National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC. Unless the RC continues to be considered an indispensable part of the Total Force and resourced appropriately, equipment levels are likely to wane with potentially dire consequences. Since 1982, Congress has funded the National Guard and Reserve Equipment Appropriation (NGREA) for procurement of aircraft, missiles, tracked combat vehicles, ammunition, weapons, and other procurement for the RC. We are extremely grateful to Congress for this supplement, but the Department needs to be cautious that the supplement does not become the primary means of equipping the RC. We will continue to emphasize increased communication with Congress to garner a common understanding concerning RC equipment on-hand and modernization levels. Going forward, we will continue to strive to find an appropriate balance between the AC and a well-equipped and well-trained RC ready to assume full mission responsibility when called. Sincerely, Richard O. Wightman, Jr. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Strategic Context 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-1 III. Equipment Shortages 1-2 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-3 V. The Reserve Components’ Equipping Concerns 1-4 A. The Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-4 B. The Army Reserve (AR) 1-5 C. The United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-6 D. The United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-7 E. The Air National Guard (ANG) 1-7 F. The Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-8 G. The United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-8 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Policy 2-1 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-4 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 2-8 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-9 A. Current Status of the Army National Guard 2-9 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 2-15 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 2-16 D. Summary 2-23 Table 1: ARNG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ARNG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ARNG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ARNG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ARNG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ARNG FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ARNG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ARNG Significant Major Item Shortages III. United States Army Reserve Overview 2-24 A. Current Status of the Army Reserve 2-24 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 2-28 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 2-30 D. Summary 2-35 i Table 1: USAR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USAR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USAR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USAR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USAR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USAR FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USAR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USAR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 3 United States Marine Corps Reserve I. Marine Corps Overview 3-1 A. Marine Corps Planning Guidance 3-2 B. Marine Corps Equipping Policy 3-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 3-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 3-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 3-3 II. Marine Corps Reserve Overview 3-4 A. Current Status of the Marine Corps Reserve 3-4 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 3-7 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 3-7 D. Summary 3-10 Table 1: USMCR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USMCR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USMCR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USMCR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USMCR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USMCR FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USMCR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USMCR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 4 United States Navy Reserve I. Navy Overview 4-1 A. Navy Planning Guidance 4-1 B. Navy Equipping Policy 4-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 4-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 4-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 4-5 II. Navy Reserve Overview 4-6 A. Current Status of the Navy Reserve 4-6 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 4-15 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 4-15 D. Summary 4-15 ii Table 1: USNR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USNR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USNR Service Procurement Program Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USNR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USNR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USNR FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USNR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USNR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 5 United States Air Reserve Components I. United States Air Force Overview 5-1 A. Air Force Planning Guidance 5-1 B. Air Force Equipping Policy 5-1 C. Plan to Fill Modernization Shortages in the RC 5-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 5-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 5-3 II. Air National Guard Overview 5-5 A. Current Status of the Air National Guard 5-5 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-5 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 5-7 D. Summary 5-17 Table 1: ANG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ANG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ANG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ANG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ANG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ANG FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ANG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ANG Significant Major Item Shortages III. Air Force Reserve Overview 5-18 A. Current Status of the Air Force Reserve 5-18 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-26 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 5-27 D. Summary 5-28 Table 1: AFR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: AFR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: AFR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: AFR NGREA Procurements Table 5: AFR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: AFR FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: AFR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: AFR Significant Major Item Shortages iii Chapter 6 United States Coast Guard Reserve I. Coast Guard Overview 6-1 A. Coast Guard Planning Guidance 6-3 B. Coast Guard Equipping Policy 6-3 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 6-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 6-4 II. Coast Guard Reserve Overview 6-5 A. Current Status of the Coast Guard Reserve 6-5 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 6-8 C. Future Years Program (FY 2015–FY 2017) 6-8 D. Summary 6-10 Table 1: USCGR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USCGR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USCGR Service Procurement Program- Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USCGR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USCGR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USCGR FY 2011 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USCGR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USCGR Significant Major Item Shortages Appendix A: Report Requirements, Terminology, and Definitions Appendix B: National Guard Readiness for Emergencies and Major Disasters Appendix C: Points of Contact Appendix D: Acronym Glossary iv Chapter 1 Overview I. Strategic Context A mission-ready Reserve Component (RC) is critical to our National Security Strategy. To maintain mission readiness in today’s fiscal environment, a Total Force policy supporting employment of the RC in both operational and strategic roles is essential for ensuring a relevant well-equipped and well-trained RC.
