DOCSLIB.ORG

View Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

METRO GROUP IN FIGURES1 www.metrogroup.de 08ANNUAL REPORT METRO Group, focus on values € million 2008 2007 20062 Key fi nancial fi gures Sales (net) 67,956 64,2103 58,279 Metro Cash & Carry 33,143 31,698 29,907 Real 11,636 11,003 8,775 Media Markt and Saturn 18,993 17,4443 15,156 Galeria Kaufhof 3,516 3,556 3,609 Other companies 668 5093 832 EBITDA 3,5434 3,3433 3,1624 EBIT 2,2254 2,0783 1,9284 Metro Cash & Carry 1,328 1,243 1,111 Real 214 -16 194 What really matters. Media Markt and Saturn 603 6103 587 Galeria Kaufhof 113 107 82 Other companies/consolidation 1604 134 1294 Financial result -573 -5173 -444 Earnings before taxes 1,6524 1,561 1,564 Net profi t for the period5 7256 1,0516 1,196 thereof from continuing operations 1,1546 1,0656 1,079 thereof attributable to shareholders of METRO AG5 403 825 1,059 Investments 2,480 2,154 3,011 Total assets5 33,825 33,872 32,190 Equity 6,074 6,509 6,050 Equity ratio (%) 18.0 19.2 18.8 Return on equity after taxes (%) 11.96 16.16 19.8 Earnings per share5, 7 (€) 1.23 2.52 3.24 thereof from continuing operations (€) 2.54 2.58 2.88 thereof from discontinued operations (€) -1.31 -0.06 0.36 Earnings per share from continuing operations before special items7, 8 (€) 3.05 2.77 2.72 Dividend per ordinary share (€) 1.189 1.18 1.12 Dividend per preference share (€) 1.2989 1.298 1.232 Market capitalisation as of 31 December (€ billion) 9.3 18.7 15.8 Operating data Employees (annual average by headcount) 290,940 275,520 253,117 Locations (number) 2,195 2,097 2,119 Selling space (1,000 sqm) 12,350 11,779 11,481 Annual Report 2008 1 Continuing operations only (discontinued operations: Praktiker and Extra in 2006, Extra and Adler in 2007 and 2008) 2 Adjustment of previous year’s fi gures due to preliminary accounting for business combinations in 2006 3 Adjustment of previous year’s fi gures due to the changed sales defi nition (see notes to the Group accounting principles and methods in the notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements) 4 In 2008 adjusted for the costs of the trimming of Real’s store network: €203 million was adjusted in EBITDA, of which Real accounted for €223 million and other companies/consolidation for €20 million; €237 million was adjusted in EBIT, of which Real accounted for €224 million and other companies/ consolidation for €13 million; in 2006 adjusted for the effects from the repositioning of Real, including the acquisition of the Wal-Mart Germany group and the Polish Géant business: €80 million was adjusted in EBIT/EBITDA, of which Real accounted for €51 million and other companies/consolidation for €29 million 5 Including discontinued operations 6 In 2008 adjusted for the after-tax costs for the trimming of Real’s store network; in 2007 adjusted for special tax effects 7 After minority interests 8 In 2008 adjusted for the costs of trimming Real’s store network (after taxes); in 2007 adjusted for special tax effects; in 2006 adjusted for the effects from the repositioning of Real, including the acquisition of the Wal-Mart Germany group and the Polish Géant business 9 Subject to approval by the Annual General Meeting METRO GROUP IN FIGURES1 www.metrogroup.de 08ANNUAL REPORT METRO Group, focus on values € million 2008 2007 20062 Key fi nancial fi gures Sales (net) 67,956 64,2103 58,279 Metro Cash & Carry 33,143 31,698 29,907 Real 11,636 11,003 8,775 Media Markt and Saturn 18,993 17,4443 15,156 Galeria Kaufhof 3,516 3,556 3,609 Other companies 668 5093 832 EBITDA 3,5434 3,3433 3,1624 EBIT 2,2254 2,0783 1,9284 Metro Cash & Carry 1,328 1,243 1,111 Real 214 -16 194 What really matters. Media Markt and Saturn 603 6103 587 Galeria Kaufhof 113 107 82 Other companies/consolidation 1604 134 1294 Financial result -573 -5173 -444 Earnings before taxes 1,6524 1,561 1,564 Net profi t for the period5 7256 1,0516 1,196 thereof from continuing operations 1,1546 1,0656 1,079 thereof attributable to shareholders of METRO AG5 403 825 1,059 Investments 2,480 2,154 3,011 Total assets5 33,825 33,872 32,190 Equity 6,074 6,509 6,050 Equity ratio (%) 18.0 19.2 18.8 Return on equity after taxes (%) 11.96 16.16 19.8 Earnings per share5, 7 (€) 1.23 2.52 3.24 thereof from continuing operations (€) 2.54 2.58 2.88 thereof from discontinued operations (€) -1.31 -0.06 0.36 Earnings per share from continuing operations before special items7, 8 (€) 3.05 2.77 2.72 Dividend per ordinary share (€) 1.189 1.18 1.12 Dividend per preference share (€) 1.2989 1.298 1.232 Market capitalisation as of 31 December (€ billion) 9.3 18.7 15.8 Operating