TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS Annual Report 1 9 9 4
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
January 1994 CD-ROM: August 1994
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Rolf R. Schmitt Editor-in-Chief TRANSPORTATION Terry D. Feinberg Managing Editor Federico Peña, Secretary
BUREAU OF Major Contributors: TRANSPORTATION Kathleen M. Bradley Volpe National Transportation Systems Center STATISTICS Shih Miao Chin Oak Ridge National Laboratory 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 2104 Washington, D.C. 20590 Stacy C. Davis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Main Number: 202-366-DATA Douglas C. Frechtling George Washington University Fax: 202-366-3640 Statistical Information: 800-853-1351 John W. Fuller University of Iowa Philip N. Fulton Bureau of Transportation Statistics T.R. Lakshmanan, Director David L. Greene Oak Ridge National Laboratory Robert A. Knisely, Deputy Director Patricia S. Hu Oak Ridge National Laboratory Rolf R. Schmitt, Associate Director for Analysis and Data Development Alan Pisarski Consultant Philip N. Fulton, Associate Director Michael A. Rossetti Volpe National Transportation Systems Center for Data User Services Lorelei S. Evans, Administrative Other Contributors: Officer Philip Barbato Office of the Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth V. Ellis, Secretary Patricia Beardsley Federal Aviation Administration Lonn Henrichsen, Senior Technology Advisor (Acting) Louann M. Hall National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Terry Feinberg, Managing Editor Bruce D. Spear Volpe National Transportation Systems Center EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
he Transportation Statistics Annual Report is a summary of the state of the transportation system and its consequences, the quality of statistics used to characterize the transportationT system, and planned efforts by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) to improve the quality of the statistics. BTS was established by Congress to compile, analyze, and make accessible information on the nation’s transportation sys- tem; to collect information on intermodal transportation and other related areas as needed; and to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the Department of Trans- portation’s statistical programs through research, the devel- opment of guidelines, and the promotion of improvements in data acquisition and use.
The State of the Gross Domestic Product have both grown Transportation System steadily over the past three decades. Ton- miles per person have also increased, although the ratio of ton-miles to Gross Transportation is a pervasive compo- Domestic Product has declined. nent of daily life and a significant share of The transportation system includes the national economy. Travel consumes 190.4 million automobiles, vans, and roughly an hour of an average person’s trucks operating on 3.9 million miles of day, and roughly one-sixth of household streets and highways; 103,000 transit vehi- expenditures. American households, busi- cles operating on those streets, as well as nesses, and governments spend over $1 more than 7,000 miles of subways, street- trillion to travel 3.8 trillion miles and to car lines, and commuter railroads; ship goods 3.5 trillion ton miles each year. 275,000 airplanes operating in and out of When adjusted to formal definitions of the 17,500 airports and landing fields; 18,000 National Income Product Accounts, trans- locomotives and 1.2 million cars operating portation accounts for 12 percent of Gross over 113,000 miles of railroads; 20 million Domestic Product. recreational boats, 31,000 barges, and over Passenger travel and freight movements 8,000 U.S. ships, tugs, and other commer- continue to increase. Passenger-miles per cial vessels operating on 26,000 miles of person and the ratio of passenger-miles to waterways, the Great Lakes, and the
i Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1994
oceans; and 1.5 million miles of intercity sumption and environmental quality. pipelines. The numbers and use of vehi- Improvements in fuel economy over the cles, vessels, and aircraft generally contin- past decade are leveling off or declining ue to grow, while the infrastructure over for most forms of transportation, and which they operate has not expanded sig- show little potential for significant nificantly in extent or capacity. Both the improvement in the near future. As a infrastructure and the fleets operating result, we can expect petroleum use by over the infrastructure are aging, and plac- transportation to increase in step with ing greater demands on maintenance and passenger travel and goods movement. reconstruction. Impacts on air quality, global warming, The performance of the transporta- and other environmental issues