DOCSLIB.ORG

The Arabic Broken Plural John J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Arabic Broken Plural John J University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series Linguistics January 1990 Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural John J. McCarthy University of Massachusetts, Amherst, [email protected] Alan Prince Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/linguist_faculty_pubs Part of the Morphology Commons, Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons, and the Phonetics and Phonology Commons Recommended Citation McCarthy, John J. and Prince, Alan, "Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural" (1990). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 11. 10.1007/BF00208524 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Linguistics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Foot and Word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic Broken Plural Author(s): John J. McCarthy and Alan S. Prince Source: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2 (May, 1990), pp. 209-283 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4047699 Accessed: 25/06/2009 18:28 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. http://www.jstor.org JOHN J. MCCARTHY AND ALAN S. PRINCE FOOT AND WORD IN PROSODIC MORPHOLOGY: THE ARABIC BROKEN PLURAL* This article proposes a theory of PROSODIC DOMAIN CIRCUMSCRIPTION, by means of which rules sensitive to morphologicaldomain may be restrictedto a prosodically characterized(sub-)domain in a word or stem. The theory is illustratedprimarily by a comprehensiveanalysis of the Arabic broken plural; it is further supportedby analysisof a numberof processesfrom other languages,yielding a formaltypology of domain-circumscriptioneffects. The resultsobtained here dependon, and therefore confirm,two centralprinciples of ProsodicMorphology: (1) the ProsodicMorphology Hypothesis,which requiresthat templatesbe expressedin prosodic, not segmental terms; and (2) the TemplateSatisfaction Condition, which requiresthat all elements in templatesare satisfiedobligatorily. 1. INTRODUCTION The study of the relationshipbetween morphology and phonology has played an importantrole in recent linguisticinvestigations. On the one hand, work in the theory of Lexical Phonology speaks to the problem of phonologicalrule applicationin the course of a morphologicalderivation. On the other, the body of researchon templaticmorphology shows the essential role played by phonologicalstructure in capturingmorphological regularities. The theory of ProsodicMorphology developed in McCarthyand Prince (1986, 1988, forthcominga, b) advancesseveral proposalsabout the basic characterof phonologicalstructure and its consequencesfor morphology. Three fundamentaltheses are: (i) Prosodic Morphology Hypothesis. Templates are defined in terms of the authenticunits of prosody:mora (,u), syllable (a), foot (F), prosodicword (W), and so on. (ii) TemplateSatisfaction Condition. Satisfaction of templaticcon- straints is obligatory and is determined by the principles of prosody, both universaland language-specific. (iii) Prosodic Circumscriptionof Domains. The domain to which * We are indebted to Mark Aronoff, A. R. Ayoub, M. G. Carter, Morris Halle, Michael Kenstowicz,Armin Mester, and three anonymousreviewers for valuablecomments on this article.Special thanks go to LindaLombardi for a very close readingof the entiremanuscript that contributedmuch to the content and exposition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 209-283, 1990. ? 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 210 JOHN J. MCCARTHY AND ALAN S. PRINCE morphologicaloperations apply may be circumscribedby pros- odic criteria as well as by the more familiar morphological ones. In particular,the minimalword within a domain may be selected as the locus of morphologicaltransformation in lieu of the whole domain. We will elaborate considerablyon these principlesbelow, focusing parti- cularlyon prosodiccircumscription. New developmentsin linguistictheory often bringillumination to long- standing descriptive problems, while at the same time exposing new difficultiesat a more subtle and abstractlevel. So it is with the Arabic brokenplural. In traditionalaccounts like that of Wright(1971: 191-233), pluralformation has all the propertiesof a poorly understoodor perhaps even chaotic process, requiringa dense taxonomyof 31 pluraltypes, each correspondingto as many as 11 singulartypes. The theory of CV-based templatic morphologyhas made considerableinroads into this apparent complexity, isolating a small set of formationalprocesses and unifying a fair number of traditionallydistinct patterns under a single template (McCarthy1979, 1981). But, as Hammond(1988) has observed, the stan- dard conception of templatic morphology brings with it a major new liability,the problemof transferringvarious