DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIONAL GUARD and RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT (NGRER) Department of Defense

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIONAL GUARD and RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT (NGRER) Department of Defense NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT (NGRER) REPORT EQUIPMENT AND RESERVE GUARD NATIONAL Department of Defense National Guard and Reserve Office of the Under Secretary of Defense FY 2019 Readiness (Personnel and Readiness) Equipment Report for 4000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-4000 Fiscal Year 2019 March 2018 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 (NGRER FY 2019) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2018 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $598,000 in Fiscal Years 2017 - 2018. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $386,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2018Feb07 RefID: 6-DBCAE71 An electronic version of this report can be found at: http://prhome.defense.gov/Readiness/Publications/ Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Introduction 1-1 II. Operational Reserve Component Equipping Process and Associated Challenges 1-2 III. Scope of the Report 1-7 IV. Equipment Shortages 1-8 V. Equipment Procurement 1-9 VI. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-12 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-12 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-13 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-14 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-15 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-15 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-16 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-17 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between Active Component (AC) and RC 2-4 F. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-5 A. Current Status of the Army National Guard 2-5 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 2-10 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 2-11 D. Summary 2-19 Table 1: ARNG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ARNG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ARNG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ARNG National Guard and Reserve Equipment Appropriations (NGREA) Procurements Table 5: ARNG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ARNG FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ARNG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ARNG Significant Major Item Shortages i III. United States Army Reserve Overview 2-20 A. Current Status of the Army Reserve 2-20 B. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 2-26 C. Summary 2-36 Table 1: USAR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USAR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USAR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USAR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USAR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USAR FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USAR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USAR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 3 United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) I. Marine Corps Overview 3-1 A. Marine Corps Planning Guidance 3-1 B. Marine Corps Equipping Policy 3-2 C. Plan to Fill Equipment Shortages in the RC 3-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 3-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 3-2 II. Marine Corps Reserve Overview 3-4 A. Current Status of the Marine Corps Reserve 3-4 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 3-6 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 3-7 D. Summary 3-9 Table 1: USMCR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USMCR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USMCR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USMCR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USMCR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USMCR FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USMCR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USMCR Significant Major Item Shortages ii Chapter 4 United States Navy Reserve (USNR) I. Navy Overview 4-1 A. Navy Planning Guidance 4-1 B. Navy Equipping Policy 4-1 C. Plan to Fill RC Equipment Mobilization Requirements 4-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 4-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 4-4 II. Navy Reserve Overview 4-5 A. Current Status of the Navy Reserve 4-5 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 4-15 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 4-15 D. Summary 4-16 Table 1: USNR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USNR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USNR Service Procurement Program Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USNR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USNR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USNR FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USNR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USNR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 5 United States Air Reserve Components I. United States Air Force Overview 5-1 A. Air Force Planning Guidance 5-1 B. Air Force Equipping Policy 5-2 C. Plan to Fill Modernization Shortages in the RC 5-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 5-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 5-4 II. Air National Guard Overview 5-5 A. Current Status of the Air National Guard 5-5 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 5-18 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 5-18 D. Summary 5-19 Table 1: ANG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ANG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ANG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ANG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ANG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ANG FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers iii Table 7: ANG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ANG Significant Major Item Shortages III. Air Force Reserve Overview 5-20 A. Current Status of the Air Force Reserve 5-20 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 