data Employees (annual average by headcount) 290,940 275,520 253,117 Locations (number) 2,195 2,097 2,119 Selling space (1,000 sqm) 12,350 11,779 11,481 Annual Report 2008 1 Continuing operations only (discontinued operations: Praktiker and Extra in 2006, Extra and Adler in 2007 and 2008) 2 Adjustment of previous year’s fi gures due to preliminary accounting for business combinations in 2006 3 Adjustment of previous year’s fi gures due to the changed sales defi nition (see notes to the Group accounting principles and methods in the notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements) 4 In 2008 adjusted for the costs of the trimming of Real’s store network: €203 million was adjusted in EBITDA, of which Real accounted for €223 million and other companies/consolidation for €20 million; €237 million was adjusted in EBIT, of which Real accounted for €224 million and other companies/ consolidation for €13 million; in 2006 adjusted for the effects from the repositioning of Real, including the acquisition of the Wal-Mart Germany group and the Polish Géant business: €80 million was adjusted in EBIT/EBITDA, of which Real accounted for €51 million and other companies/consolidation for €29 million 5 Including discontinued operations 6 In 2008 adjusted for the after-tax costs for the trimming of Real’s store network; in 2007 adjusted for special tax effects 7 After minority interests 8 In 2008 adjusted for the costs of trimming Real’s store network (after taxes); in 2007 adjusted for special tax effects; in 2006 adjusted for the effects from the repositioning of Real, including the acquisition of the Wal-Mart Germany group and the Polish Géant business 9 Subject to approval by the Annual General Meeting THE COMPANY METRO Group is one of the world’s largest and most international retailing companies. More than 290,000 employees1 from more than 150 nations work at about 2,200 locations in 32 countries. Our sales brands Metro and Makro Cash & Carry, Media Markt and Saturn command leading market positions in their respective segments. Real is one of the leading hypermarket operators, Galeria Kaufhof is the concept and system leader in its market. The sales brands prove their trading skills and performance strength every single day. 655 locations € 33.1 billion in sales 110,268 employees2 29 countries Metro Cash & Carry is the world’s market leader in the cash & carry trade. 08 09 Operating under the brands of Metro and Makro, it is our biggest and most international sales division. Its assortment is aimed exclusively at commer- GOALS RESULTS GOALS cial and wholesale customers. > SALES In the context of our strategy > METRO Group raised its Group sales by > In view of the global economic downturn, of profi table growth, we projected sales 5.8 percent to €68.0 billion. Adjusted for the lower number of new store openings growth of more than 6 percent for on balance negative exchange rate ef- and negative currency effects, we expect METRO Group in the fi nancial year 2008 fects, sales rose by 6.1 percent. Our Group sales growth to remain markedly below as well as over the medium term. reached its sales target in currency- the medium-term goal of more than 439 locations € 11.6 billion adjusted terms despite an increasingly 6 percent. in sales challenging market environment during 57,530 the course of the year. employees2 3.1 million > EBIT We expected EBIT before special > METRO Group’s EBIT before special > The high level of uncertainty resulting square metres items to increase disproportionately to items met the forecast with an increase from current global economic challenges in total selling space sales. by 7.1 percent to €2,225 million. makes a meaningful forecast for the fi nancial year 2009 impossible at this point. However, we expect the likely weaken- Real is one of the leading hypermarket operators in Germany and Poland. ing of sales growth to also impact our With stores in Germany, Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey, Real represents earnings. The cost-cutting measures and the large-format hypermarket concept. investment cutbacks that have already been implemented are designed to mitigate any such impact on EBIT before special items as far as possible. 768 locations € 19.0 billion in sales > INVESTMENTS Our investments were > Investments in existing concepts and > We will invest a maximum of €1.6 billion. scheduled to exceed the previous year’s organic growth rose by €0.3 billion to a As a result, the number of new store level of €2.2 billion.
Recommended publications
  • Mandaterechner Wie Groß Wird Der Bundestag?

