DOCSLIB.ORG

JP 3-17 JTTP for Theater Airlift Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JP 3-17 JTTP for Theater Airlift Operations Joint Pub 3-17 Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Theater Airlift Operations 18 July 1995 PREFACE 1. Scope 3. Application This publication provides fundamental a. Doctrine and selected tactics, principles and doctrine for the conduct of techniques, and procedures and guidance aerial delivery and airland delivery established in this publication apply to the operations throughout the range of military commanders of combatant commands, operations. subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these 2. Purpose commands. These principles and guidance also may apply when significant forces of This publication has been prepared one Service are attached to forces of another under the direction of the Chairman Service or when significant forces of one of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets Service support forces of another Service. forth doctrine and selected tactics, techniques, and procedures (JTTP) b. The guidance in this publication is to govern the joint activities and authoritative; as such, this doctrine and performance of the Armed Forces of selected tactics, techniques, and procedures the United States in joint operations will be followed except when, in the as well as the doctrinal basis for US judgment of the commander, exceptional military involvement in multinational circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts and interagency operations. It arise between the contents of this provides military guidance for the publication and the contents of Service exercise of authority by combatant publications, this publication will take commanders and other joint force precedence for the activities of joint forces commanders and prescribes doctrine unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of and selected tactics, techniques, and Staff, normally in coordination with the procedures for joint operations and other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, training. It provides military guidance has provided more current and specific for use by the Armed Forces in guidance. Commanders of forces operating preparing their appropriate plans. It as part of a multinational (alliance or is not the intent of this publication to coalition) military command should follow restrict the authority of the joint force multinational doctrine and guidance ratified commander (JFC) from organizing the by the United States. For doctrine and force and executing the mission in a procedures not ratified by the United States, manner the JFC deems most appropriate commanders should evaluate and follow the to ensure unity of effort in the multinational command’s doctrine and accomplishment of the overall mission. procedures, where applicable. For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: WALTER KROSS Lieutenant General, USAF Director, Joint Staff i Preface Intentionally Blank ii Joint Pub 3-17 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... vii CHAPTER I GENERAL OVERVIEW • Basic Concepts......................................................................................................... I-1 • Categories of Theater Airlift ................................................................................... I-6 • Methods of Airlift Delivery ................................................................................... I-10 • Augmentation of Theater Airlift............................................................................ I-14 • Military Operations Other Than War .................................................................... I-16 • Special Operations ................................................................................................. I-17 CHAPTER II COMMAND AND CONTROL OF THEATER AIRLIFT FORCES • General ................................................................................................................... II-1 • Broad Guidelines ................................................................................................... II-1 • The Joint Air Operations Center ........................................................................... II-1 • The Theater Air Control System ........................................................................... II-2 • Control of Augmenting Forces .............................................................................. II-4 • Command and Control of USTRANSCOM Mobility Forces ............................... II-4 CHAPTER III APPORTIONMENT, ALLOCATION, REQUEST, AND CONTROL OF THEATER AIRLIFT MOVEMENTS • General .................................................................................................................. III-1 • Apportionment ...................................................................................................... III-1 • Allocation and the Joint Movement Center.......................................................... III-1 • Requests ................................................................................................................ III-1 • Validation .............................................................................................................. III-3 • Request Procedures............................................................................................... III-3 • The Army Component System ............................................................................. III-3 • The Marine Corps Component System ................................................................ III-5 • The Air Force Component System ....................................................................... III-7 • The Navy Component System .............................................................................. III-8 • The Special Operations Forces Component System ............................................ III-9 • Control ................................................................................................................ III-10 CHAPTER IV PLANNING THEATER AIRLIFT OPERATIONS • General .................................................................................................................. IV-1 iii Table of Contents • Command Responsibilities ................................................................................... IV-1 • Preliminary Planning ............................................................................................ IV-5 • Plan Development ................................................................................................. IV-5 • Landing Plan ......................................................................................................... IV-6 • Air Movement Plan .............................................................................................. IV-8 • Intelligence Planning .......................................................................................... IV-10 • Operations Security and Counterintelligence Planning ..................................... IV-11 • Command, Control, Communications, and Computer (C4) Systems Planning. IV-11 • Logistics Planning .............................................................................................. IV-12 • Materiel Collection and Classification Planning ............................................... IV-14 • Planning for Enemy Prisoners of War ................................................................ IV-14 • Medical Support Planning .................................................................................. IV-14 • Weather Planning ................................................................................................ IV-14 • Marshalling Plan ................................................................................................. IV-15 • Withdrawal or Restaging Plan ............................................................................ IV-15 CHAPTER V MARSHALLING • General ................................................................................................................... V-1 • Preparations ........................................................................................................... V-1 • Dispersal Procedures ............................................................................................. V-2 • Responsibilities ...................................................................................................... V-3 • Execution ............................................................................................................... V-3 CHAPTER VI AERIAL DELIVERY OPERATIONS • General .................................................................................................................. VI-1 • Responsibilities ..................................................................................................... VI-1 • Airdrop Support Responsibilities ......................................................................... VI-1 • Drop Zone Types .................................................................................................. VI-2 • Drop Zone Criteria and Considerations ............................................................... VI-4 • Drop Zone Surveys ............................................................................................. VI-12 • Separation of Personnel and Equipment ............................................................ VI-13 • Equipment Delivery Operations ......................................................................... VI-13 • Types of Equipment Airdrop .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo
    Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo by Lt Col Rowayne A. Schatz, USAF This basic doctrine presents the guiding principles of our Service and our view of the opportunities of the future… As airmen, we must understand these ideas, we must cultivate them and, importantly, we must debate and refine these ideas for the future.1 General Michael E. Ryan Chief of Staff, USAF Operation Allied Force, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military operation to compel Serbia to cease hostilities against ethnic Albanians in Kosovo and allow a peacekeeping presence on the ground, was the first major war in history fought exclusively with air power. NATO air forces flew over 38,000 sorties from 24 March through 9 June 1999 to allow NATO to achieve its political objectives in Kosovo.2 Although you may not have heard or read much about them, air mobility forces were key to the success of the air war over Serbia. The air mobility team moved enough airmen and equipment to increase the number of air expeditionary wings in Europe from three to ten, provided aid directly to thousands of Kosovar refugees, and deployed a large US Army contingent to Albania—all at the same time. In the words of Colonel Scott Gray, the USAFE Assistant Director of Operations during Operation Allied Force, "This was a phenomenal success, enabling the forces which forced Milosevic to back down while sustaining the refugees he created until they were able to go home.3 According to AFDD1, "Air and space doctrine is an accumulation of knowledge gained primarily from the study and analysis of experience, which may include actual combat or contingency operations as well as equipment tests or exercises."4 I am a firm believer that doctrine is key to warfighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Cost Efficiency and Readiness of MC-130 Aircrew Training a Case Study
    Dissertation Improving the Cost Efficiency and Readiness of MC-130 Aircrew Training A Case Study Sarah E. Evans This document was submitted as a dissertation in September 2015 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Brien Alkire (Chair), Anthony Rosello, and James Bigelow. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD364.html Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Abstract The MC-130 is a multi-role aircraft which plays a vital role in both times of war and peace as a key enabler of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Commando JOURNAL Spring 2012 Vol
    Educating their Children Providing full college educations to the children of fallen Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps special operations personnel since 1980. Funding provided for tuition, books, fees, room and board. Wounded SOF Warrior Support 3URYLGLQJLPPHGLDWH¿QDQFLDO assistance to severely wounded special operations personnel. SOWF has provided over $1.4 million in support of wounded SOF warriors since 2005. CFC # 11455 www.specialops.org Air Commando JOURNAL Spring 2012 Vol. 1, No 3 9 Tragedy Strikes: Laos Site 85 12 Operation Kingpin: Son Tay Raid 16 Element of Surprise 45 The Year of the Dragon: Part I 18 Eagle Claw: Successful Failed Mission 4 Foreword: 27 General (ret) Charles Holland USAF Operation Urgent Fury: Invasion of Grenada 5 Chindit Chatter: Editorial 40 6 Match Made by Pinatubo: Reunion Updates Case Study in Jointness 8 ON THE Hotwash: Letters & Comments COVER 50 Air Commandos Support 33 Education in Honduras CONGRESS to THE 55 RESCUE Medal of Honor Recipient A1C William H. Pitsenbarger www.aircommando.org Spring 2012 │ AIR COMMANDO JOURNAL │ 3 FOREWORD As we Air Commandos reflect on the early exploits of the 13 initiatives was presented Johnny Alison and Heinie Aderholt, we are reminded of to SECDEF which, if supported, the challenge each of them had to overcome to integrate a provided the resources required force many did not understand nor appreciate. When the to fulfill the new role of the Vietnam era came to an end, we still faced an uncertain Command. During General future with conventional wisdom not understanding Welch’s assessment of MFP-11, the relevance of special operations forces (SOF).