Recommended publications
  • Air Force at the Alamo
    A PUBLICATION OF THE 502nd AIR BASE WING JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, TEXAS • Vol. 70 No. 16 • April 26, 2013 Marching in step Commentary Milestone Sports The reality of sequestration SAPR o ers information and support FSS stays undefeated Page 2 Page 3 Page 19 Photo by Carlos Ramirez Staff Sgt. Katrevious Swift leads 322nd Training Squadron Flight 287 past the grandstands during Air Force Basic Military Training graduation at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland April 18. Swift was the fl ight’s military training instructor team chief. Story Pages 10 &15. INSIDE | Commentary 2 News 3 Community Briefs 17 What’s Happening 18 Sports 19 & 20 ONLINE | http://www.jbsa.af.mil PAGE 2 commentary TALESPINNER April 26, 2013 Joint Base San Antonio Lackland If it isn’t you, it’s the person next to you Editorial Staff BRIG . GEN . THERESA C. CAR T ER , By Senior Airman Kelly Galloway seats to get away from him. This was why I was being called into the JBSA/502ND AIR Bas E WING , 439th Airlift Wing Public Affairs Westover Air Reserve Base, Mass. With my new location in the classroom, room. The other girl was witness to what COMM A NDER I felt a bit more at ease. Although the Air- happened and they both wanted to open an TODD G. WHI T E , “Hey sexy ... you single?” man now had one of his male friends start investigation after speaking with the sexual JBSA/502ND AIR Bas E WING I turned to see a fellow Airman in to jeer me because I had gotten him in assault response coordinator on base.
    [Show full text]
  • Westover Air Reserve Base/ Metropolitan Airport Noise Exposure Map (NEM) & Noise Compatibility Plan (NCP) Update
    Westover Air Reserve Base/ Metropolitan Airport Noise Exposure Map (NEM) & Noise Compatibility Plan (NCP) Update This document provides an update to the 2014 NEM and 2014 NCP. June 1, 2018 Prepared for: Westover Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services and HNTB Corporation Westover Air Reserve Base / Metropolitan Airport NEM/NCP Update Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 14 CFR Part 150 .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Noise Exposure Maps .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Noise Compatibility Program ........................................................................................ 2 1.4 Project Roles and Responsibilities .............................................................................. 2 Westover Metropolitan Development Corporation ................................................. 3 439th Airlift Wing of the Air Force Reserve ............................................................ 3 Pioneer Valley Planning Commission ................................................................... 3 Massachusetts Department of Transportation - Aeronautics Division .................... 3 Consultant ............................................................................................................ 3 Federal Aviation
    [Show full text]
  • Dcn 1631 Department of the Air Force Air Force Reserve
    DCN 1631 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE RESERVE May 29, 1995 910 AWICC 3976 King Graves Road Young stown-Warren Regional Airport Air Reserve Station, Ohio 44473-09 10 Base Realignment and Closure Commission 1700 North Moore Street, Suite 1425 Arlington VA 22208 Dear Commissioners On behalf of the 910 Airlift Wing, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to demonstrate how we at Youngstown have effectively utilized the scarce resources with which we have been entrusted over the years. With the expert help of the Ohio Edison Company, we have prepared this binder and video to show the 910 Airlift Wing as a vital part of the Air Force Reserve, for today and for the future. The 910 Airlift Wing has a rich tradition of "going the extra mile" to get the job done. Through our community involvement program, we have developed a reputation as good, responsible citizens. The awards and accolades this unit has received and its esprit de corps is a testimony to the dedication, hard work and professionalism of its people. We have tried to capture in this book the responsibility and vision with which we have pursued our goals over the years. We hope these illustrations we have prepared are clear and concise so as to assist the commission in resolving a difficult situation in a fair and equitable manner. If you need any additional information, we will be happy to provide it. Sincerely, BERNARD J. PIECZYNSKI, Colonel, US AFR Commander BRAC REVIEW GUIDE - 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter from the Commander I SECTION I - Youngstown Air Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve
    December 2018 Volume 70 No. 6 QUIET PROFESSIONALS AN EXCLUSIVE LOOK INSIDE THE RESERVE’S ONLY SPECIAL OPERATIONS WING Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top Chief’s View @ AFRCCommander @ AFRC.CCC @ AFRC_CCC BUILDING ON A SOLID FOUNDATION GET OUT OF YOUR COMFORT ZONE AND EMBRACE CHANGE Heroes of the Air Force Reserve: Our success as an Insurance during I welcome change with a vision of understanding that organization and our achievements as individuals depend deployments, and change will bring a positive transformation in the way on having a solid foundation. A solid foundation provides continued convert- we define leadership. Socrates once said, “The secret of a basis for us to continue building, the flexibility to adjust ing many positions change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the to changing conditions, and as Hurricanes Florence and from Air Reserve old, but on building the new.” Michael recently taught us, the faith that we can survive Technician to Active There are some of us who have been hurt, taken ad- and rebuild after even the worst of storms. Guard and Reserve vantage of or just mistreated by a supervisor, a friend or As the chief of the Air Force Reserve, an important part status. a family member. To those individuals, I say…I’ve been of my job is to ensure we have a solid foundation. This This past summer, there. Sometimes we don’t know if change is your friend requires setting and aligning our strategic objectives with we removed restric- or not.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2007 Unfunded Priority List (UPL)
    FY 2007 Unfunded Priority List (UPL) Feb 2006 SAF/FMB POC Budget and Appropriations Liaison Office (703) 614-8110 FY 2007 UNFUNDED PRIORITY LIST INDEX FY2007 UNFUNDED PRIORITY LIST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................. 4 NARRATIVES FOR TOP 16 PRIORITIES 1. National Defense Airlift Fund Capability Upgrades................................................ 10 2. AFSOC Predator.................................................................................................... 13 3. A-10 Modifications ................................................................................................. 16 4. Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) ............................................. 21 5. Armored Security Vehicles .................................................................................... 34 6. M-4 Carbine........................................................................................................... 37 7. SNIPER Pod Procurement and Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) Research .......... 41 8. Guardian Angel Combat Equipment ...................................................................... 45 9. ICBM Security Modernization ................................................................................ 49 10. Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) - Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)......................... 53 11. AF Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Emergency Response ........................ 56 12. B-1/B-52 Deployable Phase Maintenance Kits ...................................................... 61 13. B-2 Satellite
    [Show full text]
  • AFDD 2-8 Command and Control
