DOCSLIB.ORG

Case M.7630 - Fedex / Tnt Express

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case M.7630 - Fedex / Tnt Express EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition CASE M.7630 - FEDEX / TNT EXPRESS (Only the English text is authentic) MERGER PROCEDURE REGULATION (EC) 139/2004 Article 8 (1) Regulation (EC) 139/2004 Date: 08/01/2016 This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets. EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.1.2016 C(2015) 9826 final Public Version COMMISSION DECISION of 8.1.2016 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.7630 FedEx/TNT Express) (Text with EEA relevance) EN 1 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 13 2. The Concentration ...................................................................................................... 14 3. Union Dimension ....................................................................................................... 14 4. The Procedure ............................................................................................................ 14 5. Cargo transport and freight forwarding ...................................................................... 15 5.1. Cargo transport ........................................................................................................... 15 5.1.1. Market definition ........................................................................................................ 15 5.1.2. Competitive assessment ............................................................................................. 16 5.1.3. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 16 5.2. Freight Forwarding..................................................................................................... 16 5.2.1. Market Definition ....................................................................................................... 16 5.2.2. Competitive assessment ............................................................................................. 17 5.2.3. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 17 6. Small Package Delivery Services – Industry Overview ............................................ 17 6.1. Value Chain ................................................................................................................ 17 6.2. Competitive Landscape .............................................................................................. 19 6.2.1. Integrators .................................................................................................................. 19 6.2.2. Non-integrators .......................................................................................................... 19 6.2.2.1. Incumbent postal operators ........................................................................................ 20 6.2.2.2. National small package delivery companies and partner networks ........................... 20 6.2.2.3. Freight forwarders ...................................................................................................... 21 6.2.2.4. Others ......................................................................................................................... 21 6.2.2.5. Resellers ..................................................................................................................... 21 6.3. Small package delivery is a highly differentiated sector ........................................... 21 6.4. Network Industry and importance of economies of scale .......................................... 22 6.4.1. Effect of network density on pick-up and delivery costs ........................................... 22 6.5. Buyers ........................................................................................................................ 23 6.6. Bundling and multi-sourcing ...................................................................................... 23 6.7. Barriers to entry .......................................................................................................... 25 7. Small Package Delivery Services – Market Definition .............................................. 26 7.1. Relevant product markets ........................................................................................... 26 7.1.1. Small packages vs freight........................................................................................... 26 7.1.2. Domestic vs international ........................................................................................... 27 7.1.3. International intra-EEA small package delivery services .......................................... 28 7.1.4. Extra-EEA small package delivery services .............................................................. 30 EN 2 EN 7.1.4.1. Extra-EEA small package delivery services concern a variety of providers offering differentiated services ................................................................................................ 30 7.1.4.2. Express and deferred are sub segments of a wider extra-EEA market ...................... 31 7.1.4.2.1. FedEx's view ............................................................................................................ 31 7.1.4.2.2 Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 35 7.1.4.2.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 45 7.1.4.3. Segmentation of extra-EEA small package delivery services by major destination lane ............................................................................................................................. 