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL GUARD and RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT (NGRER) Department of Defense
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT (NGRER) REPORT EQUIPMENT AND RESERVE GUARD NATIONAL Department of Defense National Guard and Reserve Office of the Under Secretary of Defense FY 2019 Readiness (Personnel and Readiness) Equipment Report for 4000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-4000 Fiscal Year 2019 March 2018 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 (NGRER FY 2019) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2018 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $598,000 in Fiscal Years 2017 - 2018. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $386,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2018Feb07 RefID: 6-DBCAE71 An electronic version of this report can be found at: http://prhome.defense.gov/Readiness/Publications/ Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Introduction 1-1 II. Operational Reserve Component Equipping Process and Associated Challenges 1-2 III. Scope of the Report 1-7 IV. Equipment Shortages 1-8 V. Equipment Procurement 1-9 VI. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-12 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-12 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-13 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-14 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-15 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-15 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-16 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-17 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I.
    [Show full text]
  • Zaglada2013 Ang 03STUDIES 1 Barabasz.Indd
    Studies Alina Skibińska, Joanna Tokarska-Bakir “Barabasz” and the Jews: From the history of the “Wybraniecki” Home Army Partisan Detachment In January 1990 Zvi Zelinger (Israeli citizen, domiciled in Kielce until 1939) sent a letter to the Righteous among the Nations Yad Vashem department in Je- rusalem, in which he described the circumstances in which his 12-year-old sister Dina (Danusia) and aunt Zoia had died in 1944. The two women were hiding in the village of Zagórze near Daleszyce together with a few other Jews from Kielce. A Pole, Stefan Sawa – Zoia Zelinger’s friend from before the war – was helping them. Zelinger learnt about the circumstances of their death only in 1989, when he inally managed to come to Poland and talk to the living witnesses of the trag- edy in Zagórze. A fragment of his letter to Yad Vashem: At the beginning of February 1944 Stefan Sawa came to them [his family in Kielce – A.S., J.T.-B.] to their house and told them that the Home Army [Armia Krajowa, AK] underground partisans had searched the house and found the Jews. The underground members warned him that he had to rid his house of the Jews in two weeks’ time. When he asked why they were threatening him, they said that if the Germans came and found them, they would destroy the whole village and that they wanted to avoid that. According to the sister-in-law, the following were his last words: If they come again, we will bribe them with money and ask for mercy and a little more time, for then it was obvious that the war was about to end soon and that the Russians would arrive in a few days and he hoped to buy some time.
    [Show full text]
  • Piece of Machinery, but Only Had an Operating Radius of 60 Miles
    Front Cover: A US Air Force KC-135R Stratotanker aircraft sets on the runway at Niagra Falls Air Reserve Station, New York, on 4 October 2006. The aircraft was assigned to the 107th Air Refueling Wing. (US Air Force photo by SMSgt Ray Lloyd) AIR REFUELING: Without Tankers, We Cannot… Contributing Authors: Ellery D. Wallwork Mark L. Morgan Lillian E. Nolan Daniel R. Simmons Jeffrey S. Michalke John W. Leland With: Kathryn A. Wilcoxson Office of History Air Mobility Command Scott Air Force Base, Illinois October 2009 A 10,000-pound Fokker C-2 is refueled in flight by a modified Douglas C-1 transport aircraft during an operation dubbed “Question Mark” in 1929. ii FOREWORD TANKERS: FROM A QUESTION MARK TO TODAY’S FIGHT General Arthur J. Lichte December 2008 Air refueling operations continue to be amazing aerial feats, especially for people who witness the process for the first time. As mobility Airmen, we consider it simply part of what we do but, in reality, it is quite remarkable to have two aircraft meeting less than 50 feet apart at more than 20,000 feet above the ground traveling at speeds close to 400 miles per hour while a tanker replenishes another aircraft with the fuel necessary to continue the mission. The amazement is even greater when one considers the first major air refueling operation happened 80 years ago when the Question Mark, a tri-engined Fokker C-2 aircraft with a crew of five, climbed into the southern California sky January 1, 1929. Over the next seven days, the crew kept the aircraft airborne through air refueling from two, three-manned crews operating Douglas C-1 single-engine transports that had been transformed into tankers with the addition of two 150-gallon tanks to off- load fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    National Aeronautic Association FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Nicole Regele, 703-527-0226 March 25, 2004 [email protected] Air Force unit “Vijay 10” wins 2003 Mackay Trophy Five crewmembers given prestigious award for duty in Iraqi war Arlington, VA – The National Aeronautic Association and the United States Air Force awarded the unit known by the call sign “Vijay 10” with the Clarence Mackay