characteristics from the singu- lar to the broken plural. This fundamentalproblem turns out to be intrac- table in CV-templatetheories, including(as we will show) the one pro- posed by Hammond. Prosodic Morphologyoffers a new perspectiveon the problem, and it is a goal of this article to demonstratehow the principalfeatures of the broken plural phenomenon follow directly from its characterizationin prosodic terms. In particular,it will emerge that the correct analysisof the transferproblem goes hand in hand with a wide generalizationover productiveplural types. We propose that the centralplural-forming strat- egy of the languageparses out an initial minimalword from the base - a prosodicallycircumscribed domain - and maps the contents of that mini- mal word onto an iambic foot. The broken plural, then, makes a full, systematicuse of the categoriesand operationsprovided by the theory of Prosodic Morphology,providing a particularlyinteresting test case and a robust new source of evidence for the theory. To secure our empiricalclaims, we have collected all nouns forming broken pluralsin the first half of Wehr (1971), the authoritativeEnglish- lang-uagedictionary of Modern Standardor Literary Arabic. The data base contains a total of about 3500 singular/pluralpairs, when doublets are considered, and should be more than adequate for establishingthe actual role and weight of the various patterns. Although most reference PROSODIC MORPHOLOGY 211 grammars,like Wright (1971), deal with Classical Arabic, while Wehr recordsthe contemporaryliterary language, the differencesbetween these two sources of evidence are negligible; our experience is that the corre- spondence is nearly exact except for certainvery rare pluralpatterns that have fallen into disuse. Furthermore,our investigationhas been much aided by the penetrating and exhaustive treatment of this problem by Levy (1971). This article will touch on virtuallyall the broken plural phenomena in Arabic and give a full accountof the dominantregularities of the system, aimingto achieve a match between theory and observationthat improves significantlyon previouswork. The articleis organizedas follows. Section 2 lays out the basic facts of the brokenplural and closely relateddiminutive systems and presents our analysisof them informally.Section 3 develops the formaltheory of prosodiccircumscription and appliesit to the descrip- tive problems of the Arabic plural and diminutive in all their detail. Section 4 reviews the shortcomingsof previous approaches,focusing on that of Hammond (1988). Section 5 treats issues that are ancillaryto the main thrustof our analysis;the conclusionbriefly summarizes the results. 2. THE BROKEN PLURAL AND DIMINUTIVE IN OUTLINE 2.1. The Large-scaleStructure of the Arabic Plural Traditionalgrammars of Arabic distinguishbetween two modes of plural formation, the broken plural and the sound plural. The broken plural primarilyinvolves internalmodification of the singularstem, as in nafslnu- fuus 'soul/pl.' or jundubljanaadib'locust/pl.'; the sound plural is formed by suffixationof masculine+uun or feminine +aat to a usuallyunchanged stem, as in (1)1,2 1 We will use the followingtranscription for the Arabicconsonants. h and ? are pharyngeals and t, d, s, z denote the emphatic (pharyngealized) consonants. t k q h b d j ? f
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Phonology and Morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan Language
    The Phonology and Morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan Language Item Type Thesis Authors Holton, Gary Publisher University of California Ph.D. dissertation Download date 29/09/2021 10:31:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6806 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara The Phonology and Morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan Language A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Gary Holton Committee in charge: Professor Marianne Mithun, Chairperson Professor Wallace Chafe Professor Susanna Cumming Professor Michael Krauss August 2000 The dissertation of Gary Holton is approved _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Committee Chairperson August 2000 ii August 1, 2000 Copyright by Gary Holton 2000 iii VITA October 12, 1964 — born — Norfolk, Virginia 1986 — B.S., mathematics, University of Alaska Fairbanks 1987 — M.S., mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1997 — M.A., linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara APPOINTMENTS 1999 — Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks PUBLICATIONS 1999. Categoriality of property words in a switch-adjective language. Linguistic Typology 3(3).341-60. 1997. Grammatical Relations in Tobelo. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara. 1996. Bibliography of Language and Language Use in North and Central Maluku. (Southeast Asia Paper no. 40). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Center for Southeast Asian Studies. SELECTED PRESENTATIONS 2000. Tone and intonation in Tanacross. Workshop on Athabaskan Prosody, June 9, Moricetown, B.C. 1999. Remarks on Tanacross tone. Alaska Anthropological Association, April 1-3. Fairbanks, Alaska. 1998. Acoustic correlates of the fortis/lenis distinction in Tanacross fricatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grammar of Words