    Cover Sheet for Air Force Doctrine Document (AFDD) 6-0, Command and Control OPR: LeMay Center/DD 28 July 2011 AFDD numbering has changed to correspond with the joint doctrine publication numbering architecture (the AFDD titles remain unchanged until the doctrine is revised). Any AFDD citations within the documents will list the old AFDD numbers until the doctrine is revised. The changed numbers follow: OLD NEW TITLE AFDD 2-1 changed to AFDD 3-1 Air Warfare AFDD 2-1.1 changed to AFDD 3-01 Counterair Operations AFDD 2-1.2 changed to AFDD 3-70 Strategic Attack AFDD 2-1.3 changed to AFDD 3-03 Counterland Operations AFDD 2-1.4 changed to AFDD 3-04 Countersea Operations AFDD 2-1.6 changed to AFDD 3-50 Personnel Recovery Operations AFDD 2-1.7 changed to AFDD 3-52 Airspace Control AFDD 2-1.8 changed to AFDD 3-40 Counter-CBRN AFDD 2-1.9 changed to AFDD 3-60 Targeting AFDD 2-10 changed to AFDD 3-27 Homeland Operations AFDD 2-12 changed to AFDD 3-72 Nuclear Operations AFDD 2-2 changed to AFDD 3-14 Space Operations AFDD 2-2.1 changed to AFDD 3-14.1 Counterspace Operations AFDD 2-3 changed to AFDD 3-24 Irregular Warfare AFDD 2-3.1 changed to AFDD 3-22 Foreign Internal Defense AFDD 2-4 changed to AFDD 4-0 Combat Support AFDD 2-4.1 changed to AFDD 3-10 Force Protection AFDD 2-4.2 changed to AFDD 4-02 Health Services AFDD 2-4.4 changed to AFDD 4-11 Bases, Infrastructure, and Facilities [Rescinded] AFDD 2-4.5 changed to AFDD 1-04 Legal Support AFDD 2-5 changed to AFDD 3-13 Information Operations AFDD 2-5.1 changed to AFDD 3-13.1 Electronic Warfare AFDD
    [Show full text]
  • Almanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide
    USAFAlmanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide Major Installations Note: A major installation is an Air Force Base, Air Andrews AFB, Md. 20762-5000; 10 mi. SE of 4190th Wing, Pisa, Italy; 31st Munitions Support Base, Air Guard Base, or Air Reserve Base that Washington, D. C. Phone (301) 981-1110; DSN Sqdn., Ghedi AB, Italy; 4190th Air Base Sqdn. serves as a self-supporting center for Air Force 858-1110. AMC base. Gateway to the nation’s (Provisional), San Vito dei Normanni, Italy; 496th combat, combat support, or training operations. capital and home of Air Force One. Host wing: 89th Air Base Sqdn., Morón AB, Spain; 731st Munitions Active-duty, Air National Guard (ANG), or Air Force Airlift Wing. Responsible for Presidential support Support Sqdn., Araxos AB, Greece; 603d Air Control Reserve Command (AFRC) units of wing size or and base operations; supports all branches of the Sqdn., Jacotenente, Italy; 48th Intelligence Sqdn., larger operate the installation with all land, facili- armed services, several major commands, and Rimini, Italy. One of the oldest Italian air bases, ties, and support needed to accomplish the unit federal agencies. The wing also hosts Det. 302, dating to 1911. USAF began operations in 1954. mission. There must be real property accountability AFOSI; Hq. Air Force Flight Standards Agency; Area 1,467 acres. Runway 8,596 ft. Altitude 413 through ownership of all real estate and facilities. AFOSI Academy; Air National Guard Readiness ft. Military 3,367; civilians 1,102. Payroll $156.9 Agreements with foreign governments that give Center; 113th Wing (D. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Operations in a Contested Environment
    C O R P O R A T I O N Distributed Operations in a Contested Environment Implications for USAF Force Presentation Miranda Priebe, Alan J. Vick, Jacob L. Heim, Meagan L. Smith For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2959 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0232-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Because of increasing air and missile threats to air bases, the Air Force is developing concepts to operate from a large number of small operating locations in a conflict with a near- peer competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 (NGRER FY 2018) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2017 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $896,000 in Fiscal Years 2016–2017. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $684,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017Feb15 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges (Operational & Strategic Reserve Forces) 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-7 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-8 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-11 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Army Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-3 F. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 G. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-6 A.
