The Story of El Tejon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Robinson V. Salazar 3Rd Amended Complaint
Case 1:09-cv-01977-BAM Document 211 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 125 1 Evan W. Granowitz (Cal. Bar No. 234031) WOLF GROUP L.A. 2 11400 W Olympic Blvd., Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90064 3 Telephone: (310) 460-3528 Facsimile: (310) 457-9087 4 Email: [email protected] 5 David R. Mugridge (Cal. Bar No. 123389) 6 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID R. MUGRIDGE 2100 Tulare St., Suite 505 7 Fresno, California 93721-2111 Telephone: (559) 264-2688 8 Facsimile: (559) 264-2683 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kawaiisu Tribe of Tejon and David Laughing Horse Robinson 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 KAWAIISU TRIBE OF TEJON, and Case No.: 1:09-cv-01977 BAM DAVID LAUGHING HORSE ROBINSON, an 14 individual and Chairman, Kawaiisu Tribe of PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED 15 Tejon, COMPLAINT FOR: 16 Plaintiffs, (1) UNLAWFUL POSSESSION, etc. 17 vs. (2) EQUITABLE 18 KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as ENFORCEMENT OF TREATY 19 Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; TEJON RANCH CORPORATION, a (3) VIOLATION OF NAGPRA; 20 Delaware corporation; TEJON MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, LLC, a Delaware company; COUNTY (4) DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY 21 OF KERN, CALIFORNIA; TEJON IN VIOLATION OF THE 5th RANCHCORP, a California corporation, and AMENDMENT; 22 DOES 2 through 100, inclusive, (5) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY 23 Defendants. DUTY; 24 (6) NON-STATUTORY REVIEW; and 25 (7) DENIAL OF EQUAL 26 PROTECTION IN VIOLATION OF THE 5th AMENDMENT. 27 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 28 1 PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Case 1:09-cv-01977-BAM Document 211 Filed 03/19/12 Page 2 of 125 1 Plaintiffs KAWAIISU TRIBE OF TEJON and DAVID LAUGHING HORSE ROBINSON 2 allege as follows: 3 I. -
Phase I Proposed Finding—Fernandeño Tataviam Band
Phase I - Negative Proposed Finding Femandefi.o Tataviam Band of Mission Indians Prepared in Response to the Petition Submitted to the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs for Federal Acknowledgment as an Indian Tribe w.~R.LeeFleming Director Office of Federal Acknowledgment TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Regulatory Procedures ................................................................................................................. 2 Summary of Administrative Action ............................................................................................ 3 Membership Lists ........................................................................................................................ 4 CONCLUSIONS UNDER THE CRITERIA (25 CFR PART 83.11) ............................................ 5 Criterion 83.11(d) ........................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 Governing Document ............................................................................................................... 6 Governance.............................................................................................................................. -
National Register Nomination for the Security Trust Company
NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Paul Rendes FALL 2016 © 2016 Paul Rendes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING A Project by Paul Rendes Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Lee Simpson __________________________________, Second Reader Rebecca Bunse ____________________________ Date iii Student: Paul Rendes I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Dr. Anne Lindsay Date Department of History iv Abstract of NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING by Paul Rendes This project determines the eligibility of and establishes a historic context for the nomination of the Security Trust Company Bank Building to the National Register of Historic Places as a commercial building, with an accompanying nomination form. Sources of data used in this project include county assessor records, maps, historic and contemporary photographs, city and county histories, city directories, journal and newspaper articles, articles of incorporation, architectural plans, biographical texts, and contemporary literature on historic preservation and architectural history. The Security Trust Company Bank Building is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C. Under Criterion A, the property is eligible for its association with the 1952 Bakersfield earthquake. -
The Grapevine Route the Mexican-American War of 1846