are much tion system from the user’s perspective is harder to monitor, but show past improve- not improving on the passenger side as it ment and potential for further gains. did in past decades. Large gains in speeds have ended as the Interstate System has reached completion and become increas- The State of Transportation ingly congested, and as airlines shift from Statistics nonstop flights to hub-and-spoke opera- tions. In contrast the freight system shows major gains through innovations While many conditions and trends in intermodal service, through the growth have been characterized, a better under- in parcel express delivery, and in the shift standing of the performance of the trans- of businesses to just-in-time delivery sys- portation system and the potential for its tems. Both passenger travel and freight improvement requires both better cover- movements were disrupted temporarily age and increased quality of existing data, by the 1993 Midwest floods, which closed and the design and implementation of bet- over 1,600 miles of navigable waterways, ter measures to transform existing and 3,764 miles of mainline railroads, over new data into useful information. 380 miles of major highways, and 34 air- New or significantly expanded data ports. collection is needed on: location, condi- Spending on the transportation system tion, and physical performance of trans- by households, businesses, and govern- portation services and facilities provided ments has increased eight-fold in current by the private sector, and intermodal con- dollars over the past three decades. Some nections provided by both public and pri- of the increase is due to the replacement vate sectors; quantity, geographic of inventories by just-in-time transporta- distribution, and cost of commodity and tion. Some of the increase in transporta- passenger movements; expenditures and tion spending is due to a shift to higher revenues of passenger transportation com- quality service, as illustrated by the enor- panies and selected providers of freight mous growth in both household and busi- transportation services; inventory and use ness use of overnight delivery services. of transportation resources controlled by Government spending has not increased at establishments that are not primarily in the same rate as household and business the business of for-hire transportation; spending; in constant dollars, state and and fuel consumption and fuel economy local government spending on transporta- based on real-world experience rather tion facilities and services has increased than laboratory conditions. modestly in the past decade while federal More reliable, comparable, or de- spending has been flat. tailed information is needed on: location, The price we pay for transportation is condition, and physical performance of not limited to direct monetary costs. transportation services and facilities pro- Transportation accounts for half of all vided by the public sector; balance of accidental deaths in the U.S. Although the trade related to transportation services number of fatalities and the fatal accident and international travel; characteristics rate have shown significant improvement and travel behavior of foreign visitors in in the past decade, transportation acci- the U.S. and of U.S. travelers abroad; dents took more than 42,000 lives in 1992 business travel; motor vehicle miles of alone. Other costs include energy con- travel by vehicle type; safety (particularly
ii Executive Summary with respect to definitions of terms); and serve as a foundation for future editions of environmental conditions affected by the Transportation Statistics Annual transportation. Report. The first area is to complete the Better measures or analytical methods Commodity Flow Survey now underway to transform data into useful information and to initiate a similar survey of passen- are needed on subjects such as: conges- ger travel to determine how many people tion; productivity of the transportation and how much cargo move between sector; the contribution of transportation regions of the country, and by what activity and infrastructure investments to means. The second area is to obtain geo- economic growth, employment, and com- graphic and other information on trans- petitiveness; relationships be-tween envi- portation facilities and intermodal ronmental quality and the use of vehicles, connections. The third area of BTS activi- vessels, and aircraft; and the transporta- ty is reconsideration of basic measures of tion needs of disadvantaged groups. transportation, such as congestion and BTS is directing its near-term energies productivity, to make sure that transporta- toward three areas to improve the effec- tion statistics relate to concepts that are tiveness of transportation statistics and to useful to decisionmakers and the public.