    [Show full text]
  • West Gate on Schedule Photo by Steve Brady Entrance Will Re-Open in November, Relieve Load on North and East Gates
    COMMANDER’S CORNER: KEY WING EVENTS SUMMARY – PAGE 3 Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Thursday, September 20, 2007 Vol. 51 No. 25 West Gate on schedule Photo by Steve Brady Entrance will re-open in November, relieve load on North and East gates By Corey Dahl move it over to the right lane, and then the Space Observer gate was down to one lane coming onto Sitting in traffic at the North and East base,” Mr. Williams said. “We’re not going to gates might seem frustrating now, but, in a have that problem anymore. It’s going to be couple of months, it will all be a distant so much better.” memory. The new gatehouse will feature an over- Contractors are working six days a week hanging cover to protect gate guards and putting the finishing touches on the $12.7 anyone performing augmentee duty from million West Gate renovation project, which the weather. is nearly 80 percent complete. Barring any And the new visitor’s center, which will fall snowstorms, the gate is on track to re- more than double in size, will help open Nov. 4, said Roger Williams, military streamline the process for getting guests construction inspector with the 21st Civil on base. Engineer Squadron. Until everything opens, though, Peterson “It’s definitely on schedule,” he said. employees and residents will have to con- “Unless we have really bad weather in tinue to bear with delays at the North and October, there’s no reason we won’t open East gates. on time.” Mr. Williams said CE is working on Construction continues in earnest at the West Gate; the re-opening ceremony is slated for Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Wing Members Return from Deployment Exercise
    Volume 2, No. 4 403rd Wing, Keesler AFB, Miss. March 31, 2017 Photo by Staff Sgt. Shelton Sherrill Tech. Sgt. Jonathan Packer, 815th Airlift Squadron, secures chains on C-130J Super Hercules aircraft during the Green Flag Little Rock 17-05 exercise March 19 in Alexandria, Louisiana. Wing members return GREEN FLAG: from deployment exercise By Staff Sgt. Shelton Sherrill tenance Squadron maintained planes to ensure they were ready for 403rd Wing Public Affairs each mission. “We see this as a dress rehearsal for our deployment coming up in The 403rd Wing successfully completed the Green Flag Little 2018,” said Rubio. “This puts our Airmen, those who are doing the Rock 17-05 exercise held at Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, support functions on the ground and those who are flying the mis- March 10-22. It was the largest Green Flag exercise to date, and the sions, in as close to a combat scenario as we can get so that when first time an Air Force Reserve unit has led such an event. we actually deploy, they will have the feeling they have been there. “The exercise simulated a deployment operated out of Little Rock “It is a time to try out techniques, learn from each other and come AFB, and we flew combat missions to simulated combat areas,” said out much more aware of where we stand and where we need to fo- Lt. Col. Stuart Rubio, 815th Airlift Squadron commander. cus our training leading up to the deployment,” said Rubio. The joint exercise involved active-duty and Air Force Reserve The exercise also prepared members to deal with the stress on components, which provided aerial support to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMER HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA Paie 3 of S
    Homestead AR #4045 Page 2 of 281 BUREAU OF WASTE CLEANUP MAR20 2003 TECHNICAL REVIEW SECTION Former Homestead Air Force Base, Florida ii Prepa red fo- Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence 1' Brooks Air Force Base, Texas FINAL RECORD OF DECISION FOR OPERABLE UNIT 9 AND THE CANAL PORTION OF OPERABLE UNIT 11 (EXCLUDING IRP SITES LF-019 AND WP-023) Contract F4 1624-97-D -8017 January 2003 MONTGOMERY WATSON Dyflr.JILJ 'rucir LLftjNL)r Homestead AR #4045 Pa e 3 of 281 MAR 02003 TECHNICALREVIEW SECTION TABLEOF CONTENTS (Continued) 0 ('7 Section Page 1.0 DECLARATION 1 1.1 SITE NAME AND LOCATION 1 1.2 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE 2 1.3 ASSESSMENT OF SITE 3 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REMEDY 3 1.5 STATUTORY DETERMINATiONS 6 1.6 ROD DATA CERTiFICATION CHECKLIST 7 1.7 AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES 8 2.0 DECISION SUMMARY 2-1 2.1 SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1.1 OU-9 Boundary Canal System 2-2 2.1.1.1 West-South Boundary Canal Segment 2-2 2.1 .1.2 North-East Boundary Canal Segment 2-3 2.1.1.3 Flightline Canal and Other Drainage Canals 2-3 2.1.2 Stormwater Reservoir 2-5' 2.1.3 Military Canal (OU-ll) 2-5 2.2 SITE HISTORY 2-6 2.2.1Regulatory History 2-6 . 2.2.2History of Site Operations 2-7 ,• 2.2.3 Previous OU-9 Investigations 2-9 2.2.4 Previous OU-1 I Investigations 2-9 2.3 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 2-11 2.3.1 Community Participation at 00-9 2-12 2.3.2 Community Participation at OU-11 2-13 2.4 SCOPE AND ROLE OF RESPONSE ACTIONS 2-14 2.4.1 00-9 Boundary Canal 2-14 2.4.2 OU-l 1 Military Canal 2-14 2.5 SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF 00-9 2-16 2.5.1Initial
    [Show full text]