The Grapevine Route The Mexican-American war of 1846 marked the abandonment of the El Camino Viejo route in favor of the Grapevine Route as it was a shorter route. Plus, the San Emigdio Land Grant owners had created a working cattle ranch, and discouraged travel passing through their rancho. This rancho has been under ownership of many different people, including John C. Fremont and his partner, Edward Beale, both heroes of the Mexican-American war. Alexis Godey became the overseer of the rancho, who has a “legend” ranging from being a benefactor to the natives to being a murderer of the natives. (Currently, this rancho area is under the care of the Wind Wolves Preserve. Naturalists lead a 10-mile hike following the historic El Camino Viejo (hiking down from Pine Mt. Club to Preserve). The history of the development of the Grapevine Route cannot be discussed without mention of Edward Fitzgerald Beale. His impact upon the growth and settlement of this area, to his death in 1983, cannot be separated out from the local history. Beale arrived in California in 1846, as a Naval Officer serving under Colonel John C. Fremont during the Mexican war. Beale played a significant role in the lives of the local Indians. While the history of the Federal- Indian relationship in California shares some common characteristics with that of Native people elsewhere in the United States, it is different in many aspects. This difference is important to understanding many of the current issues in the mountains as to how the tribes have been affected. -
Records of the Tejon Ranch Company
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8k361fb No online items Records of the Tejon Ranch Company Finding aid created by Sherman Library and Gardens staff using RecordEXPRESS Sherman Library and Gardens 614 Dahlia Ave. Corona del Mar, California 92625 (949) 673-1880 [email protected] http://www.slgardens.org/ 2019 Records of the Tejon Ranch 2019_02 1 Company Descriptive Summary Title: Records of the Tejon Ranch Company Dates: 1912-1945 Collection Number: 2019_02 Creator/Collector: Tejon Ranchos, Inc.Tejon Ranch Company Extent: 51 document boxes; 21 linear feet, 4 inches; 1 oversize folder; 169 photographs Repository: Sherman Library and Gardens Corona del Mar, California 92625 Abstract: The records of Tejon Ranch includes subject files, internal correspondence files, financial statements, tax files, lease files and photographs. The bulk of the records are from 1933 and later, although a few items date from the 1912 purchase of the ranch by Los Angeles investors. The subjects documented in the records include the governance of the ranch, including the records of the board of manager and board of directors, 1936 incorporation, and the issuance of bonds. The records also document daily operations of the ranch. Prominent subjects includes stock raising, farming, rights-of-way, historic Fort Tejon, hunting and flower viewing permits. Language of Material: English Access Collection is open for research Preferred Citation Records of the Tejon Ranch Company. Sherman Library and Gardens Biography/Administrative History Edward S. Beale, formed Tejon Ranch through the purchase of portions of four Mexican Land Grants – Rancho La Liebre, Rancho el Tejón, Rancho los Alamos y Agua Caliente, Rancho de Castac – the last being purchased in 1866. -
UNLOCKING VALUE OCTOBER 2018 TEJON RANCH HISTORY Safe Harbor Statement
UNLOCKING VALUE OCTOBER 2018 TEJON RANCH HISTORY Safe Harbor Statement Statements in or accompanying this presentation that relate to or are based on plans, projections, expectations, assumptions, future events and results are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Many factors could affect Tejon Ranch Co.’s (“TRC”) actual results, and variances from TRC’s current expectations regarding such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. The potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, market and economic forces, availability of financing for land development activities, competition and success in obtaining various governmental approvals and entitlements for land development activities. For a detailed description of risks and uncertainties that could cause differences please refer to TRC’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. TRC disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on these forward-looking statements. 3 Tejon Ranch at a Glance Diversified real estate development and agribusiness company operating in five business segments Large-scale master planned residential -
A Case Review of an Indian Tribe's Claim to Aboriginal Land in California