    Mandaterechner Wie Groß Wird Der Bundestag?

    #Mandaterechner Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ausgabe 1 | 2021 Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ergebnisse einer Projektionsrechnung Robert Vehrkamp WIE GROSS WIRD DER BUNDESTAG? – ERGEBNISSE EINER PROJEKTIONSRECHNUNG Impressum © Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Juli 2021 Verantwortlich Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Christina Tillmann Inhaltliche Mitarbeit Lars Bischoff Matthias Moehl Autor Redaktionelle Unterstützung Gaëlle Beckmann Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Sandra Stratos ist Senior Advisor der Bertelsmann Stiftung im Programm „Zukunft der Demokratie“ und war Gast- Gestaltung wissenschaftler der Abteilung „Demokratie und Demo- Markus Diekmann, Bielefeld kratisierung“ am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB). Im Juni 2021 wurde er als Sachverständiger in die Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages zur Reform des Bundeswahlrechts und zur Modernisierung der DOI 10.11586/2021065 Parlamentsarbeit berufen. [email protected] 2 WAS IST UND WAS KANN DER #MANDATERECHNER? Was ist und was kann der #Mandaterechner? Mit dem #Mandaterechner lassen sich Projek- Der #Mandaterechner erweitert damit bisher vor- tionsrechnungen zur Größe des Bundestages nach liegende Berechnungsmodelle um die Variable des der Bundestagswahl 2021 durchführen. Auf der Splittingverhaltens. Anstatt mit einer konkreten Grundlage des aktuellen Umfragetrends und in Annahme über das Splittingverhalten zu arbeiten Abhängigkeit von konkreten Annahmen über das und die Größe des Bundestages dann in Abhän- Splittingverhalten der Wähler:innen zwischen gigkeit vom Zweitstimmenergebnis zu berechnen,

  • Karte Der Wahlkreise Für Die Wahl Zum 19. Deutschen Bundestag

    Karte der Wahlkreise für die Wahl zum 19. Deutschen Bundestag gemäß Anlage zu § 2 Abs. 2 des Bundeswahlgesetzes, die zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 03. Mai 2016 (BGBl. I S. 1062) geändert worden ist Nordfriesland Flensburg 1 Schleswig- Flensburg 2 5 4 Kiel 9 Rendsburg- Plön Rostock 15 Vorpommern- Eckernförde 6 Dithmarschen Rügen Ostholstein Grenze der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Länder Neu- 14 münster Grenze Kreise/Kreisfreie Städte 3 16 Segeberg Steinburg 8 Lübeck Nordwestmecklenburg Rostock Wahlkreisgrenze 11 17 Wahlkreisgrenze 29 Stormarn (auch Kreisgrenze) 7 Vorpommern- Cuxhaven Pinneberg Greifswald Schwerin Wittmund Herzogtum Wilhelms- Lauenburg 26 haven Bremer- 18-23 13 Stade Hamburg Mecklenburgische Saalekreis Kreisname haven 12 24 10 Seenplatte Aurich Halle (Saale) Kreisfreie Stadt Friesland 30 Emden Ludwigslust- Wesermarsch Rotenburg Parchim (Wümme) 36 Uckermark Harburg Lüneburg 72 Wahlkreisnummer Leer Ammerland Osterholz 57 27 Oldenburg (Oldenburg) Prignitz Bremen Gebietsstand der Verwaltungsgrenzen: 29.02.2016 55 35 37 54 Delmen- Lüchow- Ostprignitz- 28 horst 34 Ruppin Heidekreis Dannenberg Oldenburg Uelzen Oberhavel 25 Verden 56 58 Barnim 32 Cloppenburg 44 66 Märkisch- Diepholz Stendal Oderland Vechta 33 Celle Altmarkkreis Emsland Gifhorn Salzwedel Havelland 59 Nienburg 31 75-86 Osnabrück (Weser) Grafschaft 51 Berlin Bentheim 38 Region 43 45 Hannover Potsdam Brandenburg Frankfurt a.d.Havel 63 Wolfsburg (Oder) 134 61 41-42 Oder- Minden- 40 Spree Lübbecke Peine Braun- Börde Jerichower 60 Osnabrück Schaumburg
  • Kandidatinnen Und Kandidaten FDP NRW BTW2017.Xlsx