45 7.1.4.3.1. FedEx's view ............................................................................................................ 45 7.1.4.3.2. Commission's assessment ......................................................................................... 46 7.1.4.3.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 50 7.1.5. Conclusion on the relevant product markets .............................................................. 50 7.2. Relevant geographic markets ..................................................................................... 50 7.2.1. International intra-EEA express small package delivery services ............................. 51 7.2.1.1. FedEx's view .............................................................................................................. 51 7.2.1.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 51 7.2.1.3. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 54 7.2.2. Extra-EEA small package delivery services .............................................................. 54 7.2.2.1. FedEx's view .............................................................................................................. 54 7.2.2.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 54 7.2.2.3. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 56 8. Small Package Delivery Services – Market Reconstruction ...................................... 56 9. INTRA-EEA express delivery services markets ........................................................ 59 9.1. Principles and introduction ........................................................................................ 59 9.2. Competitive constraint exercised by non-integrators ................................................. 60 9.3. The Merged Entity's market position on international intra-EEA express delivery services markets would be moderate .......................................................................... 64 9.3.1. Market shares submitted by FedEx ............................................................................ 64 9.3.2. Results of the Commission's market reconstruction exercise .................................... 66 9.4. Amongst integrators, FedEx and TNT are no close competitors regarding international intra-EEA express delivery services ..................................................... 67 9.4.1. FedEx's views ............................................................................................................. 68 9.4.2. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 68 9.4.2.1. FedEx's business focus is on customers with significant extra-EEA delivery needs . 69 9.4.2.1.1FedEx derives the large majority of international intra-EEA express revenues from customers that also purchase extra-EEA services ...................................................... 69 9.4.2.1.2FedEx's focus on international intra-EEA customers that are heavy users of extra- EEA services is due to the low scale and density of its operations in the EEA. ........ 71 EN 3 EN 9.4.2.2. TNT's
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
    “A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and
    [Show full text]
  • On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States
    On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States BY JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, BRIAN ANTOLIN & CRYSTAL BELL JANUARY 30, 2021 CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY | POLICY SERIES THE STUDY TEAM AUTHORS BRIAN ANTOLIN, JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN AND CRYSTAL BELL CARTOGRAPHY ALL TOGETHER STUDIO AND GRAPHICS ASSISTING MICHAEL R. WEINMAN AND PATRICIA CHEMKA SPERANZA OF PTSI TRANSPORTATION CONTRIBUTORS DATA KIMBERLY FAIR AND MITCH HIRST TEAM COVER BOTTOM CENTER: ANNA SHVETS; BOTTOM LEFT: SEE CAPTION ON PAGE 1; PHOTOGRAPHY TOP AND BOTTOM RIGHT: CHADDICK INSTITUTE The Chaddick Insttute does not receive funding from intercity bus lines or suppliers of bus operators. This report was paid for using general operatng funds. For further informaton, author bios, disclaimers, and cover image captons, see page 20. JOIN THE STUDY TEAM FOR A WEBINAR ON THIS STUDY: Friday, February 19, 2021 from noon to 1 pm CT (10 am PT) | Free Email [email protected] to register or for more info CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY CONTACT: JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. | PHONE: 312.362.5732 | EMAIL: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The prognosis for the intercity bus industry remains uncertain due to the weakened financial condition of most scheduled operators and the unanswerable questions about the pace of a post-pandemic recovery. This year’s Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry report draws attention to some of the industry’s changing fundamentals while also looking at notable developments anticipated this year and beyond. Our analysis evaluates the industry in six areas: i) The status of bus travel booking through January 2021; ii) Notable marketing and service developments of 2020; iii) The decline of the national bus network sold on greyhound.com that is relied upon by travelers on thousands of routes across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Perspectives