iii Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...... i Table of Contents ...... v List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...... vii Preface ...... ix Chapter One: Transportation and the Nation ...... 1 Chapter Two: Transportation Network ...... 15 Chapter Three: Use of the System ...... 49 Chapter Four: How Well Does it Work? ...... 71 Chapter Fve: Transportation and its Costs ...... 101 Chapter Six: Transportation and Safety ...... 133 Chapter Seven: Transportation, Energy, and the Environment ...... 149 Chapter Eight: The State of the Statistics ...... 177 Chapter Nine: Transportation and the Future ...... 201 Appendix: Transportation Statistics Programs ...... app-1 ACRONYMS/ ABBREVIATIONS
AAR Association of American CO Carbon Monoxide Railroads CO2 Carbon Dioxide ADA Americans with Disabilities COE Corps of Engineers Act COFC Container-on-Flat-Car AMFA Alternative Motor Fuels Act of 1988 CPI Consumer Price Index APTA American Public Transit CRLIND Civil Rail Lines Important to Association National Defense ATSF Atchison, Topeka and Santa CTPP Census Transportation Fe Railroad Planning Package ATS American Travel Survey dBA Decibel ATV Accurate Traffic Volume DOD U.S. Department of Defense AVI Automated Vehicle DOE U.S. Department of Energy Identification DOT U.S. Department of BTS Bureau of Transportation Transportation Statistics DRI DRI/McGraw-Hill Btu British Thermal Unit ECPC Economic Classification CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments of Policy Committee 1990 EDI Electronic Data Interchange CD-ROM Compact Disk-Read Only EPA U.S. Environmental Memory Protection Agency CFC Chlorofluorocarbon EPACT Energy Policy Act of 1992 CFS Commodity Flow Survey EV Electric Vehicle CH Methane 4 FAA Federal Aviation CNG Compressed Natural Gas Administration
vii Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1994
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory NSDI National Spatial Data Commission Infrastructure FHWA Federal Highway NTS National Transportation Administration System
FMVCP Federal Motor Vehicle O3 Ozone Control Program OMB Office of Management and FRA Federal Railroad Budget Administration PPI Producer’s Price Index GBF/DIME Geographic Base File/Dual PSR Present Servicability Rating Independent Map Encoding RCRA Resource Conservation GDP Gross Domestic Product Recovery Act GIS Geographic Information rpm Revenue Passenger Mile Systems SIC Standard Industrial GNP Gross National Product Classification GPS Global Positioning Systems Smpg Seat Miles per Gallon HPMS Highway Performance SO Sulfur Oxide Monitoring System x STCC Standard Transportation ICC Interstate Commerce Commodity Classification Commission STOL Short Take-off and Landing IPD Implicit Price Deflator TDC U.S. Travel Data Center IRI International Roughness Index TEU Container Equivalent ISTEA Intermodal Surface TIA Transportation in America Transportation Efficiency TIUS Truck Inventory and Use Act of 1991 Survey ITAB Intermodal Transportation TL Truckload Advisory Board TOFC Trailer-on-Flat-Car LNG Liquefied Natural Gas TP Total Particulate Matter LOS Level of Service TCIC Technical Committee on LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industrial Classification LTL Less-Than-Truckload USTTA U.S. Travel and Tourism M85 85 Percent/15 Percent Information Association Unleaded gasoline VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled MLC Military Load Classification VNTSC Volpe National mpg Miles Per Gallon Transportation Systems Center mph Miles Per Hour VOC Volatile Organic Compounds MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area VTS Vessel Traffic Service N20 Nitrous Oxide WATS Survey of Motor Freight NPIAS National Plan of Integrated Transportation and Public Airport Systems Warehousing NPTS Nationwide Personal WIM Weigh-in-Motion Transportation Studies
viii
PREFACE
he Transportation Statistics Annual Report is the keystone publication of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). BTS is the newest operating administration of the U.S. DepartmentT of Transportation (DOT), and is responsible for compiling, analyzing, and making accessible information on the nation’s transportation systems; collect- ing information on intermodal transportation and other areas as needed; and enhancing the quality and effective- ness of the statistical programs of DOT through research, the development of guidelines, and the promotion of improvements in data acquisition and use.
