DOCSLIB.ORG

ANTIMATTER a Review of Its Role in the Universe and Its Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANTIMATTER a Review of Its Role in the Universe and Its Applications A review of its role in the ANTIMATTER universe and its applications THE DISCOVERY OF NATURE’S SYMMETRIES ntimatter plays an intrinsic role in our Aunderstanding of the subatomic world THE UNIVERSE THROUGH THE LOOKING-GLASS C.D. Anderson, Anderson, Emilio VisualSegrè Archives C.D. The beginning of the 20th century or vice versa, it absorbed or emitted saw a cascade of brilliant insights into quanta of electromagnetic radiation the nature of matter and energy. The of definite energy, giving rise to a first was Max Planck’s realisation that characteristic spectrum of bright or energy (in the form of electromagnetic dark lines at specific wavelengths. radiation i.e. light) had discrete values The Austrian physicist, Erwin – it was quantised. The second was Schrödinger laid down a more precise that energy and mass were equivalent, mathematical formulation of this as described by Einstein’s special behaviour based on wave theory and theory of relativity and his iconic probability – quantum mechanics. The first image of a positron track found in cosmic rays equation, E = mc2, where c is the The Schrödinger wave equation could speed of light in a vacuum; the theory predict the spectrum of the simplest or positron; when an electron also predicted that objects behave atom, hydrogen, which consists of met a positron, they would annihilate somewhat differently when moving a single electron orbiting a positive according to Einstein’s equation, proton. However, the spectrum generating two gamma rays in the featured additional lines that were not process. The concept of antimatter explained. In 1928, the British physicist was born. Paul Dirac realised that because the electron was very light and moved very THE IMPORTANCE OF DIRAC’S IDEAS quickly, special relativity needed to Today, it is accepted that all subatomic Paul Dirac's equation of quantum mechanics (right) be incorporated into the equation to particles can have a “mirror” or predicted the existence of antimatter explain this fine structure. antimatter counterpart with opposite with velocities close to the speed Dirac produced a more complicated charge and right- or left-handed spin. of light. The third was Niels Bohr’s wave equation that revealed the Furthermore, our understanding of ground-breaking description of matter electron’s true character. First, it particles and forces – the fundamental as composed of atoms consisting predicted that electrons had spin, building blocks of the universe – is built of lightweight, negatively charged which could be right- or left-handed. on these kinds of mirror symmetries, electrons orbiting a central, positively The second, more bizarre characteristic which are reflected in the powerful charged nucleus. The key feature of the was that the electron could have a mathematical framework of quantum model was that the electrons occupied range of negative as well as positive mechanics. The concept of symmetry is a series of energy levels or quantum energies. This suggested that this now used throughout physics to explain states. When an electron jumped from concept predicted the existence of a and classify phenomena. a lower quantum state to a higher one positively charged electron – Another important idea to emerge 2 Antimatter | A review of its role in the universe and its applications THE UK ROLE The UK has always been a world-leader in particle physics. It has participated in most of the major international experiments involving antimatter, particularly through its membership The first detection in 1983 of a carrier of the weak force, the Z particle, in CERN's ground-breaking proton–antiproton collider (the Super Proton Synchrotron), which was later superseded by the Large of CERN. The UK has invested in Electron–Positron collider, LEP (top right) technologies for future collider designs and experiments. It plans to become an Associate Member of FAIR. from Dirac’s equation is that the from its momentum and negative vacuum is not empty space but a charge, and show that it annihilated sea of virtual particles. According to in a characteristic way when it hit a quantum probability, particles can proton or neutron in ordinary matter. pop in and out of existence, allowing particle–antiparticle pairs to be THE ROLE OF ANTIMATTER IN generated from the vacuum according PARTICLE PHYSICS to Einstein’s equation. Experiments employing or generating antimatter particles have played a key role in formulating ideas about The high-energy FAIR facility in Germany will generate THE DISCOVERY OF ANTIPARTICLES intense antiproton beams for many experiments The existence of