    www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Series editors Keith Brown, Eve V. Clark, April McMahon, Jim Miller, and Lesley Milroy The Grammar of Words www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com O XFORD T EXTBOOKS IN L INGUISTICS General editors: Keith Brown, University of Cambridge; Eve V. Clark, Stanford University; April McMahon, University of Sheffield; Jim Miller, University of Auckland; Lesley Milroy, University of Michigan This series provides lively and authoritative introductions to the approaches, methods, and theories associated with the main subfields of linguistics. P The Grammar of Words An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology by Geert Booij A Practical Introduction to Phonetics Second edition by J. C. Catford Meaning in Language An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics Second edition by Alan Cruse www.IELTS4U.blogfa.comPrinciples and Parameters An Introduction to Syntactic Theory by Peter W. Culicover Semantic Analysis A Practical Introduction by Cliff Goddard Cognitive Grammar An Introduction by John R. Taylor Linguistic Categorization Third edition by John R. Taylor I Pragmatics by Yan Huang The Grammar of Words An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology Geert Booij www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan South Korea Poland Portugal Singapore Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Title: Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology Author
    cover file:///D:/Documents%20and%20Settings/superstar/Mes%20document... Cover title: Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology author: Trask, R. L. publisher: Taylor & Francis Routledge isbn10 | asin: print isbn13: 9780203696026 ebook isbn13: 9780203695111 language: English subject Phonetics--Dictionaries, Grammar, Comparative and general--Dictionaries.--Phonology , Gramática comparada y general--Fonología--Diccionarios, Phonetics, Phonology. publication date: 1996 lcc: P216.T73 1996eb ddc: 414/.03 subject: Phonetics--Dictionaries, Grammar, Comparative and general--Dictionaries.--Phonology , Gramática comparada y general--Fonología--Diccionarios, Phonetics, Phonology. cover Page i A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology Written for students of linguistics, applied linguistics and speech therapy, this dictionary covers over 2,000 terms in phonetics and phonology. In addition to providing a comprehensive yet concise guide to an enormous number of individual terms, it also includes an explanation of the most important theoretical approaches to phonology. Its usefulness as a reference tool is further enhanced by the inclusion of pronunciations, notational devices and symbols, earliest sources of terms, suggestions for further reading, and advice with regard to usage. R.L.Trask is Lecturer in Linguistics in the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences at the University of Sussex. His previous publications include A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics (1993), Language Change (1994) and Language: The Basics (1995). page_i Page ii This page intentionally left blank. page_ii Page iii A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology R.L.Trask London and New York 1 of 246 10/04/2010 11:56 cover file:///D:/Documents%20and%20Settings/superstar/Mes%20document... page_iii Page iv First published 1996 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-16 Inflection in Toposa, a Vso Language in Morpho-Syntactic
    Occasional Papers in Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2 (2004), 1-16 INFLECTION IN TOPOSA, A VSO LANGUAGE IN MORPHO-SYNTACTIC THEORY Helga Schroeder University of Nairobi This paper presents a morpho-syntactic approach to inflection as suggested under the new Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1993/1995). The language under consideration is Toposa, an Eastern Nilotic language which is highly inflectional and derivational. It belongs to the Teso-Turkana subgroup of Eastern Nilotic and is spoken in the south-eastern corner of Southern Sudan. Firstly, the paper deals with inflection in a VSO language and suggests that the order of the tense and agreement heads is alternated. The change in the order of heads is morphologically motivated by the tense tonal features of the language. Secondly, it makes a choice between the agreement analysis and the subject incorporation theory, showing that the latter theory reflects more accurately the reality of Toposa data. Thirdly, it considers the role of the overt NP in the subject incorporation theory. It concludes with the claim that the occurrence of personal pronouns carries a [+focus] feature. 