In this inaugural edition of the Trans- wrong conclusions. Popular concepts and portation Statistics Annual Report, BTS the definitions of professional analysts provides information on the many eclectic often diverge; even definitions among vari- topics identified by Congress in Section ous academic disciplines can vary. 6006 of the Intermodal Surface Trans- For purposes of this report, the trans- portation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, portation industry is recognized to be and suggests future directions for research those establishments or parts of establish- and data development. BTS endeavors to ments that build transportation facilities provide a comprehensive assessment of and equipment; operate transportation the nation’s transportation system, contin- facilities; provide for-hire transportation uing a tradition that started with the services for individuals, households, busi- Gallatin Report of 1808. This tradition of nesses, or government agencies; provide comprehensive assessments across all in-house transportation for a business or forms of transportation has been practiced government agency; arrange transporta- only sporadically by the federal govern- tion services for individuals, households, ment since DOT’s creation in 1966. businesses, or government agencies; pro- Discussions of transportation in vide supporting services necessary to the publications such as the Transportation provision of transportation services; or Statistics Annual Report are organized administer transportation programs. This around concepts such as industries, modes, definition includes a diverse cross section markets, and corridors. These terms are of the economy, such as automobile man- typically used without precise meanings, ufacturers, railroads, travel agents, school often leading to misunderstandings and district bus operators, port authorities, gas
ix Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1994
stations, and the trucking fleets of major markets most typically identified—intercity grocery chains. As discussed in several passenger, intercity freight, international, chapters of this report, more restrictive urban, and rural—have more variation definitions are required for some account- within each category than between cate- ing systems. The broad definition is use- gories. For example, international trans- ful, however, in understanding the portation between New York and Montreal pervasiveness of transportation to the has more in common with intercity trans- nation’s economy and way of life. portation between New York and Chicago Transportation planners, analysts, and than with intercontinental transportation. decisionmakers refer to the means of Urban transportation is very different transportation as modes. The transporta- between the largest metropolitan areas and tion community’s historic emphasis on small cities. A more effective classification individual modes is being supplanted by would require a substantially larger num- an emphasis on intermodalism, typically ber of categories to reflect common sets of used in three contexts. Most narrowly, it supply and demand attributes. refers to containerization, piggyback ser- Corridors are a more meaningful con- vice, and other technologies that provide cept than the five markets. Corridors the seamless movement of goods and peo- come in all sizes, from the North Atlantic ple by more than one mode of transport. corridor between North America and More broadly, intermodalism refers to Europe to the Northeast Corridor between the provision of connections between dif- Boston and Washington, D.C. to the ferent modes, such as adequate highways Route 50 corridor in the Washington sub- to ports or bus feeder services to rail tran- urbs. Corridors are the key units for cap- sit. In its broadest interpretation, inter- turing the geographic and temporal modalism refers to a holistic view of variations that are central to understand- transportation in which individual modes ing transportation problems. Unfortu- work together or within their own niches to nately, very little transportation data exist provide the user with the best choices of even for multistate corridors. Until the service, and in which the consequences on multimodal commodity and passenger all modes of policies for a single mode are flow studies now underway are complet- considered. This view has been called bal- ed, this report must be limited to national anced, integrated, or comprehensive trans- and statewide aggregates. portation in the past. The range and integration of topics in Congress and others frequently use the this first edition of the Transportation term intermodalism in its broadest inter- Statistics Annual Report is a significant pretation as a synonym for multimodal accomplishment for an agency that is just transportation. Most precisely, multi- one year old; however, the report’s authors modal transportation covers all modes recognize that this document is a begin- without necessarily including a holistic or ning rather than a conclusion. Many topics integrated approach. requiring further analysis and data acquisi- BTS accepts the broad interpretation tion are highlighted throughout the vol- of intermodalism in its philosophy, but ume. A number of improvements, such as prefers the middle ground in its use of the the full integration of metric measures into term. The Bureau collects and reports the report and the development of innova- information on multimodal transportation tive thematic maps, are planned for subse- systems, including both individual modes quent editions. BTS encourages the reader and intermodal combinations. to provide comments on this inaugural While BTS embraces an intermodal effort so that future issues of the philosophy, the Bureau does not adhere to Transportation Statistics Annual Report can the current convention of categorizing the be made more useful to both decision- transportation system into markets. The makers and the transportation community.
x
C H A P T E R O N E
TRANSPORTATION and the NATION
ransportation activity consumes vast quantities of the nation’s wealth and resources, along with the time of its citizens. Because it is always defined as a means to an end rather than asT an end in itself, it is difficult to explain what transportation is and why it must be valued highly. Here, we provide a sense of transportation’s size and pervasiveness. We also define transportation’s role in the economy of the nation and in our daily lives. This overview attempts to answer the basic question: Why do we care about transportation?