positrons was the fundamental particles and confirmed when they were discovered forces. Particle collisions at very composed of the two lightest quarks. in cosmic rays using a cloud chamber, high energies may generate particle– Each particle has an antimatter in 1932 by Carl Anderson at the antiparticle pairs, which provide partner. The four fundamental forces, California Institute of Technology. information about the characteristics the electromagnetic force, strong Then in 1955, a team led by Owen of the elementary units of which the and weak forces, and gravity, are Chamberlain and Emilio Segrè at the universe is composed. also described as being mediated by University of California at Berkeley Europe’s main particle physics particles, known as bosons (although uncovered the antiproton using a new research laboratory, CERN in Geneva, gravity is still not incorporated into the type of accelerator called the Bevatron. as well as laboratories in the US, used Standard Model). They were able to identify the particle beams of antiparticles to confirm the In the 1980s, experiments at so-called Standard Model of Particle CERN colliding beams of protons and Physics. In this quantum-based antiprotons confirmed the existence of picture, matter encompasses six types W and Z bosons, which carry the weak - of lightweight particles: the electron, force. These new particles were later π the muon and tau lepton, together studied throughout the 1990s using with their corresponding neutrinos; the Large Electron–Positron collider, η π + and also six heavy particles called LEP. A new electron-positron collider quarks: up, down, strange, charm, is being planned to probe the Higgs- π + bottom and top (in order of increasing boson-like particle that has now been π o - μ mass). Protons and neutrons are discovered in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. γ γ Another high-energy project at Darmstadt in Germany, FAIR (Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research), will μ + e- υ υ e- use high-intensity antiproton beams to investigate the strong force, and how matter first formed and evolved in + the universe. e e+ 3 NATURE’S SYMMETRIES BROKEN? e live in a universe made mostly Wof matter, so where did all the antimatter go? LOST WORLDS OF ANTIMATTER Physicists now believe that the particles “right- or left-handedness”; Universe was born some 13.75 billion and the reversibility of their behaviour years ago in a unified high-energy state in time (T) – the film of a particle that rapidly expanded and cooled, interaction looks the same whether run coalescing into the matter and force forwards or backwards. Particles and carriers responsible for our existence. their antiparticles with opposite charge Matter and antimatter particles and handedness should behave in the should have been created in equal same way, that is – symmetrically. numbers and should have annihilated. To search for any asymmetry, Somehow, some matter – but no researchers probe C, P and T, either antimatter – survived; observations separately or combined (CP or CPT), indicate that all the stars and galaxies by comparing how particles and their we see are made of the same version anti-versions behave. of matter as our own solar system The CPLEAR experiment at CERN investigated the and ourselves. CP mirror "breaking" of the CP mirror (CP-violation) in the Theoretical physicists think that early 1990s, using particles called kaons an imbalance between particles and decays of exotic composite particles antiparticles must have developed known as neutral kaons (K0). These during the primordial expansion, and consist of a down quark and a strange that there must be some inherent quark (p3) but exist in two forms that asymmetrical difference in the are each “quantum mixtures” of both behaviour of matter and antimatter the matter and antimatter versions. that favoured the survival of matter. The two forms decay at different rates, However, no one is sure what those + - and are known as K-long and K-short. processes were and how they Tiny discrepancies in their decay worked. Identifying subtle effects patterns indicated that the constituent associated with the matter–antimatter quarks and antiquarks were behaving asymmetry is now one of the main slightly differently in terms of their research areas in fundamental physics. Symmetry inherent in quantum mechanics shows parity, and were in fact “violating CP how the CP (charge–parity) "mirror" (a mathematical symmetry”. More precise experiments operation) reverses the basic attributes of SEARCHING FOR ASYMMETRY fundamental particles like electrons: the electric at CERN using the Low Energy As explained on p2, physicists classify charge transforms from negative to positive Antiproton Ring (LEAR) and at other the quantum properties of particles or vice-versa; and the direction of the particle's laboratories confirmed that CP and T according to various symmetries: in motion reverses with respect to the sense of its spin