Trophy for 2003 for its heroic service in the U.S. efforts in the war in Iraq. The five-member crew planned and led a key portion of Operation Northern Delay in Iraq, the main supporting action for Operation Iraqi Freedom. On March 26, 2003, the first night of the coalition ground campaign in Northern Iraq, the crew directed the combat insertion of the 173rd Airborne Brigade with a 15-ship formation of C-17A Globemaster IIIs, a strategic transport plane. The initial airdrop occurred over Bashur, Iraq, and constituted the largest formation airdrop since D- Day in World War II. The Air Force termed the mission the most demanding C-17A mission in the aircraft’s history, and it marked the first time personnel were dropped from the C-17A in combat. After the initial insertion, Vijay 10 crew members, along with active and Reserve crews from Charleston Air Force Base, S.C., and McChord Air Force Base, Wash., conducted four more nights of missions to deploy the rest of the 173rd and the Combat Readiness Group. Vijay 10’s mission effectively established the United States’ second military front in Iraq. The award is presented annually for the most meritorious flight of the year and for gallantry, intrepidity, unusual initiative and resourcefulness, achievement of outstanding results with unusual presence of mind in either combat or non-combat conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR COMMANDO JOURNAL Vol 7, Issue 3
    Corporate ACA Partners Assisting ACA in our mission to support Air Commandos and their families: Past, Present, and Future PLATINUM ARMA Geico Northrop Grumman Bell Helicopter Intellisense Systems, Inc. Principal Deloitte Consulting, LLP Boeing L3T Special Programs Ultra Electronics ICE CACI Lockheed Martin Vertex Aerospace Elbit Systems of America GOLD Arby’s Leonardo DRS Sierra Nevada Group The Hoplite Group VATC SILVER CAE USA First Command Financial Services Rally Point Management Creative Awards & Framing ITA International, Inc. SoCoSIX Strategies E Science & Tech Solutions MacAulay-Brown, Inc. VectorCSP BRONZE Beam, McLaughlin & Associates GE Aviation Quantitech, Inc. Booz Allen Hamilton General Atomics Aeronautical Rolls-Royce North America Collins Aerospace Knight Vision Strategic, LLC SPIRIT Blue Water Escape Emerald Coast Convention Center Southeastern Landscaping Eglin Federal Credit Union Esterline Defense Technologies 2 │ AIR COMMANDO JOURNAL │Vol 7, Issue 3 www.aircommando.org Air Commando Journal March 2019 Vol. 7, Issue 3 5 Foreword: Wayne Norrad, CMSgt, USAF (Ret) 9 John Chapman, His Life 14 2018 Air Commando Hall of Fame 20 John Chapman’s Induction into the 2018 Air 28 Commando Hall of Fame 2018 Commander’s Leadership Awards 6 39 Chindit Chatter 3rd SOS USAF’s Inaugural 7 RPA Squadron of the Year Hotwash 22 43 2018 ACA Convention Photos Project 9 and Operation THURSDAY: 75th Anniversary 34 Air Commandos: A Proud of the Air Commandos History - ACA Memorial Speech 37 47 MacKay Trophy Awarded to “Carpetbaggers” Recognized AC-130U Crew Spooky 43 by a Grateful Norway 41 USAF Outstanding Airman of 49 the Year: TSgt Brett Laswell Brothers in Book Review: 42 Berets: The Evolution of Air Force P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Airdrop Be Utilized As a Means of Promoting Zero-Footprint Logistics for The
    Can airdrop be utilized as a means of promoting zero-footprint logistics for the resupply of the Canadian Forces? by Stephen Wright A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE I.H. Asper School of Business Department of Supply Chain Management University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Copyright © 2013 by Stephen Wright! ! I! Abstract This thesis examines the suitability of airdrop as a means of resupply for the Canadian Forces (CF) in an attempt to reduce forward supply inventories and promote “zero- footprint” logistics. Research methods involved both quantitative and qualitative techniques, consulting CF manuals and subject matter experts. Based on performance, airdrop staged from rear locations or outside the theatre of operations can meet resupply requirements. Although airdrop has longer assembly and loading times than ground based delivery, flight speed and direct routes can make up the difference. However based on interviews with CF personnel, it appears that due to limited availability of aircraft, drop zone requirements, delivery vehicle vulnerability, and the need for backhaul logistics, airdrop could not be used as a sole means of resupply. ! II! Acknowledgments ! I would like to extend my appreciation to several individuals and organizations that were instrumental in the development of this thesis. The Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces provided me with a wide assortment of information and personnel to consult with. In particular, I wish to thank the staff of the Canadian Forces Aerospace Warfare Centre who suggested the topic of “Zero Footprint” logistics for my thesis and LCol.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-17, Air Mobility Operations, 5 February 2019
    Joint Publication 3-17 OF TH NT E E A W E' L L D R I S E F E N M H D T M T Y R • A P E A C D I U • R N E I T M E A D F S O TAT E S Air Mobility Operations 5 February 2019 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides fundamental principles and guidance for planning, employing, and assessing air mobility operations across the range of military operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Army Airborne Forces
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Enhanced Army Airborne Forces A New Joint Operational Capability John Gordon IV, Agnes Gereben Schaefer, David A.
    [Show full text]