Transportation and Society “thing produced” by transportation in some- thing other than the most rudimentary mea- sures of tons moved or people carried. America is perhaps the world’s most The pleasure of motion is reflected in mobile society. We have become so many social activities of the nation, e.g., because of the vast expanses of our nation, recreational bicycling, flying, boating, and because of the need to move raw materials traveling scenic byways. Most statistical long distances to processing sites or world treatments of transportation, including markets, and because of that “something” this one, fail to recognize properly the in the American people that continuously social and recreational aspects of trans- suggests movement. Transportation portation. A number of years ago a presi- throughout our history has been the main dential commission studying Americans’ tool of knitting together a nation. outdoor activities identified “taking a ride” To capture the rich interplay between as the number one outdoor recreation transportation and the society it serves in activity for Americans.1 statistical terms is an attractive and daunt- About one-sixth of the expenditures of ing responsibility. One of the great chal- American households go to transportation lenges is to structure measures of goods and services. Americans make near- transportation productivity in ways that ly a thousand trips per year per person, effectively transmit the real value of the covering about 15,000 miles annually.
1
Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1994
Perhaps a more significant statistic, in a relatively stable level of about one-sixth of society where time increasingly is becom- consumer spending, although the long- ing a more precious commodity than term trend indicates a declining share of money, is the fact that they spend at least income going to transportation. (See fig- one hour per day in travel. (See table 1-1.) ure 1-1.) “Vehicle Purchases” refers to The average journey to work is 45 minutes spending for new and used vehicles; round trip on work days. In addition, an “Other Vehicle Expenses” includes insur- extraordinary number of people make their ance, vehicle repairs, and financing costs; living either using or providing transporta- “Gas and Oil” and “Purchased Transpor- tion services. It is interesting to speculate tation” refer to vehicle leasing as well as at any one moment in the day what pro- all transportation that is not self-operated, portion of the population is in motion— e.g., taxis, urban transit, bus, rail, and air driving a car, riding in a bus, piloting a travel. (Note: Some caution must be exer- plane or riding in one. Whatever the actual cised in reviewing a single year’s data.) number, a substantial part of the popula- History has shown that transportation tion values very highly the services they expenditures—especially vehicle purchas- receive from the transportation system. es—can be quite volatile from year to year. The long-term trend in most elements is for transportation to consume a smaller T A B L E 1 – 1 share of total household expenditures. Of significance was the continuing decline in the share of total spending represented by Weekly Time in Travel by Trip Purpose for gasoline expenditures. The percentage of Persons 16 and Older household expenditures devoted to gaso- line and oil in 1991 was almost precisely Trip Purpose Time Spent (Hours) half what it was in 1980. Despite indications that the share of To or From Work 1.76 household income spent on transportation Work-related Business .16 is on the decline, it is nevertheless true Shopping .85 that society still places high value in mobility. This view is supported by the Other Family or Personal Business 1.30 fact that the percentage of spending going School/Church .36 to transport tends to rise with increasing Doctor/Dentist .08 incomes, only declining in share of spend- ing for the highest income groups. Vacation .12 This fact suggests that as their discre- Visiting Friends/Relatives .70 tionary income rises the public chooses to Pleasure Driving .05 Other Social and Recreational 1.04 F I G U R E 1 – 1 Other .05 Total Consumer Spending Shares by Total Time Per Week 6.47 Major Category: 1991
Food Other (14.4%) How People Value (16.4%) Insurance & Transportation Pensions (9.4%)