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes: BCS Theory of Superconductivity
    Lecture Notes: BCS theory of superconductivity Prof. Rafael M. Fernandes Here we will discuss a new ground state of the interacting electron gas: the superconducting state. In this macroscopic quantum state, the electrons form coherent bound states called Cooper pairs, which dramatically change the macroscopic properties of the system, giving rise to perfect conductivity and perfect diamagnetism. We will mostly focus on conventional superconductors, where the Cooper pairs originate from a small attractive electron-electron interaction mediated by phonons. However, in the so- called unconventional superconductors - a topic of intense research in current solid state physics - the pairing can originate even from purely repulsive interactions. 1 Phenomenology Superconductivity was discovered by Kamerlingh-Onnes in 1911, when he was studying the transport properties of Hg (mercury) at low temperatures. He found that below the liquifying temperature of helium, at around 4:2 K, the resistivity of Hg would suddenly drop to zero. Although at the time there was not a well established model for the low-temperature behavior of transport in metals, the result was quite surprising, as the expectations were that the resistivity would either go to zero or diverge at T = 0, but not vanish at a finite temperature. In a metal the resistivity at low temperatures has a constant contribution from impurity scattering, a T 2 contribution from electron-electron scattering, and a T 5 contribution from phonon scattering. Thus, the vanishing of the resistivity at low temperatures is a clear indication of a new ground state. Another key property of the superconductor was discovered in 1933 by Meissner.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics College of Arts and Sciences Physics
    DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PHYSICS Faculty I. Major in Physics—38 hours William Nettles (2006). Professor of Physics, Department A. Physics 231-232, 311, 313, 314, 420, 424(1-3 Chair, and Associate Dean of the College of Arts and hours), 430, 498—28–30 hours Sciences. B.S., Mississippi College; M.S., and Ph.D., B. Select three or more courses: PHY 262, 325, 350, Vanderbilt University. 360, 395-6-7*, 400, 410, 417, 425 (1-2 hours**), 495* Ildefonso Guilaran (2008). Associate Professor of Physics. C. Prerequisites: MAT 211, 212, 213, 314 B.S., Western Kentucky University; M.S. and Ph.D., *Must be approved Special/Independent Studies Florida State University. **Maximum 3 hours from 424 and 425 apply to major. Geoffrey Poore (2010). Assistant Professor of Physics. B.A., II. Major in Physical Science—44 hours Wheaton College; M.S. and Ph.D., University of Illinois. A. CHE 111, 112, 113, 211, 221—15 hours David A. Ward (1992, 1999). Professor of Physics, B.S. B. PHY 112, 231-32, 311, 310 or 301—22 hours and M.A., University of South Florida; Ph.D., North C. Upper Level Electives from CHE and PHY—7 Carolina State University. hours; maximum 1 hour from 424 and 1 from 498 III. Minor in Physics—24 semester hours Staff Physics 231-232, 311, + 10 hours of Physics electives Christine Rowland (2006). Academic Secretary— except PHY 111, 112, 301, 310 Engineering, Physics, Math, and Computer Science. IV. Teacher Licensure in Physics (Grades 6–12) A. Complete the requirements shown above for the Physics or Physical Science major.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anti)Proton Mass and Magnetic Moment
    FFK Conference 2019, Tihany, Hungary Precision measurements of the (anti)proton mass and magnetic moment Wolfgang Quint GSI Darmstadt and University of Heidelberg on behalf of the BASE collaboration spokesperson: Stefan Ulmer 2019 / 06 / 12 BASE – Collaboration • Mainz: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton, implementation of new technologies. • CERN Antiproton Decelerator: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton and proton/antiproton q/m ratio • Hannover/PTB: Laser cooling project, new technologies Institutes: RIKEN, MPI-K, CERN, University of Mainz, Tokyo University, GSI Darmstadt, University of Hannover, PTB Braunschweig C. Smorra et al., EPJ-Special Topics, The BASE Experiment, (2015) WE HAVE A PROBLEM mechanism which created the obvious baryon/antibaryon asymmetry in the Universe is not understood One strategy: Compare the fundamental properties of matter / antimatter conjugates with ultra-high precision CPT tests based on particle/antiparticle comparisons R.S. Van Dyck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 26 (1987). Recent B. Schwingenheuer, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4376 (1995). Past CERN H. Dehmelt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 4694 (1999). G. W. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. D 73 , 072003 (2006). Planned M. Hori et al., Nature 475 , 485 (2011). ALICE G. Gabriesle et al., PRL 82 , 3199(1999). J. DiSciacca et al., PRL 110 , 130801 (2013). S. Ulmer et al., Nature 524 , 196-200 (2015). ALICE Collaboration, Nature Physics 11 , 811–814 (2015). M. Hori et al., Science 354 , 610 (2016). H. Nagahama et al., Nat. Comm. 8, 14084 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 541 , 506 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 586 , doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0017 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Particle Physics
    Fundamentals of Par0cle Physics Particle Physics Masterclass Emmanuel Olaiya 1 The Universe u The universe is 15 billion years old u Around 150 billion galaxies (150,000,000,000) u Each galaxy has around 300 billion stars (300,000,000,000) u 150 billion x 300 billion stars (that is a lot of stars!) u That is a huge amount of material u That is an unimaginable amount of particles u How do we even begin to understand all of matter? 2 How many elementary particles does it take to describe the matter around us? 3 We can describe the material around us using just 3 particles . 3 Matter Particles +2/3 U Point like elementary particles that protons and neutrons are made from. Quarks Hence we can construct all nuclei using these two particles -1/3 d -1 Electrons orbit the nuclei and are help to e form molecules. These are also point like elementary particles Leptons We can build the world around us with these 3 particles. But how do they interact. To understand their interactions we have to introduce forces! Force carriers g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 The gluon, of which there are 8 is the force carrier for nuclear forces Consider 2 forces: nuclear forces, and electromagnetism The photon, ie light is the force carrier when experiencing forces such and electricity and magnetism γ SOME FAMILAR THE ATOM PARTICLES ≈10-10m electron (-) 0.511 MeV A Fundamental (“pointlike”) Particle THE NUCLEUS proton (+) 938.3 MeV neutron (0) 939.6 MeV E=mc2. Einstein’s equation tells us mass and energy are equivalent Wave/Particle Duality (Quantum Mechanics) Einstein E
    [Show full text]
  • Sp0103 32-36 Gaughan
    Atomic Unique Atomic Spectroscopy Aims at Answering a Universal Question Richard Gaughan There is far more matter cover the detailed properties of the than antimatter in our antiproton. In 1930 Paul Dirac theoretically pre- universe, but scientists dicted the existence of these antimatter don’t know enough particles, which are the exact opposite of about the properties of common particles. The positron was ex- perimentally verified in 1932, while the antimatter to understand _ antiproton (p) was not observed until why. By spectroscopically 1955. Why did it take so long to experi- analyzing atoms created mentally identify the antiproton? One reason is that it is essentially nonexistent when antiprotons collide in our earthly environment, and it can with helium, physicists only be produced in particle accelerators at CERN are measuring more powerful than those required to produce positrons. the properties of The absence of antimatter was not a antimatter with subject of much concern until physicists unprecedented accuracy. began to improve our understanding of the origin of the universe. The early uni- verse, filled with dense energy, almost instantaneously expanded to the point where matter condensed from the initial PHOTODISC INCORPORATED PHOTODISC sea of energy. So where is the problem? e live in a universe con- The problem is that our current un- structed from atoms com- derstanding predicts that as the universe posed of light, negatively cooled, both matter and antimatter charged electrons orbiting should have been produced in roughly Wpositively charged protons and un- equivalent quantities. Something has to charged neutrons (both heavy). We account for the observed matter pre- know now that our universe could have dominance in today’s universe, and sci- been predominantly composed of anti- entists around the world are searching matter — atoms with light, positively for possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions of Antiprotons with Atoms and Molecules