5-28 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 5-28 D. Summary 5-29 Table 1: AFR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: AFR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: AFR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: AFR NGREA Procurements Table 5: AFR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: AFR FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: AFR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: AFR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 6 United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) I. Coast Guard Overview 6-1 A. Coast Guard Planning Guidance 6-2 B. Coast Guard Equipping Policy 6-3 C. Plan to Fill Equipment Shortages in the RC 6-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 6-4 II. Coast Guard Reserve Overview 6-5 A. Current Status of the Coast Guard Reserve 6-5 B. Changes Since the Last NGRER 6-8 C. Future Years Program (FY 2018–FY 2020) 6-8 D. Summary 6-9 Table 1: USCGR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USCGR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USCGR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USCGR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USCGR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USCGR FY 2014 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USCGR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USCGR Significant Major Item Shortages iv Appendix A: Report Requirements, Terminology, and Definitions Appendix B: National Guard Equipment Reporting Requirements Appendix C: Principles of Modernization Appendix D: DoD Report to Congress on Equipment Transparency Report (ETR) Alternatives Appendix E: Points of Contact Appendix F: Acronym Glossary v Chapter 1 Overview I. Introduction The 2018 National Defense Strategy states that we cannot expect success fighting tomorrow’s conflicts with yesterday’s weapons or equipment.1 Until recently, the Budget Control Act (BCA) perpetuated an equipping model that was designed for a Cold War Era strategic reserve and stressed by unpredictable funding, continuous operations, and the rapid pace of technological change. The Congress has just passed a new budget deal that lifts BCA budget caps for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 and FY 2019. Until that deal is fully implemented, the realities of current force hardware will be a factor in war planning. As illustrated in Figure 1-1,2 the value of the Reserve Components (RC) equipment requirements has almost doubled since 2001, reflecting, in part, the emerging requirements for advanced equipment needed to enhance compatibility with the Active Components (AC). During the same time period, funding received by the RC RC Growing Modernization Requirements ($B) through Defense $300 Appropriations and National Guard and $250 Reserve Appropriations $200 (NGREA) remained relatively constant. $150 Historically, the Services’ $100 budget for RC equipment $50 procurement funding is less than 5 percent of the $0 total DoD procurement 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 request. This growth in RC Requirements RC Procurement Funding requirements without a corresponding increase in Figure 1-1. RC Growing Modernization Requirements new procurement funding has increased the proportion of older equipment in the inventory. Sustained operations and a reduction in Operation and Maintenance funding caused additional strain on the readiness of reserve forces. The challenges detailed above are exacerbated by budget reductions stemming from the 2011 BCA. The lack of an adequate stable budget over such a long period of time has been incredibly damaging to the military force, serving to hinder modernization efforts and leading to deteriorating readiness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Time Maintainers Command Makes Strides Hiring Air Reserve Technicians
    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 6 December 2019 Full-time Maintainers Command makes strides hiring Air Reserve Technicians Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC STRENGTHENING YOUR THE COMMAND TEAM, SUPPORTING CHIEF'S NEW YEAR'S YOUR FAMILY CHALLENGE Heroes of the Air Force Reserve, Lt. Gen. Richard Season’s greetings Citizen Airmen! First off, the boss and Scobee high fives Being part of an outstanding team is I want to say thank you. Thank you for all you have done deployed members of an amazing feeling. I am honored to be a his Air Force Reserve throughout the year, and thank you for what you will continue part of this incredible Air Force Reserve family. ( Tech. Sgt. to do in the coming year. team. You, our Airmen, are highly skilled Robert Cloys) Your steadfast service, commitment and sacrifice are com- individuals, and your abilities are magni- mendable, and we couldn’t be more proud of you. fied when you work as a team. A strong The cohesion and effectiveness of command chief and I would like to be We had a couple of rough patches this past year; and without team can accomplish nearly anything. the operations-maintenance team was at every unit’s drill weekend this month a doubt, we will face challenges in the new year. Regardless the I’ve witnessed the achievements of visible to the entire wing. It was clear to personally thank you for all your hard challenge, like always, we will persevere because of Airmen like many great teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo
    Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo by Lt Col Rowayne A. Schatz, USAF This basic doctrine presents the guiding principles of our Service and our view of the opportunities of the future… As airmen, we must understand these ideas, we must cultivate them and, importantly, we must debate and refine these ideas for the future.1 General Michael E. Ryan Chief of Staff, USAF Operation Allied Force, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military operation to compel Serbia to cease hostilities against ethnic Albanians in Kosovo and allow a peacekeeping presence on the ground, was the first major war in history fought exclusively with air power. NATO air forces flew over 38,000 sorties from 24 March through 9 June 1999 to allow NATO to achieve its political objectives in Kosovo.2 Although you may not have heard or read much about them, air mobility forces were key to the success of the air war over Serbia. The air mobility team moved enough airmen and equipment to increase the number of air expeditionary wings in Europe from three to ten, provided aid directly to thousands of Kosovar refugees, and deployed a large US Army contingent to Albania—all at the same time. In the words of Colonel Scott Gray, the USAFE Assistant Director of Operations during Operation Allied Force, "This was a phenomenal success, enabling the forces which forced Milosevic to back down while sustaining the refugees he created until they were able to go home.3 According to AFDD1, "Air and space doctrine is an accumulation of knowledge gained primarily from the study and analysis of experience, which may include actual combat or contingency operations as well as equipment tests or exercises."4 I am a firm believer that doctrine is key to warfighting.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,082,219 B2 Haanpaa Et Al
    US009082219B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,082,219 B2 Haanpaa et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jul. 14, 2015 (54) ORIENTATION INVARIANT OBJECT (52) U.S. Cl. IDENTIFICATION USING MODEL-BASED CPC .............. G06T 15/10 (2013.01); G06K9/0063 IMAGE PROCESSING (2013.01); G06K9/3241 (2013.01); G06T 15/00 (2013.01) (71) Applicant: Cybernet Systems Corporation, Ann (58) Field of Classification Search Arbor, MI (US) CPC .............................. G06K9/0063; G06T 15/10 USPC .......................................... 382/103, 206, 209 (72) Inventors: Douglas Haanpaa, Dexter, MI (US); See application file for complete search history. Charles J. Cohen, Ann Arbor, MI (US); Glenn J. Beach, Grass Lake, MI (US); (56) References Cited Charles J. Jacobus, Ann Arbor, MI (US) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Cybernet Systems Corporation, Ann 3,976,999 A 8, 1976 Moore et al. Arbor, MI (US) 3,992,710 A 11/1976 Gabriele et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (Continued) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Primary Examiner — Gregory M Desire U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, This patent is Subject to a terminal dis Anderson & Citkowski, P.C. claimer. (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 14/242,560 A system for performing object identification combines pose determination, EO/IR sensor data, and novel computer graph (22) Filed: Apr. 1, 2014 ics rendering techniques. A first module extracts the orienta tion and distance of a target in a truth chip given that the target (65) Prior Publication Data type is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Vehicle Technology
    Fighting Vehicle Technology 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 1 5/6/10 12:44 AM ABSTRACT Armoured vehicle technology has evolved ever since the first tanks appeared in World War One. The traditional Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) design focuses on lethality, survivability and mobility. However, with the growing reliance on communications and command (C2) systems, there is an increased need for the AFV design to be integrated with the vehicle electronics, or vetronics. Vetronics has become a key component of the AFV’s effectiveness on the battlefield. An overview of the technology advances in these areas will be explored. In addition, the impact on the human aspect as a result of these C2 considerations will be covered. Tan Chuan-Yean Mok Shao Hong Vince Yew 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 2 5/6/10 12:44 AM Fighting Vehicle Technology 62 and more advanced sub-systems will raise the INTRODUCTION question of how the modern crew is able to process and use the information effectively. On the modern battlefield, armies are moving towards Network-Centric Warfare TECHNOLOGIES IN AN (NCW). Forces no longer fight as individual entities but as part of a larger system. Each AFV entity becomes a node in a network where information can be shared, and firepower can Firepower be called upon request. AFVs are usually equipped with weapon Key to this network fighting capability is the stations for self-protection and the communications and command (C2) system. engagement of targets. Depending on By enabling each force to be plugged into the threat, some are equipped with pintle the C2 system, information can be shared mount systems for light weapons (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps
    OOffffiiccee ooff tthhee SSeeccrreettaarryy ooff DDeeffeennssee OOppeerraattiioonn aanndd MMaaiinntteennaannccee OOvveerrvviieeww FFeebbrruuaarryy 22000077 FFiissccaall YYeeaarr ((FFYY)) 22000088 BBuuddggeett EEssttiimmaatteess TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Page Service by Appropriation......................................................1 MAJOR ACTIVITIES Page O&M Title Summary ............................................................3 Air Operations.......................................................................65 APPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS Base Operations Support .....................................................84 Command, Control, Communications (C3)........................90 Army........................................................................................6 Depot Maintenance ...............................................................95 Navy........................................................................................16 Environmental Programs....................................................101 Marine Corps ........................................................................26 Facilities Sustainment, Repair & Modernization and Air Force................................................................................30 Demolition Programs …………………………………109 Defense-Wide.........................................................................35 Land Forces ..........................................................................112 Reserve Forces.......................