1. Introduction This paper discusses inflection in a VSO language and proposes that the order of the tense and agreement heads has to be changed, which has also been suggested by Ouhalla (1991) as a typical property for VSO languages. In Toposa the alternation of the heads is motivated by the morphological features of a tonal tense suprafix. Thus, the assumption that all VSO languages have an underlying SVO structure held, by Edmonds (1985), Koopman (1984), Creider (1989), and Carnie & Guilfoyle (2000), is refuted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functional Load of Tone in Hausa
    Brown Bag Lunch Leibniz-ZAS 08-10-2020 Many Hands or Many Cooks? The Functional Load of Tone in Tonal Languages Nicholas Rolle slides at nicholasrolle.com/output (at top) Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone 3. English Intonation 2 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 1. T1 m ‘mother’ 2. T2 m ‘numb’ 3. T3 mā ‘horse’ 4. T4 má ‘curse’ 2. Yaitepecǎ Chatino Inflectional tone à 3. English Intonation 3 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 4 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 5 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 6 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 7 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 8 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone (Rasch 2015) 3. English Intonation 9 Pitch – Different roles in different systems 1. Mandarin Contrast different lexical items 2. Yaitepec Chatino Inflectional tone 3. English Intonation • Imperative with the ‘calling contour‘ Jeong & Condoravdi (2018) • Felicitous with mnemonic: Remember to feed the cats! H* ꜜH-L% • Infelicitous with command: Hand in the assignment by Friday! cf.
    [Show full text]
  • With a Greater Insight Intothe Structures and Patternsof English
    1 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 021 214 24 AL 001 318 By- Smith, Henry Lee, Jr.; Sustakoski, Henry J. A LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO ENGLISH.VOLUME ONE. REVISED EDITION. State Univ. of New York, Buffalo. Dept. ofAnthropology and Linguistics. Spons Agency-Office of Education (DHEW),Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. Repor t No- CRP-1856 Bureau No- BR- 5- 0668 Pub Date Aug 64 Note- 236p. EDRS Price MF-$1.00 HC-$9.52 *HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, *INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS *LINGUISTICS Descri tors-*ENGLISH, GRADES MORPHOLOGY (LANGUAGES), ORAL COMMUNICATION,PARALINGUISTICS PHONOLOGY, SECONDARY This handbook, based on an integratedlinguistic analysis of the Englishlanguage, was designed toprovide high school studentswith a greater insight intothe structures and patternsof English. (See related documentAL 001 320 for a description of the Buffalo EnglishLinguistics Project.) The seven unitsof Volume I, which are intended to cover thefirst semester of the school year, treatthe following areas--(1) the general concepts oflinguistics and culture, and thescientific approach to their study, (2) thedevelopment of language, English and itsdialects, English as a world language, and the study ofEnglish, (3) English phonology, based on anaspectual analysis, (4) paralanguage and kinesics,(5) oral communication, (6)morphophonics, and (7) morphemics. A general pre-test,included in the student's preface, teststhe student's knowledge of English as it istraditionally presented in the areasof spelling. puctuation, parts of speech,and sentence parts. Furth,...r testsand quizzes are included in all the units. This volume is followed byVolume Two for the second semester (see AL 001 319). (AMM) A LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO ENGLISH Revised Edition I. VOLUM ONE EDUCATION & WELFARE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Derivational Morphological Processes in English, Hausa, Igala And
    World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development WWJMRD 2017; 3(12): 425-439 www.wwjmrd.com International Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Selected Derivational Morphological Processes in Refereed Journal Indexed Journal English, Hausa, Igala and Some other Languages of UGC Approved Journal Impact Factor MJIF: 4.25 the World e-ISSN: 2454-6615 Unubi, Sunday Abraham Unubi, Sunday Abraham, Yusuf, Sadiya Department of Igala Language and Culture, Kogi State College Abstract of Education, Ankpa, Nigeria This article investigates selected derivational morphological processes in English, Hausa, Igala and some other languages of the world. Morphological processes are a means of changing a word base or Yusuf, Sadiya Department of Hausa root to adjust its