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Department of Energy Publications U.S. Department of Energy 1988 INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES Mitio Inokuti Argonne National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons Inokuti, Mitio, "INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES" (1988). US Department of Energy Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Energy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Department of Energy Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. /'Iud Tracks Radial. Meas., Vol. 16, No. 2/3, pp. 115-123, 1989 0735-245X/89 $3.00 + 0.00 Inl. J. Radial. Appl .. Ins/rum., Part D Pergamon Press pic printed in Great Bntam INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES* Mmo INOKUTI Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A. (Received 14 November 1988) Abstract-Antiproton beams of relatively low energies (below hundreds of MeV) have recently become available. The present article discusses the significance of those beams in the contexts of radiation physics and of atomic and molecular physics. Studies on individual collisions of antiprotons with atoms and molecules are valuable for a better understanding of collisions of protons or electrons, a subject with many applications. An antiproton is unique as' a stable, negative heavy particle without electronic structure, and it provides an excellent opportunity to study atomic collision theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Confinement of Antihydrogen for 1000 Seconds
    Confinement of antihydrogen for 1000 seconds G.B. Andresen1, M.D. Ashkezari2, M. Baquero-Ruiz3, W. Bertsche4, E. Butler5, C.L. Cesar6, A. Deller4, S. Eriksson4, J. Fajans3#, T. Friesen7, M.C. Fujiwara8,7, D.R. Gill8, A. Gutierrez9, J.S. Hangst1, W.N. Hardy9, R.S. Hayano10, M.E. Hayden2, A.J. Humphries4, R. Hydomako7, S. Jonsell11, S. Kemp5§, L. Kurchaninov8, N. Madsen4, S. Menary12, P. Nolan13, K. Olchanski8, A. Olin8&, P. Pusa13, C.Ø. Rasmussen1, F. Robicheaux14, E. Sarid15, D.M. Silveira16, C. So3, J.W. Storey8$, R.I. Thompson7, D.P. van der Werf4, J.S. Wurtele3#, Y. Yamazaki16¶. 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. 2Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, V5A 1S6, Canada 3Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 4Department of Physics, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom 5Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland 6Instituto de Fısica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, T2N 1N4, Canada 8TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver BC, V6T 2A3, Canada 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada 10Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 11 Department of Physics, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden 12Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada 13Department of Physics,
    [Show full text]
  • The Superconductor-Metal Quantum Phase Transition in Ultra-Narrow Wires
    The superconductor-metal quantum phase transition in ultra-narrow wires Adissertationpresented by Adrian Giuseppe Del Maestro to The Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2008 c 2008 - Adrian Giuseppe Del Maestro ! All rights reserved. Thesis advisor Author Subir Sachdev Adrian Giuseppe Del Maestro The superconductor-metal quantum phase transition in ultra- narrow wires Abstract We present a complete description of a zero temperature phasetransitionbetween superconducting and diffusive metallic states in very thin wires due to a Cooper pair breaking mechanism originating from a number of possible sources. These include impurities localized to the surface of the wire, a magnetic field orientated parallel to the wire or, disorder in an unconventional superconductor. The order parameter describing pairing is strongly overdamped by its coupling toaneffectivelyinfinite bath of unpaired electrons imagined to reside in the transverse conduction channels of the wire. The dissipative critical theory thus contains current reducing fluctuations in the guise of both quantum and thermally activated phase slips. A full cross-over phase diagram is computed via an expansion in the inverse number of complex com- ponents of the superconducting order parameter (equal to oneinthephysicalcase). The fluctuation corrections to the electrical and thermal conductivities are deter- mined, and we find that the zero frequency electrical transport has a non-monotonic temperature dependence when moving from the quantum critical to low tempera- ture metallic phase, which may be consistent with recent experimental results on ultra-narrow MoGe wires. Near criticality, the ratio of the thermal to electrical con- ductivity displays a linear temperature dependence and thustheWiedemann-Franz law is obeyed.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = Sb, Bs = S B, Similarly for Bs ’S