    CONFIDENTIAL May 2019 Logistics Review The Unbundling and Innovation of Logistics DISCLAIMER: ComCap LLC make no representation or warranty, express or implied, in relation to the fairness, accuracy, correctness, completeness, or reliability of the information, opinions, or conclusions contained herein. ComCap LLC accepts no liability for any use of these materials. The materials are not intended to be relied upon as advice outside of a paid, approved use and they should not be considered a guarantee of any specific result. Each recipient should consult his or her own accounting, tax, financial, and other professional advisors when considering the scenarios and information provided. CONFIDENTIAL An introduction to ComCap § ComCap is a premier boutique investment bank focused on the intersection of commerce and capital, with key focus on B2B SaaS, B2C ecommerce, payments, mobile commerce, marketplaces and B2B services for retail technologies (IT and marketing services, in-store, fulfillment, logistics, call center, analytics or personalization). § Headquartered in San Francisco with European coverage from London and Moscow, as well as Latin America coverage from Sao Paulo. Our firm works with mid-cap public companies on buyside initiatives along with public and private growth companies on financing and strategic M&A. § In addition to being the only boutique focused on disruptive commerce models, we differentiate by: ‒ Bringing bulge bracket techniques to emerging models; ‒ A strong and uncommon buyside or strategy practice; ‒ Deep understanding
    [Show full text]
  • TRB Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, And
    Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles SPECIAL REPORT 267 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2002 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chairman: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chairman: Genevieve Giuliano, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board William D. Ankner, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence Thomas F. Barry, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee Michael W. Behrens, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin Jack E. Buffington, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Sarah C. Campbell, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, D.C. Joanne F. Casey, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland James C. Codell III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort John L. Craig, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln Robert A. Frosch, Senior Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Susan Hanson, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Lester A. Hoel, L.A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University
    [Show full text]
  • TNT Annual Report 2008
    Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Cautionary note with regard to Introduction and “forward-looking statements” financial highlights Some statements in this annual report are “forward-looking statements”. This is TNT’s annual report for the financial year ended 31 December 2008, By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty prepared in accordance with Dutch regulations. TNT delisted its American because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in Depositary Receipts from the New York Stock Exchange on 18 June 2007, the future. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown and its reporting obligations with the United States Securities and Exchange risks, uncertainties and other factors that are outside of TNT’s control and Commission terminated on 16 September 2007. TNT is therefore no longer impossible to predict and may cause actual results to differ materially from any required to file its annual repor t on Form 20-F. future results expressed or implied. These forward-looking statements are However, where TNT thinks it is helpful, certain information is retained for based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, analyses and projections comparative purposes. In this way TNT intends to provide its stakeholders with about the industries in which TNT operates and TNT management’s beliefs a clear overview of its financial year 2008. and assumptions about future events. Unless otherwise specified or the context so requires, “TNT”, the “company”, You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking the “group”, “it” and “its” refer to TNT N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Global Connections Corporate Overview Updated 9/2018 Corporate Overview Updated 2/2021 Who We Are Our Mission
    Powering Global Connections Corporate Overview Updated 9/2018 Corporate Overview Updated 2/2021 Who We Are Our Mission FedEx Corporation will produce superior financial returns for its shareowners by providing high-value-added logistics, transportation, and related business services through focused operating companies. Customer requirements will be met in the highest quality manner appropriate to each market segment served. FedEx will strive to develop mutually rewarding relationships with its team members, partners, and suppliers. Safety will be the first consideration in all operations. Corporate activities will be conducted to the highest ethical and professional standards. 