60208, USA 2 Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA April 1, 2013 Abstract The physics responsible for neutrino masses and lepton mixing remains unknown. More ex- perimental data are needed to constrain and guide possible generalizations of the standard model of particle physics, and reveal the mechanism behind nonzero neutrino masses. Here, the physics associated with searches for the violation of lepton-flavor conservation in charged-lepton processes and the violation of lepton-number conservation in nuclear physics processes is summarized. In the first part, several aspects of charged-lepton flavor violation are discussed, especially its sensitivity to new particles and interactions beyond the standard model of particle physics. The discussion concentrates mostly on rare processes involving muons and electrons. In the second part, the sta- tus of the conservation of total lepton number is discussed. The discussion here concentrates on current and future probes of this apparent law of Nature via searches for neutrinoless double beta decay, which is also the most sensitive probe of the potential Majorana nature of neutrinos. arXiv:1303.4097v2 [hep-ph] 29 Mar 2013 1 1 Introduction In the absence of interactions that lead to nonzero neutrino masses, the Standard Model Lagrangian is invariant under global U(1)e × U(1)µ × U(1)τ rotations of the lepton fields. In other words, if neutrinos are massless, individual lepton-flavor numbers { electron-number, muon-number, and tau-number { are expected to be conserved.
  • BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = Sb, Bs = S B, Similarly for Bs ’S

    BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = Sb, Bs = S B, Similarly for Bs ’S

    Citation: P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020) BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = sb, Bs = s b, similarly for Bs ’s 0 P − Bs I (J ) = 0(0 ) I , J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions. Mass m 0 = 5366.88 ± 0.14 MeV Bs m 0 − mB = 87.38 ± 0.16 MeV Bs Mean life τ = (1.515 ± 0.004) × 10−12 s cτ = 454.2 µm 12 −1 ∆Γ 0 = Γ 0 − Γ 0 = (0.085 ± 0.004) × 10 s Bs BsL Bs H 0 0 Bs -Bs mixing parameters 12 −1 ∆m 0 = m 0 – m 0 = (17.749 ± 0.020) × 10 ¯h s Bs Bs H BsL = (1.1683 ± 0.0013) × 10−8 MeV xs = ∆m 0 /Γ 0 = 26.89 ± 0.07 Bs Bs χs = 0.499312 ± 0.000004 0 CP violation parameters in Bs 2 −3 Re(ǫ 0 )/(1+ ǫ 0 )=(−0.15 ± 0.70) × 10 Bs Bs 0 + − CKK (Bs → K K )=0.14 ± 0.11 0 + − SKK (Bs → K K )=0.30 ± 0.13 0 ∓ ± +0.10 rB(Bs → Ds K )=0.37−0.09 0 ± ∓ ◦ δB(Bs → Ds K ) = (358 ± 14) −2 CP Violation phase βs = (2.55 ± 1.15) × 10 rad λ (B0 → J/ψ(1S)φ)=1.012 ± 0.017 s λ = 0.999 ± 0.017 A, CP violation parameter = −0.75 ± 0.12 C, CP violation parameter = 0.19 ± 0.06 S, CP violation parameter = 0.17 ± 0.06 L ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.06 k ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) )=0.17 ± 0.15 ⊥ ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.10 + − ACP (Bs → π K ) = 0.221 ± 0.015 0 + − ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → [K K ]D K (892) ) = −0.04 ± 0.07 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page1 Created:6/1/202008:28 Citation: P.A.
  • Muon Decay 1

    Muon Decay 1

    Muon Decay 1 LIFETIME OF THE MUON Introduction Muons are unstable particles; otherwise, they are rather like electrons but with much higher masses, approximately 105 MeV. Radioactive nuclear decays do not release enough energy to produce them; however, they are readily available in the laboratory as the dominant component of the cosmic ray flux at the earth’s surface. There are two types of muons, with opposite charge, and they decay into electrons or positrons and two neutrinos according to the rules + + µ → e νe ν¯µ − − µ → e ν¯e νµ . The muon decay is a radioactiveprocess which follows the usual exponential law for the probability of survival for a given time t. Be sure that you understand the basis for this law. The goal of the experiment is to measure the muon lifetime which is roughly 2 µs. With care you can make the measurement with an accuracy of a few percent or better. In order to achieve this goal in a conceptually simple way, we look only at those muons that happen to come to rest inside our detector. That is, we first capture a muon and then measure the elapsed time until it decays. Muons are rather penetrating particles, they can easily go through meters of concrete. Nevertheless, a small fraction of the muons will be slowed down and stopped in the detector. As shown in Figure 1, the apparatus consists of two types of detectors. There is a tank filled with liquid scintillator (a big metal box) viewed by two photomultiplier tubes (Left and Right) and two plastic scintillation counters (flat panels wrapped in black tape), each viewed by a photomul- tiplier tube (Top and Bottom).
  • 1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