meaning and to fit into different syntactic and communicational contexts. To achieve Language, School of this in a language, linguists usually utilise certain tools called morphemes or affixes or word- Languages, Kogi State College elements, which are added or attached to the base or root of a word. In this article, the researchers of Education, Ankpa, Nigeria have arduously and ardently examined these languages to bring out their rich and interesting morphological processes. We have found out that derivational morphology, which is concerned with forming new lexemes, i.e. words that differ either in syntactic category or in meaning from their bases, is extremely productive in languages. Keywords: morphology, derivational morphology, morphological processes Introduction This paper treats derivational morphological processes, as selected and studied in English, Hausa, Igala and some other languages of the world. As a matter of fact, morphological processes are unique and interesting phenomena in the study of languages of the world, and they usually catch the attention of linguists.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Sciences & Humanities
    Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 25 (3): 1139 - 1166 (2017) SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES Journal homepage: http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/ Morphological Features of Siquijodnon-Cebuano Language Bantawig, R. B.* and Maraño, F. B. Siquijor State College, North Poblacion, Larena, Siquijor, Philippines ABSTRACT This paper delves into the morphological features of Siquijodnon-Cebuano language. Using descriptive research methodology and adapting the linguistic theory, Contextualisation Lexicalisation, the study broadly examines free morphemes, bound morphemes and other morphological features of the Siquijodnon language. Qualitative data were taken from written folk literary works, documentaries, transcripts and oral traditions of selected Siquijodnon folks/informants who were chosen through convenient purposive sampling. They were gathered through snowball and/or Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA), interview and videotaping. The units of analysis include the linguistic morphological features: free morphemes, bound morphemes and other morphological phenomena of a language. The data were analysed in the framework of Congruent Lexicalisation and interpreted through interpretive analysis. The research instrument is an interview guide. Considering the aforementioned findings, it is concluded that Siquijodnon-Cebuano is a rule-governed language, which certainly shares a number of morphological features with English and other prevalent languages or dialects. The results also manifest the essential contribution of affixation in establishing inflectional bound tense-marking morphemes and derivational bound from class-marking morphemes. They further conclude that Siquijodnon encounters with other language speakers, brought about by colonisation, greatly influenced the morphological development of their language. Hence, the Siquijodnon language is a twinskin of Siquijor Island’s local identity, which likewise holds a utilitarian significance for its folk literary, historical, cultural and socio-cultural heritage and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Theory of Morphology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs)
    Aspects of the Theory of Morphology ≥ Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 146 Editors Walter Bisang Hans Henrich Hock Werner Winter Mouton de Gruyter Berlin · New York Aspects of the Theory of Morphology by Igor Mel’cˇuk edited by David Beck Mouton de Gruyter Berlin · New York Mouton de Gruyter (formerly Mouton, The Hague) is a Division of Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin. The publication of this volume was made possible by the generous financial support of (i) the Alexander Humboldt Foundation, Germany and (ii) the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Aid to Scholarly Publications Programme, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Țȍ Printed on acid-free paper which falls within the guidelines of the ANSI to ensure permanence and durability. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mel’cˇuk, Igor, 1932Ϫ Aspects of the theory of morphology / by Igor Mel’cˇuk ; edited by David Beck. p. cm. Ϫ (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs ; 146) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-3-11-017711-4 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 3-11-017711-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Grammar, Comparative and general Ϫ Morphology. I. Beck, David, 1963Ϫ II. Title. III. Series. P241.M45 2006 4151.9Ϫdc22 2005026841 ISBN-13: 978-3-11-017711-4 ISBN-10: 3-11-017711-0 ISSN 1861-4302 Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at Ͻhttp://dnb.ddb.deϾ.