3 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion "At FedEx, our workforce is as diverse as the world we serve, and we believe that everyone deserves respect. Embracing diversity is not just the right thing to do; we also have proven that it fosters innovation and makes us a more competitive company. It’s also about fostering acceptance, promoting anti-biases, and encouraging a more inclusive society. These values are core to who we are and how we operate." -Chairman and CEO Fred Smith and President & COO Raj Subramaniam 4 FedEx is consistently named among the world’s most valuable and admired brands. FORTUNE No. 14 among Forbes “World’s Most Admired One of the “Best Companies” Employers for Diversity” Reputation Institute Forbes “RepTrak 100” “World’s Most Valuable List of the World’s Most Brands” Reputable Companies U.S. Chamber of FORTUNE “100 Best Commerce Foundation Places to Work” “Corporate Citizenship Hall of Fame Inductee” Newsweek Magazine America’s Best Customer Service 2021 - #1 for Shipping and Delivery Services 5 Strength in Numbers TEAM 680 AIRCRAFT ≈ 600K MEMBERS COUNTRIES AND OPERATING > 220 TERRITORIES SERVED > 5K FACILITIES DAILY TRACKING > 400M REQUESTS SHIPMENTS >18M PER BUSINESS DAY (AVG.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20 and Financial Statements Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-20 Royal Mail plc 1 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019–20 CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Report Strategic 02 Overview 159 Independent auditor’s report 04 Who we are 166 Consolidated income statement 06 Financial and operational highlights 2019-20 167 Consolidated statement 15 Interim Executive Chair’s statement of comprehensive income 18 Delivering throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 168 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Business review 2019-20 170 Consolidated statement of changes in equity Corporate Governance Corporate 26 Market overview 171 Consolidated statement of cash flows 28 Business model 173 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Measuring our performance 233 Significant accounting policies 32 Financial review 247 Royal Mail plc – Parent Company financial statements 62 Principal risks and uncertainties 73 Viability statement Shareholder Information Financial Statements 74 Corporate responsibility 250 Group five year summary (unaudited) 86 Non-financial information statement 252 Shareholder information 253 Forward-looking statements Corporate Governance 88 Chair’s introduction 90 Group Board of Directors 92 Executive Board – Royal Mail Information Shareholder 94 Governance structure 96 Board in action 100 Board composition and diversity 101 Reporting against the 2018 Corporate Governance Code 102 Board induction programme 103 Annual evaluation of Board performance and effectiveness 104 Engaging with our stakeholders 110 The Board’s considerations to our stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic 112 Employee engagement 114 Nomination Committee 117 Audit and Risk Committee 126 Corporate Responsibility Committee 128 Directors’ Remuneration Report 154 Directors’ Report 157 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 2 Strategic Report OVERVIEW ROYAL MAIL (UKPIL) Our UK business has faced significant challenges for some years.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Services: a Consumer Perspective Qualitative Research with Residential Consumers and Small Business Owners October 2012
    Postal Services: a consumer perspective Qualitative research with residential consumers and small business owners October 2012 Acknowledgements Thanks to the members of the general public who participated in our discussion groups to all the project team at Ofcom and everyone at Ipsos MORI who helped with recruitment, fieldwork and analysis of findings. © 2012 Ipsos MORI – all rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research objectives ........................................................................ 1 1.3 Key areas covered by the research ................................................. 1 1.4 Methodology and participants .......................................................... 2 1.5 Analysis and reporting ..................................................................... 3 2. Key findings ............................................................................ 6 3. Background to consumer usage............................................... 9 3.1 Perceptions and attitudes towards post ........................................... 9 3.2 Usage and relationships with post ................................................. 10 4. Awareness and experience of services .................................. 14 4.1 Different types of awareness and interest in services ...................... 14 4.2 Expectations and confusion around key services ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal Educational School Supplies
    Solicitation 19-05 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL SUPPLIES Proposal Office Depot Proposal Region 4 ESC Solicitation 19-05 for Educational School Supplies Texas Regional Print Facility 2230 North Highway 360 Grand Prairie, TX 75050 Our dedicated team of Texas-based print professionals is proud to prepare this proposal to Region 4 ESC’s Evaluation Team for review. Educational School Supplies 19‐05 January 22, 2019 Region 4 Education Service Center 7145 West Tidwell Road Houston, TX 77095 Dear Region 4 ESC Review Committee: We appreciate the opportunity to present you with our comprehensive proposal to Solicitation 19‐05 for Educational School Supplies. Our team has prepared a complete package that will demonstrate our capabilities to provide School Supplies to Region 4 ESC & participating public agencies with unparalleled service, expertise, and unprecedented value and savings. Our team believes our RFP response demonstrates our passion for your business, our enthusiasm to understand and exceed your expectations, and our desire to present a sustainable offer that will allow for the success and growth of all parties. New contract innovations include: Expanded Educational Solutions & Capabilities Increased School Core list by over 1000 items from our current contract offering Innovation pricing strategies to align with the shift in public procurement trends Customizable Core list capabilities for meaningful added values Enhanced Rebate Incentives For more than 30 years Office Depot has been committed to our customers by providing best‐in‐class products and services. Our collective team is dedicated and aligned to the success of Region 4 ESC and all the agencies associated with this contract.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS Annual Report 1 9 9 4
    TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS Annual Report 1 9 9 4 Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 1994 CD-ROM: August 1994 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Rolf R. Schmitt Editor-in-Chief TRANSPORTATION Terry D. Feinberg Managing Editor Federico Peña, Secretary BUREAU OF Major Contributors: TRANSPORTATION Kathleen M. Bradley Volpe National Transportation Systems Center STATISTICS Shih Miao Chin Oak Ridge National Laboratory 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 2104 Washington, D.C. 20590 Stacy C. Davis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Main Number: 202-366-DATA Douglas C. Frechtling George Washington University Fax: 202-366-3640 Statistical Information: 800-853-1351 John W. Fuller University of Iowa Philip N. Fulton Bureau of Transportation Statistics T.R. Lakshmanan, Director David L. Greene Oak Ridge National Laboratory Robert A. Knisely, Deputy Director Patricia S. Hu Oak Ridge National Laboratory Rolf R. Schmitt, Associate Director for Analysis and Data Development Alan Pisarski Consultant Philip N. Fulton, Associate Director Michael A. Rossetti Volpe National Transportation Systems Center for Data User Services Lorelei S. Evans, Administrative Other Contributors: Officer Philip Barbato Office of the Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth V. Ellis, Secretary Patricia Beardsley Federal Aviation Administration Lonn Henrichsen, Senior Technology Advisor (Acting) Louann M. Hall National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Terry Feinberg, Managing Editor Bruce D. Spear Volpe National Transportation Systems Center EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he Transportation Statistics Annual Report is a summary of the state of the transportation system and its consequences, the quality of statistics used to characterize the transportationT system, and planned efforts by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) to improve the quality of the statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide V16
    User Guide V16 Condition 9 Access Services for Inward Mail Centres 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT HISTORY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 TABLE OF FIGURES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 1. OVERVIEW OF CONDITION 9 ACCESS SERVICES ------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 1.1 SERVICE STANDARD ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 1.2 ACCESS SERVICE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 1.3 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1615 2. ENTRY QUALIFICATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1716 2.1 MINIMUM ENTRY REQUIREMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1716 2.2 POSTCODE AREA COVERAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1716 2.3 ADDRESSING STANDARDS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1716 3. INDICIA FOR ACCESS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1918 3.1 INDICIA FOR ACCESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Manifest Appendices
    CBP Export Manifest Appendix L – Schedule D Export Code February 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Schedule D Classification Of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Districts And Ports For U.S. Foreign Trade Statistics. This Appendix Provides A Complete Listing Of Valid Port Codes. Port Codes Code Port 1 Northeast Region 0101 Portland, Maine 0102 Bangor, Maine 0103 Eastport, Maine 0104 Jackman, Maine 0105 Vanceboro, Maine 0106 Houlton, Maine 0107 Fort Fairfield, Maine 0108 Van Buren, Maine 0109 Madawaska, Maine 0110 Fort Kent, Maine 0111 Bath, Maine 0112 Bar Harbor, Maine 0114 Manchester, New Hampshire 0115 Calais, Maine 0118 Limestone, Maine 0121 Rockland, Maine 0122 Jonesport, Maine 0127 Bridgewater, Maine 0131 Portsmouth, New Hampshire 0132 Belfast, Maine 0150 Border Patrol Sector, Hodgdon, Maine 0151 Houlton Border Patrol, Houlton, Maine 0152 Searsport, Maine 0153 Jackman Border Patrol, Jackman, Maine 0154 Rangeley Border Patrol, Rangeley, Maine 0155 Van Buren Border Patrol, Van Buren, Maine 0156 Fort Fairfield Border Patrol, Fort Fairfield, Maine 0157 Calais Border Patrol, Calais, Maine 0181 Lebanon Airport, New Hampshire 0182 Manchester User Fee Airport, New Hampshire 0201 St. Albans, Vermont 0203 Richford, Vermont Appendix L – Schedule D Port Codes E-1 Code Port 0206 Beecher Falls, Vermont 0207 Burlington, Vermont 0209 Derby Line, Vermont 0210 Newport, Vermont 0211 Norton, Vermont 0212 Highgate Springs/Alburg, Vermont 0214 Swanton, Vermont 0221 Northeast Region, Boston, Massachusetts 0250 Border Patrol Sector, Swanton, Vermont 0251 Swanton Border
    [Show full text]