McAuliffe: Stolen or Lawful? A Case Review of an Indian Tribe’s Claim to Ab McAuliffe camera ready (Do Not Delete) 12/27/2018 10:11 AM CALIFORNIA WESTERN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 49 FALL 2018 NUMBER 1 STOLEN OR LAWFUL? A CASE REVIEW OF AN INDIAN TRIBE’S CLAIM TO ABORIGINAL LAND IN CALIFORNIA HON. BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 2 I. THE PARTIES IN THE TRIBE’S CASE ............................................. 3 II. THE TRIBE’S CLAIMS TO THE LAND ........................................... 4 A. The Tribe’s Claims Regarding the Right to Occupy ...... 4 B. “Title” to the 270,000 Acres ........................................... 7 III. ABORIGINAL TITLE, THE ACT OF 1851, AND THE TREATY OF GUADALUPE HIDALGO ................................................. 8 A. Aboriginal Title ............................................................... 8 B. Overview of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the 1851 Act .................................................................. 9 C. Cases in Which American Indians Lost the Right of Occupancy Under the 1851 Act ..................... 10 D. The Kawaiisu Lost the Right to Occupy Under the 1851 Act ............................................................ 14 IV. TREATY WITH THE UTAH ........................................................ 15 ∗ Barbara A. McAuliffe is a United States Magistrate Judge for Eastern District of California and was appointed in October 2011. Judge McAuliffe presides over various types of civil cases randomly assigned to her with the parties’ consent, including business litigation, employment, class actions, excessive force civil rights, and other civil rights cases, including the case which is the subject of this article. 1 Published by CWSL Scholarly Commons, 2019 1 California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1 [2019], Art. 2 McAuliffe camera ready (Do Not Delete) 12/27/2018 10:11 AM 2 CALIFORNIA WESTERN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL [Vol. -
Tejon Indian Tribe in 1934
United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR Washington, D.C. 20240 Memorandum To: Amy Dutschke, Regional Director, BIA Pacific Region Through: Kyle Scherer, Deputy Solicitor for Indian Affairs Eric N. Shepard, Associate Solicitor, Division of Indian Affairs John Hay, Acting Assistant Solicitor, Branch of Environment and Lands, Division of Indian Affairs From: Robert S. Hitchcock, Attorney-Advisor, Branch of Environment and Lands, Division of Indian Affairs Subject: Federal Jurisdiction Status of Tejon Indian Tribe in 1934 On August 24, 2016, the Tejon Indian Tribe (“Tejon Tribe” or “Tribe”) submitted an application to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) requesting that the Secretary of the Interior (“Secretary”) acquire land in trust for the Tribe’s benefit (“Application”).1 The Tribe submitted its Application pursuant to Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act (“IRA”) 2 and its implementing regulations.3 This Opinion addresses the statutory authority of the Secretary to acquire land in trust for the Tribe pursuant to Section 5 of the IRA (“Section 5).4 Section 5 authorizes the Secretary to acquire land in trust for “Indians.” 5 Section 19 of the Act (“Section 19”) defines “Indian” to include several categories of persons.6 As relevant here, the first definition includes all persons of Indian descent who are members of “any recognized Indian tribe now under federal jurisdiction” (“Category 1”).7 In 2009, the United States Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) in 1 See Letter, Tejon Indian Tribe to BIA Pacific Regional Office, Request to Take Land Into Trust, (Aug. 24, 2016) (The Tribe’s fee-to-trust Application contained a 19-page Introduction and 39 exhibits totaling over 300 pages). -
Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Tehachapi
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cultural Resources 3.5 Cultural Resources This section describes the cultural and paleontological resources within the cultural resources study area. For this section, the study area is considered concurrent with the Covered Lands. Cultural resources include archaeological, ethnographic, historical, Native American, and architectural resources. 3.5.1 Cultural Resources Setting 3.5.1.1 Prehistoric Chronology The study area is located in the Tehachapi Mountains and southern San Joaquin Valley region, which has received less archaeological attention compared to other areas of the state. The majority of California archaeological work has been concentrated in the Sacramento Delta, Santa Barbara Channel, and central Mojave Desert areas (Moratto 1984). Although knowledge of the prehistory of the study area is limited, enough is known to determine that the archaeological record is broadly similar to south-central California as a whole and evidence of early use of the study area can be inferred from information gathered from the broader region. Initial occupation of the region occurred at least as early as the Paleoindian Period, or prior to about 10,000 years before present (YBP). Evidence of this early use of the region has been revealed by the discovery of characteristic fluted and stemmed points found around the margin of Tulare Lake, in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada, on the Carrizo Plain, and in the Mojave Desert proper. These locations are outside the study area, but they suggest general use of the region during this early time period. Substantial evidence for human occupation of California first occurs during the Middle Holocene, from roughly 7,500 to 4,000 YBP. -