    1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

    PRINCIPLES OF POSITRON ANNIHILATION Chapter-1 __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.1. Introduction The phenomenon of positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) has been utilized as nuclear method to probe a variety of material properties as well as to research problems in solid state physics. The field of solid state investigation with positrons started in the early fifties, when it was recognized that information could be obtained about the properties of solids by studying the annihilation of a positron and an electron as given by Dumond et al. [1] and Bendetti and Roichings [2]. In particular, the discovery of the interaction of positrons with defects in crystal solids by Mckenize et al. [3] has given a strong impetus to a further elaboration of the PAS. Currently, PAS is amongst the best nuclear methods, and its most recent developments are documented in the proceedings of the latest positron annihilation conferences [4-8]. PAS is successfully applied for the investigation of electron characteristics and defect structures present in materials, magnetic structures of solids, plastic deformation at low and high temperature, and phase transformations in alloys, semiconductors, polymers, porous material, etc. Its applications extend from advanced problems of solid state physics and materials science to industrial use. It is also widely used in chemistry, biology, and medicine (e.g. locating tumors). As the process of measurement does not mostly influence the properties of the investigated sample, PAS is a non-destructive testing approach that allows the subsequent study of a sample by other methods. As experimental equipment for many applications, PAS is commercially produced and is relatively cheap, thus, increasingly more research laboratories are using PAS for basic research, diagnostics of machine parts working in hard conditions, and for characterization of high-tech materials.
  • Muon Bundles As a Sign of Strangelets from the Universe

    Muon Bundles As a Sign of Strangelets from the Universe

    Draft version October 19, 2018 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 MUON BUNDLES AS A SIGN OF STRANGELETS FROM THE UNIVERSE P. Kankiewicz,1 M. Rybczynski,´ 1 Z. W lodarczyk,1 and G. Wilk2 1Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-406 Kielce, Poland 2National Centre for Nuclear Research, Department of Fundamental Research, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Recently the CERN ALICE experiment, in its dedicated cosmic ray run, observed muon bundles of very high multiplicities, thereby confirming similar findings from the LEP era at CERN (in the CosmoLEP project). Originally it was argued that they apparently stem from the primary cosmic rays with a heavy masses. We propose an alternative possibility arguing that muonic bundles of highest multiplicity are produced by strangelets, hypothetical stable lumps of strange quark matter infiltrating our Universe. We also address the possibility of additionally deducing their directionality which could be of astrophysical interest. Significant evidence for anisotropy of arrival directions of the observed high multiplicity muonic bundles is found. Estimated directionality suggests their possible extragalactic provenance. Keywords: astroparticle physics: cosmic rays: reference systems arXiv:1612.04749v2 [hep-ph] 17 Mar 2017 Corresponding author: M. Rybczy´nski [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Kankiewicz et al. 1. INTRODUCTION Cosmic ray physics is our unique source of information on events in the energy range which will never be accessible in Earth-bound experiments Dar & De Rujula(2008); Letessier-Selvon & Stanev(2011). This is why one of the most important aspects of their investigation is the understanding of the primary cosmic ray (CR) flux and its composition.
  • Trigger and Data Acquisition