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Press Release METKA and Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Join Forces for export to Middle East. Athens, 26.08.2013: METKA S.A. is pleased to announce a significant industrial co- production agreement with Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG (KMW), Europe’s leading manufacturer of highly protected wheeled and tracked military vehicles. KMW chose METKA to supply defined metal structures of the hull and turret for 62 LEOPARD 2 main battle tanks for the Middle East market. The value of the agreement adds up to 56.5 Million Euro and the relevant Contract is scheduled to be signed shortly. METKA and KMW have been business partners in producing LEOPARD 2HEL tanks for the Greek Army since 2003 when the two companies set the basis of their co-operation that included extensive know how transfer and substantial investments on highly sophisticated machinery in METKA’s two factories in Volos. This new agreement is the result of the successful execution of the Greek program that qualified METKA as one of the very few companies that can perform such demanding fabrication works worldwide and, certainly, sets a milestone in their long-term cooperation, particularly with regard to preservation of jobs and know-how in Greece’s Defence Industry. About METKA METKA is a leading international EPC contractor for specialized large-scale energy projects, undertaking the complete range of Engineering, Procurement and Construction activities through to project completion. It is currently executing projects with more than 5,000MW of power generation capacity in 6 different countries (Turkey, Iraq, Algeria, Jordan, Syria and Greece). For additional information please contact: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Cost Efficiency and Readiness of MC-130 Aircrew Training a Case Study
    Dissertation Improving the Cost Efficiency and Readiness of MC-130 Aircrew Training A Case Study Sarah E. Evans This document was submitted as a dissertation in September 2015 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Brien Alkire (Chair), Anthony Rosello, and James Bigelow. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD364.html Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Abstract The MC-130 is a multi-role aircraft which plays a vital role in both times of war and peace as a key enabler of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Defense Budget
    Preface The Overview Book has been published as part of the President’s Annual Defense Budget for the past few years. From FY 1969 to FY 2005, OSD published the “Annual Defense Report” (ADR) to meet 10 USC section 113 requirements. Subsequently, the Overview began to fill this role. The Overview is one part of an extensive set of materials that constitute the presentation and justification of the President’s Budget for FY 2020. This document and all other publications for this and previous DoD budgets are available from the public web site of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller): http://comptroller.defense.gov. The Press Release and Budget Briefing, often referred to as the “Budget Rollout,” and the Program Acquisition Costs by Weapons System book, which includes summary details on major DoD acquisition programs (i.e., aircraft, ground forces programs, shipbuilding, space systems, etc.) are especially relevant. The website for Performance Improvement tables and charts is http://dcmo.defense.gov/Publications/AnnualPerformancePlanandPerformanceReport.aspx. Other background information can be accessed at www.defense.gov. The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $27,000 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses and $14,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019Mar05 RefID: E-DE33FD3 i This Page Intentionally Left Blank. ii Overview – FY 2020 Defense Budget Table of Contents 1. FY 2020 Budget Summary – A Strategy Driven Budget 1-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2018 National Defense Strategy ......................................................................................... 1-2 FY 2020 Budget Request Overview .................................................................................... 1-3 Building a More Lethal Force .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, 2005
    1 108TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 108–553 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4613] together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS JUNE 18, 2004.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 94–301 WASHINGTON : 2004 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 108TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 108–553 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4613] together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS JUNE 18, 2004.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 C O N T E N T S Page Bill Totals ................................................................................................................. 1 Committee Budget Review Process ........................................................................ 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Fiscal Year 2005 Budget Request .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Date 1Ère Page Prolif Papers
    FFooccuuss ssttrraattééggiiqquuee nn°°3355 bbiiss ______________________________________________________________________ The Battle over Fire Support The CAS Challenge and the Future of Artillery ______________________________________________________________________ Elie Tenenbaum October 2012 Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Défense The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With office in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of the European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-083-8 © Ifri – 2012 – All rights reserved All requests for information, reproduction or distribution may be addressed to: [email protected]. Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE 1000 – Bruxelles – BELGIQUE Tel : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tel : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax : +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Website : www.ifri.org “Focus stratégique” Resolving today’s security problems requires an integrated approach. Analysis must be cross-cutting and consider the regional and global dimensions of problems, their technological and military aspects, as well as their media linkages and broader human consequences.
    [Show full text]