Ethnohistory of the Tejon Indian Tribe
Ethnohistory of the Tejon Indian Tribe John R. Johnson, Ph.D. September, 2016 At the time of European contact, the southern San Joaquin Valley was a region of great linguistic and cultural diversity. At least eight different languages were spoken by the indigenous groups who resided in the valley and surrounding mountains. The Uto-Aztecan language family was represented by three languages, each in a different branch of that family (Golla 2011). The Kitanemuk, speaking a language in the Takic subfamily, were settled along Tejon Creek in the southern Tehachapi Mountains (Anderton 1988; Blackburn and Bean1978). Just to their north were the Kawaiisu, speaking a Numic language related to the Southern Paiute and Ute of the Great Basin. The Tübatulabal resided in the upper Kern River watershed of the southern Sierra Nevada, speaking an isolate language belonging to its own branch within Uto-Aztecan. The Yokuts language family, like Uto-Aztecan, had its greatest linguistic diversity in the southern San Joaquin Region. The Yawelmani in the vicinity of Bakersfield spoke a dialect classified within the principal (Nim) Yokuts branch of the family. Surrounding Buena Vista and Kern lakes were Tulamni and Hometwoli tribes speaking dialects of the Buena Vista Yokuts language. The Palewyami on Poso Creek in the southern Sierra Nevada foothills spoke a Yokuts language, distinct from the others (Whistler and Golla 1986). Neighboring the San Joaquin Valley to the south and west were Chumash groups speaking an interior dialect of Ventureño in the Castac and San Emigdio regions and a language or languages of indeterminate affiliation in the Cuyama Valley and Carrizo Plain (Johnson and Tiley 2015). -
The Public Career of Edward Fitzgerald Beale, 1845-1893
The public career of Edward Fitzgerald Beale, 1845-1893 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Thompson, Gerald Eugene, 1947- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 03:42:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565401 THE PUBLIC CAREER OF EDWARD FITZGERALD BEALE, 1845-1893 by Gerald Eugene Thompson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 8 Copyright 1978 Gerald Eugene Thompson © 1978 GERALD EUGENE THOMPSON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Gerald Eugene Th o m p s o n ________________________ entitled THE PUBLIC CAREER OF EDWARD FITZGERALD BEALE, 1845-1893 be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of P h i l o s o p h y ______________________ Dissertation Director Date As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read this dissertation and agree that it may be presented for final defense. Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent on the candidate’s adequate performance and defense thereof at the final oral examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted' in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. -
Historical Overview of the Los Padres National Forest
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST E. R. (JIM) BLAKLEY Naturalist and Historian of the Santa Earbara Eackcountry and KAREN BARNETTE Cultural Resources Specialist Los Padres National Forest July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 .0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Objectives .................................... 1 1.2 Methods ............. ....................................... 2 1.3 Organization of the Overview .............................. 2 2.0 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 2.1 Introduction .............................................. 4 2.2 Hispanic Period 2.2.1 Early Spanish Explorations ........................ 4 2.2.2 The Missions and the Spanish Colonial Government . Missionization .................................. 8 . Timber Harvesting During the Spanish Period ..... 12 . Spanish Land Grants: the Ortega Concession ..... 13 . mpeditions to the Interior ..................... 14 2.2.3 Mexican Period . Mission Indian Rebellions and Mexican Expeditions to the Interior ..................... 16 . Mexican Land Grants and Secularization .......... 21 2.3 Early American Period ..................................... 28 2.3.1 Conquest' Years .................................... 28 2.3.2 Homestead Period .................................. 35 . Southern Monterey County Coast .................. 35 . Monterey County Interior ........................ 36 . San Luis Obispo County, Lopez Canyon and the Upper Cuyama .................................... 36 . Sisquoc River Valley ............................ 37 . Other Santa Barbara County Fiomesteads