    Trigger and Data Acquisition

    Trigger and data acquisition N. Ellis CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The lectures address some of the issues of triggering and data acquisition in large high-energy physics experiments. Emphasis is placed on hadron-collider experiments that present a particularly challenging environment for event se- lection and data collection. However, the lectures also explain how T/DAQ systems have evolved over the years to meet new challenges. Some examples are given from early experience with LHC T/DAQ systems during the 2008 single-beam operations. 1 Introduction These lectures concentrate on experiments at high-energy particle colliders, especially the general- purpose experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1]. These experiments represent a very chal- lenging case that illustrates well the problems that have to be addressed in state-of-the-art high-energy physics (HEP) trigger and data-acquisition (T/DAQ) systems. This is also the area in which the author is working (on the trigger for the ATLAS experiment at LHC) and so is the example that he knows best. However, the lectures start with a more general discussion, building up to some examples from LEP [2] that had complementary challenges to those of the LHC. The LEP examples are a good reference point to see how HEP T/DAQ systems have evolved in the last few years. Students at this school come from various backgrounds — phenomenology, experimental data analysis in running experiments, and preparing for future experiments (including working on T/DAQ systems in some cases). These lectures try to strike a balance between making the presentation accessi- ble to all, and going into some details for those already familiar with T/DAQ systems.
  • ANTIPROTON and NEUTRINO PRODUCTION ACCELERATOR TIMELINE ISSUES Dave Mcginnis August 28, 2005

    ANTIPROTON and NEUTRINO PRODUCTION ACCELERATOR TIMELINE ISSUES Dave Mcginnis August 28, 2005

    ANTIPROTON AND NEUTRINO PRODUCTION ACCELERATOR TIMELINE ISSUES Dave McGinnis August 28, 2005 INTRODUCTION Most of the accelerator operating period is devoted to making antiprotons for the Collider program and accelerating protons for the NUMI program. While stacking antiprotons, the same Main Injector 120 GeV acceleration cycle is used to accelerate protons bound for the antiproton production target and protons bound for the NUMI neutrino production target. This is designated as Mixed-Mode operations. The minimum cycle time is limited by the time it takes to fill the Main Injector with two Booster batches for antiproton production and five Booster batches for neutrino production (7 x 0.067 seconds) and the Main Injector ramp rate (~ 1.5 seconds). As the antiproton stack size grows, the Accumulator stochastic cooling systems slow down which requires the cycle time to be lengthened. The lengthening of the cycle time unfortunately reduces the NUMI neutrino flux. This paper will use a simple antiproton stacking model to explore some of the tradeoffs between antiproton stacking and neutrino production. ACCUMULATOR STACKTAIL SYSTEM After the target, antiprotons are injected into the Debuncher ring where they undergo a bunch rotation and are stochastically pre-cooled for injection into the Accumulator. A fresh beam pulse injected into the Accumulator from the Debuncher is merged with previous beam pulses with the Accumulator StackTail system. This system cools and decelerates the antiprotons until the antiprotons are captured by the core cooling systems as shown in Figure 1. The antiproton flux through the Stacktail system is described by the Fokker –Plank equation ∂ψ ∂φ = − (1) ∂t ∂E where φ the flux of particles passing through the energy E and ψ is the particle density of the beam at energy E.
  • J. Stroth Asked the Question: "Which Are the Experimental Evidences for a Long Mean Free Path of Phi Mesons in Medium?"

    J. Stroth Asked the Question: "Which Are the Experimental Evidences for a Long Mean Free Path of Phi Mesons in Medium?"

    J. Stroth asked the question: "Which are the experimental evidences for a long mean free path of phi mesons in medium?" Answer by H. Stroebele ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (based on the study of several publications on phi production and information provided by the theory friends of H. Stöcker ) Before trying to find an answer to this question, we need to specify what is meant with "long". The in medium cross section is equivalent to the mean free path. Thus we need to find out whether the (in medium) cross section is large (with respect to what?). The reference would be the cross sections of other mesons like pions or more specifically the omega meson. There is a further reference, namely the suppression of phi production and decay described in the OZI rule. A “blind” application of the OZI rule would give a cross section of the phi three orders of magnitude lower than that of the omega meson and correspondingly a "long" free mean path. In the following we shall look at the phi production cross sections in photon+p, pion+p, and p+p interactions. The total photoproduction cross sections of phi and omega mesons were measured in a bubble chamber experiment (J. Ballam et al., Phys. Rev. D 7, 3150, 1973), in which a cross section ratio of R(omega/phi) = 10 was found in the few GeV beam energy region. There are results on omega and phi production in p+p interactions available from SPESIII (Near- Threshold Production of omega mesons in the Reaction p p → p p omega", Phys.Rev.Lett.