    Kandidatinnen Und Kandidaten FDP NRW BTW2017.Xlsx

    Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten der FDP-NRW zur Bundestagswahl 2017 Listenplatz WK-Nr. Wahlkreis Titel Vorname Zuname 45 87 Aachen I Dr. Cliff Gatzweiler 47 88 Aachen II Frank Schniske 41 89 Heinsberg Dr. jur. Klaus Jürgen Wagner 20 90 Düren Katharina Kloke 23 91 Rhein-Erft-Kreis I Christian Pohlmann 11 92 Euskirchen – Rhein-Erft-Kreis II Markus Herbrand 8 93 Köln I Reinhard Houben 33 94 Köln II Dr. Annette Wittmütz-Heublein 40 95 Köln III Volker Görzel 3 96 Bonn Alexander Graf Lambsdorff 28 97 Rhein-Sieg-Kreis I Ralph Lorenz 12 98 Rhein-Sieg-Kreis II Nicole Westig kein 99 Oberbergischer Kreis Jörg Kloppenburg 1 100 Rheinisch-Bergischer Kreis Christian Lindner 26 101 Leverkusen – Köln IV Dr. Rolf William Albach 16 102 Wuppertal I Manfred Todtenhausen 44 103 Solingen – Remscheid – Wuppertal II Karin van der Most 37 104 Mettmann I Martina Reuter 21 105 Mettmann II Dr. Anna-Tina Pannes 2 106 Düsseldorf I Dr. Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann 42 107 Düsseldorf II Sebastian Rehne 6 108 Neuss I Bijan Djir-Sarai 38 109 Mönchengladbach Stefan Dahlmanns 7 110 Krefeld I – Neuss II Otto Fricke 46 111 Viersen Andreas Bist kein 112 Kleve Prof. Dr. Ralf Hanns Klapdor 13 113 Wesel I Bernd Reuther 31 114 Krefeld II – Wesel II Florian Philipp Ott 34 115 Duisburg I Carlos Gebauer 22 116 Duisburg II Frank Albrecht 18 117 Oberhausen – Wesel III Roman Müller-Böhm 35 118 Mülheim – Essen I Joachim vom Berg kein 119 Essen II Thomas Wilhelm Friedrich Spilker kein 120 Essen III Tim Wortmann kein 121 Recklinghausen I Anne Krüger kein 122 Recklinghausen II Dr.
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001

    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001

    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
  • Deutscher Bundestag

    Deutscher Bundestag

    Deutscher Bundestag 44. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Freitag, 27.Juni 2014 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 4 Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Caren Lay, Eva Bulling-Schröter, Dr. Dietmar Bartsch, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. zu der dritten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur grundlegenden Reform des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes und zur Änderung weiterer Bestimmungen des Energiewirtschaftsrechts - Drucksachen 18/1304, 18/1573, 18/1891 und 18/1901 - Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 575 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 56 Ja-Stimmen: 109 Nein-Stimmen: 465 Enthaltungen: 1 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 27.06.2014 Beginn: 10:58 Ende: 11:01 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Stephan Albani X Katrin Albsteiger X Peter Altmaier X Artur Auernhammer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Julia Bartz X Günter Baumann X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. Andre Berghegger X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Ute Bertram X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexandra Dinges-Dierig X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Jutta Eckenbach X Dr. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E.
  • Deutsche Bahn AG 24 December 2018 Key Facts and Statistics - H1 June 2018

