Myr 2006 Humanitarian Appeal.Pdf (English)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mid-Year Review Version: 3.1 Date: 20 July 2006 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: • strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); • resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); • coordinated programme implementation; • joint monitoring and evaluation; • revision, if necessary; and • reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region and includes the following elements: • a common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; • an assessment of needs; • best, worst, and most likely scenarios; • stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; • a clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; • prioritised response plans; and • a framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team. This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes UN agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Move ment, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. Non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can be included, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is to be presented to donors in July 2006. Donors provide resources to appealing agencies di rectly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2006: AARREC CESVI GSLG OCHA UNAIDS AASAA CHFI HDO OCPH UNDP ABS CINS HI ODAG UNDSS Abt Associates CIRID HISAN - WEPA OHCHR UNESCO ACF/ACH/AAH CISV Horn Relief PARACOM UNFPA ACTED CL IFRC PARC UN-HABITAT ADRA CONCERN INTERSOS PHG UNHCR Africare COOPI IOM PMRS UNICEF AGROSPHERE CORD IRC PRCS UNIFEM AHA CPAR IRD PSI UNMAS ANERA CRS IRIN PU UNODC ARCI CUAMM JVSF RFEP UNRWA ARM CW MALAO SADO UPHB AVSI DCA MCI SC-UK VETAID CADI DRC MDA SECADEV VIA CAM EMSF MDM SFCG VT CARE ERM MENTOR SNNC WFP CARITAS EQUIP MERLIN SOCADIDO WHO CCF FAO NA Solidarités WVI CCIJD GAA (DWH) NNA SP WR CEMIR Int’l GH NRC STF ZOARC CENAP OA Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 EXAMPLES OF KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN 2006 ....................................................................................... 2 HUMANITARIAN REFORM IN 2006 ......................................................................................................... 6 How the cluster leadership approach fills gaps and strengthens sector coordination.......................... 6 Strengthening the Humanitarian Coordinator System: individuals who can deliver effective leadership in humanitarian emergencies........................................................................................................ 6 Faster and more equitable funding: the Central Emergency Response Fund...................................... 6 THE CONSOLIDATED APPEAL PROCESS AND THE HUMANITARIAN REFORM ....................................................... 7 FLASH APPEALS: LESSONS LEARNED......................................................................................................... 7 NEEDS ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIC MONITORING ........................................................................................ 9 NGOS AND THE RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT MOVEMENT IN APPEALS.................................................... 10 FUNDING AT MID-2006..................................................................................................................... 12 Funding in proportion to donor GDP........................................................................................... 15 Funding per beneficiary ............................................................................................................. 16 Funding per sector..................................................................................................................... 17 Funding ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the CAP........................................................................................ 17 BURUNDI ............................................................................................................................................ 19 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................................... 21 CHAD ................................................................................................................................................ 23 CÔTE D'IVOIRE..................................................................................................................................... 25 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO..................................................................................................... 27 GREAT LAKES REGION ........................................................................................................................... 29 GUINEA ............................................................................................................................................. 31 HORN OF AFRICA ................................................................................................................................. 33 LIBERIA ............................................................................................................................................... 35 NEPAL................................................................................................................................................ 37 OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY ............................................................................................................ 39 REPUBLIC OF CONGO ............................................................................................................................ 41 ii i zzzzz Mid-Year Review: Humanitarian Appeal 2006 SOMALIA ............................................................................................................................................ 43 SUDAN............................................................................................................................................... 45 UGANDA............................................................................................................................................ 47 WEST AFRICA ...................................................................................................................................... 49 ZIMBABWE .......................................................................................................................................... 51 TIMOR-LESTE FLASH APPEAL .................................................................................................................... 53 GUINEA-BISSAU FLASH APPEAL................................................................................................................ 55 ETHIOPIA ............................................................................................................................................ 57 INDONESIA EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE PLAN................................................................................................. 59 NORTH CAUCASUS (RUSSIAN FEDERATION) TRANSITIONAL WORKPLAN ............................................................ 61 APPEAL FOR IMPROVING HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE CAPACITY: CLUSTER 2006.................................................. 63 ANNEX I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ 65 ANNEX II. 2006 CONSOLIDATED & FLASH APPEALS: SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING PER SECTOR ................. 70 ANNEX III. 2006 CONSOLIDATED & FLASH APPEALS: SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING PER APPEAL .................. 71 iv zzzzz Mid-Year Review: Humanitarian Appeal 2006 I NTRODUCTION Seventeen consolidated appeals and two flash countries offer updates of the contexts and causes appeals in 2006 bring together key organisations of humanitarian need, amend their strategic on the ground – non-governmental organisations, response plans and specific projects as needed, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, the and summarise achievements to date. United Nations, and other international organisations – to present strategic action plans In the midst of a major new round of humanitarian and detailed project proposals for the world’s reforms, the basic rationale of the consolidated largest and most acute humanitarian crises. Their appeal process – part of