DOCSLIB.ORG

JP 3-17, Air Mobility Operations, 5 February 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JP 3-17, Air Mobility Operations, 5 February 2019 Joint Publication 3-17 OF TH NT E E A W E' L L D R I S E F E N M H D T M T Y R • A P E A C D I U • R N E I T M E A D F S O TAT E S Air Mobility Operations 5 February 2019 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides fundamental principles and guidance for planning, employing, and assessing air mobility operations across the range of military operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. This doctrine constitutes official advice concerning the enclosed subject matter; however, the judgment of the commander is paramount in all situations. c. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the CJCS, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance. Commanders of forces operating as part of a multinational (alliance or coalition) military command should follow multinational doctrine and procedures ratified by the United States. For doctrine and procedures not ratified by the United States, commanders should evaluate and follow the multinational command’s doctrine and procedures, where applicable and consistent with US law, regulations, and doctrine. For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: DANIEL J. O’DONOHUE Lieutenant General, USMC Director, Joint Force Development i Preface Intentionally Blank ii JP 3-17 SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-17 DATED 20 SEPTEMBER 2013 • Updates relationships and roles. • Updates for consistency with other joint publications (JPs). • Adds description of air mobility liaison officers. • Updates information on joint deployment and distribution operations center, joint task forces, host-nation support, mobility air forces cost avoidance tankering, public affairs, and Army aviation. • Adds descriptions of United States Navy and United States Marine Corps reserve airlift. • Clarifies and reorganizes mission funding categories. • Clarifies role of the director of mobility forces. • Removes tactical details of airdrop and arrivals. • Reorganizes order of chapters and updates chapter on Air Mobility Support. • Updates aeromedical evacuation section and removes redundancy with JP 4- 02, Joint Health Services. • Updates description of channel airlift missions to distinguish between distribution and contingency channels, as well as role of United States Transportation Command. • Updates mobility support to special operations. iii Summary of Changes Intentionally Blank iv JP 3-17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I GENERAL OVERVIEW Introduction ................................................................................................................. I-1 Deployment ................................................................................................................. I-1 Air Mobility Forces Employment Missions ............................................................... I-2 Movement and Maneuver ........................................................................................... I-2 Sustainment ................................................................................................................. I-3 Air Mobility Fundamentals ......................................................................................... I-3 Global Mobility Enterprise ......................................................................................... I-8 CHAPTER II COMMAND AND CONTROL OF AIR MOBILITY OPERATIONS General .......................................................................................................................II-1 Command Relationships ............................................................................................II-1 Command and Control ...............................................................................................II-2 Command and Control Structures ..............................................................................II-4 Command and Control of Airfields During Contingency Operations .....................II-12 CHAPTER III PLANNING AIR MOBILITY OPERATIONS Air Mobility Planning Considerations ..................................................................... III-1 Marshalling .............................................................................................................. III-2 Intelligence ............................................................................................................... III-8 Vulnerabilities and Threats ...................................................................................... III-8 Communications Systems ...................................................................................... III-11 Sustainment ............................................................................................................ III-13 Assessment ............................................................................................................. III-14 Multinational Planning Considerations .................................................................. III-15 Other Planning Factors .......................................................................................... III-16 CHAPTER IV AIR MOBILITY SUPPORT General ..................................................................................................................... IV-1 Air Mobility Support................................................................................................ IV-1 Capabilities of Air Mobility Support ....................................................................... IV-5 Global Air Mobility Support System Elements ....................................................... IV-7 Airfield Opening and Global Air Mobility Support System .................................. IV-11 v Table of Contents CHAPTER V AIRLIFT General ...................................................................................................................... V-1 Airlift Operations ...................................................................................................... V-1 Airlift Missions ......................................................................................................... V-2 Airland Delivery ..................................................................................................... V-11 Airdrop .................................................................................................................... V-17 Planning Considerations for Airborne Assaults and Follow-on Airland Operations ................................................................. V-23 CHAPTER VI AIR REFUELING General ..................................................................................................................... VI-1 Air Refueling Operations ......................................................................................... VI-2 Air Refueling Missions ............................................................................................ VI-4 Planning Air Refueling Operations .......................................................................... VI-8 APPENDIX A Points of Contact ....................................................................................... A-1 B References ..................................................................................................B-1 C Administrative Instructions ........................................................................C-1 GLOSSARY Part I Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms .............................................. GL-1 Part II Terms and Definitions ............................................................................. GL-6 FIGURE II-1 Mobility Air Forces Command and Control ..............................................II-5 II-2 The Joint Air Operations Center and Command Relationships for Air Mobility Forces ..............................................................................II-7 III-1 Factors Affecting Selection of Marshalling Areas and Departure Airfields ............................................................................ III-3 III-2 Departure Airfield Operations .................................................................. III-5 III-3 Arrival
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theater Airlift Modernization Options for Closing the Gap
    Halvorsen loader pulls away from C-130J Super Hercules at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, where Airmen from aerial port and airlift squadrons support operations 24/7 at DOD’s busiest single runway airfield (U.S. Air Force/Brian Wagner) Theater Airlift Modernization Options for Closing the Gap By Robert C. Owen merica’s renewed strategic the Nation has and what it expects to whether the POR airlift fleet will be ade- emphasis on state-on-state con- acquire) presents serious shortfalls in quate to the demands likely to be placed A flict highlights significant gaps the ability to maneuver land forces on on it. The discussion then turns to the in the country’s theater airlift capa- the scale, to the destinations, or in the question of whether affordable opportu- bilities, particularly in the Asia-Pacific timeframes desired by Army planners. nities exist to mitigate the gaps identified. region. Quantitatively, there likely will Air commanders also have reason for not be enough airlift capacity available concern since the core aircraft of the Requirements to cover major conflict requirements. theater fleet, the C-17 and C-130, pose Many organizations articulate versions Qualitatively, the current program- capacity and operational risks in their of airlift requirements based on sub- of-record (POR) airlift fleet (what abilities to support high-volume combat jective guesses about future scenarios. operations at forward bases when Moreover, the details of the more threatened or damaged by attack. authoritative Department of Defense Given these gaps between capabilities (DOD) studies are classified. Therefore, Dr. Robert C. Owen is a Professor in the Department of Aeronautical Science at Embry- and requirements, this article considers this article asserts only that the steady Riddle Aeronautical University.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Publication Until Released by the House Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL LUKE M. McCOLLUM, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVY RESERVE BEFORE THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2021 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE March 3, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 NAVY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................................... 5 Commander, Navy Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) ........................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Air Forces Reserve (CNAFR) ...................................................................................... 5 Commander, Naval Information Force Reserve (CNIFR) .......................................................................... 6 Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) ........................................................................................ 7 PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Civilian Skills .............................................................................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Rules for Nuclear Logistics Transport by the Prime Nuclear Airlift Force
    BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 91-115 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 1 AUGUST 1998 Safety SAFETY RULES FOR NUCLEAR LOGISTICS TRANSPORT BY THE PRIME NUCLEAR AIRLIFT FORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY NOTICE: This publication is available digitally on the SAF/AAD WWW site at: http://afpubs.hq.af.mil. If you lack access, contact your Publishing Distribution Office (PDO). OPR: HQ AFSC/SEWO Certified by: HQ USAF/SE (Lt Col Ronald E. Morin) (Maj Gen Francis C. Gideon, Jr.) Supersedes AFI 91-115, 1 October 1997. Pages: 7 Distribution: F This instruction implements AFPD 91-1, Nuclear Weapon Systems Surety and Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 3150.2, Nuclear Weapon System Safety Program, December 23, 1996. It applies to Prime Nuclear Airlift Force (PNAF) operations with C-141B, C-17A, and C-130E/E*/H aircraft trans- porting nuclear weapons. Section A assigns responsibilities. Section B contains the nuclear weapon sys- tem safety rules for PNAF operations. The safety rules in Section B may only be changed or supplemented using procedures in AFI 91-102, Nuclear Weapon System Safety Studies, Operational Safety Reviews, and Safety Rules. Paragraph 11.2. applies to the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard. SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This revision adds the C-17A to the Nuclear Logistics Transport by the Prime Nuclear Airlift Force. A bar (|) indicates revisions from the previous edition. Section A—Authority and Responsibilities 1. Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) Direction. The JCS directs the Chief of Staff, US Air Force, to imple- ment the safety rules.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, As a Basis for Conducting CAS
    Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support 08 July 2009 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning and executing close air support. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) ATQ Summer 2004
    CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments......................................................................... 2 President’s Message ............................................................................... 3 AIRLIFT TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 12 • Number 3 • Summer 2004 Secretary’s Notes ................................................................................... 3 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, Col. Barry F. Creighton, USAF (Ret.), Secretary, Association Round-Up .......................................................................... 4 1708 Cavelletti Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23454. (757) 838-3037. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $30.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. Cover Story The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the AMC: 12 Years of Excellence ......................................................... 6-17 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $30 annually A New Era in American Air Power Began on 1 June 1992 or $85 for three years. Full-time student membership is $10 per year. Life membership is $400. Corporate membership includes five individual memberships and is $1200 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Departments Airlift/Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published for the use of the officers,
    [Show full text]
  • Major Christopher M. Edmondson
    U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E MAJOR CHRISTOPHER M. EDMONDSON Major Edmondson is the Recruiting Flight Commander at the University of Memphis, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps, Detachment 785. Major Edmondson is a professor of Aerospace Studies for the University and is primarily responsible for recruiting new cadets, and educating and commissioning the current Flying Tigers. Prior to his current assignment, he served as the Chief of Group Weapons and Tactics, 655 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Group (ISRG), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. As Weapons and Tactics Chief, he was responsible for coordinating tactics training and improvement efforts for 11 AFRC Intelligence Squadrons engaged in emerginghighly technical, diverse and complicated ISR mission sets. Prior to coming to the 655 ISRG, Major Edmondson served as Senior Intelligence Duty Officer at the 618 AOC (Tanker Airlift Control Center). He has also served as Individual Mobilization Augmentee, Flight Commander, 19 Operations Group Intelligence. Major Edmondson received his commission through the University of Mississippi, Oxford, Air Force ROTC program in 2002. He joined the Air Force Reserve in 2006 after serving as Deputy Flight Commander, 463 OSS Intelligence Flight. EDUCATION 1999 Bachelor of Arts in History, Williams Baptist College, Walnut Ridge, Arkansas 1999 Bachelor of Arts in Theology, Williams Baptist College, Walnut Ridge, Arkansas 2004 USAF Intelligence Officer Course, Goodfellow AFB, Texas 2004 C-130 Intelligence Formal Training
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mobility Forum
    MOBILITYTHE MAGAZINE OF AIR MOBILITYFORUM COMMAND | SPRING 2020 Agile, Prepared, Responsive: Readiness as an Asymmetric Advantage 2019 SAFETY AWARD WINNERS Pages 20-29 With Dedicated Airmen, Team McConnell Conquers Challenges THE Volume 29, No. 1 MOBILITY Spring 2020 FORUM CONTENTS AIR MOBILITY COMMAND Gen Maryanne Miller DIRECTOR OF SAFETY Col Brandon R. Hileman [email protected] EDITORS Kim Knight [email protected] Sherrie Schatz 5 21 32 34 Sheree Lewis [email protected] FROM THE TOP SEASONAL 36 515th Air Mobility GRAPHIC DESIGN Operations Wing Elizabeth Bailey 3 Agile, Prepared, CONSIDERATIONS Operation Christmas Responsive: Readiness 15 Gone in a Flash: Flash Drop 2019 The Mobility Forum (TMF) is published as an Asymmetric Floods Can Endanger four times a year by the Director of Advantage You and Your Property at Safety, Air Mobility Command, Scott a Moment’s Notice AMC HERITAGE AFB, IL. The contents are informative and 5 Brig Gen Charles Bolton, not regulatory or directive. Viewpoints Vice Commander of 32 Airlift’s First Female expressed are those of the authors and the 18th Air Force, Talks AMC NEWS Aircraft Maintenance do not necessarily reflect the policy Officer, Pilot, and of AMC, USAF, or any DoD agency. Readiness Advocacy 18 Prince Sultan Air Base Aerial Port Squadron 7 Cybersecurity at the Reopened by the 621st Contributions: Please email articles and Commander photos to [email protected], 375th Air Mobility Wing, Contingency Response fax to (580) 628-2011, or mail to Scott Air Force Base, IL Support Squadron REGULAR FEATURES Schatz Publishing, 11950 W. Highland 20 AMC’s Annual 2019 Ave., Blackwell, OK 74631.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of the Tri-Service Maritime Strategy for America's
    IMPLICATIONS OF THE TRI-SERVICE MARITIME STRATEGY FOR AMERICA’S NAVAL SERVICES MICHAEL SINCLAIR, RODRICK H. MCHATY, AND BLAKE HERZINGER MARCH 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 17, 2020 the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard (naval services) issued a new Tri-Service Maritime Strategy (TSMS).1 Entitled “Advantage at Sea,”2 the TSMS represents a significant update to modern U.S. maritime defense and security thinking, in large part, in recognition of the growing effect strategic competition, specifically with respect to China, will play in the coming years. The TSMS identifies three phases — day-to-day competition, conflict, and crisis — and calls for greater integration amongst the naval services to prevail across every phase.3 With respect to the Coast Guard, it includes specific recognition of the service’s unique authorities and capabilities as an important aspect of the defense enterprise, critical in the day-to-day competition phase to avoid further escalation into conflict and crisis. But important enterprise, departmental, and congressional considerations remain for the Coast Guard, especially regarding ensuring the close integration the TSMS calls for. For the Marine Corps, the intent is to demonstrate credible deterrence in the western Pacific by distributing lethal, survivable, and sustainable expeditionary sea-denial anti-ship units in the littorals in support of fleet and joint operations. And finally, the Navy finds itself as the ship-to- shore connector for the TSMS, with responsibility for knitting together the three naval services in new operating concepts and frameworks for cooperation while simultaneously confronting critical external threats and looming internal challenges.
    [Show full text]