    Deutsche Bahn AG 24 December 2018 Key Facts and Statistics - H1 June 2018

    CORPORATES ISSUER PROFILE Deutsche Bahn AG 24 December 2018 Key Facts and Statistics - H1 June 2018 Company overview Deutsche Bahn AG (DB) is a mobility and logistics group that also owns and operates the TABLE OF CONTENTS German national rail infrastructure network. As a vertically integrated group, DB operates Company overview 1 long-distance and regional passenger transport in Germany, provides passenger transport Business description 2 services in 14 European countries (excluding Germany) through its subsidiary DB Arriva, and Management strategy 4 Financial highlights 6 provides freight transport and logistics services through its subsidiaries DB Cargo and DB Capital structure and debt maturity 8 Schenker. It also manages railway stations and other rail infrastructure in Germany. Company management 9 DB operates in more than 130 countries worldwide. In the 12 months ended 30 June 2018, it Ownership structure 11 reported revenue of €43.9 billion (as adjusted by Moody's). Peer group 11 Related websites and information Since the second stage of the German government’s rail reforms came into effect in 1999, sources 11 DB has acted as a management holding company for DB Group. In particular, it has exercised Moody’s related research 11 full ownership and control over its Passenger Transport, Freight Transport and Logistics, and Infrastructure divisions. The company is wholly owned by the Federal Republic of Germany. Contacts Source: Company report (annual report Dec 2017), company data, Moody’s research, Moody’s Financial Metrics Francesco Bozzano +33.1.5330.1037 Analyst [email protected] Leila Ezzoubair +33.1.5330.3346 Associate Analyst [email protected] CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE CORPORATES Business description DB is a vertically integrated mobility and logistics group based in Berlin.
  • WWF-Befragung Der Direktkandidaten Zum Vorschlag Eines Klimaschutzgesetzes Vorläufiges Ergebnis, Stand 17

    WWF-Befragung Der Direktkandidaten Zum Vorschlag Eines Klimaschutzgesetzes Vorläufiges Ergebnis, Stand 17

    WWF-Befragung der Direktkandidaten zum Vorschlag eines Klimaschutzgesetzes Vorläufiges Ergebnis, Stand 17. September 2009 Vorname Name Partei Wahlkreis Unterstützen WWF Vorschlag Matthias Zimmer CDU Frankfurt am Main I Roderich Kiesewetter CDU Aalen – Heidenheim Monika Grütters CDU Berlin-Marzahn – Hellersdorf Gesa Tralau SPD Herzogtum Lauenburg – Stormarn-Süd Hanno Fecke SPD Nordfriesland – Dithmarschen Nord Ingrid Lenz-Aktas SPD München-Land Martin Rabanus SPD Rheingau-Taunus – Limburg Josip Juratovic SPD Heilbronn Barbara Hendricks SPD Kleve Wolfgang Wodarg SPD Flensburg – Schleswig Christian Carstensen SPD Hamburg-Nord Wilhelm Priesmeier SPD Goslar – Northeim – Osterode Karl Söllner SPD Regensburg Christoph Strässer SPD Münster Sören Bartol SPD Marburg Michael Hartmann SPD Mainz Anton Schaaf SPD Mülheim – Essen I Gabriele Frechen SPD Erftkreis I Hiltrud Lotze SPD Lüchow-Dannenberg – Lüneburg Hilde Mattheis SPD Ulm Karin Kortmann SPD Düsseldorf II Martin Rosemann SPD Tübingen Angelika Graf SPD Rosenheim Schwall- Angelica Düren SPD Coesfeld – Steinfurt II Lothar Binding SPD Heidelberg Hans-Ulrich Klose SPD Hamburg-Bergedorf – Harburg Thurid Küber SPD Cuxhaven – Stade II Dietmar Nietan SPD Düren Uta Zapf SPD Offenbach Waltraud Wolff SPD Börde – Jerichower Land Helga Kühn-Mengel SPD Euskirchen – Erftkreis II Caren Marks SPD Hannover-Land I Der WWF Deutschland ist eine der nationalen Organisationen des WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature – in Gland (Schweiz). Björn Walden SPD Montabaur Reinhard Strehlke SPD Oberallgäu Martin Schwanholz SPD
  • Gesundheitsausschuss Bundestag