    Citation: P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020) BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = sb, Bs = s b, similarly for Bs ’s 0 P − Bs I (J ) = 0(0 ) I , J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions. Mass m 0 = 5366.88 ± 0.14 MeV Bs m 0 − mB = 87.38 ± 0.16 MeV Bs Mean life τ = (1.515 ± 0.004) × 10−12 s cτ = 454.2 µm 12 −1 ∆Γ 0 = Γ 0 − Γ 0 = (0.085 ± 0.004) × 10 s Bs BsL Bs H 0 0 Bs -Bs mixing parameters 12 −1 ∆m 0 = m 0 – m 0 = (17.749 ± 0.020) × 10 ¯h s Bs Bs H BsL = (1.1683 ± 0.0013) × 10−8 MeV xs = ∆m 0 /Γ 0 = 26.89 ± 0.07 Bs Bs χs = 0.499312 ± 0.000004 0 CP violation parameters in Bs 2 −3 Re(ǫ 0 )/(1+ ǫ 0 )=(−0.15 ± 0.70) × 10 Bs Bs 0 + − CKK (Bs → K K )=0.14 ± 0.11 0 + − SKK (Bs → K K )=0.30 ± 0.13 0 ∓ ± +0.10 rB(Bs → Ds K )=0.37−0.09 0 ± ∓ ◦ δB(Bs → Ds K ) = (358 ± 14) −2 CP Violation phase βs = (2.55 ± 1.15) × 10 rad λ (B0 → J/ψ(1S)φ)=1.012 ± 0.017 s λ = 0.999 ± 0.017 A, CP violation parameter = −0.75 ± 0.12 C, CP violation parameter = 0.19 ± 0.06 S, CP violation parameter = 0.17 ± 0.06 L ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.06 k ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) )=0.17 ± 0.15 ⊥ ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.10 + − ACP (Bs → π K ) = 0.221 ± 0.015 0 + − ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → [K K ]D K (892) ) = −0.04 ± 0.07 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page1 Created:6/1/202008:28 Citation: P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Instrumentation for a Xenon-Doped Liquid Argon System
    Analysis and instrumentation for a xenon-doped liquid argon system Ryan Gibbons Work completed under the advisement of Professor Michael Gold Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of New Mexico May 27, 2020 1 Abstract Liquid argon is a scintillator frequently used in neutrino and dark matter exper- iments. In particular, is the upcoming LEGEND experiment, a neutrinoless double beta decay search, which will utilize liquid argon as an active veto system. Neutri- noless double beta decay is a theorized lepton number violating process that is only possible if neutrinos are Majorana in nature. To achieve the LEGEND background goal, the liquid argon veto must be more efficient. Past studies have shown the ad- dition of xenon in quantities of parts-per-million in liquid argon improves the light yield, and therefore efficiency, of such a system. Further work, however, is needed to fully understand the effects of this xenon doping. I present a physical model for the light intensity of xenon-doped liquid argon. This model is fitted to data from various xenon concentrations from BACoN, a liquid argon test stand. Additionally, I present preliminary work on the instrumentation of silicon photomultipliers for BACoN. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Neutrinos and double beta decay . 4 1.2 LEGEND and BACoN . 5 1.3 Liquid argon . 6 2 Physical modeling of xenon-doped liquid argon 8 2.1 Model . 8 2.2 Fits to BACoN Data . 9 2.3 Analysis of Rate Constant . 12 3 Instrumentation of SiPMs 12 4 Conclusions and Future Work 13 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Neutrinos and double beta decay Neutrinos are neutral leptons that come in three flavors: electron, muon, and tao.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Group Membership, January 2002 2
    CONTENTS Group Membership, January 2002 2 APPENDIX 1: Report on Activities 2000-2002 & Proposed Programme 2002-2006 4 1OPAL 4 2H1 7 3 ATLAS 11 4 BABAR 19 5DØ 24 6 e-Science 29 7 Geant4 32 8 Blue Sky and applied R&D 33 9 Computing 36 10 Activities in Support of Public Understanding of Science 38 11 Collaborations and contacts with Industry 41 12 Other Research Related Activities by Group Members 41 13 Staff Management and Implementation of Concordat 41 APPENDIX 2: Request for Funds 1. Support staff 43 2. Travel 55 3. Consumables 56 4. Equipment 58 APPENDIX 3: Publications 61 1 Group Membership, May 2002 Academic Staff Dr John Allison Senior Lecturer Professor Roger Barlow Professor Dr Ian Duerdoth Senior Lecturer Dr Mike Ibbotson Reader Dr George Lafferty Reader Dr Fred Loebinger Senior Lecturer Professor Robin Marshall Professor, Group Leader Dr Terry Wyatt Reader Dr A N Other (from Sept 2002) Lecturer Fellows Dr Brian Cox PPARC Advanced Fellow Dr Graham Wilson (leave of absence for 2 yrs) PPARC Advanced Fellow James Weatherall PPARC Fellow PPARC funded Research Associates∗ Dr Nick Malden Dr Joleen Pater Dr Michiel Sanders Dr Ben Waugh Dr Jenny Williams PPARC funded Responsive Research Associate Dr Liang Han PPARC funded e-Science Research Associates Steve Dallison core e-Science Sergey Dolgobrodov core e-Science Gareth Fairey EU/PPARC DataGrid Alessandra Forti GridPP Andrew McNab EU/PPARC DataGrid PPARC funded Support Staff∗ Phil Dunn (replacement) Technician Andrew Elvin Technician Dr Joe Foster Physicist Programmer Julian Freestone
    [Show full text]