    [Show full text]
  • ENG-509 (Descriptive Notes Lesson 1 To
    MORPHOLOGY AND SYTANX (ENG509) Notes based on Short Question Lesson 1 to 15 Q Define the term Morphology. The term morphology was first coined by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749– 1832). It is derived from Greek: morph- means ‘shape, form’, Morphology is the study of form or forms. In linguistics “morphology refers to The mental system involved in word formation Or Branch of linguistics that deals with words, their internal structure, and how they are formed. According to Fabregas&Scalise (2012): Morphology is the part of linguistics that studies grammatical properties of words and how words relate to each other in a language. Q What are morphemes? In English grammar and morphology, a morpheme is a meaningful linguistic unit consisting of a word such as dog, or a word element, such as the -s at the end of dogs, that can't be divided into smaller meaningful parts. Morphemes are the smallest units of meaningin a language. They are commonly classified as either free morphemes, which can occur as separate words or bound morphemes, which can't stand alone as words. Many words in English are made up of a single free morpheme. For example, each word in the following sentence is a distinct morpheme: "I need to go now, but you can stay." Put another way, none of the nine words in that sentence can be divided into smaller parts that are also meaningful. Other definitions. ✓ The smallest linguistic pieces with a grammatical function ✓ A morpheme may consist of a word, such as hand ✓ A meaningful piece of a word, such as the -ed of looked ✓ A pairing between sound and meaning Q Define morph.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphemes, Roots and Affixes 28 October 2011 Previously Said
    Morphemes, roots and affixes 28 October 2011 Previously said We think of words as being the most basic, the most fundamental, units through which meaning is represented in language. Words are the smallest free-standing forms that represent meaning. Any word can be cited as an isolated item. It can serve as the headword in a dictionary list. It can be quoted. It can be combined with other words to form phrases and sentences. In general, the word is the smallest unit of sentence composition and the smallest unit that we are aware of when we consciously try to create sentences. However, there are even smaller units that carry the fundamental meanings of a language, and words are made up of these units. These units are morphemes. The properties of morphemes Since morphemes are the smallest carriers of meaning, each word must contain at least one morpheme. The essential point about morphemes is that they cannot be dissected further into smaller meaningful units: they are the smallest ones. The properties which uniquely differentiate morphemes from other linguistic units are these: 1) A morpheme is the smallest unit associated with a meaning. E.g. car, care, carpet, cardigan, caress, cargo, caramel... Do all these words contain the morpheme car? The properties of morphemes 2) Morphemes are recyclable units. One of the most important properties of the morpheme is that it can be used again and again to form many words. E.g. Morpheme care can be used to form? In examples cardigan and caramel is car a morpheme? One way of finding out would be to test whether the remaining material can be used in other words, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Disentangle the Metonymy – Word-Formation Puzzle
    PRIKAZI FLUMINENSIA, god. 30 (2018), br. 1, str. 299-329 299 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Ovaj rad dostupan je za upotrebu pod međunarodnom licencom Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. HOW TO DISENTANGLE THE METONYMy – WORd-fORMATION PUZZLE Mario Brdar METONYMY AND WORD-FORMATION. THEIR INTERACTIONS AND COMPLEMENTATION. Newcastle upone Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017 Introduction guages. Apart from providing a full The book ‘Metonymy and Word- and accessible insight into the phe- Formation. Their Interactions and nomena of word formation and Complementation’ authored by metonymy, the author goes beyond Mario Brdar, proposes an original, the exploration of nouns function- insightful and extremely valuable ing as referential metonymies, and look into the relation between two examines the role of metonymy in linguistic phenomena: metonymy the grammar of also verbs and adjec- and word formation. By revisiting tives, exploring the relation between the role and, even more importantly, metonymy on the one hand, and a the impact of metonymy on the de- series of single (non-concatenative velopment of grammar, this work and concatenative) word-formation contributes to our understanding of processes, on the other. Centrally, he both metonymy, as well as (its role proposes the hypothesis that, differ- within) the development of gram- ently from what has been claimed in matical or, rather, linguistic systems the literature with respect to central as such. Throughout the work, exist- patterns of word-formation, concep- ing theoretical positions are tual metonymy and word formation succinctly and yet very clearly re- are not to be understood as working viewed and productively intertwined in unison and as one automatically with novel theoretical insights and triggering the other.
    [Show full text]