    Gesundheitsausschuss Bundestag

    Vorname Nachname @bundestag.de [email protected] Mailadresse alternativ Partei Rolle Wahlkreis Wahlkreis Mailadresse alternativ Rudolf Henke [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 087: Aachen I [email protected] Michael Hennrich [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Obmann Wahlkreis 262: Nürtingen [email protected] Erich Irlstorfer [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 214: Freising [email protected] Georg Kippels [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 5 Rhein-Erft-Kreis I [email protected] Alexander Krauss [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 15 Erzgebirge III [email protected] Roy Kühne [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 52 Goslar Northeim [email protected] Karin Maag [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 259 Stuttgart II [email protected] Dietrich Monstadt [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 12 Schwerin [email protected] - Parchim I - Nordwestmecklenburg I Stephan Pilsinger [email protected] [email protected] CDU/CSU Wahlkreis 220 München-West/[email protected] Lothar Riebsamen [email protected] [email protected]
  • Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations

    Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations

    Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Sozialwissenschaen vorgelegt von Simon Munzert an der Sektion Politik – Recht – Wirtscha Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenscha Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ þÉ. Juli óþÕ¢ Õ. Referent: Prof. Dr. Susumu Shikano, Universitat¨ Konstanz ó. Referent: Prof. Dr. Peter Selb, Universitat¨ Konstanz ì. Referent: Prof. Michael D. Ward, PhD, Duke University Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-296799 To Stefanie Acknowledgments I would not have been able to write and nish this dissertation without the help and support of many people. First of all, I want to thank my collaborators, Peter Selb and Paul Bauer, for their great work and support. eir contributions to the research presented in this thesis are of no small concern. e single papers received manifold and invaluable feedback over the course of their cre- ation. In particular, Peter Selb and I are grateful to Michael Herrmann, omas Hinz, Winfried Pohlmeier, Susumu Shikano as well as the editors and reviewers of Political Analysis for helpful comments and support. is work was also supported by the Center for Quantitative Methods and Survey Research at the University of Konstanz. e second paper that I wrote together with Paul Bauer also got valuable support. We are grateful to Delia Baldassarri for providing materials of her and Andrew Gelman’s analysis to us. We give the raters of the ALLBUS survey items our most sincere thanks for their contribution. Furthermore, we thank Klaus Armingeon, Matthias Fatke, Markus Freitag, Birte Gundelach, Daniel Stegmuller,¨ Richard Traunmuller¨ and Eva Zeglovits for helpful comments on previ- ous versions of this paper.
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3

    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3

    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
  • Zugelassene Kreiswahlvorschläge Für Die Wahlkreise 1 Aachen I Und 2 Aachen II Zur Landtagswahl Am 13

    Zugelassene Kreiswahlvorschläge Für Die Wahlkreise 1 Aachen I Und 2 Aachen II Zur Landtagswahl Am 13

    Zugelassene Kreiswahlvorschläge für die Wahlkreise 1 Aachen I und 2 Aachen II zur Landtagswahl am 13. Mai 2012 Wahlkreis 1 Aachen I lfd. Nr. Bewerber/in Partei 1 Thönnissen, Ulla Christlich Demokratische Union Diplom-Pädagogin, Geschäftsführerin Deutschlands CDU geb.1963 in Heinsberg Eberburgweg 3, 52076 Aachen 2 Schultheis, Karl Sozialdemokratische Partei Gruppenleiter im Ministerium für Innovation, Deutschlands SPD Wissenschaft und Forschung NRW geb. 1953 in Aachen Banker-Feld-Str. 14, 52072 Aachen 3 Priggen, Reiner BÜNDNIS 90 / DIE GRÜNEN Dipl.-Ingenieur GRÜNE geb.1953 in Sögel Preusweg 3, 52074 Aachen 4 Pabst, Wulf Freie Demokratische Partei selbständig FDP geb. 1974 in Bergisch Gladbach Guaitastr. 23, 52064 Aachen 5 Begolli, Ellen DIE LINKE Fraktionsgeschäftsführerin DIE LINKE geb.1963 in Aachen Erkwiesenstr. 14, 52072 Aachen 6 Teuku, Marc Piratenpartei Deutschland selbständig PIRATEN geb.1980 in Aachen Reumontstr. 2, 52064 Aachen 12 Decarolis, Dominic Partei für Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Student Elitenförderung und basisdemokratische geb. 1962 in Köln Initiative Vaalser Str. 182, 52074 Aachen Die PARTEI FREIE WÄHLER Nordrhein-Westfalen 16 Schaffrath, Hans-Dieter Kaufmann geb. 1947 in Höxter Hubertusweg 14, 52078 Aachen FREIE WÄHLER Wahlkreis 2 Aachen II lfd. Nr. Bewerber/in Partei 1 Laschet, Armin Christlich Demokratische Union Journalist Deutschlands geb. 1961 in Aachen CDU Am Römerhof 24b, 52066 Aachen 2 Jansen, Daniela Sozialdemokratische Partei Projektmanagerin Deutschlands geb. 1977 in Dortmund SPD Ludwigsallee 135, 52062 Aachen 3 Schmitt-Promny, Karin BÜNDNIS 90 / DIE GRÜNEN Soziologin geb. 1953 in Arsbeck GRÜNE Steppenbergweg 85, 52074 Aachen 4 Haveneth, Birgit Freie Demokratische Partei Managementassistentin- Projektcontrolling geb.1975 in Aachen FDP Pingsheimstr. 6, 52076 Aachen 5 Dunker, Darius DIE LINKE Angestellter geb.
  • Zweitstimmenanteile in Den Wahlkreisen Nach Parteien

    Zweitstimmenanteile in Den Wahlkreisen Nach Parteien

    Arbeitstabellen für die Bundestagswahl 2017 7 Endgültige Zweitstimmenanteile in den Wahlkreisen nach Parteien Stimmen- Lfd. Nr. Wkr. Nr. Wahlkreisbezeichnung Land anteil CDU 1 032 Cloppenburg – Vechta NI 53,1 2 031 Mittelems NI 49,4 3 126 Borken II NW 47,0 4 202 Bitburg RP 44,5 5 127 Coesfeld – Steinfurt II NW 44,0 6 124 Steinfurt I – Borken I NW 43,9 7 292 Biberach BW 43,1 8 025 Unterems NI 42,4 9 147 Hochsauerlandkreis NW 41,7 10 112 Kleve NW 41,6 11 200 Mosel/Rhein-Hunsrück RP 41,6 12 137 Paderborn – Gütersloh III NW 40,7 13 149 Olpe – Märkischer Kreis I NW 40,6 14 198 Ahrweiler RP 40,6 15 038 Osnabrück-Land NI 40,4 16 130 Warendorf NW 40,3 17 276 Odenwald – Tauber BW 39,8 18 089 Heinsberg NW 39,5 19 288 Waldshut BW 39,3 20 174 Fulda HE 39,0 21 030 Stade I – Rotenburg II NI 38,9 22 294 Ravensburg BW 38,9 23 029 Cuxhaven – Stade II NI 38,5 24 131 Gütersloh I NW 38,4 25 002 Nordfriesland – Dithmarschen Nord SH 38,3 26 197 Neuwied RP 38,2 27 270 Aalen – Heidenheim BW 38,2 28 111 Viersen NW 38,1 29 285 Rottweil – Tuttlingen BW 38,0 30 295 Zollernalb – Sigmaringen BW 38,0 31 033 Diepholz – Nienburg I NI 37,9 32 273 Rastatt BW 37,9 33 128 Steinfurt III NW 37,8 34 199 Koblenz RP 37,8 35 286 Schwarzwald-Baar BW 37,8 36 035 Rotenburg I – Heidekreis NI 37,7 37 204 Montabaur RP 37,5 38 136 Höxter – Lippe II NW 37,3 39 203 Trier RP 37,3 40 280 Calw BW 37,2 41 284 Offenburg BW 37,1 42 293 Bodensee BW 37,1 43 291 Ulm BW 37,0 44 044 Celle – Uelzen NI 36,6 45 099 Oberbergischer Kreis NW 36,5 46 298 St.